In submitting conference proceedings to Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
- Type of peer review: single-blind
- Conference submission management system: Sciforum
- Number of submissions sent for review: 229
- Number of submissions accepted: 172
- Number of submissions published: 90
- Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 0.75
- Average number of reviews per paper: 1
- Total number of reviewers involved: 83
- peer-review process and regulations: The review process was conducted in a single-blind manner, with the entire procedure administered through the MDPI Conference platform, Sciforum. Evaluations were performed by experts in the field. Based on their feedback, revisions were made to each abstract, encompassing thorough examinations of the structure, content and writing. The final decision was made by the chairs of the conference.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).