Previous Article in Journal
Incorporating Next-Generation Sequencing in Newborn Screening for Organic Acidemias
 
 
Due to scheduled maintenance work on our servers, there may be short service disruptions on this website between 11:00 and 12:00 CEST on March 28th.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on Integrating Genomic Sequencing into Newborn Screening: An Interview Study

1
Centre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3721 MA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
2
Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute and Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2026, 12(2), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns12020019
Submission received: 12 December 2025 / Revised: 25 February 2026 / Accepted: 24 March 2026 / Published: 26 March 2026

Abstract

Interest in the genomic sequencing of healthy newborns has raised a discussion on whether this technology should be introduced into existing newborn screening (NBS) programs. This qualitative study explores a multi-stakeholder perspective on the future of genomic sequencing in NBS. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 professionals involved in NBS or in clinical genome sequencing in the Netherlands. Participants highlighted opportunities such as the possibility to use one test for a wide range of genetic conditions, reducing diagnostic odyssey, expanding the scope of NBS, and increasing program efficiency. Challenges were raised regarding genetic variant interpretation, expected increased parental anxiety, data privacy issues, difficulties with information provision, and high costs. Three areas of tension between participants’ perspectives were identified: screening strategy, screening performance, and roles and responsibilities. It was emphasized that implementing genomic sequencing should not risk reducing the current high NBS participation, and that enhancing knowledge, communication, and collaboration between all stakeholders is needed. Although most participants did not believe genomic sequencing as a first-tier test is currently desirable and feasible, they acknowledged it has a role to play in the future of NBS. Future decision-making should consider the potential impact on the participation rate, program quality, and balancing benefits and harms.
Keywords: newborn screening; neonatal; stakeholder perspectives; interviews; genomic sequencing newborn screening; neonatal; stakeholder perspectives; interviews; genomic sequencing

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Smits, S.G.; Onstwedder, S.M.; Rigter, T.; Rodenburg, W.; Henneman, L. A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on Integrating Genomic Sequencing into Newborn Screening: An Interview Study. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2026, 12, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns12020019

AMA Style

Smits SG, Onstwedder SM, Rigter T, Rodenburg W, Henneman L. A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on Integrating Genomic Sequencing into Newborn Screening: An Interview Study. International Journal of Neonatal Screening. 2026; 12(2):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns12020019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Smits, Saskia G., Suzanne M. Onstwedder, Tessel Rigter, Wendy Rodenburg, and Lidewij Henneman. 2026. "A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on Integrating Genomic Sequencing into Newborn Screening: An Interview Study" International Journal of Neonatal Screening 12, no. 2: 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns12020019

APA Style

Smits, S. G., Onstwedder, S. M., Rigter, T., Rodenburg, W., & Henneman, L. (2026). A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on Integrating Genomic Sequencing into Newborn Screening: An Interview Study. International Journal of Neonatal Screening, 12(2), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns12020019

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop