Next Article in Journal
Immunological Methods in Gluten Risk Analysis: A Snapshot
Previous Article in Journal
Perceived Safety Benefits of Aftermarket Driver Support Systems: Results from a Large Scale European Field Operational Test (FOT)
Article Menu
Issue 4 (December) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Safety 2018, 4(4), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/safety4040055

Measuring Industrial Health Using a Diminished Quality of Life Instrument

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8140, Canterbury, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 15 October 2018 / Revised: 20 November 2018 / Accepted: 23 November 2018 / Published: 27 November 2018
  |  
PDF [5041 KB, uploaded 28 November 2018]
  |     |  

Abstract

Historically, the focus of industrial health and safety (H&S) has been on safety and accident avoidance with relatively less attention to long-term occupational health other than via health monitoring and surveillance. The difficulty is the multiple overlapping health consequences that are difficult to separate, measure, and attribute to a source. Furthermore, many health problems occur later, not immediately on exposure, and may be cumulative. Consequently, it is difficult to conclusively identify the cause. Workers may lack knowledge of long-term consequences, and thus not use protective systems effectively. Compounding this is the lack of instruments and methodologies to measure exposure to harm. Historically, the existing risk methodologies for calculating safety risk are based on the construct of consequence and likelihood. However, this may not be appropriate for health, especially for the long-term harm, as both the consequence and likelihood may be indeterminate. This paper develops an instrument to measure the health component of workplace H&S. This is achieved by adapting the established World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) quality of life score to workplace health. Specifically, the method is to identify the likelihood of an exposure incident arising (as estimated by engineering technologists and H&S officers), followed by evaluation of the biological harm consequences. Those consequences are then scored by using the WHODAS 12-item inventory. The result is an assessment of the Diminished Quality of Life (DQL) associated with a workplace hazard. This may then be used to manage the minimization of harm, exposure monitoring, and the design of safe systems of work. View Full-Text
Keywords: Manufacturing industry; health and safety; measuring instrument; diminished quality of life; biological consequences; occupational health Manufacturing industry; health and safety; measuring instrument; diminished quality of life; biological consequences; occupational health
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Ji, Z.; Pons, D.; Pearse, J. Measuring Industrial Health Using a Diminished Quality of Life Instrument. Safety 2018, 4, 55.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Safety EISSN 2313-576X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top