A 25-Year Retrospective on Bavaria’s Newborn Screening Programme: Achievements, Challenges and Long-Term Follow-Up
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Framework of NBS in Germany
2.1.1. NBS Process
2.1.2. Laboratory Analysis
2.2. Responsibilities of the Bavarian NBS Centre
2.2.1. Programme Implementation, Coordination and Development
2.2.2. Ensuring Complete Coverage
2.2.3. Tracking of Repeat Tests
2.2.4. Ensuring Process Quality
2.2.5. Bavarian NBS Long-Term Follow-Up Study of Children Born 1999–2013
2.3. Data Bases and Methods of Data Analysis
2.3.1. NBS in Bavaria
2.3.2. Bavarian Prospective NBS Long-Term Follow-Up Study
3. Results
3.1. The Bavarian Newborn Screening Programme over 25 Years (1999–2023)
3.1.1. Coverage
3.1.2. From Blood Collection to Result Reporting
3.1.3. Requested Repeat Screening Tests
3.1.4. Recall Rates
3.1.5. Specificity and Positive Predictive Values (PPVs)
3.1.6. Positive Cases, Birth Prevalence
3.1.7. Children Not Identified Through NBS
3.1.8. Age at Initiation of Care or Therapy
3.1.9. Setting of Confirmatory Diagnostics
3.2. Results of the Bavarian NBS Long-Term Follow-Up Study (Birth Cohort 1999–2013)
3.2.1. Study Population
3.2.2. Medical Care
3.2.3. Decompensation Episodes
3.2.4. Height and Body Mass Index
3.2.5. Developmental Benchmarks and School Careers
3.2.6. Behaviour and Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents
3.2.7. Summary of Long-Term Follow-Up Outcomes
3.2.8. Challenges and Burdens Experienced by Parents
- Considerably long distances to specialised centres in a large federal state like Bavaria.
- Occasions where medical personnel outside specialised centres of expertise appeared insufficiently informed about NBS conditions and did not utilise emergency protocols provided by the patients or their family. This was perceived as alarming, especially in emergency situations that may not be directly related to the condition, such as accidents, yet require interventions specific to the condition.
- Difficulties implementing therapeutic recommendations in daily life, such as ensuring adherence to diet and medication during full-day care or school excursions. Additionally, consistently carrying emergency cards posed a challenge for some children.
- Financial burdens associated with certain conditions, including the cost of specialised foods not reimbursed by health insurance.
4. Discussion
4.1. Experiences from 25 Years of the Bavarian Newborn Screening Programme
4.1.1. Coverage
4.1.2. Tracking of Requested Repeat Tests
4.1.3. Processing Times
4.1.4. Quality Criteria of the Bavarian NBS Programme
4.1.5. Confirmatory Diagnostics and Notification of Positive NBS Results
4.1.6. Birth Prevalences
4.2. Bavarian NBS Long-Term Follow-Up Study
4.2.1. Results of the Bavarian NBS Long-Term Follow-Up Study
4.2.2. Overall Evaluation of the Long-Term Follow-Up Study, Strengths and Limitations
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| BMI | Body Mass Index |
| CACT | Carnitine-Acylcarnitine Translocase Deficiency (carnitine cycle defect) |
| CAH | Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia |
| Carnitine cycle defects | Carnitine-Acylcarnitine Translocase Deficiency, Carnitine Palmitoyl Transferase I/II Deficiency |
| CF | Cystic Fibrosis (Mucoviscidosis) |
| CFTR-gene | cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene |
| CI | Confidence Interval |
| CPTI/II | Carnitine Palmitoyl Transferase I/II Deficiency (carnitine cycle defects) |
| DBS | Dried Blood Spot |
| DDST | Denver Developmental Screening Test |
| DGNS Report | National Screening Report Germany |
| EU | European Union |
| GA I | Glutaric Acidemia Type I |
| HPA | Hyperphenylalaninemia |
| HRQoL | Health-related quality of life |
| IRT | Immunoreactive Trypsinogen |
| IEM | Inborn Error of Metabolism |
| IVA | Isovaleric Acidemia |
| KiGGS | German Health Survey for Children and Adolescents |
| KINDL | Questionnaire on Health-related Quality of Life |
| LCHADD | Long-Chain 3-Hydroxyacyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency/Mitochondrial Trifunctional Protein Deficiency |
| LTFU | Long-Term Follow-Up |
| MCADD | Medium-Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency |
| MS/MS | Tandem Mass Spectrometry |
| MSUD | Maple Syrup Urine Disease |
| NBS | Newborn Screening using Dried Blood Spots |
| PAP | Pancreatitis-Associated Protein |
| PKU | Phenylketonuria |
| PPV | Positive Predictive Value |
| SCD | Sickle Cell Disease |
| SCID | Severe Combined Immunodeficiency |
| SDS | Standard Deviation Score |
| SDQ | Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire |
| SMA | Spinal Muscular Atrophy |
| Suppl. | Supplement |
| VLCADD | Very-Long-Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency |
| WHO | World Health Organisation |
| 2nd tier testing | Second examination of additional parameters or alternative method of analysis with the same test card in case of abnormal finding |
References
- Hoffmann, G.F.; Lindner, M.; Loeber, J.G. 50 years of newborn screening. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2014, 37, 163–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jansen, M.E.; Lister, K.J.; van Kranen, H.J.; Cornel, M.C. Policy Making in Newborn Screening Needs a Structured and Transparent Approach. Front. Public Health 2017, 5, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- González-Irazabal, Y.; Hernandez de Abajo, G.; Martínez-Morillo, E. Identifying and overcoming barriers to harmonize newborn screening programs through consensus strategies. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2021, 58, 29–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Webster, D. Quality performance of newborn screening systems: Strategies for improvement. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2007, 30, 576–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cornel, M.C.; Rigter, T.; Weinreich, S.S.; Burgard, P.; Hoffmann, G.F.; Lindner, M.; Gerard Loeber, J.; Rupp, K.; Taruscio, D.; Vittozzi, L. A framework to start the debate on neonatal screening policies in the EU: An Expert Opinion Document. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2013, 22, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). NBS02-A2: Newborn Screening Follow-Up; Approved Guideline, 2nd ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2013; ISBN 1-56238-876-2. [Google Scholar]
- Nennstiel-Ratzel, U.; Lüders, A.; Blankenstein, O. Neugeborenenscreening: Ein Paradebeispiel für effektive Sekundärprävention. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2015, 58, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Therrell, B.L.; Padilla, C.D.; Loeber, J.G.; Kneisser, I.; Saadallah, A.; Borrajo, G.J.C.; Adams, J. Current status of newborn screening worldwide: 2015. Semin. Perinatol. 2015, 39, 171–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kemper, A.R.; Boyle, C.A.; Brosco, J.P.; Grosse, S.D. Ensuring the Life-Span Benefits of Newborn Screening. Pediatrics 2019, 144, e20190904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mütze, U.; Garbade, S.F.; Gramer, G.; Lindner, M.; Freisinger, P.; Grünert, S.C.; Hennermann, J.; Ensenauer, R.; Thimm, E.; Zirnbauer, J.; et al. Long-term Outcomes of Individuals with Metabolic Diseases Identified Through Newborn Screening. Pediatrics 2020, 146, e20200444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gramer, G.; Nennstiel-Ratzel, U.; Hoffmann, G.F. 50 Jahre Neugeborenenscreening in Deutschland. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkd. 2018, 166, 987–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nennstiel-Ratzel, U.; Liebl, B.; Zapf, A. Modellprojekt zur Neuordnung des Neugeborenen-Screenings in Bayern. Gesundheitswesen 2003, 65, S31–S35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wilson, J.; Jungner, G. Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1968; Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/37650 (accessed on 11 November 2021).
- Liebl, B.; Nennstiel-Ratzel, U.; von Kries, R.; Fingerhut, R.; Olgemöller, B.; Zapf, A.; Roscher, A.A. Expanded newborn screening in Bavaria: Tracking to achieve requested repeat testing. Prev. Med. 2002, 34, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liebl, B.; von Kries, R.; Nennstiel-Ratzel, U.; Muntau, A.C.; Röschinger, W.; Olgemöller, B.; Zapf, A.; Roscher, A.A. Ethisch-rechtliche Aspekte des Neugeborenenscreenings. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkd. 2001, 149, 1326–1335. [Google Scholar]
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin (DGKJ). Neue Screening-Richtlinien. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkd. 2002, 150, 1424–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (G-BA). Richtlinien des Bundesausschusses der Ärzte und Krankenkassen über die Früherkennung von Krankheiten bei Kindern bis zur Vollendung des 6. Lebensjahres (“Kinder-Richtlinien”). Available online: https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/62-492-68/RL_Kinder-2004-12-21.pdf (accessed on 28 August 2024).
- Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (G-BA). Beschlussbegründung über eine Änderung der Kinder-Richtlinien zur Einführung des Erweiterten Neugeborenen-Screenings vom 21. Dezember 2004. Available online: https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/40-268-36/2004-12-21-TMS-Begruendung.pdf (accessed on 9 July 2024).
- Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (G-BA). Richtlinie des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschuss über die Früherkennung von Krankheiten bei Kindern (Kinder-Richtlinie): Fassung vom 18. Juni 2015 Bundesanzeiger AT 18.08.2016 B1. Zuletzt Geändert am 21. März 2024, Bundesanzeiger AT 12.07.2024 B3, in Kraft Getreten am 13. Juli 2024, Anzuwenden ab 12.01.2025. Available online: https://www.g-ba.de/richtlinien/15/ (accessed on 5 August 2024).
- Nennstiel, U.; Brockow, I.; Odenwald, B. Neugeborenen-Screening in Deutschland. Pädiatrie Up2date 2023, 18, 105–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- German Society for Neonatal Screening. National Screening Report Germany 2022. Available online: https://www.screening-dgns.de/Pdf/Screeningreports/DGNS-Screeningreport-e_2022.pdf (accessed on 12 September 2025).
- Lüders, A.; Blankenstein, O.; Brockow, I.; Ensenauer, R.; Lindner, M.; Schulze, A.; Nennstiel, U. Neonatal Screening for Congenital Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders: Results from Germany for the Years 2006–2018. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2021, 118, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maier, E.M.; Mütze, U.; Janzen, N.; Steuerwald, U.; Nennstiel, U.; Odenwald, B.; Schuhmann, E.; Lotz-Havla, A.S.; Weiss, K.J.; Hammersen, J.; et al. Collaborative evaluation study on 18 candidate diseases for newborn screening in 1.77 million samples. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2023, 46, 1043–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Röschinger, W.; Sonnenschein, S.; Schuhmann, E.; Nennstiel-Ratzel, U.; Roscher, A.A.; Olgemöller, B. Neue Zielerkrankungen im Neugeborenenscreening. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkd. 2015, 163, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bundesgesundheitsministerium. Gesetz über Genetische Untersuchungen bei Menschen (Gendiagnostikgesetz, GenDG). Available online: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gendg/BJNR252900009.html (accessed on 12 September 2025).
- Gesellschaft für Neonatologie und Pädiatrische Intensivmedizin. AWMF-S2k-Leitlinie 024/012 “Neugeborenen-Screening auf Angeborene Stoffwechselstörungen, Endokrinopathien, Schwere Kombinierte Immundefekte (SCID), Sichelzellkrankheit, 5q-Assoziierte Spinale Muskelatrophie (SMA) und Mukoviszidose”. Available online: https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/024-012.html (accessed on 5 September 2025).
- Loeber, J.G.; Platis, D.; Zetterström, R.H.; Almashanu, S.; Boemer, F.; Bonham, J.R.; Borde, P.; Brincat, I.; Cheillan, D.; Dekkers, E.; et al. Neonatal Screening in Europe Revisited: An ISNS Perspective on the Current State and Developments Since 2010. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2021, 7, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- German Society for Neonatal Screening. National Screening Reports Germany. Available online: https://www.screening-dgns.de/reports.php (accessed on 12 September 2025).
- Bayerische Staatsregierung. Verordnung zur Übermittlung von Meldedaten (Meldedatenverordnung—MeldDV). Available online: https://www.gesetze-bayern.de/Content/Document/BayMeldDV (accessed on 12 September 2025).
- Bayerische Staatsregierung. Gesetz über den Öffentlichen Gesundheitsdienst (GDG). Available online: https://www.gesetze-bayern.de/Content/Document/BayGDG (accessed on 12 September 2025).
- Bayerische Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Qualitätssicherung in der Stationären Versorgung. Qualitätssicherung Geburtshilfe. Jahresauswertungen der Bayerischen Perinatalerhebung: Gesamtstatistik, München, 1999–2013. Available online: https://lag-by.de/qs-verfahren/deqs-richtlinie/qs-pm/ (accessed on 13 June 2024).
- Ravens-Sieberer, U.; Erhart, M.; Rajmil, L.; Herdman, M.; Auquier, P.; Bruil, J.; Power, M.; Duer, W.; Abel, T.; Czemy, L.; et al. Reliability, construct and criterion validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 score: A short measure for children and adolescents’ well-being and health-related quality of life. Qual. Life Res. 2010, 19, 1487–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neuhauser, H.; Schienkiewitz, A.; Schaffrath Rosario, A.; Dortschy, R.; Kurth, B.-M. Referenzperzentile für Anthropometrische Maßzahlen und Blutdruck aus der Studie zur Gesundheit von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland (KiGGS). Beiträge zur Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes: 2011. Available online: https://edoc.rki.de/bitstream/handle/176904/3254/28jWMa04ZjppM.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 1 August 2023).
- Kurth, B.-M.; Schaffrath Rosario, A. Übergewicht und Adipositas bei Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2010, 53, 643–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schienkiewitz, A.; Damerow, S.; Mauz, E.; Vogelgesang, F.; Kuhnert, R.; Schaffrath Rosario, A. Entwicklung von Übergewicht und Adipositas bei Kindern—Ergebnisse der KiGGS-Kohorte. J. Health Monit. 2018, 3, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michaelis, R.; Berger, R.; Nennstiel-Ratzel, U.; Krägeloh-Mann, I. Validierte und teilvalidierte Grenzsteine der Entwicklung. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkd. 2013, 161, 898–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nennstiel-Ratzel, U.; Lüders, A.; Arenz, S.; Wildner, M.; Michaelis, R. Elternfragebögen zu Grenzsteinen der kindlichen Entwicklung im Alter von 1 bis 6 Jahren. Kinderärztliche Prax. 2013, 84, 106–114. [Google Scholar]
- Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Unterricht und Kultus. Bayerns Schulen in Zahlen 2022/2023; Reihe A Bildungsstatistik; Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Unterricht und Kultus: Munich, Germany, 2023; p. 19. [Google Scholar]
- Goodman, R. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Research Note. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 1997, 38, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodman, R.; Ford, T.; Simmons, H.; Gatward, R.; Meltzer, H. Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. Br. J. Psychiatry 2000, 177, 534–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hölling, H.; Erhart, M.; Ravens-Sieberer, U.; Schlack, R. Verhaltensauffälligkeiten bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Erste Ergebnisse aus dem Kinder- und Jugendgesundheitssurvey (KiGGS). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2007, 50, 784–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hölling, H.; Schlack, R.; Petermann, F.; Ravens-Sieberer, U.; Mauz, E. Psychische Auffälligkeiten und psychosoziale Beeinträchtigungen bei Kindern und Jugendlichen im Alter von 3 bis 17 Jahren in Deutschland—Prävalenz und zeitliche Trends zu 2 Erhebungszeitpunkten (2003–2006 und 2009–2012): Ergebnisse der KiGGS-Studie—Erste Folgebefragung (KiGGS Welle 1). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2014, 57, 807–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ravens-Sieberer, U.; Bullinger, M. Assessing health-related quality of life in chronically ill children with the German KINDL: First psychometric and content analytical results. Qual. Life Res. 1998, 7, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ravens-Sieberer, U.; Klasen, F.; Bichmann, H.; Otto, C.; Quitmann, J.; Bullinger, M. Erfassung der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität von Kindern und Jugendlichen. Gesundheitswesen 2013, 75, 667–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ravens-Sieberer, U.; Ellert, U.; Erhart, M. Gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland. Eine Normstichprobe für Deutschland aus dem Kinder- und Jugendgesundheitssurvey (KIGGS). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2007, 50, 810–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Statistisches Bundesamt. Bevölkerungsstatistik. Available online: https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online#astructure (accessed on 18 September 2024).
- Dubinski, I.; Marzi, C.; Nennstiel, U.; Schiergens, K.; Schmidt, H.; Odenwald, B. Newborn screening follow-up in Bavaria: Height and weight in paediatric patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2025, 38, 132–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- WHO. Screening Programmes: A Short Guide: Increase Effectiveness, Maximize Benefits and Minimize Harm. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/330829/9789289054782-eng.pdf (accessed on 5 September 2025).
- Cornel, M.; Rigter, T.; Weinreich, S.; Burgard, P.; Hoffmann, G.F.; Lindner, M.; Loeber, J.G.; Rupp, K.; Taruscio, D.; Vittozzi, L. Newborn screening in Europe: Expert Opinion Document. 2011. Available online: https://www.isns-neoscreening.org/guidelines/ (accessed on 15 October 2021).
- Webster, D.; Gaviglio, A.; Khan, A.H.; Baker, M.; Cheillan, D.; Chabraoui, L.; Abdoh, G.; Cabello, J.; Giugliani, R.; Platis, D.; et al. ISNS General Guidelines for Neonatal Bloodspot Screening 2025. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2025, 11, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonham, J.R. Impact of new screening technologies: Should we screen and does phenotype influence this decision? J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2013, 36, 681–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boyle, C.A.; Bocchini, J.A., Jr.; Kelly, J. Reflections on 50 years of newborn screening. Pediatrics 2014, 133, 961–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ficicioglu, C. New tools and approaches to newborn screening: Ready to open Pandora’s box? Cold Spring Harb. Mol. Case Stud. 2017, 3, a001842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andermann, A.; Blancquaert, I.; Beauchamp, S.; Costea, I. Guiding policy decisions for genetic screening: Developing a systematic and transparent approach. Public Health Genom. 2011, 14, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Percenti, L.; Vickery, G. Newborn Screening Follow-up. N. C. Med. J. 2019, 80, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lajic, S.; Karlsson, L.; Zetterström, R.H.; Falhammar, H.; Nordenström, A. The Success of a Screening Program Is Largely Dependent on Close Collaboration between the Laboratory and the Clinical Follow-Up of the Patients. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2020, 6, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Odenwald, B.; Brockow, I.; Hanauer, M.; Lüders, A.; Nennstiel, U. Is Our Newborn Screening Working Well? A Literature Review of Quality Requirements for Newborn Blood Spot Screening (NBS) Infrastructure and Procedures. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2023, 9, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nennstiel, U.; Brockow, I.; Odenwald, B.; Coenen, M.; Throner, V.; Blankenstein, O.; Vieth, A.; Ratzel, R. Organisatorische Weiterentwicklung des Erweiterten Neugeborenen-Screenings (ENS): Konzept der Bewerbergemeinschaft LGL, LMU, Charité im Auftrag des GKV-Spitzenverbands. Available online: https://www.screening-dgns.de/Pdf/Publikationen/Konzept%20Weiterentwicklung%20Neugeborenen-Screening.pdf (accessed on 28 August 2024).
- Mütze, U.; Nennstiel, U.; Odenwald, B.; Haase, C.; Ceglarek, U.; Janzen, N.; Garbade, S.F.; Hoffmann, G.F.; Kölker, S.; Haas, D. Sudden neonatal death in individuals with medium-chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency: Limit of newborn screening. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2022, 181, 2415–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Odenwald, B.; Dörr, H.-G.; Bonfig, W.; Schmidt, H.; Fingerhut, R.; Wildner, M.; Nennstiel-Ratzel, U. Classic Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia due to 21-Hydroxylase-Deficiency: 13 Years of Neonatal Screening and Follow-up in Bavaria. Klin. Padiatr. 2015, 227, 278–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wilcken, B.; Haas, M.; Joy, P.; Wiley, V.; Bowling, F.; Carpenter, K.; Christodoulou, J.; Cowley, D.; Ellaway, C.; Fletcher, J.; et al. Expanded newborn screening: Outcome in screened and unscreened patients at age 6 years. Pediatrics 2009, 124, e241–e248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rissmann, A.; Koehn, A.; Loderstedt, M.; Schwemmle, C.; Goetze, G.; Bartel, S.; Plontke, S.K.; Langer, J.; Begall, K.; Matulat, P.; et al. Population-based cross-sectional study to assess newborn hearing screening program in central Germany. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2018, 107, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wood, S.A.; Sutton, G.J.; Davis, A.C. Performance and characteristics of the Newborn Hearing Screening Programme in England: The first seven years. Int. J. Audiol. 2015, 54, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seppelt, E. Manipulierte Blutproben im Neugeborenen-Screening im Elisabeth-Krankenhaus in Halle [Manipulated Blood Samples in Newborn Screening at Elisabeth Hospital in Halle]: Keine Gesundheitlichen Nachteile bei Kindern Festgestellt—Aber Jede Dritte Familie Nahm das Testangebot Nicht Wahr. Available online: https://dubisthalle.de/manipulierte-blutproben-im-neugeborenen-screening-im-elisabeth-krankenhaus-in-halle-keine-gesundheitlichen-nachteile-bei-kindern-festgestellt%EF%BF%BC (accessed on 10 December 2025).
- Schreiner, F.; Brack, C.; Salzgeber, K.; Vorhoff, W.; Woelfle, J.; Gohlke, B. False negative 17-hydroxyprogesterone screening in children with classical congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2008, 167, 479–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sydlik, C.; Ermer, U.; Odenwald, B.; Schmidt, H. Neugeborenes mit intersexuellem Genitale bei unauffälligem Neugeborenenscreening. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkd. 2017, 165, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hesse, J.; Braun, C.; Behringer, S.; Matysiak, U.; Spiekerkoetter, U.; Tucci, S. The diagnostic challenge in very-long chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (VLCADD). J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2018, 41, 1169–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steuerwald, U.; Schroeder, C.; Holtkamp, U.; Peter, M.; Sander, J. Fallgruben beim Neugeborenen-Screening: Von falsch-positiven und falsch-negativen Ergebnissen. Pädiatrie Hautnah 2011, 23, 244–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boy, N.; Mengler, K.; Thimm, E.; Schiergens, K.A.; Marquardt, T.; Weinhold, N.; Marquardt, I.; Das, A.M.; Freisinger, P.; Grünert, S.C.; et al. Newborn screening: A disease-changing intervention for glutaric aciduria type 1. Ann. Neurol. 2018, 83, 970–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mengler, K.; Garbade, S.F.; Gleich, F.; Thimm, E.; May, P.; Lindner, M.; Lüsebrink, N.; Marquardt, T.; Hübner, V.; Krämer, J.; et al. Treatment Outcomes for Maple Syrup Urine Disease Detected by Newborn Screening. Pediatrics 2024, 154, e2023064370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sommerburg, O.; Hammermann, J.; Lindner, M.; Stahl, M.; Muckenthaler, M.; Kohlmueller, D.; Happich, M.; Kulozik, A.E.; Stopsack, M.; Gahr, M.; et al. Five years of experience with biochemical cystic fibrosis newborn screening based on IRT/PAP in Germany. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2015, 50, 655–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Odenwald, B.; Fischer, A.; Röschinger, W.; Liebl, B.; Schmidt, H.; Nennstiel, U. Long-Term Course of Hypothyroidism Detected through Neonatal TSH Screening in a Population-Based Cohort of Very Preterm Infants Born at Less than 32 Weeks of Gestation. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2021, 7, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, X.; Huang, Y.-L.; Feng, Y.; Tang, F.; Jia, X.-F.; Chen, Q.-Y.; Tang, C.-F.; Liu, S.-C.; Li, B.; Zheng, R.-D.; et al. Same-sex twins have a high incidence of congenital hypothyroidism and a high probability to be missed at newborn screening. Clin. Chim. Acta 2020, 502, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Medda, E.; Vigone, M.C.; Cassio, A.; Calaciura, F.; Costa, P.; Weber, G.; de Filippis, T.; Gelmini, G.; Di Frenna, M.; Caiulo, S.; et al. Neonatal Screening for Congenital Hypothyroidism: What Can We Learn from Discordant Twins? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 104, 5765–5779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- RIVM (Staatsinstitut für Öffentliche Gesundheit und Umwelt, The Niederlande). Neonatale Registratie Afwijkende Hielprikscreening Neorah. Available online: https://bronnen.zorggegevens.nl/Bron?naam=Neonatale-registratie-afwijkende-hielprikscreening (accessed on 10 December 2025).
- Registret för Medfödda Metabola Sjukdomar RMMS. Om RMMS. Available online: https://rmms.se/om-rmms/ (accessed on 15 November 2021).
- Wilcken, B. Screening for disease in the newborn: The evidence base for blood-spot screening. Pathology 2012, 44, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin (DGKJ). AWMF-S1-Leitlinie 027-021 “Konfirmationsdiagnostik bei Verdacht auf Angeborene Stoffwechselkrankheiten aus dem Neugeborenenscreening”. Available online: https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/027-021.html (accessed on 20 April 2022).
- Deutscher Ethikrat. Herausforderungen im Umgang mit Seltenen Erkrankungen: AD-HOC-EMPFEHLUNG. Berlin. 2018. Available online: https://www.ethikrat.org/publikationen/ad-hoc-empfehlungen/herausforderungen-im-umgang-mit-seltenen-erkrankungen/ (accessed on 10 December 2025).
- Nationales Aktionsbündnis für Menschen mit Seltenen Erkrankungen (NAMSE). Nationaler Aktionsplan für Menschen mit Seltenen Erkrankungen: Handlungsfelder, Empfehlungen und Maßnahmenvorschläge. 2013. Available online: https://www.namse.de/ (accessed on 3 February 2022).
- Brockow, I.; Nennstiel, U. Parents’ experience with positive newborn screening results for cystic fibrosis. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2019, 178, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haitjema, S.; Lubout, C.M.A.; Zijlstra, J.H.M.; Verschoof-Puite, R.K.; van Spronsen, F.J. Communication of an Abnormal Metabolic Newborn Screening Result in the Netherlands: A Qualitative Exploratory Study of the General Practitioner’s Perspective. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2025, 11, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gendiagnostik-Kommission. Stellungnahmen der Gendiagnostik-Kommission—Änderung der Kinder-Richtlinie Aufgrund Aktualisierter Anforderungen an die Durchführung Genetischer Reihenuntersuchungen Gemäß § 23 Absatz 2 Nummer 6 Gendiagnostikgesetz: Erweitertes Neugeborenen-Screening und Mukoviszidose-Screening. Available online: https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Kommissionen/GendiagnostikKommission/Stellungnahmen/Stellungnahme_Kinder-RL.html (accessed on 20 August 2024).
- Sörensen, L.; von Döbeln, U.; Åhlman, H.; Ohlsson, A.; Engvall, M.; Naess, K.; Backman-Johansson, C.; Nordqvist, Y.; Wedell, A.; Zetterström, R.H. Expanded Screening of One Million Swedish Babies with R4S and CLIR for Post-Analytical Evaluation of Data. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2020, 6, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonçalves, M.M.; Marcão, A.; Sousa, C.; Nogueira, C.; Fonseca, H.; Rocha, H.; Vilarinho, L. Portuguese Neonatal Screening Program: A Cohort Study of 18 Years Using MS/MS. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2024, 10, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Müller-Felber, W.; Vill, K.; Schwartz, O.; Gläser, D.; Nennstiel, U.; Wirth, B.; Burggraf, S.; Röschinger, W.; Becker, M.; Durner, J.; et al. Infants Diagnosed with Spinal Muscular Atrophy and 4 SMN2 Copies through Newborn Screening—Opportunity or Burden? J. Neuromuscul. Dis. 2020, 7, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shai, S.; Perez-Becker, R.; Andres, O.; Bakhtiar, S.; Bauman, U.; von Bernuth, H.; Classen, C.-F.; Dückers, G.; El-Helou, S.M.; Gangfuß, A.; et al. Incidence of SCID in Germany from 2014 to 2015 an ESPED* Survey on Behalf of the API*** Erhebungseinheit für Seltene Pädiatrische Erkrankungen in Deutschland (German Paediatric Surveillance Unit)** Arbeitsgemeinschaft Pädiatrische Immunologie. J. Clin. Immunol. 2020, 40, 708–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Speckmann, C.; Nennstiel, U.; Hönig, M.; Albert, M.H.; Ghosh, S.; Schuetz, C.; Brockow, I.; Hörster, F.; Niehues, T.; Ehl, S.; et al. Prospective Newborn Screening for SCID in Germany: A First Analysis by the Pediatric Immunology Working Group (API). J. Clin. Immunol. 2023, 43, 965–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lobitz, S.; Kunz, J.B.; Cario, H.; Hakimeh, D.; Jarisch, A.; Kulozik, A.E.; Oevermann, L.; Grosse, R. Neugeborenenscreening auf Sichelzellkrankheit. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkd. 2021, 68, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sommerburg, O.; Stahl, M.; Hammermann, J.; Okun, J.G.; Kulozik, A.; Hoffmann, G.; Mall, M. Neugeborenenscreening auf Mukoviszidose in Deutschland: Vergleich des neuen Screening-Protokolls mit einem Alternativprotokoll. Klin. Padiatr. 2017, 229, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bittles, A.H.; Black, M.L. Evolution in health and medicine Sackler colloquium: Consanguinity, human evolution, and complex diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 1779–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waters, D.; Adeloye, D.; Woolham, D.; Wastnedge, E.; Patel, S.; Rudan, I. Global birth prevalence and mortality from inborn errors of metabolism: A systematic analysis of the evidence. J. Glob. Health 2018, 8, 21102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobrow, M.J.; Hagens, V.; Chafe, R.; Sullivan, T.; Rabeneck, L. Consolidated principles for screening based on a systematic review and consensus process. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2018, 190, E422–E429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gendiagnostik-Kommission. Richtlinie der Gendiagnostik-Kommission (GEKO) für die Anforderungen an die Durchführung genetischer Reihenuntersuchungen gemäß § 23 Abs. 2 Nr. 6 GenDG: Revidierte Fassung vom 26.06.2020, veröffentlicht und in Kraft getreten am 16.07.2020, ersetzt die Fassung vom 16.11.2012. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2020, 63, 1311–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Landau, Y.E.; Waisbren, S.E.; Chan, L.M.A.; Levy, H.L. Long-term outcome of expanded newborn screening at Boston children’s hospital: Benefits and challenges in defining true disease. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2017, 40, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pourfarzam, M.; Morris, A.; Appleton, M.; Craft, A.; Bartlett, K. Neonatal screening for medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency. Lancet 2001, 358, 1063–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pollitt, R.J.; Leonard, J.V. Prospective surveillance study of medium chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency in the UK. Arch. Dis. Child. 1998, 79, 116–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iafolla, A.K.; Thompson, R.J.; Roe, C.R. Medium-chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency: Clinical course in 120 affected children. J. Pediatr. 1994, 124, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wilcken, B.; Hammond, J.; Silink, M. Morbidity and mortality in medium chain acyl coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency. Arch. Dis. Child. 1994, 70, 410–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilcken, B.; Haas, M.; Joy, P.; Wiley, V.; Chaplin, M.; Black, C.; Fletcher, J.; McGill, J.; Boneh, A. Outcome of neonatal screening for medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency in Australia: A cohort study. Lancet 2007, 369, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Couce, M.L.; Castiñeiras, D.E.; Bóveda, M.D.; Baña, A.; Cocho, J.A.; Iglesias, A.J.; Colón, C.; Alonso-Fernández, J.R.; Fraga, J.M. Evaluation and long-term follow-up of infants with inborn errors of metabolism identified in an expanded screening programme. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2011, 104, 470–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frazier, D.M.; Millington, D.S.; McCandless, S.E.; Koeberl, D.D.; Weavil, S.D.; Chaing, S.H.; Muenzer, J. The tandem mass spectrometry newborn screening experience in North Carolina: 1997–2005. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2006, 29, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feuchtbaum, L.; Yang, J.; Currier, R. Follow-up status during the first 5 years of life for metabolic disorders on the federal Recommended Uniform Screening Panel. Genet. Med. 2018, 20, 831–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mütze, U.; Garbade, S.F.; Gleich, F.; Lindner, M.; Freisinger, P.; Hennermann, J.B.; Thimm, E.; Gramer, G.; Posset, R.; Krämer, J.; et al. Long-term anthropometric development of individuals with inherited metabolic diseases identified by newborn screening. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2023, 46, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krude, H.; Kühnen, P.; Biebermann, H. Treatment of congenital thyroid dysfunction: Achievements and challenges. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 29, 399–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rose, S.R.; Wassner, A.J.; Wintergerst, K.A.; Yayah-Jones, N.-H.; Hopkin, R.J.; Chuang, J.; Smith, J.R.; Abell, K.; LaFranchi, S.H. Congenital Hypothyroidism: Screening and Management. Pediatrics 2023, 151, e2022060419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Trotsenburg, P.; Stoupa, A.; Léger, J.; Rohrer, T.R.; Peters, C.; Fugazzola, L.; Cassio, A.; Heinrichs, C.; Beauloye, V.; Pohlenz, J.; et al. Congenital Hypothyroidism: A 2020–2021 Consensus Guidelines Update-An ENDO-European Reference Network Initiative Endorsed by the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and the European Society for Endocrinology. Thyroid 2021, 31, 387–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nordenström, A.; Falhammar, H.; Lajic, S. Current and Novel Treatment Strategies in Children with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia. Horm. Res. Paediatr. 2023, 96, 560–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Speiser, P.W.; Arlt, W.; Auchus, R.J.; Baskin, L.S.; Conway, G.S.; Merke, D.P.; Meyer-Bahlburg, H.F.L.; Miller, W.L.; Murad, M.H.; Oberfield, S.E.; et al. Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Due to Steroid 21-Hydroxylase Deficiency: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 103, 4043–4088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schnabel-Besson, E.; Garbade, S.F.; Gleich, F.; Grünert, S.C.; Krämer, J.; Thimm, E.; Hennermann, J.B.; Freisinger, P.; Burgard, P.; Gramer, G.; et al. Parental and child’s psychosocial and financial burden living with an inherited metabolic disease identified by newborn screening. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2025, 48, e12784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cornel, M.C.; Rigter, T.; Jansen, M.E.; Henneman, L. Neonatal and carrier screening for rare diseases: How innovation challenges screening criteria worldwide. J. Community Genet. 2021, 12, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Outcome Category | Outcome Indicator | Reference Population |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | Height development until age 10 Height SDS until age 10 | KiGGS survey [33] |
| BMI | BMI categories at age 8 BMI SDS until age 10 | KiGGS survey [34,35] |
| Development | Preschool development: Developmental benchmarks [36] at age 6 | Bavarian school entry examination [37] |
| School career until age 14 | Bavarian State statistics [38] | |
| Behaviour | Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) [39,40] at age 8 | KiGGS survey [41,42] |
| Quality of Life | Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) at age 10 (KINDL-R instrument) [43,44] | KiGGS survey [45] |
| Condition | Cases | Prevalence | Recalls | Recall Rate | PPV | False-Negative/NBS Declined |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | n | % | % | n | ||
| Hypothyroidism | 899 6 | 1:3175 | 2100 | 0.07 | 42.33 | 6/3 |
| CAH | 217 7 | 1:13,153 | 11,881 | 0.42 | 1.73 | 12 |
| Biotinidase deficiency | 54 | 1:52,855 | 599 | 0.02 | 8.85 | 1 |
| Classic galactosemia | 44 | 1:64,868 | 1410 | 0.05 | 3.05 | 1 |
| PKU/mild HPA | 577 6 | 1:4947 | 1076 | 0.04 | 53.44 | 2 |
| MSUD | 12 | 1:237,849 | 62 | <0.01 | 17.74 | 1 |
| MCADD | 297 7 | 1:9610 | 441 | 0.02 | 67.35 | |
| LCHADD | 15 | 1:190,279 | 116 | <0.01 | 12.93 | 1 |
| VLCADD | 31 | 1:92,071 | 191 | 0.01 | 15.18 | 2 |
| Carnitine cycle defects 1 | 8 | 1:356,774 | 98 | <0.01 | 8.16 | |
| GA I | 24 | 1:118,925 | 176 | 0.01 | 12.50 | 2 |
| IVA | 25 | 1:114,168 | 491 | 0.02 | 5.09 | |
| Tyrosinemia type I 2 | 3 | 1:242,151 | 33 | 0.01 | 9.09 | |
| SCID 3 | 8 | 1:68,875 | 157 | 0.03 | 5.10 | |
| SCD 4 | 41 | 1:6516 | 77 | 0.03 | 53.25 | |
| SMA 4 | 33 | 1:8096 | 35 | 0.01 | 94.29 | |
| CF 5 | 214 | 1:4256 | 971 | 0.11 | 21.11 | 7/2 |
| Total | 2502 | 1:768 | 19,914 | 0.84 | 12.36 | 35/5 |
| Condition | ≤7 Days | 8–10 Days | 11–14 Days | >14 Days | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | |
| Hypothyroidism | 644 | 78.44 | 90 | 10.96 | 37 | 4.51 | 50 | 6.09 | 821 |
| CAH | 146 | 70.53 | 29 | 14.01 | 14 | 6.76 | 18 | 8.70 | 207 |
| PKU | 176 | 71.26 | 53 | 21.46 | 8 | 3.24 | 10 | 4.05 | 247 |
| HPA | 77 | 25.41 | 63 | 20.79 | 53 | 17.49 | 110 | 36.30 | 303 |
| MCADD | 150 | 53.20 | 62 | 21.80 | 29 | 10.20 | 42 | 14.84 | 283 |
| Further IEMs, SCID, SMA | 148 | 61.41 | 41 | 17.01 | 16 | 6.64 | 36 | 14.94 | 241 |
| Total | 1341 | 63.80 | 338 | 16.08 | 157 | 7.47 | 266 | 12.65 | 2102 |
| Condition | Individuals (n) |
|---|---|
| Hypothyroidism | 385 |
| CAH 1 | 106 |
| Biotinidase deficiency | 20 |
| Classic galactosemia | 20 |
| PKU | 144 |
| MSUD | 9 |
| MCADD | 164 |
| LCHADD | 5 |
| VLCADD | 15 |
| Carnitine cycle defects | 6 |
| GA I | 16 |
| IVA | 13 |
| Total | 903 |
| Condition | Individuals | Individuals with Metabolic or Electrolyte Decompensation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | n | Including | ||
| Neonatal (n) | Fatal (n) | |||
| CAH | 105 | 52 | 28 | |
| CAH and MCADD | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Biotinidase deficiency | 20 | |||
| Classic galactosemia | 20 | 9 | 9 | |
| MSUD | 9 | 4 | 1 | |
| MCADD | 164 | 11 | 3 | 2 |
| LCHADD | 5 | 5 | 2 | |
| VLCADD | 15 | 2 | 2 | |
| Carnitine cycle defects | 6 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
| GA I | 16 | 3 | ||
| IVA | 13 | 4 | ||
| Total | 374 | 95 | 45 | 7 |
| Condition | Individuals | Developmental Benchmarks Achieved at Age 6 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | n | % | CI 95% | |
| Hypothyroidism | 299 | 276 | 92.3 | 89.3–95.3 |
| CAH | 99 | 95 | 96.0 | 92.1–99.8 |
| PKU | 120 | 109 | 90.8 | 85.7–96.0 |
| MCADD | 149 | 138 | 92.6 | 88.4–96.8 |
| Further IEMs | 85 | 62 | 72.9 | 63.5–82.4 |
| Total | 752 | 680 | 90.4 | 88.3–92.5 |
| Reference population [37] | 1755 | 2002 | 87.7 | 86.2–89.1 |
| Outcome Category | Hypo-thyr. | CAH | PKU | MCADD | Further IEMs | Total | Figure/Table |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth | ✔ | ↓ | (↓) | ✔ | (↓) | ✔ | Figure 4, Suppl. Figure S1 |
| BMI | ✔ | ↑ | (↓) | ✔ | (↓) | (↑) | Figure 5, Suppl. Figure S2 |
| Development | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ↓ | ✔ | Table 6, Suppl. Figure S3 Suppl. Table S5 |
| Behaviour | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | Suppl. Figure S4 |
| Quality of Life | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Published by MDPI on behalf of the International Society for Neonatal Screening. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Nennstiel, U.; Brockow, I.; Odenwald, B.; Marzi, C.; Hanauer, M.; Maier, E.; Röschinger, W.; Fingerhut, R.; Liebl, B. A 25-Year Retrospective on Bavaria’s Newborn Screening Programme: Achievements, Challenges and Long-Term Follow-Up. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2025, 11, 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11040114
Nennstiel U, Brockow I, Odenwald B, Marzi C, Hanauer M, Maier E, Röschinger W, Fingerhut R, Liebl B. A 25-Year Retrospective on Bavaria’s Newborn Screening Programme: Achievements, Challenges and Long-Term Follow-Up. International Journal of Neonatal Screening. 2025; 11(4):114. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11040114
Chicago/Turabian StyleNennstiel, Uta, Inken Brockow, Birgit Odenwald, Carola Marzi, Marianne Hanauer, Esther Maier, Wulf Röschinger, Ralph Fingerhut, and Bernhard Liebl. 2025. "A 25-Year Retrospective on Bavaria’s Newborn Screening Programme: Achievements, Challenges and Long-Term Follow-Up" International Journal of Neonatal Screening 11, no. 4: 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11040114
APA StyleNennstiel, U., Brockow, I., Odenwald, B., Marzi, C., Hanauer, M., Maier, E., Röschinger, W., Fingerhut, R., & Liebl, B. (2025). A 25-Year Retrospective on Bavaria’s Newborn Screening Programme: Achievements, Challenges and Long-Term Follow-Up. International Journal of Neonatal Screening, 11(4), 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11040114

