Next Article in Journal
A Sustainable Approach towards Fisheries Management: Incorporating the High-Seas Fisheries Issues into the BBNJ Agreement
Next Article in Special Issue
Impacts of Land Cover Changes on Catches of Nile Perch and Nile Tilapia on Lake Kyoga, Uganda
Previous Article in Journal
Gene Expression Profiling of Trematomus bernacchii in Response to Thermal and Stabling Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
Factors Influencing Early Growth of Juvenile Tiger Trout Stocked into Subalpine Lakes as Biocontrol and to Enhance Recreational Angling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial: New Trends in Freshwater Fishes

by
Elisabetta Pizzul
Department of Life Science, University of Trieste, Via Giorgieri 10, 34127 Trieste, Italy
Fishes 2022, 7(6), 388; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes7060388
Submission received: 12 December 2022 / Accepted: 12 December 2022 / Published: 13 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Freshwater Fishes)
Global changes represent one of the main environmental threats of the Anthropocene and have a strong impact on the biosphere. Freshwater environments are particularly affected by global changes [1] due to their connections with other compartments of the biosphere, as surface freshwater bodies are strictly related to both the land and sea. For example, changing temperatures and rainfall regimes have significant consequences on freshwater environments; they affect riverine flow rates [2], have considerable effects on alpine lakes (which are very sensitive to local and global alterations and are considered early warnings in the mountain area) [3] and cause a loss of seasonality that could alter biotic compartments and ecosystem services [4,5]. Moreover, hydrologic modifications affect freshwater species distribution patterns [6], and freshwater organisms must adapt to survive and avoid extinction [7]. Therefore, the conservation of freshwater environments has become a central issue requiring proper policies and strategies. However, correct management of this issue requires deep knowledge.
Animal and vegetal organisms inhabiting freshwater systems are often used as bioindicators, providing useful information about the factors affecting water bodies, including global changes. Among these organisms, fishes are of particular interest in relation to commercial and recreational fishing, because they are both bioindicators and a resource. In fact, fisheries are one of the most vulnerable sectors to climate change because of their sensitivity to environmental conditions and their pivotal role in feeding people and supporting livelihoods [8]. Climate change has many effects on freshwater fishes [9,10,11], and fish biologists must respond to global changes in order to maintain commercial, recreational, and subsistence fisheries, and to protect species of conservation concern [12].
One of the main issues concerns the distribution areas of native species. Investigations are necessary to understand the correct distribution zones and to understand how they evolve, change, and overlap. Improving this knowledge is crucial to detecting and preserving conservation areas where these species might undergo their whole life cycle. Knowledge about the evolution of fish communities is also important, as it is important to understand how assemblages evolve in relation to global changes. The use of new monitoring methods should be considered to obtain precise data. In this context, environmental DNA (eDNA) could be used and may become an essential technique. eDNA analysis has become an established tool for ecologists, particularly for monitoring rare, elusive, and cryptic species or those for which traditional methods may be ineffective, labor-intensive, or dangerous [13,14,15]. eDNA could also be useful in the monitoring of alien and invasive species, the detection of which must be included in all investigations. The expansion of allochthonous organisms can be accelerated by global changes [16,17,18,19,20], and alien fish often take advantage of conditions that compromise the survival of native ones [6,21]. In such cases, alien species can become invasive and dominant, representing a strong threat to autochthonous organisms due to trophic and habitat competition. Hybridization is also a critical factor [22], increasing danger for both for native fish and their ecosystems. Eradication projects are often difficult or impossible to perform, or they lead to unsatisfying results; therefore, analyses and regular monitoring activities are fundamental to improving knowledge and continuously following the evolution of fish communities for the preparation of population control against alien fishes.
Another critical issue is that climate change reduces habitat availability for fish fauna and other freshwater organisms; moreover, it favors water quality degradation and hinders natural autodepuration processes (with particular reference to riverine ecosystems), the dynamics of which are regulated by natural discharges. It is essential to enhance resilience and adaptive capacity by improving connectivity among habitats, identifying and protecting refugia, and mitigating other stressors such as physical habitat degradation [11,23,24]. Connections among water bodies must be kept within the basins as continuity is often interrupted by weirs or other hydraulic works, which are among the main causes of decline for many fish populations and communities.
Finally, the quality degradation of water bodies implies a higher concentration of pollutants (such as heavy metals, rare earth elements, antibiotics, and microplastics) than in pristine ecosystems, the effects of which are increasingly worrying. Among these pollutants, microplastics have recently been studied in freshwater environments, and their presence has been detected in marine and freshwater fishes [25,26,27]. Microplastics are a major threat to aquatic organisms, together with pollution arising from other anthropogenic activities carried out close to water bodies. Regarding fishes, the ecological and human health impacts across the food-webs are also of concern [28,29].
The issues described herein are building blocks of a critical situation and have led National Red List organizations to classify more and more freshwater fish species as threatened or critically endangered. Therefore, new perspectives regarding ichthyological research in freshwater environments are of pivotal importance, leading to improved knowledge and the provision of tools for obtaining useful data and information for the conservation of habitats and their biodiversity; this is especially important for freshwater ecosystems, as humankind strictly depends on them.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Woodward, G.; Perkins, D.M.; Brown, L.E. Climate change and freshwater ecosystems: Impact across multiple levels of organization. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2010, 365, 2093–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Siddha, S.; Sahu, P. Chapter 5—Impact of Climate Change on the River Ecosystem. In Ecological Significance of River Ecosystems Challenges and Management Strategies; Madhav, S., Kanhaiya, S., Srivastav, A., Sing, V., Singh, P., Eds.; Elsevier: New Delhi, India, 2022; pp. 79–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Moser, K.A.; Baron, J.S.; Brahney, J.; Oleksy, I.A.; Saros, J.E.; Hundey, E.J.; Sadro, S.A.; Kopáček, J.; Sommaruga, R.; Kainz, M.J.; et al. Mountain lakes: Eyes on global environmental change. Glob. Planet Change 2019, 178, 77–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Dolinar, N.; Rudolf, M.; Šraj, N.; Gaberščik, A. Environmental changes affect ecosystem services of the intermittent Lake Cerknica. Ecol. Complex. 2010, 7, 403–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bertoli, M.; Lesa, D.; Merson, A.; Pastorino, P.; Prearo, M.; Pizzul, E. Biodiversity and Litter Breakdown in a Karstic Freshwater System (Doberdò Lake, Northeast Italy) in Relation to Water Level Fluctuations and Environmental Features. Diversity 2022, 14, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kirk, M.A.; Rahel, F.J. Air temperatures over-predict changes to stream fish assemblages with climate warming compared with water temperatures. Ecol. Appl. 2022, 32, e02465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pandit, S.N.; Maitland, B.M.; Pandit, L.K.; Poesch, M.S.; Enders, E.C. Climate change risks, extinction debt, and conservation implications for a threatened freshwater fish: Carmine Shiner (Notropis percobromus). Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 598, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Galappaththi, E.K.; Susarla, V.B.; Loutet, S.J.T.; Ichinen, S.T.; Hyman, A.A.; Ford, J.D. Climate change adaptation in fisheries. Fish Fish. 2021, 23, 4–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Myers, B.J.E.; Lynch, A.J.; Bunnell, D.B.; Chu, C.; Falke, J.A.; Kovach, R.P.; Krabbenhoft, T.J.; Kwak, T.J.; Paukert, C.P. Global synthesis of the documented and projected effects of climate change on inland fishes. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2017, 27, 339–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tingley, R.W., III; Paukert, C.; Sass, G.G.; Jacobson, P.C.; Hansen, G.J.A.; Lynch, A.J.; Danielle Shannon, P. Adapting to climate change: Guidance for the management of inland glacial lake fisheries. Lake Reserv. Manag. 2019, 35, 435–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rahel, F.J. Managing Freshwater Fish in a Changing Climate: Resist, Accept, or Direct. Fish. Mag. 2022, 47, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Paukert, C.P.; Glazer, B.A.; Hansen, G.J.A.; Irwin, B.J.; Jacobson, P.C.; Kershner, J.L.; Shuter, B.J.; Whitney, J.E.; Lynch, A.J. Adapting inland fisheries management to a changing climate. Fisheries 2016, 41, 374–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Thomsen, P.F.; Willerslev, E. Environmental DNA–An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity. Biol. Conserv. 2015, 183, 4–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chadwick, D.D.A.; Pritchard, E.G.; Bradley, P.; Sayer, C.D.; Chadwick, M.A.; Eagle, L.J.B.; Axmacher, J.C. A novel ‘triple drawdown’ method highlights deficiencies in invasive alien crayfish survey and control techniques. J. Appl. Ecol. 2020, 58, 316–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Manfrin, C.; Zanetti, M.; Stanković, D.; Fattori, U.; Bertucci-Maresca, V.; Giulianini, P.G.; Pallavicini, A. Detection of the endangered stone crayfish Austropotamobius torrentium (Schrank, 1803) and its congeneric A. pallipes in its last Italian biotope by eDNA Analysis. Diversity 2022, 14, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Early, R.; Bradley, B.A.; Dukes, J.S.; Lawler, J.J.; Olden, J.D.; Blumenthal, D.M.; Gonzales, P.; Grosholz, E.D.; Ibañez, I.; Miller, L.P.; et al. Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Bellard, C.; Rysman, J.F.; Leroy, B.; Claud, C.; Mace, G.M. A global picture of biological invasion threat on islands. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 1, 1862–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gallardo, B.; Bacher, S.; Bradley, B.; Comín, F.A.; Gallien, L.; Jeschke, J.M.; Sorte, C.J.B.; Vilà, M. InvasiBES: Understanding and managing the impacts of Invasive alien species on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. NeoBiota 2019, 50, 109–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Essl, F.; Lenzner, B.; Bacher, S.; Bailey, S.; Capinha, C.; Daehler, C.; Dullinger, S.; Genovesi, P.; Hui, C.; Hulme, P.E.; et al. Drivers of future alien species impacts: An expert-based assessment. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2020, 26, 4880–4893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hong, S.; Jang, I.; Kim, D.; Kim, S.; Park, H.S.; Lee, K. Predicting Potential Habitat Changes of Two Invasive Alien Fish Species with Climate Change at a Regional Scale. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Roberts, J.J.; Fausch, K.D.; Hooten, M.B.; Peterson, D.P. Nonnative trout invasions combined with climate change threaten persistence of isolated cutthroat trout populations in the Southern Rocky Mountains. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 2017, 37, 314–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Blackwell, T.; Ford, A.G.P.; Ciezarek, A.G.; Bradbeer, S.J.; Gracida Juarez, C.A.; Smith, A.M.; Ngatunga, B.P.; Shechonge, A.; Tamatamah, R.; Etherington, G.; et al. Newly discovered cichlid fish biodiversity threatened by hybridization with non-native species. Molec. Ecol. 2021, 30, 895–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Isaak, D.J.; Luce, C.H.; Horan, D.L.; Chandler, G.L.; Wollrab, S.P.; Nagel, D.E. Global warming of salmon and trout rivers in the northwestern U.S.: Road to ruin or path through purgatory? Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 2018, 147, 566–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jacobson, P.C.; Fang, X.; Stefan, H.G.; Pereira, D.L. Protecting Cisco (Coregonus artedi Leseur) oxythermal habitat from climate change: Building resilience in deep lakes using a landscape approach. Adv. Limnol. 2013, 64, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dantas, D.V.; Barletta, M.; Da Costa, M.F. The seasonal and spatial patterns of ingestion of polyfilament nylon fragments by estuarine drums (Sciaenidae). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2012, 19, 600–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sanchez, W.; Bender, C.; Porcher, J.M. Wild gudgeons (Gobio gobio) from french rivers are contaminated by microplastics: Preliminary study and first evidence. Environ. Res. 2014, 128, 98–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jabeen, K.; Su, L.; Li, J.; Yang, D.; Tong, C.; Mu, J.; Shi, H. Microplastics and mesoplastics in fish from coastal and fresh waters of China. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 221, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Miranda, D.D.A.; de Carvalho-Souza, G.F. Are we eating plastic-ingesting fish? Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2016, 103, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Duis, K.; Coors, A. Microplastics in the aquatic and terrestrial environment: Sources (with a specific focus on personal care products), fate and effects. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2016, 28, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pizzul, E. Editorial: New Trends in Freshwater Fishes. Fishes 2022, 7, 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes7060388

AMA Style

Pizzul E. Editorial: New Trends in Freshwater Fishes. Fishes. 2022; 7(6):388. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes7060388

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pizzul, Elisabetta. 2022. "Editorial: New Trends in Freshwater Fishes" Fishes 7, no. 6: 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes7060388

APA Style

Pizzul, E. (2022). Editorial: New Trends in Freshwater Fishes. Fishes, 7(6), 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes7060388

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop