This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessReview
Artificial Intelligence in Pulmonary Endoscopy: Current Evidence, Limitations, and Future Directions
by
Sara Lopes
Sara Lopes 1,*,†
,
Miguel Mascarenhas
Miguel Mascarenhas 2,3,4,*,†
,
João Fonseca
João Fonseca 2,3,4
and
Adelino F. Leite-Moreira
Adelino F. Leite-Moreira 2,5
1
Thoracic Surgery, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
2
Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-437 Porto, Portugal
3
Precision Medicine Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital São João, 4200-437 Porto, Portugal
4
World Gastroenterology Organisation Training Center, 4200-437 Porto, Portugal
5
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hospital São João, 4200-437 Porto, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Imaging 2026, 12(4), 167; https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging12040167 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 28 February 2026
/
Revised: 8 April 2026
/
Accepted: 10 April 2026
/
Published: 12 April 2026
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied in pulmonary endoscopy, including diagnostic bronchoscopy, interventional pulmonology and endobronchial imaging. Advances in computer vision, machine learning and robotic systems have expanded the potential for automated lesion detection, navigation to peripheral pulmonary lesions, and real-time procedural support. However, the current evidence base remains heterogeneous, and translational challenges persist. Methods: This review summarizes current applications and developments of AI across white-light bronchoscopy (WLB), image-enhanced bronchoscopy (e.g., narrow-band imaging and autofluorescence imaging), endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS), virtual and robotic bronchoscopies, and workflow optimization and training. The authors also examine the methodological limitations, regulatory considerations, and implementation barriers that affect translation into routine practice. Results: Reported developments include deep learning-based models for mucosal abnormality detection, lymph-node characterization during EBUS-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), improved lesion localization, and reduction in operator-dependent variability. Additionally, AI-assisted simulation platforms and decision-support tools are reshaping training paradigms. Nevertheless, most studies remain retrospective or single-center, with limited external validation, dataset heterogeneity, unclear model explainability, and incomplete integration into clinical workflows. Conclusions: AI has the potential to support lesion detection, navigation, and training in pulmonary endoscopy. However, robust prospective validation, standardized datasets, transparent model reporting, robust data governance, multidisciplinary collaboration, and careful integration into clinical practice are required before widespread adoption.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Lopes, S.; Mascarenhas, M.; Fonseca, J.; Leite-Moreira, A.F.
Artificial Intelligence in Pulmonary Endoscopy: Current Evidence, Limitations, and Future Directions. J. Imaging 2026, 12, 167.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging12040167
AMA Style
Lopes S, Mascarenhas M, Fonseca J, Leite-Moreira AF.
Artificial Intelligence in Pulmonary Endoscopy: Current Evidence, Limitations, and Future Directions. Journal of Imaging. 2026; 12(4):167.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging12040167
Chicago/Turabian Style
Lopes, Sara, Miguel Mascarenhas, João Fonseca, and Adelino F. Leite-Moreira.
2026. "Artificial Intelligence in Pulmonary Endoscopy: Current Evidence, Limitations, and Future Directions" Journal of Imaging 12, no. 4: 167.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging12040167
APA Style
Lopes, S., Mascarenhas, M., Fonseca, J., & Leite-Moreira, A. F.
(2026). Artificial Intelligence in Pulmonary Endoscopy: Current Evidence, Limitations, and Future Directions. Journal of Imaging, 12(4), 167.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging12040167
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.