Next Article in Journal
Design and Performance Evaluation of a Feed Distribution Device in the Small-Scale Pneumatic Conveying Feeder for Recirculating Aquaculture Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment Method for Feeding Intensity of Fish Schools Using MobileViT-CoordAtt
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Expanding Host Range: First Record of Eustrongylides excisus in Padogobius bonelli (Gobiidae) from the Po River (Northwest Italy)

1
The Veterinary Medical Research Institute for Piemonte, Liguria and Valle d’Aosta, Via Bologna 148, 10154 Turin, Italy
2
Department of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology, University of Perugia, Via Elce di Sotto 8, 06123 Perugia, Italy
3
ISEM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, 34090 Montpellier, France
4
Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Via L. Giorgieri 10, 34127 Trieste, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fishes 2025, 10(6), 254; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10060254
Submission received: 5 May 2025 / Revised: 23 May 2025 / Accepted: 24 May 2025 / Published: 29 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Fish Pathology and Parasitology)

Abstract

Fish-borne parasites encompass diverse taxonomic groups, including nematodes of the genus Eustrongylides (family Dioctophymatidae), which infect fish, fish-eating birds, and, occasionally, humans. Eustrongylides spp. are globally distributed, with E. ignotus and E. tubifex prevalent in North America, while E. excisus is more frequent in Europe and the Middle East. This study investigates the presence of E. excisus in a fish community of the Po River (Turin, northwest Italy). Among 170 fish sampled from three sites along the Po River, only two Padogobius bonelli individuals from the Murazzi site were found to be infected, each hosting a single larva within the abdominal cavity. Molecular analysis (ITS rDNA sequencing) confirmed the parasite as E. excisus, showing 100% identity with known sequences. Although prevalence in this study was low (1.18%), the findings significantly expand the known host range of E. excisus, previously reported only in other gobiid species in Eastern Europe. The parasite is widely distributed in Italy, especially in commercial fish from large lakes, and its spread is facilitated by oligochaete intermediate hosts and piscivorous birds like cormorants. Given the benthic habits and diet of P. bonelli, increased monitoring is needed to better understand the parasite’s transmission dynamics and the potential risks to native biodiversity and human health.
Key Contribution: This study reports the first detection of Eustrongylides excisus in Padogobius bonelli from the Po River, expanding the known host range of this zoonotic parasite. Molecular confirmation and ecological context highlight the need for enhanced monitoring to assess transmission dynamics and potential risks to biodiversity and public health.

1. Introduction

Fish-borne parasites include a variety of organisms from different taxonomic groups, such as nematodes (family Anisakidae), trematodes (families Opisthorchiidae and Heterophyidae), and cestodes (family Dibothriocephalidae) [1]. The genus Eustrongylides Jägerskiöld, 1909 (family Dioctophymatidae) consists of nematodes that parasitize numerous fish species and fish-eating birds in freshwater ecosystems [2]. These nematodes have a heteroxenous life cycle with five developmental stages, requiring two intermediate hosts and one definitive host. Most infections are associated with freshwater environments [3]. In their adult stage, Eustrongylides nematodes inhabit the mucosal tissues of the esophagus, proventriculus, and/or intestines of piscivorous birds, particularly those of the orders Ciconiformes and Phalacrocoracidae. The eggs are excreted in the feces of these definitive hosts and develop into second and third larval stages when consumed by aquatic oligochaetes (e.g., Tubifex spp., Lumbricus spp. and Limnodrilus spp.). Eutrophication of aquatic environments, by increasing nutrient levels, favors the proliferation of oligochaete populations and can significantly increase the prevalence of Eustrongylides infections [4].
Several fish species serve as secondary intermediate hosts for Eustrongylides spp. [2,3,4,5]. Predatory fish, such as perch and largemouth bass, are at greater risk of severe infection due to the consumption of infected prey, which amplifies parasite loads [5]. Furthermore, large predatory fish, amphibians (family Bufonidae), and reptiles (e.g., Natrix tessellata) can act as paratenic hosts, facilitating transmission of the parasite to definitive hosts [6,7], as shown in Figure 1.
Eustrongylides parasites are known to infect birds, fish, and humans [8,9,10]. In avian hosts, the parasites localize primarily in the proventriculus, ventriculus, and intestines, where they create tunnels, eliciting an inflammatory response [11]. In fish, infections are associated with severe pathological effects and pronounced inflammation, with larvae commonly found within the musculature, internal organs, or body cavity [8,12,13]. Parasitized fish generally do not exhibit high mortality rates but may experience chronic inflammation, a reduction in erythrocyte counts (or anemia in more severe cases), and an increase in neutrophils. These changes lead to greater vulnerability to infections by opportunistic pathogens [7,14,15].
Eustrongylidiasis is a zoonotic parasitic disease in humans transmitted through the ingestion of raw or undercooked fish infected with the larval stages of the parasite [16]. The number of officially registered cases was eight, all originating from North America and Sudan [14]; however, unregistered cases may also exist. The clinical manifestations of the disease predominantly include gastrointestinal symptoms, such as gastritis or enteritis [17,18,19], with progression to intestinal perforation reported in severe cases [9]. The symptoms were diagnosed as appendicitis, but it was only during the surgical procedure that the presence of parasites in the abdominal cavity was discovered [16,19]. A rare cutaneous presentation was documented in two cases from South Sudan. Even in this case, the definitive treatment is surgical excision of the larvae [20]. Due to its prevalence in fish and its potential danger to humans if ingested, scientific interest about the prevalence and geographic distribution of this parasite has increased over the last years, particularly concerning fish intended for human consumption [2].
Nematodes belonging to the genus Eustrongylides are now globally distributed, with reports documented on all continents [21]. The prevalence of dominant species varies geographically; E. ignotus and E. tubifex are predominantly identified in North America, while E. excisus is more frequently reported in Europe and the Middle East [22]. A bibliographic review indicates that E. excisus was not recorded in European regions prior to 2009 [23], with subsequent reports emerging only in 2015 [8]. From that point forward, interest in this parasite has increased, leading to a surge in related studies, as shown in Figure 2. An analysis of the scientific literature indexed in the Scopus database (https://www.scopus.com/home.uri?zone=header&origin=sbrowse; accessed on 23 May 2025) using the keyword “Eustrongylides” reveals a clear and consistent increase in research attention from 1980 to 2024. While the number of publications remained relatively low and stable through the 1980s and 1990s, a notable rise began in the early 2000s, with a sharp acceleration observed after 2015 (Figure 2A). The peak in publication output occurred in 2023, with over 60 documents, indicating heightened global interest in the parasite, likely driven by its ecological and zoonotic relevance. Geographically, the United States has contributed the highest number of publications, followed by Brazil and Canada, with significant input also coming from Germany, Italy, India, and other countries (Figure 2B). This trend underscores the growing recognition of Eustrongylides as a topic of international concern, particularly in relation to aquatic health and food safety.
Recent research has documented an expanding distribution of Eustrongylides nematodes in Italy, potentially driven by the rising population of cormorants around lakes and various biotic and abiotic factors [5,24]. However, existing knowledge has predominantly been derived from studies in commercially significant fishing areas, particularly lakes, such as Lake Trasimeno and Lake Garda [5,25,26]. Unfortunately, limited information is available regarding the presence and the prevalence of this parasite in natural fish populations and its broader ecological implications, a knowledge gap particularly evident in lotic ecosystems. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the occurrence of Eustrongylides nematodes in the Po River (northwestern Italy). To achieve this, comprehensive fish community monitoring was conducted at three sampling sites along the metropolitan stretch of the river.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The Po River originates from Mount Monviso (2020 m a.s.l.) in the Piedmont region (NW Italy) and extends approximately 650 km, fed by 141 tributaries. The Po River basin encompasses regions characterized by diverse hydrological and geomorphological features, as evidenced by the highly variable drainage system of the river and its tributaries. The ichthyofauna consists of 35 freshwater species and 10 euryhaline species, amounting to at least 45 native fish species, including 16 Italian endemics or sub-endemics [27].
For this study, three sampling sites along the urban stretch of the Po River in the Turin metropolitan area were chosen (Figure 3): one in Moncalieri (260 m a.s.l.) near the confluence with Sangone Creek, another in central Turin called Murazzi (239 m a.s.l.), and a third downstream of the San Mauro dam (210 m a.s.l.). All sites are subject to significant anthropogenic pressure, with wastewater from homes, hospitals, and industry particularly affecting the area between Moncalieri and the Murazzi station [27].

2.2. Fish Sampling

A single fish sampling session was conducted on 20 August 2024, employing electrofishing in accordance with the guidelines detailed in the “Protocol for Sampling and Analysis of the Fish Fauna in Lotic Ecosystems” [28]. For this study, a standardized quali-quantitative fish sampling protocol was employed, consistent with national guidelines for lotic systems and aligned with CEN EN 14011:2003 standards [28]. Each sampling station was delineated using a 50 m transect as the unit of monitoring, positioned to represent the range of mesohabitats present (e.g., pools, riffles, runs). This length was selected to ensure comparability across sites while capturing a representative sample of the local fish assemblage. Fishing was conducted in an upstream direction to avoid disturbing fish ahead of the sampling area. Electrofishing was conducted using a battery-powered backpack electrofisher (Model IG200-2, Hans-Grassl GmbH, Schönau am Königssee, Germany) with the following operating parameters: pulsed direct current with a voltage range of 150–200 V and a current intensity between 15 and 25 A, adjusted in the field according to water conductivity and site-specific conditions to ensure effective fish capture and minimize stress. Electrofishing operations were conducted with the authorization and participation of the specialized Wildlife and Flora Protection function of the Metropolitan City of Turin, Italy (resolution of the provincial council No. 844-22328 of 5 June 2009, and No. 922-49228 of 9 December 2013). The fish were then euthanized using an overdose (150 mg/L) of tricaine methanesulfonate (MS-222) and subsequently transported to the laboratory.

2.3. Fish Identification and Parasite Investigation

Specimens were identified using the Italian freshwater fish checklist [29], and measurements of their body weight and total length were recorded. Muscles and organs were inspected for zoonotic parasites. Skeletal muscles were sectioned into slices measuring 2–3 mm and examined under a transilluminator (UVP White Light Transilluminators, TW-43, Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany) to detect encysted parasites.
Nematodes were isolated using pointed light metal forceps and a fine needle, rinsed in deionized water, and fixed in 70% ethanol. After fixation, the head and tail of each larva were removed for morphological examination under light microscopy at up to 40× magnification, while the central body segment, which lacks taxonomically relevant features, was used for molecular analysis [30,31]. Specimens preserved in ethanol were classified to the genus level based on morphological keys provided by Moravec [12].

2.4. Molecular Analysis

Molecular analyses were performed following the method described by Mazzone et al. [31]. Species identification was achieved by sequencing the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), a conserved genomic region [32,33]. Both DNA strands were sequenced, and the resulting sequences were compared to similar entries in the GenBank database using BLASTn (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 23 May 2025). A minimum sequence identity of 98% was applied as the threshold for species assignment.

3. Results

A total of 170 fish were collected across the three sampling sites, with 42 individuals obtained from Moncalieri, 57 from Murazzi, and 71 from San Mauro. Table 1 provides an overview of the identified species, along with their mean total lengths and weights. At the Moncalieri site, the fish community was predominantly composed of Barbus barbus (61.90%), followed by Padogobius bonelli (19.05%). The Murazzi site exhibited greater diversity, with Leuciscus sp. (38.60%), Barbus barbus (15.79%), Rhodeus amarus (14.04%), Cobitis bilineata (10.53%), and Padogobius bonelli (10.53%). Furthermore, at Moncalieri, Barbus barbus (39.44%) remained dominant, followed by Squalius squalus (29.58%) and Cobitis bilineata (11.27%). The San Mauro site exhibited a lower proportion of non-native species (49.30%) compared to Moncalieri (73.81%) and Murazzi (77.19%).
Of the 170 fish sampled, only two specimens of Padogobius bonelli (1.18%) from the Murazzi site were found to harbor a single nematode larva each in their abdominal cavity, as shown in Figure 4. The parasites measured 43 mm and 39 mm in length, respectively.
As illustrated in Figure 5, the parasite’s body is widest at the center and becomes thinner toward both ends. The anterior end is not swollen, the cuticle lacks spines, and the transverse shape becomes more distinct near the extremities [14].
Amplification of the ITS rDNA sequences of the nematodes morphologically ascribable to the genus Eustrongylides spp. showed they were identical to each other. BLAST analysis gave 100% identity with the sequence of E. excisus deposited by Mazzone et al. [31].

4. Discussion

The fish community found at the three sites analyzed is similar to that found in previous work carried out in the same area [27]. The presence of Eustrongylides excisus was detected in only two individuals of Padogbius bonelli from Murazzi site, which is located in the centre of Turin.
Padogobius bonelli (Bonaparte, 1846), a species within the family Gobiidae, is an endemic fish native to the northern Adriatic region. Its distribution spans northern Italy, including the Po and Adige River basins, as well as parts of Dalmatia [34].
The presence of this parasite within the Gobiidae family has never been documented in P. bonelli and only in the species Babka gymnotrachelus and Neogobius fluviatilis in the Bulgarian section of the Danube [35]. In that study, the prevalence ranged from 9.09% to 25.81% in N. fluviatilis and from 25% to 40% in B. gymnotrachelus. Similarly, in the Po River, the prevalence of E. excisus in P. Bonelli ranged from 0 to 33.3%. However, E. excisus is commonly found in edible and commercially important fish species in Italy, including European perch (Perca fluviatilis), largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), and sand smelt (Atherina boyeri) [5,8,24,25,30,36,37,38]. Among these, the highest prevalence was recorded in perch from Lake Trasimeno (67.99%) [36] and in largemouth bass from Lake Garda (30%) [5]. Additionally, a notable prevalence has been reported in the non-native species Lepomis gibbosus in Lake San Michele (18.3%), Lake Candia (92.04%), and Lake Viverone (40.83%), all located in Piedmont (northwest Italy) [30,38]. The parasite’s range also appears to be expanding. In fact, while no presence was detected in the Lakes of Avigliana (northwest Italy) during studies conducted between 2019 and 2022 [38], in 2023, it was reported in L. gibbosus and Ameiurus melas [39].
The most recent reports from Italy, with a particular focus on the Piedmont region, are presented in Table 2.
Several environmental factors may contribute to the expansion of both the range and the host diversity of E. excisus. Once released into the environment, the eggs of E. excisus can hatch at any time of the year and retain infective capacity for up to two years. Furthermore, the larvae have been observed to survive within the intermediate host for a period exceeding one year [13]. Piscivorous birds serve as definitive hosts for various parasite species, playing a key role in their distribution [30,41]. In particular, cormorants, once rare as wintering birds until 1980, have significantly increased in number in the Piedmont region, now inhabiting both large and small water bodies [24,42]. Additionally, climate change is known to influence bird distribution [43,44] and may alter parasite dynamics by shifting spatial ranges, host–parasite relationships, life cycle timing, and ecosystem interactions [45]. A recent review by Menconi et al. [2] also reported Eustrongylides nematodes in new fish hosts, including Anguilla anguilla (eel), Ameiurus melas (black bullhead catfish), Tinca tinca (tench), Cyprinus carpio (carp), Silurus glanis (wels catfish), and Chelon ramada (small thin-lip gray mullet).
The Po River basin is one of the most agriculturally productive and densely populated areas in Europe, but it is also among the most affected by nutrient pollution [46]. In such environments, low-oxygen conditions favor the proliferation of oligochaetes, which thrive by feeding on organic material [47]. Their abundance in eutrophic waters may create favorable conditions for the life cycle of E. excisus, as these worms play a crucial role in the parasite’s transmission to fish hosts [5]. Padogobius bonelli is primarily a benthic predator, feeding on stream-dwelling invertebrates and fish eggs [48]. Given its feeding habits, it is reasonable to hypothesize that its diet may also include aquatic oligochaetes, which serve as the first intermediate hosts in the life cycle of E. excisus. Despite the absence of additional evidence in our study, previous research has documented that other fish can consume infected prey and acquire multiple parasite infections [4,30]. Therefore, extending monitoring to larger fish is essential to accurately assess the prevalence of the parasite in predatory species.
In Italy, most reports of E. excisus originate from large lakes (e.g., Lake Trasimeno and Lake Garda) with intensive fishing activity and a commercial market for fish products intended for human consumption [5,25,36]. In contrast, the parasitological study of river fish not intended for consumption remains of limited scientific and economic interest.

5. Conclusions

This study reports for the first time the presence of Eustrongylides excisus in Padogobius bonelli, highlighting its expanding geographical range and host diversity. Parasites play a crucial yet often overlooked role in ecosystem and biodiversity research [49]. To improve our understanding of the parasite’s various hosts, continued monitoring of Po River fish fauna and, potentially, its macroinvertebrates communities, particularly oligochaetes, is essential. Furthermore, helminthological studies on predatory fish that consume gobies and are part of the human diet are recommended to assess potential health risks.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M., A.G., R.E.G., M.C., G.E., M.B., E.P., P.P. and M.P.; data curation, A.M.; investigation, A.M., C.M., G.E., F.B., P.P. and M.P.; methodology, A.M., C.M., A.G., F.B., E.P., P.P. and M.P.; project administration, M.P.; supervision, P.P. and M.P.; writing—original draft, A.M. and P.P.; writing—review and editing, C.M., A.G., R.E.G., M.C., G.E., M.B., E.P., P.P. and M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Fondazione CRT, grant number 23D04.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The sampling was carried out as part of a monitoring campaign led by the Fish Diseases Laboratory of the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d’Aosta (IZSPLV, Turin, Italy), aimed at assessing the health status of wild fish populations. This activity was conducted within the framework of a research project funded by the Fondazione CRT (grant number 23D04). Electrofishing operations were authorized and performed in collaboration with the specialized Wildlife and Flora Protection Unit of the Metropolitan City of Turin, in accordance with the resolutions of the Provincial Council No. 844-22328 (5 June 2009) and No. 922-49228 (9 December 2013).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Paolo Lo Conte (Città Metropolitana di Torino) for the fish sampling and for his technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bouwknegt, M.; Devleesschauwer, B.; Graham, H.; Robertson, L.J.; van der Giessen, J.W.; The Euro-FBP Workshop Participants. Prioritisation of Food-Borne Parasites in Europe, 2016. Euro. Surveill. 2018, 23, 17–00161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Menconi, V.; Lazzaro, E.; Bertola, M.; Guardone, L.; Mazzucato, M.; Prearo, M.; Bilska-Zajac, E.; Cortinovis, L.; Manfrin, A.; Arcangeli, G.; et al. The Occurrence of Freshwater Fish-Borne Zoonotic Helminths in Italy and Neighbouring Countries: A Systematic Review. Animals 2023, 13, 3793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Spalding, M.G.; Forrester, D.J. Pathogenesis of Eustrongylides ignotus (Nematoda: Dioctophymatoidea) in Ciconiiformes. J. Wildl. Dis. 1993, 29, 250–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Coyner, D.F.; Spalding, M.G.; Forrester, D.J. Epizootiology of Eustrongylides ignotus in Florida: Distribution, Density, and Natural Infections in Intermediate Hosts. J. Wildl. Dis. 2002, 38, 483–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Menconi, V.; Tedesco, P.; Pastorino, P.; Confortini, I.; Esposito, G.; Tomasoni, M.; Mugetti, D.; Gustinelli, A.; Dondo, A.; Pizzul, E.; et al. Could Fish Feeding Behaviour and Size Explain Prevalence Differences of the Nematode Eustrongylides excisus among Species? The Case Study of Lake Garda. Water 2021, 13, 3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Melo, F.T.D.V.; Melo, C.D.S.B.; Nascimento, L.d.C.S.D.; Giese, E.G.; Furtado, A.P.; dos Santos, J.N. Morphological Characterization of Eustrongylides Sp. Larvae (Nematoda, Dioctophymatoidea) Parasite of Rhinella marina (Amphibia: Bufonidae) from Eastern Amazonia. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2016, 25, 235–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Goncharov, S.L.; Soroka, N.M.; Pashkevich, I.Y.; Dubovyi, A.I.; Bondar, A.O. Infection of Predatory Fish with Larvae of Eustrongylides excisus (Nematoda, Dioctophymatidae) in the Delta of the Dnipro River and the Dnipro-Buh Estuary in Southern Ukraine. Vestn. Zool. 2018, 52, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dezfuli, B.S.; Manera, M.; Lorenzoni, M.; Pironi, F.; Shinn, A.P.; Giari, L. Histopathology and the inflammatory response of European perch, Perca fluviatilis muscle infected with Eustrongylides sp. (Nematoda). Parasit. Vectors 2015, 8, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Eberhard, M.L.; Hurwitz, H.; Sun, A.M.; Coletta, D. Intestinal perforation caused by larval Eustrongylides (Nematoda: Dioctophymatoidae) in New Jersey. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1989, 40, 648–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Caudill, G.; Wolf, D.; Caudill, D.; Brown, J.; Shearn-Bochsler, V.A. Juvenile wading-bird mortality event in urban Jacksonville, Florida, associated with the parasite Eustrongylides. Florida Field Nat. 2014, 42, 108–113. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cole, R.A. Eustrongylidosis. In Field Manual of Wildlife Diseases: General Field Procedures and Diseases of Birds; Friend, M., Franson, J.C., Eds.; USA Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1999; pp. 223–228. [Google Scholar]
  12. Moravec, F. Nematodes parasitic in fishes as larvae. In Parasitic Nematodes of Freshwater Fishes of Europe; Moravec, F., Ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1994; pp. 374–421. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bjelić-Čabrilo, O.; Novakov, N.; Ćirković, M.; Kostić, D.; Popović, E.; Aleksić, N.; Lujić, J. The first determination of Eustrongylides excisus Jägerskiöld, 1909—Larvae (Nematoda: Dioctophymatidae) in the pike-perch Sander lucioperca in Vojvodina (Serbia). Helminthologia 2013, 50, 291–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Honcharov, S.L.; Soroka, N.M.; Galat, M.V.; Zhurenko, O.V.; Dubovyi, A.I.; Dzhmil, V.I. Eustrongylides (Nematoda: Dioctophymatidae): Epizootology and special characteristics of the development biology. Helminthologia 2022, 59, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Okon, E.M.; Okocha, R.C.; Taiwo, A.B.; Michael, F.B.; Bolanle, A.M. Dynamics of co-infection in fish: A review of pathogen-host interaction and clinical outcome. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. Rep. 2023, 4, 100096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wittner, M.; Turner, J.W.; Jacquette, G.; Ash, L.R.; Salgo, M.P.; Tanowitz, H.B. Eustrongylidiasis: A parasitic infection acquired by eating sushi. N. Engl. J. Med. 1989, 320, 1124–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guerin, P.F.; Marapendi, S.; MC Grail, L. Intestinal perforation caused by larval Eustrongylides. Morb. Mort. Week Rep. 1982, 31, 383–389. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gunby, P. One worm in the minnow equals too many in the gut. JAMA 1982, 248, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Narr, L.L.; O’Donnell, J.G.; Libster, B.; Alessi, P.; Abraham, D. Eustrongylidiasis a parasitic infection acquired by eating live minnow. J. Am. Osteopath. Assoc. 1996, 96, 400–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Eberhard, M.L.; Ruiz-Tiben, E. Cutaneous emergence of Eustrongylides in two persons from South Sudan. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2014, 90, 315–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shamsi, S.; Francis, N.; Masiga, J.; Barton, D.P.; Zhu, X.; Pearce, L.; McLellan, M. Occurrence and Characterisation of Eustrongylides Species in Australian Native Birds and Fish. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2023, 30, e00189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Honcharov, S.L.; Soroka, N.M.; Halat, M.V.; Dubovyi, A.I.; Zhurenko, V.V.; Halushko, I.A. Distribution of the Nematodes of the Genus Eustrongylides (Nematoda, Dioctophymatidae) in the World. Regul. Mech. Biosyst. 2022, 13, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jakob, E.; Hanel, R.; Klimpel, S.; Zumholz, K. Salinity Dependence of Parasite Infestation in the European Eel Anguilla anguilla in Northern Germany. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2009, 66, 358–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gagliardi, A.; Preatoni, D.G.; Wauters, L.A.; Martinoli, A. Selective Predators or Choosy Fishermen? Relation between Fish Harvest, Prey Availability and Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis) Diet. Ital. J. Zool. 2015, 82, 544–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Branciari, R.; Ranucci, D.; Miraglia, D.; Valiani, A.; Veronesi, F.; Urbani, E.; Lo Vaglio, G.; Pascucci, L.; Franceschini, R. Occurrence of parasites of the genus Eustrongylides spp.(Nematoda: Dioctophymatidae) in fish caught in Trasimeno lake, Italy. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2016, 5, 6130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Franceschini, R.; Valiani, A.; Ranucci, D.; Roila, R.; Palma, G.; Agnetti, F.; Di Giacinto, G.; Branciari, R. Eustrongylides spp. parasite risk management in Atherina boyeri from Lake Trasimeno. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2023, 12, 11338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pastorino, P.; Squadrone, S.; Berti, G.; Esposito, G.; Bondavalli, F.; Renzi, M.; Pizzul, E.; Kazmi, S.S.U.H.; Barceló, D.; Abete, M.C.; et al. Occurrence of rare earth elements in water, sediment, and freshwater fish of diverse trophic levels and feeding ecology: Insights from the Po river (northwest Italy). Environ. Res. 2024, 240, 117455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sollazzo, C.; Scanu, G.; Aste, F.; Pineschi, G.; Belli, M.; Balzamo, S.; Martone, C.; Cadoni, F.; Bernabei, S.; D’Antoni, S.; et al. Protocollo di campionamento e analisi della fauna ittica nei sistemi lotici guadabili. In Metodi Biologici per le Acque Superficiali Interne, 111/2014; Manuali e Linee Guida; ISPRA: Rome, Italy, 2014; pp. 1–15. Available online: https://www.isprambiente.gov.it/files/pubblicazioni/manuali–lineeguida/MLG__111_2014_Metodi_Biologici_acque.pdf (accessed on 23 May 2025).
  29. AIIAD. Check List Ittiofauna Italiana_GdL3.0_05032021.xlsx. Check List v.3.0.0 del 5 March 2021. Available online: http://www.aiiad.it (accessed on 23 May 2025).
  30. Menconi, V.; Riina, M.V.; Pastorino, P.; Mugetti, D.; Canola, S.; Pizzul, E.; Bona, M.C.; Dondo, A.; Acutis, P.L.; Prearo, M. First occurrence of Eustrongylides spp. (Nematoda: Dioctophymatidae) in a subalpine lake in Northwest Italy: New data on distribution and host range. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mazzone, A.; Caffara, M.; Gustinelli, A.; Agnetti, F.; Sgariglia, E.; Lo Vaglio, G.; Fioravanti, M.L. Morphological and molecular characterization of larval and adult stages of Eustrongylides excisus (Nematoda: Dioctophymatoidea) with histopathological observations. J. Parasitol. 2019, 105, 882–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cribb, T.H.; Anderson, G.R.; Adlard, R.D.; Bray, R.A. A DNA-based demonstration of a three-host lifecycle for the Bivesiculidae (Platyhelminthes: Digenea). Int. J. Parasitol. 1998, 28, 1791–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gustinelli, A.; Caffara, M.; Florio, D.; Otachi, E.O.; Wathuta, E.M.; Fioravanti, M.L. First description of the adult stage of Clinostomum cutaneum Paperna, 1964 (Digenea: Clinostomidae) from grey herons Ardea cinerea L. and a redescription of the metacercaria from the Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus niloticus (L.) in Kenya. Syst. Parasitol. 2010, 76, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gandolfi, G.; Tongiorgi, P. Taxonomic position, distribution and biology of the gobies present in the Italian fresh-waters, Padogobius martensi (Giinther) and Gobius niigricans Canestrini (Osteichthyes, Gobiidae). Ann. Mus. Civ. St. Nat. Genova 1974, 80, 92–118. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zaharieva, R.G.; Zaharieva, P.G.; Kirin, D.A. Ecological study on helminths of three species of Gobiidae from the Danube River, Bulgaria. Helminthologia 2023, 60, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Franceschini, R.; Guardone, L.; Armani, A.; Ranucci, D.; Roila, R.; Valiani, A.; Susini, F.; Branciari, R. Five-years management of an emerging parasite risk (Eustrongylides sp., Nematoda) in a fishery supply chain located on Trasimeno Lake (Italy). Food Control 2022, 136, 108858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Castiglione, D.; Di Maggio, M.; Guardone, L.; Ricci, E.; Tinacci, L.; Guglielmone, G.; Coltraro, M.; Susini, F.; Armani, A. Eustrongylides excisus in fish species caught in the Massaciuccoli Lake (Northwest Tuscany, Italy): Implications for freshwater fish quality and public health. Food Control 2023, 153, 109894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Prearo, M.; Menconi, V.; Bondavalli, F.; Gabetti, A.; Manganza, A.; Abbà, M.; Bezzo Llufrio, T.; Zanoli, A.; Esposito, G.; Pastorino, P. Distribuzione e prevalenza di Eustrongylides excisus nella fauna ittica lacustre del Piemonte. Ittiopatologia 2023, 20, 27–53. [Google Scholar]
  39. Maganza, A.; Mossotto, C.; Rizzioli, B.; Esposito, G.; Gabetti, A.; Bondavalli, F.; Aimone, B.; Bovero, S.; Pastorino, P.; Prearo, M. Primo ritrovamento di Eustrongylides excisus nel Parco Naturale dei Laghi di Avigliana (TO). In Proceedings of the XXVIII Convegno Nazionale Società Italiana di Patologia Ittica, Cesenatico, Italy, 27–28 June 2024; Available online: https://www.sipi-online.it/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Atti_XXVIII-Convegno-SIPI_Cesenatico.pdf (accessed on 23 May 2025).
  40. Guardone, L.; Ricci, E.; Susini, F.; Polsinelli, E.; Guglielmone, G.; Armani, A. First detection of Eustrongylides excisus (Nematoda: Dioctophymatidae) in big-scale sand smelt (Atherina boyeri) from the lake Massaciuccoli (Northwest Tuscany, Italy): Implications for public health and seafood quality. Food Control 2021, 120, 107517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Švažas, S.; Chukalova, N.; Grishanov, G.; Pūtys, Ž.; Sruoga, A.; Butkauskas, D.; Raudonikis, L.; Prakas, P. The role of great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis) for fish stock and dispersal of helminthes parasites in the Curonian Lagoon area. Vet. Med. Zoot. 2011, 55, 79–85. [Google Scholar]
  42. Delmastro, G.B.; Boano, G.; Conte, P.L.; Fenoglio, S. Great cormorant predation on Cisalpine pike: A conservation conflict. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2015, 61, 743–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Root, T.L.; Price, J.T.; Hall, K.R.; Schneider, S.H.; Rosenzweig, C.; Pounds, J.A. Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 2003, 421, 57–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tøttrup, A.P.; Thorup, K.; Rainio, K.; Yosef, R.; Lehikoinen, E.; Rahbek, C. Avian migrants adjust migration in response to environmental conditions en route. Biol. Lett. 2008, 4, 685–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Polley, L.; Thompson, R.A. Parasite zoonoses and climate change: Molecular tools for tracking shifting boundaries. Trends Parasitol. 2009, 25, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Soana, E.; Gervasio, M.P.; Granata, T.; Colombo, D.; Castaldelli, G. Climate change impacts on eutrophication in the Po River (Italy): Temperature-mediated reduction in nitrogen export but no effect on phosphorus. J. Environ. Sci. 2024, 143, 148–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Verdonschot, P.F. Oligochaetes and eutrophication; an experiment over four years in outdoor mesocosms. Hydrobiologia 1996, 334, 169–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bo, T.; López-Rodríguez, M.J.; Fenoglio, S.; Cammarata, M.; de Figueroa, J.M.T. Feeding habits of Padogobius bonelli (osteichthyes: Gobiidae) in the curone creek (northwest Italy): Territoriality influences diet? J. Freshw. Ecol. 2010, 25, 367–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Timi, J.T.; Poulin, R. Why ignoring parasites in fish ecology is a mistake. Int. J. Parasitol. 2020, 50, 755–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Life cycle of Eustrongylides nematodes. (a) Definitive hosts; (b) eggs; (c) aquatic oligochaetes as first intermediate hosts; (d) fishes as second intermediate hosts; (e) paratenic hosts. Image created by Alice Gabetti, co-author.
Figure 1. Life cycle of Eustrongylides nematodes. (a) Definitive hosts; (b) eggs; (c) aquatic oligochaetes as first intermediate hosts; (d) fishes as second intermediate hosts; (e) paratenic hosts. Image created by Alice Gabetti, co-author.
Fishes 10 00254 g001
Figure 2. (A) Number of scientific articles related to “Eustrongylides” published per year (1980–2024); (B) geographical distribution of publications by country (Scopus database; https://www.scopus.com/home.uri?zone=header&origin=sbrowse (accessed on 23 May 2025)).
Figure 2. (A) Number of scientific articles related to “Eustrongylides” published per year (1980–2024); (B) geographical distribution of publications by country (Scopus database; https://www.scopus.com/home.uri?zone=header&origin=sbrowse (accessed on 23 May 2025)).
Fishes 10 00254 g002
Figure 3. Location of the three sampling sites along the Po River: Moncalieri (44°59′56.5″ N 7°40′29.5″ E), Murazzi (45°03′52.8″ N 7°42′00.8″ E), and San Mauro (45°06′18.9″ N 7°45′53.4″ E). The map was generated using QGIS software, version 3.40.2-Bratislava.
Figure 3. Location of the three sampling sites along the Po River: Moncalieri (44°59′56.5″ N 7°40′29.5″ E), Murazzi (45°03′52.8″ N 7°42′00.8″ E), and San Mauro (45°06′18.9″ N 7°45′53.4″ E). The map was generated using QGIS software, version 3.40.2-Bratislava.
Fishes 10 00254 g003
Figure 4. Padogobius bonelli parasitized by Eustrongylides excisus: (a) the parasite protruding from the fish abdominal cavity, and (b) the parasite removed and placed next to the host for size comparison.
Figure 4. Padogobius bonelli parasitized by Eustrongylides excisus: (a) the parasite protruding from the fish abdominal cavity, and (b) the parasite removed and placed next to the host for size comparison.
Fishes 10 00254 g004
Figure 5. Microscopic view of Eustrongylides excisus larva (A); details of anterior part (B) and tail (C).
Figure 5. Microscopic view of Eustrongylides excisus larva (A); details of anterior part (B) and tail (C).
Fishes 10 00254 g005
Table 1. Species, origin (native, N/non-native, NN), and number (No) of specimens sampled per site, with mean and standard deviation of total weight and total length.
Table 1. Species, origin (native, N/non-native, NN), and number (No) of specimens sampled per site, with mean and standard deviation of total weight and total length.
Sampling SitesSpeciesOriginMean Weight (g)Mean Length (cm)No.
MoncalieriBarbus barbusNN26.67 ± 28.3212.58 ± 4.3826
Telestes muticellusN11.16101
Squalius squalusN1.03 ± 0.274.5 ± 0.712
Rhodeus amarusNN2.61 ± 0.566.75 ± 0.964
Padogobius bonelliN2.49 ± 1.166.31 ± 1.448
Salmo truttaNN90.39211
MurazziLeuciscus sp.NN1.74 ± 2.395.05 ± 1.8622
Barbus barbusNN9.16 ± 5.979.56 ± 3.119
Romanogobio benacensisN8.95111
Padogobius bonelliN1.90 ± 0.934.92 ± 1.026
Carassius carassiusNN2.14 ± 1.645 ± 1.412
Lepomis gibbosusNN7.488.51
Pseudorasbora parvaNN2.31 ± 0.257.25 ± 0.352
Cobitis bilineataN1.69 ± 0.866.75 ± 2.076
Rhodeus amarusNN2.51 ± 0.385.69 ± 0.378
San MauroPadogobius bonelliN3.43 ± 3.446.13 ± 2.294
Silurus glanisNN56.52211
Rhodeus amarusNN1.4651
Cobitis bilineataN1.99 ± 0.887.13 ± 1.038
Telestes muticellusN7.21 ± 2.258.17 ± 0.763
Perca fluviatilisNN63.4418.51
Pseudorasbora parvaNN2.68 ± 0.346.58 ± 0.104
Barbus barbusNN12.05 ± 5.439.73 ± 1.4528
Squalius squalusN0.64 ± 0.214.02 ± 0.8021
Table 2. Reports of Eustrongylides excisus in Italy. Sampling location, fish host, and the parasitological indexes are indicated.
Table 2. Reports of Eustrongylides excisus in Italy. Sampling location, fish host, and the parasitological indexes are indicated.
RegionWater BasinYear of SamplingFish SpeciesParasitological Index *References
P%MIMA
UmbriaLake Trasimeno2015P. fluviatilis6.841NA[25]
M. salmoides1.891NA
A. boyeri0.131NA
Lake Trasimeno2021P. fluviatilis67.998.286[36]
M. salmoides0.2610.003
T. tinca0.1310.0013
A. melas2.7210.0273
C. carpio0.0210.0002
TuscanyLake Massacciuccoli2019A. boyeri2.310.2[40]
Lake Massacciuccoli2022A. melas28.61.70.49[37]
S. glanis755.74.3
C. ramadaNANA0.07
L. gibbosus4.310.04
M. salmoides2510.25
A. boyeri5.110.05
Lombardy–VenetoLake Garda2020P. fluviatilis14.4110.014[5]
M. salmoides301.330.4
L. gibbosus3.1010.023
Piedmont–Lombardy–SwissLake Maggiore2019–2022P. fluviatilis8.20–201.540.15[38]
PiedmontLake Viverone2019–2022P. fluviatilis25.331.110.28
L. gibbosus40.831.010.44
Lake Candia2019–2022L. gibbosus92.042.862.63
M. salmoides83.8210.84
Lake Sirio2019–2022L. gibbosus2.8610.03
Lake Pistono2019–2022L. gibbosus2.671.580.04
Lake Nero2019–2022P. fluviatilis5.411.250.07
L. gibbosus10.321.230.13
Lake San Michele2019–2022P. fluviatilis101.670.17
L. gibbosus18.291.530.28
M. salmoides17.8610.179
Lake Alice Superiore2019–2022P. fluviatilis4.2910.04
L. gibbosus2.571.120.03
Great Lake of Avigliana2023L. gibbosusNANANA[39]
A. melasNANANA
* P%: prevalence; MI: mean intensity; MA: mean abundance; NA: not available.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maganza, A.; Mossotto, C.; Gabetti, A.; Gozlan, R.E.; Combe, M.; Esposito, G.; Bondavalli, F.; Bertoli, M.; Pizzul, E.; Pastorino, P.; et al. Expanding Host Range: First Record of Eustrongylides excisus in Padogobius bonelli (Gobiidae) from the Po River (Northwest Italy). Fishes 2025, 10, 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10060254

AMA Style

Maganza A, Mossotto C, Gabetti A, Gozlan RE, Combe M, Esposito G, Bondavalli F, Bertoli M, Pizzul E, Pastorino P, et al. Expanding Host Range: First Record of Eustrongylides excisus in Padogobius bonelli (Gobiidae) from the Po River (Northwest Italy). Fishes. 2025; 10(6):254. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10060254

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maganza, Alessandra, Camilla Mossotto, Alice Gabetti, Rodolphe Elie Gozlan, Marine Combe, Giuseppe Esposito, Fabio Bondavalli, Marco Bertoli, Elisabetta Pizzul, Paolo Pastorino, and et al. 2025. "Expanding Host Range: First Record of Eustrongylides excisus in Padogobius bonelli (Gobiidae) from the Po River (Northwest Italy)" Fishes 10, no. 6: 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10060254

APA Style

Maganza, A., Mossotto, C., Gabetti, A., Gozlan, R. E., Combe, M., Esposito, G., Bondavalli, F., Bertoli, M., Pizzul, E., Pastorino, P., & Prearo, M. (2025). Expanding Host Range: First Record of Eustrongylides excisus in Padogobius bonelli (Gobiidae) from the Po River (Northwest Italy). Fishes, 10(6), 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10060254

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop