You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Proceedings
  • Abstract
  • Open Access

15 July 2024

Democratizing Coffee Genetics: Outcomes of the “Coffee Genetic Discovery” Project †

and
1
RD2 Vision, 60 Rue du Carignan, 34270 Valflaunes, France
2
Luigi Lavazza S.p.A., R&D, Strada di Settimo 411, 10156 Torino, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the International Coffee Convention 2024, Mannheim, Germany, 17–18 October 2024.
This article belongs to the Proceedings ICC 2024

Abstract

The genetic conformity of the cultivated varieties of coffee is key for the sustainability of coffee growing. In the past years, various studies have shown that genetic conformity was overall low. This situation is mainly due to a lack of professionalization in the coffee seed sector. However, this can impact the economic performance of growers who expect yield, disease resistance, and/or cup quality from their coffee plants. With the sponsorship of Lavazza, RD2 Vision has launched the “Coffee Genetic Discovery”. The aim of “Coffee Genetic Discovery” is twofold: to democratize the genetic analysis of cultivated coffee varieties and provide guidelines for improving the professionalization of the coffee seed sector. Coffee growers (Coffea arabica for this first edition) from 24 countries took part in a draw. One hundred winners benefited from a free genetic analysis of their favorite coffee plants. Each grower received the results individually. Most participants were from Central America and Mexico (50%), followed by Asia (23%) and then Africa (14%) and South America (13%). A total of 73% of the participants had an idea of what their cultivar was, while 27% had no idea. Most submitted samples were from the Core Ethiopian genetic group, which includes Geisha, Chiroso, and Sidra, showing the interest of farmers for cultivars with a high cup quality. Two thirds of the supposed cultivars were genetically conformed, while one third was not. This confirms the need for a more professional seed sector.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M.; writing—original draft preparation, C.M.; and writing—review and editing, B.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by Luigi Lavazza S.p.A.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

C.M. is currently employed by RD2 Vision. B.S. is an employee of Luigi Lavazza S.p.A. The authors declare that this study received funding from Luigi Lavazza S.p.A. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.