Next Article in Journal
Impact of Nutritional Counselling and Support on Body Mass Index Recovery and Treatment Outcomes Among Tuberculosis Patients in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic
Previous Article in Journal
Is Ghana Prepared for Another Arboviral Outbreak? Evaluating the 2024 Dengue Fever Outbreak in the Context of Past Yellow Fever, Influenza, and COVID-19 Outbreaks
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Epidemiological Profile and Risk Factors for Malaria in Rural Communities Before the Operationalization of the Singrobo–Ahouaty Dam, Southern Côte d’Ivoire

by
Taki Jean Deles Avenié
1,2,3,4,*,
Kigbafori Dieudonné Silué
2,3,
Négnorogo Guindo-Coulibaly
2,
Naférima Koné
2,
Sadikou Touré
3,
Kouamé Laurent Valian
5,
Kouassi Séraphin Kouadio
2,
Alloua Marie Joelle Bédia
2,
Boza Fulgence Déabo
2,
Klotcholman Diabagaté
2,3,
Christian Nsanzabana
1,4 and
Jean Tenena Coulibaly
2,3
1
Department of Medicine, University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, CH-4003 Basel, Switzerland
2
Unité de Recherche et de Formation Bioscience, Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny, Abidjan 22 BP 770, Côte d’Ivoire
3
Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d’Ivoire, Abidjan 01 BP 1303, Côte d’Ivoire
4
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, CH-4123 Allschwil, Switzerland
5
Centre de Santé Urbain de Irobo, Jacqueville BP 201, Côte d’Ivoire
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2025, 10(7), 197; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed10070197
Submission received: 2 May 2025 / Revised: 3 June 2025 / Accepted: 5 June 2025 / Published: 15 July 2025

Abstract

Malaria remains a major public health issue, especially near hydroelectric dams that often promote mosquito breeding. This study aimed to establish baseline epidemiological data during the construction of the Singrobo–Ahouaty dam to support assessment and decision-making for short- and long-term health impacts on surrounding communities. A cross-sectional survey was carried out in randomly selected households. Blood samples were analyzed using thick/thin smears and rapid diagnostic tests, while sociodemographic and behavioral data were collected via questionnaires. Statistical analyses included chi-square, Mann–Whitney, Kruskal–Wallis tests, and logistic regression. The malaria prevalence was 43.1% (394/915). The parasite density averaged 405.7 parasites/µL. School-age children (6–13 years) showed the highest prevalence (74.3%, p < 0.0001), while younger children (0–5 years) had the highest parasite density (1218.0 parasites/µL, p < 0.0001). Highly elevated infection rates (>51%) occurred in Sokrogbo, N’Dènou, and Amani-Menou, with the highest density in Ahérémou 1 (5663.9 parasites/µL). Risk factors included being an informal worker (ORa = 1.5), working in the raw material sector (ORa = 1.4) or market gardening/rice farming (ORa = 0.9; p = 0.043), and frequent mosquito bites (OR = 0.4; p = 0.017). These results underscore the need for stronger vector control strategies, improved bed net distribution and follow-up, and enhanced intersectoral collaboration in dam-influenced areas to reduce malaria transmission.

1. Background

Malaria remains a parasitic disease that continues to pose a significant public health threat worldwide, with the highest burden observed in sub-Saharan Africa [1,2,3,4]. The countries most affected are generally developing or low-income countries. In 2023, the estimated number of new malaria cases reached 263 million across 83 countries, with approximately 597,000 deaths attributed to the disease [2]. The African region of the World Health Organization (WHO) bears the highest malaria burden, accounting for 94% of global cases (over 247 million cases) and 95% of global malaria-related deaths (over 567,000 deaths) [2]. The highest mortality rates occur among children under five years of age [3,4]. Therefore, prompt and effective malaria treatment is particularly crucial for this age group. Malaria control efforts have primarily targeted children, as they represent the majority of reported cases [3,4] and remain the main target for control measures and research initiatives in areas of stable malaria transmission in sub-Saharan Africa [5]. In malaria-endemic regions, young children face a higher risk of progression to severe disease compared to adults [6]. They more frequently present with altered consciousness, respiratory distress, multiple seizures, severe anemia, hypoglycemia, acidosis, hyperlactatemia, and hyperparasitemia [6].
This disease remains one of the most widespread parasitic diseases in Côte d’Ivoire, significantly impacting public health and socioeconomic development [7,8]. In Côte d’Ivoire, malaria endemicity and epidemiology are closely linked to factors influencing the proliferation of Anopheles mosquito populations. These factors include rainfall, temperature, vegetation cover, and human activities that affect the environment [9,10,11,12]. P. falciparum remains the predominant species, accounting for more than 95% of malaria cases. However, other Plasmodium species, including P. malariae, P. ovale, and P. vivax, are also present in Côte d’Ivoire, responsible for less than 5% of malaria cases [13,14]. Despite ongoing control efforts by the government and its partners, malaria remains the deadliest endemic parasitic disease in the country [15]. In addition, there have been periods of high malaria transmission, with elevated prevalence rates, as observed in the Taabo department (the site of the present study), where malaria prevalence reached 46.0% in 2010 and 56.6% in 2011 [16]. This region is, therefore, a high-transmission area where a second hydroelectric dam, the Singrobo–Ahouaty dam, is currently under construction.
Hydroelectric infrastructure is vital in promoting irrigated agriculture, achieving food self-sufficiency, and fostering economic development in the West African region. The drive towards introducing this infrastructure has led several countries, including Côte d’Ivoire, to construct multiple hydroelectric dams [1]. Within this framework, Côte d’Ivoire has initiated the construction of the Singrobo–Ahouaty hydroelectric dam, with a capacity of 44 megawatts (MW). This dam is currently being built on the Bandama River in the Taabo district, specifically between the villages of Singrobo and Ahouaty, downstream of the Taabo dam [17].
Although hydroelectric dams provide socioeconomic and energy benefits, their environmental impacts can promote the spread of vector-borne diseases, including malaria, through the alteration of aquatic and environmental ecosystems. Moreover, the health aspect is often neglected in major water resource development projects [1,7,18]. Indeed, the construction of the Singrobo–Ahouaty dam could alter the local ecosystem and influence malaria transmission in the region. Hydroelectric dams have a major impact on the transmission of vector-borne diseases such as malaria, making them a public health issue [7,18,19,20]. Increased malaria transmission has been reported in Africa around several hydroelectric schemes [8,21,22]. Additionally, the socioenvironmental context around the dam is complex, characterized by demographic changes, environmental transformations, and population migratory movements associated with dam construction [17]. These factors can affect malaria transmission dynamics by altering mosquito vector habitats, water resource availability, and the living conditions of local populations.
However, there is a general lack of epidemiological data, particularly entomological data, in the study area, which is nevertheless recognized as a region with high malaria transmission [16]. In the context of the environmental changes induced by the construction of the Singrobo–Ahouaty dam, it is essential to collect both epidemiological and entomological data as well as malaria-related risk factors. This will serve as a basis for the short-, medium- and long-term assessments of the dam’s impacts on malaria transmission and the health of surrounding communities. The main objective of this study is to set up baseline epidemiological data on malaria transmission dynamics during the construction phase of the dam. A better understanding of this aspect is essential for decision-making and for the design and implementation of malaria prevention and control measures tailored to the specific needs of local communities. This could help reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with this parasitic disease in the context of water management.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study Area

A cross-sectional study was conducted in February 2021 across nine villages within the impact zone of the Singrobo–Ahouaty dam, which is currently under construction (Figure 1). These villages belong to the district of Taabo in the Agnéby–Tiassa region. The Taabo district (6°14′ North Latitude and 5°08′ West Longitude) is situated approximately 150 km from Abidjan, the economic capital of Côte d’Ivoire [16]. The Agnéby–Tiassa region is characterized by an extensive hydrographic network. The Bandama River, which hosts the Taabo hydroelectric dam, operational since the 1970s, serves as a crucial water resource. The resulting reservoir supports fishing activities, while the upstream area provides favorable conditions for food crop cultivation. The Singrobo–Ahouaty dam is being constructed downstream of the Taabo hydroelectric dam on the Bandama River. This water infrastructure project is led by Ivoire Hydro Energy (IHE), which aims to understand and monitor the transmission dynamics of water-related diseases during the dam’s construction phase. The villages included in the study were chosen based on their inclusion within the dam impact zone. Additionally, the Agnéby–Tiassa region, including the Taabo district, is recognized for its high malaria endemicity [16].
To this end, the Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d’Ivoire (CSRS) was commissioned to conduct this study within the dam’s impact zone. The selection of the study site was primarily driven by the ongoing construction of the Singrobo–Ahouaty dam. The region’s environmental conditions, including high humidity levels and extensive areas, create permanent reproduction sites for malaria vectors (Anopheles gambiae, An. Funestus, and An. nili) such as malaria parasites (P. falciparum, P. malariae, and P. ovale) [16]. These conditions are further exacerbated by the substantial annual rainfall, which reached 1398 and 1544 mm in 2020 and 2021, respectively, with an average of 1332 mm over the period 2012–2021. The average temperature of the study area was recorded at 26.2 °C in 2020 and 26.1 °C in 2021, with a mean of 26.1 °C over the same period (2012–2021, according to data from NASA POWER) (Figure 2).

2.2. Study Design

After obtaining ethical approval from Comité National d’Ethique des Sciences de la Vie et de la Santé en Côte d’Ivoire (CNESVS) (protocol code: 149-22/MSHPCMU/CNESVS-kp), local authorities, parents, and/or legal guardians of preschool and school-age children were informed about the objectives, procedures, risks, and benefits of the study. Community health workers (CHWs) received training from the research team on their role in conducting the study. This study was carried out through a cross-sectional parasitological survey. Capillary blood samples were collected in the nine villages within the impact zone of the Singrobo–Ahouaty dam to diagnose malaria using rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and mixed smears (thick drop and blood smear). The RDTs used were based on Histidine-Rich Protein 2 (HRP2). In each studied village, households were randomly selected using a geographic information system (GIS). This system, containing the geographical coordinates of the selected households, was then integrated into the Android application “OsmAnd–Maps & Navigation”, installed on the smartphones of all survey team members. A specific training session on the use of this system and the retrieval of household coordinates was provided to the entire team by its developer. Once in the field, households were located and identified using GIS-equipped smartphones. Upon arrival at a household, the researchers and the guide (fluent in the local language) explained the study objectives, procedures, risks, and benefits. Individuals who agreed to participate provided informed consent by signing a consent form (≥18 years), while minors (<18 years) provided assent before a capillary blood sample was collected from their fingertip. The RDTs and mixed smears were conducted on-site in the various households. The analysis of the RDTs and mixed smears helped identify the epidemiological profile of malaria in the study area. Additionally, questionnaires were administered to household heads in homes where malaria diagnoses were performed to assess the risk factors associated with malaria.
The questionnaires were developed and validated by the project’s investigators. Other academic researchers involved in the management of the project also validated the questions prior to conducting the interviews. Thus, all nine localities in the study area were investigated. The inclusion criteria were agreeing to participate by signing an informed consent form and/or assent if applicable, residing in one of the villages within the study area, agreeing to provide a capillary blood sample, and being asymptomatic. The non-inclusion criteria included lack of informed consent from the participant or parent/guardian for minors (under 18 years), presenting symptoms and/or signs of severe, chronic, or central nervous system infections, patients presenting signs of severe malaria, and confirmed or suspected pregnancy. Participation in this study was voluntary. The questionnaires were addressed to the household’s head and were designed to assess malaria-associated risk factors.

2.3. Sample Size Calculation

This study forms part of the health component of the Singrobo–Ahouaty Hydroelectric Development Project, which aims to tackle several water-borne diseases, including malaria. The number of households required for the implementation of the project to which this study is linked was estimated. For the purposes of this study, a household is defined as a group of individuals living under the same roof and sharing the same domestic economy. A 5% variation in indicators from one year to the next during the three-year dam construction period was considered significant. Assuming that 28% of households in the project area had an acceptable health status with regard to the targeted diseases, the objective was to increase this proportion by 15 percentage points each year, with the aim of achieving good health for 75% of households by the end of the three-year period. This estimate was made with a 95% confidence level and 80% statistical power. The number of households required to detect such a change was calculated as follows:
n = D [(Zα + Zβ)2 × (P1(1 − P1) + P2(1 − P2))/(P2 − P1)2]. So,
n = 2[(1.645 + 1.282)2 × (0.28(1 − 0.28) + 0.75(1 − 0.75))/(0.75 − 0.28)2] = 30 households/village,
where n = number of households, D = design effect, conditionally estimated at 2, P1 = estimated proportion of households in the project area with an acceptable health status, P2 = expected proportion of households with improved health status at the end of the project, Zα = Z-score corresponding to the confidence level required to conclude that a change has occurred and is not due to chance, and Zβ = Z-score corresponding to the confidence level required to detect the change if it actually occurs. Thus, 30 households per village were selected for study, making a total of 270 households across the nine villages within the impact zone of the Singrobo–Ahouaty dam project. However, for this malaria-specific study, 252 households were randomly selected with a proportional distribution according to the number of households in each village within the zone of influence of the Singrobo–Ahouaty dam. From each household, four individuals were selected: a parent (aged 18 or over, either the father or mother), an adolescent (aged 14–17), a school-age child (aged 6–13) and a preschool child (aged 5 or under). However, certain age groups, such as teenagers and school- or preschool-age children, were absent from several households. In addition, several cases of refusal were recorded at both the household level and among individuals within households.

2.4. Blood Sample Collection and Analysis

Finger prick blood samples and body temperatures were collected from the household’s members. Before the data and sample collection process, the study was explained to participants, and they signed an informed consent or assent form for minors (<18 years). Malaria diagnosis was performed using rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and thick and thin blood smears (TBSs). The TBSs were then prepared on microscopy slides and subsequently transported to the laboratory for adequate preparation and readings.
Procedures and Analysis of TDR (HRP2)
After disinfecting the participant’s fingertip with an alcohol swab, a sterile lancet was used to collect a drop of blood, which was then placed on the test cassette using a capillary loop. The participant’s finger was carefully disinfected again with an alcohol-soaked cotton pad. Subsequently, 2 to 3 drops of buffer solution were added according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the test was left to incubate for 10 to 15 min. The result was read visually: the presence of two lines indicated a positive test, a single control line signified a negative test, and the absence of a control line rendered the test invalid. Finally, all used materials were disposed of in a biomedical waste container, and hands were thoroughly washed.
Laboratory Procedures and Analysis of TBSs under the Optical Microscope
First, a 10% solution of Giemsa was prepared and left in a container. Next, thin blood smears were fixed with methanol using a Pasteur pipette and air-dried on a flat surface for three minutes. All TBSs were then stained with Giemsa 10% for 20 min and then rinsed with distilled water (pH = 7) [23]. Finally, the TBSs were air-dried before being examined under a light microscope (×100) with immersion oil. The TBSs were analyzed by two qualified technicians, with each slide examined only once. A quality control check of the microscopy readings was performed by a senior technician for 10% of randomly selected slides. Specifically, 5% of the slides analyzed by each technician were reassigned to the other for quality control. The quality control results for the TBSs were largely consistent with the individual results obtained by each technician.

2.5. Identification of Malaria Risk Factors

The identification of risk factors was conducted through the questionnaire survey targeting heads of households. Interviews were conducted individually. Each household’s head or representative was invited to respond to questions about their quality of life, malaria-related behaviors, and other relevant information such as socioeconomic, demographic, environmental, and behavioral factors and knowledge and attitude in relation to malaria. Participants responding to the questionnaire were previously reassured that the confidentiality of their responses would be fully respected.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The data were double-entered into Excel version 2019. Both files were then merged into a single database according to the data source. This database was exported into R version 4.3.2 software and RStudio version 2024.12.1-563 to calculate the prevalence and parasite density of malaria, expressed in proportions and geometric means, respectively. Odds ratio (OR) tests were used to evaluate the infection risk between genders, Pearson’s chi-square tests were used to compare proportions, and the Wilcoxon test was used to compare the parasite density between genders. Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to compare the parasite density between age groups. Associations between parasitic infections and questionnaires were assessed via binary logistic regression (BLR), with a significance threshold of 5%.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the Study Participants

This study included 915 individuals aged from three months to 91 years old living in the nine villages of the study area. The majority of participants were female (n = 541; 59.1%, 95% CI: 55.9–62.4), and they were older (29.5 years) compared to the males (25.5 years) (Z = −3.108; p = 0.002). Most participants were aged ≥14 years (n = 567, 62.0%; 95% CI: 58.9–65.2), compared to those aged 6 to 13 years (n = 140; 15.3%, 95% CI: 13.1–17.5) and those aged 0 to 5 years (n = 208; 22.7%, 95% CI: 20.0–25.5).

3.2. Malaria Infection Prevalence

Table 1 and Table 2 present the prevalence of malaria infection by gender and age group in different villages within the impact zone of the Singrobo–Ahouaty hydroelectric dam in 2021. The malaria prevalence was assessed by combining the results of the RDTs and TBSs (microscopy). An individual was considered malaria-positive when (i) the RDT alone was positive, (ii) the TBS alone was positive, or (iii) both the RDT and TBS were positive. The analysis was based on the odds ratio (OR) test, with “Male” as the reference category. The overall malaria prevalence in the study area was 43.1%, with 394 infected individuals out of 915 diagnosed. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) detected 330/915 cases (36.1%), and TBSs detected 232/875 cases (26.5%). The prevalence was higher with RDTs compared to microscopy (χ2 = 169.738; p < 0.0001) (Table 1). Furthermore, asymptomatic malaria [95.9% (16/386), CI95%: 93.7–97.7] was more prevalent than symptomatic malaria [4.1% (370/386), CI95%: 2.3–6.3], which is defined as having a fever of at least 37.5 °C (Figure 3).
Malaria Infection Prevalence by Gender
Overall, men had a slightly higher prevalence (46.8%) than women (40.5%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.067), although it was close to the 0.05 threshold. The OR (1.3) suggests that men were approximately 1.3 times more likely to be infected than women, but the confidence interval (1.0–1.7) includes 1, indicating that this difference could be due to chance. No statistically significant differences were observed between men and women in any of the villages (p > 0.05 in all cases). N’Dènou (60.0%; OR = 1.7), Amani-Menou (59.0%; OR = 1.5), and Pacobo (37.5%; OR = 2.6) showed higher malaria prevalence among men, but these differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In contrast, in Ahérémou-1 (48.3%; OR < 1), the prevalence was slightly higher among women, but again, the difference was not significant (p > 0.05) (Table 1).
Malaria Infection Prevalence by Age Groups
The malaria prevalence was 30.2% (171/567) among adolescents and adults (≥14 years), 74.3% (104/140) among school-age children (6–13 years), and 57.2% (119/208) among preschool children (0–5 years). The differences between the age groups were statistically significant (χ2 = 111.155; p < 0.0001) (Table 2). This difference between age groups was significant for Ahérémou-1, Singrobo, Ahouaty, Sokrogbo, Ahérémou-2, N’Dènou, and Amani-Menou (p < 0.05), but not in Pacobo and Kotiessou. In most villages, malaria prevalence was highest among school-age children, except in Singrobo, where the highest prevalence was observed in preschool children (Table 2).
Malaria Infection Prevalence by Village
The malaria prevalence varied significantly between villages (χ2 = 34.653; p < 0.0001) and was recorded as follows: 43.9% (25/57) in Ahérémou-1, 38.5% (42/109) in Singrobo, 26.6% (25/94) in Pacobo, 32.1% (27/84) in Ahouaty, 55.0% (83/151) in Sokrogbo, 35.9% (46/128) in Ahérémou-2, 41.9% (26/62) in Kotiessou, 51.2% (42/82) in N’Dènou, and 52.7% (78/148) in Amani-Menou. The highest prevalence was observed in Sokrogbo, N’Dènou, and Amani-Menou (Table 1). There was also no significant difference in the prevalence of asymptomatic and symptomatic malaria between the villages, although the rate of symptomatic malaria was slightly higher in Kotiessou (χ2 = 9041; p = 0.339) (Figure 3).
Proportion of Infection with Plasmodium spp.
A total of 915 RDTs were performed, of which 875 were also analyzed using TBS. The RDTs proved to be more sensitive than the TBS, as 318 samples tested positive with RDTs, while only 232 were detected as positive by TBS. Microscopy was used to identify P. falciparum and P. malariae. P. falciparum was the predominant species, detected in 228 individuals (98.3%), while P. malariae was detected in only three cases (1.7%), including a 56-year-old man in Pacobo and two preschool children in Sokrogbo. Additionally, a single case of mixed infection (0.4%) with both P. falciparum and P. malariae was observed in a 5-year-old boy in the village of Sokrogbo.

3.3. Malaria Parasite Density

Table 1 and Table 2 present the geometric mean parasite densities across the nine villages, stratified by gender and age groups. The parasite-negative individuals were removed from the parasite density estimates. Among the 915 blood samples collected, 875 were analyzed using light microscopy, of which 232 tested positive. The overall parasite density was 405.7 parasites/µL.
Malaria Parasite Density by Gender
On average, the geometric mean densities were 359.8 parasites/µL in women and 475.3 parasites/µL in men, with no significant difference between the two groups (Z = −1.528, p = 0.127). Similarly, across all villages, no significant association was observed between parasite density and gender (p > 0.05), except in Ahérémou-1, where men exhibited a moderately higher parasite density of 1208.2 parasites/µL (Z = −2.521, p = 0.012). In Amani-Menou, although the parasite density was higher in men (608.3 parasites/µL) than in women (289.8 parasites/µL), the difference was not statistically significant (Z = −1.909, p = 0.056) (Table 1).
Malaria Parasite Load by Age Groups
Overall, the parasite density was 160.4 parasites/µL in adolescents and adults (≥14 years), 509.0 parasites/µL in school-age children (6–13 years), and 1219.0 parasites/µL in children aged 0–5 years (ꭓ2kw = 43.383, p < 0.0001). The parasite density was relatively similar across the three groups in all villages (p > 0.005), except Sokrogbo (ꭓ2kw = 12.223, p = 0.002) and Amani-Menou (ꭓ2kw = 18.242, p < 0.0001), where children aged 0–5 years exhibited moderate parasite density (Table 2).
Parasite Density by Village
The geometric means of parasites densities of malaria in the nine villages were 5663.8 parasites/µL, 305.0 parasites/µL, 860.2 parasites/µL, 363.3 parasites/µL, 566.3 parasites/µL, 133.6 parasites/µL, 242.1 parasites/µL, 181.2 parasites/µL, and 409.3 parasites/µL, respectively, in 2021, in Ahérémou 1, Singrobo, Pacobo, Ahouaty, Sokrogbo, Ahérémou-2, Kotiessou, N’Dènou, and Amani–Menou (Table 1). A significant difference (ꭓ2kw = 31.080; p < 0.0001) was observed between the parasite density in different villages, and Ahérémou 1 had the highest parasite density.

3.4. Malaria Risk Factors

In this study, 244 household heads from different households were surveyed using a 40-question questionnaire covering socioeconomic, demographic, environmental, and behavioral characteristics, as well as malaria-related knowledge. The aim was to assess potential associations between malaria infection and these factors using binary logistic regression (BLR). BLR was applied to all 40 independent variables (Table S1). Variables with a significant p-value (p < 0.05) were reported in another table and considered risk factors for malaria transmission. Adjusted odds ratios (ORa) were then calculated. The analyses revealed three main risk factors for malaria transmission in the study area: occupation, monthly income, and the frequency of nuisance due to mosquito bites. In this context, mosquito nuisance refers to residents’ perception of how frequently they experience mosquito bites in their homes (Table 3).
The analyses show that occupation appears to be a determining factor in malaria transmission. Compared to unemployed people, informal sector workers had a significantly higher risk of malaria infection (ORa = 1.5; p = 0.017) (Table 3).
Similar increases in risk were observed among raw materials workers (ORa = 1.4; p = 0.048) and market gardeners (ORa = 0.9; p = 0.043). However, the latter group experienced a protective effect. Monthly income is also a factor associated with malaria transmission, with surprising results. Compared to individuals earning FCFA 60,000 or more, those earning less than FCFA 60,000 are at a greater risk of malaria infection (ORa = 0.7; p = 0.037). This is a statistically significant result, given that lower income is generally associated with living conditions that favor malaria transmission. No significant association was found for individuals with no income (p = 0.216). Mosquito nuisance frequency is strongly associated with the risk of malaria infection. Those reporting infrequent mosquito nuisance were less likely to contract the disease than those exposed several times a day (ORa = 0.4; p = 0.017) (Table 3).

4. Discussion

This study examined the epidemiological profile and risk factors of malaria around the Singrobo–Ahouaty hydroelectric dam, which is currently under construction. The aim was to gain a comprehensive understanding of malaria epidemiology and key transmission determinants during the construction phase, with the ultimate aim of assessing how short-, medium-, and long-term environmental and socioeconomic changes induced by the construction and operation of the dam may affect the malaria prevalence and transmission in the surrounding villages.
In this study, the overall prevalence of malaria around the Singrobo–Ahouaty dam was high (43.1%). Although this prevalence rate is approximately equal to 46.0% and lower than the 56.6% reported in studies conducted in 2010 and 2011, respectively [16], it is also approximately comparable to the 40.8% observed in a recent study conducted in south-eastern Côte d’Ivoire [24]. This difference may be due to the fact that the 2010–2011 study was conducted during the rainy season (June–July) [16], whereas the current study was conducted during the dry season (February 2021). In addition, studies in Cameroon (15%) and Tanzania (13%) reported lower prevalence rates [25,26], probably due to country-specific factors influencing malaria transmission. Overall, men and women were exposed to a similar risk of malaria infection. Behavioral and occupational patterns specific to each group result in similar levels of exposure. Common risk factors include prolonged outdoor exposure to mosquito bites and water-related agricultural activities such as market gardening and rice cultivation [27]. A previous study also reported higher malaria prevalence among men [16]. School-aged children (6–13 years) were more susceptible to malaria infection than younger children (0–5 years) and adolescents/adults (≥14 years). This finding is consistent with a study from Cameroon, which found that children aged 60–119 months were more likely to be infected with malaria than their younger siblings [26]. Older children are more exposed due to behaviors that increase their risk of mosquito bites [28,29,30], such as playing outdoors at night or sleeping without protective clothing or bed nets. In addition, their immunity to malaria is still developing, making them more susceptible to infections than adolescents and adults (≥14 years). Of the villages surveyed, Sokrogbo, N’Dènou, and Amani-Menou had the highest malaria prevalence. Surrounded by lowlands used for rice cultivation and market gardening, these villages have permanent water resources, even during the dry season, which favor mosquito breeding and contribute to malaria transmission [14,31,32]. In this study, P. falciparum and P. malariae were the only species detected, with P. falciparum accounting for 98.3% of cases. The absence of P. ovale may be due to its low prevalence [14,33,34,35,36] or the focus of the study on villages, unlike previous studies that included both rural and urban areas [16]. Asymptomatic malaria is widespread in all the villages in the study area, whereas symptomatic malaria appears to be slightly more prevalent in Kotiessou. This may be because current malaria control strategies do not consider asymptomatic cases, which continue to circulate undetected in the population [37]. Furthermore, Kotiessou is located close to the Tabbo hydroelectric dam, whose reservoir could create favorable conditions for the proliferation of malaria-carrying mosquitoes, thereby increasing the population’s exposure to infectious bites. Across all villages except Ahérémou 1, children aged 0–5 years had the highest parasite density (33,747.5 parasites/µL), reflecting the gradual acquisition of immunity to Plasmodium [16,38,39]. In endemic regions, young children initially have low immunity, making them more susceptible to infection, which improves with age [16,27]. The remarkably moderate parasite density in Ahérémou 1 (5663.9 parasites/µL) is mainly due to marked age-related contrast, with significantly high values observed in children (33,747.5 parasites/µL). This phenomenon is probably due to the relative weakness of their immunity to Plasmodium infection [38,39]. Overall, in highly endemic regions, children under five years of age tend to have higher infection rates than older children, adolescents, and adults because their host–parasite interactions remain unstable, allowing for higher parasite densities without typical malaria symptoms [40]. In Sokrogbo, men had significantly higher parasite densities, possibly related to occupational activities that increase their exposure to mosquitoes. This study highlights a marked heterogeneity of malaria transmission across villages and age groups and underscores the need for targeted malaria control strategies that take into account local variation, especially among young children. In this study, RDTs detected more positive cases than microscopy because they identify parasite antigens such as HRP2, which can persist after live parasites have been cleared, leading to false positives, especially in recently treated individuals [41]. HRP2-based RDTs can remain positive for 2–4 weeks, overestimating malaria prevalence [41]. In contrast, microscopy detects only active parasites [42]. Furthermore, in submicroscopic infections (parasitemia < 50 parasites/µL), RDTs remain positive, while microscopy fails [43].
Occupation is one of the factors that determines malaria transmission. Compared with unemployed people, workers in the informal sector are at a significantly higher risk of malaria infection. These results align with several other recent studies conducted in sub-Saharan Africa [44,45,46]. This could be due to working conditions exposing these individuals to environments conducive to mosquito proliferation, such as swampy areas, precarious housing, and limited access to preventive measures. An increased risk has also been observed among workers in the raw materials industry (cocoa, rubber, and oil palm). These workers are often required to work in forested areas or near stagnant water, which may increase their contact with malaria vectors. As with commodity workers, market gardeners and rice growers are also at an increased risk of malaria infection. Studies conducted in central and northern Côte d’Ivoire have emphasized the significant contribution of these agricultural activities to malaria transmission [47,48]. This could be explained by the nature of these activities, which are often carried out outdoors in areas close to wetlands or stagnant water, which are conducive to the proliferation of malaria vectors, particularly An. gambiae s.l. [49,50], which is the main malaria vector in the study area. This would make this group more susceptible to being bitten by malaria-carrying mosquitoes. These results emphasize the importance of considering occupational conditions when devising malaria control strategies, particularly when targeting high-risk groups such as informal workers and agricultural workers. Monthly income also appears to be a factor associated with malaria transmission. Indeed, individuals with a monthly income of less than 60,000 XOF have a significantly higher risk of malaria infection than those with an income equal to or above this threshold. Several other recent studies carried out in Côte d’Ivoire have also observed this phenomenon [45,51,52]. This highlights the impact of socioeconomic factors on vulnerability to the disease. Households with limited financial resources often face precarious living conditions characterized by inadequate housing that offers little protection against mosquitoes (e.g., absence of mosquito nets or open dwellings), proximity to mosquito breeding grounds (e.g., stagnant water), and limited access to preventive measures or healthcare in the event of fever. Furthermore, health-related expenses can pose a significant financial burden on low-income families, delaying access to treatment and perpetuating transmission foci. This finding underlines the need to integrate a socioeconomic approach into malaria control policies. In addition to socioeconomic factors, increased exposure to mosquito bites has been identified as a determining factor in the risk of malaria infection. This finding is consistent with vector biology and malaria transmission dynamics, both of which rely on infected Anopheles mosquitoes biting humans [43,53,54,55]. Frequent exposure can result from various factors, such as the absence or non-use of long-lasting insecticidal treated nets (LLINs), engaging in outdoor activities in the evening or at night, wearing unsuitable clothing, or living in poorly protected housing (e.g., windows without screens or open roofs). In Taabo, where climatic and environmental conditions favor mosquito proliferation, such exposure constitutes a major risk. This observation underlines the importance of incorporating vector prevention into control strategies, such as the mass distribution of LLINs, educating people on how to use them properly, improving housing, and running awareness campaigns about risky behavior.
After the operationalization of the Singrobo–Ahouaty dam, the permanent water body and suitable ecological conditions, combined with seasonal variations in rainfall, could further increase the risk of transmission. Malaria is rainfall-driven, and high rainfall is likely to enhance the survival and reproduction of vectors, consequently increasing the risk of malaria transmission [56].

Limitations of the Study

This study is part of the “Singrobo-Ahouaty Hydroelectric Development Project” health component, which targets several waterborne diseases, including malaria. However, the molecular aspect is not included in this project, preventing the implementation of molecular malaria diagnosis and the assessment of the genetic diversity of P. falciparum populations in the study area. The lack of molecular methods has limited malaria assessment to conventional methods such as RDTs and microscopy. PCR could have detected infections with low parasite loads and assessed genetic diversity, which is crucial for understanding transmission dynamics and the emergence of resistance.

5. Conclusions

This study examined the epidemiological profile and risk factors for malaria around the Singrobo–Ahouaty hydroelectric dam, highlighting a high prevalence. Men and women are equally at risk of malaria infection. Furthermore, school-age children are more exposed. P. falciparum was the most dominant species, while P. ovale was absent in this study. The key risk factors implicated in malaria transmission in the study area are occupation, monthly income, and an increased frequency of mosquito bites. It is vital to strengthen malaria prevention strategies, particularly through the use of LLINs. Regular maintenance ensures their effectiveness, reduces malaria transmission, and prevents mosquitoes from becoming resistant to insecticides. We recommend that health authorities and the WHO prioritize the distribution of good-quality nets, especially those adapted to the context, monitor their use, and launch awareness campaigns. This study argues for a community-based approach to malaria control in areas affected by development projects. Multi-sectoral collaboration between health, environment, and energy stakeholders is essential to integrate malaria control into dam management and to minimize health impacts on local communities. Continuous monitoring and further research are essential to track mosquito population dynamics and sporozooïtes and entomological inoculation infection rates and to adapt control strategies in this region, which will also benefit from a second hydroelectric dam.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/tropicalmed10070197/s1, Table S1: List of 40 questions administered to household heads in the villages in 2021.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.J.D.A., J.T.C. and K.D.S.; Methodology, T.J.D.A., N.G.-C., K.D.S. and J.T.C.; Validation, N.G.-C., K.D.S. and J.T.C.; Formal Analysis, T.J.D.A., J.T.C., C.N. and K.D.S.; Investigation, T.J.D.A., S.T., K.L.V., K.S.K., K.D., A.M.J.B., B.F.D. and K.D.; Resources, J.T.C. and K.D.S.; Data Curation, T.J.D.A.; Writing—Original draft, T.J.D.A.; Writing—Review & editing, T.J.D.A., K.D.S., C.N., J.T.C., N.K. and N.G.-C.; Visualisation, K.D.S. and J.T.C.; Supervision, K.D.S. and J.T.C.; Project Administration, J.T.C., K.D.S., N.K. and N.G.-C.; Funding Acquisition, J.T.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ivoire Hydro Energy (IHE) based in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Comité National d’Ethique des Sciences de la Vie et de la Santé en Côte d’Ivoire (CNESVS) (protocol code 149-22/MSHPCMU/CNESVS-kp on 13 October 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

This study has been approved by the CNESVS. Participants (aged 18 and above) provided written informed consent after having received clear information from the study team about the study procedures, benefits, and risks. Minors (under 18 years) signed an assent form with the informed consent form from parents/guardians. Confidentiality was ensured, guaranteeing participant anonymity.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to write up the results leading to the unambiguous conclusions of this article are included in the article. The raw databases used for the statistical analyses of this manuscript are available on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

All authors are thankful to local health, administrative, and traditional authorities in the district of Taabo and the populations of the study sites for their support during the field surveys, as well as academic and research institutions such as Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny, Université Polytechnique de San–Pédro, and Institut Pierre Richet/Institut National de Santé Publique in Côte d’Ivoire. The authors are very much thankful to the IHE company in Côte d’Ivoire, which is currently building the Singrobo-Ahouaty hydroelectric dam, for its great support and for facilitating access to local communities involved in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, the writing of the manuscript, or the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

BP: boîte postale; TBS: thin blood smear; RDT: rapid diagnostic test; ORa: adjusted odds ratio; WHO: World Health Organization; MW: megawatts; IHE: Ivoire Hydro Energie; CSRS: Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d’Ivoire; mm: millimeter; CNESVS: Comité National d’Ethique des Sciences de la Vie et de la Santé de Côte d’Ivoire; GCP: good clinical practice; ACT: artemisinin combination therapy; CHW: community health worker; GIS: geographic information system; PI: Principal investigator; OSM: open street map; HRP2: Histidin rich protein 2; OD: odds ratio; BLR: binary logistic regression; CI: confidence interval; µL: microliter; ꭓ2: Pearson chi-square; ꭓ2kw: Kruskal–Wallis chi-square; LLIN: long-lasting insecticidal treated nets; PCR: polymerase chain reaction.

References

  1. Skinner, J.; Niasse, M.; Haas, L. Partage des Bénéfices Issus des Grands Barrages en Afrique de l’Ouest, 1st ed.; International Institute for Environment and Development: London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. Word Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2024; Word Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  3. Word Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2023; Word Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  4. Word Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2022, 1st ed.; Word Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kigozi, S.P.; Kigozi, R.N.; Sebuguzi, C.M.; Cano, J.; Rutazaana, D.; Opigo, J.; Bousema, T.; Yeka, A.; Gasasira, A.; Sartorius, B.; et al. Spatial-temporal patterns of malaria incidence in Uganda using HMIS data from 2015 to 2019. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Word Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2015; Word Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kibret, S.; Lautze, J.; McCartney, M.; Nhamo, L.; Wilson, G.G. Malaria and large dams in sub-Saharan Africa: Future impacts in a changing climate. Malar. J. 2016, 15, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lautze, J.; McCartney, M.; Kirshen, P.; Olana, D.; Jayasinghe, G.; Spielman, A. Effect of a large dam on malaria risk: The Koka reservoir in Ethiopia. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2007, 12, 982–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Adja, A.M.; N’goran, E.K.; Koudou, B.G.; Dia, I.; Kengne, P.; Fontenille, D.; Chandre, F. Contribution of Anopheles funestus, An. gambiae and An. nili (Diptera: Culicidae) to the perennial malaria transmission in the southern and western forest areas of Côte d’Ivoire. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 2011, 105, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Adja, A.M.; Assouho, K.F.; Assi, S.-B.; Guindo-Coulibaly, N.; Tia, E.; Sagna, A.B.; Zoh, D.D.; Moro, A.C.; Yapi, A. High vectorial transmission of malaria in urban and rural settings in the northern, western and eastern regions of Côte d’Ivoire. J. Vector Borne Dis. 2022, 59, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Assouho, K.F.; Adja, A.M.; Guindo-Coulibaly, N.; Tia, E.; Kouadio, A.M.; Zoh, D.D.; Koné, M.; Kessé, N.; Koffi, B.; Sagna, A.B. Vectorial transmission of malaria in major districts of Côte d’Ivoire. J. Med. Entomol. 2020, 57, 908–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yokoly, F.N.; Zahouli, J.B.Z.; Small, G.; Ouattara, A.F.; Opoku, M.; De Souza, D.K.; Koudou, B.G. Assessing Anopheles vector species diversity and transmission of malaria in four health districts along the borders of Côte d’Ivoire. Malar. J. 2021, 20, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zoh, D.D.; Yapi, A.; Adja, M.A.; Guindo-Coulibaly, N.; Kpan, D.M.S.; Sagna, A.B.; Adou, A.K.; Cornelie, S.; Brengues, C.; Poinsignon, A.; et al. Role of Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles coluzzii (Diptera: Culicidae) in Human Malaria Transmission in Rural Areas of Bouaké, in Côte d’Ivoire. J. Med. Entomol. 2020, 57, 1254–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Benié, E.M.A.; Silué, K.D.; Ding, X.C.; Yeo, I.; Assamoi, J.B.; Tuo, K.; Gnagne, A.P.; Esso, L.J.C.E.; Coulibaly, J.T.; Assi, S.-B.; et al. Accuracy of a rapid diagnosis test, microscopy and loop-mediated isothermal amplification in the detection of asymptomatic Plasmodium infections in Korhogo, Northern Côte d’Ivoire. Malar. J. 2022, 21, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme en Côte d’Ivoire (PNLP). Le Paludisme en Côte d’Ivoire. 2020. Available online: https://www.pnlpcotedivoire.org/paludisme-en-cote-d-ivoire/ (accessed on 12 January 2025).
  16. Bassa, F.K.; Ouattara, M.; Silué, K.D.; Adiossan, L.G.; Baikoro, N.; Koné, S.; N’Cho, M.; Traoré, M.; Bonfoh, B.; Utzinger, J.; et al. Epidemiology of malaria in the Taabo health and demographic surveillance system, south-central Côte d’Ivoire. Malar. J. 2016, 15, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bureau National d’Etude Technologique et de Développement (BNETD). Projet d’Aménagement Hydroélectrique de Singrobo-Ahouaty (Côte d’Ivoire): Rapport d’Étude d’Impact Environnemental et Social; BNETD: Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire, 2017; p. 333. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kibret, S.; McCartney, M.; Lautze, J.; Jayasinghe, G. Malaria Transmission in the Vicinity of Impounded Water: Evidence from the Koka Reservoir, Ethiopia; IWMI: Colombo, Sri Lanka, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kibret, S.; Wilson, G.G.; Ryder, D.; Tekie, H.; Petros, B. Can water-level management reduce malaria mosquito abundance around large dams in sub-Saharan Africa? PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0196064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kibret, S.; Lautze, J.; McCartney, M.; Nhamo, L.; Yan, G. Malaria around large dams in Africa: Effect of environmental and transmission endemicity factors. Malar. J. 2019, 18, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Yewhalaw, D.; Legesse, W.; Van Bortel, W.; Gebre-Selassie, S.; Kloos, H.; Duchateau, L.; Speybroeck, N. Malaria and water resource development: The case of Gilgel-Gibe hydroelectric dam in Ethiopia. Malar. J. 2009, 8, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Endo, N.; Eltahir, E.A. Prevention of malaria transmission around reservoirs: An observational and modelling study on the effect of wind direction and village location. Lancet Planet. Health 2018, 2, e406–e413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Word Health Organization. Artemisinin and Artemisinin-Based Combination Therapy Resistance: Status Report; Word Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sadia-Kacou, C.A.; Adja, M.A.; Assi, S.-B.; Poinsignon, A.; Coulibaly, J.T.; Ouattara, A.F.; Remoué, F.; Koudou, B.G.; Tano, Y. Seasonal prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum infection and use of insecticide-treated nets among children in three agroecosystems in Aboisso, Côte d’Ivoire. Parasitol. Res. 2021, 120, 3663–3671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Khatib, R.A.; Chaki, P.P.; Wang, D.-Q.; Mlacha, Y.P.; Mihayo, M.G.; Gavana, T.; Xiao, N.; Zhou, X.-N.; Abdullah, S. Epidemiological characterization of malaria in rural southern Tanzania following China-Tanzania pilot joint malaria control baseline survey. Malar. J. 2018, 17, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kwenti, T.E.; Kwenti, T.D.B.; Latz, A.; Njunda, L.A.; Nkuo-Akenji, T. Epidemiological and clinical profile of paediatric malaria: A cross sectional study performed on febrile children in five epidemiological strata of malaria in Cameroon. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. de Abreu-Fernandes, R.; Almeida-de-Oliveira, N.K.; Gama, B.E.; Gomes, L.R.; De Lavigne Mello, A.R.; de Queiroz, L.T.; de Aguiar Barros, J.; das Graças Costa Alecrim, M.; de Souza, R.M.; Pratt-Riccio, L.R.; et al. Plasmodium falciparum Chloroquine-pfcrt Resistant Haplotypes in Brazilian Endemic Areas Four Decades after CQ Withdrawn. Pathogens 2023, 12, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Oladimeji, K.E.; Tsoka-Gwegweni, J.M.; Ojewole, E.; Yunga, S.T. Knowledge of malaria prevention among pregnant women and non-pregnant mothers of children aged under 5 years in Ibadan, South West Nigeria. Malar. J. 2019, 18, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yaya, S.; Bishwajit, G.; Ekholuenetale, M.; Shah, V.; Kadio, B.; Udenigwe, O. Knowledge of prevention, cause, symptom and practices of malaria among women in Burkina Faso. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0180508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mutegeki, E.; Chimbari, M.J.; Mukaratirwa, S. Assessment of individual and household malaria risk factors among women in a South African village. Acta Trop. 2017, 175, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zogo, B.; Tchiekoi, B.N.; Koffi, A.A.; Dahounto, A.; Ahoua Alou, L.P.; Dabiré, R.K.; Baba-Moussa, L.; Moiroux, N.; Pennetier, C. Impact of sunlight exposure on the residual efficacy of biolarvicides Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus against the main malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae. Malar. J. 2019, 18, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Koumba, A.A.; Koumba, C.R.Z.; Nguema, R.M.; Djogbenou, L.S.; Ondo, P.O.; Ketoh, G.K.; Comlan, P.; M’Batchi, B.; Mavoungou, J.F. Distribution spatiale et saisonnière des gîtes larvaires des moustiques dans les espaces agricoles de la zone de Mouila, Gabon. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2018, 12, 1754–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fuehrer, H.-P.; Campino, S.; Sutherland, C.J. The primate malaria parasites Plasmodium malariae, Plasmodium brasilianum and Plasmodium ovale spp.: Genomic insights into distribution, dispersal and host transitions. Malar. J. 2022, 21, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ehounoud, B.C.H.; Koyo, C.S.B.; Bongue, L.D.; Cortaredona, S.; Kakou, A.N.; Konan, D.B.; Patrick, Y.K.; Amanzougaghene, N.; N’guessan, J.-D.; Davoust, B. Assessment of the burden of malaria and bacteraemia by retrospective molecular diagnosis in febrile illnesses and first-line anti-infectives in Côte d’Ivoire. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2021, 43, 102105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Miezan, A.J.S.; Gnagne, A.P.; Bedia-Tanoh, A.V.; Kone, E.G.M.; Konate-Toure, A.A.; Angora, K.E.; Bosson-Vanga, A.H.; Kassi, K.F.; Kiki-Barro, P.C.M.; Djohan, V.; et al. Molecular epidemiology of non-falciparum Plasmodium infections in three different areas of the Ivory Coast. Malar. J. 2023, 22, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shin, H.-I.; Ku, B.; Kim, Y.J.; Kim, T.Y.; Cho, S.-H.; Lee, S.-E. Diagnosis and molecular analysis on imported Plasmodium ovale curtisi and P. ovale wallikeri malaria cases from West and South Africa during 2013–2016. Korean J. Parasitol. 2020, 58, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Biruksew, A.; Demeke, A.; Birhanu, Z.; Golassa, L.; Getnet, M.; Yewhalaw, D. Schoolchildren with asymptomatic malaria are potential hotspot for malaria reservoir in Ethiopia: Implications for malaria control and elimination efforts. Malar. J. 2023, 22, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Geiger, C.; Agustar, H.K.; Compaoré, G.; Coulibaly, B.; Sié, A.; Becher, H.; Lanzer, M.; Jänisch, T. Declining malaria parasite prevalence and trends of asymptomatic parasitaemia in a seasonal transmission setting in north-western Burkina Faso between 2000 and 2009–2012. Malar. J. 2013, 12, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Carneiro, I.; Roca-Feltrer, A.; Griffin, J.T.; Smith, L.; Tanner, M.; Schellenberg, J.A.; Greenwood, B.; Schellenberg, D. Age-patterns of malaria vary with severity, transmission intensity and seasonality in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and pooled analysis. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e8988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mukomena, S.E.; Philipe, C.M.; Désiré, M.K.; Pascal, L.T.; Ali, M.M.; Oscar, L.N. Parasitémie asymptomatique chez les enfants de moins de 5 ans, enfants en âge scolaire et prise en charge des épisodes fébriles dans les ménages de Lubumbashi, République Démocratique du Congo. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2016, 24, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Oulton, T.; Mahamar, A.; Sanogo, K.; Diallo, M.; Youssouf, A.; Niambele, S.M.; Samaké, S.; Keita, S.; Sinaba, Y.; Sacko, A.; et al. Persistence of Plasmodium falciparum HRP-2 antigenaemia after artemisinin combination therapy is not associated with gametocytes. Malar. J. 2022, 21, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Batwala, V.; Magnussen, P.; Nuwaha, F. Are rapid diagnostic tests more accurate in diagnosis of malaria compared to microscopy? Malar. J. 2010, 9, P5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Milali, M.P.; Sikulu-Lord, M.T.; Govella, N.J. Bites before and after bedtime can carry a high risk of human malaria infection. Malar. J. 2017, 16, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Larkai, N. Exposure to Malaria Awareness Messages and Preventive Health Behaviors Among Informal Workers in Ghana. Ph.D. Thesis, Walden University, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  45. N’Guessan, R.D.; Heitz-Tokpa, K.; Amalaman, D.M.; Tetchi, S.M.; Kallo, V.; Ndjoug Ndour, A.P.; Nicodem, G.; Koné, I.; Kreppel, K.; Bonfoh, B. Determinants of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis drop-out in the region of San-Pedro, Côte d’Ivoire. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 878886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Urama, C.E.; Manasseh, C.O.; Ukwueze, E.R.; Ogbuabor, J.E. Choices and determinants of malaria treatment seeking behaviour by rural households in Enugu state, South-East Nigeria. Int. J. Health Promot. Educ. 2021, 59, 156–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gbalegba, T.E.; M’Bra, N.C.; Kaba, K.R.; Boby, A.; Koné, O.M.; Chouaibou, M.; Koné, M.; Koudou, B.; Benjamin, G. Étude du niveau de production larvaire d’Anopheles gambiae sl (Diptera: Culicidae) dans différents types de gîtes à Oussou-yaokro au Centre-Ouest et à Korhogo, au Nord (Côte d’Ivoire). J. Appl. Biosci. 2016, 105, 10170–10182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dahoui, M. Evaluation de l’Impact des Mises en Valeur Agricole sur la Transmission du Paludisme à Bouaké, Côte d’Ivoire. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  49. Accrombessi, M.; Akogbeto, M.C.; Dangbenon, E.; Akpovi, H.; Sovi, A.; Yovogan, B.; Adoha, C.; Assongba, L.; Ogouyemi-Hounto, A.; Padonou, G.G. Malaria burden and associated risk factors in an area of pyrethroid-resistant vectors in Southern Benin. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2022, 107, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Akello, A.R.; Byagamy, J.P.; Etajak, S.; Okadhi, C.S.; Yeka, A. Factors influencing consistent use of bed nets for the control of malaria among children under 5 years in Soroti District, North Eastern Uganda. Malar. J. 2022, 21, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kouamé, P.K.; Dongo, K.; Fokou, G.; Apkatou, B.; Ouattara, A.F.; Bassirou, B. Assessing transmission patterns of flood-related waterborne diseases in two urban municipalities of Côte d’Ivoire. Res. Sq. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ouattara, Z.A.; Dongo, K.; Akpoti, K.; Kabo-Bah, A.T.; Attiogbé, F.; Siabi, E.K.; Iweh, C.D.; Gogo, G.H. Assessment of solid and liquid wastes management and health impacts along the failed sewerage systems in capital cities of African countries: Case of Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire. Front. Water 2023, 5, 1071686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bradley, J.; Lines, J.; Fuseini, G.; Schwabe, C.; Monti, F.; Slotman, M.; Vargas, D.; Garcia, G.; Hergott, D.; Kleinschmidt, I. Outdoor biting by Anopheles mosquitoes on Bioko Island does not currently impact on malaria control. Malar. J. 2015, 14, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Carnevale, P.; Manguin, S. Review of issues on residual malaria transmission. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 223, S61–S80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Doucoure, S.; Thiaw, O.; Wotodjo, A.N.; Bouganali, C.; Diagne, N.; Parola, P.; Sokhna, C. Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus biting patterns in Dielmo, an area of low level exposure to malaria vectors. Malar. J. 2020, 19, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Doumbia, M.; Coulibaly, J.T.; Silué, D.K.; Cissé, G.; N’Dione, J.-A.; Koné, B. Effects of climate variability on malaria transmission in southern Côte d’Ivoire, West Africa. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 7102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Map of the study area. (A): Geographic location of rural communities living in the area of the Singrobo–Ahouaty dam; (B,C): status of the construction progress of the Singrobo–Ahouaty dam in 2021 and 2024, respectively.
Figure 1. Map of the study area. (A): Geographic location of rural communities living in the area of the Singrobo–Ahouaty dam; (B,C): status of the construction progress of the Singrobo–Ahouaty dam in 2021 and 2024, respectively.
Tropicalmed 10 00197 g001
Figure 2. Ombrothermal diagram of the study area. (A): mean rainfall and temperature from 2012 to 2021, (B): rainfall and temperature in 2020, (C): rainfall and temperature in 2021.
Figure 2. Ombrothermal diagram of the study area. (A): mean rainfall and temperature from 2012 to 2021, (B): rainfall and temperature in 2020, (C): rainfall and temperature in 2021.
Tropicalmed 10 00197 g002
Figure 3. Map of the distribution of asymptomatic and symptomatic malaria infection in villages within the Singrobo–Ahouaty dam influence zone.
Figure 3. Map of the distribution of asymptomatic and symptomatic malaria infection in villages within the Singrobo–Ahouaty dam influence zone.
Tropicalmed 10 00197 g003
Table 1. Malaria infection prevalence and parasite density by gender in the villages in 2021.
Table 1. Malaria infection prevalence and parasite density by gender in the villages in 2021.
Prevalence (%)Parasite Density (Parasites/µL of Blood)
VillagesGenderNnPrevalenceOR (95% CI)pParasite DensityZpP. falciparumP. malariaeMix. Inf.
Ahérémou 1Male 281139.30.7 (0.2–2.2)0.5962650.4−0.7310.548500
Female 291448.312,103.6500
Total572543.95663.91000
SingroboMale 361642.11.3 (0.5–3.0)0.680310.5−0.2650.8121000
Female 672636.6302.32000
Total1034238.5305.03000
PacoboMale 381537.52.6 (0.9–7.6)0.058590.5−0.8400.414800
Female 531018.51420.5510
Total912526.6860.21310
AhouatyMale 361435.01.3 (0.5–3.6)0.645301.2−0.5790.5731000
Female 401329.5459.2800
Total762732.1363.31800
SokrogboMale 573357.91.2 (0.6–2.5)0.6151208.2−2.5210.0121711
Female 945053.2344.72810
Total1518355.0566.34521
Ahérémou 2Male 511937.21.1 (0.5–2.4)0.852111.8−0.9900.336800
Female 722735.1163.8700
Total1234635.9133.61500
KotiessouMale 291344.81.2 (0.4–3.9)0.797116.6−1.3830.180600
Female 331339.4348.71200
Total622641.9242.11800
N’DènouMale 291860.01.7 (0.6–4.8)0.258204.80.6780.535700
Female 332446.1170.51400
Total824251.2181.22100
Amani–MenouMale 613659.01.5 (0.8–3.1)0.242608.3−1.9090.0562700
Female 874248.3289.83100
Total1487852.7409.35800
GlobalMale 35717546.81.3 (1.0–1.7)0.067475.3−1.5280.1279811
Female 51821940.5359.813020
Total87539443.1405.722831
N = number of individuals examined, n = number of individuals infected with malaria, CI = confidence interval, (Z, p) = non-parametric Mann–Whitney test.
Table 2. Malaria infection prevalence and parasite density by age in the villages in 2021.
Table 2. Malaria infection prevalence and parasite density by age in the villages in 2021.
Prevalence (%)Parasite Density (Parasites/µL of Blood)
VillagesAge GroupNnPrevalence2pParasite Density2kwpP. falciparumP. malariaeMix. Inf.
Ahérémou 1>14 years34823.516.168<0.00017040.01.1450.564100
6–13 years141285.72237.7600
0–5 years955533,747.5300
Singrobo>14 years742027.013.1520.001201.01.5980.4501500
6–13 years9555.6261.8500
0–5 years261765.4615.41000
Pacobo>14 years571221.12.5320.282416.81.6800.432510
6–13 years18738.91673.1600
0–5 years19631.61027.6200
Ahouaty>14 years48918.810.7390.005228.60.9900.610600
6–13 years9666.7317.2400
0–5 years271244.4550.4800
Sokrogbo>14 years853035.333.830<0.0001217.112.2230.0021700
6–13 years292793.1520.91500
0–5 years372670.31696.41320
Ahérémou 2>14 years962829.214.8430.001110.32.0490.3591000
6–13 years10990.0225.4400
0–5 years22940.9112.0 1 00
Kotiessou>14 years351028.65.9030.052126.61.6310.442900
6–13 years12758.3256.1400
0–5 years15960.0742.8500
N’Dènou>14 years532037.711.9650.00390.23.1530.207900
6–13 years181583.3202.8900
0–5 years11763.61048.3300
Amani–Menou>14 years853440.013.4350.001188.318.242<0.00012400
6–13 years211676.25227.41400
0–5 years422866.79361.22000
Global>14 years56717130.2111.155<0.0001160.443.383<0.00019610
6–13 years14010474.3509.06700
0–5 years20811957.21219.06521
N = number examined, n = number infected with malaria, Mix. inf. = mixed infection, (Z, p) = non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test.
Table 3. Risk factors promoting malaria transmission in the Singrobo–Ahouaty dam influence zone in 2021.
Table 3. Risk factors promoting malaria transmission in the Singrobo–Ahouaty dam influence zone in 2021.
Risk FactorsModalitiesNn (%)ORa (IC 95%)p
Ocupation#No schooling115 (45.5)NA0.182
Public sector employee10331 (30.1)3.0 (0.8–11.5)0.107
Informal sector7020 (28.6)1.5 (0.7–3.4)0.017 *
Raw material sector102 (20.0)1.4 (0.6–3.3)0.048 *
Market gardening5011 (22.0)0.9 (0.2–4.8)0.043 *
Monthly income#60,000 FCFA and more 519 (17.7)NA0.074
Less than 60,000 FCFA13446 (34.2)0.7 (0.3–1.8)0.037 *
No income5914 (23.7)1.7 (0.8–3.4)0.216
Mosquito nuisance frequency#Rare447 (15.9)0.4 (0.2–1.0)0.017 *
Several times a day20062 (31.0)
N = number of people interviewed, n = number of people infected by malaria, % = proportion of people infected by malaria, ORa = adjusted odds ratio, IC95% = 95% confidence interval, NA = not applicable, (*) significant variables, and (#) reference category.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Avenié, T.J.D.; Silué, K.D.; Guindo-Coulibaly, N.; Koné, N.; Touré, S.; Valian, K.L.; Kouadio, K.S.; Bédia, A.M.J.; Déabo, B.F.; Diabagaté, K.; et al. Epidemiological Profile and Risk Factors for Malaria in Rural Communities Before the Operationalization of the Singrobo–Ahouaty Dam, Southern Côte d’Ivoire. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2025, 10, 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed10070197

AMA Style

Avenié TJD, Silué KD, Guindo-Coulibaly N, Koné N, Touré S, Valian KL, Kouadio KS, Bédia AMJ, Déabo BF, Diabagaté K, et al. Epidemiological Profile and Risk Factors for Malaria in Rural Communities Before the Operationalization of the Singrobo–Ahouaty Dam, Southern Côte d’Ivoire. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2025; 10(7):197. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed10070197

Chicago/Turabian Style

Avenié, Taki Jean Deles, Kigbafori Dieudonné Silué, Négnorogo Guindo-Coulibaly, Naférima Koné, Sadikou Touré, Kouamé Laurent Valian, Kouassi Séraphin Kouadio, Alloua Marie Joelle Bédia, Boza Fulgence Déabo, Klotcholman Diabagaté, and et al. 2025. "Epidemiological Profile and Risk Factors for Malaria in Rural Communities Before the Operationalization of the Singrobo–Ahouaty Dam, Southern Côte d’Ivoire" Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 10, no. 7: 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed10070197

APA Style

Avenié, T. J. D., Silué, K. D., Guindo-Coulibaly, N., Koné, N., Touré, S., Valian, K. L., Kouadio, K. S., Bédia, A. M. J., Déabo, B. F., Diabagaté, K., Nsanzabana, C., & Coulibaly, J. T. (2025). Epidemiological Profile and Risk Factors for Malaria in Rural Communities Before the Operationalization of the Singrobo–Ahouaty Dam, Southern Côte d’Ivoire. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, 10(7), 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed10070197

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop