Next Article in Journal
The Sun/Moon Illusion in a Medieval Irish Astronomical Tract
Next Article in Special Issue
What Can Eye Movements Tell Us about Higher Level Comprehension?
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Eye Behavior During Multiple Object Tracking and Multiple Identity Tracking
Open AccessReview

The Nature of Unconscious Attention to Subliminal Cues

Center for Neural and Cognitive Sciences, Science Complex, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana 500046, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vision 2019, 3(3), 38; https://doi.org/10.3390/vision3030038
Received: 28 February 2019 / Revised: 28 July 2019 / Accepted: 31 July 2019 / Published: 1 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Eye Movements and Visual Cognition)
Attentional selection in humans is mostly determined by what is important to them or by the saliency of the objects around them. How our visual and attentional system manage these various sources of attentional capture is one of the most intensely debated issues in cognitive psychology. Along with the traditional dichotomy of goal-driven and stimulus-driven theories, newer frameworks such as reward learning and selection history have been proposed as well to understand how a stimulus captures attention. However, surprisingly little is known about the different forms of attentional control by information that is not consciously accessible to us. In this article, we will review several studies that have examined attentional capture by subliminal cues. We will specifically focus on spatial cuing studies that have shown through response times and eye movements that subliminal cues can affect attentional selection. A majority of these studies have argued that attentional capture by subliminal cues is entirely automatic and stimulus-driven. We will evaluate their claims of automaticity and contrast them with a few other studies that have suggested that orienting to unconscious cues proceeds in a manner that is contingent with the top-down goals of the individual. Resolving this debate has consequences for understanding the depths and the limits of unconscious processing. It has implications for general theories of attentional selection as well. In this review, we aim to provide the current status of research in this domain and point out open questions and future directions. View Full-Text
Keywords: attention; unconscious; subliminal; top-down; bottom-up; contingent capture attention; unconscious; subliminal; top-down; bottom-up; contingent capture
MDPI and ACS Style

Prasad, S.; Mishra, R.K. The Nature of Unconscious Attention to Subliminal Cues. Vision 2019, 3, 38.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop