Next Article in Journal
Comparison of COVID-19 Severity and Mortality Rates in the First Four Epidemic Waves in Hungary in a Single-Center Study with Special Regard to Critically Ill Patients in an Intensive Care Unit
Next Article in Special Issue
Genetic Diversity of Rotaviruses Circulating in Pediatric Patients and Domestic Animals in Thailand
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Demographics and Time to Sample Processing on the qPCR Detection of Pathogenic Leptospira spp. from Human Samples in the National Reference Laboratory for Leptospirosis, Brazil
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatial Distribution and Temporal Trend of Childhood Tuberculosis in Brazil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High Diversity of Giardia duodenalis Assemblages and Sub-Assemblages in Asymptomatic School Children in Ibadan, Nigeria

by
Muyideen K. Tijani
1,2,†,
Pamela C. Köster
3,†,
Isabel Guadano-Procesi
4,5,
Imo S. George
1,
Elizabeth Abodunrin
1,
Adedamola Adeola
1,
Alejandro Dashti
3,
Begoña Bailo
3,
David González-Barrio
3,* and
David Carmena
3,6,*
1
Cellular Parasitology Programme, Cell Biology and Genetics Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan 200284, Nigeria
2
Division of Clinical Chemistry and Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, 221 85 Lund, Sweden
3
Parasitology Reference and Research Laboratory, Spanish National Centre for Microbiology, Health Institute Carlos III, 28220 Madrid, Spain
4
Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy
5
PhD Program in Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy
6
Center for Biomedical Research Network (CIBER) in Infectious Diseases, Health Institute Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8(3), 152; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8030152
Submission received: 26 December 2022 / Revised: 25 February 2023 / Accepted: 26 February 2023 / Published: 28 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Global Burden of Infectious Diseases in Children)

Abstract

:
Giardia duodenalis is a significant contributor to the burden of diarrheal disease in sub-Saharan Africa. This study assesses the occurrence and molecular diversity of G. duodenalis and other intestinal parasites in apparently healthy children (n = 311) in Ibadan, Nigeria. Microscopy was used as a screening method and PCR and Sanger sequencing as confirmatory and genotyping methods, respectively. Haplotype analyses were performed to examine associations between genetic variants and epidemiological variables. At microscopy examination, G. duodenalis was the most prevalent parasite found (29.3%, 91/311; 95% CI: 24.3–34.7), followed by Entamoeba spp. (18.7%, 58/311; 14.5–23.4), Ascaris lumbricoides (1.3%, 4/311; 0.4–3.3), and Taenia sp. (0.3%, 1/311; 0.01–1.8). qPCR confirmed the presence of G. duodenalis in 76.9% (70/91) of the microscopy-positive samples. Of them, 65.9% (60/91) were successfully genotyped. Assemblage B (68.3%, 41/60) was more prevalent than assemblage A (28.3%, 17/60). Mixed A + B infections were identified in two samples (3.3%, 2/60). These facts, together with the absence of animal-adapted assemblages, suggest that human transmission of giardiasis was primarily anthroponotic. Efforts to control G. duodenalis (and other fecal-orally transmitted pathogens) should focus on providing safe drinking water and improving sanitation and personal hygiene practices.

1. Introduction

Giardia duodenalis (synonyms G. intestinalis, G. lamblia) is the etiological agent of giardiasis, a major contributor to the burden of diarrheal disease causing near 190 million symptomatic infections per year globally, adding up to ∼171,100 daily-adjusted life years lost [1]. Clinical infection ranges from asymptomatic carrier state to severe abdominal pain, diarrhea, vomiting, flatulence, malabsorption, anorexia, and weight loss [2]. Long-term sequelae including postinfectious irritable bowel disease and chronic fatigue have also been reported [3]. Despite its medical importance, no human vaccine is available against giardiasis [4], and clinical resistance against 5-nitroimidazoles (the most used drugs for first-line treatment) occurs in up to 50% of cases [5]. Transmission is via the fecal–oral route, either by ingestion of water or food contaminated with cysts of the parasite, or through direct contact with infected humans, animals, or fomites [6].
Giardiasis disproportionally affects young children, many of whom are undernourished, living in limited-resource settings without or with inadequate access to clean water or good sanitation [7]. In endemic settings, giardiasis has been consistently associated with childhood growth faltering, failure to thrive, and impaired cognitive development [8,9]. Findings from prospective longitudinal cohort studies conducted in sub-Saharan African countries indicate that Giardia was not an independent risk factor for diarrhea in children [10,11,12]. Integrating asymptomatic carriage of Giardia with its role as a diarrhea-causing agent in these settings is, therefore, challenging and controversial [13]. Several factors have been proposed to contribute to the outcome of the infection, including nutritional [14], microbial [15], metabolic [16], and pathogen-strain [17] variables.
Giardia duodenalis is now known as a multispecies complex comprising eight (A–H) genotypically distinct assemblages [18]. Most human Giardia infections are due to assemblages A or B, although human cases by animal-adapted assemblages C-F are less frequently reported [18,19]. Several molecular-based surveys have attempted to correlate the presence of diarrhea with the genotype of G. duodenalis. Large prospective case-control studies conducted in Bangladesh and Mozambique generated contradictory results [20,21], highlighting the need for additional studies aiming at investigating the molecular diversity of the parasite in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals of all age groups.
In Nigeria, the annual number of deaths from diarrheal diseases per 100,000 people decreased from 275.3 in 1990 to 92.5 in 2019 [22]. Although Giardia infection is not usually associated with mortality, giardiasis seems widely present in the country, affecting both asymptomatic and clinical individuals and livestock (Table 1) [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. In addition, very little is currently known on the genetic variability of G. duodenalis circulating in Nigerian human populations. This study aims at investigating the occurrence and molecular diversity of G. duodenalis in school children in Ibadan, a city in the Southwestern part of Nigeria.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants

In this two-point cross-sectional study, individual stool samples were collected from asymptomatic school children aged 5–17 from four districts in Ibadan metropolis: Boluwaji, Moniya, Orogun, and Yemetu. Ibadan is the capital and most populous city of Oyo State in Southwestern Nigeria. It is the third largest city by population in the country after Lagos and Kano, with a total population of 3,649,000 as of 2021. Ibadan has a tropical savanna climate, with an average annual temperature of 25.9 °C and an annual precipitation of about 1467 mm, mostly concentrated in the period August–October. The warmest month is February (average temperature: 28.9 °C) and the coolest month is August (average temperature: 24.4 °C). This study was carried out between August–December 2017 and May–July 2018.

2.2. Stool Sample Collection

Informative meetings were held at scheduled times with school pupils on the causes, symptoms, and mode of transmission of giardiasis. Those willing to participate in this study were provided with transparent, sterile stool recipients containing no preservatives and instructed on how to collect a stool sample in a simple and safe way. The stool recipients were labelled with individual numeric codes allocated to each participating child for easy identification of samples. Collected fresh stool samples were placed on ice and transported within one hour to the Cellular Parasitology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Ibadan, for further analysis.

2.3. Epidemiological Questionnaires

Individual standardized questionnaires in Yoruba and English languages were completed by a member of our research team in face-to-face interviews with each participating child at sample collection. Questions included demographics, hand and vegetable washing, contact with domestic animals and livestock, source of drinking water, use of treated water, latrine use, and garbage disposal. The information obtained was entered into an Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) and used for risk association analyses.

2.4. Microscopy

Freshly collected stool samples were microscopically examined within 24 h of collection. The formol-ether concentration technique was used [51]. Briefly, 1–2 g of the fecal sample was homogenized in 7 mL of 10% formalin and sieved through surgical gauze as a mechanical filter to remove fecal debris. The sieved suspension was transferred into a clean 15 mL centrifuge tube and 3 mL of ethyl acetate were added. After vigorous shaking, the mixture was centrifuged for 3 min at 3000 rpm. The supernatant was carefully discarded, and fecal smears made from the sediment. Smears were then stained with 1% Lugol’s iodine and examined at 200× for screening and 400× for confirmation of Giardia cysts. Each slide was examined by two independent microscopists. Smears yielding discrepant results were resolved by a third microscopist.

2.5. DNA Extraction and Purification

Genomic DNA was isolated from about 200 mg of fecal samples yielding positive/discrepant results for G. duodenalis at microscopy examination by using the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted and purified DNA samples were eluted in 200 µL of PCR-grade water. Fecal DNA samples were shipped to the Parasitology Reference and Research Laboratory of the National Centre for Microbiology (Majadahonda, Spain) in August 2022 for downstream molecular testing.

2.6. Molecular Confirmation and Characterization of Giardia duodenalis

Detection of G. duodenalis DNA was achieved using a real-time PCR (qPCR) method targeting a 62-bp region of the gene, codifying the small subunit ribosomal RNA (ssu rRNA) of the parasite [52].
For assessing the molecular diversity of the parasite, we adopted a sequence-based multilocus genotyping (MLST) scheme targeting the genes encoding for the ssu rRNA, the glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh), β-giardin (bg), and triose phosphate isomerase (tpi) proteins of the parasite. For assessing the molecular diversity of G. duodenalis at the assemblage level, a nested PCR was used to amplify a 300-bp fragment of the ssu rRNA gene [53,54]. The molecular diversity of the parasite at the sub-assemblage level was investigated only in Giardia isolates that tested positive by qPCR and yielded cycle threshold (CT) values ≤ 32. A semi-nested PCR was used to amplify a 432-bp fragment of the gdh gene [55], and nested PCRs were used to amplify 511 and 530 bp fragments of the bg and tpi genes, respectively [56,57].

2.7. General PCR and Electrophoretic Procedures

Detailed information on the PCR cycling conditions and oligonucleotides used for the molecular identification and/or characterization of the protozoan parasites investigated in the present study is presented in Tables S1 and S2, respectively. All the direct, semi-nested, and nested PCR protocols described above were conducted on a 2720 Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems Foster City, CA, USA). Reaction mixes always included 2.5 units of MyTAQTM DNA polymerase (Bioline GmbH, Luckenwalde, Germany), and 5–10 µL MyTAQTM Reaction Buffer containing 5 mM dNTPs and 15 mM MgCl2. Laboratory-confirmed positive and negative DNA samples of human origin were routinely used as controls and included in each round of PCR. PCR amplicons were visualized on 1.5% D5 agarose gels (Conda, Madrid, Spain) stained with Pronasafe (Conda) nucleic acid staining solutions.

2.8. Sanger Sequencing Analyses

Positive PCR products of the expected size were directly sequenced in both directions using appropriate internal primer sets (Table S1). DNA sequencing was conducted by capillary electrophoresis using the BigDye® Terminator chemistry (Applied Biosystems) on an ABI PRISM 3130 automated DNA sequencer. Generated DNA consensus sequences were aligned to appropriate reference sequences using MEGA X [58] for species confirmation and genotype identification. The G. duodenalis sequences obtained in this study have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers OP946920–OP946928 (ssu rRNA locus), OP947099–OP947117 (gdh locus), OP947118–OP947130 (bg locus), and OP947131–OP947138 (tpi locus).

2.9. Haplotype Variability

Significant variables for haplotype variability analysis were selected applying Categorical Principal Components Analysis (CATPCA) and conducting the TwoStep Cluster Analysis procedure through IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) [59], with the purpose of revealing natural groupings within the dataset of continuous and categorical variables and their most relevant input predictors. Cronbach’s Alpha overall value was considered to measure the internal dataset’s consistency.
For the TwoStep Cluster Analysis, the number of clusters was not provided in advance, and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) was used to determine the best cluster solution. The input predictor with the highest values of importance was then considered for the haplotype variability analysis and network.

3. Results

In this study, 311 stool samples and corresponding questionnaires were collected from asymptomatic school children. Of these, 145 (46.6%) were male and 165 (53.1%) were female. Gender was unknown for a single (0.3%) child. The age of the participating school children ranged from five to 17 years with a median age of 10 years. This rate did not differ between Giardia-infected and uninfected school children.

3.1. Microscopy

Overall, 31.5% (98/311, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 26.4–36.7) of fecal samples examined by microscopy tested positive for at least one intestinal parasite (Table 2). Giardia duodenalis was the most prevalent parasite found (29.3%, 91/311; 95% CI: 24.3–34.7), followed by Entamoeba spp. (18.7%, 58/311; 14.5–23.4), Ascaris lumbricoides (1.3%, 4/311; 0.4–3.3), and Taenia sp. (0.3%, 1/311; 0.01–1.8). Giardia duodenalis was more frequently found in coinfection with Entamoeba spp. (15.8%, 49/311) than in monoinfection (11.9%, 37/311). Out of the 91 Giardia-positive samples, 18.7% (17/91) corresponded to smears yielding discrepant results at microscopy examination (Table S3).

3.2. Confirmation of G. duodenalis by qPCR

All 91 fecal DNA samples yielding positive/discrepant results for G. duodenalis at microscopy examination were subjected to qPCR testing to confirm the presence of the parasite. qPCR positive results were obtained in 76.9% (70/91) of the samples, including 58.8% (10/17) of those generating discrepant results at microscopy. Yielded CT values ranged from 20.0 to 39.6 (median: 30.0; standard deviation: 5.1). Most (65.7%, 46/70) of the qPCR-positive samples yielded CT values ≤ 32.

3.3. Genotyping and Subgenotyping of G. duodenalis Isolates

All 91 fecal DNA samples yielding positive/discrepant results for G. duodenalis at microscopy examination were subjected to nested ssu-PCR to ascertain the assemblage of the parasite involved. Of them, 63.7% (58/91) were successfully genotyped at this locus. These included two isolates that tested negative by qPCR (Table S3). Sequence analyses revealed the presence of assemblage A (29.3%, 17/58) and assemblage B (70.7, 41/58). Table S4 summarizes the molecular data generated at the ssu rRNA locus. Out of the 17 assemblage A sequences, 16 showed 100% identity with the reference sequence used (GenBank accession number AF199446), with the remaining one differing from it by a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). Out of the 41 assemblage B sequences, 85.4% (35/41) were identical to reference sequence AF199447, with the remaining six sequences differing by 1–2 SNPs from it. All SNPs detected corresponded to ambiguous (double peak) positions (Table S4).
The molecular diversity of G. duodenalis at the sub-assemblage level was investigated at three (gdh, bg, and tpi) genetic markers. All 46 Giardia-positive DNA samples yielding qPCR CT values ≤ 32 were re-assessed under this scheme. Successful PCR amplifications and sequencing data were generated for 56.5% (26/46), 50.0% (23/46), and 26.1% (12/46) of the samples investigated at the gdh, bg, and tpi loci, respectively.
Overall, 65.9% (60/91) of the Giardia-positive samples were successfully genotyped at one locus at least (Table 3). MLST data at the four assessed loci were available for 11.7% (7/60) of samples. Subtyping data at a single locus, two loci, or three loci were available for 48.3% (29/60), 18.3% (11/60), and 21.7% (13/60) of samples, respectively. Assemblage B (68.3%, 41/60) was more prevalent than assemblage A (28.3%, 17/60). Mixed A + B infections were detected in two samples (3.3%, 2/60). No host-adapted assemblages of canine (C, D), feline (F), or livestock (E) origin were detected.
Table S5 shows the frequency and molecular diversity of G. duodenalis at the gdh locus. Out of the 26 gdh sequences, nine (34.6%) were assigned to the sub-assemblage AII. Of them, eight showed 100% identity with reference sequence L40510. Assemblages BIII and BIV were identified in 10 (38.5%) and two (7.7%) isolates, respectively. All 10 BIII sequences were different among them, differing by 2–8 SNPs with reference sequence AF069059. The same degree of high genetic variability was observed in the two BIV sequences, which differed by 1–4 SNPs with reference sequence L40508. Discordant BIII/BIV results were identified in an additional five sequences showing 8–13 SNPs when compared with reference sequence L40508.
Table S6 shows the frequency and molecular diversity of G. duodenalis at the bg locus. Out of the 23 bg sequences, eight were identified as sub-assemblage AII. Seven of them were identical to reference sequence AY072723. Four additional sequences were assigned to sub-assemblage AIII, all of them showing 100% identity with reference sequence AY072724. A total of 11 sequences were identified as assemblage B (the bg locus is not suitable for sub-assemblage discrimination), of which two were identical to reference sequence AY072727. The remaining nine sequences differed from it by 1–13 SNPs.
Table S7 shows the frequency and molecular diversity of G. duodenalis at the tpi locus. Out of the 12 tpi sequences, five were identified as sub-assemblage AII, all of them identical to reference sequence U57897. Six sequences were unambiguously characterized as sub-assemblage BIII, differing by 1–4 SNPs with reference sequence AF069561. An additional sequence yielded a discordant BIII/BIV result, differing by five SNPs with reference sequence AF069560. As in the case of gdh, most of these SNPs corresponded to double peaks.

3.4. Haplotype Variability

CATPCA Cronbach’s Alpha overall value (alpha = 0.99) showed evidence of good dataset reliability. The TwoStep Cluster Analysis revealed the existence of two clusters with a silhouette measure of cohesion and separation of 0.3 (fair). The first one represented 43.7% of individuals and the second one included 56.3% of children, with a relationship between the two of 1.29. The variable Sampled area resulted to be the input predictor with the highest value (Table S8); for this reason, it was selected as the main variable for the haplotype variability analysis.
Twenty-six different haplotypes were identified at the gdh locus, with the highest haplotype diversity (Hd) value of 0.9917 detected in the tpi locus. Haplotypes variability results are displayed in detail in Table 4 and visualized as network representations in Figure 1.
The haplotypes analysis shows assemblage B as having the highest variability, with few mutation steps between the several haplotypes detected, in contrast with assemblage A’s low diversity levels.
For all three loci considered, the haplotypes presenting the highest frequency of detection were not specific for a given area; indeed, they were near equally distributed between at least two different sampling areas, excepting assemblage A at the tpi locus (Figure 1C). There is no evidence of a specific haplotype segregation pattern related to a single geographical area, to contiguous sampling areas or to a specific molecular marker.

4. Discussion

In this microscopy-based study, one out of three apparently healthy school children were infected with intestinal parasites in Ibadan, Nigeria. Giardia duodenalis was the most frequent pathogen detected (29.3%), being present (alone or in combination) in 91 out of the 97 cases of the subclinical parasitic infections observed. Giardia duodenalis was more frequently found in association with members of the Entamoeba complex (n = 49) than in monoinfection (n = 37). Infections with nematode (A. lumbricoides) and cestode (Taenia sp.) parasites were sporadic (less than five cases).
The microscopy-based G. duodenalis infection rate detected (29.3%) was in line with those (3–60%) previously reported in Nigerian asymptomatic children [24,25,26,27]. Other studies conducted in the country have documented infection rates of 0.5–26% in children with diarrhea [29,30,31,32], of 0.6–25% in HIV+ patients [33,34,35], and of 0.6–48% in hospital outpatients [36,37,38,39]. These data were obtained in surveys conducted using microscopy (mostly on single stool samples from participating individuals), a diagnostic method known to lack diagnostic sensitivity [60]. These facts strongly suggest that current microscopy-based figures likely underestimate the true burden of G. duodenalis infection in Nigeria, particularly in apparently healthy individuals. Indeed, asymptomatic carriers are known to inadvertently spread the infection either in endemic [61] or non-endemic [62] areas. Under this scenario, highly sensitive PCR-based methods coupled with Sanger sequencing can be useful to (i) improve the detection of asymptomatic cases, and by (ii) determining genetic variants and assessing sources of infection, transmission pathways, and zoonotic potential.
The molecular characterization of microscopy-positive G. duodenalis isolates at the assemblage and sub-assemblage levels is the most important contribution of this study. This is particularly relevant in Nigeria, a country where molecular-based surveys are scarce. Indeed, human genotyping data is only available for five hospital outpatients in Kaduna state, all of them infected by the assemblage A of the parasite [37]. Zoonotic assemblages A and B have also been reported in goats and pigs [46,47] and in farmed rabbits [48]. Our study is also the first investigation adopting an MLST scheme to assess the genetic diversity of G. duodenalis in isolates of human origin, as the only previous survey available used the tpi locus only [37]. Of note, MLST analyses are relevant for investigating the epidemiology of G. duodenalis because they assist in detecting mixed infections involving different assemblages/sub-assemblages of the parasite and in characterizing sources of infection and zoonotic potential [63].
In our hands, the ssu-PCR yielded a higher PCR amplification success rate (63%) than the PCR protocols targeting the gdh, bg, and tpi loci (26–57%), even considering that the latter were only attempted in fecal DNA samples with qPCR CT values ≤ 32. This discrepancy can be explained by the superior diagnostic sensitivity of the multi-copy ssu rRNA gene compared to the single-copy gdh, bg, and tpi genes. Our typing analyses revealed that assemblage B was more prevalent than assemblage A (72% vs. 28%) in the pediatric population surveyed. This finding is in line with those previously reported in molecular surveys conducted in human populations in other sub-Saharan African countries including Angola (64% vs. 36%) [64], Ethiopia (82% vs. 18%) [65], Mozambique (90% vs. 8%) [21], Rwanda (86% vs. 13%) [9], Tanzania (79% vs. 21%) [66], and Zambia (73% vs. 27%) [67], among others. Remarkably, no canine-adapted (C, D), feline-adapted (F), or livestock-adapted (F) assemblages were found, suggesting that transmission of giardiasis in the surveyed pediatric population is primarily of anthroponotic nature. However, it should be noted that both assemblages A and B have zoonotic potential [68], so we cannot rule out the possibility that an unknown fraction of the G. duodenalis infections detected here were indeed of non-human origin. Additionally, previous molecular-based epidemiological studies conducted in Brazil and Syria have evidenced that sub-assemblage AII was more prevalently found in young children than in individuals of older ages [69,70]. In the present study, AII results were found in 20% (12/60) of the participating children. It would be interesting to see whether this proportion remains unchanged in further studies targeting individuals of all age groups.
In line with the results generated in previous molecular studies in endemic areas [21,71,72,73,74], a much higher molecular variability was observed in assemblage B sequences than in assemblage A sequences regardless the genetic marker used and the geographical origin of the samples. A significant proportion of B sequences (5/17 within the gdh marker and 1/12 within the tpi marker) corresponded to inconsistent BIII/BIV results. Most of the ambiguous nucleotidic positions in discordant BIII/BIV sequences involved double peaks, indicative of either true intra-assemblage BIII + BIV mixed infections, or the direct result of a genetic recombination mechanism [75,76]. Of note, prior analyses of sequenced G. duodenalis assemblage A [63,77] and assemblage B [78] genomes have demonstrated low phylogenetic resolution at the gdh, bg, and tpi loci. These results evidenced the limitations of current MLST schemes and highlighted the necessity of identifying new markers for accurate and robust molecular typing.
The main strengths of this study include a relatively elevated sample size from an endemic area where little epidemiological information was previously available, and the adoption of a classical MLST scheme to assess the molecular diversity within G. duodenalis. However, some limitations might have biased the results obtained and the conclusions reached. First, G. duodenalis typing and sub-typing analyses were conducted on microscopy-positive samples only. It is likely that performing PCR and Sanger sequencing in all samples would have yielded different frequencies and diversities of G. duodenalis assemblages/sub-assemblages. Second, our MLST approach was based on single-copy markers. Adopting more sensitive MLST schemes can results on the assignation of different genetic variants. Third, interviewed children might have provided inaccurate answers to some of the questions included in the epidemiological questionnaire, potentially biasing the results of our statistical analyses. Fourth, epidemiological and molecular data generated in the present study is restricted to the age group and geographical area investigated, and might not be representative of the entire population in Nigeria. And fifth, initial detection of intestinal parasites was based on microscopy examination of single stool samples. Because of the limited diagnostic sensitivity of this method and the irregular shedding of the parasite’s transmission stages (eggs, cysts, oocysts, spores) in stools from infected patients, reported prevalence rates might represent an underestimation of the true ones.

5. Conclusions

Our results indicate that G. duodenalis is a common finding in apparently healthy school children in Ibadan, Nigeria. This study provides the most comprehensive and thorough account on the molecular diversity of G. duodenalis in this country. As in other sub-Saharan African regions, assemblage B is the predominant genetic variant of the parasite circulating in humans. This fact, together with the absence of animal-adapted assemblages in the surveyed pediatric population, strongly suggests that human transmission of G. duodenalis is primarily anthroponotic. Therefore, efforts to control giardiasis (and other fecal-orally transmitted pathogens) should focus on providing safe drinking water and improving sanitation and personal hygiene practices including hand washing.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/tropicalmed8030152/s1, Table S1: Oligonucleotides used for the molecular identification and characterization of Giardia duodenalis in the present study; Table S2: PCR cycling conditions used for the molecular identification and/or characterization of the microeukaryotic parasites investigated in the present study; Table S3: Full dataset showing the epidemiological, clinical, diagnostic, and molecular data generated in the present study; Table S4: Frequency and molecular diversity of G. duodenalis identified at the ssu locus in the school children population investigated in the present study. GenBank accession numbers are provided; Table S5: Frequency and molecular diversity of G. duodenalis identified at the gdh locus in the school children population investigated in the present study. GenBank accession numbers are provided; Table S6: Frequency and molecular diversity of G. duodenalis identified at the bg locus in the school children population investigated in the present study. GenBank accession numbers are provided; Table S7: Frequency and molecular diversity of G. duodenalis identified at the tpi locus in the school children population investigated in the present study. GenBank accession numbers are provided; Table S8: Input predictor values for the TwoStep Cluster Analysis, with positivity to Giardia duodenalis as evaluation variable.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K.T. and D.C.; methodology, M.K.T., I.G.-P., I.S.G., E.A., A.A., D.G.-B. and D.C.; software, P.C.K. and I.G.-P.; validation, M.K.T., D.G.-B. and D.C.; formal analysis, M.K.T., P.C.K. and D.C.; investigation, M.K.T., P.C.K., I.G.-P., I.S.G., E.A., A.A., A.D. and B.B.; resources, M.K.T. and D.C.; data curation, M.K.T., D.G.-B. and D.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.K.T., P.C.K., I.G.-P. and D.C.; writing—review and editing, M.K.T., P.C.K., I.G.-P., D.G.-B. and D.C.; visualization, M.K.T.; supervision, M.K.T. and D.C.; project administration, M.K.T. and D.C.; funding acquisition, M.K.T. and D.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Health Institute Carlos III (ISCIII), Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, grant number PI19CIII/00029.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Oyo State Ministry Health Research Ethics Review Committee (protocol code AD/13/479/537). To protect the privacy of the participants and their information from unauthorized access, samples and epidemiological questionnaires were anonymized by assigning them a numeric code. Only the principal investigator of the research project (M.K.T.) had access to this sensitive information.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the article and its Supplementary Materials. The sequences data were submitted to the GenBank database under the accession numbers OP946920–OP946928 (ssu rRNA locus), OP947099–OP947117 (gdh locus), OP947118–OP947130 (bg locus), and OP947131–OP947138 (tpi locus).

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our deep gratitude to all the children that participated in this study and their parents/guardians. We also thank the head teachers and teachers of all the schools that took part in the study. D.G.-B. is the recipient of a Sara Borrell Research Contract (CD19CIII/00011) funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities. A.D. is the recipient of a PFIS contract (FI20CIII/00002) funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and Universities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Kirk, M.D.; Pires, S.M.; Black, R.E.; Caipo, M.; Crump, J.A.; Devleesschauwer, B.; Döpfer, D.; Fazil, A.; Fischer-Walker, C.L.; Hald, T.; et al. World Health Organization estimates of the global and regional disease burden of 22 foodborne bacterial, protozoal, and viral diseases, 2010: A data synthesis. PLoS Med. 2015, 12, e1001921. [Google Scholar]
  2. Allain, T.; Buret, A.G. Pathogenesis and post-infectious complications in giardiasis. Adv. Parasitol. 2020, 107, 173–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hanevik, K.; Wensaas, K.-A.; Rortveit, G.; Eide, G.E.; Mørch, K.; Langeland, N. Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Chronic Fatigue 6 Years After Giardia Infection: A Controlled Prospective Cohort Study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014, 59, 1394–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Davids, B.J.; Liu, C.M.; Hanson, E.M.; Le, C.H.Y.; Ang, J.; Hanevik, K.; Fischer, M.; Radunovic, M.; Langeland, N.; Ferella, M.; et al. Identification of Conserved Candidate Vaccine Antigens in the Surface Proteome of Giardia lamblia. Infect. Immun. 2019, 87, e00219-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Mørch, K.; Hanevik, K. Giardiasis treatment: An update with a focus on refractory disease. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 33, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Dixon, B.R. Giardia duodenalis in humans and animals—Transmission and disease. Res. Veter Sci. 2021, 135, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Speich, B.; Croll, D.; Fürst, T.; Utzinger, J.; Keiser, J. Effect of sanitation and water treatment on intestinal protozoa infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Berkman, D.S.; Lescano, A.G.; Gilman, R.H.; Lopez, S.L.; Black, M.M. Effects of stunting, diarrhoeal disease, and parasitic infection during infancy on cognition in late childhood: A follow-up study. Lancet 2002, 359, 564–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ignatius, R.; Gahutu, J.B.; Klotz, C.; Steininger, C.; Shyirambere, C.; Lyng, M.; Musemakweri, A.; Aebischer, T.; Martus, P.; Harms, G.; et al. High Prevalence of Giardia duodenalis Assemblage B Infection and Association with Underweight in Rwandan Children. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012, 6, e1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kotloff, K.L.; Nataro, J.P.; Blackwelder, W.C.; Nasrin, D.; Farag, T.H.; Panchalingam, S.; Wu, Y.; Sow, S.O.; Sur, D.; Breiman, R.F.; et al. Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in infants and young children in developing countries (the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, GEMS): A prospective, case-control study. Lancet 2013, 382, 209–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Platts-Mills, J.A.; Babji, S.; Bodhidatta, L.; Gratz, J.; Haque, R.; Havt, A.; McCormick, B.J.; McGrath, M.; Olortegui, M.P.; Samie, A.; et al. Pathogen-specific burdens of community diarrhoea in developing countries: A multisite birth cohort study (MAL-ED). Lancet Glob. Health 2015, 3, e564–e575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Donowitz, J.R.; Alam, M.; Kabir, M.; Ma, J.Z.; Nazib, F.; Platts-Mills, J.A.; Bartelt, L.A.; Haque, R.; Petri, W.A. A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort to Investigate the Effects of Early Life Giardiasis on Growth and All Cause Diarrhea. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 63, 792–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Bartelt, L.A.; Platts-Mills, J.A. Giardia: A pathogen or commensal for children in high-prevalence settings? Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 29, 502–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Veenemans, J.; Mank, T.; Ottenhof, M.; Baidjoe, A.; Mbugi, E.V.; Demir, A.Y.; Wielders, J.P.M.; Savelkoul, H.F.J.; Verhoef, H. Protection against Diarrhea Associated with Giardia intestinalis Is Lost with Multi-Nutrient Supplementation: A Study in Tanzanian Children. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2011, 5, e1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ianiro, G.; Iorio, A.; Porcari, S.; Masucci, L.; Sanguinetti, M.; Perno, C.F.; Gasbarrini, A.; Putignani, L.; Cammarota, G. How the gut parasitome affects human health. Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol. 2022, 15, 17562848221091524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Soto-Méndez, M.J.; Aguilera, C.M.; Mesa, M.D.; Campaña-Martín, L.; Martín-Laguna, V.; Solomons, N.W.; Schümann, K.; Gil, Á. Interaction of Giardia intestinalis and Systemic Oxidation in Preschool Children in the Western Highlands of Guatemala. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2016, 63, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Reynoso-Robles, R.; Ponce-Macotela, M.; Rosas-López, L.E.; Ramos-Morales, A.; Martínez-Gordillo, M.N.; González-Maciel, A. The invasive potential of Giardia intestinalis in an in vivo model. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ryan, U.M.; Feng, Y.; Fayer, R.; Xiao, L. Taxonomy and molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium and Giardia—A 50 year perspective (1971–2021). Int. J. Parasitol. 2021, 51, 1099–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Squire, S.A.; Ryan, U. Cryptosporidium and Giardia in Africa: Current and future challenges. Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Haque, R.; Mondal, D.; Karim, A.; Molla, I.H.; Rahim, A.; Faruque, A.S.G.; Ahmad, N.; Kirkpatrick, B.D.; Houpt, E.; Snider, C.; et al. Prospective Case-Control Study of the Association between Common Enteric Protozoal Parasites and Diarrhea in Bangladesh. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 48, 1191–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Messa, A., Jr.; Köster, P.C.; Garrine, M.; Gilchrist, C.; Bartelt, L.A.; Nhampossa, T.; Massora, S.; Kotloff, K.; Levine, M.M.; Alonso, P.L.; et al. Molecular diversity of Giardia duodenalis in children under 5 years from the Manhiça district, Southern Mozambique enrolled in a matched case-control study on the aetiology of diarrhoea. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021, 15, e0008987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Vos, T.; Lim, S.S.; Abbafati, C.; Abbas, K.M.; Abbasi, M.; Abbasifard, M. GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020, 396, 1204–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Enekwechi, L.C.; Azubike, C.N. Survey of the prevalence of intestinal parasites in children of primary school age. W. Afr. J. Med. 1994, 13, 227–230. [Google Scholar]
  24. Edosomwan, E.U.; Evbuomwan, I.O.; Agbalalah, C.; Dahunsi, S.O.; Abhulimhen-Iyoha, B.I. Malaria coinfection with Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) in children at Internally Displaced Persons (IDP) camp in Benin City, Nigeria. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ihejirika, O.C.; Nwaorgu, O.C.; Ebirim, C.I.; Nwokeji, C.M. Effects of intestinal parasitic infections on nutritional status of primary children in Imo State Nigeria. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2019, 33, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gyang, V.P.; Chuang, T.-W.; Liao, C.-W.; Lee, Y.-L.; Akinwale, O.P.; Orok, A.; Ajibaye, O.; Babasola, A.J.; Cheng, P.-C.; Chou, C.-M.; et al. Intestinal parasitic infections: Current status and associated risk factors among school aged children in an archetypal African urban slum in Nigeria. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2019, 52, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Arene, F.O.; Akabogu, O.A. Intestinal parasitic infections in pre-school children in the Niger Delta. J. Hyg. Epidemiol. Microbiol. Immunol. 1986, 30, 99–102. [Google Scholar]
  28. Efunshile, M.A.; Ngwu, B.A.F.; Kurtzhals, J.A.L.; Stensvold, C.R.; Sahar, S.; König, B. Molecular Detection of the Carriage Rate of Four Intestinal Protozoa with Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction: Possible Overdiagnosis of Entamoeba histolytica in Nigeria. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015, 93, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Efunshile, A.M.; Ezeanosike, O.; Onyekachi, O.N.I.; Ugwu, M.I.; König, B.; Robertson, L.J. Apparent absence of Giardia infections among children under 5-years of age with acute watery diarrhoea in Abakaliki, Nigeria. Epidemiol. Infect 2018, 147, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Tinuade, O.; John, O.; Saheed, O.; Oyeku, O.; Fidelis, N.; Olabisi, D. Parasitic etiology of childhood diarrhea. Indian J. Pediatr. 2006, 73, 1081–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ogunsanya, T.I.; Rotimi, V.O.; Adenuga, A.; Birkholz, S.; Knipp, U.; Lemma, E.; Kroger, A.; Opferkuch, W. A study of the aetiological agents of childhood diarrhoea in Lagos, Nigeria. J. Med. Microbiol. 1994, 40, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Yakubu, A.M.; Sathiakumar, N. Chronic diarrhoea in Nigerian children. J. Diarrhoeal Dis. Res. 1985, 3, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Akinbo, F.O.; Okaka, C.E.; Omoregie, R. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections among HIV patients in Benin City, Nigeria. Libyan J. Med. 2010, 5, 5506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Sanyaolu, A.O.; Oyibo, W.A.; Fagbenro-Beyioku, A.F.; Gbadegeshin, A.H.; Iriemenam, N.C. Comparative study of entero-parasitic infections among HIV sero-positive and sero-negative patients in Lagos, Nigeria. Acta Trop. 2011, 120, 268–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Keshinro, I.B.; Musa, B.O. Cellular immunity and diarrhoeal disease amongst patients infected with the human immunodeficiency viruses 1 and 2 in Zaria, Nigeria. Niger. J. Med. 2003, 12, 22–26. [Google Scholar]
  36. Nzeako, B.C. Seasonal prevalence of protozoan parasites in Nsukka, Nigeria. J. Commun. Dis. 1992, 24, 224–230. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ogunba, E.O. The prevalence of human intestinal protozoa in Ibadan, Nigeria. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1977, 80, 187–191. [Google Scholar]
  38. Maikai, B.V.; Umoh, J.U.; Lawal, I.A.; Kudi, A.C.; Ejembi, C.L.; Xiao, L. Molecular characterizations of Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and Enterocytozoon in humans in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Exp. Parasitol. 2012, 131, 452–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Reinthaler, F.F.; Mascher, F.; Klem, G.; Sixl, W. A survey of gastrointestinal parasites in Ogun State, southwest Nigeria. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 1988, 82, 181–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Idowu, O.A.; Rowland, S.A. Oral fecal parasites and personal hygiene of food handlers in Abeokuta, Nigeria. Afr. Health Sci. 2006, 6, 160–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ogunji, F.O.; Akinboade, O.A.; Dipeolu, O.O.; Ayeni, J.; Okaeme, A. The prevalence of gastro-intestinal parasites and bacteria in the game scouts at the Kainji Lake National Park of Nigeria. Int. J. Zoonoses 1984, 11, 119–122. [Google Scholar]
  42. Okafor, C.N.; Azubike, C.N. Studies in intestinal parasitic disease agents in stools of people in a rural area of Nigeria. West Afr. J. Med. 1992, 11, 106–111. [Google Scholar]
  43. Okpasuo, O.J.; Aguzie, I.O.; Joy, A.T.; Okafor, F.C. Risk assessment of waterborne infections in Enugu State, Nigeria: Implications of household water choices, knowledge, and practices. AIMS Public Health 2020, 7, 634–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ikeh, E.I.; Obadofin, M.O.; Brindeiro, B.; Baugherb, C.; Frost, F.; Vanderjagt, D.; Glew, R.H. Intestinal parasitism in Magama Gumau rural village and Jos township in north central Nigeria. Niger. Postgrad. Med. J. 2007, 14, 290–295. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Oyerinde, J.P.; Ogunbi, O.; Alonge, A.A. Age and sex distribution of infections with Entamoeba histolytica and Giardia intestinalis in the Lagos population. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1977, 6, 231–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Akinkuotu, O.A.; Takeet, M.I.; Otesile, E.B.; Olufemi, F.; Greenwood, S.J.; McClure, J.T. Multi-locus genotyping and phylogenetic analyses of Giardia intestinalis isolates from indigenous goats in Ogun State, Nigeria. Acta Trop. 2019, 195, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Akinkuotu, O.A.; Takeet, M.I.; Otesile, E.B.; Olufemi, F.; Greenwood, S.J.; McClure, J.T. Prevalence and multilocus genotypes of Giardia duodenalis infecting pigs in Ogun state, Nigeria. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2019, 70, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Akinkuotu, O.A.; Greenwood, S.J.; McClure, J.T.; Takeet, M.I.; Otesile, E.B.; Olufemi, F. Multilocus genotyping of Giardia duodenalis infecting rabbits in Ogun State, Nigeria. Veter Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2018, 13, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Adenusi, A.A.; Akinyemi, M.I.; Akinsanya, D. Domiciliary Cockroaches as Carriers of Human Intestinal Parasites in Lagos Metropolis, Southwest Nigeria: Implications for Public Health. J. Arthropod-Borne Dis. 2018, 12, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Adenusi, A.A.; Adewoga, T.O.S. Human intestinal parasites in non-biting synanthropic flies in Ogun State, Nigeria. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2013, 11, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cheesbrough, M. District Laboratory Practice in Tropical Countries. Part 1, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  52. Verweij, J.J.; Schinkel, J.; Laeijendecker, D.; van Rooyen, M.A.; van Lieshout, L.; Polderman, A.M. Real-time PCR for the detection of Giardia lamblia. Mol. Cell. Probes 2003, 17, 223–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Appelbee, A.; Frederick, L.; Heitman, T.; Olson, M. Prevalence and genotyping of Giardia duodenalis from beef calves in Alberta, Canada. Veter Parasitol. 2003, 112, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hopkins, R.M.; Meloni, B.P.; Groth, D.M.; Wetherall, J.D.; Reynoldson, J.A.; Thompson, R.C.A. Ribosomal RNA Sequencing Reveals Differences between the Genotypes of Giardia Isolates Recovered from Humans and Dogs Living in the Same Locality. J. Parasitol. 1997, 83, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Read, C.M.; Monis, P.T.; Thompson, R.C. Discrimination of all genotypes of Giardia duodenalis at the glutamate dehydrogenase locus using PCR-RFLP. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2004, 4, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lalle, M.; Pozio, E.; Capelli, G.; Bruschi, F.; Crotti, D.; Cacciò, S.M. Genetic heterogeneity at the beta-giardin locus among human and animal isolates of Giardia duodenalis and identification of potentially zoonotic subgenotypes. Int. J. Parasitol. 2005, 35, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sulaiman, I.M.; Fayer, R.; Bern, C.; Gilman, R.H.; Trout, J.M.; Schantz, P.M.; Das, P.; Lal, A.A.; Xiao, L. Triosephosphate Isomerase Gene Characterization and Potential Zoonotic Transmission of Giardia duodenalis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2003, 9, 1444–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0; IBM Corp.: Armonk, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  60. Schuurman, T.; Lankamp, P.; van Belkum, A.; Kooistra-Smid, M.; van Zwet, A. Comparison of microscopy, real-time PCR and a rapid immunoassay for the detection of Giardia lamblia in human stool specimens. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2007, 13, 1186–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Popruk, S.; Thima, K.; Udonsom, R.; Rattaprasert, P.; Sukthana, Y. Does silent Giardia infection need any attention? Open Trop. Med. J. 2011, 4, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Reh, L.; Muadica, A.S.; Köster, P.C.; Balasegaram, S.; Verlander, N.Q.; Chércoles, E.R.; Carmena, D. Substantial prevalence of enteroparasites Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis and Blastocystis sp. in asymptomatic schoolchildren in Madrid, Spain, November 2017 to June 2018. Eurosurveillance 2019, 24, 1900241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Ankarklev, J.; Lebbad, M.; Einarsson, E.; Franzén, O.; Ahola, H.; Troell, K.; Svärd, S.G. A novel high-resolution multilocus sequence typing of Giardia intestinalis Assemblage A isolates reveals zoonotic transmission, clonal outbreaks and recombination. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2018, 60, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Dacal, E.; Saugar, J.M.; de Lucio, A.; Hernández-De-Mingo, M.; Robinson, E.; Köster, P.C.; Aznar-Ruiz-De-Alegría, M.L.; Espasa, M.; Ninda, A.; Gandasegui, J.; et al. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Strongyloides stercoralis, Giardia duodenalis, Cryptosporidium spp., and Blastocystis spp. isolates in school children in Cubal, Western Angola. Parasites Vectors 2018, 11, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. de Lucio, A.; Amor-Aramendía, A.; Bailo, B.; Saugar, J.M.; Anegagrie, M.; Arroyo, A.; López-Quintana, B.; Zewdie, D.; Ayehubizu, Z.; Yizengaw, E.; et al. Prevalence and Genetic Diversity of Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. among School Children in a Rural Area of the Amhara Region, North-West Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0159992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Di Cristanziano, V.; Santoro, M.; Parisi, F.; Albonico, M.; Shaali, M.; Di Cave, D.; Berrilli, F. Genetic characterization of Giardia duodenalis by sequence analysis in humans and animals in Pemba Island, Tanzania. Parasitol. Int. 2014, 63, 438–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Tembo, S.J.; Mutengo, M.M.; Sitali, L.; Changula, K.; Takada, A.; Mweene, A.S.; Simulundu, E.; Chitanga, S. Prevalence and genotypic characterization of Giardia duodenalis isolates from asymptomatic school-going children in Lusaka, Zambia. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2020, 19, e00072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cai, W.; Ryan, U.; Xiao, L.; Feng, Y. Zoonotic giardiasis: An update. Parasitol. Res. 2021, 120, 4199–4218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Figueiredo Pacheco, F.T.; Novaes Rodrigues Silva, R.K.; Souza de Carvalho, S.; Carvalho Rocha, F.; Trindade das Chagas, G.M.; Chagas Gomes, D.; da Costa-Ribeiro, H., Jr.; Medrado Ribeiro, T.C.; Peixoto de Mattos, Â.; Kalabric Silva, L.; et al. The Predominance of Giardia duodenalis AII sub-assemblage in young children from Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Biomedica 2020, 40, 557–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Skhal, D.; Aboualchamat, G.; Al Mariri, A.; Al Nahhas, S. Prevalence of Giardia duodenalis assemblages and sub-assemblages in symptomatic patients from Damascus city and its suburbs. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2017, 47, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cacciò, S.; Beck, R.; Lalle, M.; Marinculic, A.; Pozio, E. Multilocus genotyping of Giardia duodenalis reveals striking differences between assemblages A and B. Int. J. Parasitol. 2008, 38, 1523–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sprong, H.; Cacciò, S.M.; van der Giessen, J.W.B.; on behalf of the ZOOPNET Network and Partners. Identification of Zoonotic Genotypes of Giardia duodenalis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2009, 3, e558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Köster, P.C.; Malheiros, A.F.; Shaw, J.J.; Balasegaram, S.; Prendergast, A.; Lucaccioni, H.; Moreira, L.M.; Lemos, L.M.S.; Dashti, A.; Bailo, B.; et al. Multilocus genotyping of Giardia duodenalis in mostly asymptomatic indigenous people from the Tapirapé tribe, Brazilian Amazon. Pathogens 2021, 10, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Sarzhanov, F.; Köster, P.C.; Dogruman-Al, F.; Bailo, B.; Dashti, A.; Demirel-Kaya, F.; Carmena, D. Detection of enteric parasites and molecular characterization of Giardia duodenalis and Blastocystis sp. in patients admitted to hospital in Ankara, Turkey. Parasitology 2021, 148, 550–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Morrison, H.G.; McArthur, A.G.; Gillin, F.D.; Aley, S.B.; Adam, R.D.; Olsen, G.J.; Best, A.A.; Cande, W.Z.; Chen, F.; Cipriano, M.J.; et al. Genomic Minimalism in the Early Diverging Intestinal Parasite Giardia lamblia. Science 2007, 317, 1921–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Franzén, O.; Jerlström-Hultqvist, J.; Castro, E.; Sherwood, E.; Ankarklev, J.; Reiner, D.S.; Palm, D.; Andersson, J.O.; Andersson, B.; Svärd, S.G. Draft genome sequencing of Giardia intestinalis assemblage B isolate GS: Is human giardiasis caused by two different species? PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5, e1000560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Seabolt, M.H.; Roellig, D.M.; Konstantinidis, K.T. Genomic comparisons confirm Giardia duodenalis sub-assemblage AII as a unique species. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 1010244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Seabolt, M.H.; Konstantinidis, K.T.; Roellig, D.M. Hidden Diversity within Common Protozoan Parasites as Revealed by a Novel Genomotyping Scheme. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e02275-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Median-joining haplotype networks built in PoPArt software using gdh (A), bg (B), and tpi (C) sequences generated in the present study. Haplotypes are represented by circles proportional to relative haplotypes abundance; different colors indicate different sampling areas. Hatch marks refer to the mutational steps between haplotypes. Black circles represent hypothetical missing haplotypes predicted.
Figure 1. Median-joining haplotype networks built in PoPArt software using gdh (A), bg (B), and tpi (C) sequences generated in the present study. Haplotypes are represented by circles proportional to relative haplotypes abundance; different colors indicate different sampling areas. Hatch marks refer to the mutational steps between haplotypes. Black circles represent hypothetical missing haplotypes predicted.
Tropicalmed 08 00152 g001
Table 1. Occurrence and genetic diversity of Giardia duodenalis in human and animal hosts in Nigeria, 1994–2022.
Table 1. Occurrence and genetic diversity of Giardia duodenalis in human and animal hosts in Nigeria, 1994–2022.
Host PopulationCity/RegionDetection MethodSamples
Analyzed (n)
Infection
Rate (%)
Assemblage (n)Reference
Human
Asymptomatic childrenAnambra StateCM15360.1ND[23]
Asymptomatic childrenBenin CityCM18459.8ND[24]
Asymptomatic childrenImo StateCM3002.7ND[25]
Asymptomatic childrenLagos CityCM38412.2ND[26]
Asymptomatic childrenNiger DeltaCM10629.2ND[27]
Asymptomatic childrenOyo StatePCR, DFA19937.2ND[28]
Diarrheic childrenEbonyi StatePCR, DFA1990.0[29]
Diarrheic childrenIlesa CityCM3007.1ND[30]
Diarrheic childrenLagos CityCM2150.5ND[31]
Diarrheic childrenZaria CityCM14226.1ND[32]
HIV+ patientsBenin CityCM20000.6ND[33]
HIV+ patientsLagos CityCM659.2ND[34]
HIV+ patientsZaria CityCM1025.0ND[35]
Hospital outpatientsEnugu StateCM50047.8ND[36]
Hospital outpatientsIbadan CityCM360,0001.6ND[37]
Hospital outpatientsKaduna StatePCR-RFLP1573.2A (5)[38]
Hospital outpatientsLagos CityCM10150.6ND[34]
Hospital outpatientsOgun StateCM4794.2ND[39]
Food handlersOgun StateCM10013.0ND[40]
Game scoutsKainji Lake National ParkCM20NSND[41]
Rural dwellersPlateau StateCM3002.3ND[42]
Urban dwellersEnugu StateCM40335.2ND[43]
Urban dwellers Jos CityCM1114.3–7.2ND[44]
Urban dwellersLagos CityCM20997.9ND[45]
Livestock
GoatOgun StateELISA, PCR30245.7A (5), B (13), E (40)[46]
PigOgun StateELISA, PCR20925.4B (4), E (37), B + E (2)[47]
RabbitOgun StatePCR8372.3B (19)[48]
Insects
CockroachLagos StateCM74918.7ND[49]
FlyOgun StateCM71903.3ND[50]
CM: conventional microscopy; DFA: direct fluorescence assay; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; ND: not determined; NS: not specified; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; PCR-RFLP: polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism.
Table 2. Detection of intestinal parasites by microscopy examination.
Table 2. Detection of intestinal parasites by microscopy examination.
Parasite SpeciesPositive (n)Frequency (%) 1
None21368.5
In monoinfection
G. duodenalis3711.9
Entamoeba complex72.3
In coinfection
G. duodenalis + A. lumbricoides20.6
G. duodenalis + Entamoeba complex4915.8
G. duodenalis + Taenia sp.10.3
G. duodenalis + A. lumbricoides + Entamoeba complex20.6
Total311100
1 Over the total of fecal samples (n = 311) examined. Entamoeba complex: Entamoeba histolytica/dispar/moshkovskii.
Table 3. Multilocus sequence typing results of the 60 G. duodenalis-positive samples of pediatric origin successfully genotyped at any of the four loci investigated in the present survey. The age and gender of the infected children are also shown.
Table 3. Multilocus sequence typing results of the 60 G. duodenalis-positive samples of pediatric origin successfully genotyped at any of the four loci investigated in the present survey. The age and gender of the infected children are also shown.
Sample IDAge (Years)GenderCT Value in qPCRssu rRNAgdhbgtpiAssigned Genotype
28M25.5BB
49F29.4BB
512F27.8BBIIIBIII
611FBB
910M23.6BBIIIBIII
119F32.6BB
1312M27.9BBIIIBIII
157M30.3BIIIBIII
1711F25.8BB
256M34.8BB
275F31.5BB
287M31.5BB
298F32.7BB
308M38.6BB
317M21.8BBIII/BIVBBIII/BIV
3210MAA
339M21.2AAIIAIIAII
3412F30.6BBIIIBIII
3610M23.6BBB
3711F25.7AA
3910F22.2AAIIAIIAII
4110M20.0BB
447M24.9BAIIAII + B
465F31.2BBIIIBIII
477F24.7BBIIIBBIII
4915M29.8BB
508M24.7AAIIAIIAII
515M27.8BBIIIBIII
529F21.2AAIIAIIAIIAII
5310F23.7AAIIAIIIAII/AIII
5410F23.1AAIIAIIIAII/AIII
558F23.1AAIIAIIIAII/AIII
5614F35.8AA
5811F36.3AA
5912F24.4BBIII/BIVBBIIIBIII/BIV
6110F24.1BBIII/BIVBBIII/BIV
6312F31.4BBIVBIV
6813M26.8BBIIIBBIIIBIII
7011M27.3AAIIAIIAII
7711F34.3AA
7811M24.9AAIIAIIAIIAII
7912M33.6BB
8014F34.6BB
815M33.3AA
8210M22.3BBIIIBIII
8313F31.0BB
849M26.7BBIII/BIVBBIIIBIII/BIV
8514F23.2BBBIIIBIII
886F22.0BBIVBIII/BIVBIII/BIV
8910M23.0BBIII/BIVBBIIIBIII/BIV
918F22.5AAIIAIIAIIAII
927F32.6BBB
947F36.3BB
959F28.3BB
9611F29.9BB
9710F32.5BBIIIAIIAII + BIII
9810M30.6BB
993M30.2BB
10010M29.1BB
1029F24.7AAIIIAIII
Table 4. Haplotypes distribution for gdh, bg, and tpi sequences.
Table 4. Haplotypes distribution for gdh, bg, and tpi sequences.
MarkerSequences (n)Sites (n)Monomorphic Sites (n)Segregating Sites (n)Segregating Sites with >2 Variants (n)Positions with
Gaps (n)
Positions with Missing Data (n)Variable Sites (n)Haplotypes (n)Haplotype Diversity
gdh3843323863151320180260.9815
bg2663738853101960240190.9785
tpi16531299108271240208150.9917
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tijani, M.K.; Köster, P.C.; Guadano-Procesi, I.; George, I.S.; Abodunrin, E.; Adeola, A.; Dashti, A.; Bailo, B.; González-Barrio, D.; Carmena, D. High Diversity of Giardia duodenalis Assemblages and Sub-Assemblages in Asymptomatic School Children in Ibadan, Nigeria. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8, 152. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8030152

AMA Style

Tijani MK, Köster PC, Guadano-Procesi I, George IS, Abodunrin E, Adeola A, Dashti A, Bailo B, González-Barrio D, Carmena D. High Diversity of Giardia duodenalis Assemblages and Sub-Assemblages in Asymptomatic School Children in Ibadan, Nigeria. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2023; 8(3):152. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8030152

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tijani, Muyideen K., Pamela C. Köster, Isabel Guadano-Procesi, Imo S. George, Elizabeth Abodunrin, Adedamola Adeola, Alejandro Dashti, Begoña Bailo, David González-Barrio, and David Carmena. 2023. "High Diversity of Giardia duodenalis Assemblages and Sub-Assemblages in Asymptomatic School Children in Ibadan, Nigeria" Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 8, no. 3: 152. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8030152

APA Style

Tijani, M. K., Köster, P. C., Guadano-Procesi, I., George, I. S., Abodunrin, E., Adeola, A., Dashti, A., Bailo, B., González-Barrio, D., & Carmena, D. (2023). High Diversity of Giardia duodenalis Assemblages and Sub-Assemblages in Asymptomatic School Children in Ibadan, Nigeria. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, 8(3), 152. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8030152

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop