Next Article in Journal
Assessments of 12 Commercial Species Stocks in a Subtropical Upwelling Ecosystem Using the CMSY and BSM Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Vitamin A in Fish Well-Being: Integrating Immune Strength, Antioxidant Capacity and Growth
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of the Toxic Dinoflagellate Protoceratium reticulatum on Physiological Rates of Juvenile Scallops Argopecten purpuratus

by
María Gabriela Nieves
1,
Gonzalo Alvarez
2,3,4,5,*,
Jesús Antonio López-Carvallo
2,
Paulina Millanao
2,
Michael Araya
3,
Rosario Díaz
2 and
Patricio A. Díaz
6
1
Programa de Doctorado en Acuicultura, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2340025, Chile
2
Departamento de Acuicultura, Universidad Católica del Norte, Coquimbo 1281, Chile
3
Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico en Algas (CIDTA), Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad Católica del Norte, Larrondo 1281, Coquimbo, Chile
4
Center for Ecology and Sustainable Management of Oceanic Islands (ESMOI), Departamento de Biología Marina, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad Católica del Norte, Coquimbo 1781421, Chile
5
Centro de Innovación Acuícola AQUAPACIFICO, Larrondo 1281, Coquimbo, Chile
6
Centro i~mar & CeBiB, Universidad de Los Lagos, Casilla 557, Puerto Montt, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fishes 2024, 9(9), 331; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9090331
Submission received: 24 July 2024 / Revised: 16 August 2024 / Accepted: 20 August 2024 / Published: 23 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Environment and Climate Change)

Abstract

Protoceratium reticulatum, a dinoflagellate species known for producing yessotoxins (YTX), can form harmful algal blooms (HABs) impacting marine life. This study examined how P. reticulatum influenced the physiological rates and affected the tissue health of juvenile scallops, Argopecten purpuratus. The scallops were exposed to non-toxic algae Isochrysis galbana (diet A) and mixtures where 30 and 70% of the non-toxic algae were replaced by the toxic algae P. reticulatum (diet B and C, respectively) for 15 days, followed by a 15-day recovery period (I. galbana). Results showed that the clearance rate (CR), inorganic ingestion rate (IIR), organic ingestion rate (OIR), and absorption rate (AR) were significantly reduced within the first seven days of exposure to toxic diets, with reductions of approximately 25% and 50% in diets B and C, respectively, compared to the non-toxic diet, and an increase in these parameters during the recovery stage. Histological observations revealed greater tissue damage in the digestive gland than in the gills, with a higher frequency of scallops with severe damage correlating with higher toxic diet content. Despite no direct impact on survival, the compromised physiological health of A. purpuratus juveniles suggests increased vulnerability to other stressors. These findings provide new insights into the filter-feeding behavior and selective filtration capabilities of scallops in the presence of toxic dinoflagellates and how scallops health can be compromised, contributing to the understanding of how HABs and associated toxins affect A. purpuratus.
Key Contribution: Feeding on diets containing P. reticulatum significantly reduced the clearance rate, organic ingestion rate, inorganic ingestion rate, and absorption rate in the first seven days, with an apparent recovery occurring thereafter. P. reticulatum does not cause mortality in A. purpuratus juveniles but leads to tissue damage that can compromise their health and increase their vulnerability to stressors.

1. Introduction

Protoceratium reticulatum (Claparède and Lachmann) Bütschli 1885 is a marine dinoflagellate species that is distributed worldwide (reviewed by Paz et al. [1], Paz et al. [2], Wang et al. [3]). These species can produce toxic harmful algal blooms associated with their ability to synthesize lipophilic toxins, including yessotoxin (YTX) and its analogs [3,4]. In addition to P. reticulatum, other dinoflagellates such as Lingulaulax polyedra comb. nov. (Lingulodinium polyedra) [2,5], Gonyaulax spinifera [6,7,8], and Gonyaulax taylorii [9] are also known to produce YTXs.
YTX is a marine polyether compound that was initially isolated from the marine scallop Patinopecten yessoensis in Japan in 1986 [10]. Since its discovery, numerous analogs and derivatives have been described in P. reticulatum [11] and several shellfish species. These toxins were originally classified under the diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP) group due to their presence in shellfish causing gastroenteritis in humans [12,13]. However, toxicological studies in mice have shown that these toxins, when administered intraperitoneally or orally, do not induce diarrhea or affect protein phosphatase activity [14,15]. Furthermore, the intraperitoneal administration of YTXs, and to a lesser extent the oral administration, has been linked to cardiotoxic effects in mice [12,13], as well as other effects at the cellular and molecular levels [15,16,17,18,19]. Although there have been no reported cases of human intoxication [20], the toxic effects led European authorities to set a regulatory limit of 3.75 mg/kg of YTX equivalents to ensure shellfish safety for human consumption [21]. This regulation may vary according to the regulation of each country, as shown in New Zealand, where it was deregulated.
The toxic dinoflagellate P. reticulatum can produce harmful algal blooms (HABs) in diverse regions globally. It has been connected to mass die-offs of marine species in South Africa, such as clams (Donax serra) and mussels (Choromytilus meridionalis and Aulacomya atra) [22,23]. Pitcher et al. [24] reported the death of millions of farmed abalone in South Africa due to a severe summer bloom of the toxic dinoflagellates L. polyedra (max. 1.6 × 105 cells L−1) and G. spinifera (max. 6.11 × 105 cells L−1). Rogers-Bennett et al. [25] reported a massive mortality associated with YTX of the abalone (Haliotis rufescens) in the natural environment of the California Coast, USA. Jurgens et al. [26] reported a severe mortality event, likely caused by a toxic bloom of Gonyaulax spp., which impacted the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus and the starfish Leptasterias sp., resulting in nearly 99% mortality across approximately 100 km of the California coastline.
The specific mechanism by which YTX toxicity affects bivalves remains unclear [27]. In Mytilus galloprovincialis, YTX has been found primarily in circulating immunocytes and the digestive gland, particularly within the lumen of tubules and ducts, suggesting its presence in the gills as well [28,29]. Similarly, King et al. [27] observed significant damage to the digestive gland of clams (Venerupis philippinarum) during a mass stranding linked to a P. reticulatum bloom, with toxicity levels measured between 0.09 and 0.27 mg Eq. YTX kg−1. Studies assessing histological analysis in marine mollusks to understand the effects of YTX are scarce, but some have reported tissue damage in the gill and digestive gland [24,27]. In the clam V. philippinarum, abnormalities in the digestive gland tubules, such as a reduction in tubule height and the sloughing of epithelial cells, have been observed following exposure to the toxic dinoflagellate P. reticulatum, which produces YTX [27]. Additionally, in the abalone Haliotis rufescens, the presence of YTX has been reported to impact the gill epithelium, leading to the degeneration and necrosis of epithelial cells, along with a mild inflammatory response [24]. Tissue damage may be caused by YTX’s negative impact on the cytoskeleton, particularly on actin filaments and cadherin transmembrane proteins [28,30]. Additionally, it is possible that the damage is related to cell death through the apoptotic process [31,32].
In Chile, a country with a coastline extending over 4000 km, P. reticulatum and YTX have been reported in widely separated locations [33]. YTX was first detected in southern Chile in the mussel Mytilus chilensis from the Chonos Archipelago (43 °S) [34], where P. reticulatum was identified as the main producer of YTX in the area. Likewise, [35] associated the presence of P. reticulatum with a high content of YTXs (9.4 to 52.2 pg cell−1) in Puyuhuapi Fjord, NW Patagonia. In northern Chile, YTX was initially detected in phytoplankton samples from Bahía Arica (18 °S), where it was proposed that P. reticulatum was the source [36]. Subsequently, Alvarez et al. [37] confirmed YTX presence in phytoplankton samples from a dense bloom of P. reticulatum (approximately 350 cells mL−1) in Bahía Mejillones (23 °S) and identified this species as the primary YTX producer in the region. During this event, the high mortality of juvenile scallop Argopecten purpuratus (12 ± 2 mm) from aquaculture facilities was reported for the first time.
Since then, there have been no other reports of mass mortalities in marine invertebrates until January 2019, when a massive beaching of clams (Ameghinomya antiqua) and echinoderms, including the red urchin (Loxechinus albus) and the star (Stichaster striatus), occurred on the coast of Pabellón de Pica in the Tarapacá Region. This event was associated with low concentrations of YTX (0.1–0.4 mg YTX kg−1) [38]. Two weeks later, a mass stranding of approximately 12 tons of Humboldt squid (Dosidicus gigas) was observed in Bahia Inglesa, Atacama Region, with toxin concentrations of 0.42 mg YTX kg−1 recorded in their visceral tissues. A similar event occurred at the end of March 2019, when 130 tons of Humboldt squid were stranded in Puerto Aldea, Coquimbo Region, with a YTX concentration of 0.12 mg YTX kg−1 [38].
The scallop Argopecten purpuratus is an endemic species on the Pacific coast of South America, where it is found from Paita (5 °S) in northern Peru to Valparaíso (33 °S) in Chile [39,40]. It is a key commercial species in international markets, including Spain, Belgium, and Brazil, prized for its high nutritional value [41], large size, rapid growth, and high price [42,43,44,45].
Although several toxic outbreaks of the dinoflagellate P. reticulatum and/or the presence of YTX have been detected in different locations in Northern Chile, causing massive mortality in marine invertebrates and probably in juveniles of A. purpuratus, no information is available on the effects of the toxic dinoflagellate in this important aquaculture species from the Pacific coast of South America. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of toxic P. reticulatum on the physiological rates of A. purpuratus juveniles.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Animals

Juvenile Argopecten purpuratus (height: 29.8 ± 4.0 mm) were obtained from the Laboratorio Central de Cultivos Marinos at Universidad Católica del Norte, Chile. Prior to the experiment, the scallops were acclimated for one week in 14 L aquariums containing filtered seawater, with constant aeration, a temperature of 15 °C, and a salinity of 34. They were fed Isochrysis galbana, with the daily ration set at 3% of the scallop dry weight. This amount, calculated based on the average weight of 25 mm juveniles, was equivalent to 3.06 mg per individual per day.

2.2. Culture of Protoceratium reticulatum and Isochrysis galbana

The diet comprised two species: the haptophyte Isochrysis galbana and the toxic dinoflagellate Protoceratium reticulatum. I. galbana was cultured in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks with 200 mL of f/2 medium [46], maintained under controlled conditions at 20 ± 1 °C, a salinity of 34 ± 1, an irradiance of 50 μmol m−2 s−1, and a 12:12 h light/dark cycle. For the toxic diet, monoclonal P. reticulatum (PRIEM strain) was cultured in batch conditions in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks with 150 mL of L1 medium [47], under similar controlled conditions at 20 ± 1 °C, a salinity of 28 ± 1, an irradiance of 50 μmol m−2 s−1, and a 12:12 h light/dark cycle. Each culture was maintained until the mid-exponential phase, and the cell density (cells mL−1) was estimated using a CKX41 inverted microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and Neubauer counting chamber (Paul Marienfeld GmBH & Co, Lauda-Königshofen, Germany) for I. galbana and a Sedgewick-Rafter counting chamber for P. reticulatum.

2.3. Experimental Design

To estimate the toxic effect of P. reticulatum on the physiological rates of scallop juveniles, three treatments based on toxic and non-toxic diets were established. The amount of diet was estimated to supplement a daily amount of food equivalent to 3% of its dry weight (Table 1). Each treatment was carried out in triplicate in 14 L aquariums containing 54 individuals maintained in filtered seawater with constant aeration, at 16 °C, and at a salinity of 34. The diets were delivered continuously using a peristaltic pump (Lead Fluid BT100S-1) for 15 d (intoxication period). After this period, all treatments were fed a non-toxic diet containing 100% I. galbana for 15 days.
Physiological rates were measured in triplicate, taking random individuals from each experimental aquarium on days 0 (first day of the intoxication period), 2, 7, 11, and 15 (intoxication period) and on days 16, 22, 25, and 30 (detoxification period). For the experiments, one individual was placed in a 250 mL beaker (experimental chamber) with filtered seawater (0.45 µm) (closed system), with a final volume of 200 mL, and their corresponding diet. After completing the physiological determinations, the individuals were dissected, and the total weight (including the shell) and weight of the soft tissues were recorded using an electronic balance ScoutTM Pro (0.1 g) (Ohaus Corporation, Parsippany, NJ, USA). From the dissected tissues, one portion (2 mm cross section) of the digestive gland and gill from each organism were placed in histological cassettes Leica Jet II (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and fixed in Davidson’s solution for 48 h for histological analysis. Additionally, the shell length was measured using a Vernier (0.01 mm).

2.4. Clearance Rate

For the individual experiments to determine the physiological rates, the particle concentration constituting the diets was estimated considering the amount of food (0.06 mg) that one individual required for feeding each 30 min. Cells (particles) corresponding to the different diets were controlled every 30 min for 3 h. Each 30 min period, a 15 mL sample was taken, fixed with Lugol iodine solution, and stored in a dark place. Subsequently, these samples were quantified using Neubauer counting chambers (for counting I. galbana) and a Sedgwick-Rafter chamber (for counting P. reticulatum) under an optical microscope. The clearance rate was estimated using the following equation [48]:
C R   L h = ln C b ln C e t V
where CR is the clearance rate (L h−1), Cb is the initial concentration of microalgae (cells mL−1), Ce is the final concentration of microalgae (cells mL−1), V is the total volume of seawater (L), and t is the time of the experiment.

2.5. Ingestion Rates

The ingestion rate was estimated by taking three samples of 100 mL for each diet. Each sample was concentrated on GF/C glass fiber filters (47 mm; 1.2 µm) (Microclar, Buenos Aires, Argentina) that had been previously washed, ashed, and weighed. The blank filters and filter-retained diet were rinsed with an isotonic solution of ammonium formate (3.4%) to eliminate salts and avoid cell lysis. To estimate the inorganic and organic content of the diets (mg L−1), the filters were dried at 50 °C for one week in an oven (VMTECH 101-3AB, Wincom Company Ltd, Hunan, China) and then weighed using an analytical balance (BOECO BAS 31 plus, 0.0001 g) (BOECO, Germany). They were then ashed at 450 °C for 5 h in a muffle furnace (VMTECH TC-5-12, Wincom Company Ltd, Hunan, China) and reweighed after cooling in a desiccator. The inorganic ingestion rate (IRR) and the organic ingestion rate (OIR) were calculated according to the equations described by Bayne et al. [49]:
I I R m g h = C R L h × i n o r g a n i c   m a t e r i a l   ( m g L )
O I R m g h = C R L h × o r g a n i c   m a t e r i a l   ( m g L )
where IIR is the inorganic ingestion rate (mg h−1), OIR is the organic ingestion rate (mg h−1), and CR is the clearance rate (L h−1).

2.6. Absorption Efficiency

Absorption efficiency was determined by taking three samples of 50 mL of each diet and recollecting all feces accumulated during the clearance rate experiments. Both samples were concentrated on GF/C glass fiber filters (47 mm; 1.2 µm), and the weights of inorganic and organic matter were estimated following the same methodology used to determine the ingestion rates. Calculations to determine the absorption efficiency (EA) were carried out according to the equations described by Conover [50]:
A E = A F 1 F × A
where AE is the absorption efficiency, A is the proportion of the weight of organic matter to the total weight of the diet, and F is the ratio of the weight of organic matter to the total weight of feces.

2.7. Absorption Rate

The absorption rate (AR) was estimated using the following equation from Bayne, et al. [49]:
A R   ( m g h ) = A E × O I R   ( m g h )
where AR is the absorption rate (mg h−1), AE is the absorption efficiency, and OIR is the organic ingestion rate (mg h−1).

2.8. Excretion Rate

The excretion rate was determined after 3 h using a 100 mL sample from each experimental chamber and were filtered using GF/C glass fiber filters (47 mm; 1.2 µm), then a 10 mL subsample was analyzed following the method of [51]. For this determination, a calibration curve was prepared with known concentrations of the ammonium sulfate stock solution. The samples were read using a UV/VIS spectrophotometer (Rayleigh, Beifen-Ruili, China) at a wavelength of 640 nm. The equation described by [52] was used to calculate the excretion rate:
E R = 28 × X × V t
where ER is the excretion rate (μg NH4-N·h−1), X is the ammonium concentration, V is the total volume of seawater (L), t is the duration of the experiment, and 28 is the conversion factor of μM to μg NH4-N.

2.9. Toxin Analyses

The YTX content in juvenile scallop samples (n = 3) was determined during the intoxication period on days 0, 2, 5, 7, 11, and 15. Individuals were separately packed in sealed bags and frozen at −20 °C until analysis. YTXs were extracted from whole shellfish tissues following the methodology described by the European Union Reference Laboratory for Marine Biotoxins [53].
The presence of YTX and homo-yessotoxin (homo-YTX) in the extract was determined using a method adapted from Regueiro et al. [54]. Instrumental analysis was conducted with a Dionex UltiMate 3000 UHPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), utilizing a reversed-phase HPLC column Gemini NX-C18 (50 mm × 2 mm; 3 μm) with an Ultra Guard column C18 (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). The flow rate was 0.35 mL min−1, and the injection volume was 10 μL. The mobile phase was run in gradient mode as follows: 81% eluent A (100% water with 6.7 mM NH4OH) and 19% eluent B (90% acetonitrile: 10% water with 6.7 mM NH4OH) for 1 min, followed by a linear increase to 95% B over 5 min, maintained for 2 min, and then returned to initial conditions of 19% B. The column was then re-equilibrated for 5 min. YTX and homo-YTX were detected with a Q Exactive Focus mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) equipped with a HESI II electrospray interface. The HESI was operated in negative ionization mode with a spray voltage of 3 kV and in positive ionization mode with a spray voltage of 3.5 kV. The ion transfer tube and HESI vaporizer temperatures were set to 200 °C and 350 °C, respectively. Nitrogen (>99.98%) was used as the sheath and auxiliary gas at pressures of 30 and 4 arbitrary units, respectively. Data were acquired in a selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode for quantification and a data-dependent (ddMS2) mode for confirmation. The analysis was conducted using a mass inclusion list with precursor ion masses, expected retention times, and collision energies (CE) for each toxin. In the SIM mode, the masses were set to 570.2330 m/z for YTX and to 577.2396 m/z for homo-YTX, with a scan range of m/z 100–1000, a mass resolution of 35,000, automatic gain control (AGC) at 2 × 105, and a maximum injection time (IT) of 3000 ms. In the ddMS2 mode, the mass resolution was 70,000, AGC was 2 × 105, and IT was 3000 ms, with an isolation window of 2 m/z for both modes. The toxin concentrations in the extracts were quantified by comparing the peak areas with those of certified reference materials from NCR, Canada. The method’s quantification limits were 6 ng mL−1 for YTX and 5 ng mL−1 for homo-YTX.

2.10. Histological Analysis

Histological analyses were performed in triplicate, taking random individuals from each experimental aquarium on days 0 (first day of the intoxication period), 15 (end of intoxication period), and 30 (end of detoxification period). Fixed tissues were dehydrated using an ascending ethanol gradient (70%, 80%, 95%, and 100%), cleared in xylene, embedded in paraffin (Paraplast X-Tra, McCormick, CA, USA), and sectioned into 4 µm slices. These sections were mounted on glass slides and stained with hematoxylin–eosin, following the procedure outlined by Kim et al. [55].
From each stained slide, the whole tissue was inspected using a Nikon eclipse light microscope (Nikon Instruments Inc., Japan). To record the tissue damage associated with YTX, three digital microphotographs of each tissue (digestive gland and gill) were captured at 20× using a Nikon DS-Fi3 camera (Nikon Instruments Inc., Tokyo, Japan). This information was used to determine the tissue damage grade in the digestive gland and gills. We established a five-level classification system to assess tissue damage across the entire slide as follows: unaffected (no damage), minimal (<25% damage), low (25–50% damage), moderate (50–75% damage), and severe (75% damage).

2.11. Statistical Analyses

The physiological rates, such as the clearance, ingestion, absorption efficiency, absorption rate, and excretion, of A. purpuratus juveniles exposed to different toxic diets were evaluated using the two-factor Permutation Test. This statistical approach was used because after applying conventional linear models (ANOVA), the residuals did not meet the basic assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity required for this type of model. The Permutation Test, developed by Fisher [56] and Pitman [57], assesses differences between groups when they do not meet previously mentioned assumptions. Additionally, an a posteriori test (PostHocTest) was applied using Scheffe’s method, which identifies significant differences between the groups. All analyses and graphic representations were performed using R 3.5.1 statistical and programming software (R Development Core Team, 2018) ‘Survival’ Therneau [58] and “lmPerm” packages Wheeler and Torchiano [59], available through the CRAN repository (www.r-project.org/, accessed on 12 May 2023).

3. Results

3.1. Clearance Rate

During the intoxication period, significant differences were observed in the clearance rate (CR) among the three diets (p < 0.05) (Figure 1). The highest values of CR correspond to the control group (diet A; 100% I. galbana) with a maximum of 0.65 ± 0.30 L h−1 on day 15 and an average of 0.56 ± 0.07 L h−1. Regarding scallops fed with diet B (30% P. reticulatum), a CR decrease by 17.85% was observed as compared with the control group with a minimum value of 0.40 ± 0.22 L h−1 on day 2 and an average of 0.46 ± 0.06 L h−1. For individuals fed diet C (70% P. reticulatum), the filtration rates were the lowest during this period, decreasing by 48.21% compared to the control group. The maximum value recorded corresponded to 0.41 ± 0.34 L h−1, whereas the average was 0.29 ± 0.08 L h−1.
In the detoxification stage, no significant differences were observed between the toxic diets (B and C) and control diet (p < 0.05) (Figure 1). The CR of the control group (A) remained relatively constant at an average of 0.62 ± 0.13 L h−1. In the case of individuals consuming diet B (30% P. reticulatum), the CR increased by 24.49% to 0.61 ± 0.3 L h−1 on the first day of detoxification; subsequently, it remains stable with an average of 0.56 ± 0.09 L h−1. With respect to diet C (70% P. reticulatum), the change in food to I. galbana notably increases the CR by 130.77%, reaching 0.60 ± 0.31 L h−1 during the first day of detoxification, and the rate then increases with a maximum of 0.84 ± 0.29 L h−1 on the 25th day.

3.2. Ingestion Rates

During the intoxication period, significant differences were reported in the inorganic ingestion rates (IIR) of the toxic diets (B and C) compared to the control diet (A) (p < 0.05) (Figure 2). The highest IIR values were observed in the control group (diet A), with a maximum of 1.76 ± 0.81 mg h−1 on day 15 and an average of 1.61 ± 0.18 mg h−1. In diet B, the IIR was reduced by 22.36% compared to the control diet, with a maximum of 1.48 ± 0.97 mg h−1 on the first day and an average of 1.25 ±0.18 mg h−1. For diet C, the IIR was the lowest during the intoxication period, decreasing by 52.79% compared with diet A. The maximum IIR value corresponded to 1.03 ± 0.84 mg h−1 on day 11, with an average of 0.76 ± 0.16 mg h−1.
During the detoxification period, significant differences were observed between the different diets (p < 0.05) (Figure 2). The average IIR of juveniles fed diet A was 2.34 ± 0.82 mg h−1. For diet B, the IRR increased from 125.19% to 2.95 ± 1.43 mg h−1, while the IRR in individuals fed with on diet C increase considerably by 318.84%, reaching an average of 2.42 ± 0,63 mg h−1.
During the intoxication period, significant differences were reported in the organic ingestion rates (OIR) of the toxic diets (B and C) compared to the control diet (A) (p < 0.05) (Figure 3). The OIR followed the trend of IIR, with the highest rate value for diet A corresponding to 1.62 ± 0.88 mg h−1. In individuals fed diet B, the OIR was reduced by 16.43% compared to the control diet (A), reaching an average value of 1.22 ± 0.26 mg h−1. Regarding diet C, the OIR was the lowest during this period, decreasing by 44.52% compared to that of the control, reaching an average value of 0.81 ± 0.23 mg h−1.
During the detoxification period, significant differences were observed between the different toxic diets (p < 0.05) (Figure 3). Juveniles fed diet A reached an average OIR value of 1.91 ± 0.47 mg h−1. The OIR of juveniles fed diet B increased by 105.55%, reaching an average of 1.77 ± 0.62 mg h−1. Finally, in diet C, the OIR increased by 106.84% to an average value of 2.05 ± 0.70 mg h−1.

3.3. Absorption Efficiency

No significant differences in absorption efficiency (AE) were observed between the toxic and control diets (p = 0.02537) (Figure 4). Similarly, in both periods, the AE values were similar between the diets. For the control diet (A), the minimum observed was 68.21 ± 3.56% and the maximum was 76.15 1± 1.77%, with an average of 72.24 + 2.36%. Regarding diet B, the minimum was 66.84 ± 6.70% and the maximum was 76.12 + 1.71%, with an average of 72.03 ± 3.02%. For diet C, the minimum value observed in absorption efficiency was 60.55 ± 7.82% and the maximum was 75.65 ± 1.75%, with an average of 69.03 ± 4.38%.

3.4. Absorption Rate

Significant differences were observed in the absorption rate (AR) between the control diet (A) and toxic diets (B and C) (p < 0.05) (Figure 5). The highest AR was reported in juveniles of the control group (diet A), with a maximum of 1.25 ± 0.19 mg h−1 on day 15 and an average of 1.10 ± 0.12 mg h−1. In the case of diet B, the AR decreased by 16.7% as compared to the control, with a maximum of 1.10 ± 0.21 mg h−1 on day 11 and an average of 0.92 ± 0.21 mg h−1. During the intoxication period, the AR was 52.06% lower than that of the control diet. For this treatment, the maximum AR corresponded to 0.84 ± 0.30 mg h−1, while the average was 0.54 ± 0.19 mg h−1.
During the detoxification period, there were no significant differences between the toxic diets (B and C) and control diet (A) (p = 0.05179) (Figure 5). The AR of the control diet (A) increased slightly, reaching an average value of 1.45 ± 0.31 mg h−1. In the case of individuals on diet B, the absorption rate increased by 45.65% to 1.34 ± 0.48 mg h−1, with an average of 0.92 ± 0.12 mg h−1. Regarding diet C, the change in non-toxic food notably increased the AR by 178.57%, reaching an average value of 1.42 ± 0.38 mg h−1.

3.5. Excretion Rate

During the intoxication period, no significant differences in excretion rates (ER) were observed between juveniles fed the control diet and those exposed to toxic diets (p = 0.0507) (Figure 6). During this period, the highest value obtained in the control group (diet A) was 53.85 ± 17.61 µg NH4 h−1 on day 11, with an average of 41.81 ± 9.82 µg NH4 h−1. Regarding juveniles fed with diet B, the maximum value observed was 69.35 + 20.81 µg NH4 h−1 for day 15, with an average of 50.73 ± 16.95 µg NH4 h−1. For diet C, the maximum value recorded corresponded to 60.63 ± 19.74 µg NH4 h−1, while the average was 49.45 ± 15.76 µg NH4 h−1.
In the detoxification period, no significant differences were observed between the toxic diets (p = 0.2227) (B and C), and the control diet (A) reached an average of 42.66 ± 6.53 µg NH4 h−1, while diet B has an average of 46.42 ± 8.08 µg NH4 h−1. Finally, diet C resulted in an average of 47.77 ± 7.07 µg NH4 h−1.

3.6. Toxin Analyses

No YTX was detected in individuals fed the control diet (Figure 7). Regarding diet B, individuals accumulated low concentrations of YTX during the toxicity period, reaching 2.47 ng g−1 on the second day of experimentation. Subsequently, no toxins were recorded on day 7, which increased quickly to 72 ng g−1 on day 11, and then decreased to values near 50 ng g−1. In the case of diet C, the concentration did not exceed 25 ng g−1 at the beginning of the intoxication period. Then, the concentration stabilized at day 5, increasing abruptly to 100 ng g−1 by day 7. After that, the concentration decreased to approximately 50 ng g−1 on day 15.

3.7. Histopathological Responses

Tissue damage was observed in the digestive glands and gills when the organisms were exposed to the toxic dinoflagellate P. reticulatum (Figure 8). Specifically, the digestive glands of the affected organisms showed tissue damage characterized by significant hemocyte infiltration, irregular and damaged digestive tubules with sloughing and disintegrating digestive cells, and a reduction in epithelial cell height in the digestive tubules. In the gills, damage is primarily associated with hemocyte migration, epithelial cell melanization, and the disintegration of epithelial cells. The percentage of affected tissue in the samples was evaluated to determine the extent of damage and record the level of affectation (unaffected, minimal, low, moderate, and severe damage) by organism for each experimental condition.
Significant variability in tissue damage levels was observed among individuals, affecting both the digestive gland and gills. A higher frequency of scallops with severe tissue damage in the digestive gland was registered in scallops fed diet B during T0 (40%) and those fed diet C at T15 and T30 (20 and 40%, respectively). Organisms with low and minimal tissue damage in the digestive gland were present in all treatments, and a higher frequency of organisms with minimal damage was observed in scallops fed diet A at T0 (100%). The tissue damage level in the gills was less evident than that in the digestive gland. At T0, scallops from diets B and C did not present tissular affectations (both 100%), and only those fed by control diet A presented a minimal percentage of organisms with minimal affectation (20%). During T15, only scallops fed diet C presented organisms with tissue damage in the gill, where all affected organisms presented moderate damage levels (40%). At the end of the recovery stage (T30), higher tissue damage in the gills was observed in organisms fed C (moderate: 40%; severe: 40%), followed by those fed diet B (moderate: 40%).

4. Discussion

The present study provides evidence that the clearance rate (CR), inorganic ingestion rate (IIR), organic ingestion rate (OIR), and absorption rate (AR) of A. purpuratus juveniles were significantly reduced when fed diets that included the toxic dinoflagellate P. reticulatum during the first seven days of exposure. In both diets B (30% P. reticulatum) and C (70% P. reticulatum), the CR, OIR, IIR, and AR were reduced by nearly 25 and 50% compared with the non-toxic diet (Isochrysis galbana). This reduction in CR or microalgal filtration has been highlighted previously in other scallop species exposed to toxic dinoflagellates [60,61,62]. In the scallop Pecten maximus, the filtration and respiration rates are reduced when organisms are exposed to the microalgae Alexandrium minutum for two days [60]; in contrast, juveniles of the scallop Nodipecten subnodosus have shown reduced feeding and increased pseudofeces production when exposed to the toxic dinoflagellate Gymnodinium catenatum, which produces paralytic shellfish toxins (PST) [63]. The same behavior has been reported in the scallops Pecten novaezelandiae in adults exposed to low concentrations of the toxic PST-producing dinoflagellate A. tamarense with lower CRs during the first three days of exposure [61]. The behavior modulating, filtering, and ingestion of microalgae caused by the addition of a toxic dinoflagellate suggests the ability of the scallop A. purpuratus to reject specific microalgae cells by selective feeding. This assumption is validated by the fact that scallops exposed to the toxic dinoflagellate accumulate lower amounts of YTX during the first five days, and the fact that scallops fed a toxic diet showing an increased CR, OIR, and IIR during the recovery stage (T30) were organisms from all diets fed by non-toxic microalgae (I. galbana). Low toxin accumulation has been observed in clams that close their shells when they are exposed to toxic algae [64]. This finding supports the idea that A. purpuratus can detect and reject P. reticulatum.
Selective feeding has previously been suggested for A. purpuratus. In the larval stage, some authors have suggested that organisms might selectively retain bacteria [65], and, in the adult stage, the pre-ingestive selection of food has been reported [66]. Perhaps selective feeding in marine bivalves is poorly understood. At least three mechanisms of selecting suspended particles have been reported: Preferential clearance on the ctenidia (e.g., selective removal of specific microalgae), (2) pre-ingestive selection by the labial palps (rejection through pseudofaeces), and (3) differential absorption in the gut [67,68]. Because the CR decreased and no pseudofeces were observed, we suggest that A. purpuratus preferentially filtrates non-toxic microalgae, rejecting P. reticulatum cells. The species-specific selection and avoidance of particular types of microalgae have been observed in clams Mercenaria mercenaria, Meretrix meretrix, and Ruditapes philippinarum [69]. In the scallop Argopecten irradians, the authors suggested that the organisms are able to recognize algal cells as non-self and non-food, avoiding the filtration of the toxic dinoflagellate Prorocentrum minimum [70]. Additionally, it has been reported that Mytilus edulis can distinguish algal food particles even when they are of similar size [71]. Similar observations have been reported in the tropical bivalve Lithophaga simplex, which selectively filtrates particles (bacteria and algae) despite their numerical dominance in plankton and their size [72]. Researchers have linked the selectivity of microalgae to the ctenidial architecture [67] and the interactions between the physicochemical properties of the particles and the mucus covering the pallial organs [67,72,73,74,75].
The filtration selectivity of A. purpuratus was supported by the fact that CR decreased and the ammonium excretion rate (ER) remained stable for scallops fed different diets. The ammonium ER can be related to the food consumption of the organisms. In marine bivalves, when organisms stop feeding, the rate of ammonia excretion is reduced [76]. In contrast, Navarro and Contreras [77] reported that in the mussel Mytilus chilensis, ammonia excretion is increased when organisms are exposed to the toxic dinoflagellate A. catenella for eight days due to the degradation of PSTs. However, the ER of A. purpuratus exposed to toxic algae was the same as that of the control. In this context, our findings suggest that the ammonium rate did not differ among organisms, as they maintained feeding on the non-toxic algae (I. galbana) provided. This highlights the species’ ability to adapt its metabolism to the different experimental diets tested in this study. The mechanism behind this detection still unknown and requires further validation and exploration [78]. It is important to note that there is a lack of understanding of the mechanisms related to avoiding the filtration of toxic or harmful microalgae. However, we hypothesize that the ctenidum or labial palps may be important organs containing receptors that may control filtration behavior.
Even lower CRs, OIRs, and IIRs were reported in scallops fed diets B and C during the first seven days of exposure to toxic algae, after which the organisms slightly increased these parameters. The same scenario has been reported for the scallop P. novaezelandiae. The authors reported that scallops reduced clearance rates when exposed to toxic PSTs produced by the dinoflagellate A. tamarense during the first three days and increased clearance rates before day six [61]. In our study, the increase in the CR, OIR, and IIR after day seven in scallops fed with toxic diets B and C was attributed to the loss of functionality of organs related to toxic algae detection caused by tissular damage that may have affected microalgae selectivity if recognition mechanisms are attributed to gill and pallial organs reported by other authors [72,73,74,75]. Organisms exposed to the toxic dinoflagellate in this study presented tissue damage in the digestive gland and gill, attributed to the presence of YTX. In the digestive gland, tissue damage is associated with significant hemocyte infiltration, irregular and damaged digestive tubules with sloughing and disintegrating digestive cells, and a reduction in epithelial cell height in the digestive tubules. In the gills, damage is primarily associated with hemocyte migration, epithelial cell melanization, and the disintegration of epithelial cells. Similar tissue damage has been observed in different shellfish species exposed to toxic dinoflagellates, associated with toxins produced by different toxic algae [24,70]. In A. irradians, the toxic dinoflagellate P. minimum has been associated with the sloughing of digestive cells from the digestive tubule epithelia and the migration of hemocytes to the stomach and intestine [70].
In the abalone Haliotis midae, exposure to YTX led to severe damage to the gill and external epithelia, characterized by a significant loss of cell adhesion [24]. The loss of functionality in the digestive gland caused by YTX has been reported in the abalone H. discus hannai, which damages the metabolic and digestive physiological activities [79]. These results suggest that the loss of function of these organs may be related to the observed physiological changes in scallops exposed to P. reticulatum in this study.
Cellular lysis and tissue damage in the gill and digestive gland caused by toxins in mollusks, particularly YTX, have been associated with the induction of oxidative stress (increases in reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxidation), the disruption of the antioxidant and defense systems, reduction in digestive physiological activity, and apoptosis mediated by caspase proteins [27,32,79,80]. Both the digestive glands and gills are tissues vulnerable to oxidative stress and apoptosis when exposed to toxic substances [81]. This susceptibility explains the observed tissue damage in A. purpuratus when exposed to P. reticulatum. Additionally, the loss of tissue function may indicate that the scallops’ recovery of CR is hindered while still exposed to the toxic dinoflagellate. The suggested loss of the ability to detect toxic algae cells caused by YTX was also supported by the increase in YTX content in A. purpuratus juveniles after day seven when the CR increased. Interestingly, during the recovery stage, the number of scallops with severe tissue damage increased, reflecting the presence of the toxin. In scallops, the digestible gland is an important energetic reserve tissue that stores lipids [82], and YTXs is a lipid-soluble toxin [80]; the tissular damage seen in the recovery stage of the scallops exposed to P. reticulatum was associated with remnant toxins contained in the digestible gland trapped in lipidic storage reserves that remain affecting tissues of the organ.
In this study, the massive infiltration of hemocytes was observed in the digestible gland and gill of scallops exposed to P. reticulatum. The migration of hemocytes through the epithelia into the alimentary tract, including the stomach and intestines, has been observed in A. irradians irradians exposed to the toxic dinoflagellate Prorocentrum minimum [70]. These authors reported the encapsulation of toxic algae by hemocytes, suggesting the recognition of the toxic dinoflagellate. Hégaret et al. [83] also reported hemocyte migration to the alimentary tract in Manila clams exposed to P. minimum. Similarly, in Mytilus edulis, hemocytes were observed migrating into the stomach and intestines following exposure to P. minimum [84]. The migration of hemocytes has been attributed to the elimination of harmful algal cells and toxin removal. It has been suggested that hemocyte cells in M. edulis can detect P. minimum cells as parasites [84]. Additionally, the presence of YTX has been observed in the hemocytes of the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis [29]. Hemocytes are versatile cells that carry out several crucial physiological functions, such as nutrient digestion, transportation and distribution, wound healing, detoxification, shell mineralization, and excretion [85]. Among these functions, the recognition of non-self molecules is one of the most important [86,87], including the detection of toxic dinoflagellates and toxins [29,84,86,87,88]. In this context, the detection of dinoflagellates and toxins is feasible, and whether this recognition can be performed by tissue cells to change the physiological responses of the scallop and avoid the filtration of toxic dinoflagellates remains unknown.
The gill tissue melanization observed in scallops affected by P. reticulatum was attributed to modulation of immune response mechanisms that may be related to the migration of hepatocytes to sites where toxic algae or toxins were detected. Large foreign organisms are typically neutralized by hemocyte encapsulation, a process often accompanied by melanization [89]. Cellular melanotic encapsulation is a complex mechanism involving the coordination of hemocytes and various plasma proteins, including components of the phenoloxidase (PO) activation system and certain pattern recognition receptors [90]. Melanization reactions have been reported to be toxic to a wide range of potential pathogens (bacteria, fungi, and viruses) [90]. When organisms encounter potential pathogens, pattern recognition receptors trigger downstream serine protease cascades, ultimately leading to the activation of prophenoloxidase (PPO) [90]. It is suggested that this defense mechanism can be activated by the presence of toxic dinoflagellates, as the melanization of tissues occurs when different shellfish species are exposed to these organisms. Increased melanization in A. purpuratus gills has been reported in scallops exposed to A. catenella and its toxins [91]. In Nodipecten subnodosus, gill melanization has been observed in scallops exposed to PST-producing G. catenatum and is related to hemocyte aggregation and partial shell closure [62,63]. Additionally, in agreement with the melanization mechanism triggered by hemocyte encapsulation, Wikfors and Smolowitz [92] reported hemocyte aggregations containing melanized algal cells in different tissues when juvenile scallops were exposed to P. minimum. The fact that hemocytes activate melanization reactions highlights the idea that toxic algae are detected by the biological system (scallop), supporting previous ideas related to the presence of unknown recognition mechanisms in A. purpuratus that allow scallops to detect P. reticulatum.
In this study, scallops with a higher YTX content reached values below the regulatory limit established by the European Union for humans (3.75 mg Eq. YTX kg−1). However, this toxin has been associated with shellfish mortality (Crassotrea gigas, Venerupis philippinarum, Panopea generosa, Mytilus galloprovincialis, and Mytilus trossulus) when P. reticulatum blooms are registered [27]. YTX has been associated with shellfish mortality in various parts of the world, including Japan [93], Norway [94], Canada [95], Chile [37,38], South Africa [22,23], and New Zealand [96]. These mortalities have been associated with damages in the digestive gland even when toxin is present in organisms tissues at low concentrations (0.28 mg kg−1 equivalent to 2200 ng g−1) [27]. In addition, a recent laboratory study described a reduction in the survival of Argopecten purpuratus veliger larvae exposed to a high cell density of P. reticulatum [97]. In this sense, we recorded a very low concentration of the toxin (below 100 ng g−1), even when feeding organisms with a higher percentage of P. reticulatum (70%). However, digestive gland tissue was affected by YTX. Perhaps survival did not affect the results of this research, providing insight into how P. reticulatum can affect the healthy physiological state of the scallop A. purpuratus, making the organisms more susceptible to other stressful agents such as upwelling, acidification, hypoxia, temperature increase, opportunistic pathogens, and anthropogenic pollution, among others. Attention must be paid to the future scenarios of this dinoflagellate as a potential trigger that compromises A. purpuratus health.
It is worth noting that A. purpuratus exhibited considerable inter-individual variability in its response to P. reticulatum across different response variables in this study. This level of variability has also been documented in other marine bivalves exposed to toxic dinoflagellates, including C. gigas and P. maximus [98]. Previous research in oysters has suggested that this high variability in toxin accumulation is related to differences in feeding behavior [60,98,99,100,101]. Despite the inter-individuality variation results of the present research, particular consideration must be paid if researchers include more sensitive tools to understand the mechanisms underlying the interaction between the scallop A. purpuratus and the toxic dinoflagellate P. reticulatum.
Based on the parameters discussed above, we propose a hypothetical model for the interaction between A. purpuratus juveniles and the toxic dinoflagellate P. reticulatum. In this model, the exposed scallops initially recognize the presence of the dinoflagellate (the recognition of the dinoflagellate per se or the produced toxin) and respond by reducing filtration rates, assimilation rates, and toxin accumulation, possibly through selective filtration. The closure of valves or the cessation of filtration due to the presence of P. reticulatum may be a possible explanation. However, we discarded it as the ammonium excretion rate remained stable in scallops fed different diets and as the filtration rate was only reduced not stopped. On the other hand, prolonged exposure (7 days) leads to tissue damage, which may impair the scallops’ ability to detect the dinoflagellate, resulting in increased toxin accumulation, higher filtration rates, and further damage to the digestive gland and gill tissues (Figure 9). This idea needs further validation by different research groups in order to clarify these interactions. We encourage the application of novel technologies to validate the proposed hypothesis. Furthermore, this study significantly enhances our understanding of the non-food safety impacts that HABs may have on A. purpuratus, as previous studies in the field have reported mortalities in marine invertebrates at lower concentrations of P. reticulatum than those used in our study. Our findings suggest that the observed damage in exposed organisms could make scallops more susceptible to other stressors, such as pathogenic agents and environmental changes. This increased vulnerability may become particularly significant in future scenarios of pathogen expansion and global warming.

5. Conclusions

The present study demonstrates that the physiological responses of A. purpuratus juveniles are significantly impacted by exposure to the toxic dinoflagellate P. reticulatum. Specifically, feeding on diets containing 70% of P. reticulatum resulted in a marked reduction in the clearance rate (CR), organic ingestion rate (OIR), inorganic ingestion rate (IIR), and absorption rate (AR), particularly during the initial seven days of exposure. The tissue damage observed in the digestive gland and gills of scallops exposed to P. reticulatum, including hemocyte infiltration, melanization, and cellular disintegration, underscores the potential for YTX toxins to compromise the health of A. purpuratus. These findings highlight the vulnerability of A. purpuratus to P. reticulatum exposure, with implications for its overall physiological state and resilience to environmental stressors. Further research is necessary to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of toxin detection and the long-term effects of such exposure on scallop health and survival.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.A. and P.A.D.; methodology, M.G.N., G.A., J.A.L.-C., P.M., R.D., M.A. and P.A.D.; software, M.G.N., P.A.D., G.A. and J.A.L.-C.; validation, M.G.N., P.A.D., G.A. and J.A.L.-C.; formal analysis, M.G.N., P.A.D., G.A. and J.A.L.-C.; investigation, M.G.N., G.A., J.A.L.-C., P.M., R.D., M.A. and P.A.D.; resources, G.A.; data curation, G.A. and P.A.D.; writing—original draft preparation, M.G.N., G.A., J.A.L.-C., R.D., M.A. and P.A.D.; writing—review and editing, M.G.N., P.A.D., G.A. and J.A.L.-C.; visualization, G.A., P.A.D. and J.A.L.-C.; supervision, G.A. and P.A.D.; project administration, G.A.; funding acquisition, G.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by ANID+TDP “PROTOCOLO PARA LA DETERMINACION Y VALIDACION DE INDICADORES DE CALIDAD PARA LARVAS Y JUVENILES DEL OSTION DEL NORTE (ARGOPECTEN PURPURATUS) EN HATCHERIES”, TDP220011 from the National Agency of Research and Development (ANID), Chile. Rosario Díaz was funded by ANID BECAS/DOCTORADO NACIONAL 21221359. Patricio A. Díaz was funded by the ANID-FONDECYT 1231220 and by the Centre for Biotechnology and Bioengineering (CeBiB) (PIA project FB0001, ANID, Chile), both from the Chilean National Agency for Research and Development (ANID).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by Comité Ético Científico de la Universidad Católica del Norte Sede Coquimbo. (Approval code CEC UCN N° 01, 13 January 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thanks Carlos Basulto, German Lira, Carlos Solar, Daniel Aguilera, and Hector Galleguillos from the Laboratorio Central de Cultivos Marinos de la Universidad Católica del Norte for their support in scallops juveniles culture. This contribution to SCOR WG #165 MixONET was supported by grant OCE-214035 from the National Science Foundation to the Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research (SCOR) and contributions from SCOR National Committees.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Paz, B.; Daranas, A.H.; Norte, M.; Riobo, P.; Franco, J.M.; Fernandez, J.J. Yessotoxins, a group of marine polyether toxins: An overview. Mar. Drugs 2008, 6, 73–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Paz, B.; Riobó, P.; Fernández, M.L.; Fraga, S.; Franco, J.M.; Ferna, M.L.; Fraga, S.; Paz, B.; Riobo, P. Production and release of yessotoxins by the dinoflagellates Protoceratium reticulatum and Lingulodinium polyedrum in culture. Toxicon 2004, 44, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, N.; Mertens, K.N.; Krock, B.; Luo, Z.; Derrien, A.; Pospelova, V.; Liang, Y.; Bilien, G.; Smith, K.F.; De Schepper, S.; et al. Cryptic speciation in Protoceratium reticulatum (Dinophyceae): Evidence from morphological, molecular and ecophysiological data. Harmful Algae 2019, 88, 101610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Satake, M.; MacKenzie, L.; Yasumoto, T. Identification of Protoceratium reticulatum as the biogenetic origin of yessotoxin. Nat. Toxins 1997, 5, 164–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Armstrong, M.; Kudela, R. Evaluation of California isolates of Lingulodinium polyedrum for the production of yessotoxin. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 2006, 28, 399–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rhodes, L.L.; Mcnabb, P.; De Salas, M.; Briggs, L.; Beuzenberg, V.; Gladstone, M. Yessotoxin production by Gonyaulax spinifera. Harmful Algae 2006, 5, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Riccardi, M.; Guerrini, F.; Roncarati, F.; Milandri, A.; Cangini, M.; Pigozzi, S.; Riccardi, E.; Ceredi, A.; Ciminiello, P.; Dell’Aversano, C.; et al. Gonyaulax spinifera from the Adriatic Sea: Toxin production and phylogenetic analysis. Harmful Algae 2009, 8, 279–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chikwililwa, C.; McCarron, P.; Waniek, J.J.; Schulz-Bull, D.E. Phylogenetic analysis and yessotoxin profiles of Gonyaulax spinifera cultures from the Benguela Current upwelling system. Harmful Algae 2019, 85, 101626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alvarez, G.; Uribe, E.; Regueiro, J.; Blanco, J.; Fraga, S. Gonyaulax taylorii, a new yessotoxins-producer dinoflagellate species from Chilean waters. Harmful Algae 2016, 58, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Murata, M.; Masanori, K.; Lee, J.S.; Yasumoto, T. Isolation and structure of yessotoxin, a novel polyether compound implicated in Diarrhetic Shellfish Poisoning. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 5869–5872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Miles, C.O.; Samdal, I.A.; Aasen, J.A.G.; Jensen, D.J.; Quilliam, M.A.; Petersen, D.; Briggs, L.M.; Wilkins, A.L.; Rise, F.; Cooney, J.M.; et al. Evidence for numerous analogs of yessotoxin in Protoceratium reticulatum. Harmful Algae 2005, 4, 1075–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Aune, T.; Sorby, R.; Yasumoto, T.; Ramstad, H.; Landsverk, T. Comparison of oral and intraperitoneal toxicity of yessotoxins towards mice. Toxicon 2002, 40, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Terao, K.; Ito, E.; Oarada, M.; Murata, M.; Yasumoto, T. Histopathological studies on experimental marine toxin poisoning. 5. The effects on mice of yessotoxin isolated from Patinopecten yessoensis an of a desulfated derivative. Toxicon 1990, 28, 1095–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Alfonso, A.; de la Rosa, L.; Vieytes, M.R.; Yasumoto, T.; Botana, L.M. Yessotoxins, a novel phycotoxin, activates phosphodiesterase activity. Effect of yessotoxin on cAMP levels in human lymphocytes. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2003, 65, 193–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. de la Rosa, L.A.; Alfonso, A.; Vilarino, N.; Vieytes, M.R.; Botana, L.M. Modulation of cytosolic calcium levels of human lymphocytes by yessotoxin, a novel marine phycotoxin. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2001, 61, 827–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bianchi, C.; Fato, R.; Angelin, A.; Trombetti, F.; Ventrella, V.; Borgatti, A.R.; Fattorusso, E.; Ciminiello, P.; Bernardi, P.; Lenaz, G.; et al. Yessotoxin, a shellfish biotoxin, is a potent inducer of the permeability transition in isolated mitochondria and intact cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Bioenerg. 2004, 1656, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Callegari, F.; Sosa, S.; Ferrari, S.; Soranzo, M.R.; Pierotti, S.; Yasumoto, T.; Tubaro, A.; Rossini, G.P. Oral administration of yessotoxin stabilizes E-cadherin in mouse colon. Toxicology 2006, 227, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Korsnes, M.S. Yessotoxin as a Tool to Study Induction of Multiple Cell Death Pathways. Toxins 2012, 4, 568–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Pérez-Gómez, A.; Ferrero-Gutiérrez, A.; Novelli, A.; Franco, J.M.; Paz, B.; Fernández-Sánchez, M.T. Potent neurotoxic action of the shellfish biotoxin yessotoxin on cultured cerebellar neurons. Toxicol. Sci. 2006, 90, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Munday, R.; Aune, T.; Rossini, G.P. Toxicology of the yessotoxins. In Seafood and Freshwater Toxins. Pharmacology, Physiology and Detection; Botana, L., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008; pp. 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. European Commission. Commission regulation N° 786/2013 of 16 August 2013 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) N° 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the permitted limits of yessotoxins in live bivalve molluscs. Off. J. Eur. Union 2013, 220, 14. [Google Scholar]
  22. Grindley, J.R.; Nel, E.A. Red water and mussel poisoning at Elands Bay, December 1966. Fish. Bull. S. Afr. 1970, 36–55. [Google Scholar]
  23. Horstman, D.A. Reported red-water outbreaks and their effects on fauna of the west and south coasts of South Africa, 1959–1980. Fish. Bull. S. Afr. 1981, 15, 71–88. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pitcher, G.C.; Foord, C.J.; Macey, B.M.; Mansfield, L.; Mouton, A.; Smith, M.E.; Osmond, S.J.; van der Molen, L. Devastating farmed abalone mortalities attributed to yessotoxin-producing dinoflagellates. Harmful Algae 2019, 81, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Rogers-Bennett, L.; Kudela, R.; Nielsen, K.; Paquin, A.; O’Kelly, C.; Langlois, G.W.; Crane, D.B.; Moore, J. Dinoflagellate bloom coincides with marine invertebrate mortalities in northern California. Harmful Algae News 2012, 46, 10–11. [Google Scholar]
  26. Jurgens, L.J.; Rogers-Bennett, L.; Raimondi, P.T.; Schiebelhut, L.M.; Dawson, M.N.; Grosberg, R.K.; Gaylord, B. Patterns of Mass Mortality among Rocky Shore Invertebrates across 100 km of Northeastern Pacific Coastline. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. King, T.L.; Nguyen, N.; Doucette, G.J.; Wang, Z.; Bill, B.D.; Peacock, M.B.; Madera, S.L.; Elston, R.A.; Trainer, V.L. Hiding in plain sight: Shellfish-killing phytoplankton in Washington State. Harmful Algae 2021, 105, 102032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Franchini, A.; Malagoli, D.; Ottaviani, E. Targets and effects of yessotoxin, okadaic acid and palytoxin: A differential review. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 658–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Franchini, A.; Milandri, A.; Poletti, R.; Ottaviani, E. Immunolocalization of Yessotoxins in the Mussel Mytilus Galloprovincialis. Toxicon 2003, 41, 967–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tubaro, A.; Dell’ovo, V.; Sosa, S.; Florio, C. Yessotoxins: A toxicological overview. Toxicon 2010, 56, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liang, Y.; Li, Z.; Yuan, J.; Zhou, Y.; Li, M.; Gu, H. ROS-mediated physiological activities and apoptotic effect on the survival of abalone (Haliotis discus hannai) under homoyessotoxin and ammonia stresses. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2024, 275, 109769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liang, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Xi, Y.; He, L.; Zhang, H.; Hu, X.; Gu, H. Toxic effects of combined exposure to homoyessotoxin and nitrite on the survival, antioxidative responses, and apoptosis of the abalone Haliotis discus hannai. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024, 272, 116058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Diaz, P.A.; Alvarez, G.; Pizarro, G.; Blanco, J.; Reguera, B. Lipophilic Toxins in Chile: History, Producers and Impacts. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yasumoto, T.; Takizawa, A. Fluorometric measurement of yessotoxins in shellfish by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1997, 61, 1775–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Díaz, P.A.; Álvarez, G.; Schwerter, C.; Baldrich, Á.M.; Pérez-Santos, I.; Díaz, M.; Araya, M.; Nieves, M.G.; Rosales, S.A.; Mancilla-Gutiérrez, G.; et al. Synchronic distribution of the dinoflagellate Protoceratium reticulatum and yessotoxins in a high stratified fjord system: Tidal or light modulation? Harmful Algae 2024, 135, 102649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Krock, B.; Gloria, C.; Valderrama, K.; Tillmann, U.; Seguel, C.G.; Valderrama, K.; Tillmann, U. Pectenotoxins and yessotoxin from Arica Bay, north Chile as determined by tandem mass spectrometry. Toxicon 2009, 54, 364–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Alvarez, G.; Uribe, E.; Diaz, R.; Braun, M.; Marino, C.; Blanco, J. Bloom of the Yessotoxin producing dinoflagellate Protoceratium reticulatum (Dinophyceae) in Northern Chile. J. Sea Res. 2011, 65, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Alvarez, G.; Rengel, J.; Álvarez, F.; Ganuza, I.; Pino, R.; Muñoz, P.; Rosales, S.; Hevia, V.; Araya, M.; Díaz, P.A.; et al. Mass mortality of marine invertebrates associated with the presence of yessotoxins in northern Chile. Harmful Algal News 2020, 64, 6–7. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sanzana, J. Estudios Preliminares del Ostión (Chlamys purpurata, Lamarck, 1819) de la Zona de Valparaíso; Universidad Católica del Valparaíso: Valparaíso, Chile, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wolff, M.; Taylor, M.H.; Mendo, J.; Yamashiro, B. A catch forecast model for the Peruvian scallop (Argopecten purpuratus) based on estimators of spawning stock and settlement rate. Ecol. Model. 2007, 209, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Valenzuela, A.; Yáñez, C.G.; Golusda, C. The scallop from the chilean north (Argopecten purpuratus), A food with a high nutritional value. Rev. Chil. Nutr. 2011, 38, 148–155. [Google Scholar]
  42. Mendo, J.; Wolff, M.; Mendo, T.; Ysla, L. Scallop Fishery and Culture in Peru. In Scallops: Biology, Ecology, Aquaculture, and Fisheries; Shumway, S.E., Parson, G.J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; Volume 40, pp. 1089–1109. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wolff, M. Population dynamics of the Peruvian scallop Argopecten purpuratus during the El Niño phenomenon of 1983. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1987, 44, 1684–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bakit, J.; Álvarez, G.; Díaz, P.A.; Uribe, E.; Sfeir, R.; Villasante, S.; Bas, T.G.; Lira, G.; Pérez, H.; Hurtado, A.; et al. Disentangling Environmental, Economic, and Technological Factors Driving Scallop (Argopecten purpuratus) Aquaculture in Chile. Fishes 2022, 7, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bakit, J.; Burgos-Fuster, V.; Abarca, A.; Etchepare, I.; Illanes, J.E.; Villasante, S.; Bonilla, E.; Rojas, R.; Dudouet, B.; Cortés, N. Scallop aquaculture growth: Four decades of economic policy in Chile. Mar. Policy 2024, 163, 106139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Guillard, R.R.L.; Ryther, J.H. Studies of marine planktonic diatoms. I. Cyclotella nana Hustedt and Detonula confervacea Cleve. Can. J. Microbiol. 1962, 8, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Guillard, R.R.L.; Hargraves, P.E. Stichochrysis immobilis is a diatom, not a chrysophyte. Phycologia 1993, 32, 234–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Coughlan, J. The estimation of filtering rate from the clarance of suspensions. Mar. Biol. 1969, 2, 356–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bayne, B.L.; Brown, D.A.; Burns, K.; Dixon, D.R.; Ivanovici, A.; Livingstone, D.R.; Lowe, D.M.; Moore, M.N.; Stebbing, A.; Widdows, J. The Effects of Stress and Pollution on Marine Animals; Praeger: Westport, CT, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  50. Conover, R.J. Assimilation of organic matter by zooplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1966, 11, 338–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Solorzano, L. Determination of ammonia in natural waters by the phenolhypochlorite method. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1969, 14, 799–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Widdows, J. Physiological responses to pollution. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1985, 16, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. EU-Harmonised Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Determination of 523 Lipophilic Marine Biotoxins in Molluscs by LC-MS/MS. Available online: https://www.aesan.gob.es/AECOSAN/docs/documentos/laboratorios/LNRBM/ARCHIVO2EU-Harmonised-SOP-LIPO-LCMSMS_Version5.pdf (accessed on 23 July 2024).
  54. Regueiro, J.; Rossignoli, A.E.; Álvarez, G.; Blanco, J. Automated on-line solid-phase extraction coupled to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for determination of lipophilic marine toxins in shellfish. Food Chem. 2011, 129, 533–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kim, Y.; Ashton-Alcox, K.A.; Powell, E.N. Histological Techniques for Marine Bivalve Molluscs: Update; NOS NCCOS 27; NOAA Technical Memorandum: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2006; 76p. [Google Scholar]
  56. Fisher, R.A. The Design of Experiments; Oliver and Boyd: Edinburgh, UK, 1935; p. 252. [Google Scholar]
  57. Pitman, E.J. Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any populations. Suppl. J. R. Stat. Soc. 1937, 4, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Therneau, T. A Package for Survival Analysis in R. In R Package Version 3.5-5 ed. 2023. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survival/vignettes/survival.pdf (accessed on 23 July 2024).
  59. Wheeler, B.; Torchiano, M. Permutation Tests for Linear Models. In R Package Versión 2.1.0 ed. 2022. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmPerm/lmPerm.pdf (accessed on 23 July 2024).
  60. Even, Y.; Pousse, E.; Chapperon, C.; Artigaud, S.; Hégaret, H.; Bernay, B.; Pichereau, V.; Flye-Sainte-Marie, J.; Jean, F. Physiological and comparative proteomic analyzes reveal immune defense response of the king scallop Pecten maximus in presence of paralytic shellfish toxin (PST) from Alexandrium minutum. Harmful Algae 2022, 115, 102231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Contreras, A.M.; Marsden, I.D.; Munro, M.H.G. Physiological Effects and Biotransformation of PSP Toxins in the New Zealand Scallop, Pecten novaezelandiae. J. Shellfish Res. 2012, 31, 1151–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Estrada, N.A.; Lagos, N.; Garcia, C.; Maeda-Martinez, A.N.; Ascencio, F. Effects of the Toxic Dinoflagellate Gymnodinium catenatum on Uptake and Fate of Paralytic Shellfish Poisons in the Pacific Giant Lions-Paw Scallop Nodipecten subnodosus. Mar. Biol. 2007, 151, 1205–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Estrada, N.; de Jesús Romero, M.; Campa-Córdova, A.; Luna, A.; Ascencio, F. Effects of the toxic dinoflagellate, Gymnodinium catenatum on hydrolytic and antioxidant enzymes, in tissues of the giant lions-paw scallop Nodipecten subnodosus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2007, 146, 502–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bricelj, V.M.; Lee, J.H.; Cembella, A.D. Influence of dinoflagellate cell toxicity on uptake and loss of paralytic shellfish toxins in the northern quahog Mercenaria mercenaria. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1991, 75, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Riquelme, C.; Araya, R.; Escribano, R. Selective incorporation of bacteria by Argopecten purpuratus larvae: Implications for the use of probiotics in culturing systems of the Chilean scallop. Aquaculture 2000, 181, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Fernández-Reiriz, M.J.; Labarta, U.; Navarro, J.M. Feeding and digestive response of Argopecten purpuratus to short-term variation in food quality and quantity. Aquaculture 2004, 237, 347–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rosa, M.; Ward, J.E.; Shumway, S.E. Selective Capture and Ingestion of Particles by Suspension-Feeding Bivalve Molluscs: A Review. J. Shellfish Res. 2018, 37, 727–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shumway, S.E.; Cucci, T.L.; Newell, R.C.; Yentsch, C.M. Particle selection, ingestion, and absorption in filter-feeding bivalves. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1985, 9, 77–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Qiao, L.; Chang, Z.; Li, J.; Li, T. Selective feeding of three bivalve species on the phytoplankton community in a marine pond revealed by high-throughput sequencing. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 6163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, Y.; Sunila, I.; Wikfors, G.H. Bioactive effects of Prorocentrum minimum on juvenile bay scallops (Argopecten irradians irradians) are dependent upon algal physiological status. Bot. Mar. 2012, 55, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cucci, T.; Shumway, S.; Newell, R.; Selvin, R.; Guillard, R.; Yentsch, C. Flow cytometry: A new method for characterization of differential ingestion, digestion and egestion by suspension feeders. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1985, 24, 201–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yahel, G.; Marie, D.; Beninger, P.G.; Eckstein, S.; Genin, A. In situ evidence for pre-capture qualitative selection in the tropical bivalve Lithophaga simplex. Aquat. Biol. 2009, 6, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rosa, M.; Ward, J.E.; Shumway, S.E.; Wikfors, G.H.; Pales-Espinosa, E.; Allam, B. Effects of particle surface properties on feeding selectivity in the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica and the blue mussel Mytilus edulis. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2013, 446, 320–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Rosa, M.; Ward, J.E.; Holohan, B.A.; Shumway, S.E.; Wikfors, G.H. Physicochemical surface properties of microalgae and their combined effects on particle selection by suspension-feeding bivalve molluscs. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2017, 486, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hernroth, B.; Larsson, A.; Edebo, L. Influence on uptake, distribution and elimination of Salmonella typhimurium in the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis, by the cell surface properties of the bacteria. J. Shellfish Res. 2000, 19, 167–174. [Google Scholar]
  76. Hong-Sheng, Y.; Jian, W.; Yi, Z.; Ping, W.; Yi-Chao, H.; Fu-Sui, Z. Impact of starvation on survival, meat condition and metabolism ofChlamys farreri. Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 2001, 19, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Navarro, J.M.; Contreras, A.M. An integrative response by Mytilus chilensis to the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium catenella. Mar. Biol. 2010, 157, 1967–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jiang, T.; Wang, L.; Zhang, F.; Fang, X.; Lu, L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, W.; Qu, K.; Chai, C. Selective feeding of bay scallop Argopecten irradians on phytoplankton community revealed by HPLC analysis of phytopigments in Bohai Sea, China. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2019, 37, 1746–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Suárez Korsnes, M.; Espenes, A. Yessotoxin as an apoptotic inducer. Toxicon 2011, 57, 947–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Liang, Y.; Ni, Z.; Zhu, T.; Yang, J.; Ji, N.; Mao, T.; Gu, H. Changes in physiological activities are responsible for homoyessotoxin-induced toxicity in abalone Haliotis discus hannai. Toxicology 2022, 477, 153270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Zhang, T.; Yan, Z.; Zheng, X.; Wang, S.; Fan, J.; Liu, Z. Effects of acute ammonia toxicity on oxidative stress, DNA damage and apoptosis in digestive gland and gill of Asian clam (Corbicula fluminea). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 99, 514–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Barber, B.; Blake, N. Reproductive Physiology. In Scallops: Biology, Ecology, Aquaculture and Fisheries; Shumway, S.E., Parson, G.J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 253–299. [Google Scholar]
  83. Hégaret, H.; da Silva, P.M.; Sunila, I.; Shumway, S.E.; Dixon, M.S.; Alix, J.; Wikfors, G.H.; Soudant, P. Perkinsosis in the Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum affects responses to the harmful-alga, Prorocentrum minimum. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2009, 371, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Galimany, E.; Sunila, I.; Hégaret, H.; Ramón, M.; Wikfors, G.H. Pathology and immune response of the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis L.) after an exposure to the harmful dinoflagellate Prorocentrum minimum. Harmful Algae 2008, 7, 630–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. de la Ballina, N.R.; Maresca, F.; Cao, A.; Villalba, A. Bivalve Haemocyte Subpopulations: A Review. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 826255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Song, L.; Wang, L.; Qiu, L.; Zhang, H. Bivalve Immunity. In Invertebrate Immunity; Soderhall, K., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 44–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Prego-Faraldo, M.V.; Vieira, L.R.; Eirin-Lopez, J.M.; Méndez, J.; Guilhermino, L. Transcriptional and biochemical analysis of antioxidant enzymes in the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis during experimental exposures to the toxic dinoflagellate Prorocentrum lima. Mar. Environ. Res. 2017, 129, 304–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wang, L.; Qiu, L.; Zhou, Z.; Song, L. Research progress on the mollusc immunity in China. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2013, 39, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ling, E.; Yu, X.-Q. Prophenoloxidase binds to the surface of hemocytes and is involved in hemocyte melanization in Manduca sexta. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2005, 35, 1356–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Nakhleh, J.; El Moussawi, L.; Osta, M.A. Chapter Three—The Melanization Response in Insect Immunity. In Advances in Insect Physiology; Ligoxygakis, P., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; Volume 52, pp. 83–109. [Google Scholar]
  91. Hegaret, H.; Brokordt, K.B.; Gaymer, C.F.; Lohrmann, K.B.; García, C.; Varela, D.; Hégaret, H.; Brokordt, K.B.; Gaymer, C.F.; Lohrmann, K.B.; et al. Effects of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium catenella on histopathogical and escape responses of the Northern scallop Argopecten purpuratus. Harmful Algae 2012, 18, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Wikfors, G.H.; Smolowitz, R.M. Detrimental effects of a Prorocentrum isolate upon hard clams and bay scallops in laboratory feeding studies. In Proceedings of the Toxic Phytoplankton Blooms in the Sea, Newport, RI, USA, 28 October–1 November 1991; Smayda, T., Shimizu, Y., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993; pp. 447–452. [Google Scholar]
  93. Koike, K.; Horie, Y.; Suzuki, T.; Kobiyama, A.; Kurihara, K.; Takagi, K.; Kaga, S.N.; Oshima, Y. Protoceratium reticulatum in northern Japan: Environmental factors associated with seasonal occurrence and related contamination of yessotoxin in scallops. J. Plankton Res. 2006, 28, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Aasen, J.; Samdal, I.A.; Miles, C.O.; Dahl, E.; Briggs, L.R.; Aune, T. Yessotoxins in Norwegian blue mussels (Mytilus edulis): Uptake from Protoceratium reticulatum, metabolism and depuration. Toxicon 2005, 45, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Cassis, D. The Effect of Harmful Algae on the Summer Mortality of Juvenile Pacific Oysters (Crassostrea gigas); The University of British Columbia: Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  96. MacKenzie, L.; Truman, P.; Satake, M.; Yasumoto, T.; Adamson, J.E.; Mountfort, D.; White, D. Dinoflagellate blooms associated DSP toxicity in shellfish in New Zealand. In Proceedings of the Harmful Algae, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 25–29 June 1997; Reguera, B., Blanco, J., Fernandez, M.L., Wyatt, T., Eds.; 1998; pp. 74–77. [Google Scholar]
  97. Nieves, M.G.; Diaz, P.A.; Araya, M.; Salgado, P.; Rojas, R.; Quiroga, E.; Pizarro, G.; Alvarez, G. Effects of the toxic dinoflagellate Protoceratium reticulatum and its yessotoxins on the survival and feed ingestion of Argopecten purpuratus veliger larvae. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2024, 199, 116022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Bougrier, S.; Lassus, P.; Bardouil, M.; Masselin, P.; Truquet, P. Paralytic shellfish poison accumulation yields and feeding time activity in the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) and king scallop (Pecten maximus). Aquat. Living Resour. 2003, 16, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Haberkorn, H.; Tran, D.; Massabuau, J.-C.; Ciret, P.; Savar, V.; Soudant, P. Relationship between valve activity, microalgae concentration in the water and toxin accumulation in the digestive gland of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas exposed to Alexandrium minutum. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2011, 62, 1191–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Mat, A.M.; Haberkorn, H.; Bourdineaud, J.-P.; Massabuau, J.-C.; Tran, D. Genetic and genotoxic impacts in the oyster Crassostrea gigas exposed to the harmful alga Alexandrium minutum. Aquat. Toxicol. 2013, 140–141, 458–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Pousse, E.; Flye-Sainte-Marie, J.; Alunno-Bruscia, M.; Hegaret, H.; Jean, F. Sources of paralytic shellfish toxin accumulation variability in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. Toxicon 2018, 144, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Clearance rate of Argopecten purpuratus juveniles exposed to the control diet (A) and two toxic diets (B and C). Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Figure 1. Clearance rate of Argopecten purpuratus juveniles exposed to the control diet (A) and two toxic diets (B and C). Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fishes 09 00331 g001
Figure 2. Inorganic ingestion rate of Argopecten purpuratus juveniles exposed to the control diet (A) and two toxic diets (B and C). Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Figure 2. Inorganic ingestion rate of Argopecten purpuratus juveniles exposed to the control diet (A) and two toxic diets (B and C). Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fishes 09 00331 g002
Figure 3. Organic ingestion rate of Argopecten purpuratus juveniles exposed to the control diet (A) and two toxic diets (B and C). Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Figure 3. Organic ingestion rate of Argopecten purpuratus juveniles exposed to the control diet (A) and two toxic diets (B and C). Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fishes 09 00331 g003
Figure 4. Absorption efficiency of Argopecten purpuratus juveniles exposed to the control diet (A) and two toxic diets (B and C). Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Figure 4. Absorption efficiency of Argopecten purpuratus juveniles exposed to the control diet (A) and two toxic diets (B and C). Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fishes 09 00331 g004
Figure 5. Absorption rates of Argopecten purpuratus juveniles exposed to the control diet (A) and two toxic diets (B and C). Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Figure 5. Absorption rates of Argopecten purpuratus juveniles exposed to the control diet (A) and two toxic diets (B and C). Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fishes 09 00331 g005
Figure 6. Excretion rate of Argopecten purpuratus juveniles exposed to the control diet (A) and two toxic diets (B and C). Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Figure 6. Excretion rate of Argopecten purpuratus juveniles exposed to the control diet (A) and two toxic diets (B and C). Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fishes 09 00331 g006
Figure 7. Toxin concentrations of yessotoxin in Argopecten purpuratus juveniles exposed to the control diet (A) and two toxic diets (B and C). Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Figure 7. Toxin concentrations of yessotoxin in Argopecten purpuratus juveniles exposed to the control diet (A) and two toxic diets (B and C). Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fishes 09 00331 g007
Figure 8. Scallop frequency according to tissue damage level in digestive gland and gill (bar graphs) and histological changes in Argopecten purpuratus exposed to toxic dinoflagellate Protoceratium reticulatum (histological microphotography). Hematoxylin and eosin staining images at magnification of 20× illustrates healthy and damaged tissues of digestive gland and gills. (A): healthy digestive gland tissue; (B): strong infiltration of hemocytes between digestive gland tissue and intestine epithelial cells; (C): damaged irregular digestive tubules containing sloughing and disintegrating digestive cells; (D): reduction in tubule height of epithelial cells of digestive gland; (E): healthy gill tissue; (F): migration of hemocytes to gill filaments; (G): melanization of gill epithelial cells; (H): damaged irregular gill tissue. dt: digestive tubules; idt: irregular digestive tubule, i.e., intestine epithelia; gf: gill filament; m: melanization; i: intestine; h: haemocyte. Diet A: 100% I. galbana; Diet B: 70% I. galbana + 30% P. reticulatum; Diet C: 30% I. galbana + 70% P. reticulatum. T0: beginning of the experiment; T15: day 15 after toxic diet exposure; T30: day 15 after recovery time (end of the experiment). Bar scale: 100 µm.
Figure 8. Scallop frequency according to tissue damage level in digestive gland and gill (bar graphs) and histological changes in Argopecten purpuratus exposed to toxic dinoflagellate Protoceratium reticulatum (histological microphotography). Hematoxylin and eosin staining images at magnification of 20× illustrates healthy and damaged tissues of digestive gland and gills. (A): healthy digestive gland tissue; (B): strong infiltration of hemocytes between digestive gland tissue and intestine epithelial cells; (C): damaged irregular digestive tubules containing sloughing and disintegrating digestive cells; (D): reduction in tubule height of epithelial cells of digestive gland; (E): healthy gill tissue; (F): migration of hemocytes to gill filaments; (G): melanization of gill epithelial cells; (H): damaged irregular gill tissue. dt: digestive tubules; idt: irregular digestive tubule, i.e., intestine epithelia; gf: gill filament; m: melanization; i: intestine; h: haemocyte. Diet A: 100% I. galbana; Diet B: 70% I. galbana + 30% P. reticulatum; Diet C: 30% I. galbana + 70% P. reticulatum. T0: beginning of the experiment; T15: day 15 after toxic diet exposure; T30: day 15 after recovery time (end of the experiment). Bar scale: 100 µm.
Fishes 09 00331 g008
Figure 9. Scallop A. purpuratus response when challenged against the toxic dinoflagellate P. reticulatum for 15 days. These include questions to be validated based on the results of this experiment. Iso: Isochrysis galbana; Pr: P. reticulatum; Reduce or lower (↓); increase or higher (↑); no changes reported (=); red shell: low exposure (first 7 days); orange shell: long-period exposure (from day 7 to day 15). The suggested hypothetical scenario in which the filtration selectivity of A. purpuratus to reject P. reticulatum is lost due to tissue damage in scallops after 7 days of exposure. This loss of functionality causes an increase in the CR of the affected scallops and toxin accumulation.
Figure 9. Scallop A. purpuratus response when challenged against the toxic dinoflagellate P. reticulatum for 15 days. These include questions to be validated based on the results of this experiment. Iso: Isochrysis galbana; Pr: P. reticulatum; Reduce or lower (↓); increase or higher (↑); no changes reported (=); red shell: low exposure (first 7 days); orange shell: long-period exposure (from day 7 to day 15). The suggested hypothetical scenario in which the filtration selectivity of A. purpuratus to reject P. reticulatum is lost due to tissue damage in scallops after 7 days of exposure. This loss of functionality causes an increase in the CR of the affected scallops and toxin accumulation.
Fishes 09 00331 g009
Table 1. Composition of the experimental diets used to feed A. purpuratus juveniles.
Table 1. Composition of the experimental diets used to feed A. purpuratus juveniles.
DietProtoceratium reticulatumIsochrysis galbana
A0%100%
B30%70%
C70%30%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nieves, M.G.; Alvarez, G.; López-Carvallo, J.A.; Millanao, P.; Araya, M.; Díaz, R.; Díaz, P.A. Effects of the Toxic Dinoflagellate Protoceratium reticulatum on Physiological Rates of Juvenile Scallops Argopecten purpuratus. Fishes 2024, 9, 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9090331

AMA Style

Nieves MG, Alvarez G, López-Carvallo JA, Millanao P, Araya M, Díaz R, Díaz PA. Effects of the Toxic Dinoflagellate Protoceratium reticulatum on Physiological Rates of Juvenile Scallops Argopecten purpuratus. Fishes. 2024; 9(9):331. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9090331

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nieves, María Gabriela, Gonzalo Alvarez, Jesús Antonio López-Carvallo, Paulina Millanao, Michael Araya, Rosario Díaz, and Patricio A. Díaz. 2024. "Effects of the Toxic Dinoflagellate Protoceratium reticulatum on Physiological Rates of Juvenile Scallops Argopecten purpuratus" Fishes 9, no. 9: 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9090331

APA Style

Nieves, M. G., Alvarez, G., López-Carvallo, J. A., Millanao, P., Araya, M., Díaz, R., & Díaz, P. A. (2024). Effects of the Toxic Dinoflagellate Protoceratium reticulatum on Physiological Rates of Juvenile Scallops Argopecten purpuratus. Fishes, 9(9), 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9090331

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop