This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessReview
Review: Techniques in Egocentric Multi-View Image Analysis: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions
by
Duc Tri Phan
Duc Tri Phan 1
and
Hong Duc Nguyen
Hong Duc Nguyen 2,*
1
Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, 254 Nguyen Van Linh, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
2
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Imaging 2026, 12(7), 324; https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging12070324 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 10 June 2026
/
Revised: 9 July 2026
/
Accepted: 13 July 2026
/
Published: 17 July 2026
Abstract
Egocentric multi-view image analysis refers to the processing of utilizing synchronized video streams captured from multiple wearable cameras worn on the head or body, providing complementary first-person perspectives of dynamic, real-world interactions. Unlike single-view egocentric vision, which may suffer from severe occlusions, motion blur, and limited field-of-view or traditional fixed-camera multi-view setups (assuming static geometry and controlled environments), egocentric multi-view systems leverage body-worn rigs to enable a more robust and flexible 3D understanding in open-world, mobile scenarios. In this work, we present a systematic survey of advancements in cross-view feature fusion, geometric consistency enforcement, open-world detection, human–object interaction (HOI) modeling, action segmentation, 3D reconstruction, and novel-view synthesis specifically tailored to wearable multi-camera platforms. Key datasets released between 2024 and 2026—including HOT3D (833 min of synchronized multi-view hand/object interactions from Project Aria and Quest 3), MultiEgo (first multi-egocentric dataset for 4D social scene reconstruction), and Ego-1K (large-scale 12-camera rig for dynamic 3D video synthesis) are thoroughly examined alongside an analysis of integrations with large language models (LLMs) and vision–language models that drive performance gains, typically in the 15–30% range over single-view baselines in hand tracking, HOI recognition, and reconstruction fidelity, although we show through a consolidated meta-analysis that this gain is task-dependent: larger for geometry-bottlenecked tasks such as in-hand object lifting, and smaller, method-dependent, or occasionally negative for semantic-recognition tasks such as keystep recognition under naive view fusion. These methods cover work in multi-view stereo, cross-view learning, and novel-view synthesis while addressing several real-time wearable constraints. Practical applications such as immersive Augmented Reality/Virtual Reality (AR/VR), assistive robotics, and healthcare monitoring are also discussed together with the challenges in motion calibration, benchmark diversity, and edge deployment ability. Thus, in this review, we attempt to fill a critical gap by focusing exclusively on wearable multi-view systems in an open-world setting, synthesizing the latest literature to chart future directions toward more embodied and continual learning agents.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Phan, D.T.; Nguyen, H.D.
Review: Techniques in Egocentric Multi-View Image Analysis: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions. J. Imaging 2026, 12, 324.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging12070324
AMA Style
Phan DT, Nguyen HD.
Review: Techniques in Egocentric Multi-View Image Analysis: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions. Journal of Imaging. 2026; 12(7):324.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging12070324
Chicago/Turabian Style
Phan, Duc Tri, and Hong Duc Nguyen.
2026. "Review: Techniques in Egocentric Multi-View Image Analysis: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions" Journal of Imaging 12, no. 7: 324.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging12070324
APA Style
Phan, D. T., & Nguyen, H. D.
(2026). Review: Techniques in Egocentric Multi-View Image Analysis: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions. Journal of Imaging, 12(7), 324.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging12070324
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.