Irradiation Hardening Behavior of He-Irradiated V–Cr–Ti Alloys with Low Ti Addition
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
minor revision requested, see attachment
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Table 1: its presence should be commented more. "Chemical analyses" are mentioned .... which ones?Figs 2 and 3 seem overly repetitive and should be merged and made clear.
In line 117 you state: "This result indicates that damage microstructures thatformed at 700 ° C irradiation may be coarser than those formed at 500 ° C irradiation". Could you provide a bibliographic reference to better explain why?
Figs. 5 and 6 appear to be repetitive and are poorly scaled.
Line 161: Suddenly a grain boundary is mentioned which is present in the last Figure. Where does this grain boundary arise and what does it represent?
In Fig. 7 the analyzes with diffraction vectors are mentioned. However, these analyzes are not commented on and interpreted. They deserve further study and commentary in the text. Furthermore, the organization of Figure 7 itself as a whole appears deficient and should be reassembled in a more organic and elegant way. In general, Figure 7 is not commented at all as it deserves and some parts are totally left out in the discussion. Such discussions should contribute to the final conclusions, within which they are missing. The conclusions themselves therefore seem weak.
This article deserves careful further attention and should be implemented and modified.
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
Page 76-83: please check the english because there must be some mistake which makes the sentence incomprehensible.
132: i suggest to switch "it has reported" with "it has been reported"
143: do not repeat "because", use a synonim.
160-167: check the english!
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf