Bio-Inspired Photocatalytic Degradation of Humic Acids over TiO2- and Ag-Doped TiO2-Functionalized Clinoptilolite: Mechanistic Insights into Nature-Mimicking Oxidation Pathways
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Preparation of Photocatalysts
2.2.1. Synthesis of TiO2 Nanoparticles (TiO2)
2.2.2. Synthesis of Ag-Doped TiO2 Nanoparticles (TiO2/Ag)
2.2.3. Functionalization of Clinoptilolite
2.3. Photocatalytic Experimental Setup
2.4. Analytical Methods
2.5. Morphological Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Photocatalytic Degradation over TiO2-Functionalized Clinoptilolite (C–TiO2)
3.2. Effect of Solution pH
3.3. Photocatalytic Degradation over Ag-Doped TiO2 (C–TiO2/Ag)
3.4. Kinetic Analysis and Mechanistic Implications
3.4.1. Photocatalytic Degradation Kinetics of Humic Substances over C–TiO2
3.4.2. Photocatalytic Degradation Kinetics of Humic Substances over C–TiO2/Ag
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wang, G.; Wang, J.; Yu, T.; Guo, X.; Chen, Y. Efficient Removal of Humic Acid in Water Using a Novel TiO2 Composite with Biochar Doping. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 31966–31975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Derakhshani, E.; Naghizadeh, A.; Arab-Zozani, M.; Farkhondeh, T. A Systematic Review of Photocatalytic Degradation of Humic Acid in Aqueous Solution Using Nanoparticles. Rev. Environ. Health 2022, 38, 577–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faadiyah, D.H.; Adnan, F.; Dewi, Y.P.; Zulya, F. Effect of UVC Based Photocatalyst on the Degradation of Humic Acid with Variations of pH and Variations of Concentration. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Tropical Studies and Its Applications (ICTROPS 2022); Atlantis Press: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pansamut, G.; Charinpanitkul, T.; Suriyawong, A. Removal of Humic Acid by Photocatalytic Process: Effect of Light Intensity. Eng. J. 2013, 17, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiszniowski, J.; Robert, D.; Surmacz-Górska, J.; Miksch, K.; Weber, J.V. Photocatalytic Decomposition of Humic Acids on TiO2. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2002, 152, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gowland, D.C.A.; Robertson, N.; Chatzisymeon, E. Photocatalytic Oxidation of Natural Organic Matter in Water. Water 2021, 13, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, G.; Liu, H.; Chen, Q.; Hills, C.; Tyrer, M.; Innocent, F. Synergy between surface adsorption and photocatalysis during degradation of humic acid on TiO2/activated carbon composites. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 765–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shirazian, S.; Alsaab, H.O.; Zare, M.H.; Yang, Q. Enhancing polysulfone membranes with UiO-66-NH2@TiO2 for humic acid removal in a PMR under visible light. npj Clean Water 2025, 8, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Selçuk, H.; Bekbolet, M. Photocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic humic acid removal and selectivity of TiO2-coated photoanode. Chemosphere 2008, 73, 854–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moein, H.; Nabi Bidhendi, G.; Mehrdadi, N.; Kamani, H. Efficiency of Photocatalytic Degradation of Humic Acid Using Magnetic Nanoparticles (Fe-doped TiO2@Fe3O4) in Aqueous Solutions. Health Scope 2020, 9, e102577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, Z.; Li, B.; Liu, G.; Lu, Z.; Chang, H.; Jin, J.; Jin, J.; Dai, W.; Qu, Y.; Qu, F. Enhanced degradation of humic acid by Co3O4/NCDs/PVDF photo-Fenton catalytic system. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2025, 198, 107125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birben, N.C.; Paganini, M.C.; Calza, P.; Bekbolet, M. Photocatalytic degradation of humic acid using a novel photocatalyst: Ce-doped ZnO. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2017, 16, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Y. Titanium dioxide-mediated photocatalytic degradation of humic acid under natural sunlight. Water Environ. Res. 2013, 85, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Dai, X.; Li, J.; Cheng, S.; Zhang, J.; Ma, Y. Recent progress in TiO2–biochar-based photocatalysts for water contaminants treatment: Strategies to improve photocatalytic performance. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 478–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Lim, H.-W.; Amal, R.; McEvoy, S. TiO2-coated natural zeolite: Rapid humic acid adsorption and effective photocatalytic regeneration. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2014, 105, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohtar, S.S.; Aziz, F.; Mohamad Nor, A.R.; Mukhtar Mohammed, A.; Ahmad Mhamad, S.; Jaafar, J.; Yusof, N.; Wan Salleh, W.N.W.; Ismail, A.F. Photocatalytic degradation of humic acid using a novel visible-light active α-Fe2O3/NiS2 composite photocatalyst. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mankad, N.P.; Ghosh, D. 8.30—Biomimetic Studies of the Mo/Cu Active Site of CO Dehydrogenase. In Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry III; Constable, E.C., Parkin, G., Que, L., Jr., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 772–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serrano-Plana, J.; Rumo, C.; Rebelein, J.G.; Peterson, R.L.; Barnet, M.; Ward, T.R. Enantioselective hydroxylation of benzylic C(sp3)–H bonds by an artificial iron hydroxylase based on the biotin–streptavidin technology. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 10617–10623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deeming, A.S.; Russell, C.J.; Willis, M.C. Combining Organometallic Reagents, the Sulfur Dioxide Surrogate DABSO, and Amines: A One-Pot Preparation of Sulfonamides, Amenable to Array Synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 1168–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lazau, C.; Răţiu, C.; Orha, C.; Pode, R.; Manea, F. Photocatalytic activity of undoped and Ag-doped TiO2-supported zeolite for humic acid degradation and mineralization. Mater. Res. Bull. 2011, 46, 1916–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, R.; Qin, S.; Lu, T.; Wang, S.; Chen, J.; He, Z. Engineering Photocatalytic Membrane Reactors for Sustainable Energy and Environmental Applications. Catalysts 2025, 15, 947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- APHA. Standard Method 5220 D: Closed Reflux, Colorimetric Method. In Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater; American Public Health Association (APHA): Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Rodríguez, F.J.; Schlenger, P.; García-Valverde, M. Monitoring changes in the structure and properties of humic substances following ozonation using UV–Vis, FTIR and 1H NMR techniques. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 541, 623–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, Y.-J.; Jeong, Y.J.; Cho, I.S.; Lee, C.-G.; Park, S.-J.; Alvarez, P.J.J. The inhibitory mechanism of humic acids on photocatalytic generation of reactive oxygen species by TiO2 depends on the crystalline phase. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 476, 146785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cozzolino, V.; Coppola, G.; Calabrò, V.; Chakraborty, S.; Candamano, S.; Algieri, C. Heterogeneous TiO2 photocatalysis coupled with membrane technology for persistent contaminant degradation: A critical review. Appl. Water Sci. 2025, 15, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zazouli, M.A.; Hashempour, Y.; Ala, A. Evaluation of the efficiency of the TiO2/UV nano-photocatalytic process in the removal of humic and fulvic acids from aqueous solutions. Environ. Health Eng. Manag. 2023, 10, 373–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zarzzeka, C.; Goldoni, J.; de Paula de Oliveira, J.R.; Gonçalves Lenzi, G.; Bagatini, M.D.; Colpini, L.M.S. Photocatalytic action of Ag/TiO2 nanoparticles to emerging pollutants degradation: A comprehensive review. Sustain. Chem. Environ. 2024, 8, 100177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, S.; Ye, L.; Tian, B.-J.; Li, J.-Y.; Zhang, A.-Y.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, C.; Jiang, C.; Lin, Z.-X.; Da, W.; et al. Humic substances mediated superior photochemical pollutant conversion on defective TiO2 in environmentally relevant matrices: The key roles of oxygen vacancy in surface interactions, oxidant activation and radical generation. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 921, 171145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Erhayem, M.; Sohn, M. Effect of humic acid source on humic acid adsorption onto titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 470–471, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirivallop, A.; Areerob, T.; Chiarakorn, S. Enhanced Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity of N and Ag Doped and Co-Doped TiO2 Synthesized by Using an In-Situ Solvothermal Method for Gas Phase Ammonia Removal. Catalysts 2020, 10, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Teo, S.H.; Shamsuddin, M.R.; Wid, N.; Wang, X. Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants and Microplastics Using Ag/TiO2: Recent Advances in Mechanism, Synthesis and Properties. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2025, 236, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abd El-Lateef, H.M.; Zeng, C.-Q.; Khalaf, M.M.; Mohamed, I.M.A. Green Synthesis of Silver-Incorporated Rutile TiO2 for Enhanced Photocatalytic Degradation of Ciprofloxacin and Carmine G Dye Pollutants. Catalysts 2024, 14, 904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pignatello, J.J.; Oliveros, E.; MacKay, A. Advanced oxidation processes for organic contaminant destruction based on the Fenton reaction and related chemistry. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 36, 1–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, H.D.; Nguyen, D.Q.; Do, P.T.; Tran, U.N.P. Kinetics of photocatalytic degradation of organic compounds: A mini-review and new approach. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 16915–16925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramos-Justicia, J.F.; Urbieta, A.; Fernández, P. Refined Langmuir–Hinshelwood kinetics for heterogeneous photocatalytic systems: Analytical closed-form solution, enhanced approximations and experimental validation. Physchem 2026, 6, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, D.; Cheng, Y.; Zhou, N.; Chen, P.; Wang, Y.; Li, K.; Huo, S.; Cheng, P.; Peng, P.; Zhang, R.; et al. Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants using TiO2-based photocatalysts: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 268, 121725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konstantinou, I.K.; Albanis, T.A. TiO2-assisted photocatalytic degradation of azo dyes in aqueous solution: Kinetic and mechanistic investigations. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2004, 49, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Mao, S.S. Titanium Dioxide Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties, Modifications, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2891–2959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schneider, J.; Matsuoka, M.; Takeuchi, M.; Zhang, J.; Horiuchi, Y.; Anpo, M.; Bahnemann, D.W. Understanding TiO2 Photocatalysis: Mechanisms and Materials. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 9919–9986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Xing, Y.; Li, R.; Zong, L.; Wang, X.; Yang, J. AgBr modified TiO2 nanotube films: Highly efficient photo-degradation of methyl orange under visible light irradiation. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 12636–12641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helms, J.R.; Stubbins, A.; Ritchie, J.D.; Minor, E.C.; Kieber, D.J.; Mopper, K. Absorption spectral slopes and slope ratios as indicators of molecular weight, source, and photobleaching of dissolved organic matter. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2008, 53, 955–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







| Characteristic | Value; % (by Weight) |
|---|---|
| Active substance | min. 80% clinoptilolite |
| Moisture | max. 6% |
| Particle size fractions | 0.25–1 mm |
| CEC (cation exchange capacity) | 2.6 meq/g |
| SiO2 | 67.42% |
| Al2O3 | 11.22% |
| Fe2O3 | 0.9% |
| CaO | 2.09% |
| MgO | 0.72% |
| K2O | 2.8% |
| TiO2 | 0.17% |
| Composition | Value; % (by Weight) |
|---|---|
| Appearance | Granules, dark brown color |
| Total humic extract | min. 65% |
| Humic acid | 60% |
| Fulvic acid | 5% |
| K2O (soluble) | 8% |
| Solution pH (1%) | 9 |
| Heavy metal content | Class A (below the limits set by standards) |
| Type of Photocatalytic Material | Acronym |
|---|---|
| Clinoptilolite functionalized with TiO2, 1 wt.% | C–TiO2 |
| Clinoptilolite functionalized with TiO2 and doped with silver ions | C–TiO2/Ag |
| Irradiation Time (min) | Degradation Efficiency (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| UV254 | VIS436 | COD | |
| 0 | - | - | - |
| 5 | 10.40 | 16.6 | 19.02 |
| 15 | 19.6 | 34.5 | 19.74 |
| 30 | 42.2 | 59.7 | 20.66 |
| 60 | 55.1 | 67.4 | 27.76 |
| 90 | 64.5 | 70.3 | 35.36 |
| 120 | 70.85 | 73.1 | 61.12 |
| pH | Irradiation Timp (min) | Degradation Efficiency (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UV254 | VIS436 | COD | ||
| 3 | 0 | - | - | - |
| 5 | 55.72 | 9.64 | 18.58 | |
| 15 | 60.48 | 37.80 | 45.33 | |
| 30 | 64.70 | 50.96 | 60.21 | |
| 60 | 67.70 | 66.03 | 64.83 | |
| 90 | 74.83 | 80.02 | 67.07 | |
| 120 | 79.45 | 85.92 | 75.78 | |
| 7 | 0 | |||
| 5 | 25.50 | 20.10 | 18.74 | |
| 15 | 32.90 | 36.12 | 29.74 | |
| 30 | 49.71 | 47.39 | 52.68 | |
| 60 | 61.80 | 54.21 | 57.19 | |
| 90 | 63.62 | 61.62 | 60.59 | |
| 120 | 70.60 | 70.13 | 64.69 | |
| 10 | 0 | |||
| 5 | 15.12 | 7.89 | 2.28 | |
| 15 | 21.20 | 23.60 | 22.20 | |
| 30 | 47.46 | 45.71 | 43.79 | |
| 60 | 63.65 | 48.24 | 48.19 | |
| 90 | 64.47 | 49.68 | 52.12 | |
| 120 | 66.77 | 63.01 | 59.01 | |
| Irradiation Time (min) | Degradation Efficiency (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| UV254 | VIS436 | COD | |
| 0 | - | - | - |
| 5 | 47.20 | 53.07 | 15.63 |
| 15 | 49.95 | 51.35 | 32.48 |
| 30 | 56.70 | 59.34 | 46.50 |
| 60 | 66.17 | 65.92 | 51.76 |
| 90 | 72.10 | 74.17 | 60.06 |
| 120 | 85.69 | 90.30 | 74.40 |
| Photocatalyst | Pollutant | k (min−1) | t1/2 (min) | Conditions | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C–TiO2 | Humic acid | 0.0063–0.0188 | 36.8–110 | UV-C | This work |
| TiO2/clinoptilolite | Methylene blue | 0.006–0.014 | 50–116 | UV | [36] |
| TiO2/zeolite | Phenol | 0.004–0.011 | 63–173 | UV-A | [37] |
| TiO2/zeolite | Organic pollutants (general) | 0.003–0.015 | 46–231 | UV | [38] |
| TiO2/zeolite composites | Azo dyes | 0.005–0.012 | 58–138 | UV | [39] |
| C–TiO2/Ag | Humic acid | 0.0084–0.0190 | 36.5–82.5 | UV-A | This work |
| AgBr–TiO2 | Methyl orange | 0.012 | 57.8 | UV | [40] |
| Ag–TiO2 | Rhodamine B | 0.018 | 38.5 | UV-A | [30] |
| Ag–TiO2 | Phenol | 0.009 | 77.0 | UV | [39] |
| Ag–TiO2 | Methylene blue | 0.021 | 33.0 | UV | [38] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Bobirică, L.; Modrogan, C.; Bobirică, C.; Orbuleţ, O.D. Bio-Inspired Photocatalytic Degradation of Humic Acids over TiO2- and Ag-Doped TiO2-Functionalized Clinoptilolite: Mechanistic Insights into Nature-Mimicking Oxidation Pathways. Biomimetics 2026, 11, 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics11060388
Bobirică L, Modrogan C, Bobirică C, Orbuleţ OD. Bio-Inspired Photocatalytic Degradation of Humic Acids over TiO2- and Ag-Doped TiO2-Functionalized Clinoptilolite: Mechanistic Insights into Nature-Mimicking Oxidation Pathways. Biomimetics. 2026; 11(6):388. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics11060388
Chicago/Turabian StyleBobirică, Liliana, Cristina Modrogan, Constantin Bobirică, and Oanamari Daniela Orbuleţ. 2026. "Bio-Inspired Photocatalytic Degradation of Humic Acids over TiO2- and Ag-Doped TiO2-Functionalized Clinoptilolite: Mechanistic Insights into Nature-Mimicking Oxidation Pathways" Biomimetics 11, no. 6: 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics11060388
APA StyleBobirică, L., Modrogan, C., Bobirică, C., & Orbuleţ, O. D. (2026). Bio-Inspired Photocatalytic Degradation of Humic Acids over TiO2- and Ag-Doped TiO2-Functionalized Clinoptilolite: Mechanistic Insights into Nature-Mimicking Oxidation Pathways. Biomimetics, 11(6), 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics11060388

