Prediction Error Stabilization and Long-Term Standard Results with a Monofocal Intraocular Lens

Begiker-Ophthalmology Research Group, Department of Ophthalmology, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, OSI Bilbao Basurto, Facultad de Medicina, Campus de Vitoria-Gasteiz, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, Avenida Montevideo 18, 48013 Bilbao, Spain

Department of Ophthalmology, Araba University Hospital, 01004 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain

⁴

Department of Ophthalmology, Quironsalud Hospital, 01002 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain

⁵

Qvision, Department of Ophthalmology, VITHAS Hospital, 04120 Almeria, Spain

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Academic Editor: David P. Pinero

Vision 2022, 6(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/vision6010005

Received: 23 November 2021 / Revised: 4 January 2022 / Accepted: 10 January 2022 / Published: 13 January 2022

View Full-Text Download PDF

Browse Figures

Citation Export

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the stability and differences between objective (O-Rx) and subjective (S-Rx) refraction for the assessment of the prediction error (PE). A secondary aim was to report the results of a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL). 100 subjects were included for whom S-Rx and O-Rx were obtained for all visits, and for visual performance, posterior capsular opacification incidence and Nd:YAG rates at 12 months. Either S-Rx and O-Rx showed a hyperopic shift from 1 to 6 months (p < 0.05) and stabilization after 6 months. S-Rx was related with the axial length (rho = −0.29, p = 0.007), obtaining a major tendency towards hyperopia in short eyes implanted with high-power IOLs. O-Rx showed a myopic shift in comparison to S-Rx (p < 0.05). This resulted in a decrease of the number of eyes in ±0.50 D and ±1.00 D from 79 to 67% and from 94 to 90%, respectively. The median (interquartile range) uncorrected and corrected visual acuities were 0.1 (0.29) and 0 (0.12) logMAR, respectively, and seven eyes required Nd:YAG capsulotomy at 12 months. Some caution should be taken in PE studies in which O-Rx is used or S-Rx is measured in a 1-month follow-up. Constant optimization should be conducted for this IOL after S-Rx stabilization. View Full-Text

Keywords: intraocular lens; prediction error; stabilization

▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Macías-Murelaga, B.; Garay-Aramburu, G.; Bergado-Mijangos, R.; Coello-Ojeda, D.; Ozaeta, I.; Garcia-Gómez, P.J.; Garrido-Fierro, J.; Rodríguez-Vallejo, M.; Fernández, J. Prediction Error Stabilization and Long-Term Standard Results with a Monofocal Intraocular Lens. Vision 2022, 6, 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision6010005

AMA Style

Macías-Murelaga B, Garay-Aramburu G, Bergado-Mijangos R, Coello-Ojeda D, Ozaeta I, Garcia-Gómez PJ, Garrido-Fierro J, Rodríguez-Vallejo M, Fernández J. Prediction Error Stabilization and Long-Term Standard Results with a Monofocal Intraocular Lens. Vision. 2022; 6(1):5. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision6010005

Chicago/Turabian Style

Macías-Murelaga, Beatríz, Gonzaga Garay-Aramburu, Roberto Bergado-Mijangos, Daniel Coello-Ojeda, Itziar Ozaeta, Pio J. Garcia-Gómez, Jesús Garrido-Fierro, Manuel Rodríguez-Vallejo, and Joaquín Fernández. 2022. "Prediction Error Stabilization and Long-Term Standard Results with a Monofocal Intraocular Lens" Vision 6, no. 1: 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision6010005

Find Other Styles

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Abstract views Pdf views Html views

Article Menu

Prediction Error Stabilization and Long-Term Standard Results with a Monofocal Intraocular Lens

Abstract

Share and Cite

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI