Next Article in Journal
Opportunities of Coupling Hydrothermal Liquefaction with Wet Oxidation: Significance of Appropriate Thermodynamic Model Selection in Process Modeling
Previous Article in Journal
Overview of the Use of Anaerobic Digestion on Swine Farms and the Potential for Bioenergy Production in Minas Gerais, Brazil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Digital Twins for Circular Economy Optimization: A Framework for Sustainable Engineering Systems †

Noblesoft Solutions, San Antonio, TX 78240, USA
Presented at the 1st SUSTENS Meeting, 4–5 June 2025; Available online: https://www.sustenshub.com/welcome/.
Proceedings 2025, 121(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025121004
Published: 16 July 2025

Abstract

This paper introduces sustainable engineering systems built using digital twin technology and circular economy principles. This research presents a framework for monitoring, modeling, and making decisions in real timusing virtual replicas of physical products, processes, and systems in product lifecycles. A digital twin was used to show that through a digital twin, waste was reduced by 27%, energy consumption was reduced by 32%, and the resource recovery rate increased to 45%. The proposed approach under the framework employs various machine learning algorithms, IoT sensor networks, and advanced data analytics to support closed-loop flows of materials. The results show how digital twins can enhance progress toward the goals the circular economy sets to identify inefficiencies, predict maintenance needs, and optimize the use of resources. This integration is a promising industry approach that will introduce more sustainable operations and maintain economic viability.

1. Introduction

The modern take, make, and dispose economic model has become increasingly unsustainable in a time of finite resources and growing environmental threats [1]. The circular economy is a paradigm based on designing out of waste, keeping it in use, and regenerating natural systems [2]. Nevertheless, resource flows in product lifecycles must be fully visible and controllable to implement circular economy principles successfully.
A promising solution to this challenge is digital twin technology, which consists of replicas of physical products, processes, or systems that can simulate, predict, and optimize performance [3]. Organizations can create digital representations of real-world physical assets and, as in the real world, measure those asset flows and gain unprecedented insights into material and energy flows, allowing us to be perhaps a little bit better at the interventions that help to make the systems more sustainable.
This paper discusses the integration of digital twin technology with the principles of circular economy and how the synergy of the two would enable better sustainable engineering systems. The research addresses the following questions:
  • How do digital twins accurately portray and optimize circular material flows?
  • What technical architecture best supports this integration?
  • How can organizations quantify the benefits derived from their implementation?
  • What barriers must be overcome to achieve widespread adoption?
This paper addresses these questions by providing an approach to organizations that intend to utilize digital twins in their circular economy efforts, thereby making industrial practices more sustainable.

2. Method

2.1. Research Design

This research utilized a mixed-method approach with a literature review, case study analysis, and experimental implementation. The research was conducted in three phases:
Phase 1: An extensive literature review was conducted to identify the current applications of the digital twin in sustainable engineering and circular economy. The review examined applications in the waste and electrical equipment industries, where circular economy principles are increasingly being applied [4]. Following this review, a conceptual framework was designed to integrate the capabilities of the digital twin with those of the circular economy.
Phase 2: The framework was implemented in a medium-sized electronic component manufacturing facility over twelve months. The facility was chosen because it would have a diverse range of input materials, a complex production process, and robust sustainability initiatives.
Phase 3: Key metrics for the digital twin-based circular economy were quantitatively and qualitatively assessed through collected data before, during, and after implementation.

2.2. Digital Twin Architecture

The implemented system was built on the four major layers of the digital twin architecture, following established frameworks for digital twin-driven smart manufacturing [5].
  • The Physical Layer: IoT sensors monitor material flows, energy usage, equipment status, and environmental parameters.
  • Data Layer: Cloud-based processing infrastructure for inputting live sensor data alongside historical records.
  • Analytics Layer: Algorithms that examine patterns, forecast failures, and point out possible optimization approaches.
  • Visualization Layer: Dashboards and reports for decision making.
Figure 1 demonstrates the digital twin architecture for circular economy integration.

2.3. Data Collection and Analysis

Data collection involved
  • Continuous monitoring of material inputs and outputs through IoT sensors;
  • Energy consumption tracking at process and facility levels;
  • Waste stream characterization and quantification;
  • Production quality metrics;
  • Maintenance events and equipment performance indicators.
Data analysis utilized
  • Descriptive statistics to characterize baseline and post-implementation performance;
  • Machine learning algorithms for pattern recognition and predictive modeling;
  • Simulation tools for scenario analysis and optimization;
  • The methods of lifecycle assessment (LCA) for the overall evaluation of environmental impact.
The approach leveraged digital technologies’ emerging role in enabling circular economy transitions through enhanced data visibility and control [6].

3. Results

Implementing the digital twin-enabled circular economy framework greatly improved multiple sustainability dimensions. Table 1 summarizes the basic performance features mentioned above, both before and after implementation.

3.1. Material Flow Optimization

The digital twin model showed several places where material flows should be optimized and where these interventions should be implemented. The implementation followed established cyber-physical production system frameworks [7]. Key findings included the following:
  • Material traceability improved: The traceability of materials was enhanced to 98% within the product lifecycle, which allows for pinpointing loss points and recovery opportunities.
  • Reducing scrap rates: Applying machine learning algorithms to production order parameters allowed them to predict defect probability before it occurred, reducing scrap rates by 57%. This aligns with Industry 4.0 remanufacturing technologies that enable predictive quality control [8].
  • Dynamic material substitution: The digital twin identified viable opportunities to substitute virgin materials with recovered resources based on real-time availability and quality assessments, increasing recycled content by 34%.

3.2. Energy Optimization

Major energy optimization was possible with the digital twin, leveraging large-scale data analytics approaches for circular economy optimization [9].
  • Dynamic process synchronization: The production schedules were designed to minimize energy-intensive startup and shutdown sequences, which resulted in an 18% reduction in total energy consumption.
  • Total energy savings: Energy loss due to suboptimal equipment and process operation was lowered to 14% of total energy savings.
  • Energy-intensive processes: They were scheduled intelligently based on renewable energy availability, allowing us to use 47% more renewable energy.

3.3. Waste Valorization

It was also shown to offer better capabilities for the valorization of waste.
  • Real-time monitoring: Real-time monitoring helped precisely characterize waste streams, which led to more (higher-value) recovery pathways.
  • Identified industrial symbiosis opportunities: Twelve potential industrial symbiosis opportunities stemming from waste streams (either internal or with internal or external partners) were identified.
  • Secondary material quality prediction: Machine learning algorithms were applied to successfully predict the quality parameters of recovered materials, allowing for their further use in production processes.

4. Conclusions

This research illustrates how integrating digital twin technology and circular economy concepts provides a strong means to achieve optimal sustainable engineering systems. In the case study, significant sustainability improvements—including material, energy optimization, and resource recovery—favored the new product design. Visibility into resource flows was possible only through the digital twin, enabling intelligent interventions—closing loops, minimizing waste, and optimizing energy use. Its predictions allowed proactive steps to avoid inefficiencies. Success depends on addressing data integration, skill development, and resource needs. Planning must balance production efficiency, material circularity, and energy use. The findings demonstrate how digital twin technology can support systematic circular economy implementation across various industrial contexts [4], while leveraging smart manufacturing capabilities [5] and cyber-physical production systems [7] to achieve sustainable outcomes. Future research should expand digital twin use in circular economy contexts and explore broader applications in industrial symbiosis networks. This approach promises sustainable engineering systems.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in this study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Towards the Circular Economy Vol. 1: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition; Ellen MacArthur Foundation: Cowes, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. Geissdoerfer, M.; Savaget, P.; Bocken, N.M.P.; Hultink, E.J. The Circular Economy—A new sustainability paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Grieves, M.; Vickers, J. Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems. In Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems; Kahlen, F.J., Flumerfelt, S., Alves, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 85–113. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bressanelli, G.; Saccani, N.; Pigosso, D.C.A.; Perona, M. Circular Economy in the WEEE industry: Systematic literature review and a research agenda. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2020, 23, 174–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lu, Y.; Liu, C.; Wang, K.I.K.; Huang, H.; Xu, X. Digital Twin-driven smart manufacturing: Connotation, reference model, applications and research issues. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2020, 61, 101837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pagoropoulos, A.; Pigosso, D.C.A.; McAloone, T.C. The Emergent Role of Digital Technologies in the Circular Economy: A Review. Procedia CIRP 2017, 64, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Uhlemann, T.H.J.; Lehmann, C.; Steinhilper, R. The Digital Twin: Realizing the Cyber-Physical Production System for Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 2017, 61, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kerin, M.; Pham, D.T. A review of emerging industry 4.0 technologies in remanufacturing. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 237, 117805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jabbour, C.J.C.; Jabbour, A.B.L.D.S.; Sarkis, J.; Filho, M.G. Unlocking the circular economy through new business models based on large-scale data: An integrative framework and research agenda. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2019, 144, 546–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Digital twin architecture for circular economy integration.
Figure 1. Digital twin architecture for circular economy integration.
Proceedings 121 00004 g001
Table 1. Comparison of key performance indicators before and after digital twin implementation.
Table 1. Comparison of key performance indicators before and after digital twin implementation.
Performance IndicatorPre-ImplementationPost-ImplementationImprovement (%)
Material waste (tons/month)17.813.027%
Energy consumption (kWh/unit)12.48.432%
Resource recovery rate (%)4869.645%
Water usage (m3/day)14511223%
Maintenance downtime (hours/month)733158%
Carbon emissions (tCO2e/month)25618627%
Product defect rate (%)4.21.857%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gupta, S. Digital Twins for Circular Economy Optimization: A Framework for Sustainable Engineering Systems. Proceedings 2025, 121, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025121004

AMA Style

Gupta S. Digital Twins for Circular Economy Optimization: A Framework for Sustainable Engineering Systems. Proceedings. 2025; 121(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025121004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gupta, Shubham. 2025. "Digital Twins for Circular Economy Optimization: A Framework for Sustainable Engineering Systems" Proceedings 121, no. 1: 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025121004

APA Style

Gupta, S. (2025). Digital Twins for Circular Economy Optimization: A Framework for Sustainable Engineering Systems. Proceedings, 121(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025121004

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop