Abstract
In this paper, we study nonlinear fractional -difference equations equipped with separated nonlocal boundary conditions. The existence of solutions for the given problem is proven by applying Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem and the Leray–Schauder alternative. In contrast, the uniqueness of the solutions is established by employing Banach’s contraction mapping principle. Examples illustrating the main results are also presented.
Keywords:
Caputo fractional (p,q)-difference equations; nonlocal boundary conditions; existence and uniquness; Leray–Schauder alternative; fixed-point theory MSC:
05A30; 26A51; 26D10; 26D15
1. Introduction
In recent years, fractional differential equations have been considered a popular field of research and have attracted many researchers’ attention. This is mainly because fractional differential equations are found to be effective and more practical than classical differential equations, particularly in the mathematical modeling of dynamical systems, such as fractals and chaos. In the last two decades, the fractional differential equations have developed from theoretical aspects of the existence and uniqueness of solutions to analytic and numerical methods for finding solutions, which can be found in [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Moreover, in modern mathematical analysis, fractional differential equations have a range of applications, such as engineering and clinical disciplines, including biology, physics, chemistry, economics, signal and image processing, and control theory; see [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17] for more details.
In 1910, F. H. Jackson initiated a study of the q-difference calculus or quantum calculus (briefly called q-calculus) in a symmetrical manner and introduced the q-derivative and q-integral, which can be found in [18,19]. With these results, q-calculus has arisen in a range of applications, such as combinatorics, orthogonal polynomials, basic hypergeometric functions, number theory, quantum theory, mechanics, and theory of relativity; see [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40] and the references cited therein. The book by V. Kac and P. Cheung [41] covers the basic theoretical concepts of q-calculus.
Because the exploration has been continued by generalizing the existing results through creative discussions and novel techniques of fractional calculus, fractional q-difference calculus has been introduced by W.A. Al-Salam [42] and R.P. Agarwal [43]. Furthermore, fractional q-difference equations have attracted the attention of researchers; for instance, B. Ahmad et al. [44] investigated the existence results of nonlocal boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional q-difference equations:
where and are constants with and are the fractional q-derivative of the Caputo type and the first-order q-difference operator, respectively. For more early and recent works on the existence theory of fractional q-difference equations, we refer to [45,46,47,48].
Later on, the subject of -calculus was generalized and developed from the q-calculus theory into the two-parameter -integer, which is used effectively in many fields, and some results on the study of -calculus can be found in [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74].
Inspired and motivated by some of the above applications, in 2018, N. Kamsrisuk et al. [75] considered the existence and uniqueness of solutions for the first-order quantum -difference equation subject to a nonlocal condition:
where are quantum numbers, is the -difference operator, and are constants.
Furthermore, C. Promsakon et al. [76] introduced the second-order -difference equations with separated boundary conditions:
where and are constants. and are the second and first order of the -difference operator, respectively.
However, the study of nonlocal boundary value problems of fractional -difference equations is at its infancy, and much of the work on the topic is yet to be done.
In this paper, we study the existence and uniqueness of solutions of the nonlocal boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional -difference equations given by
where and are constants; and are the fractional -derivative of the Caputo type and the first-order -difference operator, respectively.
2. Preliminaries
In this section, we give some definitions and fundamental results of the q-calculus and -calculus along with the fractional -calculus, which can be found in [27,28,56,58]. We also give a lemma that will be used in obtaining the main results of the paper.
Throughout this paper, let be an interval with , and be constants,
The q-analogue of the power function with is given by
The -analogue of the power function with is given by
For , the -gamma function is defined by
and an equivalent definition of (7) is given in [59] as
where
Obviously, .
For , the definition of the -beta function is
and (9) can also be written as
see [77,78] for more details.
Definition 1.
([56]). If is a continuous function, then the -derivative of f is defined by
and . Observe that the function is defined on provided that exists for all
Definition 2.
([56]). If is a continuous function, then the -integral of f is defined as
provided that the right-hand side converges. Note that the function is defined on , which is extended from of a function
Theorem 1.
([56]). Let , for all , be -differentiable on and λ be a constant. Then,
- (i)
- ;
- (ii)
- ;
- (iii)
- ;
- (iv)
- .
Theorem 2.
([79]). Let be a continuous function. The following formulas hold for
- (i)
- ;
- (ii)
- ;
- (iii)
- , for .
Definition 3.
([77]). Let be a continuous function and . The fractional -integral of fractional Riemann–Liouville type is given by and
where .
Definition 4.
([77]). The fractional -derivative of Riemann-Liouville type of order of a continuous function f is defined by and
where is the smallest integer greater than or equal to α.
Definition 5.
([77]). The fractional -derivative of Caputo type of order of a continuous function f is defined by and
where is the smallest integer greater than or equal to α.
Lemma 1.
([77]). Let f be a continuous function and . Then, the following formulas hold:
- (i)
- ,
- (ii)
Lemma 2.
([77]). Let f be a continuous function, , and . Then, the following equality holds:
Lemma 3.
([77]). Let f be a continuous function and . Then, the following equality holds:
In order to define the solution of the boundary value problem (4), we need the following lemma.
Lemma 4.
Let be constants and and be the fractional -derivative of the Caputo type and the first-order -difference operator, respectively. For a given , a unique solution of the boundary value problem
is given by
where
3. Main Results
In view of Lemma 4, we define an operator as
where
Let denote the Banach space of all continuous functions from to endowed with norm defined by .
Observe that the boundary value problem (4) has a unique solution if the operator equation has a fixed point, where is given in (20). For convenience, we let
where
and
Theorem 3.
Let be a continuous function and note that there exists a -integrable function such that
- , for each and
Proof.
Let us fix and choose
where
We define and we shall show that where is defined (20). For any , observe that
and
which, in view of (21) and (23), implies that
This implies that .
In case , where is a constant, the condition (22) becomes and Theorem 3 takes the form of the following results.
Remark 1.
If is a contraction function and there exists a constant with
for each and , then the boundary value problem (4) has a unique solution, provided that .
Our next existence results are based on Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem.
Lemma 5.
([80]). (Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem) Let M be a closed, bounded, convex, and non-empty subset of a Banach space X. Let be two operators such that:
- (i)
- whenever ;
- (ii)
- A is compact and continuous;
- (iii)
- B is a contraction mapping.
Then, there exists such that
Theorem 4.
Let be a continuous function satisfying In addition, we assume that
- there exists a function and a non-decreasing function , withwhere
Proof.
Let where
where and define the operators and on as
and
where
For we have
Thus, From and (26), it follows that is a contraction mapping. By continuity of h, we obtain that the operator is continuous. It is not difficult to verify that
Therefore, the set is uniformly bounded. Next, we shall prove the compactness of the operator Now, for any with Then, we obtain
which is independent of x and tends to zero as Thus, the set is equicontinuous. By the Arzelá–Ascoli theorem, is compact on Therefore, the boundary value problem (4) has at least one solution on This completes the proof. □
Remark 2.
The next existence results are based on the Leray–Schauder nonlinear alternative.
Lemma 6.
([81]). (Nonlinear alternative for single value maps) Let E be a Banach space, a closed, convex subset of E, and an open subset of with Suppose that is a continuous, compact function; that is, is a relatively compact subset of map. Then, either
- (i)
- Ψ has a fixed point in or
- (ii)
- there is a (the boundary of in ) and with
Theorem 5.
Let be a continuous function. Assume that:
- there exist functions and a non-decreasing function such that
- there exists a number such thatwhere
Then, the boundary value problem (4) has at least one solution on
Proof.
Consider the operator defined by (20). We first show that is continuous. Let be a sequence of function such that on Given that h is a continuous function on we have
Therefore, we obtain
which implies that
Thus, the operator is continuous.
Next, we show that maps a bounded set into a bounded set in For a positive number let Then, for any we have
We have
Therefore, the set is uniformly bounded.
Now, we show that maps bounded sets into equicontinuous sets of Let with be two points and be a bounded ball in Then, for any , we obtain
Obviously, the right-hand side of the above inequality tends to zero independently of as Thus, it follows by the Arzelá–Ascoli theorem that is completely continuous.
Now, the operator satisfies all the conditions of Lemma 6 and, therefore, by its conclusion, either condition or condition holds.
Now, we show that the conclusion is not possible. Let
with Then, it can be shown that
Suppose there exists and such that Then, for such choices of x and , we have
This leads to a contradiction. Accordingly, by Lemma 6, we have that has a fixed point which is a solution of the boundary value problem (4). Therefore, the proof is completed. □
Remark 3.
If in are continuous, then where A is defined by (23).
4. Examples
In this section, we give some examples to illustrate the investigated results.
Example 1.
Consider the following fractional -difference equation with the boundary value problem
By applying Theorem 3 with , and λ is a constant to be fixed later on. By simple calculation, we have and . Let
It is not difficult to show that
for each , and
Then, all the assumptions of Theorem 3 are satisfied. Accordingly, by Theorem 3, the boundary value problem (28) has a unique solution.
Example 2.
Consider the following fractional -difference equation with the boundary value problem
By applying Theorem 5 with . By simple calculation, we have and .
On the other hand, we have
5. Conclusions
In this paper, we study nonlocal fractional -difference equations with separated nonlocal boundary conditions. The existence of solutions for the problem is given by applying some well-known tools in fixed-point theory, such as Banach’s contraction mapping principle, Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem, and the Leray–Schauder nonlinear alternative. Some illustrating examples are also presented. We hope that the paper will inspire interested readers working in this field to draw upon these ideas and techniques.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, P.N., K.N., J.T., S.K.N. and B.A.; investigation, P.N., K.N., J.T., S.K.N. and B.A.; methodology, P.N., K.N., J.T., S.K.N. and B.A.; validation, P.N., K.N., J.T., S.K.N. and B.A.; visualization, P.N., K.N., J.T., S.K.N. and B.A.; writing—original draft, P.N. and K.N.; writing—review and editing, P.N. and K.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
This research has received funding support from the National Science, Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF), Thailand.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Agarwal, R.P.; Belmekki, M.; Benchohra, M. A survey on semilinear differential equations and inclusions involving Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2009, 2009, 981728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gafiychuk, V.; Datsko, B.; Meleshko, V. Mathematical modeling of different types of instabilities in time fractional reaction-diffusion system. Comput. Math. Appl. 2010, 59, 101–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, B.; Agarwal, R.P. On nonlocal fractional boundary value problems. Dyn. Contin. Discrete Impuls. Syst. 2011, 18, 535–544. [Google Scholar]
- Baleanu, D.; Mustafa, O.G.; O’Regan, D. A Nagumo-like uniqueness theorem for fractional differential equations. J. Phys. Math. Theor. 2011, 44, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Liu, L.; Wu, Y. Positive solutions for a nonlocal fractional differential equation. Nonlinear. Anal. 2011, 74, 3599–3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ford, N.J.; Morgado, M.L. Fractional boundary value problems: Analysis and numerical methods. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2011, 14, 554–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, B.; Nieto, J.J.; Alsaidi, A.; El-Shahed, M. A study nonlinear Langevin equation involving two fractional orders in different interval. Nonlinear. Anal. 2012, 13, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, B.; Ntouyas, S.K. Nonlinear fractional differential equations and inclusions of arbitrary order and multi-strip boundary conditions. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2012, 2012, 98. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, F.; Nieto, J.J.; Zhou, Y. Global attractivity for nonlinear fractional differential equations. Nonlinear. Anal. 2012, 13, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiethelm, K. The Analysis of Fractional Differential Equation; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Kilbas, A.A.; Srivastava, H.M.; Trujillo, H.J. Theory and Application of the Fractional Differential Equations. In North-Holland Mathematics Studies; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 204. [Google Scholar]
- Lakshmikantham, V.; Leela, S.; Devi, J.V. Theory of Fractional Dynamic Systyms; Cambridge Scientific Publishers: Cambridge, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Miller, K.S.; Ross, B. An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Differential Equations; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Podlubny, I. Fractional Differential Equations; Accademic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Samko, S.G.; Kilbas, A.A.; Marichev, O.I. Fractional Integrals and Derivatives; Gordon and Breach Science: Yverdon, Switzerland, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad, B.; Alsaedi, A.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Tariboon, J. Hadamard-Type Fractional Differential Equations. In Inclusions and Inequalities; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, Y. Basic Theory of Fractional Differential Equations; World Scientific Publishing Company: Singapore, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Jackson, F.H. On a q-definite integrals. Quart. J. Pure Appl. Math. 1910, 41, 193–203. [Google Scholar]
- Jackson, F.H. q-Difference equations. Am. J. Math. 1910, 32, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fock, V. Zur theorie des wasserstoffatoms. Z. Physik 1935, 98, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bangerezaka, G. Variational q-calculus. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2004, 289, 650–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asawasamrit, S.; Sudprasert, C.; Ntouyas, S.; Tariboon, J. Some results on quantum Hanh integral inequalities. J. Inequal. Appl. 2019, 2019, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bangerezako, G. Variational calculus on q-nonuniform. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2005, 306, 161–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Exton, H. q-Hypergeometric Functions and Applications; Hastead Press: New York, NY, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Annyby, H.M.; Mansour, S.K. q-fractional Calculus and Equations; Springer: Berlin/Helidelberg, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Ernst, T. A Comprehensive Treatment of q-Calculus; Springer: Basel, Swizterland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Ernst, T. A History of q-Calculus and a New Method; UUDM Report 2000:16; Department of Mathematics, Uppsala University: Uppsala, Sweden, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Ferreira, R.A.C. Nontrivial solutions for fractional q-difference boundary value problems. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2010, 2010, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aslam, M.; Awan, M.U.; Noor, K.I. Quantum Ostrowski inequalities for q-differentiable convex function. J. Math. Inequal. 2016, 10, 1013–1018. [Google Scholar]
- Aral, A.; Gupta, V.; Agarwal, R.P. Applications of q-Calculus in Operator Theory; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Gauchman, H. Integral inequalities in q-calculus. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2002, 47, 281–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kunt, M.; Aljasem, M. Riemann-Liouville fractional quantum Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for convex functions. Konuralp J. Math. 2020, 8, 122–136. [Google Scholar]
- Dobrogowska, A.; Odzijewicz, A. A second order q-difference equation solvable by factorization method. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2006, 193, 319–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gasper, G.; Rahman, M. Some systems of multivariable orthogonal q-Racah polynomials. Ramanujan J. 2007, 13, 389–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ismail, M.E.H.; Simeonov, P. q-Difference operators for orthogonal polynomials. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2009, 233, 749–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bohner, M.; Guseinov, G.S. The h-Laplace and q-Laplace transforms. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2010, 365, 75–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Shahed, M.; Hassan, H.A. Positive solutions of q-difference equation. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 2010, 138, 1733–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, B. Boundary-value problems for nonlinear third-order q-difference equations. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2011, 2011, 94. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad, B.; Alsaedi, A.; Ntouyas, S.K. A study of second-order q-difference equations with boundary conditions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2012, 2012, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Ahmad, B.; Nieto, J.J. On nonlocal boundary value problems of nonlinear q-difference equation. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2012, 2012, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kac, V.; Cheung, P. Quantum Calculus; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Salam, W.A. Some fractional q-integrals and q-derivatives. Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 1967, 15, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agarwal, R.P. Certain fractional q-integrals and q-derivatives. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 1969, 66, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, B.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Purnaras, I.K. Existence results for nonlinear q-difference equations with nonlocal boundary conditions. Comm. Appl. Nonlinear Anal. 2012, 19, 59–72. [Google Scholar]
- El-Shahed, M.; Al-Askar, F. Positive solutions for boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional q-difference equations. ISRN Math. Anal. 2011, 2011, 385459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Ferreira, R.A.C. Positive solutions for a class of boundary value problems with fractional q-difference equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011, 61, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graef, J.R.; Kong, L. Positive solutions for a class of higher order boundary value problems with fractional q-derivative. Appl. Math. Comput. 2012, 218, 9682–9689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, J.; Yang, J. Existence of solutions for multi-point boundary value problem of fractional q-difference equation. Appl. Math. Comput. 2011, 2011, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nuntigrangjana, T.; Putjuso, S.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Tariboon, J. Impulsive quantum (p,q)-difference equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020, 2020, 98. [Google Scholar]
- Chakrabarti, R.; Jagannathan, R. A (p,q)-oscillator realization of two-parameter quantum algebras. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 1991, 24, L711–L718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burban, I. Two-parameter deformation of the oscillator algebra and (p,q)-analog of two-dimensional conformal field theory. J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 1995, 2, 384–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burban, I.M.; Klimyk, A.U. (p,q)-differentiation, (p,q)-integration, and (p,q)-hypergeometric functions related to quantum groups. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 1994, 2, 15–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hounkonnou, M.N.; Désiré, J.; Kyemba, B.R. (p,q)-calculus: Differentiation and integration. SUT J. Math. 2013, 49, 145–167. [Google Scholar]
- Aral, A.; Gupta, V. Applications of (p,q)-gamma function to Szász durrmeyer operators. Publ. de L’Institute Math. 2017, 102, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahai, V.; Yadav, S. Representations of two parameter quantum algebras and (p,q)-special functions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2007, 335, 268–279. [Google Scholar]
- Sadjang, P.N. On the fundamental theorem of (p,q)-calculus and some (p. q)-taylor formulas. Results Math. 2018, 73, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Usman, T.; Saif, M.; Choi, J. Certain identities associated with (p,q)-binomial coefficients and (p,q)-Stirling polynomials of the second kind. Symmetry. 2020, 12, 1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadjang, P.N. On the (p,q)-gamma and the (p,q)-beta functions. arXiv 2015, arXiv:1506.07394. [Google Scholar]
- Sadjang, P.N. On two (p,q)-analogues of the laplace transform. J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 2017, 23, 1562–1583. [Google Scholar]
- Mursaleen, M.; Ansari, K.J.; Khan, A. On (p,q)-analogues of Bernstein operators. Appl. Math. Comput. 2015, 266, 874–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mursaleen, M.; Ansari, K.J.; Khan, A. Erratum to “On (p,q)-analogues of Bernstein operators”. Appl. Math. Comput. 2016, 278, 70–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, S.M.; Rafiq, A.; Acu, A.M.; Ali, F.; Kwun, Y.C. Erratum to “Some approximation properties of (p,q)-Bernstein operators”. J. Inequal. Appl. 2016, 2016, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mursaleen, M.; Khan, F.; Khan, A. Approximation by (p,q)-Lorentz polynomials on a compact disk. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory. 2016, 10, 1725–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Q.-B.; Zhou, G. On (p,q)-analogues of Kantorovich type Bernstein-Stancu-Schurer operator. Appl. Math. Comput. 2016, 276, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mursaleen, M.; Ansari, K.J.; Khan, A. Some approximation results of (p,q)-analogues of Bernstein-Stancu operators. Appl. Math. Comput. 2015, 264, 392–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acar, T.; Aral, A.; Mohiuddine, S.A. On Kantorovich modification of (p,q)-Baskakov operators. J. Inequal. Appl. 2016, 2016, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mursaleen, M.; Nasiruzzaman, M.; Khan, F.; Khan, A. (p,q)-analogues of divided difference and Bernstein operators. J. Nonlinear Funct. Anal. 2017, 2017, 25. [Google Scholar]
- Wachs, M.; White, D. (p,q)-Stirling numbers and set partition statistics. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A. 1991, 56, 27–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wachs, M.L. σ-restricted growth functions and (p,q)-Stirling numbers. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 1994, 68, 470–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Remmel, J.B.; Wachs, M. Rook theory, generalized Stirling numbers and (p,q)-analogues. Electron. J. Combin. 2004, 11, R84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Médics, A.D.; Leroux, P. Generalized Stirling numbers, convolution formula and (p,q)-analogues. Can. J. Math. 1995, 11, 474–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bukweli-Kyemba, J.D.; Hounkonnou, M.N. Quantum deformed algebra: Coherent states and special functions. arXiv 2013, arXiv:1301.0116v1. [Google Scholar]
- Prabseang, J.; Nonlaopon, K.; Tariboon, J. (p,q)-Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for double integral and (p,q)-differentiable convex functions. Axioms 2019, 8, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalsoom, H.; Amer, M.; Junjua, M.D.; Hassain, S.; Shahxadi, G. (p,q)-estimates of Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for coordinated convex and quasi convex function. Mathematics 2019, 7, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamsrisuk, N.; Promsakon, C.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Tariboon, J. Nonlocal boundary value problems for (p,q)-difference equations. J. Differ. Equ. 2018, 10, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Promsakon, C.; Kamsrisuk, N.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Tariboon, J. On the second-order (p,q)-difference equation with separated boundary conditions. Adv. Math. Phys. 2018, 2018, 9089865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soontharanon, J.; Sitthiwirattham, T. On fractional (p,q)-calculus. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020, 2020, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gradimir, V.M.; Vijay, G.N.M. (p,q)-beta functions and applications in approximation. Bol. Soc. Mat. Mex. 2018, 24, 219–237. [Google Scholar]
- Tun, M.; Gov, E. Some integral inequalities via (p,q)-calculus on finite intervals. RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll. 2016, 19, 95. [Google Scholar]
- Krasnoselskii, M.A. Two remarks on the method of successive approximations. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk. 1995, 10, 123–127. [Google Scholar]
- Granas, A.; Dugundji, J. Fixed Point Theory and Applications; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).