Next Article in Journal
A Practitioner’s Guide to Small Unmanned Aerial Systems for Bridge Inspection
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Water Drawdown and Dynamic Loads on Piled Raft: Two-Dimensional Finite Element Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Safety Assessment of Tunnel Portals for Site Selection Based on Spatial Information Geoprocessing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Stability Assessment of Earth Retaining Structures under Static and Seismic Conditions
Open AccessArticle

Comparative Study of Seismic Design and Performance of OMRF Building Using Indian, British, and European Codes

1
Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati 781039, India
2
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
3
Civil Engineering and Surveying, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Bellville Campus, Capetown 7530, South Africa
4
Civil Engineering Department, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, Allahabad 211004, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Infrastructures 2019, 4(4), 71; https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures4040071
Received: 25 September 2019 / Revised: 15 November 2019 / Accepted: 16 November 2019 / Published: 19 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Seismic Resilient Infrastructures)
In India, damage cause by some major earthquakes, such as India/Nepal 2015, Sikkim 2011, Kashmir 2005, Bhuj 2001, Latur 1993, and Uttarkashi 1991, have raised alarms to professionals. The probability of seismic risk is higher in more densely populated Indian cities, such as Bhuj, Kashmir, Sikkim, Uttarkashi, as they come under the highest seismicity zone in India. Therefore, our primary interest is to investigate the seismic performance evaluation of the buildings in these seismic prone areas. Significant research has been conducted on the seismic performance of existing buildings. However, investigations on the seismic performance of a building with different country codes for the same earthquake event has not been explored, which is crucial in providing a deeper knowledge of the seismic performance of buildings. This paper presents a comparative study of an Ordinary Moment Resistant Frame (OMRF) building designed using three major codes, Indian (IS: 456-2000, IS: 1893-2002), British (BS: 8110-1997) and European (EC-2, EC-8). Six typical building models considered with earthquake (WiEQ), and without earthquake (WoEQ), and their assessments were interpreted using non-linear static analysis for determining their seismic performance. Seismic performance is compared in terms of base shear coefficient (BSC) and drift ratio that shows WiEQ models, at the drift ratio of 1.5%, the BSC was as follows; 0.78, 0.88, and 0.96 for the models designed for British, Euro, and Indian codes, respectively. The results show that the building models, that have been designed for the Indian codal provisions for both cases, performed well as compared to the other country codes. Base shear and drift ratio are the vital parameters that vary considerably among the building models. This aspect of the Indian code makes it a safer design methodology with higher reserve strength and a reasonably good displacement capacity before reaching the Collapse Prevention (CP) performance level. View Full-Text
Keywords: OMRF building; pushover analysis; base shear coefficient; drift ratio OMRF building; pushover analysis; base shear coefficient; drift ratio
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Rajeev, A.; Meena, N.K.; Pallav, K. Comparative Study of Seismic Design and Performance of OMRF Building Using Indian, British, and European Codes. Infrastructures 2019, 4, 71.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop