Next Article in Journal
Ocular Autonomic Nervous System: An Update from Anatomy to Physiological Functions
Previous Article in Journal
Bleb-Independent Glaucoma Surgery to Activate the Uveolymphatic Route of Non-Trabecular Aqueous Humor Outflow: Short-Term Clinical and OCT Results
Article

Prediction Error Stabilization and Long-Term Standard Results with a Monofocal Intraocular Lens

1
Department of Ophthalmology, Cruces University Hospital, 48903 Barakaldo, Spain
2
Begiker-Ophthalmology Research Group, Department of Ophthalmology, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, OSI Bilbao Basurto, Facultad de Medicina, Campus de Vitoria-Gasteiz, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, Avenida Montevideo 18, 48013 Bilbao, Spain
3
Department of Ophthalmology, Araba University Hospital, 01004 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
4
Department of Ophthalmology, Quironsalud Hospital, 01002 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
5
Qvision, Department of Ophthalmology, VITHAS Hospital, 04120 Almeria, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: David P. Pinero
Received: 23 November 2021 / Revised: 4 January 2022 / Accepted: 10 January 2022 / Published: 13 January 2022
The aim of this study was to assess the stability and differences between objective (O-Rx) and subjective (S-Rx) refraction for the assessment of the prediction error (PE). A secondary aim was to report the results of a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL). 100 subjects were included for whom S-Rx and O-Rx were obtained for all visits, and for visual performance, posterior capsular opacification incidence and Nd:YAG rates at 12 months. Either S-Rx and O-Rx showed a hyperopic shift from 1 to 6 months (p < 0.05) and stabilization after 6 months. S-Rx was related with the axial length (rho = −0.29, p = 0.007), obtaining a major tendency towards hyperopia in short eyes implanted with high-power IOLs. O-Rx showed a myopic shift in comparison to S-Rx (p < 0.05). This resulted in a decrease of the number of eyes in ±0.50 D and ±1.00 D from 79 to 67% and from 94 to 90%, respectively. The median (interquartile range) uncorrected and corrected visual acuities were 0.1 (0.29) and 0 (0.12) logMAR, respectively, and seven eyes required Nd:YAG capsulotomy at 12 months. Some caution should be taken in PE studies in which O-Rx is used or S-Rx is measured in a 1-month follow-up. Constant optimization should be conducted for this IOL after S-Rx stabilization. View Full-Text
Keywords: intraocular lens; prediction error; stabilization intraocular lens; prediction error; stabilization
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Macías-Murelaga, B.; Garay-Aramburu, G.; Bergado-Mijangos, R.; Coello-Ojeda, D.; Ozaeta, I.; Garcia-Gómez, P.J.; Garrido-Fierro, J.; Rodríguez-Vallejo, M.; Fernández, J. Prediction Error Stabilization and Long-Term Standard Results with a Monofocal Intraocular Lens. Vision 2022, 6, 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision6010005

AMA Style

Macías-Murelaga B, Garay-Aramburu G, Bergado-Mijangos R, Coello-Ojeda D, Ozaeta I, Garcia-Gómez PJ, Garrido-Fierro J, Rodríguez-Vallejo M, Fernández J. Prediction Error Stabilization and Long-Term Standard Results with a Monofocal Intraocular Lens. Vision. 2022; 6(1):5. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision6010005

Chicago/Turabian Style

Macías-Murelaga, Beatríz, Gonzaga Garay-Aramburu, Roberto Bergado-Mijangos, Daniel Coello-Ojeda, Itziar Ozaeta, Pio J. Garcia-Gómez, Jesús Garrido-Fierro, Manuel Rodríguez-Vallejo, and Joaquín Fernández. 2022. "Prediction Error Stabilization and Long-Term Standard Results with a Monofocal Intraocular Lens" Vision 6, no. 1: 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision6010005

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop