Next Article in Journal
On the Design of Power Law Filters and Their Inverse Counterparts
Next Article in Special Issue
A Novel Treatment of Fuzzy Fractional Swift–Hohenberg Equation for a Hybrid Transform within the Fractional Derivative Operator
Previous Article in Journal
Hilfer–Hadamard Fractional Boundary Value Problems with Nonlocal Mixed Boundary Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Approximate Solution of the Time-Fractional Two-Mode Coupled Burgers Equation

1
School of Liberal Studies, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar University Delhi, Delhi 110006, India
2
School of Mathematics and Information Science, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454150, China
3
National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, College of Textile and Clothing Engineering, Soochow University, 199 Ren-Ai Road, Suzhou 215301, China
4
Department of Mathematics, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fractal Fract. 2021, 5(4), 196; https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5040196
Submission received: 14 October 2021 / Revised: 30 October 2021 / Accepted: 2 November 2021 / Published: 4 November 2021

Abstract

:
In this paper, we consider the time-fractional two-mode coupled Burgers equation with the Caputo fractional derivative. A modified homotopy perturbation method coupled with Laplace transform (He-Laplace method) is applied to find its approximate analytical solution. The method is to decompose the equation into a series of linear equations, which can be effectively and easily solved by the Laplace transform. The solution process is illustrated step by step, and the results show that the present method is extremely powerful for fractional differential equations.

1. Introduction

The classical Burgers equation, introduced by Bateman [1], is a fundamental model in viscous fluid mechanics. In fact, it is widely used to express different physical phenomenon like shock waves, dispersion in porous media, modelling of gas dynamics, traffic flow and so on [2,3,4,5,6]. The partial differential equations that are first-order in time model the right-moving unidirectional waves in the positive x-direction. A new nonlinear PDE of second-order in time which model both left- and right- going waves are called two-mode equations. Korunsky [7] was the first one to introduce two-mode KdV equation in the scaled form as
u t t α 2 u x x + ( t μ α x ) u x x x + ( t λ α x ) u u x = 0 ,
where x , t R , α > 0 , | λ | 1 , | μ | 1 , u ( x , t ) is a field function and represents the height of the water’s free surface above a flat bottom. λ , μ and α are the parameters of nonlinearity, dispersion and phase velocities respectively. This two-mode KdV equation describes the propagation of two different wave modes in the same direction simultaneously, with the same dispersion relation but different parameters of phase velocities, nonlinearity and dispersion. In 2016, Wazwaz [8] used the sense of Korunsky to introduce a new two-mode Burgers equation (TMBE) in the scaled for as
u t t α 2 u x x + ( t μ α x ) u x x + ( t λ α x ) u u x = 0
where λ ,   μ ,   α are as defined earlier.
However, it is very rare that a real life model can be represented by a single partial differential equation, therefore, a couple of partial differential equations are required to provide a complete model. This idea of Korunsky and Wazwaz was further generalized by Jaradat [9], where he introduced a new two-mode coupled Burgers equation (TMCBE) which has the form
u t t α 2 u x x a 1 ( t μ α x ) u x x b 1 ( t λ α x ) u u x + c 1 ( t μ α x ) ( u v ) x = 0 , v t t α 2 v x x a 2 ( t μ α x ) v x x b 2 ( t λ α x ) v v x + c 2 ( t μ α x ) ( u v ) x = 0 .
It can be observed that if we put α = 0 in Equation (1) and integrate with respect to the variable t once, we obtain the standard coupled Burgers equation (see [10]).
The study of coupled Burgers equations is very important in the sense that it describes the sedimentation of polydispersive suspension under the effect of gravity [11].
Fractional differential equations involve real or complex order derivatives. They provide more accurate models of the real world problems than the integer order differential equations (for detail [12,13,14,15]). Due to the vast applications of fractional calculus in various disciplines of Science and Engineering, there has been significant growth in its literature in the last few decades. In this paper, we extend the time-derivative in Equation (1) with the fractional derivative. Thus, for 1 / 2 < ξ 1 , the modified fractional version of Equation (1) obtained is given by the following.
D t 2 ξ u α 2 u x x a 1 ( D t ξ μ α x ) u x x b 1 ( D t ξ λ α x ) u u x + c 1 ( D t ξ μ α x ) ( u v ) x = 0 , D t 2 ξ v α 2 v x x a 2 ( D t ξ μ α x ) v x x b 2 ( D t ξ λ α x ) v v x + c 2 ( D t ξ μ α x ) ( u v ) x = 0 .
where the fractional derivative D t ξ may be considered as Caputo fractional derivative as defined in Definition 2 in Section 2. The Equation (2) can be rewritten as
D t 2 ξ u = D t ξ ( a 1 u x x + b 1 u u x c 1 ( u v ) x ) + α 2 u x x a 1 μ α u x x x b 1 λ α ( u u x ) x + c 1 μ α ( u v ) x x , D t 2 ξ v = D t ξ ( a 2 v x x + b 2 v v x c 2 ( u v ) x ) + α 2 v x x a 2 μ α v x x x b 2 λ α ( v v x ) x + c 2 μ α ( u v ) x x .
Explicit solutions to the fractional problems involving Burgers equation are rare and possibly non-existent in the literature. Therefore, it is more desirable to look for new techniques to get solutions of fractional differential equations. Methods like Adomian Decomposition Method, Iteration Method, Homotopy Analysis Method, Homotopy Perturbation Method, and Laplace Transform Methods are some of very powerful and useful techniques [16,17,18,19,20,21]. The combination of Laplace Transform and Homotopy Perturbation Method is a new tool which is being used to solve linear and nonlinear fractional differential equations [22].
The paper is organised as follows: Section 2 consists of the definitions and theory required for rest of the paper. In Section 3, we apply Laplace homotopy perturbation method to the considered nonlinear time-fractional model. In Section 4, we discuss a concrete example of main equation and demonstrate the solution graphically. The last section concludes this paper.

2. Definitions and Mathematical Preliminaries

There are various versions of fractional derivatives given by different authors and new definitions have been proposed in recent decades. Here we give the Caputo definition of fractional derivative. Please refer to the books [23,24,25] for the detailed theory of fractional calculus.
Definition 1.
The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order ξ for a locally integerable function f of two variables is defined by
J t ξ f ( x , t ) = 1 Γ ( ξ ) 0 t ( t s ) ξ 1 f ( x , s ) d s , ξ > 0 ,
and
J t 0 f ( x , t ) = f ( x , t ) ,
where Γ denotes the Gamma function.
Definition 2.
The Caputo fractional derivative of order ξ of a m-times continuously differentiable function which is locally integerable function f is defined by
D t ξ f ( x , t ) = 1 Γ ( m ξ ) 0 t ( t k ) m ξ 1 f ( m ) ( x , k ) d k ,
where m 1 < ξ m .
In particular, for 0 < ξ 1 , we have
D t ξ f ( x , t ) = 1 Γ ( 1 ξ ) 0 t ( t k ) ξ f ( x , k ) d k .
Definition 3.
The Laplace transform of the Caputo fractional derivative is given by
L D t ξ g ( x , t ) ( p ) = 1 p m ξ [ p m L g ( x , t ) ( p ) p m 1 g ( x , 0 ) g ( m 1 ) ( x , 0 ) ] ,
In particular, for 0 < ξ 1 , we have
L D t ξ g ( x , t ) ( p ) = p ξ L g ( x , t ) ( p ) p ξ 1 g ( x , 0 ) .

3. Existence and Uniqueness

Let Ω be a bounded interval of real numbers and T be a constant such that 0 < T < . We establish the existence and uniqueness of the solution of the system (3) in this section. Consider the Banach space of real-valued continuous functions defined on Ω ¯ × [ 0 , T ] (that is, C ( Ω ¯ × [ 0 , T ] ) ) with norm given by
u = max ( x , t ) Ω ¯ × [ 0 , T ] | u ( x , t ) | .
Apply the integral operator J t 2 ξ on both sides of each equation in system (3), to have
u ( x , t ) u ( x , 0 ) = J t ξ τ 1 ( x , t , u ) + J t 2 ξ τ 2 ( x , t , u ) , v ( x , t ) v ( x , 0 ) = J t ξ τ 3 ( x , t , v ) + J t 2 ξ τ 4 ( x , t , v ) ,
where
τ 1 ( x , t , u ) = a 1 u x x + b 1 u u x c 1 ( u v ) x , τ 2 ( x , t , u ) = α 2 u x x a 1 μ α u x x x b 1 λ α ( u u x ) x + c 1 μ α ( u v ) x x , τ 3 ( x , t , v ) = a 2 v x x + b 2 v v x c 2 ( u v ) x , τ 4 ( x , t , v ) = α 2 v x x a 2 μ α v x x x b 2 λ α ( v v x ) x + c 2 μ α ( u v ) x x .
If we assume that u m 1 ,   w m 2 ,   v m 3 , v x m 4 ,   ( u w ) x x δ 1 u w ,   ( u 2 w 2 ) x δ 2 u 2 w 2 δ 2 ( m 1 + m 2 ) u w ,   ( u w ) x δ 3 u w , for m 1 , m 2 , m 3 , m 4 , δ 1 , δ 2 , δ 3 0 , then τ 1 ( x , t , u ) satisfy the Lipschitz condition. For, let u ( x , t ) and w ( x , t ) be any two arbitrary functions bounded above, then we have
τ 1 ( x , t , u ) τ 1 ( x , t , w ) = a 1 ( u x x w x x ) + b 1 2 ( u 2 w 2 ) x c 1 ( u x v + u v x ) + c 1 ( w x v + w v x ) a 1 ( u w ) x x + b 1 2 ( ( u + w ) ( u w ) ) x + c 1 ( u w ) x v + c 1 ( u w ) v x δ 1 | a 1 | u w + δ 2 ( m 1 + m 2 ) | b 1 | 2 u w + ( m 3 δ 3 + m 4 ) | c 1 | u w = L 1 u w ,
where L 1 = | a 1 | δ 1 + | b 1 2 | δ 2 ( m 1 + m 2 ) + | c 1 | ( m 3 δ 3 + m 4 ) is the Lipschitz constant. Similarly, it can be shown that there exist Lipschitz constants L 2 , L 3 and L 4 for τ 2 ( x , t , u ) , τ 3 ( x , t , v ) and τ 4 ( x , t , v ) respectively. Thus, we note that if u ( x , t ) and v ( x , t ) are bounded above, then
τ 1 ( x , t , u ) τ 1 ( x , t , w ) L 1 u w , τ 2 ( x , t , u ) τ 2 ( x , t , w ) L 2 u w , τ 3 ( x , t , v ) τ 3 ( x , t , y ) L 3 v y , τ 4 ( x , t , v ) τ 4 ( x , t , y ) L 4 v y .
where L i 0 , i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , are Lipschitz constants.

3.1. Existence of the Solution

Using the definition of integral operator (1), we construct the following iterative formula for the system (4)
u n + 1 ( x , t ) = 1 Γ ( ξ ) 0 t ( t k ) ξ 1 τ 1 ( x , k , u n ) d k , + 1 Γ ( 2 ξ ) 0 t ( t k ) 2 ξ 1 τ 2 ( x , k , u n ) d k , v n + 1 ( x , t ) = 1 Γ ( ξ ) 0 t ( t k ) ξ 1 τ 3 ( x , k , v n ) d k , + 1 Γ ( 2 ξ ) 0 t ( t k ) 2 ξ 1 τ 4 ( x , k , v n ) d k .
Let the differences between successive terms be given by Ξ n ( x , t ) = u n ( x , t ) u n 1 ( x , t ) and Θ n ( x , t ) = v n ( x , t ) v n 1 ( x , t ) , then we have
u n ( x , t ) = j = 0 n Ξ j ( x , t ) ,
v n ( x , t ) = j = 0 n Θ j ( x , t ) .
Now, we consider
Ξ n ( x , t ) = u n ( x , t ) u n 1 ( x , t ) = 1 Γ ( ξ ) 0 t ( t k ) ξ 1 [ τ 1 ( x , k , u n 1 ) τ 1 ( x , k , u n 2 ) ] d k , + 1 Γ ( 2 ξ ) 0 t ( t k ) 2 ξ 1 [ τ 2 ( x , k , u n ) τ 2 ( x , k , u n 2 ) ] d k , L 1 Γ ( ξ ) u n 1 u n 2 t ξ ξ + L 2 Γ ( 2 ξ ) u n 1 u n 2 t 2 ξ 2 ξ [ L 1 T ξ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) + L 2 T 2 ξ Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) ] u n 1 u n 2 .
Let γ : = L 1 T ξ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) + L 2 T 2 ξ Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) < 1 , then
Ξ n ( x , t ) < γ u n 1 u n 2 < γ 2 u n 2 u n 3 · · · < γ n u 0 .
Therefore, u n ( x , t ) = j = 0 n Ξ j ( x , t ) exists and is smooth. Similarly, it can be shown that v n ( x , t ) = j = 0 n Θ j ( x , t ) exists and is smooth.

3.2. Uniqueness

Let u ( x , t ) and r ( x , t ) are two solutions, then
u ( x , t ) r ( x , t ) = 1 Γ ( ξ ) 0 t ( t k ) ξ 1 [ τ 1 ( x , k , u ) τ 1 ( x , k , r ) ] d k + 1 Γ ( 2 ξ ) 0 t ( t k ) 2 ξ 1 [ τ 2 ( x , k , u ) τ 2 ( x , k , r ) ] d k .
u ( x , t ) r ( x , t ) [ L 1 T ξ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) + L 2 T 2 ξ Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) ] u ( x , t ) r ( x , t ) ,
that is
( 1 L 1 T ξ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) L 2 T 2 ξ Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) ) u ( x , t ) r ( x , t ) 0 .
If we assume that 1 L 1 T ξ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) L 2 T 2 ξ Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) > 0 , then
u ( x , t ) r ( x , t ) = 0 u ( x , t ) = r ( x , t ) .
Similarly, we can prove the uniqueness of v ( x , t ) .
Hence, system (3) has a unique solution.

4. Solution of Two Mode Coupled Burgers Equations

We consider the nonlinear coupled fractional partial differential Equation (3) and apply Laplace Homotopy Perturbation Method [19,26,27,28]. Now, applying Laplace transform in Equation (3) with respect to the variable t and using the Laplace transform of Caputo fractional derivative, we get
U ( x , p ) = 1 p 2 ξ L α 2 u x x a 1 μ α u x x x b 1 λ α ( u u x ) x + c 1 μ α ( u v ) x x , + 1 p ξ L a 1 u x x + b 1 u u x c 1 ( u v ) x 1 p ξ + 1 [ a 1 u x x + b 1 u u x c 1 ( u v ) x ] ( x , 0 ) + u ( x , 0 ) p + u t ( x , 0 ) p 2 . V ( x , p ) = 1 p 2 ξ L α 2 v x x a 2 μ α v x x x b 2 λ α ( v v x ) x + c 2 μ α ( u v ) x x + 1 p ξ L a 2 v x x + b 2 v v x c 2 ( u v ) x 1 p ξ + 1 [ a 2 v x x + b 2 v v x c 2 ( u v ) x ] ( x , 0 ) + v ( x , 0 ) p + v t ( x , 0 ) p 2 ,
where L u ( x , t ) = U ( x , p ) , L v ( x , t ) = V ( x , p ) . We construct the homotopy for the Equation (6) as follows.
U ( x , p ) = h p 2 ξ L α 2 u x x a 1 μ α u x x x b 1 λ α ( u u x ) x + c 1 μ α ( u v ) x x + h p ξ L a 1 u x x + b 1 u u x c 1 ( u v ) x 1 p ξ + 1 [ a 1 u x x + b 1 u u x c 1 ( u v ) x ] ( x , 0 ) + u ( x , 0 ) p + u t ( x , 0 ) p 2 . V ( x , p ) = h p 2 ξ L α 2 v x x a 2 μ α v x x x b 2 λ α ( v v x ) x + c 2 μ α ( u v ) x x + h p ξ L a 2 v x x + b 2 v v x c 2 ( u v ) x 1 p ξ + 1 [ a 2 v x x + b 2 v v x c 2 ( u v ) x ] ( x , 0 ) + v ( x , 0 ) p + v t ( x , 0 ) p 2 .
Let
U ( x , p ) = m = 0 h m U m ( x , p ) , V ( x , p ) = m = 0 h m V m ( x , p ) ,
or
u ( x , t ) = m = 0 h m u m ( x , t ) , v ( x , t ) = m = 0 h m v m ( x , t ) ,
where L u m ( x , t ) = U m ( x , p ) , L v m ( x , t ) = V m ( x , p ) . Substituting Equation (8) into Equation (7), we have
m = 0 h m U m ( x , p ) = h p 2 ξ L α 2 m = 0 h m u m x x a 1 μ α m = 0 h m u m x x x b 1 λ α m = 0 h m ( k = 0 m u k u ( m k ) x ) x + c 1 μ α m = 0 h m ( k = 0 m u k v m k ) x x + h p ξ L a 1 m = 0 h m u m x x + b 1 m = 0 h m k = 0 m u k u ( m k ) x c 1 m = 0 h m ( k = 0 m u k v m k ) x [ a 1 u x x + b 1 u u x c 1 ( u v ) x ] ( x , 0 ) p ξ + 1 + u ( x , 0 ) p + u t ( x , 0 ) p 2 . m = 0 h m V m ( x , p ) = h p 2 ξ L α 2 m = 0 h m v m x x a 2 μ α m = 0 h m v m x x x b 2 λ α m = 0 h m ( k = 0 m v k v ( m k ) x ) x + c 2 μ α m = 0 h m ( k = 0 m u k v m k ) x x + h p ξ L a 2 m = 0 h m v m x x + b 2 m = 0 h m k = 0 m v k v ( m k ) x c 2 m = 0 h m ( k = 0 m u k v m k ) x [ a 2 v x x + b 2 v v x c 2 ( u v ) x ] ( x , 0 ) p ξ + 1 + v ( x , 0 ) p + v t ( x , 0 ) p 2 .
Now comparing the corresponding powers of h in (10), we get the following homotopies.
h 0 : U 0 ( x , p ) = u ( x , 0 ) p + u t ( x , 0 ) p 2 1 p ξ + 1 [ a 1 u x x ( x , 0 ) + b 1 u ( x , 0 ) u x ( x , 0 ) c 1 ( u ( x , 0 ) v ( x , 0 ) ) x ] V 0 ( x , p ) = v ( x , 0 ) p + v t ( x , 0 ) p 2 1 p ξ + 1 [ a 2 v x x ( x , 0 ) + b 2 v ( x , 0 ) v x ( x , 0 ) c 2 ( u ( x , 0 ) v ( x , 0 ) ) x ] , h 1 : U 1 ( x , p ) = 1 p 2 ξ L α 2 u 0 x x a 1 μ α u 0 x x x b 1 λ α ( u 0 u 0 x ) x + c 1 μ α ( u 0 v 0 ) x x + 1 p ξ L a 1 u 0 x x + b 1 u 0 u 0 x c 1 ( u 0 v 0 ) x , V 1 ( x , p ) = 1 p 2 ξ L α 2 v 0 x x a 2 μ α v 0 x x x b 2 λ α ( v 0 v 0 x ) x + c 2 μ α ( u 0 v 0 ) x x , + 1 p ξ L a 2 v 0 x x + b 2 v 0 v 0 x c 2 ( u 0 v 0 ) x ,
h 2 : U 2 ( x , p ) = 1 p 2 ξ L α 2 u 1 x x a 1 μ α u 1 x x x b 1 λ α ( u 0 u 1 x + u 1 u 0 x ) x + c 1 μ α ( u 0 v 1 + u 1 v 0 ) x x + 1 p ξ L a 1 u 1 x x + b 1 ( u 0 u 1 x + u 1 u 0 x ) c 1 ( u 0 v 1 + u 1 v 0 ) x , V 2 ( x , p ) = 1 p 2 ξ L α 2 v 1 x x a 2 μ α v 1 x x x b 2 λ α ( v 0 v 1 x + v 1 v 0 x ) x + c 2 μ α ( u 0 v 1 + u 1 v 0 ) x x + 1 p ξ L a 2 v 1 x x + b 2 ( v 0 v 1 x + v 1 v 0 x ) c 2 ( u 0 v 1 + u 1 v 0 ) x ,
and so on. In fact, we can rewrite the above system of equations as
U 0 ( x , p ) = u ( x , 0 ) p + u t ( x , 0 ) p 2 1 p ξ + 1 [ a 1 u x x ( x , 0 ) + b 1 u ( x , 0 ) u x ( x , 0 ) c 1 ( u ( x , 0 ) v ( x , 0 ) ) x ] V 0 ( x , p ) = v ( x , 0 ) p + v t ( x , 0 ) p 2 1 p ξ + 1 [ a 2 v x x ( x , 0 ) + b 2 v ( x , 0 ) v x ( x , 0 ) c 2 ( u ( x , 0 ) v ( x , 0 ) ) x ] ,
U k + 1 ( x , p ) = 1 p 2 ξ L α 2 u k x x a 1 μ α u k x x x b 1 λ α ( j = 0 k u j u k j x ) x + c 1 μ α ( j = 0 k u j v k j ) x x + 1 p ξ L a 1 u k x x + b 1 j = 0 k u j u k j x c 1 ( j = 0 k u j v k j ) x V k + 1 ( x , p ) = 1 p 2 ξ L α 2 v k x x a 2 μ α v k x x x b 2 λ α ( j = 0 k v j v k j x ) x + c 2 μ α ( j = 0 k u j v k j ) x x + 1 p ξ L a 2 v k x x + b 2 j = 0 k v j v k j x c 2 ( j = 0 k u j v k j ) x
for k = 0 , 1 , 2 ,
Now applying the inverse laplace transform in each of the above equations, we obtain u 0 , v 0 , u 1 , v 1 , u 2 , v 2 and so on.
Hence, we get an approximate solution of Equation (2) as
u ( x , t ) = u 0 ( x , t ) + u 1 ( x , t ) + u 2 ( x , t ) +
and
v ( x , t ) = v 0 ( x , t ) + v 1 ( x , t ) + v 2 ( x , t ) +

5. Convergence Analysis

We discuss the convergence of the solution of given problem in the following theorem.
Theorem 1.
Let u n ( x , t ) , v n ( x , t ) , u ( x , t ) and v ( x , t ) be in the Banach space C ( Ω ¯ × [ 0 , T ] ) as defined by Equation (9). If there exist constants 0 < β u < 1 , 0 < β v < 1 such that u n ( x , t ) β u u n 1 ( x , t ) , v n ( x , t ) β v v n 1 ( x , t ) for all n N , then the infinite series k = 0 u k ( x , t ) and k = 0 v k ( x , t ) converge to the solution u ( x , t ) and v ( x , t ) of the problem (2).
Proof. 
Let S n and R n be the sequence of partial sums of the series k = 0 u k ( x , t ) and k = 0 v k ( x , t ) respectively. For all n N , we have
S n ( x , t ) S n 1 ( x , t ) = u n ( x , t ) β u u n 1 ( x , t ) β u 2 u n 2 ( x , t ) β u n u 0 ( x , t ) ,
So that
S n ( x , t ) S m ( x , t ) = ( S n ( x , t ) S n 1 ( x , t ) ) + ( S n 1 ( x , t ) S n 2 ( x , t ) ) + + ( S m + 1 ( x , t ) S m ( x , t ) ) = u n ( x , t ) + u n 1 ( x , t ) + + u m + 1 ( x , t ) β u m + 1 ( 1 + β u + β u 2 + + β u n m 1 ) u 0 ( x , t ) ,
which implies
| S n ( x , t ) S m ( x , t ) | β u m + 1 ( 1 β u n m ) ( 1 β u ) max ( x , t ) Ω ¯ × [ 0 , T ] | u 0 ( x , t ) | .
Now, 0 < β u < 1 implies that 1 β u n m < 1 , then
S n S m β u m + 1 ( 1 β u ) max ( x , t ) Ω ¯ × [ 0 , T ] | v 0 ( x , t ) | .
Since, v 0 is bounded, we get
lim n , m S n S m = 0 .
Thus the sequence ( S n ) is Cauchy in the Banach space C ( Ω ¯ × [ 0 , T ] ) and hence convergent. Similarly, we can show that the sequence ( R n ) is convergent. Hence, that the infinite series k = 0 u k ( x , t ) and k = 0 v k ( x , t ) converge to u ( x , t ) and v ( x , t ) respectively. □

6. An Illustrative Example

We consider the nonlinear coupled fractional partial differential Equation (3) along with the initial conditions given as
u ( x , 0 ) = v ( x , 0 ) = sin x , u x ( x , 0 ) = v x ( x , 0 ) = cos x ,
u x x ( x , 0 ) = v x x ( x , 0 ) = sin x , u t ( x , 0 ) = v t ( x , 0 ) = sin x .
Now solving the system (3) by Laplace Homotopy Perturbation Method, we have
U 0 ( x , p ) = sin x p sin x p 2 a 1 sin x + b 1 sin x cos x c 1 sin 2 x p ξ + 1 V 0 ( x , p ) = sin x p sin x p 2 a 2 sin x + b 2 sin x cos x c 2 sin 2 x p ξ + 1
Taking inverse Laplace transform of above equations, we get
u 0 ( x , t ) = sin x t sin x t ξ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) ( a 1 sin x + b 1 sin x cos x c 1 sin 2 x ) v 0 ( x , t ) = sin x t sin x t ξ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) ( a 2 sin x + b 2 sin x cos x c 2 sin 2 x )
Next, we have
U 1 ( x , p ) = α 2 sin x p 2 ξ + 1 + sin x p 2 ξ + 2 a 1 sin x + ( 4 c 1 2 b 1 ) sin 2 x p 3 ξ + 1 a 1 μ α cos x p 2 ξ + 1 + cos x p 2 ξ + 2 a 1 cos x + 2 ( 4 c 1 2 b 1 ) cos 2 x p 3 ξ + 1 b 1 λ α cos 2 x ( 1 p 2 ξ + 1 2 p 2 ξ + 2 + 2 p 2 ξ + 3 ) + ( ξ + 1 p 3 ξ + 2 1 p 3 ξ + 1 ) ( a 1 cos 2 x + b 1 ( cos 3 x 2 sin 2 x cos x ) c 1 ( 2 cos 2 x cos x sin 2 x sin x ) ) + ( ξ + 1 p 3 ξ + 2 1 p 3 ξ + 1 ) ( a 1 cos 2 x + ( b 1 2 c 1 ) ( cos 2 x cos x 2 sin 2 x sin x ) ) + Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) Γ ( ξ + 1 ) 2 p 4 ξ + 1 [ ( a 1 cos x + b 1 cos 2 x 2 c 1 cos 2 x ) 2 + ( a 1 sin x + b 1 sin x cos x c 1 sin 2 x ) ( a 1 sin x 2 b 1 sin 2 x + 4 c 1 sin 2 x ) ] + c 1 μ α 2 cos 2 x ( 1 p 2 ξ + 1 2 p 2 ξ + 2 + 2 p 2 ξ + 3 ) + ( ξ + 1 p 3 ξ + 2 1 p 3 ξ + 1 ) ( 2 a 1 cos 2 x + b 1 ( 2 cos 3 x 7 sin 2 x cos x ) c 1 ( 4 cos 2 x cos x 5 sin 2 x sin x ) ) + ( ξ + 1 p 3 ξ + 2 1 p 3 ξ + 1 ) ( 2 a 2 cos 2 x + b 2 ( 2 cos 3 x 7 sin 2 x cos x ) c 2 ( 4 cos 2 x cos x 5 sin 2 x sin x ) ) + Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) Γ ( ξ + 1 ) 2 p 4 ξ + 1 [ 2 ( a 1 cos x + ( b 1 2 c 1 ) cos 2 x ) ( a 2 cos x + ( b 2 2 c 2 ) cos 2 x ) + ( a 1 sin x 2 ( b 1 2 c 1 ) sin 2 x ) ( a 2 sin x + b 2 sin x cos x c 2 sin 2 x ) + ( a 1 sin x + b 1 sin x cos x c 1 sin 2 x ) ( a 2 sin x 2 ( b 2 2 c 2 ) sin 2 x ) ] + a 1 sin x p ξ + 1 + sin x p ξ + 2 a 1 sin x + ( 4 c 1 2 b 1 ) sin 2 x p 2 ξ + 1 + b 1 cos x sin x ( 1 p ξ + 1 2 p ξ + 2 + 2 p ξ + 3 ) + ( ξ + 1 p 2 ξ + 2 1 p 2 ξ + 1 ) ( a 1 sin x cos x
+ b 1 sin x cos 2 x c 1 sin 2 x cos x ) + ( ξ + 1 p 2 ξ + 2 1 p 2 ξ + 1 ) ( a 1 sin x cos x + ( b 1 2 c 1 ) ( cos 2 x sin x ) ) + Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) Γ ( ξ + 1 ) 2 p 3 ξ + 1 [ ( a 1 cos x + b 1 cos 2 x 2 c 1 cos 2 x ) ( a 1 sin x + b 1 sin x cos x c 1 sin 2 x ) ] c 1 sin 2 x ( 1 p ξ + 1 2 p ξ + 2 + 2 p ξ + 3 ) + ( ξ + 1 p 2 ξ + 2 1 p 2 ξ + 1 ) ( a 1 sin 2 x + b 1 ( 2 sin x cos 2 x sin 3 x ) c 1 ( 2 cos 2 x sin x + sin 2 x cos x ) ) + ( ξ + 1 p 2 ξ + 2 1 p 2 ξ + 1 ) ( a 2 sin 2 x + b 2 ( 2 sin x cos 2 x sin 3 x ) c 2 ( 2 cos 2 x sin x + sin 2 x cos x ) ) + Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) Γ ( ξ + 1 ) 2 p 3 ξ + 1 [ ( a 1 cos x + ( b 1 2 c 1 ) cos 2 x ) ( a 2 sin x + b 2 sin x cos x c 2 sin 2 x ) ( a 2 cos x + ( b 2 2 c 2 ) cos 2 x ) ( a 1 sin x + b 1 sin x cos x c 1 sin 2 x ) ]
V 1 ( x , p ) = α 2 sin x p 2 ξ + 1 + sin x p 2 ξ + 2 a 2 sin x + ( 4 c 2 2 b 2 ) sin 2 x p 3 ξ + 1 a 2 μ α cos x p 2 ξ + 1 + cos x p 2 ξ + 2 a 2 cos x + 2 ( 4 c 2 2 b 2 ) cos 2 x p 3 ξ + 1 b 2 λ α cos 2 x ( 1 p 2 ξ + 1 2 p 2 ξ + 2 + 2 p 2 ξ + 3 ) + ( ξ + 1 p 3 ξ + 2 1 p 3 ξ + 1 ) ( a 2 cos 2 x + b 2 ( cos 3 x 2 sin 2 x cos x ) c 2 ( 2 cos 2 x cos x sin 2 x sin x ) ) + ( ξ + 1 p 3 ξ + 2 1 p 3 ξ + 1 ) ( a 2 cos 2 x + ( b 2 2 c 2 ) ( cos 2 x cos x 2 sin 2 x sin x ) ) + Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) Γ ( ξ + 1 ) 2 p 4 ξ + 1 [ ( a 2 cos x + b 2 cos 2 x 2 c 2 cos 2 x ) 2 + ( a 2 sin x + b 2 sin x cos x c 2 sin 2 x ) ( a 2 sin x 2 b 2 sin 2 x + 4 c 2 sin 2 x ) ] + c 2 μ α 2 cos 2 x ( 1 p 2 ξ + 1 2 p 2 ξ + 2 + 2 p 2 ξ + 3 ) + ( ξ + 1 p 3 ξ + 2 1 p 3 ξ + 1 ) ( 2 a 1 cos 2 x + b 1 ( 2 cos 3 x 7 sin 2 x cos x ) c 1 ( 4 cos 2 x cos x 5 sin 2 x sin x ) ) + ( ξ + 1 p 3 ξ + 2 1 p 3 ξ + 1 ) ( 2 a 2 cos 2 x + b 2 ( 2 cos 3 x 7 sin 2 x cos x ) c 2 ( 4 cos 2 x cos x 5 sin 2 x sin x ) ) + Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) Γ ( ξ + 1 ) 2 p 4 ξ + 1 [ 2 ( a 1 cos x + ( b 1 2 c 1 ) cos 2 x ) ( a 2 cos x + ( b 2 2 c 2 ) cos 2 x )
+ ( a 1 sin x 2 ( b 1 2 c 1 ) sin 2 x ) ( a 2 sin x + b 2 sin x cos x c 2 sin 2 x ) + ( a 1 sin x + b 1 sin x cos x c 1 sin 2 x ) ( a 2 sin x 2 ( b 2 2 c 2 ) sin 2 x ) ] + a 2 sin x p ξ + 1 + sin x p ξ + 2 a 2 sin x + ( 4 c 2 2 b 2 ) sin 2 x p 2 ξ + 1 + b 2 cos x sin x ( 1 p ξ + 1 2 p ξ + 2 + 2 p ξ + 3 ) + ( ξ + 1 p 2 ξ + 2 1 p 2 ξ + 1 ) ( a 2 sin x cos x + b 2 sin x cos 2 x c 2 sin 2 x cos x ) + ( ξ + 1 p 2 ξ + 2 1 p 2 ξ + 1 ) ( a 2 sin x cos x + ( b 2 2 c 2 ) ( cos 2 x sin x ) ) + Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) Γ ( ξ + 1 ) 2 p 3 ξ + 1 [ ( a 2 cos x + b 2 cos 2 x 2 c 2 cos 2 x ) ( a 2 sin x + b 2 sin x cos x c 2 sin 2 x ) ] c 1 sin 2 x ( 1 p ξ + 1 2 p ξ + 2 + 2 p ξ + 3 ) + ( ξ + 1 p 2 ξ + 2 1 p 2 ξ + 1 ) ( a 1 sin 2 x + b 1 ( 2 sin x cos 2 x sin 3 x ) c 1 ( 2 cos 2 x sin x + sin 2 x cos x ) ) + ( ξ + 1 p 2 ξ + 2 1 p 2 ξ + 1 ) ( a 2 sin 2 x + b 2 ( 2 sin x cos 2 x sin 3 x ) c 2 ( 2 cos 2 x sin x + sin 2 x cos x ) ) + Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) Γ ( ξ + 1 ) 2 p 3 ξ + 1 [ ( a 1 cos x + ( b 1 2 c 1 ) cos 2 x ) ( a 2 sin x + b 2 sin x cos x c 2 sin 2 x ) ( a 2 cos x + ( b 2 2 c 2 ) cos 2 x ) ( a 1 sin x + b 1 sin x cos x c 1 sin 2 x ) ]
Taking inverse Laplace transform, we get
u 1 ( x , t ) = α 2 t 2 ξ sin x Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) + t 2 ξ + 1 sin x Γ 2 ξ + 2 ( a 1 sin x + ( 4 c 1 2 b 1 ) sin 2 x ) t 3 ξ Γ ( 3 ξ + 1 ) a 1 μ α t 2 ξ cos x Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) + t 2 ξ + 1 cos x Γ 2 ξ + 2 ( a 1 cos x + ( 4 c 1 2 b 1 ) cos 2 x ) t 3 ξ Γ ( 3 ξ + 1 ) b 1 λ α cos 2 x ( t 2 ξ Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) 2 t 2 ξ + 1 Γ ( 2 ξ + 2 ) + 2 t 2 ξ + 2 Γ ( 2 ξ + 3 ) ) + ( ( ξ + 1 ) t 3 ξ + 1 Γ ( 3 ξ + 2 ) t 3 ξ Γ ( 3 ξ + 1 ) ) ( a 1 cos 2 x + b 1 ( cos 3 x 2 sin 2 x cos x ) c 1 ( 2 cos 2 x cos x sin 2 x sin x ) ) + ( ( ξ + 1 ) t 3 ξ + 1 Γ ( 3 ξ + 2 ) t 3 ξ Γ ( 3 ξ + 1 ) )
( a 1 cos 2 x + ( b 1 2 c 1 ) ( cos 2 x cos x 2 sin 2 x sin x ) ) + Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) t 4 ξ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) 2 Γ ( 4 ξ + 1 ) [ ( a 1 cos x + b 1 cos 2 x 2 c 1 cos 2 x ) 2 + ( a 1 sin x + b 1 sin x cos x c 1 sin 2 x ) ( a 1 sin x 2 b 1 sin 2 x + 4 c 1 sin 2 x ) ] + c 1 μ α 2 cos 2 x ( t 2 ξ Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) 2 t 2 ξ + 1 Γ ( 2 ξ + 2 ) + 2 t 2 ξ + 2 Γ ( 2 ξ + 3 ) ) + ( ( ξ + 1 ) t 3 ξ + 1 Γ ( 3 ξ + 2 ) t 3 ξ Γ ( 3 ξ + 1 ) ) ( 2 a 1 cos 2 x + b 1 ( 2 cos 3 x 7 sin 2 x cos x ) c 1 ( 4 cos 2 x cos x 5 sin 2 x sin x ) ) + ( ( ξ + 1 ) t 3 ξ + 1 Γ ( 3 ξ + 2 ) t 3 ξ Γ ( 3 ξ + 1 ) ) ( 2 a 2 cos 2 x + b 2 ( 2 cos 3 x 7 sin 2 x cos x ) c 2 ( 4 cos 2 x cos x 5 sin 2 x sin x ) ) + Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) t 4 ξ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) 2 Γ ( 4 ξ + 1 ) [ 2 ( a 1 cos x + ( b 1 2 c 1 ) cos 2 x ) ( a 2 cos x + ( b 2 2 c 2 ) cos 2 x ) + ( a 1 sin x 2 ( b 1 2 c 1 ) sin 2 x ) ( a 2 sin x + b 2 sin x cos x c 2 sin 2 x ) + ( a 1 sin x + b 1 sin x cos x c 1 sin 2 x ) ( a 2 sin x 2 ( b 2 2 c 2 ) sin 2 x ) ] + a 1 t ξ sin x Γ ( ξ + 1 ) + t ξ + 1 sin x Γ ( ξ + 2 ) t 2 ξ Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) ( a 1 sin x + ( 4 c 1 2 b 1 ) sin 2 x ) + b 1 cos x sin x ( t ξ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) 2 t ξ + 1 Γ ( ξ + 2 ) + 2 p ξ + 2 Γ ( ξ + 3 ) ) + ( ( ξ + 1 ) t 2 ξ + 1 Γ ( 2 ξ + 2 ) t 2 ξ Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) ) ( a 1 sin x cos x + b 1 sin x cos 2 x c 1 sin 2 x cos x ) + ( ( ξ + 1 ) t 2 ξ + 1 Γ ( 2 ξ + 2 ) t 2 ξ Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) ) ( a 1 sin x cos x + ( b 1 2 c 1 ) ( cos 2 x sin x ) ) + Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) t 3 ξ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) 2 Γ ( 3 ξ + 1 ) [ ( a 1 cos x + b 1 cos 2 x 2 c 1 cos 2 x ) ( a 1 sin x + b 1 sin x cos x c 1 sin 2 x ) ] c 1 sin 2 x ( t ξ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) 2 t ξ + 1 Γ ( ξ + 2 ) + 2 p ξ + 2 Γ ( ξ + 3 ) ) ( a 1 sin 2 x + b 1 ( 2 sin x cos 2 x sin 3 x ) c 1 ( 2 cos 2 x sin x + sin 2 x cos x ) ) + ( ( ξ + 1 ) t 2 ξ + 1 Γ ( 2 ξ + 2 ) t 2 ξ Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) ) ( a 2 sin 2 x + b 2 ( 2 sin x cos 2 x sin 3 x ) c 2 ( 2 cos 2 x sin x + sin 2 x cos x ) ) + Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) t 3 ξ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) 2 Γ ( 3 ξ + 1 ) [ ( a 1 cos x + ( b 1 2 c 1 ) cos 2 x ) ( a 2 sin x + b 2 sin x cos x c 2 sin 2 x ) ( a 2 cos x + ( b 2 2 c 2 ) cos 2 x ) ( a 1 sin x + b 1 sin x cos x c 1 sin 2 x ) ]
v 1 ( x , t ) = α 2 t 2 ξ sin x Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) + t 2 ξ + 1 sin x Γ 2 ξ + 2 ( a 2 sin x + ( 4 c 2 2 b 2 ) sin 2 x ) t 3 ξ Γ ( 3 ξ + 1 ) a 2 μ α t 2 ξ cos x Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) + t 2 ξ + 1 cos x Γ 2 ξ + 2 ( a 2 cos x + ( 4 c 2 2 b 2 ) cos 2 x ) t 3 ξ Γ ( 3 ξ + 1 ) b 2 λ α cos 2 x ( t 2 ξ Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) 2 t 2 ξ + 1 Γ ( 2 ξ + 2 ) + 2 t 2 ξ + 2 Γ ( 2 ξ + 3 ) ) + ( ( ξ + 1 ) t 3 ξ + 1 Γ ( 3 ξ + 2 ) t 3 ξ Γ ( 3 ξ + 1 ) ) ( a 2 cos 2 x + b 2 ( cos 3 x 2 sin 2 x cos x ) c 2 ( 2 cos 2 x cos x sin 2 x sin x ) ) + ( ( ξ + 1 ) t 3 ξ + 1 Γ ( 3 ξ + 2 ) t 3 ξ Γ ( 3 ξ + 1 ) ) ( a 2 cos 2 x + ( b 2 2 c 2 ) ( cos 2 x cos x 2 sin 2 x sin x ) ) + Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) t 4 ξ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) 2 Γ ( 4 ξ + 1 ) [ ( a 2 cos x + b 2 cos 2 x 2 c 2 cos 2 x ) 2 + ( a 2 sin x + b 2 sin x cos x c 2 sin 2 x ) ( a 2 sin x 2 b 2 sin 2 x + 4 c 2 sin 2 x ) ] + c 2 μ α 2 cos 2 x ( t 2 ξ Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) 2 t 2 ξ + 1 Γ ( 2 ξ + 2 ) + 2 t 2 ξ + 2 Γ ( 2 ξ + 3 ) ) + ( ( ξ + 1 ) t 3 ξ + 1 Γ ( 3 ξ + 2 ) t 3 ξ Γ ( 3 ξ + 1 ) ) ( 2 a 1 cos 2 x + b 1 ( 2 cos 3 x 7 sin 2 x cos x ) c 1 ( 4 cos 2 x cos x 5 sin 2 x sin x ) ) + ( ( ξ + 1 ) t 3 ξ + 1 Γ ( 3 ξ + 2 ) t 3 ξ Γ ( 3 ξ + 1 ) ) ( 2 a 2 cos 2 x + b 2 ( 2 cos 3 x 7 sin 2 x cos x ) c 2 ( 4 cos 2 x cos x 5 sin 2 x sin x ) ) + Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) t 4 ξ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) 2 Γ ( 4 ξ + 1 ) [ 2 ( a 1 cos x + ( b 1 2 c 1 ) cos 2 x ) ( a 2 cos x + ( b 2 2 c 2 ) cos 2 x ) + ( a 1 sin x 2 ( b 1 2 c 1 ) sin 2 x ) ( a 2 sin x + b 2 sin x cos x c 2 sin 2 x ) + ( a 1 sin x + b 1 sin x cos x c 1 sin 2 x ) ( a 2 sin x 2 ( b 2 2 c 2 ) sin 2 x ) ] + a 2 t ξ sin x Γ ( ξ + 1 ) + t ξ + 1 sin x Γ ( ξ + 2 ) t 2 ξ Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) ( a 2 sin x + ( 4 c 2 2 b 2 ) sin 2 x ) + b 2 cos x sin x ( t ξ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) 2 t ξ + 1 Γ ( ξ + 2 ) + 2 t ξ + 2 Γ ( ξ + 3 ) ) + ( ( ξ + 1 ) t 2 ξ + 1 Γ ( 2 ξ + 2 ) t 2 ξ Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) ) ( a 2 sin x cos x + b 2 sin x cos 2 x c 2 sin 2 x cos x ) + ( ( ξ + 1 ) t 2 ξ + 1 Γ ( 2 ξ + 2 ) t 2 ξ Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) ) ( a 2 sin x cos x + ( b 2 2 c 2 ) ( cos 2 x sin x ) ) + Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) t 3 ξ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) 2 Γ ( 3 ξ + 1 ) [ ( a 2 cos x + b 2 cos 2 x 2 c 2 cos 2 x ) ( a 2 sin x + b 2 sin x cos x c 2 sin 2 x ) ]
c 2 sin 2 x ( t ξ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) 2 t ξ + 1 Γ ( ξ + 2 ) + 2 p ξ + 2 Γ ( ξ + 3 ) ) ( a 1 sin 2 x + b 1 ( 2 sin x cos 2 x sin 3 x ) c 1 ( 2 cos 2 x sin x + sin 2 x cos x ) ) + ( ( ξ + 1 ) t 2 ξ + 1 Γ ( 2 ξ + 2 ) t 2 ξ Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) ) ( a 2 sin 2 x + b 2 ( 2 sin x cos 2 x sin 3 x ) c 2 ( 2 cos 2 x sin x + sin 2 x cos x ) ) + Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) t 3 ξ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) 2 Γ ( 3 ξ + 1 ) [ ( a 1 cos x + ( b 1 2 c 1 ) cos 2 x ) ( a 2 sin x + b 2 sin x cos x c 2 sin 2 x ) ( a 2 cos x + ( b 2 2 c 2 ) cos 2 x ) ( a 1 sin x + b 1 sin x cos x c 1 sin 2 x ) ]
Thus, we can find the rest of the terms in a similar manner.
Hence, the approximate solution is given by u ( x , t ) = u 0 ( x , t ) + u 1 ( x , t ) + and v ( x , t ) = v 0 ( x , t ) + v 1 ( x , t ) + .
As we can see that the evaluation of the terms u 1 , v 1 , u 2 , v 2 , becomes cumbersome, we further simplify the fractional two-mode coupled burgers equations by taking α = 0 ,   a 1 = a 2 = 1 ,   b 1 = b 2 = 2 ,   c 1 = c 2 = 1
D t 2 ξ u = D t ξ ( u x x + 2 u u x ( u v ) x ) D t 2 ξ v = D t ξ ( v x x + 2 v v x ( u v ) x )
with initial conditions
u ( x , 0 ) = v ( x , 0 ) = sin x , u x ( x , 0 ) = v x ( x , 0 ) = cos x ,
u x x ( x , 0 ) = v x x ( x , 0 ) = sin x , u t ( x , 0 ) = v t ( x , 0 ) = sin x .
Applying LHPM, we have
h 0 : U 0 ( x , p ) = sin x p sin x p 2 sin x p ξ + 1 = sin x p sin x p 2 + sin x p ξ + 1 h 1 : U 1 ( x , p ) = 1 p ξ L u 0 x x + 2 u 0 u 0 x ( u 0 v 0 ) x = 1 p ξ L sin x + t sin x t ξ sin x Γ ( ξ + 1 ) = sin x p ξ + 1 + sin x p ξ + 2 sin x p 2 ξ + 1 h 2 : U 2 ( x , p ) = 1 p ξ L u 1 x x + 2 ( u 0 u 1 ) x ( u 0 v 1 + u 1 v 0 ) x = 1 p ξ L t ξ sin x Γ ( ξ + 1 ) t ξ + 1 sin x Γ ( ξ + 2 ) + t 2 ξ sin x Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) = sin x p 2 ξ + 1 cos x p 2 ξ + 2 + sin x p 3 ξ + 1
and so on. Now we apply inverse Laplace transform in each of the above equations to get the u 0 , u 1 , u 2 , as follows,
u 0 ( x , t ) = sin x t sin x + t ξ sin x Γ ( ξ + 1 ) u 1 ( x , t ) = L 1 sin x p ξ + 1 + sin x p ξ + 2 sin x p 2 ξ + 1 = t ξ sin x Γ ( ξ + 1 ) + t ξ + 1 sin x Γ ( ξ + 2 ) t 2 ξ sin x Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) u 2 ( x , t ) = L 1 sin x p 2 ξ + 1 sin x p 2 ξ + 2 + sin x p 3 ξ + 1 = t 2 ξ sin x Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) t 2 ξ + 1 sin x Γ ( 2 ξ + 2 ) + t 3 ξ sin x Γ ( 3 ξ + 1 )
and so on. Thus, the approximate solution is given by
u 0 ( x , t ) + u 1 ( x , t ) + u 2 ( x , t ) + = sin x t sin x + t ξ sin x Γ ( ξ + 1 ) t ξ sin x Γ ( ξ + 1 ) + t ξ + 1 sin x Γ ( ξ + 2 ) t 2 ξ sin x Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) + t 2 ξ sin x Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) t 2 ξ + 1 sin x Γ ( 2 ξ + 2 ) + t 3 ξ sin x Γ ( 3 ξ + 1 ) +
Following the similar arguments give us
v 0 ( x , t ) + v 1 ( x , t ) + v 2 ( x , t ) + = sin x t sin x + t ξ sin x Γ ( ξ + 1 ) t ξ sin x Γ ( ξ + 1 ) + t ξ + 1 sin x Γ ( ξ + 2 ) t 2 ξ sin x Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) + t 2 ξ sin x Γ ( 2 ξ + 1 ) t 2 ξ + 1 sin x Γ ( 2 ξ + 2 ) + t 3 ξ sin x Γ ( 3 ξ + 1 ) +
We note that the approximate solutions u ( x , t ) and v ( x , t ) both tend to sin x e t as ξ 1 which is the exact solution of the standard coupled burgers equation.
The graphical representation of an approximate solutions for different values of ξ are given in Figure 1. Furthermore, the comparison of Figure 1 and Figure 2 shows that the approximate solutions calculated by LHPM is very close to the exact solution as ξ is very close to 1 because both graphs are similar.

7. Conclusions

In this paper, we have solved time-fractional two-mode coupled Burgers equations using Laplace homotopy perturbation method. An illustrative example has been solved with initial conditions. It has been shown by a well-known example that the given method is very efficient and reliable.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.G.; Formal analysis, R.S., P.G. and A.A.; Investigation, R.S., P.G. and J.-H.H.; Methodology, J.-H.H. and A.A.; Software, R.S.; Supervision, J.-H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

There is no data used in the paper.

Acknowledgments

Authors are thankful to reviewers for improvement in the paper. This work was supported by Taif University Researcher Supporting Project number (TURSP- 2020/326), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present paper.

References

  1. Bateman, H. Some recent researches on the motion of fluids. Mon. Weather Rev. 1915, 43, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Burgers, J.M. A Mathematical Model Illustrating the Theory of Turbulence. In Advances in Applied Mechanics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1948; Volume 1, pp. 171–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Momani, S. Non-perturbative analytical solutions of the space-and time-fractional Burgers equations. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2006, 28, 930–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rawashdeh, M.S. A reliable method for the space-time fractional Burgers and time-fractional Cahn-Allen equations via the FRDTM. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2017, 2017, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Saad, K.M.; Al-Sharif, E.H.F. Analytical study for time and time-space fractional Burgers’ equation. Adv. Differ. Equa. 2017, 2017, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Sugimoto, N. Burgers equation with a fractional derivative, hereditary effects on nonlinear acoustic waves. J. Fluid Mech. 1991, 225, 631–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Korsunsky, S.V. Soliton solutions for a second-order KdV equation. Phys. Lett. 1994, 185, 174–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wazwaz, A.M. A two-mode Burgers equation of weak shock waves in a fluid: Multiple kink solutions and other exact solutions. Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math. 2016, 3, 3977–3985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jaradat, H.M. Two-mode coupled Burgers equation:Multiple-kink solutions and other exact solutions. Alex. Eng. J. 2017, 57, 2151–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sulaiman, T.A.; Yavuz, M.; Bulut, H.; Baskonus, H.M. Investigation of the fractional coupled viscous Burgers’ equation involving Mittag-Leffler kernel. Phys. Stat. Mech. Appl. 2019, 527, 121126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Esipov, S.E. Coupled Burgers equations: A model of polydispersive sedimentation. Phys. Rev. 1995, 52, 3711–3718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Alkahtani, B.S.T.; Alkahtani, J.O.; Dubey, R.S.; Goswami, P. The solution of modified fractional Bergman’s minimal blood glucose-insulin model. Entropy 2017, 19, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Chaurasia, V.B.L.; Dubey, R.S. Analytical solution for the differential equation containing generalized fractional derivative operators and Mittag-Leffler-type function. Int. Sch. Res. Not. Isrn Appl. Math. 2011, 2011, 682381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Dubey, R.S.; Goswami, P. Analytical Solution of the Nonlinear Diffusion Equation. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2018, 133, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shrahili, M.; Dubey, R.S.; Shafay, A. Inclusion of Fading Memory to Banister Model of Changes In Physical Condition Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. 2020, 13, 881–888. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, Y.; An, H.-L. Numerical solutions of coupled Burgers equations with time- and space-fractional derivatives. Appl. Math. Comput. 2008, 200, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Elbeleze, A.A.; Kilicman, A.; Taib, B.M. Note on the Convergence Analysis of Homotopy Perturbation Method for Fractional Partial Differential Equations. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2014, 2014, 803902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hammouch, Z.; Yavuz, M.; Özdemir, N. Numerical solutions and synchronization of a variable-order fractional chaotic system. Math. Model. Numer. Simul. Appl. (MMNSA) 2021, 1, 11–23. [Google Scholar]
  19. JHe, H. Homotopy perturbation technique. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 1999, 178, 257–262. [Google Scholar]
  20. Rashid, S.; Khalid, A.; Sultana, S.; Hammouch, Z.; Shah, R.; Alsharif, A.M. A novel analytical view of time-fractional Korteweg-De Vries equations via a new integral transform. Symmetry 2021, 13, 1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sripacharasakullert, P.; Sawangtong, W.; Sawangtong, P. An Approximate Analytical Solution of the Fractional Multi-Dimensional Burgers Equation by the Homotopy Perturbation Method. Adv. Differ. Equations 2019, 2019, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jafari, H. Numerical Solution of Time-Fractional Klein–Gordon Equation by Using the Decomposition Methods. Asme-J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 2016, 11, 041015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Miller, K.S.; Ross, B. An Introdution to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations; J. Willey & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  24. Podlubny, I. Fractional Differential Equations; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kilbas, A.A.; Srivastava, H.M.; Trujillo, J.J. Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations; Elsevier North-Holland Science Publishers: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2006; Volume 204. [Google Scholar]
  26. He, J.H. Perturbation Methods: Basic and Beyond; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  27. He, J.H. Application of Homotopy Perturbation Method to Nonlinear Wave Equations. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2005, 26, 695–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. He, J.H.; El-Dib, Y.O. The enhanced homotopy perturbation method for axial vibration of strings. Facta Univ. Mech. Eng. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Approximate solutions for ξ = 0.5 and ξ = 0.9 .
Figure 1. Approximate solutions for ξ = 0.5 and ξ = 0.9 .
Fractalfract 05 00196 g001
Figure 2. Exact solution.
Figure 2. Exact solution.
Fractalfract 05 00196 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shokhanda, R.; Goswami, P.; He, J.-H.; Althobaiti, A. An Approximate Solution of the Time-Fractional Two-Mode Coupled Burgers Equation. Fractal Fract. 2021, 5, 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5040196

AMA Style

Shokhanda R, Goswami P, He J-H, Althobaiti A. An Approximate Solution of the Time-Fractional Two-Mode Coupled Burgers Equation. Fractal and Fractional. 2021; 5(4):196. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5040196

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shokhanda, Rachana, Pranay Goswami, Ji-Huan He, and Ali Althobaiti. 2021. "An Approximate Solution of the Time-Fractional Two-Mode Coupled Burgers Equation" Fractal and Fractional 5, no. 4: 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5040196

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop