Next Article in Journal
Analogy and Communication
Next Article in Special Issue
Why You Don’t Have to Choose between Accuracy and Human Officiating (But You Might Want to Anyway)
Previous Article in Journal
Logical Problems in Analysis of Analogy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sports Tournaments and Social Choice Theory
Open AccessArticle

Chips and Showmanship: Running and Technology

Philosophy Department, Missouri State University, Springfield, MO 65809, USA
Philosophies 2019, 4(2), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies4020030
Received: 23 April 2019 / Revised: 10 May 2019 / Accepted: 1 June 2019 / Published: 5 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Philosophical Issues in Sport Science)
A brief review and classification of technology in general begins the paper, followed by an application of the classification to two specific marathon case studies: the 2018 Boston marathon and the 2017 Nike Breaking2 Project marathon. Then concepts from an array of sport philosophers are discussed to suggest an explanation for why each of the case studies strikes us as problematic. The conclusion provides a reasonable explanation for our misgivings, as well as an indication of how we might evaluate sporting endeavors in the face of increasing technological innovation. View Full-Text
Keywords: technology; running; fairness; competition technology; running; fairness; competition
MDPI and ACS Style

Sailors, P.R. Chips and Showmanship: Running and Technology. Philosophies 2019, 4, 30.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop