Next Article in Journal
An Intelligent Fishery Detection Method Based on Cross-Domain Image Feature Fusion
Previous Article in Journal
Heterogeneous Weight Development of Lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus) Used as Cleaner Fish in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) Farming
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Starfish Predatory Pressure on the Immune and Antioxidant Functions of Sea Cucumber Apostichopus japonicus

1
Dalian Jinshiwan Laboratory, Dalian 116034, China
2
Dalian Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources for Marine Shellfish, Key Laboratory of Protection and Utilization of Aquatic Germplasm Resource, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Liaoning Ocean and Fisheries Science Research Institute, Dalian 116023, China
3
China College of Fisheries and Life Sciences, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China
4
Dalian Scitech Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian 116100, China
5
School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Fishes 2024, 9(9), 337; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9090337
Submission received: 31 July 2024 / Revised: 21 August 2024 / Accepted: 23 August 2024 / Published: 27 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Aquatic Invertebrates)

Abstract

This study simulated the effects of direct predatory pressure, indirect predatory pressure, and conspecific injury signals on sea cucumber (Apostichopus japonicus) to determine changes in the activity of immune defense enzymes (lysozyme, acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase) and antioxidant stress enzymes (catalase, superoxide dismutase, malondialdehyde). Samples of sea cucumber juveniles were collected at 3 h, 12 h, 72 h, and 96 h post predatory stress, and six enzymes related to immune defense and antioxidant stress were selected for activity assays, namely, lysozyme (LZM), acid phosphatase (ACP), alkaline phosphatase (AKP), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and malondialdehyde (MDA). The results indicate that under direct predatory pressure, the activity of catalase in sea cucumbers was significantly higher than that of the control group at 3 h (P < 0.05), while the activities of acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, and catalase were significantly lower at 72 h (P < 0.05). Under indirect predatory pressure, the activity of malondialdehyde in sea cucumbers was significantly higher than that of the control group at 12 h (P < 0.05), the activity of alkaline phosphatase was significantly higher at 72 and 96 h (P < 0.05), the activity of catalase was significantly lower at 72 h, and the activity of superoxide dismutase was significantly higher at 72 h (P < 0.05). Under the influence of conspecific injury signals, the activity of malondialdehyde in sea cucumbers was significantly higher than that of the control group at 12 h (P < 0.05), and the activity of superoxide dismutase was significantly higher at 96 h (P < 0.05). The sea cucumber enhanced its antioxidant capacity 3 h after facing a predator, while its immune defense mechanism was suppressed at 72 h. When facing indirect predatory pressure, the sea cucumber may have made immune and antioxidant preparations for the arrival of unknown risks. The experimental results show that predatory pressure has a significant impact on the immune and antioxidant functions of sea cucumbers, which may be related to the physiological state and environmental adaptability of the sea cucumber. This study provides a new perspective for understanding how sea cucumbers cope with predatory pressure in the natural environment and offers theoretical support for the cultivation management of sea cucumbers.
Key Contribution: This study investigated the impact of starfish-derived predatory pressures and conspecific injury signals on the immune and antioxidant enzyme activities in the sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. The enzymes analyzed included lysozyme, acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase for immune defense, catalase, superoxide dismutase, and malondialdehyde for antioxidant stress. The sea cucumbers’ responses were measured at various time points after the application of predatory stress. Key findings were that direct predation led to an initial increase in catalase activity, followed by a decrease at 72 h. Indirect predation and conspecific injury signals triggered higher malondialdehyde levels and changes in other enzyme activities at specific time intervals. The study suggests that sea cucumbers can modulate their immune and antioxidant systems in response to predatory threats, which has implications for their survival strategies and aquaculture practices.

1. Introduction

Predation is a key factor in regulating the population structure of invertebrates in aquatic ecosystems. In particular, high predation rates on early juvenile stages of bivalve mollusks and echinoderms significantly impact the survival rates of their populations [1,2]. The sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus, as a species of aquatic animal, faces a variety of predatory threats from various animals, including marine mammals, seabirds, fish, starfish (especially Asterina pectinifera), crustaceans, and gastropods [3]. Although starfish are the primary predator of the sea cucumber due to their specific biosensory perception, there is still a lack of in-depth studies on the impact of predators on sea cucumbers [4,5].
Predatory pressure can be divided into direct types (direct challenges to homeostasis, such as injury or predator attacks) and indirect types (perceived threats that require cognitive assessment, such as cues of predation risk) [6]. Under indirect predatory pressure, prey can respond after recognizing risk signals of predation. For example, the prey must identify and assess the predator’s odor and then respond behaviorally and physiologically. Another example is the rapid behavioral and physiological response to the alarm cues of injured conspecifics or heterospecifics. Sea urchins can respond to alarm cues from injured or killed conspecifics [7,8,9,10]. However, it remains unclear whether sea cucumbers respond to signals emitted by injured conspecifics. Hamel et al. [11] found that Cucumaria frondosa can not only recognize threat signals (such as the odor of predators or alarm signals from injured prey) but also induce coelomocyte immune function. Despite this, there are no reported studies on the effects of starfish predatory pressure on A. japonicus.
Aquatic organisms with limited mobility and without distinct sensory organs such as limbs or eyes depend on behavioral, physiological, and immunological adaptations to counter environmental stress. Burnovicz et al. [12] established a link between escape behavior and cardiac reactivity in crabs, highlighting the activation of defensive mechanisms in response to threats. In organisms lacking measurable physiological responses like cardiac function, immunological changes offer a viable assessment approach. Sea cucumbers (A. japonicus) predominantly exhibit non-specific immunity, primarily through humoral defense mechanisms [13]. Their coelomic fluid, rich in immune cells and factors, constitutes a robust immune defense that neutralizes invading substances once through the initial body wall barrier. Monitoring immune enzyme activity in sea cucumbers is essential for elucidating how they physiologically respond to stressors [14]. The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) escalates under environmental stress, potentially causing cellular damage. Sea cucumbers employ an antioxidant system to mitigate this oxidative stress, with key enzymatic antioxidants such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase playing critical roles [15]. Examining the activity of these antioxidant enzymes under predatory stress provides insights into the sea cucumber’s regulatory strategies against environmental challenges.
This research employed A. japonicus to explore the effects of direct and indirect predation stress, along with alarm cues from injured conspecifics, on the enzymatic activities related to immune response and oxidative stress in sea cucumbers. Through the assessment of physiological reactions across a spectrum of predatory contexts, the study sought to reveal novel perspectives on the adaptive mechanisms sea cucumbers employ to counteract predatory challenges.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Materials

The A. japonicus sea cucumbers used in the study were purchased from a farm in Wafangdian city and quickly transported to the mariculture laboratory of the Liaoning Ocean and Fisheries Science Research Institute for temporary cultivation. A total of 360 healthy sea cucumbers (wet weight of 0.42 ± 0.15 g, mean ± standard deviation) were randomly selected for the experiment. The sea cucumbers were placed in triangular tanks for temporary cultivation and fed with commercial sea mud powder mixed with commercial seaweed powder in a ratio of 1:1. The photoperiod for cultivation was 12 h light: 12 h dark (12L:12D), and the residual feed and feces at the bottom of the pool were cleaned daily, with one-third of the seawater replaced. To standardize the experiment, the sea cucumbers were fasted for three days prior to the experiment and throughout its duration.
The starfish Asterina pectinifera were collected from the offshore region in Dalian city and promptly transferred to the mariculture facility at the Liaoning Ocean and Fisheries Science Research Institute. With an average wet mass of 60.83 ± 8.57 g and a radius measuring 56.57 ± 2.73 mm, these specimens were housed in triangular tanks under fasting conditions to standardize their physiological state. A two-week pre-cultivation period was implemented to ensure a consistent level of hunger among the individuals.

2.2. Experimental Design

Following the pre-cultivation phase, healthy sea cucumbers (A. japonicus) were randomly assigned to one of four experimental groups to evaluate the effects of different predatory pressures on their immune and antioxidant enzyme activities: (1) Group I: direct predation pressure, one hungry starfish coexisted with sea cucumbers in the same tank; (2) Group II: indirect predation pressure, one hungry starfish sieged in a basket with small holes on all sides, co-cultivated in the tank with the sea cucumbers; (3) Group III: injured conspecific information, a wound of about 1 cm was made on the back of a healthy sea cucumber with a dissecting knife as the source of the injured conspecific individual, and 10 wounded sea cucumbers were processed and placed in a basket with holes on all sides, which was then co-cultivated with 30 healthy sea cucumbers; (4) Group 0: healthy control, only sea cucumbers were in the tank without any other biological stimulation conditions. Each experimental group was replicated three times, with each replicate containing 30 healthy sea cucumbers. The trials were carried out in triangular tanks. The environmental conditions were tightly controlled with a photoperiod of 12 h light to 12 h darkness (12D:12L). The experimental temperature was maintained at 22.09 ± 0.68 °C, salinity at 31.59 ± 0.18, and dissolved oxygen levels at 6.47 ± 0.13 mg/L. To maintain consistent predatory pressure, water was not exchanged, and no additional feed was provided throughout the duration of the experiment.

2.3. Sample Collection

At the onset of the application of different predation pressures for each experimental group, six healthy sea cucumbers were rapidly collected from each group at 3, 12, 72, and 96 h after exposure to various pressures based on relevant literature [11,16] and the results of our preliminary experiments. The samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and then transferred to a −80 °C freezer for storage to be used for subsequent enzyme activity assays.

2.4. Enzyme Activity Assay

For the enzyme activity assay, the sea cucumber juveniles preserved at −80 °C were taken out and slowly thawed in an ice bath. After completely thawing, the sea cucumbers were weighed, and a homogenate was prepared by adding homogenizing buffer at a 9:1 ratio to the weight. The tissue homogenate was centrifuged at 4 °C at 3500× g for 10 min, and the supernatant was collected for enzyme activity assays using kits from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China. Specific enzyme indicators and testing methods are shown in Table 1.

3. Results and Analysis

3.1. Direct Predation of Sea Cucumbers by A. pectinifera

Figure 1 depicts a starfish feeding on sea cucumbers during the experimental phase, with a red circle highlighting the sea cucumber currently being predated. Throughout the predation event, the sea cucumber’s sluggish mobility allows the starfish to approach incrementally, using its tube feet to ensnare the sea cucumber adjacent to its beak. The starfish then contours its body, creating a secure enclosure against the pool’s boundary, enveloping the sea cucumber tightly before extruding its stomach to commence the digestion process. This continues until the sea cucumber’s hue progressively lightens, culminating in its complete assimilation by A. pectinifera.

3.2. Changes in the Activity of Immune Defense Enzymes in Sea Cucumbers under Different Predation Pressures

Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 illustrate the temporal variations in the activities of lysozyme, acid phosphatase, and alkaline phosphatase in sea cucumbers under three types of predation pressures. The trend of lysozyme activity reveals that, compared with the control group, both the direct predation pressure group and the injury information group exhibited a decrease followed by an increase in lysozyme activity. At 3 and 12 h, the activity in both groups was lower than the control, slightly higher at 72 h, and showed an increasing trend by 96 h (Figure 2).
Figure 3 depicts the activity changes of acid phosphatase under the three types of pressures. Group I displayed a distinctive pattern of increase, decrease, and subsequent increase, with a significant drop in activity at 72 h compared to the control (P < 0.05), followed by a sharp increase at 96 h that exceeded the control levels. Groups II and III showed a slight increase in acid phosphatase activity at 3 and 12 h, which was slightly lower than the control at 72 and 96 h.
The activity trends of alkaline phosphatase under the three pressures are presented in Figure 4. Alkaline phosphatase activity in Group I was slightly higher at 3 h, began to decline at 12 h, and was significantly lower than the control at 72 h (P < 0.05), before rapidly increasing and becoming significantly higher than the control at 96 h (P < 0.05). Group II showed no significant difference from the control at 3 and 12 h, but exhibited a significant increase at 72 and 96 h (P < 0.05). In contrast, Group III, apart from being essentially equivalent to the control at 3 h, showed a slight but non-distinct increase at other time points compared to the control.

3.3. Changes in Antioxidant Stress Enzyme Activity in Sea Cucumbers under Different Predation Pressures

The change in catalase (CAT) activity in sea cucumbers under different predation pressures is shown in Figure 5. Compared with the control group, the activity in Group I significantly increased at 3 h (P < 0.05), then began to decrease, and at 72 h its activity was significantly lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05), but started to increase at 96 h, and was slightly higher than the control group. Compared with the control group, the indirect predation group and the injured information group showed significantly reduced enzyme activity at 72 h (P < 0.05), while it did show significant differences at other time points.
An overall upward trend in the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) in each group is revealed in Figure 6. The enzyme activity in the three predation pressure groups at 3 h and 12 h was not significantly different from the control group, but at 72 h and 96 h, the enzyme activity in all three predation pressure groups was higher than that of the control group, with Group II showing a significant increase in enzyme activity at 72 h (P < 0.05) and Group III showing a significant increase in enzyme activity at 96 h (P < 0.05) (Figure 6).
Figure 7 shows the change in malondialdehyde (MDA) activity in sea cucumbers under the three predation pressures. The overall trend of MDA activity in all groups was an initial increase followed by a decrease, but compared with the control group, the levels of the treatment groups varied. Among them, the MDA activity in Group I at 96 h was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05); the MDA activity in the indirect pressure group was significantly lower than that of the control group at 3 h (P < 0.05), rapidly increased at 12 h, and was significantly higher than the control group (P < 0.05), and as time extended, the activity remained higher than that of the control group, but the difference was not significant. Group II, however, was significantly higher than the control group at 12 h (P < 0.05), with no significant differences at other time points.

4. Discussion

It is currently known that the primary predators of juvenile sea cucumbers in the wild include carnivorous fish, starfish, sea urchins, crabs, and gastropods [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Among these diverse predators, starfish A. pectinifera have emerged as the main predators of juvenile sea cucumbers, which can consume sea cucumbers smaller than 5 cm, and their high numbers often lead to significant mortality in both wild and enclosed sea cucumber populations [18,25,26]. Hatanaka et al. [18] demonstrated that A. pectinifera can prey on smaller-sized sea cucumbers, with A. pectinifera averaging an arm length of 43.3 mm consuming 1.8, 0.5, and 0.1 sea cucumbers daily with average body lengths of 15.9, 30.1, and 40.0 mm, respectively. In this study, photographs of starfish preying on sea cucumbers were also captured, showing the sea cucumbers wrapped in the everted stomach of the starfish, with their skin already digested, further confirming the predatory behavior of starfish towards juvenile sea cucumbers. Therefore, A. pectinifera starfish were selected as the agents to exert predation pressure on sea cucumbers in this study.
This study measured and compared the activities of enzymes related to the immune and antioxidant defense of sea cucumbers, examining the effects of direct predation pressure, indirect predation pressure, and injury in conspecifics. The study reveals that sea cucumbers exhibit altered immune and antioxidant responses not only to direct predation stress but also to chemical signals emitted by nearby predators or injured members of their own species. Stress can be defined in various ways but can be considered the organism’s response to challenges that may pose real and potential threats to its integrity [27]. Predation pressure can be categorized into direct stress, which involves predation by predators (including physical impacts such as contact, light and shadow, and water currents), and indirect stress, which encompasses chemical cues from nearby predators (perceived without physical contact) and chemical cues released by injured conspecifics. For vertebrates, responses to these pressures might involve fear or anxiety in the face of imminent or potential danger [28]. The stress responses to these two scenarios likely involve a broad range of mechanisms, including changes in genetics, metabolism, energy, immunity, endocrinology, neurology, and behavior, aimed at overcoming and compensating for the imbalances caused by stressors. With these responses, animals attempt to avoid dangerous situations and any threats to their survival or integrity, ultimately striving to reintegrate into a balanced state [27].

4.1. Changes in Immune Defense-Related Functions of Sea Cucumbers under Different Predation Pressures

As an invertebrate, the sea cucumber lacks adaptive immunity, relying instead on innate immunity. The coelomocytes and immune markers can directly reflect the animal’s response to environmental stress [29]. Lysozyme (LZM) is an important immune factor widely present in animal cells and coelomic fluid, playing a role in the non-specific immune system by lysing bacteria and aiding the body in resisting bacterial infections [30]. Changes in environmental factors, such as salinity, can lead to an increase in the activity of lysozyme in the sea cucumber’s coelomic fluid [31]. Under pH stress, the activity of lysozyme in sea cucumbers significantly decreases [32]. Acid phosphatase (ACP) and alkaline phosphatase (AKP), as crucial enzymes in the non-specific immune response, participate in the elimination of pathogens, and their activities can change in response to environmental stimuli [33,34,35,36].
In this study, the activities of the three enzymes in the direct predation group generally followed a trend of initial decrease followed by an increase. The activities of ACP and AKP were significantly lower than the control group at 72 h, which may be due to the fear of the predator suppressing the sea cucumber’s consumption of ATP to adapt to the environment with the presence of a predator. The inorganic phosphate required for ATP synthesis is generated through the hydrolysis of phosphoesters by acid and alkaline phosphatases [29]. This suggests that the sea cucumber’s immune defense mechanism was suppressed at 72 h after facing the predator, increasing the likelihood of pathogen invasion. This is similar to the response in lepidopteran larvae, where predator-induced stress reduces their immunity to bacteria, leading to physiological consequences such as reduced body mass [37]. In the indirect predation group, the activity of alkaline phosphatase was significantly higher than the control group at 72 and 96 h. This indicates that indirect pressure, such as chemical signals from predators, has an impact on the sea cucumber’s immune defense system, enhancing its immune defense, which is beneficial for the growth and survival of the sea cucumber. Without loss of tissue integrity, the immune system of the sea cucumber increased the activity of immune enzymes, preparing for potential damage. It is speculated that sea cucumbers can detect impending attacks and respond to increase their chances of survival in non-lethal predatory events [11], but this preparation is relatively slow (significant differences were only shown at 72 h). In the injury information group, the activities of lysozyme, acid phosphatase, and alkaline phosphatase fluctuated at various time points but did not show significant changes, indicating that the sea cucumber may have made some immune defense preparations for potential harm after recognizing the information from injured conspecifics. It can be seen that when sea cucumbers encounter direct predation pressure, their non-specific immunity may decrease, and this pressure may suppress the immune defense function of the sea cucumber. Under indirect pressure, the sea cucumber prepares for immune defense in the face of recognized potential danger [11]. The recognition of predator information helps the sea cucumber to enhance non-specific immunity, which is beneficial for its survival and growth. Further exploration is needed to understand how predation pressure affects the expression of immune-related molecules in sea cucumbers.

4.2. Changes in Antioxidant Defense Functions of Sea Cucumbers under Different Predation Pressures

Environmental stress factors primarily affect organisms by causing oxidative damage due to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) resulting from abnormal aerobic metabolism [38]. To survive, organisms employ a range of measures to reduce the levels of reactive oxygen species. The defense against oxidative damage in sea cucumbers mainly relies on enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants, protecting them from the harmful effects of a variety of reactive oxygen species [39]. Antioxidant enzymes are a crucial part of the sea cucumber’s resistance to ROS, including catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD). The activity of these antioxidant enzymes may change in response to environmental changes and stress.
SOD can reduce oxidative free radicals within the body, mitigating oxidative damage. Catalase catalyzes the decomposition of excess hydrogen peroxide in cells [40]. Malondialdehyde (MDA) is a biomarker of oxidative damage in organisms, directly reflecting the stress caused by oxidative free radicals [41], and its accumulation is positively correlated with the degree of oxidative stress experienced by the organism [42].
In this study, facing direct predation pressure, the activity of CAT in sea cucumbers significantly increased at 3 h, catalyzing the decomposition of excess H2O2 produced by the direct predation pressure [40]. We speculate that CAT may serve as an indicator of the sea cucumber’s response to predation pressure. At 96 h, although the activity of MDA in the direct predation group decreased, it remained significantly higher than that of the control group, indicating that sea cucumbers may still be affected by the oxidative stress brought about by direct predation pressure. When facing indirect predation pressure, the activities of SOD and CAT in sea cucumbers both showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing with time, similar to the trend observed under pH stress [32]. Significant differences were shown in both enzymes compared with the control group at 72 h. The increase in SOD activity is similar to the results of studies where pollutants stimulate sea cucumbers [43], suggesting that the increase in SOD activity may be due to oxidative stress in sea cucumbers after recognizing the information from predators, and this increase may lead to an increase in H2O2 levels. However, in this experiment, the activity of CAT did not compensate for the increase in SOD activity. The lack of a compensatory increase in CAT activity in sea cucumbers could imply that the organism is experiencing a temporary imbalance in its antioxidant response, which may be due to several factors. For instance, the production of CAT might be delayed or limited by other physiological constraints, or the sea cucumbers might be utilizing alternative pathways to manage the increased levels of hydrogen peroxide. It is also possible that the sea cucumbers are experiencing a state of oxidative stress that is overwhelming their CAT capacity, leading to a build-up of hydrogen peroxide. Li et al. [15] observed in a low dissolved oxygen stress experiment of the sea cucumber A. japonicus that the changes in SOD and CAT in the tissues showed an opposite trend. Sun et al. [44] also found in a study on Yesso scallops that the changes in SOD and CAT in the serum of Yesso scallops after feeding with Antheraea pernyi cecropin were not consistent, indicating that the mechanisms of these two antioxidant enzymes are not the same. From the trend of MDA activity changes, at 12 h, the MDA activity in all pressure groups increased rapidly, indicating that the body was stimulated by oxidative stress. MDA is one of the products of lipid peroxidation that occurs in biological membranes under stress conditions. Its concentration is indicative of the degree of membrane lipid peroxidation. When an organism is exposed to stressors such as salt stress, hypotonic stress [45], and tissue damage [46], the MDA content rapidly increases over a short period. As time progressed to 72 h, with the increase in SOD activity across all stress groups, the levels of MDA in each group returned to levels comparable to those of the control group. This outcome aligns with the findings of Sha et al. [47], who studied the effects of low-temperature stress on A. japonicus. Further research found that the change in CAT activity in sea cucumbers exposed to injured conspecific information was similar to that in the indirect pressure group, but the change in SOD activity was similar to that in the direct pressure group. This may be due to the slow recognition of injured conspecific information by sea cucumbers, leading to a significant increase in SOD activity only at 96 h, similar to the results of immune enzymes. Moreover, the MDA value in the injured information group at 96 h had decreased to the lowest among all groups, corresponding to the highest SOD enzyme activity at this time point. It is speculated that the sea cucumber’s response to the information from injured conspecifics is slow and weak, leading to a delayed but more pronounced induction of SOD enzyme synthesis, which clears the oxidative stress damage caused by the accumulation of MDA. Li et al. [15] also observed that, under hypoxic stress, the activity of SOD in the muscle tissue of sea cucumbers increased, while the MDA activity decreased [15].
The changes in enzyme activity indicate that the immune and antioxidant systems of sea cucumbers produce different responses under different predation pressures. A series of comprehensive enzyme adjustments can help sea cucumbers regulate their physiology under predation pressure, and then improve their adaptability to different predation pressure environments by adjusting their own state. Given that predatory stress can induce stress responses in the sea cucumber A. japonicus, leading to a suboptimal state that affects their growth and survival, the primary strategies include not only actively seeking methods for the control and removal of starfish but also focusing on environmental design and management to reduce the sea cucumbers’ vulnerability. This involves providing sheltered areas and managing the cultivation density. Moreover, enhancing the immune response of sea cucumbers through nutritional modulation and genetic selection is a promising approach to alleviate environmental stress in the future.

5. Conclusions

This study reveals the complexity of the impact of predator pressure on the immune and antioxidant functions of sea cucumbers. Facing different types of predation pressures, sea cucumbers can respond to direct and indirect predation pressures by regulating their immune and antioxidant enzyme activities at 72 h. The physiological response of sea cucumbers to predation pressure shows their survival strategy in the natural environment, which is of great significance for the aquaculture of sea cucumbers. By monitoring the immune and antioxidant enzyme activities of sea cucumbers, their health status can be assessed, providing a scientific basis for disease prevention and aquaculture management, thereby improving breeding efficiency and survival rate.

Author Contributions

Methodology, W.K. and C.Z.; investigation, L.Q.; resources, M.W. and J.S.; writing—original draft, C.W.; writing—review and editing, Y.S. and S.W.; funding acquisition, Q.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Technology Foundation of Dalian Jinshiwan Laboratory (Dljswsf202402), the China Scholarship Council, Science and Technology Foundation of Dalian (2021YF16SN015, 2021JB11SN035), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFD2400305), and the Foundation of Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences (2024XKJS5249).

Institutional Review Board Statement

In our study, we utilized the sea cucumber (Apostichopus japonicus) as the experimental material. According to the regulations of our institution and relevant laws and regulations, formal approval from an ethics committee or institutional review board is not required for experiments involving this type of non-vertebrate animal.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the submitted article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Xi Xie for his valuable suggestions in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bell, J.D.; Munro, J.L.; Nash, W.J.; Rothlisberg, P.C.; Loneragan, N.R.; Ward, R.D.; Andrew, N.L. Restocking and stock enhancement of marine invertebrate fisheries. Adv. Mar. Biol. 2005, 49, xi-374. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gosselin, L.A.; Qian, P.Y. Juvenile mortality in benthic marine invertebrates. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1997, 146, 265–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Francour, P. Predation on holothurians: A literature review. Invertebr. Biol. 1997, 116, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yu, Z.; Yang, H.; Hamel, J.F. Larval, juvenile, and adult predators. The Sea Cucumber Apostichopus japonicus: History, Biology and Aquaculture; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 243–256. [Google Scholar]
  5. Garm, A. Sensory biology of starfish-with emphasis on recent discoveries in their visual ecology. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2017, 57, 1082–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Boonstra, R. Reality as the leading cause of stress: Rethinking the impact of chronic stress in nature. Funct. Ecol. 2013, 27, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Campbell, A.C.; Coppard, S.; Tudor-Tomas, C.D. Escape and aggregation responses of three echinoderms to conspecific stimuli. Biol. Bull. 2001, 201, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chi, X.; Hu, F.; Qin, C.; Huang, X.; Zhao, C. Conspecific alarm cues are a potential effective barrier to regulate foraging behavior of the sea urchin Mesocentrotus nudus. Mar. Environ. Res. 2021, 171, 105476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chi, X.; Yang, M.; Hu, F.; Huang, X.; Zhao, C. Foraging behavior of the sea urchin Mesocentrotus nudus exposed to conspecific alarm cues in various conditions. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 15654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhadan, P.; Vaschenk, M. Long-term study of behaviors of two cohabiting sea urchin species, Mesocentrotus nudus and Strongylocentrotus intermedius, under conditions of high food quantity and predation risk in situ. PeerJ 2019, 7, e8087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hamel, J.F.; Jobson, S.; Caulier, G.; Mercier, A. Evidence of anticipatory immune and hormonal responses to predation risk in an echinoderm. Sci. Rep. 2020, 11, 10691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Burnovicz, A.; Oliva, D.; Hermitte, G. The cardiac response of the crab Chasmagnathus granulatus as an index of sensory perception. J. Exp. Biol. 2009, 212, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, F. Progresses in research on defence mechanism of echinodems. J. DaLian Fish. Univ. 2005, 20, 340–344. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Ye, H.B.; Fan, Y.; Li, T.B.; Li, L.; Wang, X.L. Study progress on immunity defense mechanism of Apostichopus japonicus. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. 2018, 46, 27–29. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, G.; Ren, L.; Sun, G.; Yang, J.; Wei, X.; Liu, Z.; Li, S.; Jiang, H. Effects of hypoxic stress on oxidative stress Indices in Apostichopus japonicus. Prog. Fish. Sci. 2016, 37, 133–139. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. Thompson, R.F.; Spencer, W.A. Habituation: A model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior. Psychol. Rev. 1966, 73, 16–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wright, A.; Hill, L. Nearshore Marine Resources of the South Pacific: Information for Fisheries Development, Management; Institute of Pacific Studies Forum Fisheries Agency International Centre for Ocean Development: Suva, Fiji, 1993; pp. 371–401. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hatanaka, H.; Uwaoku, H.; Yasuda, T. Experimental studies on the predation of juvenile sea cucumber, Apostichopus japonicus by sea star, Asterina pectinifera. Suisanzoshoku 1994, 42, 563–566. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sui, X. The status and prospects for artificial breeding and enhancement of sea cucumber, Apostichopus japonicus (Selenka). Mod. Fish. Inf. 1996, 1–4. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  20. Liao, Y. Zoology of China: Echinodermata: Sea Cucumbers; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu, S. Handbook of Aquaculture Seedling Breeding Techniques; China Agricultural Press: Beijing, China, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  22. Tanaka, M. Diminution of sea cucumber Stichopus japonicus juveniles released on artificial reefs. Bull. Ishikawa Prefect. Fish. Res. Cent. 2000, 2, 19–29. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kang, K.H.; Kim, J.M. The predation of trumpet shell, Charonia sp., on eight different marine invertebrate species. Aquac. Res. 2004, 35, 1202–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, L.; Cao, Z.; Wan, C.; Xin, M.; Lu, B. Factors affecting the survival rate of Apostichopus japonicus in pond culture and their solutions. Chin. Fish. 2007, 10, 30–31. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  25. Uekusa, R.; Yoshida, N.; Kashio, S.; Tokaji, H. Low discovery rate of sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus juveniles after seed release in the field. Bull. Fish. Sci. 2012, 62, 43–49. [Google Scholar]
  26. Jiang, H.; Liu, Y.; Xin, X.; Yu, L.; Zhang, X. Starfish (Asterina pectinifera), an enemy of sea cucumbers. Shandong Fish. 2008, 25, 22–23. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  27. Tort, L. Stress and immune modulation in fish. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2011, 35, 1366–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Öhman, A. Fear and anxiety: Overlaps and dissociations. In Handbook of Emotions; The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 709–728. [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, L.; Tian, X.; Yu, X.; Dong, S. Effects of acute and chronic heavy metal (Cu, Cd, and Zn) exposure on sea cucumbers (Apostichopus japonicus). BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 4532697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Canicatti, C.R.; Parrinello, N. Studies on Holothuria polii (Echinodermata) antibacterial proteins. I. Evidence for and activity of a coelomocyte lysozyme. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 1989, 45, 756–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zheng, H.; Li, B.; Rong, X.; Liao, M.; Chen, G.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Zou, A. Effects of salinity and dissolved oxygen variation on the nonspecific immune response of Apostichopus japonicus. Prog. Fish. Sci. 2014, 30, 118–124. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  32. Han, S.; Zhao, B.; Li, C.; Hu, W.; Liu, Z. Effeets of acute pH stress on immunity enzyme of sea cucumber, Apostichopus japonicus. J. Fujian Agric. For. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2020, 49, 666–670. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xing, J.; Lin, T.; Zhan, W. Variations of enzyme activities in the haemocytes of scallop Chlamys farreri after infection with the acute virus necrobiotic virus (AVNV). Fish. Shellfish Immunol. 2008, 25, 847–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rajalakshmi, S.; Mohandas, A. Copper-induced changes in tissue enzyme activity in a freshwater mussel. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2005, 62, 140–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Song, X.; Zhang, L.; Gao, W.; Pan, B. Effect of Vibrio anguillarum on activity of phosphatase in Cyclina sinensis. Oceanol. Limnol. Sin. 2010, 41, 254–258. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  36. Pipe, R.K.; Porte, C.; Livingstone, D.R. Antioxidant enzymes associated with the blood cells and hemolymph of the mussel. Mytilus edulis. Fish. Shellfish Immunol. 1993, 3, 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sun, J.; Bai, Y. Predator-induced stress influences fall armyworm immune response to inoculating bacteria. Invertebr. Pathol. 2020, 172, 107352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hoetzel, A.; Park, J.W.; Nakahira, K.; Wang, X.; Choi, A.M.K.; Ryter, S.W.; Kim, H.P. Mechanisms of cell death in oxidative stress. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2007, 9, 49–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Elstner, E.F. Oxygen activation and oxygen toxicity. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1982, 33, 73–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, K.; Tian, H. Researh and functon of catalase in organism. Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 8–11. [Google Scholar]
  41. Del, R.D.; Stewart, A.J.; Pellegrini, N. A review of recent studies on malondialdehyde as a toxic molecule and biological marker of oxidative stress. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovas 2005, 15, 316–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shi, H.; Sui, Y.; Wang, X.; Luo, Y.; Ji, L. Hydroxyl radical production and oxidative damage induced by cadmium and naphthalene in liver of Carassius auratus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2005, 140, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. dos Santos Carvalho, C.; Vanessa, A.B.; Heloísa, S.S.A.; Evaldo, L.G.E.; Marisa, N.F. Biomarker responses as indication of contaminant effects in Oreochromis niloticus. Chemosphere 2012, 89, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sun, Y.; Li, D.; Zhang, H.; Tian, B.; Ma, S.; Chen, X.; Wang, Q.; Du, X.; Xu, Y.; Javed, M.T. Dietary supplement of Antheraea pernyi cecropin enhances the growth rate and disease resistance of the Yesso scallop, Patinopecten yessoensis. Aquac. Rep. 2023, 31, 101634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xu, Y.J.; Sun, B. Effect of salinity stress on the growth, body composition and enzyme activities of juvenile Hippocsampus kuda. Oceanol. Limnol. Sin. 2012, 43, 1079–1285. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  46. Zang, Y.; Tian, X.; Dong, S.; Dong, Y. Growth, metabolism and immune responses to evisceration and the regeneration of viscera in sea cucumber, Apostichopus japonicus. Aquaculture 2012, 358–359, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sha, F.; Chang, Y.Q.; Ding, J. Effects of two cooling modes of low temperature stress on antioxidant enzyme activities and malondiadehyde level in sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. J. Dalian Ocean Univ. 2015, 30, 25–29. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The starfish preys on a sea cucumber. The red circle indicates the prey sea cucumber. (a) The sea cucumber is wrapped by the tube feet of the starfish. (b) The starfish everts its stomach to wrap the sea cucumber. (c) The starfish digests the sea cucumber.
Figure 1. The starfish preys on a sea cucumber. The red circle indicates the prey sea cucumber. (a) The sea cucumber is wrapped by the tube feet of the starfish. (b) The starfish everts its stomach to wrap the sea cucumber. (c) The starfish digests the sea cucumber.
Fishes 09 00337 g001
Figure 2. Changes in lysozyme activity in Apostichopus japonicus under the three types of predation pressure. 0: control; I: direct predation pressure; II: indirect predation pressure; III: the pressure of information release from injured conspecifics. n = 3.
Figure 2. Changes in lysozyme activity in Apostichopus japonicus under the three types of predation pressure. 0: control; I: direct predation pressure; II: indirect predation pressure; III: the pressure of information release from injured conspecifics. n = 3.
Fishes 09 00337 g002
Figure 3. Changes in acid phosphatase activity in Apostichopus japonicus under the three types of predation pressure. 0: control; I: direct predation pressure; II: indirect predation pressure; III: the pressure of information release from injured conspecifics. n = 3, different letters indicate significant differences among the different groups, P < 0.05.
Figure 3. Changes in acid phosphatase activity in Apostichopus japonicus under the three types of predation pressure. 0: control; I: direct predation pressure; II: indirect predation pressure; III: the pressure of information release from injured conspecifics. n = 3, different letters indicate significant differences among the different groups, P < 0.05.
Fishes 09 00337 g003
Figure 4. Changes in alkaline phosphatase activity of sea cucumber under the three types of predation pressure. 0: control; I: direct predation pressure; II: indirect predation pressure; III: the pressure of information release from injured conspecifics. n = 3, different letters indicate significant differences among the different groups, P < 0.05.
Figure 4. Changes in alkaline phosphatase activity of sea cucumber under the three types of predation pressure. 0: control; I: direct predation pressure; II: indirect predation pressure; III: the pressure of information release from injured conspecifics. n = 3, different letters indicate significant differences among the different groups, P < 0.05.
Fishes 09 00337 g004
Figure 5. CAT activity changes in sea cucumber under the three types of predation pressure. 0: control; I: direct predation pressure; II: indirect predation pressure; III: the pressure of information release from injured conspecifics. n = 3, different letters indicate significant differences among the different groups, P < 0.05.
Figure 5. CAT activity changes in sea cucumber under the three types of predation pressure. 0: control; I: direct predation pressure; II: indirect predation pressure; III: the pressure of information release from injured conspecifics. n = 3, different letters indicate significant differences among the different groups, P < 0.05.
Fishes 09 00337 g005
Figure 6. Changes in SOD activity in sea cucumber under the three types of predation pressure. 0: control; I: direct predation pressure; II: indirect predation pressure; III: the pressure of information release from injured conspecifics. n = 3, different letters indicate significant differences among the different groups, P < 0.05.
Figure 6. Changes in SOD activity in sea cucumber under the three types of predation pressure. 0: control; I: direct predation pressure; II: indirect predation pressure; III: the pressure of information release from injured conspecifics. n = 3, different letters indicate significant differences among the different groups, P < 0.05.
Fishes 09 00337 g006
Figure 7. Changes in MDA content in sea cucumber under the three types of predation pressure. 0: control; I: direct predation pressure; II: indirect predation pressure; III: the pressure of information release from injured conspecifics. n = 3, different letters indicate significant differences among the different groups, P < 0.05.
Figure 7. Changes in MDA content in sea cucumber under the three types of predation pressure. 0: control; I: direct predation pressure; II: indirect predation pressure; III: the pressure of information release from injured conspecifics. n = 3, different letters indicate significant differences among the different groups, P < 0.05.
Fishes 09 00337 g007
Table 1. Detection methods for the test enzymes.
Table 1. Detection methods for the test enzymes.
EnzymesAbbreviationTest Method (Kit Cargo No.)
LysozymeLZMA050, turbidimetry
Acid phosphataseACPA060-1, spectrophotometry
Alkaline phosphataseAKPA059-1, visible-light colorimetry
CatalaseCATA007-1, visible-light method
Superoxide dismutaseSODA001-1, hydroxylamine method
MalondialdehydeMDAA003-1, TBA method
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, C.; Wang, M.; Kang, W.; Qu, L.; Song, J.; Zhao, C.; Wang, Q. Impact of Starfish Predatory Pressure on the Immune and Antioxidant Functions of Sea Cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. Fishes 2024, 9, 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9090337

AMA Style

Sun Y, Wang S, Wang C, Wang M, Kang W, Qu L, Song J, Zhao C, Wang Q. Impact of Starfish Predatory Pressure on the Immune and Antioxidant Functions of Sea Cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. Fishes. 2024; 9(9):337. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9090337

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Yongxin, Shuo Wang, Chong Wang, Meng Wang, Wenbin Kang, Liang Qu, Jian Song, Chong Zhao, and Qingzhi Wang. 2024. "Impact of Starfish Predatory Pressure on the Immune and Antioxidant Functions of Sea Cucumber Apostichopus japonicus" Fishes 9, no. 9: 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9090337

APA Style

Sun, Y., Wang, S., Wang, C., Wang, M., Kang, W., Qu, L., Song, J., Zhao, C., & Wang, Q. (2024). Impact of Starfish Predatory Pressure on the Immune and Antioxidant Functions of Sea Cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. Fishes, 9(9), 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9090337

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop