Next Article in Journal
Phosphorus in Salmonid Aquaculture: Sources, Requirements, and System-Level Implications
Previous Article in Journal
Histochemical Study of Enzyme Activity in the Digestive Tract of the Small-Spotted Catshark (Scyliorhinus canicula) and the Smooth-Hound (Mustelus mustelus)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of the Inclusion of Natural Pigments on the Performance and Gene Expression of Immune Response and Oxidative Stress of Oreochromis niloticus Cultured in a Biofloc System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

L-Arginine Effect as an Additive on Overall Performance, Health Status, and Expression of Stress Molecular Markers in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Under Chronic Salinity Exposure

by
Andrea Itzel Munguía-Casillas
1,2,
María Teresa Viana
2,
Miroslava Vivanco-Aranda
1,
Luis Eduardo Ruiz-González
3,
Emyr Saul Peña-Marín
2,* and
Oscar Basilio Del Rio-Zaragoza
2,*
1
Facultad de Ciencias Marinas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (UABC), Fraccionamiento Playitas, Carr. Tijuana-Ensenada 3917, Ensenada 22860, Baja California, Mexico
2
Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas (IIO), Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (UABC), km 107 Carretera Tij/Eda, Ensenada 22860, Baja California, Mexico
3
Laboratorio de Calidad de Agua y Acuicultura Experimental, Centro de Investigaciones Costeras, Universidad de Guadalajara, Puerto Vallarta 48280, Jalisco, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fishes 2025, 10(8), 387; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10080387
Submission received: 16 May 2025 / Revised: 8 July 2025 / Accepted: 24 July 2025 / Published: 6 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fish Hematology)

Abstract

Growing freshwater fish in saline environments is being explored as a potential solution to the freshwater shortage. However, growing these organisms in suboptimal salinity conditions leads to chronic stress that can be challenging to manage. To address this goal, it is crucial to improve the health of fish through the use of dietary supplements. This study evaluated the effects of varying levels of arginine supplementation on the growth, health status, and expression of stress-related molecular markers in juveniles of Nile tilapia exposed to chronic salinity stress. The tilapia were fed four experimental diets supplemented with 0, 1, 2, and 3% of L-arginine (T0, T1, T2, and T3). After an acclimatization period, the tilapias were exposed to a salinity level of 20‰ for 57 days in a recirculating aquaculture system. Our findings revealed that overall performance parameters were significantly influenced by L-arginine supplementation, except for the condition factor, viscerosomatic index, and hepatosomatic index. Additionally, intermediate levels of L-arginine supplementation positively influenced various blood parameters, including hematological profiles (hemoglobin and leukocytes), blood chemistry (total protein, albumin, globulin, and triglycerides), and the frequency of certain nuclear abnormalities. Furthermore, L-arginine supplementation appeared to regulate the expression of molecular markers related to stress and the immune system. In conclusion, this study indicates that L-arginine supplementation can help alleviate the chronic stress caused by salinity in juvenile Nile tilapia.
Key Contribution: This study suggests that supplementation with arginine (T3) increases weight gain and specific growth rate in Nile tilapia. Additionally, arginine supplementation enhances the immune system in Nile tilapia under chronic salinity stress, exhibiting a quadratic trend in the expression of stress and immune system molecular markers. Consequently, a diet supplemented with arginine (T3) could reduce the effects of chronic salinity stress in Nile tilapia.

1. Introduction

Climate change and population growth have recently been identified as two of the world’s most pressing challenges [1,2]. These issues contribute to a range of related problems that impact human well-being, including water shortage, ocean acidification, and food insecurity [1,2,3]. To address these challenges, international organizations such as the United Nations (UN) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) have proposed specific solutions. These include the implementation of aquaculture practices, which have the potential to address food security issues by providing high-quality meat at a low cost [1,4].
Aquaculture can be developed in various regions, utilizing both natural and artificial bodies of water [1,4,5]. However, this practice may be counterproductive in areas facing water shortages. Therefore, the goal should be to expand mariculture and promote aquaculture development in coastal areas [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The four species that are most commonly produced and consumed around the world are white-legged shrimp (Penaeus vannamei), oysters (Crassostrea spp.), Chinese carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella), and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) [1]. However, the latter two are freshwater organisms [1].
The culture of tilapia and its hybrids in brackish and high-salinity waters is feasible, which opens up tropical and arid coastal areas to tilapia production and could significantly expand global production of this important group of species [7]. Among the aquaculture organisms, Nile tilapia stands out due to its versatility in feeding, low maintenance cost, rapid growth, wide adaptability to adverse conditions, tolerance for a broad range of temperatures, and easy reproduction [8,9,10]. While Nile tilapia is primarily a freshwater fish with an optimum salinity level of 0–8 parts per thousand (‰), it can thrive in waters with salinities up to 20‰ and shows remarkable tolerance at even higher salinity levels [7,10,11,12,13,14]. Under a pre-acclimation period and gradual increase in salinity, Nile tilapia could tolerate salinity over 30‰ [7,10,11,12,13,14]. However, to survive in elevated salinities, Nile tilapia require a higher protein intake [7,14,15]; in addition, it can be stressful [15,16,17]. Prolonged exposure to suboptimal or elevated salinity levels has been documented to lead to increased cortisol and glucose levels, along with reduced growth and survival rates [16,17,18,19]. Furthermore, freshwater organisms, when kept at salinity levels that exceed their optimal range, experience chronic stress [17,18,20,21].
Chronic stress in aquaculture is considered particularly detrimental because it requires a significant amount of energy from the organisms [20,21,22,23], which can compromise their overall performance. The consequences of this energy demand may include tissue damage, alteration in metabolic processes, reduced growth, changes in the antioxidant system, weakened immune response, and death in severe cases [19,20,21,22,23]. To mitigate these adverse effects, researchers have sought to implement dietary additives that help organisms cope with challenging conditions [23,24,25].
Dietary additives are additional components added into the diet that are not classified as but are included in smaller amounts to provide beneficial effects on the organism [23,25,26]. Some of the most studied dietary additives include vitamins, minerals, certain amino acids, and fatty acids [23,24,25,26,27]. Amino acids play a crucial role not only in constructing tissues but also in various metabolic processes. Consequently, there is increasing interest in using amino acids as dietary additives to enhance stress resistance.
Certain amino acids, including tryptophan, phenylalanine, methionine, taurine, glutamine, glycine, and arginine, have gained attention for their ability to mitigate the harmful effects of various stressors [25,27,28,29]. Arginine in particular plays a crucial role, being essential in protein synthesis, such as the production of important hormones (growth hormone, GH, and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) [29]). Additionally, it works as a precursor of nitric oxide, which modulates blood circulation and enhances the viability of ATP production through phosphagen kinase. It also plays an indirect role in energy storage via gluconeogenesis [25,28,29]. Furthermore, arginine helps modulate immune responses, supports the antioxidant system, and reduces serum lipid levels [25,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39].
The use of arginine as a dietary additive has been shown to enhance resistance to stressors in several species, including Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) [33] (stressed by high pH), Mrigal carp (Cirrhinus mrigala) [32] (stressed by hypoxia), turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) [37] (stressed by hypoxia and handling), Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis) [34], Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) [40] (stressed by Streptococcus agalactiae), and common carp (Cyprinus carpio) [41] (stressed by ammonia toxicity). Additionally, arginine supplementation has been investigated regarding fatty acid oxidation [38,39], as well as its impact on hematological parameters, antioxidant levels, and immune system function [40,42,43]. Nevertheless, it remains unclear to what extent dietary supplementation with L-arginine may provide similar benefits to Nile tilapia cultured in brackish water.
Therefore, this study aims to assess the effect of varying levels of L-arginine supplementation on growth, health status, and the expression of molecular markers related to stress and immune system function in Nile tilapia exposed to chronic saline stress.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design

The Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) juveniles were donated by an Aquamol aquaculture producer in Jamay, Jalisco. México. The experiment was conducted at the Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas at the Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (IIO-UABC, Ensenada, B.C., México). A total of 25 juveniles per tank were randomly distributed. The juveniles (4.04 ± 0.72 g) were acclimatized to 20‰ over 4 days, with an increase of 5‰ per day. The experimental system consisted of 12 tanks, 500 L each, connected to a recirculation system (RAS) under a constant aeration system. The RAS system was integrated by a biofilter (PolyGeyser®; Pneumatic Drop Bead Filter model PG7 International Filter Solutions, Midland, TX, USA), a protein skimmer, a UV lamp, settlers in each tank, and a 1000-L reservoir with a heater at constant temperature (27.41 ± 0.9 °C). Dissolved oxygen was monitored daily with a multi-parameter (YSI-55, YSI Inc., Yellow Springs, OH, USA), registering 8.0 ± 0.2 mg/L. The salinity was monitored with a portable refractometer (Portable refractometer WL0020-ATC, Agriculture Solutions LLC, Kingfield, ME, USA) and registered 20.5 ± 2.5‰. Ammonium (0.05 ± 0.1 mg/L) and nitrite (0 ± 0 mg/L) levels were monitored once a week (API test kits, Mars Fishcare Inc., Chalfont, PA, USA). The tanks were siphoned daily, whereas the RAS system was backwashing once a week. During the acclimatization period, the fish were fed the control diet (T0). After acclimatization was completed. The other treatments were supplied for the start of the feeding trial (Table 1). The experimental diets were fed four times a day (8:00, 11:00, 14:00, and 17:00 h) seven days a week, at apparent satiety.

2.2. Experimental Diet Design

Four isoproteic diets, each containing 45% crude protein and 10% crude lipid, were formulated as shown in Table 1. The crude protein requirements were adjusted according to those recommended by [8,14,15,16] for organisms of the same species in the 0.02–10 g range. The diets varied based on the levels of arginine included, with glycine (Gly) as a replacement. The diets were assigned as follows: T0 (control diet), T1 (1% arginine), T2 (2% arginine), and T3 (3% arginine). The selection of concentrations/percentages of dietary arginine addition was based on the optimal intake of Nile tilapia under unstressed conditions and the maximum dietary supplementation ranges reported for other fish species [8,35,36].
Diets were prepared at the LINDEAACUA plant at the II0-UABC facilities (Ensenada, Mexico), according to their internal protocols. Macronutrients were ground to 0.5 mm (Inmimex M-300, Tlaxcala, Mexico) and sieved (Kemutek-Gardner K300, Bristol, PA, USA). Mixing was then performed in a vertical cutter/mixer (Robot Coupe R-60, Ridgeland, MS, USA). Incorporation was performed in four steps. The first consisted of the incorporation of the macronutrients, the second consisted of the incorporation of the micronutrients and arginine/glycine, the third consisted of the gelatin and cooked starch, and the last consisted of the incorporation of the fat source (beef tallow). The dough was mixed until a homogeneous mixture was achieved. It was then pelletized to 5 mm in a commercial feed mill (Tor-Rey, model M32-5, San Nicolas, Mexico). They were dried in a forced air oven at 60 °C for 24 h and stored at 4 °C in plastic bags.

2.3. Proximal Composition

Experimental diets were analyzed in triplicate according to AOAC [44]. The dry weight of the diet was determined by the gravimetric method, drying the samples at 60 °C for 24 h. After that, the samples were ashed in a muffle furnace (Thermolyne 62700 muffle furnace) at 550 °C for 6 h and then weighed. Crude protein was determined by the micro-Kjeldahl method (rapid distillation unit, Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA), and a nitrogen conversion (N*6.25) was made to calculate the protein content. Crude lipid was extracted and quantified by the Soxhlet method (Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA), using petroleum ether as the solvent carrier. Finally, the nitrogen-free extract (NFE) was determined by the difference.

2.4. Sampling

Following a 57-day feeding trial, the organisms were quantitatively assessed and weighed. These data were used for the quantification of the following metrics.
Specific growth rate (SGR, %/d) = 100 × ((ln final weight–ln initial weight) × days)
Feed conversion ratio (FCR) = total feed consumed/wet weight gained
Condition factor (CF) = (final body weight/total body length3) × 100
Survival rate (SR, %) = Final number of fish × 100/initial number of fish
At the end of the biometry, three organisms per tank were euthanized according to UABC protocols for the utilization of animals for experimental purposes. The process to anesthetize fish was carried out with 2-phenoxyl-ethanol (100‰) at a dilution of 0.5 mL/L. A blood sample was collected from the caudal vein using tuberculin syringes (1 mL). The blood sample was subsequently divided into three parts: a tube with EDTA-K2 (Becton Dickinson®, Gurgaon, Haryana) for hematological analysis, a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube (Eppendorf®, Hamburg, Germany) for blood chemistry, and a drop in an object holder for blood smears (hematology). The sample without anticoagulant was centrifuged at 7000 rpm for 10 min. Subsequently, the serum was stored at −20 °C. Following the collection of blood samples, the organisms were dissected to quantify morphometric parameters.
Hepatosomatic index (HSI, %) = (liver weight/body weight) × 100
Viscerosomatic index (VSI, %) = (visceral weight/body weight) × 100
A tissue sample of approximately 1 cm3 was extracted from the liver and transferred into a centrifuge tube free of RNAases, containing RNA later (Ambion, Leicestershire, UK). The tubes were left at room temperature for 24 h and then stored at −80 °C.

2.5. Hematology Assay

The blood from the EDTA tube was used to calculate the hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), and blood cell count. The Hct was estimated using a 2/3 filled capillary tube (Leex Equipment, Santiago de Querétaro, Mexico). The tubes were sealed and placed in a micro-hematocrit centrifuge at 7000 rpm (Premiere® XC-3012, Jalisco, Mexico) for 10 min. The packed cells were measured using the hematocrit reader and reported as percentages [45]. The Hb was measured using the HemoCue ® Hb 201 (HemoCue AB; Angelholm, Sweden). Red blood cell (RBC) and white blood cell (WBC) counts were made with the Natt–Herrick method [46]. The blood sample was then placed in a Neubauer hemocytometer (Marienfeld-Superior, Lauda-Königshofen, Germany) using 20 μL of blood mixed with the Natt–Herrick solution in a 1:200 ratio, and the cells were counted using an optical microscope (Karl Zeiss, Primo Star, Coyoacán, México) at 40×. The mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration were calculated using standard formulas with data from Hct, RBC, and Hb.
Mean corpuscular volume (MCV, fL) = (Hct/RBC) × 10
Mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH, pg) = (Hb/RBC) × 10
Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC, g/dL) = (Hb/Hct) × 100
For leukocyte cellular differentiation and micronucleus assay, we use the samples of the blood smears and implement the method of [45,46,47,48]. The staining was made with the Hemocrom-Fix kit®, following the manufacturer’s instructions. Blood smears were mounted with Cytoseal™ 60 resin and observed in an optical microscope. From each blood smear, the percentage of each of the leukocyte cellular types was calculated.
Nuclear morphological alterations in erythrocytes were classified as follows: blebbed, notched, and binucleate. Only erythrocytes with intact nuclear and cytoplasmic membranes were taken into account, discarding those superimposed or damaged.

2.6. Serum Biochemical Parameters

The serum biochemical parameters assay was calculated using colorimetric kits (MexLab Group, Jalisco, Mexico) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Total protein was determined with the Biuret method at 540 nm. Albumin was determined using the bromocresol green method (BCG) at 620 nm. The glucose oxidase method (GOD-PAP) was measured at 505 nm for glucose concentration. While the triglycerides assay was performed with the glycerol-3-phosphate-oxidase method (GPO-PAP) at 505 nm, and cholesterol was analyzed with cholesterol esterase (CHOD-PAP) at 505 nm. The globulin was calculated by the contrast of total protein and albumin. All blood parameters analyzed in each sample were performed in triplicate, and the reader used a microplate reader (Multiskan GO, Thermo Scientific).

2.7. RNA Extraction and Quantitative PCR

The protocols followed for the RNA extraction and qPCR are described in detail in [49]. The liver tissue preserved in RNAlater was individually analyzed to extract the RNA with the PureLink RNAlink Minikit (Ambion). To homogenize the tissue, a micropistill was used. The quantity and quality of RNA were measured by spectrophotometry (Nanodrop® LITE, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA). Only the samples with an optical density ratio of 260 at 280 nm within the range of 1.90 to 2.10 were used.
The RNA extracted (500 ng) was reverse-transcribed with the High-Capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit in a 20 µL reaction, according to the manual (Applied Biosystems; Carlsbad, CA, USA).
The qPCR reaction was performed using the SYBR® Select Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). PCR conditions were 10 min at 95 °C for an initial denaturation and polymerase activation step; 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s; in the annealing and extension step, the temperature was 60 °C for 45 s; and the melting curve was from 60 °C to 95 °C for 20 min. The relative gene quantification was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT Method [49]. Primer efficiency was determined by five 1:10 dilution series. The specific primers used in this study are shown in Table 2.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Normality and homogeneity of variance were assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk and Levene tests, respectively. If the statistical assumptions were met, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied, with a post hoc Tukey test. Otherwise, a Kruskal–Wallis test was used. All tests were with the significance level set at 0.05. Additionally, polynomial regression analysis and orthogonal polynomial contrast were performed in all cases to observe the tendency of the different arginine levels used. Only regressions with R2 greater than 0.7 were submitted. All statistical analyses, with the exception of the orthogonal polynomial contrast, were performed using SPSS Statistics® V26.0.0® (IBM Corporation, 1989, 2011, Armonk, NY, USA). The orthogonal polynomial contrast was performed using R Studio software version 4.3.2 (R Core Team, 2020, Vienna, Austria).

3. Results

3.1. Performance and Biological Index

As a result of a 57-day nutritional trial, organisms fed the 3% additional arginine diet had higher weight gain and SGR in contrast to the control treatment (p < 0.05; Table 3). However, major differences were not shown by T1 and 2 (p > 0.05) compared to the other groups. The survival rate was significantly higher in T2 (94%) compared to T0 and T3 (p < 0.05), but not compared to T1 treatment (p > 0.05). The FCR ranged from 1.05 to 1.25, with no significant differences observed between treatments (p > 0.05). Additionally, there was no statistical significance observed in the correlation between total length and final weight of the organisms. However, weight gain (R2 = 0.975) and specific growth rate (SGR) (R2 = 0.998) exhibited a linear correlation. In contrast, strong quadratic correlations were recorded for feed conversion ratio (FCR) (R2 = 0.983), and survival rate (R2 = 0.781) (see Figure 1).
The organisms of the different experimental diets did not show significant differences in condition index, hepatosomatic index, and visceral index (p > 0.05; Table 4).

3.2. Hematology

The hematological results are summarized in Table 5. Hematocrit, RBC, and MCH do not show differences among treatments (p > 0.05). The study found that the hemoglobin concentration in the control group (6.7 g/dL) was significantly lower (p < 0.05) compared to the other treatment groups (8.15 to 8.25 g/dL). The white blood cell count was found to be significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the T3 group (13.6 × 103/mm3) when compared to the T0 group (11.2 × 103/mm3). However, treatments T1 (12.4 × 103/mm3) and T2 (13.0 × 103/mm3) did not show significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05). The MCV had a considerable decrease (p < 0.05) in the T2 (134.1 fL) and T3 (140.8 fL) treatments in contrast to the T0 (183.2 fL) and T1 (179.9 fL) groups. On the other hand, MCHC showed a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the T2 group (34.9 g/dL) in contrast to the T0 (28.8 g/dL) and T1 (29.3 g/dL) groups. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) between the T3 (34.2 g/dL) group and the other groups.

3.3. Differential Leukocyte Count

The percentages of neutrophils, basophils, and eosinophils failed to demonstrate significant differences (p > 0.05; see Table 6). However, differences were found in the lymphocyte count, where the T2 treatment resulted in a significantly higher (p < 0.05) increase (75.5%) compared to the other treatments (<65%). Furthermore, a significantly lower monocyte count was found in the T2 group (p < 0.05). Regarding the thrombocyte levels, the control group resulted in a significantly higher amount (75.7%) than the other treatments (<66.4%, p < 0.05).

3.4. Micronucleus and Nuclear Aberrations Assay

The different diets did not affect the presence of micronuclei, blebbel, and notched nuclear aberrations of erythrocytes (p > 0.05; see Table 7). A reduced incidence of binucleated nuclear aberrations has been observed in the T1 dietary treatment, in contrast to the T0 and T3 treatments (p < 0.05). The T2 group did not show any major differences (p > 0.05) compared to the other groups.

3.5. Serum Biochemistry Parameters

The present study revealed that cholesterol and glucose levels remained unchanged across all experimental groups (p > 0.05; see Table 8). Triglyceride levels in groups T0 and T2 were significantly similar but differed from T1 and T4 (p > 0.05). However, a significant increase (p < 0.05) was observed in the T3 treatment (183 mg/dL), in contrast to the T1 group (138 mg/dL), which exhibited a decrease. The total protein content was found to be higher (p < 0.05) in the T1 (3.2 mg/dL) group compared to the T2 group (2.2 mg/dL). In contrast, there were no significant differences among the T0, T1, and T3 groups (p > 0.05). Similarly, in other comparisons, the T0 and T3 treatments failed to show a significant difference (p > 0.05). Globulin levels exhibited a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the T1 treatment group, in contrast to the T2 treatment group. There were no significant differences (p < 0.05) between T3 and the other treatments. The albumin levels were significantly higher in the T1 and T3 treatment groups (p < 0.05) than in the T2 group. In contrast to the other groups, the albumin level in T0 did not show a significant difference (p > 0.05).

3.6. Gene Relative Expression

Despite no significant differences being observed among the various levels of arginine inclusion and the relative expression of il-10, hsp 70, and sod (p > 0.05), a strong quadratic trend correlation was noted in the relative gene expression levels. The expression of il-10 (R2 = 0.861; p > 0.05; Figure 2A) decreased when arginine increased. Whereas the sod (R2 = 0.935; p > 0.05; Figure 2B) increased at intermediate arginine levels, hsp 70 (R2 = 0.962; p > 0.05; Figure 2C) decreased at higher arginine levels (Figure 2).

4. Discussion

The results of this study demonstrate that increasing levels of arginine lead to a higher SGR. The highest SGR was observed in the T3 treatment group, which is a trend that aligns with previous studies in Chinese perch (Siniperca chuatsi) [30], Mrigal carp (Cirrhinus mrigala) [32], Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) [33], and Nile tilapia grown in freshwater [43]. However, in this study, maximum growth was observed at concentrations of 9.16% total arginine, corresponding to T3, which differs from previous reports.
For instance, Nile tilapia cultured in freshwater reached maximum growth at arginine concentrations of 6.24%, while S. chuatsi achieved this at 2.61%. This discrepancy may be attributed to arginine’s role in counteracting saline stress as a promoter of protein synthesis, in particular for the increase of GH and IGF-1 levels [36].
In Nile tilapia culture, it has been reported that a salinity stress above 15‰ can increase the mortality rate to 16.67%, which can reach 33.33% at salinity levels of 20‰ [50]. In the present study, organisms from T1 and T2 dietary treatments had an increased survival rate, with mortality rates of 15% and 8%, respectively. The improved survival observed at these arginine concentrations (3.6% and 4.6% of the dry diet) is similar to those reported for Chinese perch [30] and Chinese mitten crab [33], where the highest survival rates were observed at concentrations of 3.37% [30] and 4.01% [33] of the dry diet, despite not having significant differences among treatments. The higher survival rates observed in T1 and T2 may be linked to an increased requirement for arginine in stressful situations. Other studies have indicated that plasma arginine levels decrease when facing nitrogen-ammonia stress and pathogen exposure [25,35]. However, there is insufficient corroborating data to support these findings.
Hematological parameters are crucial fish health indicators, allowing for the assessment of stressors to identify the impact on the organism’s health [17,45]. In this study, hemoglobin concentrations were significantly lower in the control group, in accordance with Mohamed et al.’s [51] observations, who reported reduced hemoglobin levels at high salinity. Those authors attributed the decrease in Hb to an increase in osmoregulatory dysfunction caused by high salinity levels. The mean corpuscular volume increased with higher arginine concentration, while the mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration also rose alongside arginine levels. This pattern is consistent with previous findings for juveniles of the same species [42]. The relationship between Hb and MVC is significant, as both indicate a compensatory response to elevated salinity levels. This response is characterized by an increase in cell volume resulting from low Hb concentration [51].
One of the most widely studied functions of dietary arginine supplementation is its role as an immunostimulant [25,29,36,52]. Arginine acts as a precursor for the synthesis of nitric oxide and polyamines, which promote cell proliferation. It plays a crucial role in modulating the inflammatory response, influencing the TOR signaling pathways, and supporting lymphocyte proliferation [25,29,35,36,52]. Supplementing with arginine promotes the biosynthesis of polyamines, resulting in an increased number of leukocytes [35,36]. In this study, a significant increase in white blood cells was observed alongside higher concentrations of arginine. This effect has been previously observed in Jian carp [53], turbot (S. maximus) [37], and Nile tilapia [54]. Interestingly, the dietary treatment T2 led to an increase in leukocytes and a decrease in monocytes, contrasting with the other dietary treatments. This finding is consistent with previous reports on the turbot [37], where organisms exhibited a similar response to T2 from the present study. A study on catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) [55] evaluated the components of the innate immune system and found that supplementing 4% arginine led to an increase in lysozyme levels. An increase that may be associated with a rise in monocytes and granulocytes [55].
Additionally, higher levels of lymphocytes and monocytes are closely related with arginine’s role in polyamine synthesis, which is essential for cell proliferation [37]. Considering the importance of these cells in both the innate and adaptive immune systems, this increase is beneficial for preventing stress-related illness.
Nevertheless, no significant differences were observed in the presence of micronuclei, blebbels, and notched cells. The number of binucleated erythrocytes was higher in both the T0 and T3 groups. Responses that are similar to those reported in silver barb (Barbonymus gonionotus) exposed to sublethal concentrations of profenofos for one day [56]. This similarity may indicate that the T0 group experienced a molecular-level change due to the saline stress, while the result in the T3 group could be attributed to excessive arginine intake. It has been reported that a higher incidence of nuclear abnormalities is regarded as a bioindicator of genotoxic events, chromosomal instability, or inadequate DNA repair [17,47,48,56]. These abnormalities are also associated with an increase in ROS resulting from salinity stress. Such processes can compromise cell integrity, leading to an increased presence of nuclear abnormalities [17,56]. Although we did not analyze these bioindicators in our study, they may be a contributing factor to our observations. Furthermore, Fujimoto et al. [54] reported that arginine concentrations greater than 4.1% in the diet (dry weight) can lead to liver necrosis in Nile tilapia. However, insufficient information exists to verify the effects of excessive arginine intake.
No significant differences were found in glucose levels along the dietary treatments. The glucose response to different arginine concentrations is similar to findings reported in Nile tilapia [42] and Nile tilapia GIFT [57], where increased arginine resulted in decreased serum glucose. In the present study, glucose concentrations were slightly higher than those reported in freshwater Mossambica and Nile tilapias [45,50]. Nevertheless, the glucose levels were comparable to those reported in Nile tilapia cultured at 20‰ by Metwaly et al. [50]. The increase in glucose at salinities over 20‰ likely reflects a stress response in Nile tilapia. When under stress, the organism releases catecholamines and cortisol, which stimulate the release of energy substrates through glycolysis [25,36]. As a result, elevated glucose levels and insulin are required to promote the glucose absorption by tissues [58]. An increase in insulin in response to higher arginine availability has been reported in species such as largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) [59], Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) [60], and other salmonids [36]. Likewise, the role of arginine in glucose is associated with the activation of glucose transporter-4 translocation [35], as well as its subsequent oxidation [36,60]. However, further studies are needed to clarify this interaction.
No significant differences were observed in cholesterol levels among the dietary treatments, but triglyceride levels were significantly lower in T1 and higher in T3. The decrease in triglyceride concentrations observed in the T1 and T2 treatments aligns with that reported by Li et al. for the same species [39]. Conversely, organisms fed diets containing 3.1% and 4.5% arginine exhibited reduced triglyceride levels [39]. Nonetheless, there is limited information regarding triglyceride responses at higher arginine concentrations. Triglycerides play a key role in how the body responds to stress, as they serve as the primary energy reserve. During stressful situations, the demand for energy increases, leading to a rise in triglyceride levels. This increase signifies greater energy availability for growth and the maintenance of homeostasis within the organism [39,61].
The T1 diet supplementation resulted in the highest concentrations of total protein, albumin, and globulin. These results are comparable to those observed in Mrigal carp [32] and Nile tilapia GIFT [62], where higher concentrations of these metabolites were noted in diets containing 2.78–3.4% arginine for carp and 1.75–2% of the dry diet for Nile tilapia GIFT. Serum protein is primarily composed of globulin and albumin, which play a crucial role in the immune response [32,45]. Their increase is often related to an increase in the innate immune system, which is consistent with previous reports regarding leukocyte concentration and the role of arginine as an immunostimulant [32].
No statistical differences were observed in molecular markers of the immune system (il-10), stress response (hsp 70), and antioxidant defense (sod). However, cytokine il-10 exhibits a quadratic trend, showing higher il-10 expression in the control group with a tendency to increase in the subsequent diets. This result is similar to that reported in Jian carp [53], where the highest il-10 expression was observed in the basal diet, increasing after reaching an arginine level of 1.61% in the diet on a dry weight basis. The decrease in the expression of this gene indicates that it is expressed after the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines [63], suggesting that excess arginine may lead to tissue necrosis, although further research is needed to confirm this.
The highest levels of sod expression were noted in the T1 and T2 diets, while T0 and T3 had quite similar concentrations. An increase in sod expression with rising dietary arginine has also been reported in species such as the juvenile Chinese mitten crab [33], turbot [37], red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) [35], and common carp (Cyprinus carpio) [41]. hsp 70 expression was followed by a decrease in the T1 and T2 groups and a slight increase in the T3 group. In common carp [41], a diet containing 4–4.63% arginine resulted in underexpression of the hsp 70 gene after exposure to ammonia stress.
Overall, dietary supplementation with L-arginine at moderate concentrations may offer beneficial effects on Nile tilapia cultured in brackish water. However, the molecular-level effects of the T0 and T3 dietary treatments raise concerns about questions regarding the impact of high concentrations. The presence of binuclear aberrations, along with the expression levels of il-10 and hsp 70 at elevated concentrations, suggests a potential stress response in the organism, warranting further investigations to confirm these findings.

5. Conclusions

Supplementing the diet with L-arginine may help reduce the adverse effects of saline stress on Nile tilapia. A diet containing 7–9% arginine relative to total amino acids could improve the growth of Nile tilapia while lowering the feed conversion ratio. Additionally, this supplementation may stimulate their immune system, improving their health under chronic salinity stress. However, further studies are needed to investigate the effects of excessive dietary arginine to determine whether arginine supplementation has similar benefits for other types of abiotic stressors or even higher salinity levels. While this study focused on Nile tilapia, it is advisable to explore dietary L-arginine supplementation in native species to alleviate stress and promote sustainable aquaculture practices that maintain ecosystem integrity.

Author Contributions

A.I.M.-C.: conceptualization, trial conduction, laboratory analysis, data analysis, writing (original draft preparation). M.T.V.: conceptualization, supervision, data analysis, writing (original draft preparation and review). M.V.-A.: supervision, writing (original draft preparation and review). L.E.R.-G.: writing (original draft review). E.S.P.-M.: conceptualization, supervision, trial conduction, laboratory analysis, data analysis, writing (original draft preparation and review). O.B.D.R.-Z.: conceptualization, funding acquisition, project administration, supervision, laboratory analysis, data analysis, writing (original draft preparation and review). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (UABC), project number 403/1/C/13/24.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All procedures in the present study were conducted and authorized according to the UABC animal ethics committee (protocol UABC-IIO 00034/21, approval date: 21 December 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

For access to the data presented in this study, please contact the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Aquamol S.C. de R.L. (Jalisco, Mexico) for providing the experimental animals and the Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación (Secihti) of México for a master scholarship awarded to the first author of this manuscript. Additionally, we would like to express our gratitude to M.C. Aurora Tinajero-Chávez and Eulalio Arambul Muñoz for their efforts during the trial and to Jonathan David Paredes Hernández for his contribution to the statistical analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
Parts per tdousand
RASRecirculation system
GLYGlycine
ArgArginine
CPCrude protein
NFENitrogen-free extract
SGRSpecific growtd rate
FCRFeed conversion ratio
CFCondition factor
SRSurvival rate
HISHepatosomatic index
VSIViscerosomatic index
HbHemoglobin
HctHematocrit
RBCRed blood cell
WBCWhite blood cell
MVCMean corpuscular volume
MCHMean corpuscular hemoglobin
MCHCMean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration
hsp 70Heat shock protein 70
SodSuperoxide dismutase
il-10Interleukin-10

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). El Estado Mundial de La Pesca y La Acuicultura 2024; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Calvin, K.; Dasgupta, D.; Krinner, G.; Mukherji, A.; Thorne, P.W.; Trisos, C.; Romero, J.; Aldunce, P.; Barrett, K.; Blanco, G.; et al. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. In Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Lee, H., Romero, J., Eds.; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Abbass, K.; Qasim, M.Z.; Song, H.; Murshed, M.; Mahmood, H.; Younis, I. A Review of the Global Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation, and Sustainable Mitigation Measures. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 42539–42559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). El Estado Mundial de La Pesca y La Acuicultura 2020; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, Q.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zou, C.; Lin, L. Improvement of Muscle Quality in Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) with Dietary Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.). Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1153323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Evaluación del Estado de Avance de Políticas y Planes de Adaptación al Cambio Climático en la Acuicultura en América Latina y el Caribe; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kombat, E.O.; Zhao, J.; Godwin, A.; Owusu-Afriyie, G.; Birteeb, P.T.; Alhassan, E.H. Metabolic Cost of Acute and Chronic Exposure of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) to Different Levels of Salinity. Aquac. Res. 2021, 52, 6152–6163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Tilapia del Nilo; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2024; Available online: https://www.fao.org/fishery/affris/perfiles-de-las-especies/nile-tilapia/tilapia-del-nilo-pagina-principal/es/ (accessed on 15 April 2025).
  9. Fitzsimmons, K. Oreochromis mossambicus (Mozambique tilapia); CABI Compendium: Wallingford, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Munguti, J.M.; Nairuti, R.; Iteba, J.O.; Obiero, K.O.; Kyule, D.; Opiyo, M.A.; Abwao, J.; Kirimi, J.G.; Outa, N.; Muthoka, M.; et al. Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus, 1758) Culture in Kenya: Emerging Production Technologies and Socio-Economic Impacts on Local Livelihoods. Aquac. Fish Fish. 2022, 2, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tesfahun, A.; Alebachew, S. Food and Feeding Habits of the Nile Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758) from Ribb Reservoir, Lake Tana Sub-Basin, Ethiopia. Cogent Food Agric. 2023, 9, 2212457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Foroutan, B.; Pongtippatee, P.; Kerdmusic, C.; Sirimanapong, W.; Vanichviriyakit, R.; Withyachumnarnkul, B. Myo-Inositol Supplement Helps the Performance of Seawater-Acclimated Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Aquac. Fish. 2024, 9, 597–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rairat, T.; Liu, Y.-K.; Hsu, J.C.-N.; Hsieh, C.-Y.; Chuchird, N.; Chou, C.-C. Combined effects of temperature and salinity on the pharmacokinetics of florfenicol in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) reared in brackish water. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 826586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Larumbe-Morán, E.; Hernández-Vergara, M.P.; Olvera-Novoa, M.A.; Pérez Rostro, C.I. Protein Requirements of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Fry Cultured at Different Salinities. Aquac. Res. 2010, 41, 1150–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Meurer, F.; Novodworski, J.; Bombardelli, R.A. Protein Requirements in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) during Production and Reproduction Phases. Aquac. Fish. 2024, 10, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, L.; Liang, H.; Chama; Ge, X.; Ji, K.; Yu, H.; Huang, D.; Xu, H.; Ren, M. Culture Salinity Alters Dietary Protein Requirement, Whole Body Composition and Nutrients Metabolism Related Genes Expression in Juvenile Genetically Improved Farmed Tilapia (GIFT) (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 2020, 531, 735961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Martins, A.W.S.; Dellagostin, E.N.; Blödorn, E.B.; Silveira, T.L.R.; Sampaio, L.A.; Komninou, E.R.; Varela Junior, A.S.; Corcini, C.D.; Nunes, L.S.; Remião, M.H.; et al. Exposure to salinity induces oxidative damage and changes in the expression of genes related to appetite regulation in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 948228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kombat, E.O.; Abakari, G.; Alhassan, E.H.; Zhao, J.-L. Effect of Acute and Chronic Salinity Exposure on the Amino Acid Composition in Muscle, Intestine and Gill Tissues of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 2023, 570, 739406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Balasch, J.C.; Tort, L. Netting the Stress Responses in Fish. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhou, H.; Yao, T.; Zhang, T.; Sun, M.; Ning, Z.; Chen, Y.; Mu, W. Effects of Chronic Saline-Alkaline Stress on Gill, Liver and Intestinal Histology, Biochemical, and Immune Indexes in Amur Minnow (Phoxinus lagowskii). Aquaculture 2024, 579, 740153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schreck, C.B.; Tort, L. The Concept of Stress in Fish. Fish Physiol. 2016, 35, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sun, S.; Gong, C.; Deng, C.; Yu, H.; Zheng, D.; Wang, L.; Sun, J.; Song, F.; Luo, J. Effects of Salinity Stress on the Growth Performance, Health Status, and Intestinal Microbiota of Juvenile Micropterus Salmoides. Aquaculture 2023, 576, 739888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sánchez-Velázquez, J.; Peña-Herrejón, G.A.; Aguirre-Becerra, H. Fish Responses to Alternative Feeding Ingredients under Abiotic Chronic Stress. Animals 2024, 14, 765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Islam, M.J.; Kunzmann, A.; Henjes, J.; Slater, M.J. Can Dietary Manipulation Mitigate Extreme Warm Stress in Fish? The Case of European Seabass, Dicentrarchus labrax. Aquaculture 2021, 545, 737153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Herrera, M.; Mancera, J.M.; Costas, B. The Use of Dietary Additives in Fish Stress Mitigation: Comparative Endocrine and Physiological Responses. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chakravarty, S.; Prakash, S.; Kumar, S. Role of Dietary Supplements in Stress Amelioration of Teleost Fishes. In Outlook of Climate Change and Fish Nutrition; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 287–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Salamanca, N.; Moreno, O.; Giráldez, I.; Morales, E.; de la Rosa, I.; Herrera, M. Effects of Dietary Phenylalanine and Tyrosine Supplements on the Chronic Stress Response in the Seabream (Sparus aurata). Front. Physiol. 2022, 12, 775771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Herrera, M.; Matias, A.C.; Soares, F.; Ribeiro, L.; Moreira, M.; Salamanca, N.; Jerez-Cepa, I.; Mancera, J.M.; Astola, A. Effect of Amino Acid Supplementation and Stress on Expression of Molecular Markers in Meagre (Argyrosomus regius). Aquaculture 2021, 534, 736238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ciji, A.; Akhtar, M.S. Stress Management in Aquaculture: A Review of Dietary Interventions. Rev. Aquac. 2021, 13, 2190–2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ding, L.; Chen, J.; He, F.; Chen, Q.; Li, Y.; Chen, W. Effects of Dietary Arginine Supplementation on Growth Performance, Antioxidant Capacity, Intestinal Digestive Enzyme Activity, Muscle Transcriptome, and Gut Health of Siniperca chuatsi. Front. Mar. Sci. 2024, 10, 1305192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vijayaram, S.; Ringø, E.; Zuorro, A.; van Doan, H.; Sun, Y. Beneficial Roles of Nutrients as Immunostimulants in Aquaculture: A Review. Aquac. Fish. 2024, 9, 707–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Varghese, T.; Rejish Kumar, V.; Gopan, A.; Valappil, R.K.; Sajina, K.A.; Mishal, P.; Pal, A.K. Dietary Arginine Modulates Nonspecific Immune Responses in Indian Major Carp, Cirrhinus mrigala Exposed to Hypoxia. Aquaculture 2020, 529, 735613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Qi, C.; Wang, X.; Han, F.; Chen, X.; Li, E.; Zhang, M.; Qin, J.G.; Chen, L. Dietary Arginine Alleviates the Oxidative Stress, Inflammation and Immunosuppression of Juvenile Chinese Mitten Crab Eriocheir sinensis under High PH Stress. Aquac. Rep. 2021, 19, 100619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Costas, B.; Conceição, L.E.C.; Dias, J.; Novoa, B.; Figueras, A.; Afonso, A. Dietary Arginine and Repeated Handling Increase Disease Resistance and Modulate Innate Immune Mechanisms of Senegalese Sole (Solea senegalensis Kaup, 1858). Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2011, 31, 838–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, Q.; Xu, Z.; Ai, Q. Arginine Metabolism and Its Functions in Growth, Nutrient Utilization, and Immunonutrition of Fish. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 7, 716–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hoseini, S.M.; Khan, M.A.; Yousefi, M.; Costas, B. Roles of Arginine in Fish Nutrition and Health: Insights for Future Researches. Rev. Aquac. 2020, 12, 2091–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Costas, B.; Rêgo, P.C.N.P.; Conceição, L.E.C.; Dias, J.; Afonso, A. Dietary Arginine Supplementation Decreases Plasma Cortisol Levels and Modulates Immune Mechanisms in Chronically Stressed Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). Aquac. Nutr. 2013, 19, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, S.; Wang, C.; Wu, Z. Dietary L-Arginine Supplementation of Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Alters the Microbial Population and Activates Intestinal Fatty Acid Oxidation. Amino Acids 2021, 54, 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Li, S.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, N.; Chen, J.; Guo, L.; Dai, Z.; Wang, C.; Wu, Z.; Wu, G. Dietary L-Arginine Supplementation Reduces Lipid Accretion by Regulating Fatty Acid Metabolism in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2020, 11, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vianna, R.A.; Chideroli, R.T.; Costa, A.R.; Filho, O.P.R.; Oliveira, L.L.; Donzele, J.L.; Lanna, E.A.T.; Gonçalves, D.D.; Pereira, U.d.P. Effect of Experimental Arginine Supplementation on the Growth, Immunity and Resistance of Tilapia Fingerlings to Streptococcus agalactiae. Aquac. Res. 2020, 51, 1276–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yousefi, M.; Abtahi, B.; Adineh, H.; Hoseinifar, S.H.; Taheri Mirghaed, A.; Paolucci, M.; Van Doan, H. Effects of Dietary Arginine Supplementation on Cytokine- and Antioxidant-Related Gene Expressions in Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio) Fingerling during Ammonia Toxicity. Aquac. Res. 2021, 52, 2751–2758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Neu, D.; Boscolo, W.; Zaminhan, M.; Almeida, F.; Sary, C.; Furuya, W. Growth Performance, Biochemical Responses, and Skeletal Muscle Development of Juvenile Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, Fed with Increasing Levels of Arginine. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2016, 47, 248–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yue, Y.; Zou, Z.; Zhu, J.; Li, D.; Xiao, W.; Han, J.; Yang, H. Effects of Dietary Arginine on Growth Performance, Feed Utilization, Haematological Parameters and Non-Specific Immune Responses of Juvenile Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.). Aquac. Res. 2013, 46, 1801–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official Methods of Analysis; Association of Analytical Chemists: Arlington, VA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  45. Del Rio-Zaragoza, O.B.; Hernández-Rodríguez, M.; Bücle-Ramirez, L.F. Thermal Stress Effect on Tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus (Pisces: Cichlidae) Blood Parameters. Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 2008, 41, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Natt, M.P.; Herrick, C.A. A New Blood Diluent for Counting the Erythrocytes and Leucocytes of the Chicken. Poult. Sci. 1952, 31, 735–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Melo, K.M.; Grisolia, C.K.; Pieczarka, J.C.; de Souza, L.R.; de Souza Filho, J.; Nagamachi, C.Y. FISH in Micronucleus Test Demonstrates Aneugenic Action of Rotenone in a Common Freshwater Fish Species, Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Mutagenesis 2014, 29, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hussain, B.; Sultana, T.; Sultana, S.; Masoud, M.S.; Ahmed, Z.; Mahboob, S. Fish Eco-Genotoxicology: Comet and Micronucleus Assay in Fish Erythrocytes as in Situ Biomarker of Freshwater Pollution. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2017, 25, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mata-Sotres, J.A.; Flores-Salas, C.; Skrzynska, A.K.; Tinajero, A.; Araújo, B.C.; Viana, M.T. Lipid Metabolism in Juvenile of Yellowtail, Seriola dorsalis Fed Diets Containing Different Lipid Levels. Aquaculture 2022, 550, 737870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Metwaly, S.; Nasr, H.; Ahmed, K.; Fathi, M. Multifaceted Stress Response in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Fingerlings: Integrative Analysis of Salinity, Ammonia, and Stocking Density Effects on Growth, Physiology, and Gene Expression. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2025, 51, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Mohamed, N.A.; Saad, M.F.; Shukry, M.; El-Keredy, A.M.; Nasif, O.; Van Doan, H.; Dawood, M.A. Physiological and Ion Changes of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) under the Effect of Salinity Stress. Aquac. Rep. 2020, 19, 100567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Furuya, W.M.; da Cruz, T.P.; Gatlin, D.M. Amino Acid Requirements for Nile Tilapia: An Update. Animals 2023, 13, 900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chen, G.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, J.; Jiang, W.; Kuang, S.; Tang, L.; Tang, W.; Zhang, Y.-A.; Zhou, X.; Feng, L. Effect of Dietary Arginine on the Immune Response and Gene Expression in Head Kidney and Spleen Following Infection of Jian Carp with Aeromonas hydrophila. Fish. Shellfish. Immunol. 2015, 44, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Fujimoto, R.Y.; Santos, R.F.B.; Pala, G.; Gallani, S.U.; Valladão, G.M.R.; Morais, G.C.; Lee, J.T.; Sousa, N.d.C.; Cunha, F.d.S.; Maria, A.N.; et al. Supplementation with Arginine in the Diet of Nile Tilapia Reared in Net Cages. Pesqui. Agropecuária Bras. 2019, 54, e01099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pohlenz, C.; Buentello, A.; Helland, S.l.J.; Gatlin, D.M. Effects of Dietary Arginine Supplementation on Growth, Protein Optimization and Innate Immune Response of Channel Catfish Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque 1818). Aquac. Res. 2012, 45, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Khan, M.M.; Moniruzzaman; Mostakim, G.M.; Khan, M.S.R.; Rahman, K.; Islam, M.S. Aberrations of the Peripheral Erythrocytes and Its Recovery Patterns in a Freshwater Teleost, Silver Barb Exposed to Profenofos. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 234, 830–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Prabu, E.; Felix, N.; Uma, A. Dietary Arginine Requirement in Diets of GIFT Strain of Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus: Effects on Growth Performance, Whole-Body Composition, Growth-Related Gene Expression and Haemato-Biochemical Responses. Aquac. Res. 2021, 52, 4816–4828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Caruso, M.A.; Sheridan, M.A. New Insights into the Signaling System and Function of Insulin in Fish. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2011, 173, 227–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sink, T.D.; Lochmann, R.T. Insulin Response of Largemouth Bass to Glucose, Amino Acid, and Diet Stimulation. North. Am. J. Aquac. 2007, 69, 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Andersen, S.M.; Taylor, R.; Holen, E.; Aksnes, A.; Espe, M. Arginine Supplementation and Exposure Time Affects Polyamine and Glucose Metabolism in Primary Liver Cells Isolated from Atlantic Salmon. Amino Acids 2014, 46, 1225–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ma, S.; Lv, Y.; Hou, L.; Jia, Z.; Lin, S.; Wang, S.; He, X.; Hou, J. Effect of Acute Temperature Stress on Energy Metabolism, Immune Performance and Gut Microbiome of Largemouth Bass (Micropterus Salmoides). Aquac. Fish. 2023, 10, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chuphal, N.; Sardar, P.; Sahu, N.P.; Shamna, N.; Krishnan, S.; Varghese, T.; Malik, M.A.; Maiti, M.K.; Phulia, V. Optimal Level of Dietary Arginine Enhances Growth Performance, Haemato-Biochemical Status, Metabolic Responses and Growth-Related Gene Expression of GIFT Juveniles Reared in Inland Saline Water. Aquaculture 2024, 592, 741219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Huo, H.J.; Chen, S.N.; Li, L.; Nie, P. Functional Characterization of IL-10 and Its Receptor Subunits in a Perciform Fish, the Mandarin Fish, Siniperca chuatsi. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2019, 97, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Polynomial regression analysis of the effects of different arginine inclusions (0, 1, 2, and 3%) on weight gain (A), specific growth rate (B), feed conversion rate (C), and survival rate (D) of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) cultured at 20‰ for 57 days.
Figure 1. Polynomial regression analysis of the effects of different arginine inclusions (0, 1, 2, and 3%) on weight gain (A), specific growth rate (B), feed conversion rate (C), and survival rate (D) of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) cultured at 20‰ for 57 days.
Fishes 10 00387 g001
Figure 2. Polynomial regression analysis of the effects of different L-arginine inclusions (0, 1, 2, and 3%) on relative gene expression of (A) il-10, (B) sod, and (C) hsp 70 in the liver of Nile tilapia (O. niloticus), cultured at 20‰ for 57 days.
Figure 2. Polynomial regression analysis of the effects of different L-arginine inclusions (0, 1, 2, and 3%) on relative gene expression of (A) il-10, (B) sod, and (C) hsp 70 in the liver of Nile tilapia (O. niloticus), cultured at 20‰ for 57 days.
Fishes 10 00387 g002
Table 1. Ingredient composition and proximate analysis of experimental diets with different arginine levels to feed Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). The arginine content in the diet was calculated from the arginine content of the ingredients, which LINDEAACUA previously analyzed.
Table 1. Ingredient composition and proximate analysis of experimental diets with different arginine levels to feed Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). The arginine content in the diet was calculated from the arginine content of the ingredients, which LINDEAACUA previously analyzed.
Treatments
IngredientsT0T1T2T3
Poultry byproducts meal (68% CP) a10101010
Bovine byproducts meal (50% CP) a10101010
Fish meal (70% CP) b24242424
Corn gluten meal (65% CP) c10101010
Corn starch d28.328.328.328.3
Glycine e3210
Arginine e0123
Beef tallow f2.52.52.52.5
DHA Nature TM (24% DHA) g5555
Gelatin h2.52.52.52.5
Methionine e1111
Rovimix i3333
Taurine j0.10.10.10.1
Stay c k0.50.50.50.5
TOTAL100100100100
Arginine on diet (%)2.63.64.65.6
Arginine on crude protein (%)4.35.917.549.16
Proximal composition (%)
Crude protein45.7245.5244.9245.83
Crude fat10.4010.5710.3510.46
Ash10.5810.0610.0610.23
NFE34.9533.8535.1633.46
NFE (%) = 100 − (% crude protein + % crude fat + % ash). a Pet food grade (65% CP) Scoular de México S. de R.L. de C.V. Originally from the USA (National Renderers Association); b Baja Marine Foods S.A.P.I. de C.V., El Sauzal de Rodríguez, Ensenada, Baja California, México; c INGREDION S.A. de C.V., México, 65% CP; d Maicena™, Unilever Food Solutions, México; e Future Foods, México; f Kindly donated by Grasas y Derivados de Tijuana; g kindly donated by ADM; h Progel Mexicana SA de CV, León, Guanajuato, México (commercial grade, 85% CP); i la vitamin and mineral mixture from DSM; j NUBIOT S.A. de C.V., Mexico; k Stay C from DSM.
Table 2. Primer sequences used for the real-time PCR.
Table 2. Primer sequences used for the real-time PCR.
GeneForward Sequence (5′-3′)Reverse Sequence (5′-3′)eNCBI Reference
hsp 70CCGGTTTGATGACACAGTTGCGAGGTAGGCTTCAGCAATC0.94XM_023404852
sodGACGTGACAACACAGGTTGCTACAGCCACCGTAACAGCAG0.95XM_003449940.5
il-10CTGCTAGATCAGTCCGTCGAAGCAGAACCGTGTCCAGGTAA0.99XM_013269189.3
Β-actinTGGTGGGTATGGGTCAGAAAGCTGTTGGCTTTGGGGTTCA0.96ENSONIG00000008505
e = primer efficiency values.
Table 3. Productive performance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fed diets with different levels of L-arginine (0, 1, 2, and 3%) and cultured at 20‰ for 57 days. Data are mean ± SD.
Table 3. Productive performance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fed diets with different levels of L-arginine (0, 1, 2, and 3%) and cultured at 20‰ for 57 days. Data are mean ± SD.
TreatmentsInitial Weight
(g)
Final Weight
(g)
Final Length (cm)Weight Gain (g)Specific Growth Rate
(%/d)
Feed Conversion RatioSurvival Rate
(%)
T04.06 ± 0.76 a48.03 ± 19.17 a13.43 ± 1.82 a42.53 ± 4.38 a4.27 ± 0.15 a1.23 ± 0.08 a76.0 ± 4.00 a
T14.05 ± 0.76 a56.14 ± 23.09 a13.96 ± 1.95 a44.4 ± 3.23 ab4.35 ± 0.13 ab1.25 ± 0.02 a83.7 ± 0.38 ab
T24.05 ± 0.73 a45.87 ± 9.25 a13.43 ± 1.11 a48.34 ± 0.43 ab4.49 ± 0.02 ab1.16 ± 0.04 a94.0 ± 2.82 b
T34.01 ± 0.66 a68.16 ± 18.98 a14.91 ± 1.39 a52.44 ± 3.84 b4.63± 0.11 b1.05 ± 0.09 a76.0 ± 8.00 a
p-value0.44 A0.09 A0.24 K0.04 A0.04 A0.24 K0.01 A
Regressions
Orthogonal contrast
Lineal (p-value) 0.010.0070.100.84
Quadratic (p-value) 0.050.0040.160.46
Lineal (R2) 0.970.980.790.02
Quadratic (R2) 0.990.990.980.78
Best model Lineal pLineal tQuadratic rQuadratic r
Superscript letters show differences between the same column (p < 0.05). Superscript A or K letters in p-values represent ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis analysis, respectively. p = Based on p-value, r = Based on R2. t = Based on P and R2.
Table 4. Biological indices of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fed diets with different levels of L-arginine (0, 1, 2, and 3%) and cultured at 20‰ for 57 days. Data are mean ± SD.
Table 4. Biological indices of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fed diets with different levels of L-arginine (0, 1, 2, and 3%) and cultured at 20‰ for 57 days. Data are mean ± SD.
TreatmentsHepatosomatic IndexVisceral IndexCondition Index
T02.16 ± 0.47 a12.65 ± 1.60 a1.86 ± 0.15 a
T12.18 ± 0.87 a13.55 ± 1.05 a1.99 ± 0.39 a
T21.8 ± 0.43 a13.72 ± 1.92 a1.88 ± 0.15 a
T32.29 ± 0.34 a13.30 ± 2.36 a2.01 ± 0.22 a
p-value0.25 K0.63 K0.54 K
Regressions
Orthogonal contrast
Lineal (p-value)0.990.410.42
Quadratic (p-value)0.770.030.81
Lineal (R2)0.000.330.33
Quadratic (R2)0.770.990.33
Best modelQuadratic rQuadratic tNone
Superscript letters show differences between the same column (p < 0.05). Superscript K letters in p-values represent Kruskal–Wallis analysis. r = Based on R2. t = Based on P and R2.
Table 5. Blood hematological values of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fed diets with different levels of L-arginine (0, 1, 2, and 3%) and cultured at 20‰ for 57 days. Data are mean ± SD.
Table 5. Blood hematological values of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fed diets with different levels of L-arginine (0, 1, 2, and 3%) and cultured at 20‰ for 57 days. Data are mean ± SD.
TreatmentsHb
(g/dL)
Hct
(%)
RBC
(×106/mm3)
WBC
(×103/mm3)
MCV
(fL)
MCH
(pg)
MCHC (g/dL)
T06.76 ± 1.37 a23.88 ± 5.79 a1.39 ± 0.55 a11.20 ± 2.11 a183.21 ± 37.82 b53.41 ± 17.11 a28.88 ± 4.80 a
T18.15 ± 0.92 b28.10 ± 4.13 a1.59 ± 0.24 a12.40 ± 1.13 ab179.91 ± 39.41 b52.22 ± 10.62 a29.30 ± 3.10 a
T28.16 ± 0.53 b23.50 ± 2.66 a1.77 ± 0.22 a13.00 ± 0.58 ab134.18 ± 20.05 a46.69 ± 6.18 a34.90 ± 1.60 b
T38.25 ± 0.56 b25.00 ± 4.20 a1.80 ± 0.27 a13.60 ± 0.99 b140.87 ± 32.25 a46.55 ± 7.82 a34.20 ± 8.80 ab
p-value0.01 A0.14 K0.16 K0.02 K0.02 K0.67 K0.02 K
Regressions
Orthogonal contrast
Lineal (p-value)0.190.920.030.010.120.060.12
Quadratic (p-value)0.260.920.080.070.470.340.46
Lineal (R2)0.650.010.920.960.750.870.77
Quadratic (R2)0.930.140.990.990.770.880.78
Best modelQuadratic rNoneLineal pLineal pQuadratic rQuadratic rQuadratic r
Superscript letters show differences between the same column (p < 0.05). Superscript A or K letters in p-values represent ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis analysis, respectively. p = Based on p-value, r = Based on R2. t = Based on P and R2.
Table 6. Blood cell types (leukocytes and thrombocytes) of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fed diets with different levels of L-arginine (0, 1, 2, and 3%) and cultured at 20‰ for 57 days. Data are mean ± SD.
Table 6. Blood cell types (leukocytes and thrombocytes) of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fed diets with different levels of L-arginine (0, 1, 2, and 3%) and cultured at 20‰ for 57 days. Data are mean ± SD.
TreatmentsLymphocytes (%)Monocytes
(%)
Neutrophils
(%)
Basophil
(%)
Eosinophils (%)Thrombocytes (%)
T064.95 ± 13.73 a27.25 ± 9.19 b7.42 ± 5.91 a0.00 ± 0.00 a1.16 ± 0.55 a75.78 ± 6.14 b
T157.54 ± 14.18 a29.23 ± 11.62 b11.43 ± 5.18 a0.19 ± 0.40 a2.55 ± 1.05 a66.25 ± 6.14 a
T275.50 ± 10.69 b16.79 ± 4.51 a7.70 ± 7.002 a0.00 ± 0.00 a0.00 ± 0.00 a66.36 ± 5.77 a
T361.57 ± 19.49 a27.77 ± 12.29 b8.92 ± 7.13 a0.29 ± 0.47 a2.69 ± 1.62 a59.71 ± 5.86 a
p-value0.037 K0.01 K0.166 K0.07 K1.00 K0.00 A
Regressions
Orthogonal contrast
Lineal (p-value)0.860.750.940.390.790.06
Quadratic (p-value)0.960.850.860.760.930.32
Lineal (R2)0.010.060.000.360.040.88
Quadratic (R2)0.070.260.190.400.130.89
Best modelNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneQuadratic r
Superscript letters show differences between the same column (p < 0.05). Superscript A or K letters in p-values represent ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis analysis, respectively. The lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, basophils, and eosinophils are in percent of each of the leukocyte cellular types, without thrombocytes. Thrombocytes are the percentage of total leukocytes and the thrombocyte count. r = Based on R2.
Table 7. Micronucleus and nuclear aberrations of erythrocytes of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fed diets with different levels of arginine (0, 1, 2, and 3%) and cultured at 20‰ for 57 days. Data are mean ± SD.
Table 7. Micronucleus and nuclear aberrations of erythrocytes of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fed diets with different levels of arginine (0, 1, 2, and 3%) and cultured at 20‰ for 57 days. Data are mean ± SD.
TreatmentsMicronucleus
(%)
Binucleated (%)Blebbel
(%)
Notched
(%)
T00.488 ± 0.25 a0.33 ± 0.14 b0.60 ± 0.47 a 2.95 ± 2.01 a
T10.190 ± 0.01 a0.20 ± 0.00 a0.31 ± 0.14 a2.23 ± 2.19 a
T20.197 ± 0.01 a0.50 ± 0.50 ab0.28 ± 0.22 a2.71 ± 1.32 a
T30.177 ± 0.04 a0.42 ± 0.26 b0.35 ± 0.27 a 2.47 ± 1.76 a
p-value 0.13 K0.03 K0.09 K0.22 A
Regressions
Orthogonal contrast
Lineal (p-value)0.520.420.310.6
Quadratic (p-value)0.570.810.140.8
Lineal (R2)0.220.320.470.16
Quadratic (R2)0.660.330.980.36
Best modelNoneNoneQuadratic rNone
Superscript letters show differences between the same column (p < 0.05). Superscript A or K letters in p-values represent ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis analysis, respectively. r = Based on R2.
Table 8. Serum biochemistry of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fed diets with different levels of L-arginine (0, 1, 2, and 3%) and cultured at 20‰ for 57 days. Data are mean ± SD.
Table 8. Serum biochemistry of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fed diets with different levels of L-arginine (0, 1, 2, and 3%) and cultured at 20‰ for 57 days. Data are mean ± SD.
TreatmentsCholesterol (mg/dL)Triglycerides (mg/dL)Glucose (mg/dL) Total Protein (g/dL)Globulin (g/dL)albumin (g/dL)
T0106.99 ± 12.72 a138.26 ± 55.86 ab105.85 ± 24.65 a2.68 ± 0.37 bc1.39 ± 0.39 ab1.26 ± 0.26 ab
T1100.83 ± 14.31 a115.93 ± 39.98 a92.17 ± 20.78 a3.17 ± 0.59 b1.78 ± 0.48 b1.38 ± 0.17 a
T294.89 ± 11.61 a120.87 ± 45.25 ab93.59 ± 18.63 a2.22 ± 0.49 a1.13 ± 0.54 a1.08 ± 0.13 b
T397.63 ± 17.61 a182.75 ± 99.97 b93.72 ± 27.76 a2.74 ± 0.56 bc1.41 ± 0.36 ab1.32 ± 0.24 a
p-value 0.10 K0.04 K0.48 K0.00 K0.00 A0.00 K
Regressions
Orthogonal contrast
Lineal (p-value)0.150.410.290.740.710.88
Quadratic (p-value)0.200.120.330.9660.950.95
Lineal (R2)0.710.340.500.060.080.01
Quadratic (R2)0.950.980.890.060.090.08
Best modelQuadratic rQuadratic r Quadratic rNoneNoneNone
Superscript letters show differences between the same column (p < 0.05). Superscript A or K letters in p-values represent ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis analysis, respectively. r = Based on R2.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Munguía-Casillas, A.I.; Viana, M.T.; Vivanco-Aranda, M.; Ruiz-González, L.E.; Peña-Marín, E.S.; Del Rio-Zaragoza, O.B. L-Arginine Effect as an Additive on Overall Performance, Health Status, and Expression of Stress Molecular Markers in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Under Chronic Salinity Exposure. Fishes 2025, 10, 387. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10080387

AMA Style

Munguía-Casillas AI, Viana MT, Vivanco-Aranda M, Ruiz-González LE, Peña-Marín ES, Del Rio-Zaragoza OB. L-Arginine Effect as an Additive on Overall Performance, Health Status, and Expression of Stress Molecular Markers in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Under Chronic Salinity Exposure. Fishes. 2025; 10(8):387. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10080387

Chicago/Turabian Style

Munguía-Casillas, Andrea Itzel, María Teresa Viana, Miroslava Vivanco-Aranda, Luis Eduardo Ruiz-González, Emyr Saul Peña-Marín, and Oscar Basilio Del Rio-Zaragoza. 2025. "L-Arginine Effect as an Additive on Overall Performance, Health Status, and Expression of Stress Molecular Markers in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Under Chronic Salinity Exposure" Fishes 10, no. 8: 387. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10080387

APA Style

Munguía-Casillas, A. I., Viana, M. T., Vivanco-Aranda, M., Ruiz-González, L. E., Peña-Marín, E. S., & Del Rio-Zaragoza, O. B. (2025). L-Arginine Effect as an Additive on Overall Performance, Health Status, and Expression of Stress Molecular Markers in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Under Chronic Salinity Exposure. Fishes, 10(8), 387. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10080387

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop