Next Article in Journal
Urban Green Spaces and Their Need in Cities of Rapidly Urbanizing India: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
The Traditional Enjoyment of Noted Natural Places in Urban South Korea
Open AccessArticle

Evaluating Urban Odor with Field Olfactometry in Camden, NJ

1
Department of Geography, Planning, & Sustainability, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA
2
Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Urban Sci. 2019, 3(3), 93; https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3030093
Received: 1 July 2019 / Revised: 14 August 2019 / Accepted: 15 August 2019 / Published: 18 August 2019
Odor annoyance negatively impacts residents of communities adjacent to persistent nuisance industries. These residents, often with a high percentage of minority or otherwise marginalized residents, experience subjective and objective impacts on health and well-being; yet, reliable methods for quantifying and categorizing odors have been elusive. Field olfactometry is integral to the study of odor annoyance experienced by communities as it includes both qualitative (human perception) and quantitative (intensity measurement) dimensions of human odor experience and has been employed by municipalities in the U.S. to evaluate odor pollution levels. Cartographic visualization of odor data recorded using a field olfactometer offers further opportunity to evaluate potential patterns of odor annoyance, yet the use of field olfactometry and geographic information systems have not been frequently employed by geographers. By employing a mixed-methods approach to evaluate odor pollution, this study addresses the environmental justice context by quantifying and categorizing the presence of odor pollution in Waterfront South, a neighborhood in Camden, NJ previously identified for its disproportionate malodor burden. This study offers support to mixed methods research and the need for monitoring subjective and objective impacts in communities with compounding odor nuisance industries. View Full-Text
Keywords: odor pollution; environmental justice; field sampling; cartography odor pollution; environmental justice; field sampling; cartography
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kitson, J.; Leiva, M.; Christman, Z.; Dalton, P. Evaluating Urban Odor with Field Olfactometry in Camden, NJ. Urban Sci. 2019, 3, 93.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop