Next Article in Journal
Disk-Diffusion of Citrus aurantium dulcis, Rosmarinus officinalis, and Melaleuca alternifolia Essential Oils Against Bacteria and Yeasts
Previous Article in Journal
Biochemical and Hematological Modulation by Smart Biomaterial-Based Therapies in Diabetic Wounds
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Comparative Analysis of Genomic DNA (gDNA) and Complementary DNA (cDNA) for the Identification of GATA1 Variants by Sanger Sequencing †

by
Maria Clara V. Berto
1,2,*,
Isis M. Q. Magalhães
1,
Marina C. Ribeiro
1,
Bruna C. Guido
1,
Agenor C. M. S. Júnior
1,2 and
Ricardo Camargo
1
1
Translational Research Laboratory, Children’s Hospital of Brasília (HCB), Brasília 70910-900, Brazil
2
Postgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília 70910-900, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 6th International Congress on Health Innovation—INOVATEC 2025, Hybrid, 21–23 November 2025.
Proceedings 2026, 137(1), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026137027
Published: 25 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 6th International Congress on Health Innovation—INOVATEC 2025)
Introduction: Variants in GATA1 gene represent an early and critical event in Transient Abnormal Myelopoiesis (TAM) and in the progression to Myeloid Leukemia associated with Down syndrome (ML-DS). Most of these alterations are frameshift or nonsense variants within exon 2, directly affecting translation, altering hematopoietic cell proliferation and differentiation balance. Methodology: An analysis of 21 cases (approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee under protocol No. 7478993) with suspected TAM or ML-DS was based on samples processed at the Children’s Hospital of Brasília. For each case, both genomic DNA (gDNA) and complementary DNA (cDNA) were extracted from the same specimen and sequenced by Sanger methodology. Different primers for amplification of exon 2 of GATA1 in gDNA and cDNA were used. Results: Comparing gDNA and cDNA revealed that cDNA sequencing provided superior sensitivity in samples with <20% blasts (10/21 cases), where in 70% (7/10) of cases, gDNA failed to detect the mutation, which was identified only in cDNA. Among the 21 cDNA samples analyzed, 42.8% exhibited exclusively mutant transcripts, while the remaining demonstrated concomitant expression of wild-type and mutant transcripts. These findings highlight the capacity of cDNA analysis to reveal transcriptional predominance of mutant alleles and to detect variants not captured at the genomic sequencing. Conclusions: Correlating DNA and cDNA by Sanger sequencing proved to be a highly effective strategy for increasing sensitivity and for characterizing the impact of GATA1 variants. However, cDNA may have limitations in detecting variants in splice sites and regulatory regions. Transcript analysis not only improves diagnostic sensibility but also allows the identification of phenotypes with exclusive mutant expression.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.C.V.B. and R.C.; methodology, M.C.V.B. and R.C.; validation, M.C.V.B., R.C. and M.C.R.; formal analysis, M.C.V.B. and R.C.; data curation, M.C.V.B.; writing—original draft preparation, M.C.V.B.; writing—review and editing, M.C.V.B., R.C. and B.C.G.; supervision, R.C. and A.C.M.S.J.; project administration, I.M.Q.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of Hospital da Criança de Brasília José Alencar (protocol 7478993).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Berto, M.C.V.; Magalhães, I.M.Q.; Ribeiro, M.C.; Guido, B.C.; Júnior, A.C.M.S.; Camargo, R. Comparative Analysis of Genomic DNA (gDNA) and Complementary DNA (cDNA) for the Identification of GATA1 Variants by Sanger Sequencing. Proceedings 2026, 137, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026137027

AMA Style

Berto MCV, Magalhães IMQ, Ribeiro MC, Guido BC, Júnior ACMS, Camargo R. Comparative Analysis of Genomic DNA (gDNA) and Complementary DNA (cDNA) for the Identification of GATA1 Variants by Sanger Sequencing. Proceedings. 2026; 137(1):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026137027

Chicago/Turabian Style

Berto, Maria Clara V., Isis M. Q. Magalhães, Marina C. Ribeiro, Bruna C. Guido, Agenor C. M. S. Júnior, and Ricardo Camargo. 2026. "Comparative Analysis of Genomic DNA (gDNA) and Complementary DNA (cDNA) for the Identification of GATA1 Variants by Sanger Sequencing" Proceedings 137, no. 1: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026137027

APA Style

Berto, M. C. V., Magalhães, I. M. Q., Ribeiro, M. C., Guido, B. C., Júnior, A. C. M. S., & Camargo, R. (2026). Comparative Analysis of Genomic DNA (gDNA) and Complementary DNA (cDNA) for the Identification of GATA1 Variants by Sanger Sequencing. Proceedings, 137(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026137027

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop