Next Article in Journal
Effects of Powdered Salmon Roe Processing Liquid on Enhancing the Palatability of Tuna By-Product Meal-Based Diets in Greater Amberjack (Seriola dumerili)
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization and Analysis of the Role of Corazonin in Regulating Ovarian Development in the Mud Crab Scylla paramamosain
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Content of Short-Lived Radionuclides (95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru) in Fish

by
Nataliia E. Zarubina
1,*,
Vladislav Semak
2,* and
Liliia P. Ponomarenko
3
1
Institute for Nuclear Research, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 03028 Kyiv, Ukraine
2
Center for Biomedical Technology, Department for Biomedical Research, University for Continuing Education Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria
3
Department of Physics and Mathematics, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, 03056 Kyiv, Ukraine
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fishes 2025, 10(7), 330; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10070330
Submission received: 28 May 2025 / Revised: 24 June 2025 / Accepted: 2 July 2025 / Published: 4 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Biology and Ecology)

Abstract

This review addresses the intake, distribution, and bioaccumulation of the short-lived radionuclides 95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru in aquatic ecosystems before and after the 1986 accident at the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant. Particular attention is given to a detailed analysis of these processes in fish belonging to different ecological groups, as well as in their various organs and tissues. Observational data indicate that 95Zr and 95Nb predominantly accumulate in external organs, with comparatively lower concentrations observed in internal organs. In contrast, 103Ru and 106Ru exhibit higher bioavailability and a marked tendency to accumulate in internal tissues. A notable feature of 106Ru is its gradual increase in muscle tissue over time following the accident. These findings are critical for advancing our understanding and assessment of the ecological status of contaminated aquatic environments, for predicting the long-term impacts of accidental radionuclide release, and for informing strategies related to environmental monitoring and the safe exploitation of aquatic biological resources.
Key Contribution: Different bioaccumulation patterns of 95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru were observed in fish. Radionuclide accumulation intensity varies among fish species and depends on their feeding type and morphophysiological adaptations, with the highest concentrations consistently observed in omnivorous and planktivorous species.

1. Introduction

Input of 95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru into Aquatic Ecosystems Before the 1986 Chornobyl NPP Accident
95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru are among the environmentally significant radionuclides produced via neutron-induced fission of 235U, 239Pu, or 238U [1]. These radionuclides have short half-lives: 95Zr, 64 days; 95Nb, 35 days; 103Ru, 39.3 days; and 106Ru, 374.5 days [2]. The short half-life of these radionuclides restricts the duration available for experimental observation and data collection, thereby complicating long-term monitoring and impeding a comprehensive analysis of their behavior in aquatic ecosystems.
The IAEA-WOMARS study categorizes anthropogenic marine radionuclides into two groups based on their biogeochemical behavior: conservative and particle-reactive radionuclides [3]. Conservative radionuclides (those mobile in water) are highly soluble in seawater, and their redistribution upon entering the ocean is primarily determined by physical processes related to mixing and diffusion (e.g., 3H, 14C, 90Sr, 129I, 137Cs). In contrast, particle-reactive radionuclides (those associated with particles) penetrate more rapidly into deeper layers and underlying sediments. This group includes radionuclides such as 106Ru, 144Ce, and 239,240Pu.
The selection of radionuclides 95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru for investigation is driven by a set of key factors that determine their ecological, physicochemical, and biological relevance to aquatic ecosystems:
  • Their presence serves as an indicator of anthropogenic radioactive contamination of the aquatic environment, both during accidental releases and routine discharges from nuclear fuel cycle facilities.
  • They have differing biogeochemical behavior. All these radionuclides are particle-reactive, yet they exhibit varying degrees of solubility and bioavailability. Studying these differences enables the assessment of how contamination affects trophic interactions and radionuclide dynamics in aquatic environments.
  • The presence or absence of these radionuclides in different organs of aquatic organisms enables evaluation of the risk levels across various trophic levels, identification of uptake pathways, and assessment of the effectiveness of natural detoxification mechanisms.
  • Particular importance is attributed to the assessment of potential health risks associated with the consumption of fish and other aquatic organisms exposed to these radionuclides.
Upon entering aquatic ecosystems (primarily as particles), 95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru serve initially only as external sources of radiation exposure for aquatic plants. However, the digestive systems of invertebrates and fish are capable of breaking down such particles, allowing the radionuclides to become soluble and be incorporated into the tissues of organisms [4].
Prior to the Chornobyl accident, 95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru entered aquatic ecosystems via multiple pathways: global fallout from nuclear weapons testing, nuclear facility accidents, authorized disposal of nuclear waste, and wastewater discharges from nuclear fuel cycle operations and weapons production. Approximately 85 × 1015 Bq of various radionuclides were dumped into the oceans at more than 80 locations worldwide. Between 1946 and 1982, five countries—including Belgium, Japan, the former Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and the United States—routinely used at-sea disposal as a method of nuclear waste management. During this period, approximately 46 × 1015 Bq of low-level nuclear waste, including 95Zr, 95Nb, and 106Ru, were disposed of at sea [1]. Another source of radionuclide input into aquatic ecosystems was the use of nuclear energy for excavations of harbors, dams, and reservoirs [5]. The biological consequences of these nuclear releases depend on the quantity and nature of the radioactivity generated, which in turn depend on the design and size of the nuclear device, the specific detonation conditions (locally extremely high temperatures and pressures), and the characteristics of the detonation medium.
As expected, the impact of short-lived radionuclides on the ecosystem is most significant in the early stages, as their concentrations decrease significantly due to physical decay and environmental dispersion [5].
Beginning in the late 1960s and early 1970s, research began to be conducted focusing on the ecological impact of 95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru, which had been introduced into aquatic ecosystems through global fallout, accidents, and waste disposal from nuclear facilities. However, there is a limited amount of available data regarding the accumulation of 95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru in fish. Therefore, we have systematically reviewed all the existing literature dedicated to the accumulation of these radionuclides in aquatic ecosystems.
Regular monitoring studies of radionuclides such as 137Cs and 106Ru in the surface and coastal waters of the British and Channel Islands were not initiated until 1967 [6], even though radioactive liquid effluents from the British Nuclear Fuels reprocessing plant at Sellafield, Cumbria (UK), had been discharged into the Irish Sea via pipeline since 1952. 106Ru was the dominant radionuclide present in the effluent. The authors of this study reported that 95Zr, 95Nb, and 106Ru in the effluent are particle-reactive radionuclides.
As a result of these discharges, 106Ru activity exceeding 100,000 Bq/kg dry weight was recorded in surface sediments of the Irish Sea in 1968 and 1972. In bottom sediments, significant quantities of 95Zr and 95Nb were also detected, resulting from discharges in the late 1960s and early 1970s. In 1968, one sample contained more than 500,000 Bq/kg dry weight of these radionuclides [7].
Analysis of radionuclide content in various organs and tissues of mollusks has shown that the parts of the animal exposed to the external environment are more contaminated than internal tissues [8]. In 1969, near Windscale, only two isotopes of cesium with traces of 106Ru were detected in the flesh of Pleuronectes platessa (Linnaeus, 1758) collected near the pipeline, whereas 106Ru along with traces of 95Zr/95Nb was detected in the remnants of fish muscle tissue filets. Different species of benthic organisms were found to contain 106Ru in concentrations ranging from 6.3 to 591.5 pCi/g (233 to 21,900 Bq/kg) fresh weight and 95Zr/95Nb in concentrations ranging from <1.0 to 1043.0 pCi/g (up to 38,600 Bq/kg) fresh weight. The authors also suggested that zirconium, niobium, and ruthenium do not accumulate through the food chain [9]. In 1970, in the vicinity of Windscale, zirconium, niobium, and ruthenium were almost undetectable in fish of various species. In the muscle tissue of P. platessa, 106Ru was detected at levels below 0.1 pCi/g (3.7 Bq/kg) fresh weight. 95Zr/95Nb in amounts ranging from 9 to 281 pCi/g (330 to 10,400 Bq/kg) fresh weight and 106Ru in amounts ranging from 0.0 to 60 pCi/g (up to 2220 Bq/kg) fresh weight were found in the muscle tissue of crustaceans [10].
The accumulation of gamma-emitting radionuclides by the mussel Mytilus edulis (Linnaeus, 1758) and the periwinkle Littorina littorea (Linnaeus, 1758) was investigated in the vicinity of the Sellafield plant [11]. In Ravenglass mussels sampled in 1983, the concentration of 95Nb was lowest in the shell (scraped), measured at 17 Bq/kg dry weight, and highest in the byssal threads, measured at 6110 Bq/kg dry weight. The distribution of niobium among the organs can be ranked as follows: byssal threads > viscera > periostracum > gills > muscle > mantle edge > shell. The distribution pattern of 106Ru in the organs of Ravenglass mussels differed from that of niobium. The lowest concentration of 106Ru was recorded in the mantle at 770 Bq/kg dry weight, where 95Nb was not detected. The highest concentration was observed in the viscera, reaching 16,000 Bq/kg dry weight. The distribution of 106Ru in mussel organs followed this order: viscera > byssal threads > gills > periostracum > mantle edge > muscle > mantle. Ruthenium was not detected in the shell.
Berg and Ginsberg [12], in 1972, investigated the accumulation of 106Ru by crayfish (Orconectes obscurus (Hagen, 1870) and Cambarus robustus (Girard, 1852)) in streams contaminated with radioactive waste in West Valley, New York (USA). In samples collected in 1972, 106Ru accounted for more than 90% of the total gamma radioactivity and was found in higher concentrations in crayfish compared to fish from the same sampling sites. Most of the ruthenium in crayfish organisms was associated with the exoskeleton, where it was distributed proportionally to the surface area of the integumentary system. Ruthenium levels in large muscle groups represented only a small fraction of the total body concentration. Although the digestive gland accounted for only 7% of body weight, it retained 29% of the total body burden of ruthenium. In Butlermilk Creek and Cattaraugus Creek, 106Ru concentrations in crayfish were 20 and 61 nCi/kg (740 and 2257 Bq/kg), respectively. Fish from these same water bodies did not accumulate ruthenium to the same extent as crayfish. More than half of the fish samples contained no detectable 106Ru, and the concentrations in fish ranged from 0 to 3.7 nCi/kg (0 to 137 Bq/kg).
Martin and Thomas summarized the transport of radionuclides from the Rhône River to the Mediterranean Sea during the period from 1982 to 1985 [13]. The principal source of radioactive isotopes entering the river was the Marcoule reprocessing plant. It was found that, in suspended matter collected in the Rhône delta, the maximum concentration of 95Zr was <40.7 Bq/kg dry weight. Concentrations of 106Ru reached up to 180 Bq/kg dry weight, and 103Ru up to 22.2 Bq/kg dry weight. In sediments, the concentrations were significantly lower: 95Zr at 4.7 Bq/kg dry weight, 106Ru up to 109.2 Bq/kg dry weight, and 103Ru up to 2.29 Bq/kg dry weight. The authors noted that it is not always possible to distinguish between radionuclide inputs from the Marcoule reprocessing facility and those resulting from atmospheric deposition.
As reported in [14], during a large-scale investigation of radionuclide contamination in the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea in 1981–1982, the average concentration of 106Ru in coastal seawater was 16.7 Bq/m3. The average concentrations of 106Ru in different marine organisms were as follows: 0.40 Bq/kg in fish muscle, 0.17 Bq/kg in mollusks, 0.20 Bq/kg in shrimp and crabs, and 0.89 Bq/kg in the algae Laminaria japonica (Areschoug, 1851) (all values given in fresh weight). In the bottom sediments of the Bohai Sea in 1981, the average concentration of this radionuclide was 20 Bq/kg dry weight.
Coughtrey and Thorne [15] indicated that 95Zr can be significantly accumulated by filter-feeding or sediment-dwelling invertebrates. Most of the accumulated activity is associated with the exoskeleton, followed by the gills and digestive glands. In Anodonta cygnea (Linnaeus, 1758), 93.5% of the 95Nb activity in the whole organism was attributable to the shell, while 48% of the total activity in soft tissues was concentrated in the gills, 31.2% in the visceral mass, 12.5% in the mantle, and 8.3% in the muscle. Mollusks accumulate radioactive isotopes of ruthenium in their guts and external organs. More than 50% of all 103Ru and 106Ru accumulated by mollusks is retained in the exoskeleton, and likely less than 15% of the radionuclide load in soft tissues is retained in the muscle. In fish Thunnus thynnus (Linnaeus, 1758), the highest activity of 106Ru was recorded in the liver, measured at 139 pCi/g (5100 Bq/kg) fresh weight. The sequence of 106Ru content in T. thynnus was as follows: liver > kidney > gills > bone > dark muscles > pyloric caeca > light muscles. 106Ru was not detected in the skin, scales, heart, stomach, spleen, intestinal contents, stomach contents, or gonads of this species.
Studies of the accumulation of 95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru were conducted under laboratory conditions before the Chornobyl accident. The authors of [5] investigated the accumulation of 95Zr/95Nb, 103Ru, and other radionuclides by aquatic organisms using a system of continuous recirculation of aquarium water through a column containing sediment material derived from the nuclear cratering event “Cabriolet” (solid debris from the 2-kiloton Plowshare crater explosion conducted in hard rock). Twenty days after the start of the experiment, the concentration of 103Ru in the soft tissues of freshwater bivalves reached 6200 pCi/kg (229.4 Bq/kg). This radionuclide was not recorded in the muscles of crustaceans; however, it was detected in the viscera at 39,000 pCi/kg (1443 Bq/kg). In freshwater fish, 103Ru was not recorded after 20 days. In marine animals, 103Ru was detected in the following concentrations: for bivalves, soft tissues—1700 pCi/kg (62.9 Bq/kg); for crustaceans, muscles—1400 pCi/kg (51.8 Bq/kg), internal organs—14,000 pCi/kg (518 Bq/kg); for fish, muscle—not detected, non-muscle tissues—1800 pCi/kg (66.7 Bq/kg), whole body—1700 pCi/kg (62.9 Bq/kg). The radionuclides 95Zr and 95Nb were rarely, if ever, detected in water samples or aquatic fauna.
The study [16] presents experimental data on the bioaccumulation and depuration kinetics of 95Zr and 95Nb in a seawater/fish system under controlled laboratory conditions. More than 60% of the total content of 95Zr and 95Nb in Acanthogobius flavimanus (Temminck & Schlegel, 1845) was concentrated in internal organs, mainly in the digestive tract, which may be considered an external organ since marine fishes must absorb significant amounts of seawater (8–55% of body weight per day) to maintain osmotic balance between their internal environment and the seawater. The 95Zr content in external tissues (gills, fins, skin) was significantly higher than in internal tissues (muscle, blood, liver, and bone).
Experimental studies on the uptake and accumulation of 106Ru by Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum, 1792) were conducted to obtain information on radioecological concentration during fish egg development and larval growth. The highest activity of 106Ru (30,000 cpm/g) was observed in eyed eggs treated with a solution of ruthenium-containing salt (106Ru chloro complexes, product code RKS-2, from The Radiochemical Centre at Amersham, United Kingdom). In fry, the highest concentration was recorded in the visceral mass at 600 cpm/g, while the lowest was found in muscle tissue at 18 cpm/g. The sequence of 106Ru concentrations in fry was as follows: viscera (including digestive tract) > liver > gills > skin > bones > muscles [17]. When the roe of Salmo gairdneri irideus (a synonym for O. mykiss) was separated into egg capsule, embryo, and yolk, the majority of 106Ru was associated with the egg capsule [18].
The uptake of 106Ru by freshwater organisms was studied in an aquarium ecosystem consisting of natural river water, duckweeds, mud snails, river snails, freshwater mussels, and crucian carp (Carassius carassius (Linnaeus, 1758)), as well as bottom sediments [19]. The mean concentration ratios of 106Ru in the organisms demonstrated a decreasing trend in the following order: duckweeds > mud snails > river snails > freshwater mussels > C. carassius. In C. carassius, approximately 80% of the total radioactivity was concentrated in the visceral mass, including the digestive tract.
As previously discussed, 95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru can enter aquatic environments through various pathways. The contamination of aquatic ecosystems raises significant concerns regarding ecological integrity and public health. Particularly important is the need to assess the potential health risks associated with the consumption of fish and other aquatic organisms exposed to these radionuclides. This issue remains especially relevant in regions where local communities rely heavily on aquatic resources for nutrition and economic stability.

2. Methodology

2.1. Literature Sources and Search Strategy

The primary sources of literature used in this review were the scientific databases Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The search process employed standard Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) to refine results. Key search terms included bioaccumulation, fish, content, radioactive element, radionuclides, zirconium, niobium, ruthenium, Chernobyl, Chornobyl, nuclear testing, global fallout, water contamination, mining, ecological half-life, and nuclear facilities. Additionally, older publications from national scientific journals were accessed through the library of the Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in Kyiv.

2.2. Observational Data Collection and Analytical Procedures

To support the discussion of research findings, illustrative observational data are provided in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5. These data were collected as part of routine environmental monitoring of the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant (ChNPP) Cooling Pond and the Kaniv Reservoir on the Dnipro River, in the section between the village of Staiky and the town of Rzhyshchiv (see Figure 1 and Figure 2). Samples were obtained from water, aquatic plants, mollusks, and fish. Sampling methods, sample preparation procedures, and radionuclide analyses were performed as previously described [20].
Historically (in the 1960s–1970s), biological samples were commonly ashed prior to radionuclide analysis. However, this method has been shown to cause substantial loss of short-lived radionuclides, leading to false-negative results [21,22]. Therefore, in the present study, the specific activities of 95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru were determined using fresh (non-ashed) tissue samples. All activity concentrations were calculated on a fresh weight basis.

3. Impact of the Chornobyl Nuclear Accident on the Cooling Pond of Chornobyl NPP and Kaniv Reservoir

As a result of the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant (ChNPP) accident in April 1986, approximately 1.95 × 1018 Bq of radioactive substances were released into the environment. In aquatic ecosystems, during the first days following the accident, the predominant contaminant was the short-lived radioisotope 131I. As this nuclide decayed, the dominant contributors to water radioactivity became 89Sr, 95Zr, 103Ru, 140Ba, 141Ce, and 144Ce, with 134Cs and 137Cs playing a lesser role. From mid-June to late June 1986, the principal radionuclides detected in water were 90Sr, 134Cs, 137Cs, 238Pu, 239Pu, 240Pu, and 241Am. Among aquatic bodies, the ChNPP Cooling Pond was the most contaminated by radionuclides following the accident. In the early phase, the primary contributors to contamination were 131I, 95Zr, and 144Ce. The total radionuclide activity in the water reached 3.7 × 105 Bq/dm3. Between July and August 1986, the predominant radionuclides in the Cooling Pond water were 134Cs and 137Cs, alongside detectable levels of 95Zr, 103Ru, 141Ce, and 144Ce. In algae, a broader spectrum of radionuclides was identified, including 60Co, 90Sr, 95Zr, 103Ru, 106Ru, 131I, 134Cs, 137Cs, 141Ce, 144Ce, and others in lower concentrations. In August 1986, the total activity of gamma-emitting radionuclides in algal biomass reached 2.5 × 106Bq/kg, fresh weight, and by August 1987, it had decreased to 0.7 × 106 Bq/kg [4].
It is estimated that 3.3% of the total 95Zr inventory in the reactor core was released as a result of the accident, amounting to 1.4 × 1017 Bq [23,24]. During the initial release phase of the Chornobyl Unit 4 reactor accident, 95Zr constituted a notably significant fraction of the radionuclide inventory in comparison to other isotopes. Nearly all of the released 95Zr was likely in the form of ‘hot particles’ (fuel particles) [25,26,27]. Similarly, 103Ru was released at a rate of 2.9% of its reactor core inventory, corresponding to 1.184 × 1017 Bq (3.2 MKi) [23,24,28]. This represented a substantial contribution relative to many other isotopes. The total release of 106Ru into the environment amounted to 5.92 × 1016 Bq [23,24,28]. Over 90% of the released activity of both 103Ru and 106Ru is attributed to nuclear ‘hot particles‘ originating from the reactor core [29].

4. Radionuclide Contamination in Chornobyl NPP Cooling Pond and Kaniv Reservoir: Effects on Water and Aquatic Biota

Zirconium (95Zr): Before 1986, this radionuclide was intermittently detected in vegetation and bottom sediments of the Chornobyl NPP Cooling Pond, with levels never exceeding 50 Bq/kg dry weight [30].
Following the Chornobyl accident, the highest concentrations of 95Zr were recorded in species of the genus Potamogeton, reaching up to 1,000,000 Bq/kg dry weight in aquatic vegetation within the Cooling Pond. The concentration of this radionuclide in filamentous algae (Cladophora spp.) was slightly lower, at 680,000 Bq/kg dry weight. 95Zr was identified in this algae species from 1986 to 1988 (Figure 3), with the last detection of 95Zr in Cladophora spp. in the Kaniv Reservoir occurring in 1987 (Figure 4). The rapid decline of 95Zr activity in aquatic vegetation is likely due to its short physical half-life rather than biological decontamination processes within the plant tissues.
95Zr was generally detected in fish from the ChNPP Cooling Pond between 1986 and 1989 [30]. In 1990, 95Zr was identified in a single fish sample, specifically in the internal organs of Scardinius erythrophthalmus (Linnaeus, 1758), at a concentration of 27 ± 11 Bq/kg fresh weight (Table 1).
95Zr was rarely found in piscivorous species from the ChNPP Cooling Pond, with the exception of a single sample of Leuciscus aspius (Linnaeus, 1758) showing 31 ± 12 Bq/kg fresh weight (carcass, May 1989). This radionuclide was more frequently detected in omnivorous and planktivorous fish (Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus, 1758), Carassius carassius (Linnaeus, 1758), Blicca bjoerkna (Linnaeus, 1758), Hypophthalmichthys molitrix (Valenciennes, 1844), Abramis brama (Linnaeus, 1758)), and less frequently in carnivorous fish (Silurus glanis (Linnaeus, 1758)). This distribution may be attributed to the type of feeding in fish: omnivores may ingest bottom sediments and detritus where ‘hot particles’ containing radioactive zirconium have settled, while planktivores may accumulate this radionuclide directly from suspended sediments and plankton, which contain higher concentrations. The absence of detectable 95Zr in piscivores suggests that the radionuclide is poorly available for absorption into the bloodstream and further distribution within the fish organism when consumed.
95Zr was consistently found in fish organs and tissues that come into direct contact with water, such as the head, scales, mucus, and fins (Figure 5 and Figure 6, Table 1). The lowest concentrations were recorded in muscle, bone, and fat tissues. 95Zr was not detected in the liver and kidneys of fish across various species.
Table 1. Content of 95Zr in fish tissues and organs (Bq/kg, fresh weight) from the Cooling Pond of the ChNPP, with sampling periods in the early years following the Chornobyl accident.
Table 1. Content of 95Zr in fish tissues and organs (Bq/kg, fresh weight) from the Cooling Pond of the ChNPP, with sampling periods in the early years following the Chornobyl accident.
Sample Collection PeriodTissue or Organ95Zr min95Zr max
November 1986–March 1988Head1177579
February 1987–August 1987Gills12429
October 1987–March 1989Muscles68128
November 1986–March 1990Internal Organs2759,177
November 1986–March 1988Intestines with Content373062
March 1987Roe22,225
August 1987–March 1988Fat16127
November 1987Swimming Bladder866
August 1987–October 1987Bones177247
November 1986–March 1988Fins972635
November 1986–August 1987Scales671240
November 1986–March 1987Whole Fish10915,424
In the first month following the Chornobyl accident, studies conducted in the Kaniv Reservoir indicated that 95Zr contributed significantly to the radioactive contamination of aquatic vegetation [4]. According to the report [31], 95Zr and 95Nb were the predominant radionuclides contaminating higher aquatic plants in the Reservoir during July–August 1986.
In the Kaniv Reservoir, 95Zr was detected in fish only during 1986 and 1987 (Table 2). Unlike the ChNPP Cooling Pond, 95Zr was more frequently found in piscivorous species (L. aspius, Sander lucioperca (Linnaeus, 1758)), as well as in carnivorous species (S. glanis, Perca fluviatilis (Linnaeus, 1758)) during 1986. This can be attributed to the increased bioavailability of the radionuclide at greater distances from the ChNPP. Therefore, in the Kaniv Reservoir, the trophic transfer and bioaccumulation of 95Zr likely became the primary factor influencing its distribution.
Table 2. Content of radionuclides (95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru) in fish tissues and organs (Bq/kg, fresh weight) from the Kaniv Reservoir, with sampling periods in the early years following the Chornobyl accident.
Table 2. Content of radionuclides (95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru) in fish tissues and organs (Bq/kg, fresh weight) from the Kaniv Reservoir, with sampling periods in the early years following the Chornobyl accident.
Sample Collection PeriodTissue or Organ95Zr min95Zr max
October 1986Head58
September 1986Skin29
September 1986Internal Organs19
17–27 September 1986Fins1531
May 1986–June 1987Whole Fish111112
95Nb min95Nb max
September 1986–October 1986Head10120
September 1986Skin22
October 1986Internal Organs54
September 1986–November 1987Roe742
September 1986Bones32
September 1986Scales15
September 1986–June 1987Whole Fish3129
103Ru min103Ru max
September 1986Head12
September 1986Skin19
September 1986–October 1986Roe712
September 1986Bones32
September 1986Fins25
May 1986Whole Fish630
106Ru min106Ru max
October 1986–July 1987Internal Organs59143
October 1986–August 1988Whole Fish60361
In the Kaniv Reservoir, a similar accumulation pattern of 95Zr in fish was observed, with the highest concentrations detected in organs and tissues in contact with water, and the lowest in muscles, bones, and roe (Figure 7).
Niobium (95Nb): Niobium was detected in omnivorous and planktivorous fish (C. carpio, C. carassius, B. bjoerkna, H. molitrix, Abramis brama (Linnaeus, 1758)), as well as in carnivorous fish (S. glanis and Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque, 1818)) from the ChNPP Cooling Pond, with a single exception of piscivore L. aspius (11 ± 5 Bq/kg, fresh weight, head, May 1989). In herbivorous fish (Scardinius erythrophthalmus (Linnaeus, 1758), 95Nb was detected only once in a “whole fish” sample at 224 ± 113 Bq/kg fresh weight. The bioaccumulation of niobium in fish was likely influenced by its initial introduction into the Cooling Pond primarily via ‘hot particle’ transport. Omnivores and carnivores likely obtained 95Nb from particles settled at the bottom of the Cooling Pond, while planktivores accumulated it from plankton and suspended matter.
The distribution of 95Nb in fish organs and tissues followed a similar pattern to that of 95Zr, but the specific activity levels of 95Nb were several times higher [32]. The highest specific activity of 95Nb was observed in the internal organs of H. molitrix, with a concentration of 204 ± 14 × 103 Bq/kg fresh weight in February 1987. Additionally, unlike 95Zr, niobium was detected in the kidneys and liver of H. molitrix at various sampling periods, with concentrations approaching 1 kBq/kg in the liver (Table 3). In the same species, the concentration of 95Nb in roe was the next highest. Significant levels of this radionuclide were also detected in muscles until spring 1989, nearly three years post-accident.
It is likely that 95Nb enters the fish organism solely through ingestion, is minimally processed in the digestive system, and is not significantly accumulated, except in a few instances. This is corroborated by the absence of its detection in piscivorous species. Furthermore, the presence of 95Nb in fish tissues that come into contact with water may indicate external contamination rather than percutaneous absorption.
Table 3. Content of 95Nb in fish tissues and organs (Bq/kg, fresh weight) from the Cooling Pond of the ChNPP, with sampling periods in the early years following the Chornobyl accident.
Table 3. Content of 95Nb in fish tissues and organs (Bq/kg, fresh weight) from the Cooling Pond of the ChNPP, with sampling periods in the early years following the Chornobyl accident.
Sample Collection PeriodTissue or Organ95Nb min95Nb max
November 1986–May 1989Head1125,287
February 1987–August 1987Gills311454
March 1987–August 1987Skin40475
October 1987–March 1989Muscles142537
November 1986–March 1988Internal Organs22203,687
November 1987Liver985
August 1987Kidneys175
April 1987–March 1989Intestines with Content527436
March 1987Roe57,535
February 1987–March 1988Fat21133
August 1987–October 1987Bones220911
November 1986–October 1987Fins417601
November 1986–August 1987Scales1172021
November 1986–May 1989Whole Fish7621,957
In contrast to the Cooling Pond, in the Kaniv Reservoir, 95Nb was more frequently detected in piscivores (L. aspius, S. lucioperca). In L. aspius, this radionuclide was recorded in multiple years in various body parts, including the head, scales, skin, bones, whole samples, and repeatedly in roe. 95Nb was not detected in carnivorous species. In omnivorous and planktivorous species from the Kaniv Reservoir, this radionuclide was primarily found in the head and whole fish samples, but not in muscle tissue (Table 2).
Ruthenium (103Ru): Elevated levels of 103Ru were recorded in higher aquatic vegetation in the Kaniv Reservoir (Figure 4), while significantly lower concentrations were detected in fish (Table 2). As in the Kaniv Reservoir, the highest specific activity of 103Ru in the ChNPP Cooling Pond was found in higher aquatic plants, predominantly represented by Potamogeton spp.
In general, fish accumulate most radionuclides through the food chain. In the Kaniv Reservoir, 103Ru was more frequently detected in piscivores. In the ChNPP Cooling Pond, however, 103Ru was found only in omnivores and planktivores, with the exception of a single carnivorous sample (S. glanis). This difference likely reflects the varying biological availability of 103Ru, influenced by the size of the ‘hot particles’ entering the ecosystem, particularly with increasing distance from the Chornobyl NPP [33].
The presence of 103Ru in the internal organs and whole fish samples of omnivores and planktivores from the Chornobyl Cooling Pond can likely be attributed to the ingestion of this radionuclide via food (Table 4).
Table 4. Content of 103Ru in fish tissues and organs (Bq/kg, fresh weight) from the Cooling Pond of the ChNPP, with sampling periods in the early years following the Chornobyl accident.
Table 4. Content of 103Ru in fish tissues and organs (Bq/kg, fresh weight) from the Cooling Pond of the ChNPP, with sampling periods in the early years following the Chornobyl accident.
Sample Collection PeriodTissue or Organ103Ru min103Ru max
November 1986–April 1987Head3301320
November 1986–April 1987Internal Organs1736687
March 1987Roe2294
April 1987Fins211
November 1986–December 1986Whole Fish3663487
The accumulation intensity of 103Ru in fish increases with distance from the Chornobyl NPP, likely due to the changes in the size of 103Ru-containing ‘hot particles’ [33].
Ruthenium (106Ru): In the Kaniv Reservoir, 106Ru was primarily detected in omnivorous fish (Figure 8).
The highest number of samples containing 106Ru were from whole fish, with this radionuclide detected until August 1988 (Table 2).
In contrast to the Kaniv Reservoir, 106Ru was found in fish belonging to different ecological groups in the ChNPP Cooling Pond, predominantly in omnivores, planktivores, and herbivores (Figure 9).
106Ru was also detected in carnivores (S. glanis and I. punctatus). Piscivores, including L. aspius and S. lucioperca, also exhibited detectable levels of 106Ru.
The highest specific activities of 106Ru were predominantly found in internal organs, suggesting that the radionuclide entered the fish organism via food (Table 5).
Table 5. Content of 106Ru in fish tissues and organs (Bq/kg, fresh weight) from the Cooling Pond of the ChNPP, with sampling periods in the early years following the Chornobyl accident.
Table 5. Content of 106Ru in fish tissues and organs (Bq/kg, fresh weight) from the Cooling Pond of the ChNPP, with sampling periods in the early years following the Chornobyl accident.
Sample Collection PeriodTissue or Organ106Ru min106Ru max
November 1986–March 1990Head13513,278
March 1987–April 1989Gills253700
October 1987–February 1990Skin190933
October 1987–March 1989Muscles535106,875
November 1986–March 1990Internal Organs922,769,433
August 1987Liver379
November 1987–March 1990Intestines with Content31622,906
March 1987–March 1990Roe10766,857
August 1987–March 1988Fat62758
October 1987–September 1988Swimming Bladder217643
November 1987–March 1990Bones1851019
April 1987–March 1990Fins7632,106
February 1987–March 1990Scales74513,088
November 1986–May 1989Whole Fish5021,139
The maximum 106Ru content (2,769,433 ± 234,254 Bq/kg fresh weight) was recorded in the internal organs of H. molitrix in October 1987. Lower levels were found in fat, liver, and other organs not in contact with water [34].
However, 106Ru was present in large quantities in the muscles of various ecological fish groups, including planktivores, piscivores, and carnivores in 1987–1989, i.e., not immediately after the accident.
The majority of the 106Ru-containing samples were fins and scales, suggesting that surface fixation of 106Ru particles on these tissues plays a significant role in fish contamination [34].

5. Post-Chornobyl Accumulation of 95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru in Fish

Since 1986, studies have been conducted in various countries of the Northern Hemisphere to assess the impact of the Chornobyl accident on aquatic ecosystems. Data on the post-Chornobyl accumulation of 95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru in air, soil, vegetation, and agricultural products remain limited [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. Moreover, the available literature provides few measurements of specific activity levels in fish.
Concentrations of 103Ru and 106Ru were measured in the water column and sediments of the North Basin of Windermere and Esthwaite Water (Cumbria, England) after the Chornobyl accident [45]. Observations indicated that Ru and Cs exhibited similar behavior in both lake systems with respect to their sedimentation rates.
Large particles collected at a depth of 200 m, 15 nautical miles off the coast of Calvi (Corsica), on 22 May 1986, contained Chornobyl-derived 95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru. Zooplankton sampled on 6 May contained 95Nb at 12 Bq/kg, 103Ru at 280 Bq/kg, and 106Ru at 70 Bq/kg (all based on dry weight); 95Zr was not detected [46]. The authors suggested that zooplankton, by ingesting radioactive fallout particles, produced fecal pellets that rapidly transported radionuclides to deeper waters within days, much faster than the expected years-long particle sedimentation model.
In the same region of the Mediterranean Sea, near Monaco, the accumulation of radionuclides from the Chornobyl release in the mollusk Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lamarck, 1819) was investigated [47]. Peak concentrations of 103Ru temporarily reached 480 Bq/kg (soft tissues, fresh weight). The soft tissues, including the gut, concentrated radionuclides approximately ten times more than the shells. In Patella lusitanica (Gmelin, 1791), the concentrations were 20–100 times higher than those observed in mussels.
The effects of the Chornobyl accident on aquatic biota were also examined in northern Scotland [48]. Significant levels of 137Cs, 134Cs, 106Ru, 103Ru, and 110mAg were detected in the marine environment. Both the brown alga Fucus vesiculosus (Linnaeus, 1753) and the clam Patella vulgata (Linnaeus, 1758) demonstrated rapid accumulation of Cs and Ru radionuclides, with peak values recorded within days of radioactive fallout reaching the UK.
Due to the Chornobyl accident, intensified monitoring was implemented around the Tokai Works of the Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation (PNC), located 120 km north of Tokyo, Japan [49]. Marine fish species such as Pleuronectes platessa (Linnaeus, 1758), as well as algae, clams, shrimp, squid, and seawater samples, were collected. 131I, 103Ru, and 106Ru were detected in algae; 103Ru, 106Ru, and 110mAg were found in cephalopods and clams.
Radionuclides, including 103Ru and 106Ru, were detected shortly after the Chornobyl accident in the Mediterranean seagrass Posidonia oceanica ((Linnaeus) Delile, 1813). Samples were collected along the northwestern French Mediterranean coastline, including Corsica. The species showed selective distribution of radionuclides among tissues, with adult leaves exhibiting the highest contamination [50].
The brown alga F. vesiculosus served as a bioindicator for assessing the spatial and temporal distribution of radionuclides in the Baltic Sea following the Chornobyl accident [51]. In samples collected along the eastern, southern, and southwestern coasts of Sweden in July 1986, 103Ru ranged from 12 ± 0.2 to 181 ± 14 Bq/kg, 106Ru from 0 to 136 ± 18 Bq/kg, and 95Zr from 0.0 to 60 ± 4 Bq/kg (all dry weight). By August–September 1987, 95Zr was no longer detected, and 106Ru activity had decreased to ≤22 ± 5 Bq/kg. No ruthenium isotopes were recorded in 1988.
Snoeijs and Notter [52] reported extremely high concentrations of fission products in diatom algae in and around the Biotest Basin (northern Baltic Sea, Sweden) within a week after the Chornobyl accident. On 6 May 1986, epilithic diatom communities contained 95Zr ranging from 14 to 864 kBq/kg, 95Nb from 18 to 1022 kBq/kg, and 103Ru from 16 to 540 kBq/kg (all dry weight). After April 1987, only 106Ru, 134Cs, and 137Cs were detectable. The radionuclides were likely bound to the organic envelope surrounding the diatom shells.
From 1990 to 2009, low concentrations of 106Ru were observed in the marine environment near the Channel Islands [6]. In Fucus seaweed, levels were <6 Bq/kg fresh weight; in mollusks (Osilinus lineatus (da Costa, 1778) and Patella vulgate (Linnaeus, 1758)), <10 Bq/kg; in sediment, <100 Bq/kg dry weight. The highest concentrations of 106Ru were recorded at the beginning of monitoring (1990), with a sharp decline by 1998. The presence of radionuclides in this region is not attributed to Chornobyl fallout but is believed to result from discharges from the La Hague nuclear fuel reprocessing plant in France. No detectable impact from radioactive waste disposal at the Hurd Deep site (1950–1963) was reported.
The bioavailability of 95Zr was examined in aquarium experiments using the edible shallow-water marine fish Bostrichthys sinensis (Lacepède, 1801) [53]. The highest accumulation was found in internal organs, gills, and fins. Concentrations in muscle, bone, liver, and roe were only slightly above detection limits. The authors noted that zirconium, being a non-essential element, is not readily transported to these tissues following ingestion or adsorption by visceral organs, gills, or fins.
An artificial aquatic ecosystem composed of water, sediment, aquatic plants (Eichhornia crassipes (Kunth, 1843)), snails (Bellamya purificata (Heude, 1890)), and fish (Carassius auratus (Linnaeus, 1758)) was established under laboratory conditions [54]. Results indicated that the specific activity of 95Nb in different fish tissues decreased in the following order: viscera > gills > fins > skin and scales > bones, head, roe > muscle. Specific activity in muscle, bones, liver, and roe remained low and only slightly above background levels. 95Nb persisted in the intestine, stomach, gills, and fins, with limited transport to internal organs. Maximum activity levels in skin and scales were 990 and 710 Bq/kg, respectively. The highest enrichment of 95Nb from water occurred in E. crassipes, followed by B. purificata, and then C. auratus.
Contaminated soil samples from the Kapikule Customs Grounds in Edirne (Turkey), affected by the Chornobyl accident, were used in aquarium experiments to investigate radionuclide accumulation in duckweed (Spirodela punctata (G. Mey.) C.H. Thomps) and a mixture including S. punctata, Lemna minor (Linnaeus, 1758), and Lemna gibba (Linnaeus, 1758). It was found that 106Ru leached into water more readily than cesium, although it was detected only in mixed duckweed samples, indicating a relatively low transfer coefficient compared to 134Cs and 137Cs [55].
The uptake of radionuclides by C. carpio from water sourced from the Rhône River (southeastern France) was examined in [56]. The experiment was conducted in a semi-natural 3 m3 pond located downstream of the Marcoule fuel reprocessing facility, continuously supplied with Rhône water. The highest concentration of 106Ru was detected in the digestive tract of fish. Muscle tissue showed the lowest concentrations and, despite its mass, accounted for only 1–5% of total radioactivity.
These observations strongly support the hypothesis that the transport mechanisms of such radionuclides in aquatic environments are not only influenced by their chemical properties, but also significantly shaped by ecological interactions and organism-specific metabolic processes, thus requiring further multidisciplinary studies to fully understand the long-term implications for both environmental and human health, particularly in post-accident scenarios where exposure routes may vary.

6. Summary

This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the scientific literature and original data concerning the input, distribution, and accumulation of 95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru in aquatic ecosystems. These isotopes exhibit varying bioavailability, different accumulation mechanisms in fish tissues, and show diverse abilities to participate in the trophic chain.
Table 6 provides a summarized analysis of the content of these radionuclides in fish based on literature sources and original data from the authors.
Particular attention should be drawn to the fact that all radionuclides were detected in significant concentrations in the fish roe from the Cooling Pond of the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant. Additionally, 95Nb and 103Ru were also found in fish roe from the Kaniv Reservoir. This situation poses a potential risk both to aquatic organisms and to humans. For fish, high concentrations of radionuclides in roe can have mutagenic or lethal effects, impacting embryonic development, reducing reproductive capacity, and disrupting natural population processes. On the other hand, human consumption of contaminated roe may lead to internal radiation exposure, which could cause serious health disorders over time. Thus, the presence of radionuclides in the reproductive tissues of fish signals potential threats to ecological safety and human health.
When comparing the accumulation of 95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru in fish from various ecological groups, omnivores and planktivores showed the highest accumulation levels of 95Zr and 95Nb. This may be due to these fish species consuming benthos and plankton that contained ‘hot particles’. In carnivores, nearly all isotopes were observed, with particular sensitivity to 95Nb and 106Ru. 95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru were also detected in piscivores, with high levels of 106Ru found in the muscle tissues of piscivores, suggesting possible trophic transfer of this radionuclide (Figure 10).
The ability of 106Ru to penetrate fish muscle tissue deserves special attention. In 1986, this radionuclide was not detected in the muscle tissues of fish from the Cooling Pond. The maximum concentration of 106Ru (106,875 Bq/kg fresh weight) was recorded in March 1989, nearly three years after the accident. This suggests that the redistribution of 106Ru in fish bodies occurs very slowly, with its arrival in muscle tissue taking more than a year after ecosystem contamination. 106Ru was found in the muscle tissues of fish from various ecological groups: planktivores (H. molitrix), piscivores (S. lucioperca, L. aspius), and carnivores (S. glanis). This indicates an extraordinarily high biological availability of 106Ru, regardless of the type of nutrition. It also confirms that this isotope has the ability to penetrate the “most protected” tissues of fish, which was previously considered unlikely.
Unfortunately, a comparison of the 106Ru accumulation data with another significant accident, the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear disaster, is not possible, as traditional fish surveys focused on two cesium isotopes (134Cs and 137Cs) [57], although 106Ru was recorded.
International recommendations classify two ruthenium isotopes (103Ru and 106Ru) under the group with a standard of 100 Bq/kg for “other radionuclides” [58,59,60]. According to these norms, a 106Ru concentration exceeding 100 Bq/kg is considered non-compliant. The levels of 106Ru in the Chornobyl Cooling Pond exceed international standards (≤100 Bq/kg) by hundreds to thousands of times, while in the Kaniv Reservoir, they exceed the standard several times. This provides sufficient grounds to assess the serious risk of direct consumption of such fish—the dose load significantly exceeds 1 mSv/year (for fish from the Chornobyl Cooling Pond).
When comparing the accumulation of 95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru (particle-reactive radionuclides) with the accumulation of biogenic short-lived radionuclides 54Mn, 60Co, and 65Zn in fish from the Chornobyl Cooling Pond [61], the primary mechanism of entry for all these radionuclides is dietary, with some contribution from percutaneous absorption. Muscle tissue generally exhibits low concentrations of all these radionuclides. The only one that accumulates in high concentrations in muscle tissue is 106Ru. This makes this radionuclide critical from a food safety perspective.
To reduce risks, it is necessary to strengthen ecological monitoring of water bodies, particularly in regions affected by radioactive contamination or in critical areas for potential accidents. Systematic fish checks for dangerous radionuclide content (including 106Ru) should be introduced, along with restrictions on fishing and consuming fish from critical zones. Public awareness of potential risks and support for scientific research in radioecology are equally important for making effective decisions at the state level.
The release of radionuclides into the environment, even in small quantities, poses a significant threat to both ecosystems and human health, as evidenced by numerous cases of radioactive contamination. Among these incidents, the release of the isotope 106Ru in 2017 is particularly concerning. Regrettably, the impact of this incident on aquatic ecosystems has yet to be comprehensively addressed in the scientific literature. From late September to early October 2017, air monitoring stations across Europe detected 106Ru [62]. Extraction experiments on air filters indicated a substantial presence of soluble 106Ru. In some regions of central and eastern Europe, daily average concentrations ranged from tens to over 100 mBq/m3. Analysis of diurnal variations in total beta activity suggested airborne 106Ru contamination, indicative of a radioactive plume passage [63]. Simultaneously, 103Ru was also detected at various European stations. Most atmospheric dispersion models trace the source to the Southern Urals (Russia) [62]. Specific studies [64] pinpoint two potential sources of 106Ru: (i) the Research Institute of Atomic Reactors, JSC “SSC Research Institute of Atomic Reactors” in Dimitrovgrad, Russia, and/or (ii) the Mayak Production Association (Ozersk, Russia). While trajectory calculations implicate the Southern Urals, official confirmation remains pending [62].
Historically, emissions of radionuclides have occurred repeatedly at the Mayak Production Association (MPA). Hamilton [1] documented that from 1949 to 1956, the operation of this facility resulted in the discharge of approximately 76 million m3 of liquid radioactive waste into the Techa River. This waste contained an estimated 100 × 1015 Bq of radioactivity, primarily consisting of ruthenium isotopes (103Ru, 106Ru) and rare earth elements. The Kyshtym disaster in 1957, caused by an explosion at a Mayak waste tank, released 74 × 1015 Bq of radioactivity into the atmosphere, primarily short-lived fission products such as 95Zr, 95Nb, and 144Ce, alongside smaller amounts of 137Cs. Additional emissions occurred through wind dispersal from Lake Karachay. Mayak’s production reactors operated until 1990, with spent nuclear fuel sent to Tomsk-7 for reprocessing. Radioactive waste injected into the ground at Tomsk-7 accounts for nearly 90% of the total waste released, approximately 37,000 × 1015 Bq. The most severe radiation accident at this facility occurred on 6 April 1993, when a waste storage tank exploded, releasing approximately 0.03 × 1015 Bq of radioactivity, predominantly short-lived beta- and gamma-emitting radionuclides, including 95Nb, 106Ru, and 95Zr.
Given this historical context, the recurrence of man-made incidents with cross-border consequences is plausible. Despite the absence of immediate threats to the population, the imperceptible and uncontrolled spread of artificial radionuclides over vast territories underscores the high risks associated with unauthorized or accidental releases that may remain undetected. Particularly alarming is the lack of transparency and reliable information from the source state, heightening the likelihood of future incidents. Amidst systematic opacity, the prospect of new radioactive leaks poses not only environmental but also global security concerns. With substantial volumes of radioactive materials and inadequate storage oversight, the potential for catastrophic environmental and public health consequences looms large.
This development reinforces the notion that even short-lived radionuclides, when released in significant and uncontrolled quantities, can have enduring environmental impacts and pose potential risks to public health. Therefore, continuous radiation monitoring, enhanced international cooperation in nuclear safety, and strengthened oversight of facilities involved in nuclear fuel production and processing are urgent imperatives that demand attention at both national and global levels.

7. Conclusions

Based on the analysis of the scientific literature and observational data, several general conclusions can be drawn regarding the entry, distribution, and accumulation of the short-lived radionuclides 95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru in aquatic ecosystems, with particular emphasis on their behavior in fish.
95Zr predominantly accumulates in external organs such as the skin, fins, gills, mucus, and scales. It is only occasionally detected in muscle and bone tissues, and in low concentrations. Its presence in fish is primarily associated with external contamination or the ingestion of contaminated particles through food and water.
95Nb exhibits a distribution pattern similar to that of 95Zr; however, its activity levels are notably higher in internal organs, especially in the liver, kidneys, roe, and gastrointestinal tract. This suggests a greater capacity for systemic accumulation within the organism. 95Nb is also found in muscle tissue, although at relatively low concentrations.
103Ru accumulates primarily in internal organs. In piscivorous fish from the Kaniv Reservoir, its presence is more pronounced, which may indicate increased bioavailability through trophic transfer at a distance from the contamination source.
106Ru is also concentrated mainly in internal organs, particularly within the digestive system, and less frequently in external tissues such as fins, skin, and scales. Unlike the other radionuclides studied, 106Ru is present in significant concentrations in muscle tissue. In general, this isotope has been detected in the internal organs of omnivorous, herbivorous, planktivorous, and carnivorous fish. However, its substantial accumulation in both muscle and reproductive tissues (roe) suggests it has exceptionally high bioavailability within the aquatic food web.
These summarized findings provide a foundation for further environmental monitoring, for forecasting the ecological consequences of radionuclide contamination in aquatic systems, and for assessing potential health risks to the human population in the event of fish consumption contaminated with these radionuclides.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.E.Z. and V.S.; methodology, N.E.Z. and L.P.P.; formal analysis, L.P.P.; data curation, N.E.Z. and V.S.; writing—original draft preparation, N.E.Z. and L.P.P.; writing—review and editing, N.E.Z. and V.S.; visualization, V.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Open Access Funding by the University for Continuing Education Krems.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hamilton, T.F. Chapter 2 Linking Legacies of the Cold War to Arrival of Anthropogenic Radionuclides in the Oceans Through the 20th Century. In Radioactivity in the Environment; Livingston, H.D., Ed.; Marine Radioactivity; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; Volume 6, pp. 23–78. [Google Scholar]
  2. NuDat 3. Available online: https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat3/ (accessed on 23 May 2025).
  3. International Atomic Energy Agency. Worldwide Marine Radioactivity Studies (WOMARS): Radionuclide Levels in Oceans and Seas; Tecdoc Series; International Atomic Energy Agency: Vienna, Austria, 2012; ISBN 92-0-114904-2. [Google Scholar]
  4. Romanenko, V.D. Fundamentals of Hydroecology; Geneza: Kyiv, Ukraine, 2004; ISBN 966-504-358-7. [Google Scholar]
  5. Harrison, F.L. Availability to Aquatic Animals of Short-Lived Radionuclides from a Plowshare Cratering Event. Health Phys. 1973, 24, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hughes, L.M.; Runacres, S.M.; Leonard, K.S. Marine Radioactivity in the Channel Islands, 1990–2009; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Salbu, B.; Bjørnstad, H.E.; Svaren, I.; Prosser, S.L.; Bulman, R.A.; Harvey, B.R.; Lovett, M.B. Size Distribution of Radionuclides in Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Liquids After Mixing with Seawater. Sci. Total Environ. 1993, 130–131, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mauchline, J.; Templeton, W.L. Dispersion in the Irish Sea of the Radioactive Liquid Effluent from Windscale Works of the U.K. Atomic Energy Authority. Nature 1963, 198, 623–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pentreath, R.J.; Jefferies, D.F. The Uptake of Radionuclides by I-Group Plaice (Pleuronectes Platessa) Off the Cumberland Coast, Irish Sea. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. United Kingd. 1971, 51, 963–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mitchell, N.T. Radioactivity in Surface and Coastal Waters of the British Isles, 1970; Fisheries Radiobiological Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food: Suffolk, UK, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  11. McDonald, P.; Baxter, M.S.; Fowler, S.W. Distribution of Radionuclides in Mussels, Winkles and Prawns. Part 1. Study of Organisms Under Environmental Conditions Using Conventional Radio-Analytical Techniques. J. Environ. Radioact. 1993, 18, 181–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Berg, G.G.; Ginsberg, E. Partition of Ruthenium-106 Between the Fresh Water Environment and Crayfish. Health Phys. 1976, 30, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Martin, J.M.; Thomas, A.J. Origins, Concentrations and Distributions of Artificial Radionuclides Discharged by the Rhône River to the Mediterranean Sea. J. Environ. Radioact. 1990, 11, 105–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hanmin, Z.; Shuqing, L.; Fushou, W.; Fuju, S.; Winglin, L.; Wenchum, Y. Radioactivity in the Coastal Waters of the Bohai and Yellow Seas of China. J. Environ. Radioact. 1991, 14, 193–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Coughtrey, P.J.; Jackson, D.; Thorne, M.C. Radionuclide Distribution and Transport in Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecosystems: A Critical Review of Data; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 1983; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
  16. Suzuki, Y.; Nakahara, M.; Ueda, T.; Suzuki, Y.; Nakahara, M.; Ueda, T. Accumulation and Excretion of 95Zr and 95Nb by Common Goby Acanthogobius Flavimanus. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 1979, 45, 1293–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Honda, Y.; Kimura, Y.; Tamura, Y.; Tanaka, C. Uptake of 106Ru by Eggs and Fry of Rainbow Trout. J. Radiat. Res. 1972, 13, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kimura, Y.; Honda, Y. Uptake and Elimination of Some Radionuclides by Eggs and Fry of Rainbow Trout (I). J. Radiat. Res. 1977, 18, 170–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Honda, Y.; Koga, T.; Morishima, H.; Sato, Y.; Kitawaki, S.; Nishiwaki, Y. Uptake and Loss of Radioactive Ruthenium by Freshwater Organisms. Radioisotopes 1971, 20, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zarubina, N.E.; Semak, V.; Burdo, O.S.; Ponomarenko, L.P. Ecological Half-Life of 137Cs in Fish. Ecologies 2023, 4, 463–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Strohal, P.; Lulić, S.; Jelisavčić, O. The Loss of Cerium, Cobalt, Manganese, Protactinium, Ruthenium and Zinc During Dry Ashing of Biological Material. Analyst 1969, 94, 678–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Iwashima, K. Analytical Methods for Ruthenium-106 in Marine Samples. J. Radiat. Res. 1972, 13, 127–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. International Atomic Energy Agency. Final Report of the IAEA INSAG Meeting on the Review of the Causes and Consequences of the Accident at Chernobyl; International Atomic Energy Agency: Vienna, Austria, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  24. Prister, B.S.; Loshchilov, N.A.; Nemets, O.F.; Poyarkov, V.A. Fundamentals of Agricultural Radiology; Urozhay: Kyiv, Ukraine, 1991; ISBN 5-337-00783-1. [Google Scholar]
  25. Loshchilov, I.A. Radiation Problems in the Agro-Industrial Complex After the Chernobyl Accident. In Problems of Agricultural Radiology: Collection of Scientific Works; PPP UkrNIINTI: Kyiv, Ukraine, 1991; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kashparov, V.A.; Ivanov, Y.A.; Prister, B.S. Formation of Hot Particles During the Chornobyl NPP Accident. In Problems of Agricultural Radiology: Collection of Scientific Works; PPP UkrNIINTI: Kyiv, Ukraine, 1996; pp. 45–56. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kashparov, V.A.; Ivanov, Y.A.; Khomutinin, Y.V.; Protsak, V.P. Estimation of Effective Temperature and Annealing Time of Fuel Particles Ejected from the Chornobyl Reactor During the Accident. In Problems of Agricultural Radiology: Collection of Scientific Works; PPP UkrNIINTI: Kyiv, Ukraine, 1996; pp. 56–66. [Google Scholar]
  28. Abagyan, A.A.; Asmanov, V.G.; Guskova, A.K. Information About the Accident at the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant and Its Consequences Prepared for the IAEA. At. Energy 1986, 61, 301–302. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kashparov, V.A. Radioactive Contamination of the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone by Fuel Particles and Their Radiological Significance. In Proceedings of the Problems of Safety at Nuclear Power Plants and Chornobyl, Chornobyl, Ukraine, 27 September–1 October 2004; Volume 3, pp. 61–69. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zarubin, O.L. The Content of 95Zr in the Components of the Ecosystem of the CHNPP. In Bulletin of the Ecological State of the Exclusion Zone and the Zone of Unconditional (Mandatory) Resettlement; INR NAN of Ukraine: Kiev, Ukraine, 2007; pp. 44–49. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kuzmenko, M.I.; Romanenko, V.D.; Derevets, V.V. Radionuclides in the Aquatic Ecosystems of Ukraine; Chornobyltekhinform: Kyiv, Ukraine, 2001; 318p, ISBN 966-7600-04-1. Available online: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=1378394296615549917&hl=en&oi=scholarr (accessed on 21 June 2025). (In Ukrainian)
  32. Zarubin, O.L.; Laktionov, V.A.; Moshna, B.O.; Babenko, V.V.; Litvinskaja, T.A.; Kostyuk, V.A.; Malyuk, I.A. Artificial Radionuclides in Freshwater Fish of Ukraine After the Chornobyl Accident. Nucl. Phys. At. Energy 2011, 12, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zarubin, O.L. The Content of 103Ru in Components of Fresh-Water and Adjoining to them Ground Ecosystems After Accident on ChNPP. Nucl. Phys. At. Energy 2007, 8, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zarubin, O.L. Content of 106Ru in Fish of the Kaniv Reservoir and Chornobyl NPP Cooling Pond After the 1986 Accident. In Proceedings of the Collection of Scientific Articles in 2 Volumes. Volume 1; “Saga” Publishing House: Shchelkino, Ukraine, 2008; pp. 43–48. [Google Scholar]
  35. Beresford, N.A.; Crout, N.M.J.; Mayes, R.W.; Howard, B.J.; Lamb, C.S. Dynamic Distribution of Radioisotopes of Cerium, Ruthenium and Silver in Sheep Tissues. J. Environ. Radioact. 1998, 38, 317–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Clooth, G.; Aumann, D.C. Environmental Transfer Parameters and Radiological Impact of the Chernobyl Fallout in and Around Bonn (Frg). J. Environ. Radioact. 1990, 12, 97–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Echevarria, G.; Morel, J.L.; Leclerc-Cessac, E. Retention and Phytoavailability of Radioniobium in Soils. J. Environ. Radioact. 2005, 78, 343–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Higuchi, H.; Fukatsu, H.; Hashimoto, T.; Nonaka, N.; Yoshimizu, K.; Omine, M.; Takano, N.; Abe, T. Radioactivity in Surface Air and Precipitation in Japan After the Chernobyl Accident. J. Environ. Radioact. 1988, 6, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Irlweck, K.; Khademi, B.; Henrich, E.; Kronraff, R. 239(240),238Pu, 90Sr, 103Ru and 137Cs Concentrations in Surface Air in Austria Due to Dispersion of Chernobyl Releases Over Europe. J. Environ. Radioact. 1993, 20, 133–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, L.-L.; Shi, J.-J.; Zhao, X.-Y.; Hua, Y.-J. Dynamics of Transfer and Distribution of 95Zr in the Broadbean-Soil Ecosystem. J. Environ. Radioact. 2005, 80, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Papastefanou, C.; Manolopoulou, M.; Sawidis, T. Lichens and Mosses: Biological Monitors of Radioactive Fallout from the Chernobyl Reactor Accident. J. Environ. Radioact. 1989, 9, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Smith, J.N.; Ellis, K.M. Time Dependent Transport of Chernobyl Radioactivity Between Atmospheric and Lichen Phases in Eastern Canada. J. Environ. Radioact. 1990, 11, 151–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ballestra, S.B.; Holm, E.; Walton, A.; Whitehead, N.E. Fallout Deposition at Monaco Following the Chernobyl Accident. J. Environ. Radioact. 1987, 5, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Martin, C.J.; Heaton, B.; Robb, J.D. Studies of 131I, 137Cs and 103Ru in Milk, Meat and Vegetables in North East Scotland Following the Chernobyl Accident. J. Environ. Radioact. 1988, 6, 247–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hilton, J.; Davison, W.; Hamilton-Taylor, J.; Kelly, M.; Livens, F.R.; Rigg, E.; Singleton, D.L. Similarities in the Behaviour of Chernobyl Derived Ru-103, Ru-106 and Cs-137 in Two Freshwater Lakes. Aquat. Sci. 1994, 56, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fowler, S.W.; Buat-Menard, P.; Yokoyama, Y.; Ballestra, S.; Holm, E.; Nguyen, H.V. Rapid Removal of Chernobyl Fallout from Mediterranean Surface Waters by Biological Activity. Nature 1987, 329, 56–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Whitehead, N.E.; Ballestra, S.; Holm, E.; Huynh-Ngoc, L. Chernobyl Radionuclides in Shellfish. J. Environ. Radioact. 1988, 7, 107–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Martin, C.J.; Heaton, B. The Impact of Chernobyl on the Marine Environment in Northern Scotland. J. Environ. Radioact. 1989, 9, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ishida, J.; Miyagawa, N.; Watanabe, H.; Asano, T.; Kitahara, Y. Environmental Radioactivity Around Tokai-Works After the Reactor Accident at Chernobyl. J. Environ. Radioact. 1988, 7, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Calmet, D.; Charmasson, S.; Gontier, G.; Meinesz, A.; Boudouresque, C.F. Chernobyl Radionuclides in the Mediterranean Seagrass Posidonia oceanica, 1986–1987. J. Environ. Radioact. 1991, 13, 157–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Carlson, L.; Holm, E. Radioactivity in Fucus vesiculosus L. from the Baltic Sea Following the Chernobyl Accident. J. Environ. Radioact. 1992, 15, 231–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Snoeijs, P.; Notter, M. Benthic Diatoms as Monitoring Organisms for Radionuclides in a Brackish-Water Coastal Environment. J. Environ. Radioact. 1993, 18, 23–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shi, J.; Guo, J.; Chen, H. Distribution and Migration of 95Zr in Marine Ecosystems. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2003, 149, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhao, X.; Huang, L.; Cai, Z.; Wang, S. Transference Kinetics of Radionuclide 95Nb in the Aquatic Ecosystem. World J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Polar, E.; Bayülgen, N. Differences in the Availabilities of Cesium-134, 137 and Ruthenium-106 from a Chernobyl-Contaminated Soil to a Water Plant, Duckweed, and to the Terrestrial Plants, Bean and Lettuce. J. Environ. Radioact. 1991, 13, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Garnier-Laplace, J.; Vray, F.; Baudin, J.P. A Dynamic Model for Radionuclide Transfer from Water to Freshwater Fish. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1997, 98, 141–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Report on the Levels and Effects of Radiation Exposure due to the Nuclear Accident after the 2011 Great East-Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. United Nations. 2013. Available online: https://www.unscear.org (accessed on 21 June 2025).
  58. Codex Alimentarius CXS 193-1995, General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed. CXS 193-1995. Codex STAN 193-1995. Available online: https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh-proxy/fr/?lnk=1&url=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FStandards%252FCXS%2B193-1995%252FCXS_193e.pdf (accessed on 21 June 2025).
  59. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards. GSR Part 32014. Available online: https://www.iaea.org/publications/8930 (accessed on 21 June 2025).
  60. European Commission. Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/52 of 15 January 2016 Laying down Maximum Permitted Levels of Radioactive Contamination of Food and Feed Following a Nuclear Accident or Any Other Case of Radiological Emergency. Official Journal of the European Union. 2016. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32016R0052 (accessed on 21 June 2025).
  61. Zarubina, N.E.; Semak, V.; Ponomarenko, L.P.; Burdo, O.S. Content of Short-lived Radionuclides (54Mn, 60Co, and 65Zn) in Fish. Fishes 2025, 10, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bossew, P.; Gering, F.; Petermann, E.; Hamburger, T.; Katzlberger, C.; Hernandez-Ceballos, M.A.; De Cort, M.; Gorzkiewicz, K.; Kierepko, R.; Mietelski, J.W. An Episode of Ru-106 in Air over Europe, September–October 2017—Geographical Distribution of Inhalation Dose over Europe. J. Environ. Radioact. 2019, 205–206, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jakab, D.; Endrődi, G.; Kocsonya, A.; Pántya, A.; Pázmándi, T.; Zagyvai, P. Methods, Results and Dose Consequences of 106Ru Detection in the Environment in Budapest, Hungary. J. Environ. Radioact. 2018, 192, 543–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sørensen, J.H. Method for Source Localization Proposed and Applied to the October 2017 Case of Atmospheric Dispersion of Ru-106. J. Environ. Radioact. 2018, 189, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Fish sampling sites. A Cooling Pond within the Chornobyl exclusion zone (yellow dotted circle) and the Kaniv Reservoir in the Kyiv south region, both located in Ukraine. Scale bars represent 10 km. The original image was sourced from the Google Earth (version 10.73.0.1) historical imagery photography databank (1986) and subsequently modified in BioRender. (Created in BioRender. Semak, V. (2025). https://BioRender.com/km8ueud).
Figure 1. Fish sampling sites. A Cooling Pond within the Chornobyl exclusion zone (yellow dotted circle) and the Kaniv Reservoir in the Kyiv south region, both located in Ukraine. Scale bars represent 10 km. The original image was sourced from the Google Earth (version 10.73.0.1) historical imagery photography databank (1986) and subsequently modified in BioRender. (Created in BioRender. Semak, V. (2025). https://BioRender.com/km8ueud).
Fishes 10 00330 g001
Figure 2. Fish sampling site upstream of the Kaniv Reservoir, Kyiv south region, Ukraine (50.0491642, 30.9685275), in 2010 (photo by N. Zarubina).
Figure 2. Fish sampling site upstream of the Kaniv Reservoir, Kyiv south region, Ukraine (50.0491642, 30.9685275), in 2010 (photo by N. Zarubina).
Fishes 10 00330 g002
Figure 3. Radionuclides in Cladophora spp. from the ChNPP Cooling Pond.
Figure 3. Radionuclides in Cladophora spp. from the ChNPP Cooling Pond.
Fishes 10 00330 g003
Figure 4. Radionuclides in Cladophora spp. from the Kaniv Reservoir.
Figure 4. Radionuclides in Cladophora spp. from the Kaniv Reservoir.
Fishes 10 00330 g004
Figure 5. Radionuclides in C. carpio from the Cooling Pond of the ChNPP, sampled on 22 November 1986.
Figure 5. Radionuclides in C. carpio from the Cooling Pond of the ChNPP, sampled on 22 November 1986.
Fishes 10 00330 g005
Figure 6. Radionuclides in C. carpio from the Cooling Pond of the ChNPP, sampled on 23 April 1987.
Figure 6. Radionuclides in C. carpio from the Cooling Pond of the ChNPP, sampled on 23 April 1987.
Fishes 10 00330 g006
Figure 7. Content of 95Zr in L. aspius from the Kaniv Reservoir, sampled in September 1986.
Figure 7. Content of 95Zr in L. aspius from the Kaniv Reservoir, sampled in September 1986.
Fishes 10 00330 g007
Figure 8. Radionuclides in B. bjoerkna from the Kaniv Reservoir (whole fish sample).
Figure 8. Radionuclides in B. bjoerkna from the Kaniv Reservoir (whole fish sample).
Fishes 10 00330 g008
Figure 9. Radionuclides in B. bjoerkna from the Cooling Pond of the ChNPP (whole fish sample).
Figure 9. Radionuclides in B. bjoerkna from the Cooling Pond of the ChNPP (whole fish sample).
Fishes 10 00330 g009
Figure 10. Pathways of radionuclide input and redistribution in the ecosystem of the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant Cooling Pond. (Created in BioRender. Semak, V. (2025). https://BioRender.com/votx22o).
Figure 10. Pathways of radionuclide input and redistribution in the ecosystem of the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant Cooling Pond. (Created in BioRender. Semak, V. (2025). https://BioRender.com/votx22o).
Fishes 10 00330 g010
Table 6. Comparative characteristics of the accumulation of 95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru in fish.
Table 6. Comparative characteristics of the accumulation of 95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru in fish.
RadionuclideEcological GroupOrgan/TissueMusclesFeatures of Accumulation
95ZrOmnivores
Planktivores
Less often in Carnivores
Gills
Scales
Fins
Skin
Roe
Negligible accumulationMore pronounced in external tissue.
95NbOmnivores
Planktivores
Less often in Carnivores
Internal Organs
Liver
Kidney
Roe
Very little or absentHigher in external tissues; penetrates internal organs.
103RuOmnivores
Planktivores
Later-stage Carnivores and Piscivores
Head
Roe
Internal Organs
Not detected in freshwater fish after 20 daysMinimal persistence in tissues.
106RuAll ecological groups.Internal Organs
Roe
Muscles
Gastrointestinal Tract
Scales
Fins
Very high; up to 106.88 Bq/kg fresh weightAccumulates in both external and internal organs.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zarubina, N.E.; Semak, V.; Ponomarenko, L.P. Content of Short-Lived Radionuclides (95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru) in Fish. Fishes 2025, 10, 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10070330

AMA Style

Zarubina NE, Semak V, Ponomarenko LP. Content of Short-Lived Radionuclides (95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru) in Fish. Fishes. 2025; 10(7):330. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10070330

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zarubina, Nataliia E., Vladislav Semak, and Liliia P. Ponomarenko. 2025. "Content of Short-Lived Radionuclides (95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru) in Fish" Fishes 10, no. 7: 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10070330

APA Style

Zarubina, N. E., Semak, V., & Ponomarenko, L. P. (2025). Content of Short-Lived Radionuclides (95Zr, 95Nb, 103Ru, and 106Ru) in Fish. Fishes, 10(7), 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10070330

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop