Next Article in Journal
Fractional Order Derivative Models of Porosity on Physical Fractal Spaces
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrodynamic Fluctuations and Damped Oscillating Friction Lead to Active Motion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Discrete Heuristic Model of Vacuum Memory with Fractal-like Structure: Entropy, Fourier Signatures, Bohmian Guidance and Decoherence in a Two-Slit Interferometer

1
National Institute of Research and Development for Technical Physics, IFT Iași, 700050 Iasi, Romania
2
Clinical Emergency Hospital “Prof. Dr. Nicolae Oblu” Iași, 700309 Iasi, Romania
3
Department of Environmental Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Agritourism, Faculty of Engineering, “Vasile Alecsandri” University of Bacau, 600115 Bacau, Romania
4
Faculty of Material Science and Engineering, “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University, 700050 Iasi, Romania
5
Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, “Vasile Alecsandri” University of Bacau, 600115 Bacau, Romania
6
Academy of Romanian Scientists, 3 Ilfov, 050044 Bucharest, Romania
7
Department of Biophysics and Medical Physics-Nuclear Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, 700115 Iasi, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fractal Fract. 2026, 10(2), 117; https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract10020117
Submission received: 12 January 2026 / Revised: 3 February 2026 / Accepted: 4 February 2026 / Published: 9 February 2026

Abstract

We present a conceptual and computational investigation of vacuum memory within a discrete toy-model framework. In this phenomenological approach, we introduce an effective memory field that records virtual events and nonlocal couplings on a lattice, without claiming to derive a fundamental new field of nature. Using a discrete toy model, we simulate memory formation via virtual events, nonlocal links, and black-hole-like information sinks. The resulting dynamics exhibit long-range spatial correlations, curvature-induced accumulation, high-entropy retention zones, and distinct spectral features, indicating that the modeled memory field can store and organize information in a vacuum-like medium. Building on this foundation, we incorporate curvature-modulated vacuum memory fields into Bohmian particle dynamics. By varying the memory coupling strength λ, we demonstrate that memory gradients systematically bend particle trajectories toward curvature centers, illustrating an active role for structured memory in guiding quantum-like motion. We further show that when vacuum memory encodes the full quantum phase S(x, t) and particles are guided by the Bohmian relation x ˙ = m 1 x S , the trajectories collapse onto a single path with machine-level precision, providing a numerical consistency check that our implementation reproduces exact pilot-wave guidance and minimal-action dynamics. Through a minimal two-site entangled-memory model, we demonstrate that coupled memory fields—without explicit particle dynamics—can spontaneously synchronize via weak informational coupling, generating robust nonlocal correlations reminiscent of entanglement. Finally, we simulate two-slit interference under vacuum memory perturbations. While random, unstructured memory preserves quantum coherence and fringe visibility, structured, phase-sensitive memory induces dephasing and suppresses interference, functioning as a phenomenological decoherence mechanism. Together, these results situate our toy model within emerging information-based views of quantum dynamics and spacetime, offering a computational platform and conceptual lens for exploring the informational dynamics of a vacuum-like medium.

1. Introduction

1.1. Theoretical Motivation

The concept of vacuum memory, as introduced in this work, refers to the hypothesis that the quantum vacuum may retain persistent, spatially distributed traces of virtual events. We model this memory as a scalar field that evolves over time by recording and integrating local fluctuations. In this framework, memory denotes the cumulative influence of prior local and nonlocal events on a given region of the vacuum, represented by scalar quantities that evolve deterministically through decay, propagation, and accumulation mechanisms.
In the present work, the memory field M(x,t) is introduced as a purely phenomenological construct. It is not derived from quantum field theory, general relativity, or any established effective field theory. Instead, M(x,t) should be understood as a numerical surrogate used to organize and probe simplified information-retention dynamics in a vacuum-like medium. Throughout the paper, we therefore use the term “vacuum memory” in this restricted toy-model sense, rather than as a claim of a new fundamental degree of freedom in nature.
The term information is used in its thermodynamic and statistical sense, signifying the emergence of structure, correlation, and entropy in the vacuum field that differentiates it from pure noise. This is not a metaphysical proposition but an operational hypothesis: memory is considered measurable through observables such as spatial correlations, entropy distributions, and frequency-domain coherence in the simulated vacuum, modulated by space-time curvature and entanglement structure. Memory is therefore not metaphorical, but modeled as a dynamic, localized field that records interactions and energy exchanges, drawing on analogies from thermodynamics and quantum information theory.
This hypothesis is motivated by a growing body of research in quantum gravity that suggests a deep connection between information, entanglement, and space-time geometry. Foundational ideas underlying our approach include the ER = EPR conjecture, which proposes that quantum entanglement and Einstein–Rosen bridges (wormholes) may be fundamentally equivalent [1], implying that correlation and connectivity are geometrically encoded. Similarly, the holographic principle, formalized through the AdS/CFT correspondence [2], posits that all information in a volume can be encoded on its boundary, again tying geometry to information in a profound way.
Investigations into black hole entropy [3,4] and quantum information recovery [5,6] further support the notion that event horizons act as informational reservoirs, capable of retaining and eventually releasing quantum data. At the same time, causal set theory proposes that space-time itself may emerge from a discrete structure of causal, informational events [7], closely paralleling the discrete lattice-based memory model employed in our simulations. Our model aligns with the causal set approach [8,9] in treating spacetime as a network of discrete events. However, it introduces a new dimension: localized memory accumulation and decay, which allows each site not only to record causal connections but also to evolve dynamically based on informational history—opening a path toward memory-induced curvature or coherence.
Recent developments have gone even further, suggesting that space-time geometry may arise from patterns of quantum entanglement [10] and that gravitational dynamics could emerge as effective entropic forces [11]. Together, these theoretical perspectives suggest that memory, structure, and geometry may be closely intertwined in fundamental physics. Our toy-model framework is intended as a qualitative exploration of how such co-emergent behavior could be mimicked by simple informational dynamics.

1.2. Conceptual Framework and Model

Unlike standard quantum field theory (QFT), which treats the vacuum as a fluctuating ground state governed by operator dynamics, we model an effective vacuum-like medium as a dynamical informational substrate, evolving via a phenomenological memory field that is sensitive to space-time curvature and prior virtual events. This view overlaps with causal set theory, black hole information frameworks, and holographic models, where geometric loci such as horizons or network nodes encode the history of interaction.
To study the dynamical implications of this memory, we incorporate principles from Bohmian mechanics (pilot-wave theory) [12,13]. In this deterministic framework, particles follow trajectories guided by a global phase field S(x,t), governed by the velocity relation x ˙ = m 1 x S . By allowing the vacuum memory to encode either intensity (scalar memory) or phase (Bohmian field), we investigate how structure in the memory field can direct quantum particle trajectories, enforce synchronization, and generate collective guidance—especially in the presence of curvature.
This chapter presents a toy model framework designed to test whether memory-like behavior can emerge from minimal assumptions: stochastic local dynamics, nonlocal correlations, curvature modulation, and pilot-wave guidance. Although speculative, our approach provides a computational platform for exploring the possible interplay between quantum memory, space-time structure, and informational geometry.
A central focus of this work is whether vacuum memory fields—depending on their structure—preserve or degrade quantum coherence, particularly in iconic setups such as the two-slit interference experiment. By varying memory properties and their coupling to quantum phase, we investigate whether decoherence-like behavior can emerge from internal vacuum dynamics, without invoking external observers.
In short, this study explores, at the level of a discrete toy model, whether a vacuum-like informational substrate could function as an active information-retaining medium shaped by curvature, entanglement analogs, and feedback from prior events. Motivated by foundational principles such as ER = EPR, the holographic principle, and the statistical mechanics of spacetime, our model tests whether quantum fluctuations—typically assumed ephemeral—might leave structured, dynamical traces in the vacuum itself, particularly in regions of strong gravitational curvature.

2. Methods

An overview of the simulation architecture and timestep logic is provided in Figure 1.

2.1. Intensity-Based Vacuum Memory Toy Model

We emphasize that this is a phenomenological toy model: the scalar memory field is introduced as a numerical device to explore information-retention dynamics and is not intended as a fundamental field of nature.
We constructed a discrete, time-evolving simulation on a 100 × 100 spatial grid to explore how structured memory could emerge within a simplified quantum vacuum setting. Each cell in the grid stores a scalar memory value, initially zero, and is updated at each time step according to the following rules:
  • Local event generation: With a fixed probability, virtual events spontaneously occur at each grid point, incrementing the local memory value.
  • Local propagation: With a given probability, memory spreads to neighboring cells, mimicking short-range diffusion or interaction.
  • Nonlocal linkage: A fraction of events replicate their memory content to randomly selected distant sites, simulating nonlocal entanglement effects in the spirit of the ER = EPR conjecture.
  • Exponential decay: Memory values decay over time unless protected by geometric factors such as local curvature or containment within specific regions.
Spacetime curvature is modeled via a fixed Gaussian gravitational potential centered on the grid. This curvature modulates both event probabilities and decay rates, enhancing local activity while preserving memory against dissipation. To simulate permanent retention, we introduce three “black-hole-like” circular sink zones in which memory does not decay.
Simulation Parameters (Table 1)
Analysis Methods:
The resulting memory field was analyzed using:
  • Two-point spatial correlations to assess coherence over distance.
  • Local Shannon entropy (computed over sliding 3 × 3 windows) to quantify informational heterogeneity.
  • 2D Fourier transforms to reveal dominant spatial frequency components.
Simulations were implemented in Python 3.12.12 using NumPy 2.0.2, SciPy 1.16.3, and Matplotlib 3.10.0. Mathematical expressions for decay, curvature modulation, and entropy analysis are detailed in Appendix A.
Although the simulated memory field exhibits heterogeneous structure over multiple spatial scales and nontrivial long-range correlations, we do not perform a rigorous multifractal analysis in terms of generalized dimensions Dq or singularity spectra f(α). The diagnostics used here—two-point correlation functions, local Shannon entropy, and 2D Fourier spectra—characterize the field as a stochastic, heterogeneous memory landscape with emergent large-scale structure, but they are not sufficient to establish multifractality in the strict sense. For this reason, we avoid the term ‘multifractal’ and instead describe the field as having fractal-like or multi-scale structure within our toy-model framework.
Parameter Choice and Model Sensitivity.
The numerical parameter values used in this study were selected to ensure numerical stability, computational efficiency, and the emergence of visually and statistically interpretable structures within a finite simulation time. They are not derived from first principles and should not be regarded as physically calibrated quantities.
The local event probability (0.02) was chosen to ensure sparse but persistent excitation of the memory field, avoiding both trivial inactivity and rapid saturation. The decay factor (0.99) allows memory to persist long enough for spatial organization to develop, while still preventing unbounded growth outside retention zones. The non-local link probability (0.1) represents a weak but non-negligible coupling between distant sites, sufficient to generate long-range correlations without dominating local dynamics.
No systematic parameter sweep was performed in the present work. However, qualitative inspection during exploratory testing indicates that the observed behaviors—curvature-enhanced accumulation, entropy differentiation, and the emergence of non-local correlations—are not restricted to a single fine-tuned parameter choice. In particular, stronger decay tends to suppress long-term memory formation, while weaker decay leads to saturation rather than structured organization.
A comprehensive sensitivity analysis mapping the full parameter space is left for future work and will be necessary to determine the precise boundaries between stable, saturated, and structure-forming regimes.
The spatial geometry of the simulation domain, including the curvature well, memory-retaining sink regions, and particle initialization zones, is illustrated schematically in Figure 2.

2.2. Phase-Memory Pilot-Wave Simulation

To test whether vacuum memory encoding the full quantum phase S(x,t) can reproduce Bohmian guidance dynamics, we conducted a one-dimensional simulation of a Gaussian wavepacket. We extracted the phase from the complex wavefunction and used it to guide an ensemble of test particles.
The memory field was defined as:
M x , t = S x , t = ·   A r g ψ x , t
and test particles followed the guidance law:
X ˙ i t = 1 m x S X i t , t
Implementation Details:
  • Domain: x ∈ [−L/2, L/2], L = 100, N = 1024
  • Grid spacing: Δx = L/N
  • Time step: Δt = 0.005, total duration: T = 1.0
  • Initial wavepacket: Center x0 = −20, width σ = 2, momentum k0 = 5
  • Particle ensemble: 10 initial positions spaced in [−20.2, −19.8]
Computation:
  • Time evolution via split-step FFT method.
  • Phase S(x, t) extracted from wavefunction.
  • Gradient ∂xS computed using central differences.
  • Particle positions updated using linear interpolation and Euler integration.
This model confirmed that phase-aware vacuum memory reproduces the expected Bohmian dynamics: all test particles converge onto a single trajectory. This outcome follows directly from the definition of Bohmian mechanics and is therefore not intended as a new physical mechanism. Rather, it serves as a numerical consistency check that our implementation of phase extraction, gradient computation, and particle advection correctly reproduces standard Bohmian guidance. Full mathematical details are presented in Appendix B. We note that the forward Euler scheme used to advect the test particles is not the most accurate choice for long-time Bohmian dynamics in general, where higher-order or symplectic integrators are preferable to minimize cumulative drift. In this specific one-dimensional Gaussian wavepacket test, however, the evolution time is short and the potential is smooth, so Euler integration is sufficient for our limited purpose here of verifying numerical consistency with the standard Bohmian guidance law.

2.3. Curvature-Tailored Pilot-Wave Trajectories with Vacuum Memory

To examine how structured vacuum memory might influence ensemble dynamics, we simulated particle motion in a two-dimensional space under the influence of a curvature-modulated vacuum memory gradient.
Particles were guided by a force proportional to the gradient of a Gaussian curvature field:
v m e m x , y = λ R x , y
where
R x , y = e x p x 2 + y 2 2 σ 2
with coupling strength λ and curvature width σ.
We emphasize that in this experiment the particle guidance depends on the gradient of the smooth, deterministic curvature field R(x,y), not on the stochastic vacuum memory field itself; therefore, no spatial smoothing or filtering of a noisy memory gradient is required.
Implementation Details:
  • Domain: (x, y) ∈ [−50, 50] × [−50, 50]
  • Number of particles: 30
  • Initial positions: Randomized along x ≈ 0, y ∈ [−30, 30]
  • Time step: Δt = 0.1, for 200 steps
  • Parameters: σ = 10, λ ∈ {0, 10, 50, 100}
Particles experienced a constant forward drift in x, plus curvature-based modulation via vacuum memory. Trajectories were computed via Euler integration. Bending toward the curvature center increased with λ, as discussed further in Appendix C. Because the aim of this experiment is to quantify the qualitative dependence of trajectory bending on the memory–curvature coupling λ over a modest number of time steps, a first-order Euler update is adequate to resolve the trend. For more demanding applications—such as long-time evolution in complex curvature landscapes—higher-order schemes (e.g., Runge–Kutta) or symplectic integrators would be required to further control numerical drift in the particle trajectories.

2.4. Nonlocal Memory Synchronization in a Two-Site Doublet

To investigate nonlocal entanglement-like effects in vacuum memory, we implemented a two-site model comprising scalar memory fields MA(t) and MB(t), coupled through symmetric stochastic dynamics:
d M A d t = γ M A + β M B M A + σ ξ A t d M B d t = γ M B + β M A M B + σ ξ B t
where:
  • γ is the intrinsic decay rate
  • β is the coupling strength
  • σ is the noise amplitude
  • ξA,B(t) are uncorrelated Gaussian noise processes
Simulation Setup:
  • Integration: Forward Euler
  • Time domain: t ∈ [0, 10], Δt = 0.01
  • Initial conditions: MA(0), MB(0) ∈ [−0.1, 0.1]
  • Parameters: γ = 0.5, β = 1.0, σ = 0.2
Analysis:
  • Time evolution of MA(t), MB(t)
  • Running Pearson correlation ρ(MA,MB) computed over a 100-step sliding window
Results showed the two memory sites synchronize over time despite noise, confirming nonlocal coherence via informational feedback. See Appendix D.

2.5. Vacuum Memory in Two-Slit Interference Simulations

To explore whether vacuum memory fields affect quantum coherence, we implemented a two-dimensional double-slit simulation using split-step Fourier evolution. Two variants of vacuum memory interaction were studied.

2.5.1. Random Vacuum Memory Model

A stochastic vacuum memory field M(x,y,t) was introduced, updated as:
M x , y , t + t = M x , y , t + λ · η ( x , y , t )
where η is Gaussian white noise. The wavefunction was perturbed at each step via:
ψ ( x , y , t ) ψ ( x , y , t ) · e x p ( i M x , y , t )
Simulations were performed for λ = 0, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0. The resulting interference patterns were analyzed via fringe visibility:
V = I m a x I m i n I m a x + I m i n
on a virtual detection screen.

2.5.2. Phase-Sensitive Memory Feedback

In the second variant, the vacuum memory field responded directly to the quantum phase:
M x , y , t + t = ( 1 γ t ) M x , y , t + λ · ϕ ( x , y , t )
This models a cumulative memory of quantum phase history. We tested values λ = 0, 5, 10, with simulations run on a 256 × 256 grid spanning Lx = Ly = 200. A Gaussian wavepacket (width σ = 5) was initialized above a two-slit barrier (slit width 6, center separation 20, located at y = −20). Propagation used alternating potential and kinetic steps in Fourier space over 360 iterations.
These simulations provide a framework for exploring how various forms of vacuum memory—random or phase-sensitive—can influence interference phenomena. To ground these models mathematically, we supplement the numerical scheme with a formal treatment in Appendix E, where we define the Schrödinger evolution under both stochastic potential perturbations (random memory) and non-unitary dephasing dynamics (phase-sensitive memory). Appendix E includes the differential equations governing memory evolution, its coupling to the quantum state, and the extraction of fringe visibility as a quantitative metric. Together, these provide a theoretical and numerical basis for interpreting the vacuum memory’s potential to either preserve or suppress quantum coherence in the two-slit setup. In particular, the phase-sensitive memory update introduces an explicit, history-dependent dephasing of the wavefunction. This choice is best regarded as a phenomenological decoherence model rather than a derivation of decoherence from first principles of vacuum dynamics.

3. Results

This section presents our simulation results in two stages. First, we explore how informational structure spontaneously emerges in vacuum memory fields, with a focus on spatial correlations, curvature accumulation, entropy patterns, and spectral coherence. Then, we shift to analyzing how these memory structures can influence particle dynamics and coherence phenomena—demonstrating their ability to guide motion, generate entanglement, or suppress interference. Each result is followed by a robustness analysis to ensure that observed behavior is not an artifact of numerical setup.
For a formal description of the model equations see Appendix A.

3.1. Local and Non-Local Correlations

To probe the spatial memory structure of the simulated vacuum, we conducted a two-point correlation analysis. This method computes the average product of memory values across pairs of points at various distances. The resulting plot demonstrates a strong peak at short distances, indicating significant local memory clustering due to virtual particle events and neighborhood propagation.
Interestingly, the correlation curve maintains a relatively stable average across mid-range and large distances, suggesting the presence of persistent, distance-independent correlations. These are attributed to the non-local event mechanisms inspired by the ER = EPR conjecture, which link distant regions of the memory grid.
Fluctuations observed in the correlation plot at greater distances arise from the stochastic nature of the simulation. We note that while the data exhibits statistical noise, the persistent non-zero correlations across the full spatial domain support the hypothesis of distributed, non-local vacuum memory.
To ensure reproducibility of this result for reviewers, a fixed random seed (np.random.seed(42)) was used. However, the underlying phenomenon is robust and persists across multiple randomized runs, in line with the inherently probabilistic character of quantum fluctuations. Our two-point correlation analysis confirmed strong local and subtle yet persistent non-local correlations (see Figure 3).

3.2. Space-Time Curvature Effects

To simulate the influence of gravity on vacuum memory, we introduced a Gaussian-shaped gravitational potential at the center of the grid, simulating space-time curvature. In this region, both the rate of memory event generation and memory persistence were increased. This mimics the idea that curvature not only distorts geometry but also enhances quantum activity and information retention.
The resulting heatmap shows a clear intensification of memory values near the gravitational center, fading smoothly outward. This visual outcome supports the idea that curvature acts as an amplifier or attractor of vacuum memory. The dynamic memory field demonstrates how geometric conditions of space-time could modulate information structure within the vacuum(see Figure 4).

3.3. Black-Hole-like Sinks

To further extend our model, we implemented fixed regions within the simulation grid that act as stable memory retention zones. These regions, referred to here as black-hole-like sinks, are defined by a non-decaying boundary condition, such that the local memory decay factor is set to α = 1 inside the sink regions (Figure 5).
Each sink is implemented as a circular mask that disables memory decay while still allowing accumulation from local and non-local events. As a result, memory values within these regions grow over time and exhibit increasing variance. This behavior is a direct and expected mathematical consequence of the imposed non-decaying boundary condition: under continuous stochastic injection, sites with α = 1 necessarily display unbounded variance and increasing heterogeneity, as shown analytically in Appendix A.10.
The elevated memory accumulation and entropy observed inside these sinks therefore follow by construction from the model assumptions rather than representing an emergent dynamical prediction. The analogy to black holes as information-retaining objects is intended only at a qualitative and heuristic level, serving as an intuitive visualization of permanent information retention rather than as a derivation of black hole thermodynamics or horizon physics.

3.4. Entropy Analysis of the Vacuum Memory Field

To investigate the informational structure of the vacuum memory field, we computed the Shannon entropy locally across the grid. Using a reduced-size sliding window, we calculated the entropy of each neighborhood based on the distribution of memory values.
Within each sliding window, memory values were normalized to a local probability distribution before computing Shannon entropy, ensuring that elevated entropy reflects genuine heterogeneity in memory structure rather than simple amplitude or dynamic-range scaling.
Contrary to our initial intuition, the analysis revealed that the average entropy inside the black-hole-like sinks was slightly higher than in the surrounding regions (2.30 vs. 2.08). This is not a contradiction, but a meaningful result: the sinks accumulate all local and non-local memory inputs and retain them permanently, leading to a richer, more diverse internal distribution—hence, higher entropy. This aligns with the theoretical expectation that black holes are maximal entropy objects.
This finding not only reinforces our hypothesis that vacuum memory is structured, but also reveals a deeper thermodynamic parallel. It is important to emphasize, however, that the unbounded growth of memory inside these retention zones is a straightforward consequence of the imposed boundary condition α(x, y) = 1: with constant injection and no decay, the expected memory increases linearly in time (as shown in Appendix A.10). Thus, the divergent memory in these ‘black-hole-like’ regions is not a nontrivial emergent prediction of the model but rather an explicit design feature of the update rule. The nontrivial aspect of the behavior lies instead in the elevated local entropy and diversity of memory within the sinks, which provides a qualitative analogy to black holes as high-entropy information reservoirs (Figure 6).

3.5. Control Simulation: Pure Noise Comparison

To demonstrate that the observed structure in our simulations does not arise by chance, we ran a control simulation under the same parameters but without non-local correlations or gravitational curvature. In this version, memory evolved solely from uniformly random local events with standard decay.
The resulting memory and entropy maps show no large-scale structure, with high entropy across the grid and no persistent accumulation zones. This comparison confirms that the features observed in our primary model emerge specifically from curvature and non-locality—not from stochastic noise (see Figure 7).

3.6. Fourier Analysis of Memory Structure

To complement the spatial and statistical analyses, we conducted a spectral analysis of the vacuum memory field using a two-dimensional Fast Fourier Transform (2D FFT). This approach reveals how spatial structure and coherence manifest in the frequency domain. Because the simulations are performed on a finite square lattice, grid-induced anisotropy and aliasing effects—particularly at high spatial frequencies—are expected and must be explicitly distinguished from physically meaningful structure.
The Fourier spectrum of the structured memory field (Figure 8a) displays distinct intensity peaks and nontrivial low-frequency spectral structure, indicating non-random, large-scale organization. The dominant features are concentrated at low spatial frequencies and exhibit approximately radial organization, suggesting that memory structure emerges at multiple spatial scales due to the interplay of curvature and non-local correlations. In contrast, the narrow anisotropic bands aligned with the Cartesian grid axes at higher spatial frequencies are consistent with standard discretization and FFT aliasing effects on a square lattice and are therefore not interpreted as physical vacuum structures.
In contrast, the Fourier spectrum of the control simulation (Figure 8b) is flat and isotropic, characteristic of spatial white noise. This provides supporting evidence that the organized low-frequency spectral features observed in the structured memory field arise specifically from the introduced geometric and non-local couplings, rather than from stochastic noise alone.
To test whether the dominant low-frequency spectral features are artifacts of the 100 × 100 discretization, we repeated the full intensity-based vacuum memory simulation on a higher-resolution 256 × 256 grid using identical parameters. The resulting real-space fields and Fourier spectra are presented and analyzed in Appendix F. While the axis-aligned high-frequency bands persist as expected numerical artifacts, the low-frequency isotropic spectral enhancement remains robust and becomes sharper under grid refinement, indicating that the principal features reported here are not solely grid artifacts.

3.7. Statistical Robustness of Observed Patterns

To visualize these findings, Figure 9 presents the results from 10 independent simulation runs. Figure 9a displays the average entropy measured inside versus outside the memory-retaining zones, clearly showing the consistent disparity between the two regions. Figure 9b plots the mid-range spatial correlation for each run, confirming the persistence of long-distance correlations under randomized conditions.
To assess the reproducibility and significance of the observed memory structures, we repeated the simulation ten times using different random seeds. Across these runs, the spatial correlation at long distances remained non-zero with a mean value of 0.16 ± 0.03. The average local entropy within memory-retaining zones was 2.28 ± 0.04, compared to 2.07 ± 0.05 in surrounding regions. Similarly, the average power spectrum of the structured field consistently exhibited prominent low-frequency peaks with a variance of less than 5% in spectral amplitude across runs. These results indicate that the emergence of structure is not a simulation artifact but a statistically stable phenomenon.

3.8. Phase-Memory Guided Pilot-Wave Interaction: Numerical Consistency Check

While our previous analyses focused on scalar memory accumulation—reflecting intensity, entropy, and long-range spatial correlations—an equally fundamental aspect of quantum systems is the role of phase information. In Bohmian mechanics, particle trajectories are guided by the gradient of a global phase field S(x,t) extracted from the underlying quantum wavefunction. Motivated by this, we extend our vacuum memory framework to consider whether memory structures that retain not only local event intensities but also quantum phase information could naturally generate minimal-action paths. Specifically, we test whether storing S(x,t) in the vacuum field and guiding particles according to Bohmian dynamics leads to emergent order, synchronization, and exact trajectory collapse.
To demonstrate how an enriched vacuum memory can reproduce pilot-wave dy-namics, we performed a 1D simulation in which the memory field from Equation (1) stores the full quantum phase of the wavefunction. Ten test particles, initially localized near the wave packet, were then evolved according to the guidance law from Equation (2) (see Equations (1) and (2)) using linear interpolation on a uniform grid. As shown in Figure 10, all trajectories collapse onto the same path with machine-precision agreement, confirming that, as expected from the Bohmian guidance law, a memory field storing the full wavefunction phase reproduces exact Bohmian trajectories. This experiment there-fore functions primarily as a numerical consistency check of our implementation.

3.9. Curvature-Modulated Pilot-Wave Trajectories via Vacuum Memory

To test whether structured vacuum memory could actively guide particle trajectories, we simulated a two-dimensional Bohmian ensemble coupled to a curvature-modulated memory gradient.
Particles were initialized along a narrow region offset from the center of a Gaussian gravitational potential. In the absence of vacuum memory influence (λ = 0), particles propagated along straight trajectories, drifting uniformly across the grid.
However, when a memory coupling was introduced, such that particle velocities were biased by the gradient of the curvature field according to Equations (3) and (4), particles began to bend toward the curvature center.
By sweeping the vacuum memory strength λ from 0 to 100, we observed a clear, quantitative increase in the average lateral displacement Δx of the particle ensemble. The greater the memory influence, the more particles curved toward regions of higher curvature.
Figure 11a shows sample trajectories for several values of λ, overlaid on the curvature field. For λ = 0, trajectories remain straight, while for λ = 100, they curve significantly inward.
Figure 11b quantifies the mean bending Δx versus λ, showing a near-monotonic increase in convergence with memory strength.
These results confirm that vacuum memory fields structured by space-time curvature can serve as active agents of guidance, influencing the global organization of particle motion in a controllable and predictable manner.

3.10. Nonlocal Memory Synchronization in a Coupled Doublet

While the previous sections examined how vacuum memory can guide individual particle dynamics through local gradients or phase structures, another essential aspect of quantum systems is nonlocal correlation. Motivated by entanglement phenomena and ER = EPR conjectures, we now explore whether minimal nonlocal memory coupling between distant regions can spontaneously generate robust synchronization. To this end, we design a two-site classically coupled memory model, focusing purely on memory field dynamics without involving explicit particle trajectories.
We investigated whether simple nonlocal coupling between two vacuum memory sites could induce spontaneous correlation over time, despite local stochastic fluctuations. Two memory fields, MA(t) and MB(t), were initialized with opposite signs and evolved under symmetric decay, random noise, and mutual memory coupling.
Figure 12 summarizes the results. Initially, the two memory values behave independently, reflecting uncorrelated random fluctuations. However, as time progresses, the influence of nonlocal vacuum memory coupling dominates over noise, and the two fields begin to exhibit increasingly strong correlation.
The left panel of Figure 12 shows the memory trajectories at sites A and B. Despite stochastic noise, the two trajectories gradually align in magnitude and phase. The right panel plots the running Pearson correlation coefficient ρ(MA,MB), computed over a sliding window. The correlation initially fluctuates near zero but rises steadily, reaching values close to −0.84 by the end of the simulation.
This behavior confirms that vacuum memory, even when limited to local fields with weak classical coupling, can act as an effective nonlocal synchronization mechanism within the model. The resulting correlations are mediated by the explicit coupling term β(MBMA), and therefore constitute classical information coupling rather than quantum entanglement. Nevertheless, the example illustrates how large-scale nonlocal coherence can arise from simple dynamical rules in an informational substrate.
Together, the intensity-based vacuum memory simulations, the phase-memory-guided particle dynamics, the curvature-modulated trajectories, and the classically coupled memory doublet experiments reveal complementary facets of how structure, coherence, and nonlocal organization can emerge from minimal informational assumptions about vacuum behavior. In the following discussion, we synthesize these findings in the broader context of quantum gravity, entanglement, and the evolving informational view of spacetime.

3.11. Effects of Vacuum Memory on Two-Slit Interference

We investigated how different forms of vacuum memory influence quantum coherence in a canonical two-slit interference setup. Two types of vacuum memory couplings were considered: (i) random, unstructured phase memory, and (ii) structured, phase-sensitive memory that accumulates the wavefunction’s phase history.

3.11.1. Random Vacuum Memory Perturbation

In the first test, we coupled the quantum phase to a fluctuating random vacuum memory field M(x,y,t), as detailed in Methods 2.5.1. Across a range of memory strengths (λ = 0, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0), the interference fringes remained clearly visible. Quantitative analysis showed that the fringe visibility decreased only slightly with increasing λ, remaining above 0.91 in all cases. Figure 13 illustrates this robustness, showing fringe visibility measurements with error bars across different memory strengths. The interference pattern remains stable and coherent despite moderate phase perturbations, indicating that unstructured noise does not significantly degrade quantum coherence.

3.11.2. Phase-Sensitive Vacuum Memory Coupling

In the second test, the vacuum memory field was designed to store and feed back the phase of the quantum wavefunction over time (see Section 2.5.2). Unlike the previous case, this structured, phase-sensitive memory had a profound effect on the interference pattern. As λ increased from 0 to 10, the interference fringes progressively degraded and ultimately vanished.
Figure 14a displays the resulting intensity maps for three values of λ. With no memory (λ = 0), clear interference fringes are visible. At intermediate coupling (λ = 5), the pattern is blurred. For strong memory (λ = 10), the interference collapses entirely into a single lobe, demonstrating wavefunction decoherence. Figure 14b quantifies this transition: fringe visibility decreases steadily with increasing λ, confirming that coherent superpositions are suppressed by phase-aware memory.
For clarity, Table 2 summarizes the fringe visibility values reported in Section 3.11.1 and Section 3.11.2 and Appendix G for the different vacuum memory scenarios.
Interpretation
These results underscore a critical distinction. Random vacuum memory fields—representing unstructured, noise-like perturbations—are insufficient to suppress quantum interference. In contrast, organized, phase-sensitive memory fields act effectively as internal decohering environments. Within our toy-model framework, this suggests that only memory structures capable of storing and feeding back coherent quantum information—and thereby explicitly dephasing the wavefunction—can suppress interference, in close analogy to environmental decoherence.
A useful control experiment, left for future work, would involve a “scrambled-phase” memory in which the memory field feeds back phase information from unrelated spatial locations; such a test would distinguish structured memory-induced decoherence from generic correlated noise introduced by the update rule itself.

3.12. Robustness Analyses: Summary of Control Tests

To verify that the core effects reported in Section 3.8, Section 3.9, Section 3.10 and Section 3.11 arise from genuine structural features of the simulations—rather than from numerical artifacts, drift, or accidental coherence—we conducted an extensive series of control experiments and statistical robustness tests.
These tests examined:
(i)
Phase-guided particle dynamics under structured versus random phase memory,
(ii)
Curvature-modulated trajectories compared with random curvature fields,
(iii)
Synchronization behavior in the two-site memory-entangled model across repeated stochastic realizations, and
(iv)
Statistical stress tests of fringe visibility in the two-slit experiment under random and phase-sensitive memory coupling.
Across all cases, the observed behaviors—trajectory collapse, curvature-driven convergence, memory synchronization, and selective suppression of interference—were found to be reproducible and strongly dependent on the presence of structured memory fields. Randomized controls consistently destroyed these effects.
Full quantitative results, including detailed metrics, repeated-run statistics, and supporting figures, are provided in Appendix G.

4. Discussion

4.1. Memory Fields and Geometric Structure

Before turning to the broader implications, we emphasize that the terms “vacuum”, “black holes”, “entanglement”, and “ER = EPR” are used here in a heuristic sense. They serve as qualitative analogies to familiar concepts in quantum gravity and quantum information, not as literal identifications. The underlying dynamics remain those of our phenomenological toy model.
Our findings offer a compelling case that, within our toy-model framework, a vacuum-like medium can encode and retain information through structured fluctuations and geometry-induced memory effects. Each enhancement to the toy model—non-local entanglement, curvature, and horizon-like sinks—produces increasingly ordered and persistent memory patterns.
The analogies to black hole physics are heuristic but physically suggestive within the limits of the toy model. We emphasize, however, that the unbounded growth of memory inside these sinks follows directly from the imposed no-decay boundary condition (α = 1), as shown analytically in Appendix A.10, and is therefore a built-in feature of the model rather than a non-trivial dynamical prediction. Furthermore, the persistence of long-range correlations reinforces the idea that explicit nonlocal informational couplings can generate spatially extended coherence within the model, in qualitative analogy with entanglement-based ideas such as ER = EPR.
The fact that structured memory only arises when both curvature and non-local connections are present further suggests that geometry and quantum entanglement are complementary aspects of vacuum memory architecture. Our model thus resonates with emerging views in quantum gravity that unify space-time and information through deep entropic and topological principles.
The entropy results highlight a subtle but essential point: regions of high information storage are not necessarily low-entropy. Rather, they contain rich, heterogeneous memory retained from a wide range of events. In this way, our black-hole-like sinks behave analogously to black holes as high-entropy information reservoirs, though the model does not reproduce the Bekenstein–Hawking area-law scaling and should not be interpreted as a microscopic description of black-hole thermodynamics.
The Fourier analysis extends this insight into the frequency domain. The structured simulation reveals distinct spectral peaks and directional coherence, confirming the presence of large-scale memory patterns. In contrast, the control simulation’s spectrum lacks such features, validating the claim that non-locality and curvature are essential for organized memory formation.
Together, the spatial, entropic, and spectral analyses provide a multifaceted picture of how vacuum memory may emerge, stabilize, and encode structure through fundamental quantum-gravitational dynamics.
A conceptual parallel can be drawn to emergent gravity approaches, particularly Jacobson’s thermodynamic derivation of Einstein’s equations [14]. In Jacobson’s framework, spacetime curvature arises from local thermodynamic relations across causal horizons, linking geometry to underlying microscopic degrees of freedom. Similarly, our vacuum memory model suggests that informational accumulation and gradients could act as effective forces shaping dynamics, hinting that curvature and structure may emerge from fundamental informational processes. While our approach remains purely heuristic and discrete, the shared philosophy—that spacetime organization could be secondary to informational dynamics—reinforces the broader plausibility of vacuum memory ideas.
The correlations observed here arise from explicit coupling terms and synchronous updates and therefore represent classical nonlocal synchronization rather than Bell-type quantum entanglement.

4.2. Phase Memory and Exact Pilot-Wave Dynamics

Furthermore, we have shown that when the vacuum memory field is explicitly identified with the full quantum phase of an evolving wavepacket and particles are guided according to the standard Bohmian law, all trajectories coalesce onto a single path with machine-precision agreement. This phase-memory experiment is therefore best interpreted as a numerical consistency check: it confirms that our discrete implementation of phase extraction, gradient computation, and particle advection faithfully reproduces the known Bohmian minimal-action trajectories when supplied with the exact phase field S(x,t), rather than providing a new physical mechanism for how the vacuum might dynamically acquire this phase information.

4.3. Informational Forces and Curvature-Driven Dynamics

Beyond static structure, we also demonstrated that structured vacuum memory fields can actively modulate particle dynamics. By coupling Bohmian trajectories to a curvature-induced memory gradient, we showed that particles are not only passively influenced but can be dynamically guided toward regions of higher curvature accumulation. The observed monotonic increase in trajectory bending with memory strength λ supports the view that vacuum memory may serve as an informational landscape capable of directing quantum systems. This behavior evokes analogies with gravitational focusing or entropic forces, where geometry and information content jointly shape dynamical evolution.
A speculative, order-of-magnitude mapping between the dimensionless parameters of the toy model and possible physical scales is provided in Appendix H. These estimates are intended solely as heuristic illustrations and should not be interpreted as experimentally predictive.

4.4. Quantum Coherence and Decoherence via Vacuum Memory

Our next simulation explored the dynamical effect of vacuum memory on quantum interference, using a double-slit configuration. Remarkably, we found that a weak, random vacuum memory field (with no phase sensitivity) preserves the interference fringes with only minor distortion, suggesting that generic fluctuations in memory do not inherently disrupt quantum coherence. However, when the memory field is endowed with phase sensitivity—i.e., it records and responds to the local quantum phase—the interference pattern collapses. Increasing the memory coupling strength λ leads to a progressive suppression of fringe contrast, with full collapse at large λ. This effect mimics decoherence: the vacuum memory acts as an informational environment that entangles with and disrupts phase relations in the wavefunction. Importantly, this occurs in a closed, deterministic model, without external observers or measurement, suggesting that informational backaction from vacuum memory could emulate quantum measurement collapse. This raises the intriguing possibility that wavefunction decoherence or localization may emerge intrinsically from structured, phase-aware vacuum memory rather than from external noise or measurement.
These findings resonate with the broader decoherence framework developed by Zurek [15] and expanded in open quantum system treatments [16], where system-environment entanglement leads to the suppression of interference. In contrast, our model suggests that the vacuum itself—if structured via internal memory—can act as a decohering agent, even in the absence of an external environment.

4.5. Emergent Nonlocal Correlation and Entanglement Analogs

Beyond guiding individual particles via memory gradients, vacuum memory may also give rise to nonlocal correlations between spatially separated regions. To explore this, we examine a simplified two-site memory model in which symmetric coupling between memory fields at sites A and B leads to spontaneous emergence of large-scale entanglement-like behavior—even in the absence of explicit particle trajectories.
Despite being independently driven by stochastic fluctuations, the coupled memory fields naturally evolve toward a highly correlated state. The observed increase in Pearson correlation over time, even under random noise, demonstrates that minimal nonlocal coupling is sufficient to synchronize distant regions of memory.
Because this synchronization arises from a global simulation update rule and a shared time parameter, it should not be interpreted as relativistic quantum entanglement, nor as permitting superluminal signaling or violating Lorentz covariance. Instead, the two-site model should be viewed as a classical synchronization mechanism mediated by explicit coupling terms, providing at most an analogy to how nonlocal correlations might arise in a more realistic informational field.
This behavior closely parallels key features of quantum entanglement, where subsystems retain statistical coherence without classical communication. In our model, the memory interaction serves a similar function: establishing long-range coherence through purely informational links.
These results suggest that large-scale memory coherence in the vacuum can emerge dynamically, without the need for fine-tuned initial conditions. They reinforce the broader theme that structure, information retention, and long-range order may be self-organizing consequences of simple dynamical principles operating within the vacuum.

4.6. Connections to Quantum Gravity and Informational Models

Our toy model also fits within a broader research landscape exploring the emergence of spacetime and structure from informational or entanglement-based mechanisms. In contrast to tensor network models of holography [17] and holographic quantum error-correcting codes [18], which emphasize static ground-state entanglement patterns, our vacuum memory framework highlights a time-evolving, dynamical process of memory accumulation and correlation formation. Similarly, while analog gravity experiments such as Bose–Einstein condensate horizons [19] simulate effective curved geometries, our approach emphasizes informational fields rather than emergent metric tensors. These differences underscore that informational ordering in the vacuum may manifest through multiple complementary mechanisms—static entanglement structure, dynamical memory processes, or analog emergent metrics—each offering distinct insights into the nature of spacetime and quantum information.

4.7. Experimental Outlook and Theoretical Limitations

Unlike the earlier experiments based on Bohmian pilot-wave dynamics—where particle trajectories were explicitly guided by vacuum memory fields—the two-site memory-entangled model focuses purely on the intrinsic evolution of memory itself. No explicit quantum phase or particle motion is involved; instead, nonlocal correlation emerges from the internal coupling of memory dynamics within the vacuum.
Although our work is based on computational toy models, the concept of vacuum memory may eventually lend itself to indirect experimental probing. For example, structured vacuum memory fields could manifest as subtle deviations in particle trajectories, energy distributions, or quantum noise correlations. Potential experimental platforms include precision interferometry near massive bodies, low-energy scattering in curved-space environments, and analog gravity systems such as Bose–Einstein condensates or optical metamaterials. These could simulate memory gradients or curvature analogs under controlled conditions.
As a speculative analogy, structured memory fields might be mimicked using engineered condensed-matter systems. In particular, Bose–Einstein condensates with tailored spatial potentials could simulate informational gradients, allowing embedded impurities to behave similarly to Bohmian test particles. Their drift trajectories, modulated by memory-like fields, could provide indirect evidence of informational steering, serving as proof-of-principle tests for the dynamical effects predicted by vacuum memory models. This approach draws inspiration from analog gravity research, where condensed matter systems such as Bose–Einstein condensates simulate effective space-time curvature [20]. Our proposal extends this idea by encoding memory effects into these analog substrates, potentially offering an avenue to explore informational feedback within emergent spacetime geometries.
Despite these intriguing prospects, our approach remains highly idealized. The models rely on discrete lattices, non-relativistic dynamics, and simplified assumptions. Future work must extend the framework to continuous quantum fields, incorporate relativistic corrections, and explore coupling to dynamically evolving spacetime geometries.
It is important to emphasize that the vacuum memory field proposed here is speculative and heuristic. It is not derived from any established formalism in quantum field theory, general relativity, or AdS/CFT correspondence. Rather, the model serves to illustrate how minimal ingredients—local fluctuations, non-local couplings, and curvature modulation—may give rise to structure, memory retention, and emergent dynamics, resonating with broader themes in quantum gravity research.
Recent developments in quantum gravity increasingly suggest that spacetime itself may emerge from entanglement patterns and underlying informational correlations [21,22]. Our model reflects this conceptual shift, treating the vacuum not as an inert backdrop, but as a potentially active, information-processing medium.
Taken together, these findings suggest that structured vacuum memory offers a compelling new perspective for exploring quantum information flow, emergent geometry, and the deep connections between space, time, and information.

4.8. Experimental Proposals for Testing Vacuum Memory Dynamics

Although the models presented in this work are theoretical, several aspects of their phenomenology may, in principle, be explored through indirect experimental analogs or precision quantum platforms. A set of speculative experimental proposals is outlined in Appendix I, including phase-coherence tests in two-slit interferometry near engineered substrates, particle deflection in curvature analogs such as Bose–Einstein condensates, potential deviations in Casimir forces near structured substrates, and the emergence of nonlocal correlations in memory-entangled systems. These proposals are intended as qualitative illustrations of how the model’s behavior might inspire future experimental investigations, rather than as concrete or predictive experimental designs.

4.9. Limitations and Open Questions

While the proposed vacuum memory framework provides a computational platform for exploring informational dynamics in curved spacetime, several foundational limitations and unresolved questions remain. Addressing these is essential for extending the model toward a fully physical theory compatible with established frameworks in quantum field theory (QFT) and general relativity.
Relativistic Extensions
The current implementation is inherently non-relativistic, relying on a global time coordinate and synchronous memory updates. A relativistic generalization would require formulating the memory field M(xμ) as a covariant scalar field on a Lorentzian manifold, with dynamics respecting local causality and light-cone structure. Similar efforts exist in relativistic extensions of Bohmian mechanics [23] and in covariant formulations of stochastic fields in curved spacetime [24], which may provide guidance. Embedding vacuum memory in such a framework would allow for consistency with general covariance and causal structure, potentially linking to semiclassical gravity and quantum field theory in curved backgrounds [25].
Continuum Limit and Field-Theoretic Generalization
Our simulations employ a discrete lattice, motivated by causal set theory [7], but a continuous analogue would enhance analytic tractability and theoretical integration. A natural extension involves modeling M(x,t) as a scalar field obeying a curvature-modulated diffusion or reaction-diffusion equation, e.g.:
t M x , t = D 𝛻 2 M x , t + γ R x α M x , t + η x , t
where R(x) represents Ricci curvature and η encodes stochastic fluctuations. Formalizing this within an effective Lagrangian or Hamiltonian framework, possibly analogous to non-equilibrium field theories, would enable application of functional methods and perturbative analysis. Connections to hydrodynamic or emergent gravity models [14] might offer further structure.
Integration with Quantum Field Theory
The memory field is introduced heuristically and remains external to the operator algebra and Lagrangian structure of conventional QFT. A critical open problem is whether memory dynamics can emerge from, or be consistently coupled to, existing quantum fields. One speculative avenue is treating M(x,t) as an effective, coarse-grained degree of freedom arising from entanglement entropy gradients or reduced density matrix dynamics [17]. Alternatively, the memory field might be understood as part of an open-system extension of QFT, drawing on non-unitary evolution and decoherence theory [15,16]. Any such integration must address renormalization behavior, gauge invariance, and preservation (or controlled violation) of unitarity.

5. Conclusions

This study introduces and substantiates a speculative but operationally grounded toy-model concept in which a vacuum-like medium functions as an information-retaining substrate, dynamically influenced by space-time curvature, nonlocal couplings, and localized memory effects. Through a sequence of computational simulations, we demonstrated that random local fluctuations alone are insufficient to create structure, but when combined with curvature, non-local correlations, and phase-sensitive memory, the vacuum develops persistent, self-organizing informational patterns.
While the framework is inherently idealized and toy-model based, the mechanisms it probes—informational accumulation, entanglement-induced correlations, and curvature-modulated dynamics—echo deeper theoretical motifs emerging in quantum gravity. These include the holographic principle, the ER = EPR conjecture, and thermodynamic interpretations of spacetime. Together, our simulations offer a conceptual sandbox for exploring how vacuum structure could emerge from minimal assumptions about information flow.
Our entropy analysis confirmed that black-hole-like memory sinks in the model act as regions of enhanced informational diversity and retention. While this behavior is qualitatively reminiscent of theoretical black holes as high-entropy reservoirs, it arises here from an imposed no-decay boundary condition and does not constitute a derivation of Bekenstein–Hawking area-law scaling. Fourier analysis further validated the presence of coherent memory structures, with sharp spectral features absent from noise-dominated controls—highlighting the essential role of nonlocal coupling and curvature in organizing memory.
Crucially, by extending the vacuum memory field to store the full quantum phase of a wavefunction, we showed that particles governed by Bohmian dynamics converge with machine-level numerical agreement, confirming the internal consistency of the phase-memory Bohmian implementation. This result underscores that phase-retentive memory is sufficient to generate exact minimal-action motion, without external potentials.
Furthermore, we demonstrated that vacuum memory fields, when modulated by curvature gradients, can dynamically influence the paths of quantum particles. As the memory coupling strength λ increases, particles exhibit progressively stronger convergence toward regions of higher curvature—effectively simulating information-based lensing or focusing.
We also explored nonlocal informational synchronization using a minimal two-site memory model. Despite stochastic noise, weakly coupled memory registers consistently developed a strong correlation over time. This behavior supports the hypothesis that entanglement-like coherence in the vacuum may arise from simple coupling dynamics, without requiring classical communication or fine-tuning.
To test the impact of vacuum memory on quantum coherence, we simulated the canonical two-slit interference experiment under two types of vacuum memory perturbations. Random, unstructured memory fields preserved the interference pattern, confirming that quantum coherence is robust to incoherent vacuum fluctuations. In contrast, structured, phase-sensitive memory fields induced progressive fringe suppression—mimicking decoherence despite the absence of measurement or environmental noise. This suggests that informational feedback within the vacuum could act as an intrinsic mechanism for wavefunction collapse or decoherence.
Altogether, these findings support the broader view that, at least at the level of our phenomenological model, a vacuum-like medium may not be a featureless stage, but an informationally active environment—capable of storing, organizing, and transmitting structure through curvature, correlation, and phase dynamics.
Key features such as black-hole-like sinks and memory entanglement are phenomenological inputs implemented algorithmically, rather than emergent consequences of a fundamental Lagrangian or first-principles field theory.
Among the various components of the toy model, the phase-sensitive memory-induced suppression of two-slit interference stands out as the most physically robust and conventional result, closely paralleling standard decoherence mechanisms in open quantum systems.
Future directions include:
  • Searching for anisotropic low-frequency signatures in Fourier spectra analogous to those identified in the structured vacuum memory simulations,
  • Testing for systematic fringe-visibility suppression curves in interferometric setups consistent with phase-sensitive vacuum memory feedback,
  • Extending the model to higher-dimensional and continuous field-theoretic formulations to assess the robustness of these predicted signatures,
  • Exploring whether analogous informational feedback effects can be engineered in analog gravity platforms such as Bose–Einstein condensates.
  • Constructing a genuinely dynamical memory field that spontaneously converges toward S(x,t) without being imposed by hand remains an open direction for future work.
In sum, this work lays the conceptual groundwork for a memory-based view of the vacuum, potentially bridging quantum information, spacetime emergence, and non-equilibrium field theory.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.G.B. and M.A.; methodology, M.A. and M.P.-L.; software, O.R. and I.-C.G.; validation, V.N. and L.D.; formal analysis, F.N. and M.P.-L.; investigation, D.C.M. and O.R.; resources, V.N. and D.C.M.; data curation, F.N. and M.P.-L.; writing—original draft preparation, C.G.B.; writing—review and editing, M.A. and I.-C.G.; visualization, V.N. and L.D.; supervision, M.A. and V.G.; project administration, V.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

All the data is presented in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A. Mathematical Formalization of the Vacuum Memory Simulation with Curvature and Retention Zones

This appendix provides a formal mathematical framework supporting the vacuum memory simulation presented in the main text (Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6). The model captures the interaction between space-time curvature, memory decay and accumulation, event generation, diffusion, and localized information retention in high-curvature or protected zones.

Appendix A.1. Memory Field Definition

We define a discrete scalar memory field:
M : Z 2 × N R
where M(x,y,t) is the memory value at grid location (x,y) at discrete time t. The grid Z 2 represents space and evolves in time t N .

Appendix A.2. Space-Time Curvature Field

Curvature is modeled via a normalized Gaussian scalar field centered at location (x0,y0):
R x , y = e x p x x 0 2 + y y 0 2 2 σ 2
This curvature modulates both the rate of memory decay and the likelihood of memory injection from virtual events.

Appendix A.3. Curvature-Dependent Virtual Event Injection

Each site may spontaneously receive a memory “injection” representing a virtual quantum event. The likelihood of such an event is increased by local curvature. We define:
p e v e n t x , y = p 0 1 + β R x , y
where:
  • p0 ∈ (0, 1) is the base event probability,
  • β ≥ 0 modulates curvature sensitivity,
  • R(x,y) ∈ [0, 1] is the curvature field.
Then the event variable is:
η x , y , t = 1 , w i t h   p r o b a b i l i t y   p e v e n t x , y 0 , o t h e r w i s e
This implies that regions of high curvature have more frequent injections, consistent with gravitational amplification of vacuum fluctuations. This effect contributes to the memory concentration observed in Figure 4.

Appendix A.4. Memory Decay Modulated by Curvature

The decay rate α(x,y) ∈ (0, 1] is defined as:
α x , y = α 0 + 1 α 0 R x , y
with α0 being the base decay coefficient. Curvature slows decay by pushing α(x,y)→1, where R(x,y) is high. This effect, combined with increased injection, yields the elevated memory profile at the center.

Appendix A.5. Memory Diffusion from Neighborhood

Let N(x,y) be the 8-cell Moore neighborhood of site (x,y). Memory diffuses as:
D i f f x , y , t = δ 8 ( i , j ) ϵ N ( x , y ) M ( i , j , t )
where δ ∈ [0, 1] controls the strength of local memory spread.

Appendix A.6. Memory Retention Zones (Black-Hole Analogs)

We define a subset B Z 2 to be the retention zone (or memory sink), such that:
α x , y = 1 for   all       x , y   ϵ B
Memory in these zones does not decay. This models black-hole-like regions that permanently retain incoming information.

Appendix A.7. Memory Update Rule

The full update equation is:
M x , y , t + 1 = M x , y , t + η x , y , t + D i f f x , y , t , i f   x , y   ϵ B α x , y M x , y , t + η x , y , t + D i f f x , y , t , o t h e r w i s e
This equation captures the accumulation of memory from virtual events and neighbor diffusion, along with either curvature-modulated decay or permanent retention.

Appendix A.8. Local Entropy Measurement

To quantify informational structure, we compute the local Shannon entropy around each point. Let P(x,y) be a fixed-size patch centered on (x,y), and let pk be the probability of histogram bin k in the patch. Then:
S x , y = k p k l o g p k
This entropy map identifies regions with high memory diversity, corresponding to areas of sustained or complex memory accumulation (see Figure 6).

Appendix A.9. Interpretation

This formalization provides a direct mathematical explanation for the simulations in Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6:
  • Figure 4: High curvature R(x,y) enhances both η(x,y,t) and α(x,y), leading to central memory buildup.
  • Figure 5: Retention zones B prevent decay, forming bright, persistent memory sinks.
  • Figure 6: The entropy field S(x,y) is elevated in both curved and retention regions due to the accumulation of varied memory input.
This deterministic field model provides a clean theoretical counterpart to the numerical results, linking geometry, stochastic processes, and information structure.

Appendix A.10. Steady-State Analysis and a Theorem

We now derive the long-time behavior of the expected memory value at any site.
Lemma A1. 
(Memory Saturation Outside Retention Zones).
For any site x∉ B with decay factor 0 < α(x) < 1, the expected memory after t steps is
E M ( x , t ) = k = 0 t 1 α x k p e v e n t x = p e v e n t x 1 α x t 1 α ( x )
As t→∞, since ∣α(x)∣ < 1,
lim t E M ( x , t ) = p e v e n t x 1 α ( x )
a finite steady-state.
Proof. 
At each step, memory decays by α(x) and receives an expected injection pevent(x). Writing E[M(x,t)] = α(x) E[M(x,t−1)] + pevent(x) and unrolling from M(x,0) = 0 yields the geometric sum. □
Lemma A2. 
(Linear Growth in Retention Zones).
For any site x∈B α(x) = 1, the expected memory grows linearly:
E M ( x , t ) = k = 0 t 1 p e v e n t x = t   p e v e n t x
Proof. 
With no decay, each step contributes pevent(x); summing over t steps gives linear growth. □
Theorem A1. 
(Steady-State Memory Profile).
Combining Lemmas A1 and A2:
E M ( x , ) = p e v e n t x 1 α ( x ) , x B , x B
Proof. 
Immediate from Lemma A1 (finite limit outside B) and Lemma A2 (unbounded inside). □
Numerical convergence tests confirm that, for the parameter values used in the simulations, memory values outside retention zones reach more than 95% of their theoretical steady-state levels by t ≈ 300, validating the use of a finite simulation duration T = 500 in the results presented.

Appendix B. Phase-Memory Pilot-Wave Formalism

To support the results of Section 3.8, we introduce a formal treatment of the phase-memory model. Writing the 1D wavefunction as
ψ x , t = R x , t e i S x , t
We define the vacuum memory field
M x , t = S ( x , t )
i.e., the full quantum phase. Test particles at position Xi(t) follow the guidance equation
X ˙ i t = 1 m x M X i t , t = 1 m x S X i t , t
which coincides exactly with the Bohmian velocity
v B o h m = 1 m S ( x , t )
Under this first-order law, any ensemble of initial positions within the support of ψ collapses onto the unique solution of the Euler–Lagrange equation for the quantum Hamilton–Jacobi function S(x, t), reproducing minimal-action trajectories to machine precision.
In our 1D simulation (Figure 10), we discretize x on a uniform grid with spacing Δx, compute S j n =   A r g ψ j n at each grid point (xj, tn), and approximate the gradient by
x S ( x j , t n ) S j + 1 n S j 1 n 2 x
Particles are advanced by
X i n + 1 = X i n + t m ( x S ) ( X i n , t n )
with linear interpolation of ∂xS between grid points. This scheme yields machine-precision agreement between the computed trajectories and the theoretical minimal-action solution, as seen in Figure 10.
The use of a first-order Euler integration scheme is adequate here because the phase field is smooth and the integration times are short; for more complex potentials or long-time evolution, higher-order methods such as fourth-order Runge–Kutta (RK4) or symplectic integrators would be required to control cumulative numerical drift.

Appendix C. Memory-Induced Velocity in Curvature-Modulated Pilot-Wave Model

In the curvature-guided vacuum memory experiment, particle motion is influenced by a velocity field derived from the spatial structure of vacuum memory.
We model the curvature field R(x,y) as a normalized Gaussian centered at the origin:
R x , y = e x p x 2 + y 2 2 σ 2
where σ sets the width of the curvature well.
The vacuum memory-induced velocity field is postulated to be proportional to the gradient of R(x,y):
v m e m x , y = λ R x , y
where λ ≥ 0 controls the memory coupling strength.
The spatial gradient of R(x,y) is computed as:
R x , y = R x , R y
with explicit components:
R x = x σ 2 e x p x 2 + y 2 2 σ 2 R y = y σ 2 e x p x 2 + y 2 2 σ 2
Thus, the final memory-induced velocity components are:
v m e m , x x , y = λ x σ 2 e x p x 2 + y 2 2 σ 2 v m e m , y x , y = λ y σ 2 e x p x 2 + y 2 2 σ 2
Particles initialized away from the center experience a net force driving them toward the region of highest curvature, and the strength of this effect scales linearly with λ.
Numerical integration of the resulting trajectories demonstrates that as λ increases, particles bend more sharply toward the origin, validating the memory-structured guidance hypothesis.

Appendix D. Analytical Model for Memory-Entangled Doublet

Appendix D.1. Memory Evolution Equations

We consider two memory fields, MA(t) and MB(t), associated with two spatially separated sites in the vacuum. Their evolution is governed by coupled stochastic differential equations:
d M A d t = γ M A + β M B M A + σ ξ A t d M B d t = γ M B + β M A M B + σ ξ B t
where:
  • γ ≥ 0 is the intrinsic decay rate,
  • β ≥ 0 is the nonlocal memory coupling strength,
  • σ ≥ 0 is the noise amplitude,
  • ξA(t), ξB(t) are independent normalized white noise sources satisfying:
ξ i t ξ j t = δ i j δ ( t t )
The coupling terms β(MB − MA) and β(MA − MB) ensure mutual influence: memory can flow bidirectionally between sites.

Appendix D.2. Effective System Behavior

Without noise (σ = 0), the deterministic dynamics can be written compactly:
d d t M A M B = γ + β β β γ + β M A M B
The eigenvalues of the coupling matrix are:
λ ± = γ + β ± β
Thus:
  • One mode (λ+ = −γ) decays slowly (due to intrinsic memory decay),
  • The other mode (λ− = −(γ + 2β)) decays faster due to strong coupling.
This implies that over time, the memory fields align along the slow-decaying eigenmode, reflecting memory synchronization.

Appendix D.3. Stochastic Behavior

In the presence of noise, fluctuations continually perturb the system.
However, as long as β is sufficiently large compared to σ, the coupling term dominates and drives the two memories toward correlated evolution.
The running Pearson correlation coefficient ρ(MA,MB) is expected to converge toward ±1 depending on initial conditions and coupling symmetry.

Appendix D.4. Physical Interpretation

In this model, vacuum memory entanglement acts as an informational bridge between distant regions.
Even under independent local noise, the two memory fields eventually synchronize due to shared informational history encoded in the vacuum.
This minimal two-site memory doublet thus serves as a proof of concept that nonlocal memory interactions can dynamically generate coherence in otherwise stochastic environments.

Appendix E. Modeling Memory-Induced Decoherence in the Two-Slit Experiment

We consider the time evolution of a quantum wavefunction ψ(x, y, t) governed by the two-dimensional Schrödinger equation with an external potential V(x,y):
i   ψ t = 2 2 m 𝛻 2 + V x , y ψ ( x , y , t )
To introduce vacuum memory effects, we augment the system with a scalar memory field M(x, y, t) defined over the same domain.
Two coupling models are investigated:

Appendix E.1. Memory-Coupled Potential (Weak Random Memory)

In the intensity memory case, the memory field M(x,y,t) evolves independently via stochastic dynamics, e.g.,
M t = γ M + σ η ( x , y , t )
where γ > 0 is a decay rate, σ is a noise amplitude, and η(x, y, t) is spatial white noise (uncorrelated in x, y, t).
The effective quantum dynamics is modified by a fluctuating potential:
V e f f x , y , t = V x , y + λ m e m M ( x , y , t )
where λmem is a small coupling constant.
Thus, the Schrödinger evolution becomes:
i   ψ t = 2 2 m 𝛻 2 + V e f f x , y , t ψ ( x , y , t )
Interpretation:
M(x, y, t) acts as a stochastic perturbation to the potential, possibly inducing random phase shifts in the wavefunction.

Appendix E.2. Memory-Driven Dephasing (Phase-Sensitive Collapse)

In the phase memory collapse scenario, we model decoherence by introducing an effective non-unitary term in the evolution:
d ρ d t = i H , ρ Γ x , y ( ρ Π d i a g ρ )
where:
  • ρ(x, y, x′, y′, t) = ψ(x, y, t)ψ∗(x′, y′, t) is the density matrix,
  • Γ(x, y) = λmem∣M(x,y,t)∣ is a memory-induced dephasing rate,
  • Πdiag(ρ) projects ρ onto its diagonal part (kills spatial coherences).
In the wavefunction approximation, this dephasing results in a gradual suppression of off-diagonal components in ρ, effectively reducing interference fringes.

Appendix E.3. Numerical Implementation

For simulations, we discretize x, y over a 256 × 256 grid with physical extent Lx = Ly = 200.
The two-slit barrier is introduced as a sharp potential wall with two narrow openings.
The time evolution proceeds by:
  • Split-step method: alternating application of kinetic (Fourier domain) and potential (position domain) propagators.
  • Updating M(x,y,t) via random noise at each step.
  • Modifying the potential V(x,y,t) accordingly.
  • Optionally applying direct amplitude decay factors to simulate dephasing.
The key control parameters are:
  • λmem (coupling strength),
  • σ (noise amplitude),
  • memory update schemes (uncorrelated vs. structured).
Fringe visibility V is extracted by measuring:
V = I m a x I m i n I m a x + I m i n
at a cross-section parallel to the slits at fixed final y.

Appendix F. Grid Resolution and Fourier-Space Robustness Analysis

Appendix F.1. Motivation

Because the vacuum memory simulations are performed on a finite square lattice, it is important to assess whether the spectral features observed in the Fourier analysis (Section 3.6) could arise from grid-induced anisotropy or aliasing effects rather than from genuine structure in the memory field. In particular, square lattices are known to introduce directional artifacts aligned with the Cartesian axes, especially at higher spatial frequencies, which may contaminate FFT-based diagnostics if not carefully checked.
To address this concern, we performed a direct grid-resolution robustness test, repeating the full intensity-based vacuum memory simulation using identical parameters on two different lattice resolutions: the original 100 × 100 grid used throughout the main text and a higher-resolution 256 × 256 grid.

Appendix F.2. Numerical Setup

The simulations in this appendix use the same update rules and parameters as described in Section 2.1 and Appendix A, including:
  • Base event probability p0 = 0.02
  • Diffusion strength δ = 0.3
  • Nonlocal link probability pnl = 0.1
  • Base decay factor α0 = 0.99
  • Gaussian curvature field R x , y = exp x 2 + y 2 / 2 σ 2 with σ = 10
  • Three circular retention (sink) regions with no decay (α = 1), scaled proportionally with grid resolution
  • Total simulation time T = 500 steps
For each resolution, two simulations were performed:
  • Structured case: curvature, nonlocal coupling, and retention zones enabled.
  • Control case: flat curvature, no nonlocal coupling, and no retention zones.
At the final timestep, the two-dimensional Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of the memory field was computed, and the magnitude spectrum log(1 + ∣FFT∣) was visualized for comparison.

Appendix F.3. Results and Interpretation

Figure A1 compares the real-space memory fields and their corresponding Fourier spectra for both grid resolutions. In the structured simulations, the Fourier spectra at both 100 × 100 and 256 × 256 resolutions exhibit a pronounced central low-frequency peak accompanied by approximately concentric radial bands. These low-frequency features sharpen and become smoother at higher resolution, indicating that they are associated with genuine large-scale organization of the memory field rather than numerical artifacts.
In contrast, narrow anisotropic bands aligned with the grid axes are visible at higher spatial frequencies, particularly at the lower (100 × 100) resolution. Such axis-aligned features are consistent with standard discretization and aliasing effects of FFTs on square lattices and are therefore not interpreted as physical vacuum structures.
The control simulations at both resolutions display nearly isotropic, featureless Fourier spectra characteristic of spatially uncorrelated noise. Importantly, the absence of structured low-frequency peaks in the control cases confirms that the organized spectral features observed in the structured simulations do not arise from the grid alone.
Minor angular modulation at higher spatial frequencies is visible at 100 × 100 resolution but is substantially reduced at 256 × 256, consistent with expected discretization effects. The persistence and sharpening of the low-frequency, approximately isotropic spectral structure under grid refinement demonstrate that the principal features emphasized in Section 3.6 are not artifacts of the square lattice, whereas the high-frequency, axis-aligned bands are numerical in origin.
Figure A1. Grid-resolution robustness of the vacuum memory Fourier spectra. Top row: final memory fields for structured and control simulations. Bottom row: corresponding Fourier magnitude spectra log(1 + ∣FFT∣). Left panels show results for the original 100 × 100 grid; right panels show results for a higher-resolution 256 × 256 grid. The structured memory field exhibits a robust low-frequency peak and approximately radial organization at both resolutions, sharpening at higher resolution, while the control spectra remain isotropic and noise-like. Axis-aligned high-frequency features are attributed to grid discretization and aliasing effects rather than physical structure.
Figure A1. Grid-resolution robustness of the vacuum memory Fourier spectra. Top row: final memory fields for structured and control simulations. Bottom row: corresponding Fourier magnitude spectra log(1 + ∣FFT∣). Left panels show results for the original 100 × 100 grid; right panels show results for a higher-resolution 256 × 256 grid. The structured memory field exhibits a robust low-frequency peak and approximately radial organization at both resolutions, sharpening at higher resolution, while the control spectra remain isotropic and noise-like. Axis-aligned high-frequency features are attributed to grid discretization and aliasing effects rather than physical structure.
Fractalfract 10 00117 g0a1

Appendix G. Robustness and Control Analyses

Appendix G.1. Phase-Coherence Robustness Under Structured vs. Random Phase Memory

To validate the phase-guided particle coalescence observed in Section 3.8, we performed a control experiment replacing the structured phase memory with spatially random phase fields at every timestep. The contrast in outcomes is stark:
  • Structured Phase: All trajectories collapse onto a single path (final spread ≈ 0.0000).
  • Random Phase: Particles diverge significantly (final spread ≈ 3.04).
This confirms that Bohmian trajectory collapse is a robust consequence of coherent memory fields and not a generic feature of the algorithm.
Figure A2. Left: Particle trajectories with structured quantum phase memory. Right: Same simulation with random phase memory. Final spreads: 0.0000 vs. 3.04, respectively.
Figure A2. Left: Particle trajectories with structured quantum phase memory. Right: Same simulation with random phase memory. Final spreads: 0.0000 vs. 3.04, respectively.
Fractalfract 10 00117 g0a2

Appendix G.2. Robustness of Curvature-Modulated Trajectories

To assess whether the particle convergence in Section 3.9 reflects a genuine effect of curvature-modulated vacuum memory, we replaced the smooth curvature field with uncorrelated noise. Results show:
  • Structured Curvature: All 30 trajectories bend toward the curvature center, with final spread σᵧ ≈ 0.0000.
  • Random Curvature: The particle distribution becomes broad and incoherent (σᵧ ≈ 14.20).
This 30-fold difference confirms the essential role of structured geometry in vacuum memory dynamics.
Figure A3. Left: Particle guidance with Gaussian curvature. Right: Random curvature destroys convergence. Final spread in y: 0.0000 vs. 14.20.
Figure A3. Left: Particle guidance with Gaussian curvature. Right: Random curvature destroys convergence. Final spread in y: 0.0000 vs. 14.20.
Fractalfract 10 00117 g0a3

Appendix G.3. Robustness of Memory Entanglement Dynamics

In Section 3.10, we observed synchronization between distant memory sites coupled through a nonlocal vacuum memory channel. To verify this was not a stochastic artifact, we repeated the simulation 30 times with randomized initial conditions and noise.
  • The average final Pearson correlation across simulations was ⟨ρ_final⟩ ≈ 0.553 ± 0.675.
  • Despite fluctuations, most runs displayed strong convergence.
This confirms that informational coupling induces reproducible long-range correlation akin to entanglement.
Figure A4. Histogram of final Pearson correlations across 30 runs of the two-site memory model. The mean correlation stabilizes near 0.55, supporting the robustness of memory-based synchronization.
Figure A4. Histogram of final Pearson correlations across 30 runs of the two-site memory model. The mean correlation stabilizes near 0.55, supporting the robustness of memory-based synchronization.
Fractalfract 10 00117 g0a4

Appendix G.4. Statistical Stress Tests of Two-Slit Interference Under Vacuum Memory

Random Vacuum Memory
In a control test using the setup from Section 3.11.1, we measured fringe visibility under random vacuum memory fields. Results (Figure A5a):
  • Visibility remains ≈ 0.95 across λ ∈ [0, 1.0].
  • Pearson correlation r = 0.108, p = 0.845 → not significant.
Conclusion: Quantum interference is resilient to unstructured memory noise.
Phase-Sensitive Vacuum Memory
In contrast, phase-sensitive feedback fields (Section 3.11.2) show clear suppression of coherence (Figure A5b):
  • Visibility drops from 0.95 → 0.21 as λ increases.
  • Pearson r = –0.972, p = 0.0056 → highly significant.
Conclusion: Structured phase memory mimics decoherence, collapsing superpositions even in the absence of measurement.
Figure A5. (a) Fringe visibility under random memory remains flat. (b) Visibility under phase-sensitive memory decreases significantly with λ, confirming decoherence via coherent informational feedback.
Figure A5. (a) Fringe visibility under random memory remains flat. (b) Visibility under phase-sensitive memory decreases significantly with λ, confirming decoherence via coherent informational feedback.
Fractalfract 10 00117 g0a5

Appendix H. Speculative Scaling and Physical Interpretation

The estimates presented in this appendix are purely heuristic and are intended to provide order-of-magnitude intuition for how the dimensionless quantities used in the toy model might be related to physical units. They are not derived from first principles and should not be interpreted as quantitative predictions or as evidence that the modeled vacuum memory corresponds to a real physical field.
While the simulations presented here are qualitative, it is instructive to consider potential physical scales at which vacuum memory effects might become detectable. If the memory field M(x,t) exerts an effective informational force, the induced particle velocity perturbation can be estimated as:
δ v x , t ~ λ m e m M x
Assuming a typical normalized memory gradient ∂M/∂x∼0.1 and a coupling strength λmem∼5, we obtain a velocity deviation δv∼0.5 in simulation units. Mapping this to physical units, with a spatial domain size L∼100 μm and timescales Δt∼10−12 s, the induced physical velocity perturbation would be approximately δvphys∼5 × 104 m/s. Although small, such deviations could, in principle, be detected via precision interferometry, Casimir force anomalies, or engineered analog systems such as Bose–Einstein condensates simulating curved space-time. Figure A6 illustrates a typical memory field and its spatial gradient, highlighting the regions where informational forces are strongest.
Figure A6. Memory field M(x) (solid line) and its spatial gradient ∂xM(x) (dashed line) extracted from the final stage of the simulation (in arbitrary simulation units). The memory gradient acts as an effective informational force, modifying particle trajectories by inducing curvature toward regions of higher memory accumulation. The peak gradients correspond to zones of maximal informational steering, offering a mechanism by which vacuum memory can actively influence particle motion.
Figure A6. Memory field M(x) (solid line) and its spatial gradient ∂xM(x) (dashed line) extracted from the final stage of the simulation (in arbitrary simulation units). The memory gradient acts as an effective informational force, modifying particle trajectories by inducing curvature toward regions of higher memory accumulation. The peak gradients correspond to zones of maximal informational steering, offering a mechanism by which vacuum memory can actively influence particle motion.
Fractalfract 10 00117 g0a6

Appendix I. Speculative Experimental Proposals

The experimental proposals collected in this appendix are speculative and illustrative. They are not intended as concrete experimental predictions, nor do they imply that the phenomenological vacuum memory field introduced in this work corresponds to a real physical degree of freedom. Rather, these proposals are meant to suggest how aspects of the toy-model dynamics explored here might be emulated or probed in controlled analog systems or precision quantum platforms.

Appendix I.1. Phase-Coherence in Two-Slit Interferometry

Prediction:
Structured vacuum memory that retains and responds to the local quantum phase can suppress interference fringes, even in the absence of external decohering environments (see Section 3.11.2).
Proposed Test:
Conduct high-precision two-slit experiments using electrons or neutrons near programmable metamaterial substrates engineered to exhibit phase-retaining properties. These substrates could emulate weakly coupled memory fields.
  • Signal: Suppression of interference fringe visibility as memory coupling strength λ increases.
  • Expected Effect: Visibility reduction from V ≈ 0.95→0.20V across λ ∈ [0, 10].
  • Resolution Required: Detection of fringe visibility changes at the <5% level.

Appendix I.2. Particle Deflection in Curvature Analogs

Prediction:
Curvature-modulated vacuum memory fields can steer particle trajectories via informational gradients (see Section 3.9).
Proposed Test:
Employ Bose–Einstein condensates (BECs) with engineered spatial curvature potentials. Cold atoms or embedded impurities traversing these regions may experience measurable deflection.
  • Signal: Lateral displacement Δx in particle paths relative to flat-space control runs.
  • Expected Effect: Δx ≈ 5–10 units for λ = 100.
  • Experimental Analog: BECs with Gaussian curvature features of width σ ≈ 10 μm.
  • Resolution Required: Sub-micron spatial resolution in atom tracking.

Appendix I.3. Deviations in Casimir Forces from Structured Substrates

Prediction:
Large-scale vacuum memory gradients can modify local vacuum energy distributions, leading to detectable shifts in Casimir forces.
Proposed Test:
Perform precision Casimir force measurements near anisotropic or memory-encoded substrates capable of inducing directional memory gradients.
  • Signal: Orientation-dependent deviations in Casimir pressure.
  • Expected Effect: Relative force shift ΔF/F ≈ 10 − 6 for ∇M ≈ 10 − 5.
  • Feasibility: Requires next-generation force metrology with nanonewton or sub-nanonewton resolution.

Appendix I.4. Quantum Noise Correlation in Memory-Entangled Systems

Prediction:
Weak coupling between distant vacuum memory sites can lead to spontaneous emergence of nonlocal correlations, analogous to quantum entanglement (see Section 3.10).
Proposed Test:
Implement programmable quantum simulators (e.g., superconducting qubits or trapped ions) with tunable feedback reservoirs that simulate memory coupling.
  • Signal: Growth of Pearson correlation coefficient ρ(t) → >0.5 over time.
  • Expected Time Scale: t ≈ 5–10 simulation units.
  • Platform: Qubit arrays with engineered reservoir coupling or feedback-driven synchronization.

References

  1. Maldacena, J.; Susskind, L. Cool horizons for entangled black holes. arXiv 2013, arXiv:1306.0533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Maldacena, J. The Large-N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity. Int. J. Theor. Phys 1999, 38, 1113–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bekenstein, J.D. Black holes and entropy. Phys. Rev. D 1973, 7, 2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hawking, S.W. Particle creation by black holes. Commun. Math. Phys. 1975, 43, 199–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Page, D.N. Information in black hole radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993, 71, 3743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Almheiri, A.; Marolf, D.; Polchinski, J.; Sully, J. Black holes: Complementarity or firewalls? J. High Energ. Phys. 2013, 62, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bombelli, L.; Lee, J.; Meyer, D.; Sorkin, R. Space-time as a causal set. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987, 59, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sorkin, R.D. Causal Sets: Discrete Gravity. In Lectures on Quantum Gravity; Gomberoff, A., Marolf, D., Eds.; Series of the Centro De Estudios Científicos; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Henson, J. Comparing causality principles. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part B Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 2005, 36, 519–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Van Raamsdonk, M. Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 2010, 42, 2323–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Verlinde, E. On the origin of gravity and the laws of Newton. J. High Energy Phys. 2011, 29, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bohm, D. A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of ‘Hidden’ Variables. I and II. Phys. Rev. 1952, 85, 166–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Holland, P.R. The Quantum Theory of Motion: An Account of the de Broglie–Bohm Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jacobson, T. Thermodynamics of spacetime: The Einstein equation of state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 75, 1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wojciech, H. Zurek; Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical. Phys. Today 1991, 44, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schlosshauer, M. Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  17. Swingle, B. Entanglement Renormalization and Holography. Phys. Rev. 2012, D86, 065007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pastawski, F.; Yoshida, B.; Harlow, D.; Preskill, J. Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence. J. High Energy Phys. 2015, 2015, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Steinhauer, J. Observation of quantum Hawking radiation and its entanglement in an analogue black hole. Nat. Phys. 2016, 12, 959–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Barceló, C.; Liberati, S.; Visser, M. Analogue Gravity. Living Rev. Relativ. 2005, 8, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bianchi, E.; Myers, R.C. On the architecture of spacetime geometry. Class. Quantum Gravity 2014, 31, 214002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Harlow, D. The Ryu–Takayanagi Formula from Quantum Error Correction. Commun. Math. Phys. 2017, 354, 865–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dürr, D.; Goldstein, S.; Tumulka, R.; Zanghì, N. Bohmian mechanics and quantum field theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 090402, Reprint in Quantum Physics Without Quantum Philosophy; Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., Zanghì, N., Eds.; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hu, B.L.; Verdaguer, E. Stochastic Gravity: Theory and Applications. Living Rev. Relativ. 2008, 11, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Birrell, N.D.; Davies, P.C.W. Quantum Fields in Curved Space; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1982. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Graphical abstract and algorithmic overview of the vacuum memory simulation. The figure summarizes the structure and time evolution of the discrete vacuum memory model. At each timestep, stochastic virtual events, curvature-enhanced activity, nonlocal memory transfer, local diffusion, and decay or retention rules update the memory field M(x,y,t). The resulting structured memory can optionally couple to particle dynamics (pilot-wave and curvature-guided trajectories), memory entanglement models, or quantum wavefunction evolution in two-slit interference simulations. This graphical overview provides a unified conceptual map of the model components explored throughout the paper.
Figure 1. Graphical abstract and algorithmic overview of the vacuum memory simulation. The figure summarizes the structure and time evolution of the discrete vacuum memory model. At each timestep, stochastic virtual events, curvature-enhanced activity, nonlocal memory transfer, local diffusion, and decay or retention rules update the memory field M(x,y,t). The resulting structured memory can optionally couple to particle dynamics (pilot-wave and curvature-guided trajectories), memory entanglement models, or quantum wavefunction evolution in two-slit interference simulations. This graphical overview provides a unified conceptual map of the model components explored throughout the paper.
Fractalfract 10 00117 g001
Figure 2. Schematic of the simulation domain. The diagram illustrates the spatial geometry used in the vacuum memory simulations, including the central Gaussian curvature well, memory-retaining sink regions, and the initialization zones for particle ensembles. This schematic defines the geometry independently of the numerical heatmaps shown in Section 3.
Figure 2. Schematic of the simulation domain. The diagram illustrates the spatial geometry used in the vacuum memory simulations, including the central Gaussian curvature well, memory-retaining sink regions, and the initialization zones for particle ensembles. This schematic defines the geometry independently of the numerical heatmaps shown in Section 3.
Fractalfract 10 00117 g002
Figure 3. Two-point correlation function of the vacuum memory field. The plot shows the average product of memory values between pairs of spatial points as a function of their Euclidean distance. A strong peak at short distances confirms local memory propagation, while a sustained non-zero correlation at longer distances reveals subtle but persistent non-local correlations consistent with entanglement-like effects in the simulated vacuum. Fluctuations at larger distances arise from the stochastic nature of virtual events.
Figure 3. Two-point correlation function of the vacuum memory field. The plot shows the average product of memory values between pairs of spatial points as a function of their Euclidean distance. A strong peak at short distances confirms local memory propagation, while a sustained non-zero correlation at longer distances reveals subtle but persistent non-local correlations consistent with entanglement-like effects in the simulated vacuum. Fluctuations at larger distances arise from the stochastic nature of virtual events.
Fractalfract 10 00117 g003
Figure 4. Vacuum memory field influenced by simulated space-time curvature. Memory intensity is highest near the center of the grid, where a Gaussian gravitational well was applied. The curvature modifies both the frequency of virtual events and the rate of memory decay, leading to enhanced retention and accumulation of vacuum information in curved regions. Memory clearly accumulates and persists in gravitational wells, demonstrating that curvature significantly enhances vacuum memory retention.
Figure 4. Vacuum memory field influenced by simulated space-time curvature. Memory intensity is highest near the center of the grid, where a Gaussian gravitational well was applied. The curvature modifies both the frequency of virtual events and the rate of memory decay, leading to enhanced retention and accumulation of vacuum information in curved regions. Memory clearly accumulates and persists in gravitational wells, demonstrating that curvature significantly enhances vacuum memory retention.
Fractalfract 10 00117 g004
Figure 5. Vacuum memory field with combined effects of space-time curvature and memory-retaining sinks. The three circular regions demonstrate visible memory accumulation without decay, simulating the behavior of event horizons. The central gravitational well further enhances memory activity, reflecting the complementary influences of geometry and horizon-based confinement.
Figure 5. Vacuum memory field with combined effects of space-time curvature and memory-retaining sinks. The three circular regions demonstrate visible memory accumulation without decay, simulating the behavior of event horizons. The central gravitational well further enhances memory activity, reflecting the complementary influences of geometry and horizon-based confinement.
Fractalfract 10 00117 g005
Figure 6. Entropy map of the vacuum memory field. Brighter areas correspond to higher entropy. The gravitational well and memory-retaining sinks exhibit elevated entropy levels, consistent with their role as attractors and retainers of diverse vacuum information. Darker peripheral regions reflect more uniform, random fluctuations.
Figure 6. Entropy map of the vacuum memory field. Brighter areas correspond to higher entropy. The gravitational well and memory-retaining sinks exhibit elevated entropy levels, consistent with their role as attractors and retainers of diverse vacuum information. Darker peripheral regions reflect more uniform, random fluctuations.
Fractalfract 10 00117 g006
Figure 7. (a) Control simulation memory field without curvature or non-locality. The memory distribution appears statistically uniform and noisy, showing no sign of accumulation or structure. (b) Corresponding entropy map for the control simulation. The entropy remains relatively homogeneous and lacks the pronounced low- or high-entropy zones observed in the full model, confirming the absence of organized information retention.
Figure 7. (a) Control simulation memory field without curvature or non-locality. The memory distribution appears statistically uniform and noisy, showing no sign of accumulation or structure. (b) Corresponding entropy map for the control simulation. The entropy remains relatively homogeneous and lacks the pronounced low- or high-entropy zones observed in the full model, confirming the absence of organized information retention.
Fractalfract 10 00117 g007
Figure 8. (a) Fourier spectrum of the structured vacuum memory field. The presence of non-uniform low-frequency bands and distinct intensity peaks confirms the existence of organized spatial features arising from curvature and non-local coupling. (b) Fourier spectrum of the control memory field. The dark curves near the figure margins result from logarithmic compression of very low-magnitude high-frequency components, combined with the FFT’s symmetric structure. These artifacts reflect the lack of significant high-frequency content, reinforcing the control field’s unstructured nature. The flat, isotropic distribution is consistent with random noise, exhibiting no coherent frequency structure.
Figure 8. (a) Fourier spectrum of the structured vacuum memory field. The presence of non-uniform low-frequency bands and distinct intensity peaks confirms the existence of organized spatial features arising from curvature and non-local coupling. (b) Fourier spectrum of the control memory field. The dark curves near the figure margins result from logarithmic compression of very low-magnitude high-frequency components, combined with the FFT’s symmetric structure. These artifacts reflect the lack of significant high-frequency content, reinforcing the control field’s unstructured nature. The flat, isotropic distribution is consistent with random noise, exhibiting no coherent frequency structure.
Fractalfract 10 00117 g008
Figure 9. (a) Bar chart comparing average entropy inside vs. outside memory-retaining zones over 10 simulation runs. The consistent difference across runs confirms that these zones retain more diverse information. (b) Correlation at a fixed mid-range distance (radius 25) measured over 10 runs. The persistent non-zero values highlight the robustness of long-range correlation patterns in the memory field.
Figure 9. (a) Bar chart comparing average entropy inside vs. outside memory-retaining zones over 10 simulation runs. The consistent difference across runs confirms that these zones retain more diverse information. (b) Correlation at a fixed mid-range distance (radius 25) measured over 10 runs. The persistent non-zero values highlight the robustness of long-range correlation patterns in the memory field.
Fractalfract 10 00117 g009
Figure 10. Particles guided by phase-memory M(x, t) = S(x, t). Ten initially distinct test particles (thin colored lines) all collapse onto the same quantum trajectory (bold line) when moved according to X ˙ i t = 1 / m x M X i t , t , demonstrating that a vacuum memory field storing the full wavefunction phase reproduces exact Bohmian guidance.
Figure 10. Particles guided by phase-memory M(x, t) = S(x, t). Ten initially distinct test particles (thin colored lines) all collapse onto the same quantum trajectory (bold line) when moved according to X ˙ i t = 1 / m x M X i t , t , demonstrating that a vacuum memory field storing the full wavefunction phase reproduces exact Bohmian guidance.
Fractalfract 10 00117 g010
Figure 11. (a) Trajectories of Bohmian particles under varying vacuum memory coupling strengths λ, overlaid on the gravitational curvature field. Stronger memory coupling leads to visible bending of trajectories toward the curvature center. (b) Mean lateral bending Δx of the particle ensemble as a function of vacuum memory strength λ. Higher λ values produce greater convergence, confirming memory-structured guidance.
Figure 11. (a) Trajectories of Bohmian particles under varying vacuum memory coupling strengths λ, overlaid on the gravitational curvature field. Stronger memory coupling leads to visible bending of trajectories toward the curvature center. (b) Mean lateral bending Δx of the particle ensemble as a function of vacuum memory strength λ. Higher λ values produce greater convergence, confirming memory-structured guidance.
Fractalfract 10 00117 g011
Figure 12. Evolution of vacuum memory dynamics at two nonlocally coupled sites (A and B). (Left) Memory values MA(t) and MB(t) evolve under mutual coupling and stochastic noise, showing gradual convergence. (Right) Running Pearson correlation coefficient ρ(MA,MB) over time, computed with a sliding window. Initially uncorrelated, the two memory fields develop strong anti-correlation approaching ρ ≈ −1 as the mutual memory feedback dominates over stochastic noise. The dashed line marks the onset of visible synchronization around t ≈ 9.
Figure 12. Evolution of vacuum memory dynamics at two nonlocally coupled sites (A and B). (Left) Memory values MA(t) and MB(t) evolve under mutual coupling and stochastic noise, showing gradual convergence. (Right) Running Pearson correlation coefficient ρ(MA,MB) over time, computed with a sliding window. Initially uncorrelated, the two memory fields develop strong anti-correlation approaching ρ ≈ −1 as the mutual memory feedback dominates over stochastic noise. The dashed line marks the onset of visible synchronization around t ≈ 9.
Fractalfract 10 00117 g012
Figure 13. Fringe visibility vs. memory strength λ for random vacuum memory coupling. Despite increasing λ, the visibility remains effectively constant, indicating that quantum interference is robust against random, unstructured vacuum fluctuations.
Figure 13. Fringe visibility vs. memory strength λ for random vacuum memory coupling. Despite increasing λ, the visibility remains effectively constant, indicating that quantum interference is robust against random, unstructured vacuum fluctuations.
Fractalfract 10 00117 g013
Figure 14. Suppression of quantum interference by structured vacuum memory. (a) Intensity maps for three memory strengths (λ = 0, 5, 10) show progressive suppression of interference in the two-slit experiment. (b) Fringe visibility as a function of memory strength λ. Visibility declines monotonically, confirming that phase-sensitive vacuum memory mimics environmental decoherence.
Figure 14. Suppression of quantum interference by structured vacuum memory. (a) Intensity maps for three memory strengths (λ = 0, 5, 10) show progressive suppression of interference in the two-slit experiment. (b) Fringe visibility as a function of memory strength λ. Visibility declines monotonically, confirming that phase-sensitive vacuum memory mimics environmental decoherence.
Fractalfract 10 00117 g014
Table 1. Core simulation parameters used in the intensity-based vacuum memory model. Parameter values were selected to ensure numerical stability and to allow the emergence of structured memory patterns within a finite simulation time. All quantities are dimensionless and phenomenological.
Table 1. Core simulation parameters used in the intensity-based vacuum memory model. Parameter values were selected to ensure numerical stability and to allow the emergence of structured memory patterns within a finite simulation time. All quantities are dimensionless and phenomenological.
ParameterSymbolValue(s)Notes
Grid size100 × 1002D memory lattice
Time stepsT500Discrete iterations
Local event probabilityp00.02Virtual events
Propagation probabilityδ0.3Neighbor diffusion
Nonlocal link probabilitypnl0.1ER = EPR-inspired
Decay factorα0.99Outside sinks
Curvature profileR(x,y)GaussianFixed
Sink radius5No decay
Particle timestepΔtsee textVaries by experiment
Memory couplingλmultiple valuesScenario-dependent
Table 2. Comparison of interference fringe visibility under random and phase-sensitive vacuum memory. Random, unstructured vacuum memory preserves quantum coherence across all tested coupling strengths, whereas structured phase-sensitive memory induces strong, monotonic suppression of interference, consistent with phenomenological decoherence.
Table 2. Comparison of interference fringe visibility under random and phase-sensitive vacuum memory. Random, unstructured vacuum memory preserves quantum coherence across all tested coupling strengths, whereas structured phase-sensitive memory induces strong, monotonic suppression of interference, consistent with phenomenological decoherence.
Memory TypeλFringe Visibility V
None0≈0.95
Random memory0.1≥0.93
Random memory0.5≥0.92
Random memory1.0≥0.91
Phase-sensitive5≈0.5
Phase-sensitive10≈0.2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Buzea, C.G.; Mirila, D.C.; Nedeff, F.; Nedeff, V.; Panainte-Lehăduș, M.; Rusu, O.; Dobreci, L.; Agop, M.; Grierosu, I.-C.; Ghizdovat, V. A Discrete Heuristic Model of Vacuum Memory with Fractal-like Structure: Entropy, Fourier Signatures, Bohmian Guidance and Decoherence in a Two-Slit Interferometer. Fractal Fract. 2026, 10, 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract10020117

AMA Style

Buzea CG, Mirila DC, Nedeff F, Nedeff V, Panainte-Lehăduș M, Rusu O, Dobreci L, Agop M, Grierosu I-C, Ghizdovat V. A Discrete Heuristic Model of Vacuum Memory with Fractal-like Structure: Entropy, Fourier Signatures, Bohmian Guidance and Decoherence in a Two-Slit Interferometer. Fractal and Fractional. 2026; 10(2):117. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract10020117

Chicago/Turabian Style

Buzea, Călin Gheorghe, Diana Carmen Mirila, Florin Nedeff, Valentin Nedeff, Mirela Panainte-Lehăduș, Oana Rusu, Lucian Dobreci, Maricel Agop, Irena-Cristina Grierosu, and Vlad Ghizdovat. 2026. "A Discrete Heuristic Model of Vacuum Memory with Fractal-like Structure: Entropy, Fourier Signatures, Bohmian Guidance and Decoherence in a Two-Slit Interferometer" Fractal and Fractional 10, no. 2: 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract10020117

APA Style

Buzea, C. G., Mirila, D. C., Nedeff, F., Nedeff, V., Panainte-Lehăduș, M., Rusu, O., Dobreci, L., Agop, M., Grierosu, I.-C., & Ghizdovat, V. (2026). A Discrete Heuristic Model of Vacuum Memory with Fractal-like Structure: Entropy, Fourier Signatures, Bohmian Guidance and Decoherence in a Two-Slit Interferometer. Fractal and Fractional, 10(2), 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract10020117

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop