Next Article in Journal
New Exact Solutions of Some Important Nonlinear Fractional Partial Differential Equations with Beta Derivative
Next Article in Special Issue
Second Hankel Determinant for the Subclass of Bi-Univalent Functions Using q-Chebyshev Polynomial and Hohlov Operator
Previous Article in Journal
New Fractional Integral Inequalities for Convex Functions Pertaining to Caputo–Fabrizio Operator
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inclusion Relations for Dini Functions Involving Certain Conic Domains
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

On Geometric Properties of a Certain Analytic Function with Negative Coefficients

by
Matthew Olanrewaju Oluwayemi
1,2,3,
Esther O. Davids
1,3 and
Adriana Cătaş
4,*
1
Health and Well Being Research Group, Landmark University, SDG 3, Omu-Aran 251103, Nigeria
2
Quality Education Research Group, Landmark University, SDG 4, Omu-Aran 251103, Nigeria
3
Department of Physical Sciences, Landmark University, Omu-Aran 251103, Nigeria
4
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Oradea, 1 University Street, 410087 Oradea, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fractal Fract. 2022, 6(3), 172; https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6030172
Submission received: 7 February 2022 / Revised: 5 March 2022 / Accepted: 14 March 2022 / Published: 21 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Geometric Function Theory)

Abstract

:
Various function theorists have successfully defined and investigated different kinds of analytic functions. The applications of such functions have played significant roles in geometry function theory as a field of complex analysis. In this work, therefore, a certain subclass of univalent analytic functions of the form f ( z ) = z m = 2 t [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] C m [ m σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n z m k = t + 1 a k z k is defined using a generalized differential operator. Furthermore, some geometric properties for the class were established.

1. Introduction and Preliminaries

Let U be the unit disk, that is, U = { z C : | z | < 1 } , A be the class of functions analytic in U satisfying the conditions f ( 0 ) = 0 and f ( 0 ) = 1 and of the form
f ( z ) = z + k = 2 a k z k
We denote T the subclass of A analytic in U of the form
f ( z ) = z k = 2 a k z k , a k 0 .
Differential operator is one of the tools used in geometric functions theory. Various authors have used different operators in literature. See [1,2,3,4,5,6,7] for instance. Differential operator D α , β , μ 1 , μ 2 n , λ defined as
D α , β , μ 1 , μ 2 n , λ f ( z ) = z + k = 2 a + ( α β ) ( λ + μ 2 μ 1 ) ( k 1 ) + b a + b n a k z k ,
where a , b 0 , a + b 0 , α > β 0 , λ > μ 2 μ 1 and n N 0 was used to define a certain class of univalent functions. See [2,6].
In this work, we set
K = a + ( α β ) ( λ + μ 2 μ 1 ) ( k 1 ) + b a + b
in (3) above.
Lemma 1
([6]). Let the function f A . Then Q α , β , μ , σ n , λ , ω ( γ , c ) if and only if
k = 2 [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] a + ( α β ) ( λ + μ 2 μ 1 ) ( k 1 ) + b a + b n a k ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ .
See [6] for the proof.
Silverman in [8] was the first to pave way for the study of functions with negative coefficients of the form (2), after which various forms of such functions have been opened up by many researchers in the field of geometric functions theory. Rather than fixing the negative coefficients from the second coefficients in (2), Owa in [9] considered fixing more coefficients, which motivated the work of Aouf and Darwish in [10] and gave birth to the investigation of univalent functions f ( z ) with fixed finitely many negative coefficients and the behaviors of such kinds of functions. In [4,5,6,7,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18], for instance, various classes of univalent functions with finitely many fixed coefficients were investigated.
Motivated by the work of Oluwayemi and Faisal in [6], the following class of functions Q α , β , μ , σ n , λ , ω ( γ , c , C m ) Q α , β , μ , σ n , λ , ω ( γ , c ) is introduced.
Definition 1.
Let f T be defined by (2). Then, f ( z ) is in the class Q α , β , μ , σ n , λ , ω ( γ , c , C m ) if it is of the form
f ( z ) = z m = 2 t [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] C m [ m σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n z m k = t + 1 a k z k
where
C m = [ m σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] a m , a n d a k = [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] ( 1 m = 2 t C m ) [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n .
Note that: σ 1 , 0 < γ 1 , 1 < ω 1 2 , a n d c γ σ 0 .

2. Main Results

Theorem 1.
Let the function f T . Then Q α , β , μ , σ n , λ , ω ( γ , c , C m ) if
k = 2 [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] a k 1 m = 2 t C m
Proof. 
Let f Q α , β , μ , σ n , λ , ω ( γ , c , C m ) . From (7),
a m = [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] C m [ m σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n .
Then, f Q α , β , μ , σ n , λ , ω ( γ , c , C m ) Q α , β , μ , σ n , λ , ω ( γ , c ) if and only if
m = 2 t [ m σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] a m + k = t + 1 [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] a k 1
which also implies from (7) that,
k = t + 1 [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] a k 1 m = 2 t C m
which completes the proof. □
Corollary 1.
Let f Q α , β , μ , σ n , λ , ω ( γ , c , C m ) for k t + 1 . Then, we have that
a k [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] ( 1 m = 2 t C m ) [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n .
The best possible result is of the function
f ( z ) = z m = 2 t [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] [ m σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n z m k = t + 1 [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] 1 m = 2 t C m [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n z k .
Corollary 2.
Let f ( z ) be defined by (6). Then f Q α , β , μ , σ n , λ , 1 2 ( γ , c , C m ) for and k t + 1 , we have that
a k [ ( 1 + β 2 ) + c γ σ ] ( 1 m = 2 t C m ) [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n
with equality only for the functions f ( z ) of the form
f ( z ) = z m = 2 t [ ( 1 + β 2 ) + c γ σ ] [ m σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n z m k = t + 1 [ ( 1 + β 2 ) + c γ σ ] ( 1 m = 2 t C m ) [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n z k .
Corollary 3.
Let f ( z ) be defined by (6). Then f Q α , 0 , μ , σ n , λ , ω ( γ , c , C m ) for and k t + 1 , we have that
a k ( 2 ω + c γ σ ) ( 1 m = 2 t C m ) [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n
with equality only for the functions f ( z ) of the form
f ( z ) = z m = 2 t ( 2 ω + c γ σ ) [ m σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n z m k = t + 1 ( 2 ω + c γ σ ) ( 1 m = 2 t C m ) [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n z k .
Corollary 4.
Let f ( z ) be defined by (6). Then f Q α , 0 , μ , 1 n , λ , ω ( 1 , 1 , C m ) for and k t + 1 , we have that
a k 2 ω ( 1 m = 2 t C m ) [ k 2 ω + 1 ] K n
with equality only for the functions f ( z ) of the form
f ( z ) = z m = 2 t 2 ω [ m 2 ω + 1 ] K n z m k = t + 1 2 ω ( 1 m = 2 t C m ) [ k 2 ω + 1 ] K n z k .
Corollary 5.
Let f ( z ) be defined by (6). Then f Q α , 0 , μ , 1 n , λ , 1 2 ( 1 , 1 , C m ) for and k t + 1 , we have that
a k 1 m = 2 t C m ( k 1 ) K n
with equality only for the functions f ( z ) of the form
f ( z ) = z m = 2 t 1 m = 2 t ( m 1 ) K n z m k = t + 1 1 m = 2 t C m ( k 1 ) K n z k .
Theorem 2.
Let j N and f 1 ( z ) , f j ( z ) be defined by
f j ( z ) = z m = 2 t [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] C m [ m σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n z m k = t + 1 a k , j z k
belong to the class Q α , β , μ , σ n , λ , ω ( γ , c , C m ) . Then,
G ( z ) = i = 2 j ς i f i a n d i = 2 j ς i = 1 , 0 m = 2 t C m 1 , 0 C m 1
also belongs to the class Q α , β , μ , σ n , λ , ω ( γ , c , C m ) .
Proof. 
Let f j Q α , β , μ , σ n , λ , ω ( γ , c , C m ) . It follows from Theorem 1 that
k = 2 [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] a k , j 1 m = 2 t C m
for every i = 1 , j . So that
G ( z ) = i = 2 j ς i f i = z m = 2 t [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] C m [ m σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n z m k = t + 1 i = 2 j ς i a k , j z k .
Thus,
k = t + 1 [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ i = 2 j ς i a k , j
i = 2 j k = t + 1 [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ς i
< i = 2 j 1 m = 2 t C m ς i = 1 m = 2 t C m .
Theorem 3.
Let
f t ( z ) = z m = 2 t [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] C m [ m σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n z m
and for k t + 1
f k ( z ) = z m = 2 t [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] C m [ m σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n z m k = t + 1 [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] ( 1 m = 2 t C m ) [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n z k .
Then the function f ( z ) Q α , β , μ , σ n , λ , ω ( γ , c , C m ) if and only if it can be expressed in the form f ( z ) = k = t λ k f k ( z ) , w h e r e λ k 0 , ( k t ) a n d k = t λ k = 1 .
Proof. 
Let
f ( z ) = k = t + 1 λ k f k ( z ) + λ t f t ( z )
= λ t z λ t m = 2 t [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] C m [ m σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n z m + k = t + 1 λ k z
k = t + 1 λ k m = 2 t [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] C m [ m σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n z m
k = t + 1 λ k [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] ( 1 m = 2 t C m ) [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n z k
= λ t + k = t + 1 λ k z λ t + k = t + 1 λ k m = 2 t [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] C m [ m σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n z m
k = t + 1 [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] ( 1 m = 2 t C m ) [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n λ k z k
= z m = 2 t [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] C m [ m σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n z m k = t + 1 [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] ( 1 m = 2 t C m ) [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n λ k z k .
We can further write that
k = t + 1 [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] ( 1 m = 2 t C m ) [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n K n λ k
= ( 1 m = 2 t C m ) k = t + 1 λ k = ( 1 m = 2 t C m ) ( 1 λ k ) < 1 m = 2 t C m .
Therefore f ( z ) Q α , β , μ , σ n , λ , ω ( γ , c , C m ) .
Conversely, suppose f ( z ) Q α , β , μ , σ n , λ , ω ( γ , c , C m ) . From Definition 1 and (6),
f ( z ) = z m = 2 t [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] C m [ m σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n z m k = t + 1 a k z k .
Set
λ k = [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] ( 1 m = 2 t C m ) a k
then λ k 0 and for λ t = 1 k = t + 1 λ k ; we have that
f ( z ) = z m = 2 t [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] C m [ m σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n z m k = t + 1 [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] ( 1 m = 2 t C m ) [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n λ k z k
= f t ( z ) k = t + 1 z m = 2 t [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] C m [ m σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n z m f k ( z ) λ k
= f t ( z ) k = t + 1 f t ( z ) f k ( z ) λ k
= 1 k = t + 1 λ k f t ( z ) + k = t + 1 λ k f k ( z ) = k = t + 1 λ k λ k f k ( z )

Integral Operator

We now consider the effect of the Alexander operator, defined as
I ( f ) = 0 z f ( t ) t d t
for the functions in the class S on the class Q α , β , μ , σ n , λ , ω ( γ , c , C m ) through the following theorem.
Theorem 4.
Let f ( z ) , defined by (6), belong to the class Q α , β , μ , σ n , λ , ω ( γ , c , C m ) . Then, I ( f ) is also in the class Q α , β , μ , σ n , λ , ω ( γ , c , C m ) .
Proof. 
Assume f ( z ) Q α , β , μ , σ n , λ , ω ( γ , c , C m )
I ( f ) = z m = 2 t [ ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ σ ] C m [ m σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n z m k = t + 1 a k k z k .
Now
k = t + 1 [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n a k k 1 k + 1 [ k σ c ω ( 2 + β ) + c γ ] K n a k
1 k + 1 1 m = 2 t C m = 1 k + 1 m = 2 t C m k + 1 < 1 m = 2 t C m m
which implies that I ( f ) Q α , β , μ , σ n , λ , ω ( γ , c , C m ) .   □
Remark 1
([18]). The operator maps the class of starlike functions onto the class of convex functions.
The class of functions studied in [19] consists of the convex function with α = 1 .

3. Conclusions

The class of functions considered in the work add to the existing knowledge in the investigation of properties of univalent functions with negative coefficients. Furthermore, the class of functions (6) reduces to (2) with ω = 0 and c γ = σ .

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.O.O.; Investigation, M.O.O., E.O.D. and A.C.; Methodology, M.O.O., E.O.D. and A.C.; Validation, M.O.O. and A.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.O.O.; writing—review and editing, A.C. and M.O.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lupaş, A.A. On a certain subclass of analytic functions involving Sǎlǎgean operator and Ruscheweyh derivative. J. Comput. Anal. Appl. 2015, 19, 278–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alamoush, A.G.; Darus, M. On certain subclasses of analytic functions defined by generalized differential operators. Romai J. 2015, 11, 17–31. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cǎtas, A. On certain class of p-valent functions defined by new multiplier transformations. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Geometric Function Theory and Applications, Istanbul, Turkey, 20–24 August 2007; TC Istanbul Kultur University: Bakırköy, Turkey, 2007; pp. 241–250. [Google Scholar]
  4. Juma, A.R.S.; Kulkarni, S.R. Applications of Generalised Ruscheweyh derivatives to univalent functions with finitely many coefficients. Surv. Math. Appl. 2009, 4, 77–88. [Google Scholar]
  5. Najafzadeh, S. Application of Salagean and Ruscheweyh operators on univalent functions with finitely many coefficients. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2010, 13, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  6. Oluwayemi, J.O.; Faisal, I. A new family of analytic functions associated with multiplier transformation. Sci. Afr. 2021, 12, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Oluwayemi, M.O.; Fadipe-Joseph, O.A. A new class of functions with finitely many fixed points. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2022, 2022, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Silverman, H. Univalent functions with negative coefficients. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1975, 51, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Owa, S. On new classes of univalent functions with negative coefficients. Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 1985, 22, 43–52. [Google Scholar]
  10. Aouf, M.K.; Darwish, H.E. Fixed coefficients for new classes of univalent functions with negative coefficients. Demonstr. Math. 1997, 30, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Acu, M.; Najafzadeh, S. Univalent holomorphic functions with finitely many fixed coefficients involving Sǎlǎgean operator. Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl. (IJNAA) 2010, 1, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ezhilarasi, R.; Sudharsan, T.V.; Sivasubramanian, S. On certain subclass of univalent functions with finitely many fixed coefficients defined by Bessel function. Malaya J. Mat. 2020, 8, 1085–1091. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ezhilarasi, R.; Sudharsan, T.V.; Mohd, M.H.; Subramanian, K.G. Connections between Certain Subclasses of Analytic Univalent Functions Based on Operators. J. Complex Anal. 2017, 2017, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Marimuthu, K.; Mayilvaganan, S.; Uma, J. Certain subclass of multivalent functions with finitely many fixed coefficients by using salagean differential operator. Adv. Math. Sci. J. 2021, 10, 911–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Oluwayemi, M.O.; Okoro, J.O. Certain results on a class of functions with negative coefficients. Int. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 2021, 16, 1295–1302. [Google Scholar]
  16. Shanthi, M.; Selvaraj, C. A subclass of multivalent functions with finitely many fixed coefficients. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2018, 118, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vidyasagar, K.V. Geometric properties of some class of univalent functions by fixing finitely many coefficients. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2019, 7, 49–56. [Google Scholar]
  18. Varma, S.S.; Rosy, T. Certain properties of a subclass of univalent functions with finitely many fixed coefficients. Khayyam J. Math. 2017, 1, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fadipe-Joseph, O.A.; Oluwayemi, M.O. Sufficient conditions for class Cα. Int. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 2021, 16, 154–159. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oluwayemi, M.O.; Davids, E.O.; Cătaş, A. On Geometric Properties of a Certain Analytic Function with Negative Coefficients. Fractal Fract. 2022, 6, 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6030172

AMA Style

Oluwayemi MO, Davids EO, Cătaş A. On Geometric Properties of a Certain Analytic Function with Negative Coefficients. Fractal and Fractional. 2022; 6(3):172. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6030172

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oluwayemi, Matthew Olanrewaju, Esther O. Davids, and Adriana Cătaş. 2022. "On Geometric Properties of a Certain Analytic Function with Negative Coefficients" Fractal and Fractional 6, no. 3: 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6030172

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop