Next Article in Journal
Pilot Testing a Naturalistic Driving Study to Investigate Winter Maintenance Operator Fatigue during Winter Emergencies
Previous Article in Journal
Implications of Articulating Machinery on Operator Line of Sight and Efficacy of Camera Based Proximity Detection Systems
Article Menu
Issue 3 (September) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Safety 2017, 3(3), 18;

Postural Control in Workplace Safety: Role of Occupational Footwear and Workload

Neuromechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
Department of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, Troy University, Troy, AL 36082, USA
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Raphael Grzebieta
Received: 11 July 2017 / Revised: 26 July 2017 / Accepted: 27 July 2017 / Published: 1 August 2017
PDF [1330 KB, uploaded 1 August 2017]


Maintaining postural stability is crucial, especially in hazardous occupational environments. The purpose of the study was to assess the role of three occupational footwear (low top shoe (LT); tactical work boot (TB) and steel-toed work boot (WB)) on postural stability when exposed to an occupational workload (4-h) involving standing/walking using the sensory organization test (SOT) equilibrium (EQ) scores and comparing current results with previously published postural sway variables from the same study. Fourteen male adults were tested on three separate days wearing a randomized occupational footwear, at the beginning (pre) and every 30 min of the 4-h workload until 240th min. SOT EQ scores were analyzed using a 3 × 9 repeated measures analysis of variance at an alpha level of 0.05. Significant differences between footwear was found in eyes open (p = 0.03) and eyes closed (p = 0.001) conditions. Pairwise comparisons revealed that LT had significantly lower postural stability compared to TB and WB. No other significant differences were found between footwear and over time. Significant differences between footwear can be attributed to design characteristics of footwear. Lack of significant differences over time suggests that, even though the average EQ scores decreased during the workload implying less postural stability, SOT EQ scores alone may not be sufficient to detect postural stability changes over the 4-h workload. View Full-Text
Keywords: postural stability; balance; occupational footwear; workload; sensory organization test (SOT) postural stability; balance; occupational footwear; workload; sensory organization test (SOT)

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Chander, H.; Garner, J.C.; Wade, C.; Knight, A.C. Postural Control in Workplace Safety: Role of Occupational Footwear and Workload. Safety 2017, 3, 18.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Safety EISSN 2313-576X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top