Digital Twins for Circular Economy Optimization: A Framework for Sustainable Engineering Systems †
Abstract
1. Introduction
- How do digital twins accurately portray and optimize circular material flows?
- What technical architecture best supports this integration?
- How can organizations quantify the benefits derived from their implementation?
- What barriers must be overcome to achieve widespread adoption?
2. Method
2.1. Research Design
2.2. Digital Twin Architecture
- The Physical Layer: IoT sensors monitor material flows, energy usage, equipment status, and environmental parameters.
- Data Layer: Cloud-based processing infrastructure for inputting live sensor data alongside historical records.
- Analytics Layer: Algorithms that examine patterns, forecast failures, and point out possible optimization approaches.
- Visualization Layer: Dashboards and reports for decision making.
2.3. Data Collection and Analysis
- Continuous monitoring of material inputs and outputs through IoT sensors;
- Energy consumption tracking at process and facility levels;
- Waste stream characterization and quantification;
- Production quality metrics;
- Maintenance events and equipment performance indicators.
- Descriptive statistics to characterize baseline and post-implementation performance;
- Machine learning algorithms for pattern recognition and predictive modeling;
- Simulation tools for scenario analysis and optimization;
- The methods of lifecycle assessment (LCA) for the overall evaluation of environmental impact.
3. Results
3.1. Material Flow Optimization
- Material traceability improved: The traceability of materials was enhanced to 98% within the product lifecycle, which allows for pinpointing loss points and recovery opportunities.
- Reducing scrap rates: Applying machine learning algorithms to production order parameters allowed them to predict defect probability before it occurred, reducing scrap rates by 57%. This aligns with Industry 4.0 remanufacturing technologies that enable predictive quality control [8].
- Dynamic material substitution: The digital twin identified viable opportunities to substitute virgin materials with recovered resources based on real-time availability and quality assessments, increasing recycled content by 34%.
3.2. Energy Optimization
- Dynamic process synchronization: The production schedules were designed to minimize energy-intensive startup and shutdown sequences, which resulted in an 18% reduction in total energy consumption.
- Total energy savings: Energy loss due to suboptimal equipment and process operation was lowered to 14% of total energy savings.
- Energy-intensive processes: They were scheduled intelligently based on renewable energy availability, allowing us to use 47% more renewable energy.
3.3. Waste Valorization
- Real-time monitoring: Real-time monitoring helped precisely characterize waste streams, which led to more (higher-value) recovery pathways.
- Identified industrial symbiosis opportunities: Twelve potential industrial symbiosis opportunities stemming from waste streams (either internal or with internal or external partners) were identified.
- Secondary material quality prediction: Machine learning algorithms were applied to successfully predict the quality parameters of recovered materials, allowing for their further use in production processes.
4. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Towards the Circular Economy Vol. 1: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition; Ellen MacArthur Foundation: Cowes, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Geissdoerfer, M.; Savaget, P.; Bocken, N.M.P.; Hultink, E.J. The Circular Economy—A new sustainability paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grieves, M.; Vickers, J. Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems. In Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems; Kahlen, F.J., Flumerfelt, S., Alves, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 85–113. [Google Scholar]
- Bressanelli, G.; Saccani, N.; Pigosso, D.C.A.; Perona, M. Circular Economy in the WEEE industry: Systematic literature review and a research agenda. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2020, 23, 174–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Liu, C.; Wang, K.I.K.; Huang, H.; Xu, X. Digital Twin-driven smart manufacturing: Connotation, reference model, applications and research issues. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2020, 61, 101837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pagoropoulos, A.; Pigosso, D.C.A.; McAloone, T.C. The Emergent Role of Digital Technologies in the Circular Economy: A Review. Procedia CIRP 2017, 64, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uhlemann, T.H.J.; Lehmann, C.; Steinhilper, R. The Digital Twin: Realizing the Cyber-Physical Production System for Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 2017, 61, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kerin, M.; Pham, D.T. A review of emerging industry 4.0 technologies in remanufacturing. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 237, 117805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jabbour, C.J.C.; Jabbour, A.B.L.D.S.; Sarkis, J.; Filho, M.G. Unlocking the circular economy through new business models based on large-scale data: An integrative framework and research agenda. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2019, 144, 546–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Performance Indicator | Pre-Implementation | Post-Implementation | Improvement (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Material waste (tons/month) | 17.8 | 13.0 | 27% |
Energy consumption (kWh/unit) | 12.4 | 8.4 | 32% |
Resource recovery rate (%) | 48 | 69.6 | 45% |
Water usage (m3/day) | 145 | 112 | 23% |
Maintenance downtime (hours/month) | 73 | 31 | 58% |
Carbon emissions (tCO2e/month) | 256 | 186 | 27% |
Product defect rate (%) | 4.2 | 1.8 | 57% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gupta, S. Digital Twins for Circular Economy Optimization: A Framework for Sustainable Engineering Systems. Proceedings 2025, 121, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025121004
Gupta S. Digital Twins for Circular Economy Optimization: A Framework for Sustainable Engineering Systems. Proceedings. 2025; 121(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025121004
Chicago/Turabian StyleGupta, Shubham. 2025. "Digital Twins for Circular Economy Optimization: A Framework for Sustainable Engineering Systems" Proceedings 121, no. 1: 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025121004
APA StyleGupta, S. (2025). Digital Twins for Circular Economy Optimization: A Framework for Sustainable Engineering Systems. Proceedings, 121(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025121004