The Power of the Pregnant Body: Perspectives of Agency and Autonomy in Pregnancy
Abstract
:1. Introduction
I’ve really started toying with the idea of “using it” to my advantage … There’s opportunity here to re-shape so many other aspects of my life using pregnancy as my way of becoming visible in a way I wasn’t before. I almost feel as though there might be a bit of fear—but not over me. Over the pregnancy—what if the baby is hurt?! The combined mother+baby is more powerful than just woman alone.Diary entry, participant 6, 9 April 2019
2. The Pregnant Body as Foetal Containment
2.1. Conceptualising a Child
2.2. Visualising a Child
3. The Pregnant Body as Illness
4. The Power of the Pregnant Body
5. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bertin, Joan. 1995. Regulating reproduction. In Reproduction, Ethics and the Law: Feminist Responses. Edited by Callahan Joan. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 380–97. [Google Scholar]
- Bordo, Susan. 1993. Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. Berkeley: University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
- Brubaker, Sarah Jane. 2007. Denied, Embracing, and Resisting Medicalization: African American Teen Mothers’ Perceptions of Formal Pregnancy and Childbirth Care. Gender and Society 21: 528–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butler, Sara. 2005. Abortion by Assault: Violence Against Pregnant Women in Thirteenth- and Fourteenth Century England. Journal of Women’s History 17: 9–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chambers, Deborah. 2009. The Flaunting of Fertility: Popular Media Representations of the Maternal. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle University. [Google Scholar]
- Clark, Adele. 1995. Modernity, Postmodernity and Reproductive Processes, ca. 1980–90. In The Cyborg Handbook. Edited by Gray Chris. London: Routledge, pp. 139–56. [Google Scholar]
- Duden, Barbara. 1993. Disembodying Women: Perspectives on Pregnancy and the Unborn. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Earle, Sarah, and Gayle Letherby. 2003. Gender, Identity and Reproduction. London: Palgrave McMillan. [Google Scholar]
- Gelis, Jacques. 1991. History of Childbirth: Fertility, Pregnancy and Birth in Early Modern Europe. Boston: Northeastern University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Ghosh, Durba. 2010. Legal and Liberal Subjects: Women’s Crimes in Early Colonial India. Journal of Women’s History 22: 153–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartouni, Valerie. 1997. Cultural Conceptions: On Reproductive Technologies and the Remaking of Life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar]
- Hayward, Maria. 2007. Dress at the Court of King Henry VIII. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Hearn, Karen. 2020. Portraying Pregnancy: From Holbein to Social Media. London: Paul Holberton Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Jansen, Willy. 2000. Sleeping in the Womb: Protracted Pregnancies in the Maghreb. The Muslim World 90: 218–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, Sophia. 2014. “Maternal Devices”, Social Media and the Self-Management of Pregnancy, Mothering and Child Health. Societies 4: 330–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Katz Rothman, Barbara. 1993. The Tentative Pregnancy: How Amniocentesis Changes the Experience of Motherhood. New York: Norton and Company. [Google Scholar]
- Kristeva, Julia. 1981. Women’s time. Signs 7: 13–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laqueur, Thomas. 1992. Making Sex. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Longhurst, Robyn. 2005. (Ad)dressing Pregnant Bodies in New Zealand: Clothing, Fashion, Subjectivities and Spatialities. Gender Place and Culture 12: 433–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, Aryn. 2010. Microchimerism in the Mother(land): Blurring the Borders of Body and Nation. Body and Society 16: 23–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morell, Carolyn. 2000. Saying No: Women’s Experiences with Reproductive Refusal. Feminism and Psychology 10: 313–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nash, Meredith. 2013. Making ‘Postmodern’ Mothers: Pregnant Embodiment, Baby Bumps and Body Image. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
- Nettleton, Sarah. 1997. Governing the Risky Self: How to Become Healthy Wealthy and Wise. In Foucault, Health and Medicine. Edited by Bunton Robin and Petersen Alan. London: Routledge, pp. 207–22. [Google Scholar]
- Newman, Karen. 1996. Fetal Positions: Individualism, Science, Individuality. Standford: Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Oakley, Ann. 1984. The Captured Womb: A History of Medical Care of Pregnant Women. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
- Oakley, Ann. 2007. Fracture: Adventures of a Broken Body. Bristol: Policy Press. [Google Scholar]
- Petchesky, Rosalind. 1984. Abortion and Women’s Choice: The State, Sexuality and Reproductive Freedom. New York: Longman. [Google Scholar]
- Pollitt, Katha. 1990. Fetal Rights, Women’s Wrongs. In Reasonable Creatures: Essays on Women and Feminism. New York: Vintage Books, pp. 169–86. [Google Scholar]
- Pollitt, Katha. 1998. “Fetal rights”: A New Assault on Feminism. In The Politics of Women’s Bodies: Sexuality, Appearance and Behavior. Edited by Weitz Rose and Kwan Samantha. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 278–87. [Google Scholar]
- Raphael-Leff, Joan. 1991. Pregnancy: The Inside Story. London: Karnac Books. [Google Scholar]
- Root, Robin, and Carole Browner. 2013. Practices of the Pregnant Self: Compliance with and Resistance to Prenatal Norms. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 25: 196–223. [Google Scholar]
- Rublack, Ulinka. 1996. Pregnancy, Childbirth and the Female Body in Early Modern Germany. The Past and Present Society 150: 84–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruhl, P. Lealle. 2002. Disarticulating Liberal Subjectivities: Abortion and Fetal Protection. Feminist Studies 28: 37–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmied, Virginia, and Deborah Lupton. 2001. The Externality of the Inside: Body Images of Pregnancy. Nursing Inquiry 8: 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shaw, Jennifer. 2012. The Birth of the Clinic and the Advent of Reproduction: Pregnancy, Pathology and the Medical Gaze in Modernity. Body & Society 18: 110–38. [Google Scholar]
- Shrage, Laurie. 2002. From Reproductive Rights to Reproductive Barbie: Post-Porn Modernism and Abortion. Feminist Studies 28: 61–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stabile, Carole. 1994. Feminism and the Technological Fix. Manchester: Manchester University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Wager, Maaret. 2000. Childless by Choice? Ambivalence and the Female Identity. Feminism and Psychology 10: 389–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Warren, Samantha, and Joanna Brewis. 2004. Matter over Mind? Examining the Experience of Pregnancy. Sociology 25: 373–92. [Google Scholar]
- Wengraf, Tom. 2004. The Biographic-Narrative Interpretive Method—Shortguide. NCRM Working Paper. Available online: http://doras.dcu.ie/20033/2/BNIM_paper_for_DORAS.pdf (accessed on 30 January 2021).
- Withycombe, Shannon. 2015. Unusual Frontal Developments: Negotiating the Pregnant Body in Nineteenth-Century America. Journal of Women’s History 27: 160–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Withycombe, Shannon. 2018a. Meanings and Materials of Miscarriage: How Babies in Jars Shaped Modern Pregnancy. Nursing Clio. Available online: https://nursingclio.org/2018/10/31/meanings-and-materials-of-miscarriage/ (accessed on 11 August 2020).
- Withycombe, Shannon. 2018b. Lost: Miscarriage in Nineteenth-Century America. New Brunkswick: Rutgers University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Young, Iris Marion. 1984. Pregnant Embodiment: Subjectivity and Alienation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9: 45–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Young, Iris Marion. 1990. On the Female Experience “Throwing Like a Girl” and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Haaker, M. The Power of the Pregnant Body: Perspectives of Agency and Autonomy in Pregnancy. Genealogy 2021, 5, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy5010013
Haaker M. The Power of the Pregnant Body: Perspectives of Agency and Autonomy in Pregnancy. Genealogy. 2021; 5(1):13. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy5010013
Chicago/Turabian StyleHaaker, Maureen. 2021. "The Power of the Pregnant Body: Perspectives of Agency and Autonomy in Pregnancy" Genealogy 5, no. 1: 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy5010013
APA StyleHaaker, M. (2021). The Power of the Pregnant Body: Perspectives of Agency and Autonomy in Pregnancy. Genealogy, 5(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy5010013