Next Article in Journal
Coexistence of Different Scaling Laws for the Entanglement Entropy in a Periodically Driven System
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Ionic Liquids Assisted Synthesis on Morphology and Photocatalytic Properties of Bi4O5Br2
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Preserving Nonclassicality in Noisy Communication Channels †

by
Alessia Allevi
1,*,‡ and
Maria Bondani
2,‡
1
Department of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, Via Valleggio 11, I-22100 Como, Italy
2
Institute for Photonics and Nanotechnologies, CNR, Via Valleggio 11, I-22100 Como, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 11th Italian Quantum Information Science conference (IQIS2018), Catania, Italy, 17–20 September 2018.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Proceedings 2019, 12(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019012003
Published: 25 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of 11th Italian Quantum Information Science conference (IQIS2018))

Abstract

:
Nowadays, the transmission of quantum information, especially for the distribution of cryptographic keys, is required on a global scale. The main obstacle to overcome in free-space communication is the presence of turbulence, which causes both spatial and temporal deformations of the light signals that code information. Here we investigate the extent at which the transmission of mesoscopic twin-beam states through asymmetric noisy channels degrades the nonclassical nature of the photon-number correlations between signal and idler. We consider three nonclassicality criteria, all written in terms of measurable quantities, and demonstrate, both theoretically and experimentally, that the asymmetry introduced by losses affects the three criteria in different ways.

1. Introduction

Quantum states of light represent a useful tool for coding and transmitting information. However, under realistic conditions, such as in free space communication, noise sources can affect the communication channels thus impairing the integrity of the information content [1,2].
In order to address the optimal transmission of quantum states of light, it is thus important to investigate which kinds of states and nonclassical features are more robust against losses and can survive under specific conditions.
Motivated by these requirements, we investigate the survival of nonclassical correlations between the two parties of a mesoscopic twin-beam state in the case in which one of the parties is affected by a varying loss. We consider three different nonclassicality criteria, namely the Schwarz inequality, the noise reduction factor, and a high-order inequality [3,4], and explore which one is the strictest for the observation of nonclassical correlations.
At variance with the standard investigations, which are performed with single-photon detectors, our experimental results were obtained detecting the twin-beam states by means of a pair of hybrid photodetectors endowed with partial photon-number-resolving capability [4].

2. Results

Let’s consider the multi-mode twin-beam state [4]
| ψ μ = n = 0 p n μ | n s | n i ,
where | n = δ ( n h = 1 μ n h ) k = 1 μ | n k represents the n-photon state coming from μ equally- populated modes that impinge on the detector and
p n μ = ( n + μ 1 ) ! n ! ( μ 1 ) ! ( N / μ + 1 ) μ ( μ / N + 1 ) n
is the multimode thermal photon-number probability distribution for N mean-photon number. In order to check the pairwise correlations exhibited by the state in Equation (1), we consider three different nonclassicality criteria, all written in terms of measurable quantities, namely the noise reduction factor (NRF), the Schwarz inequality and a high-order inequality. The NRF for detected photons is defined as
R = σ 2 ( m 1 m 2 ) / m 1 + m 2 ,
where m j is the mean number of photons measured in the j-th arm, whereas σ 2 is the variance. In order to deal with the case of a varying lossy channel [5], we assume that the detection chains have the same efficiency, and that the second channel is affected by an additional amount of loss with respect to the first channel, hereafter indicated as λ = 1 η 2 / η 1 , being η 2 η 1 . By setting m 1 = η 1 n η n = m and m 2 = η 2 n = η ( 1 λ ) n , it is possible to demonstrate [5] that for the state in Equation (1), the NRF reads as:
R = 1 2 η ( 1 λ ) 2 λ + λ 2 ( 2 λ ) m μ .
It is easy to verify that the condition R < 1 , which is sufficient for nonclassicality, is satisfied for 0 < λ < ( 1 + 2 n 1 ) / n , where n = m / ( η μ ) is the mean number of photons per mode. The upper limit approaches unity for n 0 and zero for n : the presence of asymmetric loss is less detrimental for sub-shot-noise correlations in the case of weak and/or multimode twin-beam states.
The second criterion we consider is the Schwarz inequality [6], S > 1 , in which
S = m 1 m 2 m 1 2 m 1 m 2 2 m 2 ,
In the case under examination, i.e., in the presence of the asymmetric loss,
S = 1 + μ μ + 1 η m ,
which always satisfies S > 1 . Nonclassicality can be also investigated by means of high-order correlation functions. Written in terms of detected photons, the generic ( j + k ) th-order correlation function is defined as g j k = m 1 j m 2 k ( m 1 j m 2 k ) 1 . By applying the same assumption on the detection efficiencies used above, the high-order correlation functions up to the fourth order read as follows:
g 11 = G μ 1 + η m , g 21 = G μ 2 + G μ 1 1 + 2 η m + η m 2 , g 12 = G μ 2 + G μ 1 1 + 2 η ( 1 λ ) ( 1 λ ) m + η ( 1 λ ) m 2 , g 22 = G μ 3 + G μ 2 1 + 2 η m + 1 + 2 η ( 1 λ ) ( 1 λ ) m + G μ 1 1 + 2 η 2 ( 1 λ ) + 2 η + 2 η ( 1 λ ) ( 1 λ ) m 2 + η ( 1 λ ) m 3 , g 31 = G μ 3 + 3 G μ 2 1 + η m + G μ 1 1 + 6 η m 2 + η m 3 , g 13 = G μ 3 + 3 G μ 2 1 + η ( 1 λ ) ( 1 λ ) m + G μ 1 1 + 6 η ( 1 λ ) ( 1 λ ) 2 m 2 + η ( 1 λ ) 2 m 3 ,
where m = m 1 m 2 is the average number of detected photons in the absence of loss and G μ k = j = 1 k ( j + μ ) / μ . For λ = 0 , g 12 = g 21 and g 13 = g 31 . Quite recently [3], we have introduced a sufficient nonclassicality criterion, B > 1 , based on correlation functions up to the fourth order. In the case of asymmetric losses, the parameter B reads:
B = m 2 ( 1 λ ) g 22 [ g 13 ] s g 11 + m ( 1 λ ) [ g 12 ] s g 11 ,
where [ g j k ] s = ( g j k + g k j ) / 2 is the symmetrized version of the g j k function. It can be demonstrated that there is a threshold value of λ beyond which the inequality is no more satisfied and that this value increases at increasing the mean number of photons: the behaviour of this criterion is the opposite of the noise reduction factor.
By exploiting the setup shown in the left panel of Figure 1 and described in Section 4, we generated a multi-mode TWB state in the mesoscopic intensity regime and used a pair of photon-number resolving detectors to measure the number of photons contained in every single pulse.
The right panel of Figure 1 displays the three inequalities introduced above as functions of ( 1 λ ) , that is the fraction of photons surviving the asymmetric loss. The experimental data, shown as dots, are plotted together with the corresponding theoretical expectations evaluated in the experimental values of m 1 , m 2 , μ , η and λ . While the Schwarz inequality is always satisfied, thus proving the very quantum nature of TWB, the other two inequalities exhibit a threshold. B > 1 is satisfied only for high values of ( 1 λ ) , that is only for a small amount of loss. On the contrary, the NRF has a threshold for a high amount of loss.

3. Discussion

The three nonclassicality criteria introduced above exhibit different behaviors as a function of an asymmetric loss. In particular, the Schwarz inequality is satisfied for each value of ( 1 λ ) , so that it cannot be used to highlight the presence of a disturbance in the transmission of the light signal. Viceversa, the fulfillment of the other two criteria depends on the value of the loss and there is a threshold value beyond which nonclassicality is not detected anymore. The threshold value behaves differently as a function of the mean number of photons in the twins beam, thus making the two criteria useful in different regimes. The nonclassicality criterion based on NRF is more robust at low intensity and it has been exploited in imaging protocols. In particular, the differential ghost-imaging protocols, both classical [7] and quantum [8], are the most demanding. In fact, for balanced loss, while the condition R < 1 guarantees the quantum protocol a better signal-to-noise ratio, compared to the classical counterpart, R < 0.5 is required to outperform the standard imaging with Poissonian light. The presence of an asymmetric loss tightens the requirements on R, which must be smaller at increasing values of λ . Also high-order correlations can be exploited for imaging [9,10] to achieve better signal-to-noise ratios. Work is in progress to demonstrate that the evaluation of the quantity B can be used to recover ghost images, with B > 1 qualifying the quantumness of the employed resources. Finally, as a further step in the field of Quantum Communication, the data corresponding to different loss values can be suitably combined to simulate noisy channels characterized by specific statistical features [11].

4. Materials and Methods

According to the setup shown in the left panel of Figure 1, the fundamental and the third harmonic fields of a mode-locked Nd:YLF laser regeneratively amplified at 500 Hz produced the fourth harmonic (FH) at 262 nm in a type I β -Barium borate crystal (BBO 1 , cut angle = 37 deg, 8-mm long). The FH beam was used as pump field to generate a multi-mode TWB state by spontaneous parametric downconversion in a second type-I BBO crystal (BBO 2 , cut angle = 46.7 deg, 6-mm long). Two twin portions at frequency degeneracy, i.e., at 523 nm, were then spectrally and spatially filtered. We simulated the asymmetric lossy channel by inserting in one of the twin arms a half-wave plate (HWP) followed by a polarizing cube beam splitter (PBS). We changed the amount of loss by rotating the HWP by 50 deg in steps of 2 deg. For each angle, 100,000 acquisitions were performed. As the detectors we used two hybrid photodetectors (HPDs, mod. R10467U-40, Hamamatsu Photonics), whose outputs were amplified, synchronously integrated and digitized (ADC + PC). As already explained elsewhere [4], the detection apparatus can be calibrated in a self-consistent way by using the data corresponding to the same light under examination. In such a way, we have axcess to the shot-by-shot numbers of detected photons and we can thus investigate the statistical properties of light.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Capraro, I.; Tomaello, A.; Dall’Arche, A.; Gerlin, F.; Ursin, R.; Vallone, G.; Villoresi, P. Impact of turbulence in long range quantum and classical communications. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 200502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Vasylyev, D.; Semenov, A.A.; Vogel, W. Atmospheric quantum channels with weak and strong turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 117, 090501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Allevi, A.; Olivares, S.; Bondani, M. Measuring high-order photon-number correlations in experiments with multimode pulsed quantum states. Phys. Rev. A 2012, 85, 063835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Allevi, A.; Bondani, M. Nonlinear and quantum optical properties and applications of intense twin-beams. Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 2017, 66, 49–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Allevi, A.; Bondani, M. Can nonclassical correlations survive in the presence of asymmetric lossy channels? Eur. Phys. J. D 2018, 72, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vogel, W.; Welsch, D.G. Quantum Optics; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA; Publishing House: New York, NY, USA, 2006; ISBN 978-3-527-40507-7. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ferri, F.; Magatti, D.; Lugiato, L.A.; Gatti, A. Differential Ghost Imaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 104, 253603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brida, G.; Genovese, M.; Berchera, I.R. Experimental realization of sub-shot-noise quantum imaging. Nat. Photonics 2010, 4, 227–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bondani, M.; Allevi, A.; Andreoni, A. Ghost imaging by intense multimode twin beam. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2012, 203, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chan, K.W.; O’Sullivan, M.N.; Boyd, R.W. High-order thermal ghost imaging. Opt. Lett. 2009, 34, 3343–3345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Bohmann, M.; Kruse, R.; Sperling, J.; Silberhorn, C.; Vogel, W. Probing free-space quantum channels with laboratory-based experiments. Phys. Rev. A 2017, 95, 063801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a): Sketch of the experimental setup. See Section 4 for details. (b): Noise reduction factor (blue dots), S parameter (green dots) and B parameter (black dots) as functions of 1 λ . The theoretical expectations are shown as lines with the same color choice. The red line at R = 1 represents the boundary condition, with m = 2.1 , μ = 100 and η = 0.14 .
Figure 1. (a): Sketch of the experimental setup. See Section 4 for details. (b): Noise reduction factor (blue dots), S parameter (green dots) and B parameter (black dots) as functions of 1 λ . The theoretical expectations are shown as lines with the same color choice. The red line at R = 1 represents the boundary condition, with m = 2.1 , μ = 100 and η = 0.14 .
Proceedings 12 00003 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Allevi, A.; Bondani, M. Preserving Nonclassicality in Noisy Communication Channels. Proceedings 2019, 12, 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019012003

AMA Style

Allevi A, Bondani M. Preserving Nonclassicality in Noisy Communication Channels. Proceedings. 2019; 12(1):3. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019012003

Chicago/Turabian Style

Allevi, Alessia, and Maria Bondani. 2019. "Preserving Nonclassicality in Noisy Communication Channels" Proceedings 12, no. 1: 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019012003

APA Style

Allevi, A., & Bondani, M. (2019). Preserving Nonclassicality in Noisy Communication Channels. Proceedings, 12(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019012003

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop