In submitting conference proceedings to Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of the Proceedings journal.
- Type of peer review: double-blind. The conference papers were sent anonymously to two reviewers, who in turn conducted reviews though a template review form that was sent to them beforehand.
- Conference submission management system: email.
- Number of submissions sent for review: 43.
- Number of submissions accepted: 30.
- Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 69.8%.
- Average number of reviews per paper: two.
- Total number of reviewers involved: three.
- Any additional information on the review process: NA.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).