Next Article in Journal
Exploring the E-Waste Crisis: Strategies for Sustainable Recycling and Circular Economy Integration
Next Article in Special Issue
Rebound Effect Generated by Waste HDPE in Hot Asphalt Mixtures
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Pollution Mitigation: The Chemical Transformation of Residual Frying Oil into Biodiesel
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rutting and Aging Properties of Recycled Polymer-Modified Pavement Materials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Quality Assurance Framework for Recovered Binders and Aggregates from Asphalt Mixtures Incorporating Recycled Materials

by
Eslam Deef-Allah
1,2 and
Magdy Abdelrahman
1,*
1
Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA
2
Department of Construction Engineering and Utilities, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Recycling 2025, 10(2), 71; https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10020071
Submission received: 6 March 2025 / Revised: 8 April 2025 / Accepted: 11 April 2025 / Published: 13 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recycled Materials in Sustainable Pavement Innovation)

Abstract

This study proposes that a proactive quality assurance (QA) framework for asphalt mixes with recycled materials, i.e., reclaimed asphalt pavement and recycled asphalt shingles, should be developed. Quality control (QC) is generally concerned with the contractor’s obligation to produce mixes which meet the job mix formula (JMF) targets. However, QA considers the variability in fabrication processes and materials and offers monitoring by evaluating the contractor’s performance. Although both aggregate gradations and asphalt contents were within the JMF specifications, the recovered binders revealed significant differences from the contract binders in the JMF. Rheological tests indicated increased stiffness and elasticity but reduced capability to relax thermal stresses in binders recovered from plant–lab- and lab-fabricated mixtures, compared to field mixtures. Thermal-rheological analysis models corroborated these results by demonstrating reduced decomposition areas for more aged binders, enhancing performance prediction—especially for limited binder amounts. The creation of a QA decision matrix facilitated uniform, performance-oriented assessments. The matrix indicated only 23% of the mixtures satisfied JMF criteria and reported QC data—predominantly field mixtures—underscoring the impact of the fabrication mechanisms and the use of soft binders. This matrix integrates statistical analysis and binder performance assessments as a tool for verifying material compliance and tracking contractor efficiency. It reflects a transition from traditional QC toward a more proactive QA framework for sustainable pavements.
Keywords: quality assurance; RAP; RAS; decision matrix; interactions; fabrication mechanism; recovered binders; ANOVA quality assurance; RAP; RAS; decision matrix; interactions; fabrication mechanism; recovered binders; ANOVA

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Deef-Allah, E.; Abdelrahman, M. Quality Assurance Framework for Recovered Binders and Aggregates from Asphalt Mixtures Incorporating Recycled Materials. Recycling 2025, 10, 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10020071

AMA Style

Deef-Allah E, Abdelrahman M. Quality Assurance Framework for Recovered Binders and Aggregates from Asphalt Mixtures Incorporating Recycled Materials. Recycling. 2025; 10(2):71. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10020071

Chicago/Turabian Style

Deef-Allah, Eslam, and Magdy Abdelrahman. 2025. "Quality Assurance Framework for Recovered Binders and Aggregates from Asphalt Mixtures Incorporating Recycled Materials" Recycling 10, no. 2: 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10020071

APA Style

Deef-Allah, E., & Abdelrahman, M. (2025). Quality Assurance Framework for Recovered Binders and Aggregates from Asphalt Mixtures Incorporating Recycled Materials. Recycling, 10(2), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10020071

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop