Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Contemporary Natural Philosophy and Philosophies
Previous Article in Journal
Quantum Discontents, or What Is Wrong with Our Science Practice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Philosophia Naturalis Rediviva: Natural Philosophy for the Twenty-First Century
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Philosophies 2018, 3(4), 41;

The Naturalization of Natural Philosophy

International Center for the Philosophy of Information, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’An 710049, China
Received: 29 August 2018 / Revised: 1 October 2018 / Accepted: 4 October 2018 / Published: 24 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Contemporary Natural Philosophy and Philosophies - Part 1)
Full-Text   |   PDF [307 KB, uploaded 26 November 2018]


A new demarcation is proposed between Natural Philosophy and non-Natural Philosophy—philosophy tout court—based on whether or not they follow a non-standard logic of real processes. This non-propositional logic, Logic in Reality (LIR), is based on the original work of the Franco-Romanian thinker Stéphane Lupasco (Bucharest, 1900–Paris, 1988). Many Natural Philosophies remain bounded by dependence on binary linguistic concepts of logic. I claim that LIR can naturalize—bring into science—part of such philosophies. Against the potential objection that my approach blurs the distinction between science and philosophy, I reply that there is no problem in differentiating experimental physical science and philosophy; any complete distinction between philosophy, including the philosophy of science(s) and the other sciences is invidious. It was historically unnecessary and is unnecessary today. The convergence of science and philosophy, proposed by Wu Kun based on implications of the philosophy of information, supports this position. LIR provides a rigorous basis for giving equivalent ontological value to diversity and identity, what is contradictory, inconsistent, absent, missing or past, unconscious, incomplete, and fuzzy as to their positive counterparts. The naturalized Natural Philosophy resulting from the application of these principles is a candidate for the ‘new synthesis’ called for by the editors. View Full-Text
Keywords: common good; contradiction; ethics; information; logic; naturalization; realism; science; synthesis common good; contradiction; ethics; information; logic; naturalization; realism; science; synthesis
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Brenner, J.E. The Naturalization of Natural Philosophy. Philosophies 2018, 3, 41.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Philosophies EISSN 2409-9287 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top