Production of Direct Reduction Grade Iron Concentrate from Pickling Sludge by Reduction Calcination and Magnetic Separation
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Gasification Reduction Calcination
2.1.1. Calcination Temperature
2.1.2. Calcination Time
2.1.3. Reductant Agent
2.1.4. Material Thickness
2.1.5. Cooling Method for Roasted Ore
2.2. Roasted Ore Grinding Magnetic Separation Test
2.3. Study of Calcination Reaction Mechanism
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Materials
3.2. Methods
4. Conclusions
- (1)
- The primary valuable elements in the pickling sludge are iron and chlorine. The experimental results demonstrate that the pickling sludge can be efficiently recycled and utilized through the reduction roasting–magnetic separation process. During the reduction roasting process, calcination temperature, reducing agent dosage, and calcination time significantly influence the reduction performance, while the grinding fineness of the roasted ore is also a critical factor affecting the grade of the iron concentrate.
- (2)
- Using a reduction calcination–grinding–magnetic separation–spent acid recovery process, with a calcination temperature of 1100 °C, a reducing agent dosage of 15%, and a calcination time of 2 h, the chlorine volatilization rate reaches over 97%. When the roasted ore is ground to a particle size distribution where 85% of the particles are −0.076 mm, magnetic separation yields iron concentrate with a grade of over 69.50%, meeting the quality requirements for direct reduction-grade iron concentrate.
- (3)
- The key to gasification-reduction calcination lies in maintaining a stable reaction atmosphere within the furnace. This process must ensure that Fe2O3 is reduced to magnetite and retained in the slag phase to produce high-quality iron concentrate, while also taking into account the volatilization and recovery of chlorine. The iron tailings obtained after magnetic separation can be utilized in building materials such as cement and bricks, thereby achieving the safe treatment and disposal of pickling sludge.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wu, L.; Hao, Y.; Yue, C.; Hu, T. Resource utilization technologies and their selection of mud containing iron from iron and steel enterprises. Environ. Eng. 2016, 34, 113–117. [Google Scholar]
- Li, H.; Du, G.; Du, J.; Shi, X. Steel industry solid waste comprehensive utilization industry development status and trends. China Steel Focus 2021, 1, 116–117. [Google Scholar]
- Gu, B.; Peng, C.; Wang, N.; Gao, J.; Long, H.; Chun, T. Current status and prospect of resourceful disposal of stainless steel pickling sludge. J. Iron Steel Res. 2024, 36, 975–990. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Li, S.; Zhao, Z. Controlling magnetic agglomeration in superconducting high gradient magnetic separation processing of iron ore tailings for high-grade silica recovery. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2025, 35, 1627–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tang, S.; Liu, G. Comprehensive utilization of waste acid regeneration filter cake in cold rolling pickling process of Masteel. J. Anhui Vocat. Coll. Metall. Technol. 2013, 23, 28–31. [Google Scholar]
- Feng, X.; Zhao, Z.; Yu, J.; Zhang, Y. A mass-energy coupling treatment process for stainless steel pickling sludge using high-temperature argon-oxygen decarburization (AOD) slag. Environ. Eng. 2025, 43, 10–17. [Google Scholar]
- Tang, Z.; Liu, G.; Zhong, L. Influence of stainless steel pickling sludge on mass of oxidized pellets. Sinter. Pelletizing 2024, 49, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, X.; Ren, C. Technical summary of pickling sludge drying and pelletizing production line. Energy Conserv. Environ. Prot. 2022, 5, 88–89. [Google Scholar]
- Lv, Z.; Chen, Q. Research and analysis of domestic and foreign solid waste resource utilization and evaluation methods. Resour. Recycl. 2021, 10, 40–42. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, P.; Lindblom, B.; Björkman, B. Experimental studies on solid-state reduction of pickling sludge generated in the stainless steel production. Scand. J. Met. 2005, 34, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tang, Z.; Ding, X.; Yan, X.; Dong, Y.; Liu, C. Recovery of iron, chromium, and nickel from pickling sludge using smelting reduction. Metals 2018, 8, 936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, X.M.; Xie, G.; Hojamberdiev, M.; Cui, Y.R.; Zhao, J.X. Characterization and recycling of nickel-and chromium-contained pickling sludge generated in production of stainless steel. J. Cent. South Univ. 2014, 21, 3241–3246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, S.; Jiang, X.; Lv, G.; Wu, L.; Li, W.; Wang, Y.; Fang, C.; Jin, Y.; Yan, J. Co-combustion of Shenmu coal and pickling sludge in a pilot scale drop-tube furnace: Pollutants emissions in flue gas and fly ash. Fuel Process. Technol. 2019, 184, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, X.; Wang, J.; Lv, M.; Yin, W.; Cui, Y.; Zhao, J. Experiment on stainless steel pickling sludge used as steelmaking slagging flux. Iron Steel 2019, 54, 96–101. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, M.T.; Li, Y.L.; Guo, Q.; Shao, D.W.; He, M.M.; Qi, T. Harmless treatment and resource utilization of stainless steel pickling sludge via direct reduction and magnetic separation. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 240, 118187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, X.; Yin, W.; Shen, M.; Zhou, C.; Cui, Y.; Zhao, J. Desulfurization dynamics on reduction pre-treatment of sludge from pickling of chromium nickel stainless steel. Iron Steel 2018, 53, 83–90. [Google Scholar]
- Fu, P.; Li, Z.; Feng, J.; Bian, Z. Recovery of gold and iron from cyanide tailings with a combined direct reduction roasting and leaching process. Metals 2018, 8, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shi, L.; Chen, R.; Wang, R. Study on metallurgical properties and pellet proportioning technology of stainless steel cold-rolling sludge. Baosteel Technol. 2013, 2, 23–27. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, X.; Gu, B.; Su, P.; Wang, N.; Gao, J.; Zhang, S.; Deng, X.; Chun, T. Utilization of stainless steel pickling sludge using the blast furnace molten slag. Iron Steel 2024, 59, 185–193. [Google Scholar]
- Taimullah, A.; Islam, I.; Tandersen, D.; Nizhamul, U.A.; Hidayat, T.; Makhambetov, Y.; Hendrawan, Y.; Zulhan, Z. Direct and sustainable stainless steelmaking from nickel and chromite ores by hydrogen plasma smelting reduction. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2025, 32, 1881–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sarkar, A.; Schanche, T.L.; Wallin, M.; Safarian, J. Kinetics study on the H2 reduction of Nchwaning manganese ore at elevated temperatures. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2025, 32, 1091–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, J.; Sun, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, Q. Recovery of metals from stainless steel pickling sludge by reduction and magnetic separation. Chin. J. Process Eng. 2014, 14, 782–786. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, Q.; Zuo, W. The Development and countermeasures for the resource reuse of pickling sludge by smelting enterprises. Pollut. Control Technol. 2017, 30, 20–22+28. [Google Scholar]
- Yoshikawa, N.; Mashiko, K.I.; Sasaki, Y.; Taniguchi, S.; Todoroki, H. Microwave carbo-thermal reduction for recycling of Cr from Cr-containing steel making wastes. ISIJ Int. 2008, 48, 690–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhu, X.; Sun, Y.; Han, Y.; Li, Y.; Lu, Z. Effect of cooling mode on magnetic properties of cooling product. Met. Mine 2019, 2, 66–70. [Google Scholar]
- GB/T 212-2008; Proximate Analysis of Coal. China Standard Press: Beijing, China, 2008.
- GB/T 214-2007; Determination of Total Sulfur in Coal. China Standard Press: Beijing, China, 2007.











| Cooling Method | Product | Yield (%) | Grade (%) | Fe Distribution Rate (%) | Cl Volatilization Rate (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe | Cl | |||||
| Furnace cooling | Iron concentrate | 64.87 | 68.98 | 0.37 | 96.27 | 1.88 |
| Tailings | 13.52 | 12.82 | 0.51 | 3.73 | 0.54 | |
| Volatile matter | 21.61 | / | 57.61 | / | 97.58 | |
| Feed | 100.00 | 46.48 | 12.76 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |
| Water quenching cooling | Iron concentrate | 65.11 | 69.52 | 0.38 | 96.75 | 1.93 |
| Tailings | 13.45 | 11.30 | 0.52 | 3.25 | 0.55 | |
| Volatile matter | 21.44 | / | 58.23 | / | 97.52 | |
| Feed | 100.00 | 46.78 | 12.80 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |
| Component | Fe | SiO2 | Al2O3 | CaO | MgO | Cl | P | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content | 46.50 | 1.27 | 0.64 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 12.70 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Fixed Carbon | Ash Content | Volatile Matter | Moisture Content | S | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80.22 | 11.56 | 7.78 | 0.25 | 0.01 | 0.002 |
| Component | SiO2 | Al2O3 | CaO | MgO | Fe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content | 43.13 | 19.55 | 18.46 | 1.31 | 4.42 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Gao, C.; Yang, H.; Xu, J.; Wang, N. Production of Direct Reduction Grade Iron Concentrate from Pickling Sludge by Reduction Calcination and Magnetic Separation. Recycling 2026, 11, 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling11080145
Gao C, Yang H, Xu J, Wang N. Production of Direct Reduction Grade Iron Concentrate from Pickling Sludge by Reduction Calcination and Magnetic Separation. Recycling. 2026; 11(8):145. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling11080145
Chicago/Turabian StyleGao, Chunqing, Huifen Yang, Jian Xu, and Ning Wang. 2026. "Production of Direct Reduction Grade Iron Concentrate from Pickling Sludge by Reduction Calcination and Magnetic Separation" Recycling 11, no. 8: 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling11080145
APA StyleGao, C., Yang, H., Xu, J., & Wang, N. (2026). Production of Direct Reduction Grade Iron Concentrate from Pickling Sludge by Reduction Calcination and Magnetic Separation. Recycling, 11(8), 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling11080145

