Next Article in Journal
Development of a Mobile Mapping System for Multi-Purpose Applications Composed of a Low-Cost Inertial Measuring Unit, a GNSS-Receiver and a Close-Range LIDAR
Previous Article in Journal
Observing Post-Fire Vegetation Regeneration Dynamics Exploiting High-Resolution Sentinel-2 Data
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Proceedings
Volume 19
Issue 1
10.3390/proceedings2019019008
proceedings-logo
Submit to this Journal
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Assessment of Registration Methods for Cranial 3D Modelling †

by
Inés Barbero-García
* and
José Luis Lerma
Photogrammetry and Laser-Scanner Research Group, Dept. of Cartographic Engineering, Geodesy and Photogrammetry, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022, Valencia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Presented at the II Congress in Geomatics Engineering, Madrid, Spain, 26–27 June 2019.
Proceedings 2019, 19(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019019008
Published: 15 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The II Geomatics Engineering Conference)
Versions Notes

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) models are a useful tool for cranial deformation analysis in infants. The registration of the head 3D models to a known coordinate system is vital for the obtainment of parameters and indexes that quantify deformation. In this study, three registration methodologies have been tested based on the principal component analysis (PCA) without tie points, and PCA measuring manually two and three identified tie points. Results show that the approach using PCA plus three manually identified tie points provides enough accuracy for the given application.
Keywords: cranial deformation; craniosynostosis; photogrammetry; plagiocephaly; principal component analysis (PCA) cranial deformation; craniosynostosis; photogrammetry; plagiocephaly; principal component analysis (PCA)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barbero-García, I.; Lerma, J.L. Assessment of Registration Methods for Cranial 3D Modelling. Proceedings 2019, 19, 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019019008

AMA Style

Barbero-García I, Lerma JL. Assessment of Registration Methods for Cranial 3D Modelling. Proceedings. 2019; 19(1):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019019008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barbero-García, Inés, and José Luis Lerma. 2019. "Assessment of Registration Methods for Cranial 3D Modelling" Proceedings 19, no. 1: 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019019008

APA Style

Barbero-García, I., & Lerma, J. L. (2019). Assessment of Registration Methods for Cranial 3D Modelling. Proceedings, 19(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019019008

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop