Next Article in Journal
Magnetophoretic Cell Sorting: Comparison of Different 3D-Printed Millifluidic Devices
Previous Article in Journal
Magnetic Properties Regulation of FeGa and FeGaNi Films with Oblique Magnetron Sputtering
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Magnetic Properties of a Solid Solution Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 (0 < x < 0.2)

by
Galina G. Shabunina
,
Elena V. Busheva
,
Pavel N. Vasilev
* and
Nikolay N. Efimov
*
N. S. Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of Russian Academy of Sciences, 31 Leninsky Prosp., 119991 Moscow, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Magnetochemistry 2022, 8(10), 112; https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry8100112
Submission received: 28 July 2022 / Revised: 9 September 2022 / Accepted: 15 September 2022 / Published: 21 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ferrimagnetic Materials: State of the Art and Future Perspectives)

Abstract

:
The magnetic properties of the Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 (0 < x < 0.2) solid solution were investigated in the temperature range 4–300 K in a DC field of 0.1 and 45 kOe. Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 is characterized by the transition temperature from the paramagnetic to the ferromagnetic state (Tc) and the irreversibility temperature (Tirr). The replacement of iron with silver ions in Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 leads to an increase in the Curie temperatures from 185 K (x = 0) to 216 K (x = 0.2) and Tcusp from 45 K (x = 0) to 125 K (x = 0.2). A section of the Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 magnetic phase diagram in the region under study has been constructed. The diagram reveals the following regions: paramagnetic, ferromagnetic, region of conditionally recurrent spin-glass (SG), and below 10 K a region associated with orbital ordering.

1. Introduction

The work is dedicated to the study of the magnetic properties of spinel solid solutions based on a silver-doped iron dichromium tetrasulfide FeCr2S4. Interest in the effect of the replacement of iron ions by silver ions is due to the possibility of increasing the magnetic ordering temperature. At the same time, the interest of researchers in the Cr-based spinels, which have found to exhibit a unique combination of magnetic, semiconductor, and striction properties [1,2], and also have an unusual magnetic behavior at low temperatures, such as colossal magnetoresistance (CMR), has recently increased [3,4,5].
According to its properties, iron dichromium tetrasulfide (FeCr2S4) is a ferrimagnet (TC = 177–185 K) with a normal spinel structure, space group Fd3m. The magnetic moments of the Fe2+ and Cr3+ ions in FeCr2S4 at a temperature T = 4.2 K, according to the data of [6,7], are 4.2 μB and 2.9 μB, respectively. The value of the magnetic moment per FeCr2S4 molecule, equal to 1.8 μB, is in good agreement with the calculated moment for a simple Neel configuration [8,9,10,11]. The temperature dependence of the reciprocal molar susceptibility of the compound confirms the ferrimagnetic nature of the ordering. In this case, the Curie–Weiss law is fulfilled with the asymptotic Curie temperature θ = −260 ± 40 K [10].
At temperatures below 100 K, FeCr2S4 exhibits behavior similar to that of a spin glass: in a weak magnetic field. The compound exhibits the irreversibility of the zero field cooling (ZFC) and field cooling (FC) magnetization curves and parabolic anomalies in the region of T = 70 K due to a sharp increase in magnetic anisotropy. With a further decrease in temperature, a stepwise decrease and a subsequent rise in the ZFC and FC magnetization curves are revealed, which is associated with the presence of a structural transition at T = 9 K due to orbital ordering [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Taking into account the listed features in the studied system of solid solutions, one should apparently expect manifestations of unusual magnetic properties. The FeCr2S4 chalcospinel is a classical magnetic semiconductor, but as it has now been established, being a normal Heisenberg magnet, this compound, as it approaches absolute saturation in the region of helium temperatures, begins to show signs of instability, similar to a large extent to spin-glass or superparamagnetic behavior [19,20,21]. The nature of such magnetic behavior has not yet been fully elucidated.
The existence of a phase transition in FeCr2S4 at a temperature close to 60 K has been confirmed by transmission electron microscopy and measurements of dc- and ac-magnetic susceptibility [3,17,22].
Muon spin relaxation spectroscopy has shown that the ferrimagnetic structure of FeCr2S4 transforms at T~60 K into an incommensurate, nonsinusoidal spin structure, remaining stable up to temperatures of the orbital ordering state [23]. To interpret the properties of FeCr2S4, different models have been developed, related both to the transition in the symmetry of the structure and to the reentrant behavior of spin-glass or magnetic domains reorganisation.
Previously, our group synthesized samples of Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 solid solutions from elements by the method of solid-phase reactions, which have a limited homogeneity region equal to x = 0.22 [24]. According to XRD data, samples with 0 < x ≤ 0.2 were single-phase. With an increase in the silver content in the sample, the unit cell parameter increased in accordance with Vegard’s law (Figures S1 and S2).
It was found that the iron substitution by silver resulted to an increase in the Curie temperature by about 30 K (from 185 K (x = 0) to 214 K (x = 0.20) [24]. In this case, the solid solution based on iron dichromium tetrasulfide remained a ferrimagnet with a state characteristic of it at low temperatures, close to the state of a spin glass.
Also, in [25] for Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 (x = 0.05–0.15), we measured the temperature dependences of the real (χ′) and imaginary (χ″) parts of the ac-magnetic susceptibility at frequencies of 10–10,000 Hz with amplitudes HAC = 1 Oe and 15 Oe, which confirmed the nature and temperatures of magnetic transitions established in [24]. Namely, polycrystalline Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 was characterized not only by an increase in the Curie temperature (TC), but also by an increase in the temperature of the spin-glass state (Tf), depending on the silver concentration. It is assumed that an increase in the transition temperatures with an increase in the silver concentration may be due to the effect of diamagnetic dilution.
The presence of a cusp near ≈ 50 K, associated with a low-temperature structural anomaly for the Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 solid solution, was confirmed by measuring the temperature dependence of the imaginary part of the ac-magnetic susceptibility χ″ (T), with an increase in amplitude up to 15 Oe. The discrepancy in the behavior of the ac-susceptibility can be associated with the manifestation of domain wall pinning. This assumption has been justified by the application of an alternating field with a higher amplitude HAC = 15 Oe, which overcomes the pinning effect. Also, for Fe1−xAgxCr2S4, a transition was found at a temperature of TOO = 9–13 K, which is considered the temperature of long-range orbital ordering caused by the Jahn–Teller effect.
Taking into account the above, the Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 solid solution is a non-trivial object for magnetic property studying. This primarily applies to the maximum temperature used in magnetic measurements, as in our case, it is limited by the technical capabilities of the measuring equipment, as well as by the thermal stability of the solid solution under study.
The accuracy of determining the paramagnetic Curie temperature ƟP depends on the length of the high-temperature (above Tc) segment ΔT used to cut off the constant ƟP by extrapolating the χ1 versus T dependence. The possibility to somewhat refine the characteristics in paramagnetic range was additionally provided by the data on the measurement in [10] of the magnetic susceptibility of FeCr2S4 at high temperatures up to 1200 K (ƟP = −260 K), which made it possible to use them in this work as reference [3,22].
In present study our first priority was to measure and interpret the magnetic properties of the Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 solid samples in order to better understand the nature and mechanisms of the magnetic interactions in this solid solution.

2. Results and Discussion

The Figure 1a, Figure 2a, Figure 3a and Figure 4a show the temperature dependences of the magnetization M(T)ZFC and M(T)FC of a Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 solid solution with x = 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20 in the range from room to helium temperature in a weak magnetic field H = 100 Oe. As can be seen from these figures, the dependences M(T)ZFC and M(T)FC of the samples are characterized by two maxima of the temperature derivative of magnetization, the first of which corresponds to the transition from a paramagnetic state to a ferrimagnetic long-range ordered phase with Curie temperatures TC = 185–216 K (see Table 1). The Curie temperature for samples of same composition was in a good agreement with each other, regardless of whether it was determined from M(T)ZFC or M(T)FC and rising almost linearly with composition of Ag and reaches the value of 216 K (x = 0.2) (Figure 5). Effects corresponding to the probable ferrimagnet–spin glass transition (Tcusp) were also present in both M(T)ZFC and M(T)FC dependences. The temperature of the cusp increased with increasing silver concentration.
As can be seen from Figure 1a, Figure 2a, Figure 3a and Figure 4a, the Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 solid solution is characterized by the transition temperature from the paramagnetic to the ferrimagnetic state (TC), and the irreversibility temperature (Tirr) (the temperatures at which the curves M(T)ZFC and M(T)FC begin to diverge), which practically similar with the Tc of the sample. The divergence of the M(T)ZFC and M(T)FC curves is observed for temperatures well below the Curie point. In the M(T)FC case, the spins are blocked in the direction depending on the orienting external magnetic field which results in higher magnetization values at low temperatures.
Unlike TC, the temperature of irreversibility (Tirr) is not a characteristic parameter of the material. Its value may depend on the deviation from the stoichiometry of the sample, its crystalline state (single- or polycrystalline), as well as the presence of uncontrollable impurities [6]. Due to the fact that in all the Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 samples studied in this work, the values of the Curie temperatures TC and irreversibility Tirr practically coincide with each other, it can be assumed that this phenomenon has a common nature. The most probable reasons of such irreversibility are the large value of the magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant K1 and the pinning of magnetic domain walls. Thus, for FeCr2S4, the K1 value is one of the largest among spinels. In the magnetically ordered compound FeCr2S4 [17] it has a positive value and at T = 4.2 K it is equal to K1 = 3–6 × 106 erg/cm3 [3].
Note that the FeCr2S4 magnetization curves saturate only in high fields (H ≈ 5 T) and low temperatures (T ≈ 4 K) [9,19]. The need for strong fields to saturate the magnetization at low temperatures is explained by a strong increase in the magnetocrystalline anisotropy of the compound [5].
The introduction of nonmagnetic silver ions into FeCr2S4 creates additional pinning centers, which broaden the magnetic transition caused by a dramatic increase in the magnetocrystalline anisotropy at low-temperature.
In Figure 1a, Figure 2a, Figure 3a and Figure 4a, attention is drawn to the gentle maxima (cusps) on the curves M(T)ZFC and M(T)FC, which lie (depending on the concentration of introduced silver) at T = 45–125 K (see Table 1, column 4). The origin of these maxima, as shown in [8], is associated with the original iron thiochromite (FeCr2S4), the extreme composition of the Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 system. According to the data of [3], the temperature dependence of the magnetization in undoped FeCr2S4 has a number of traits that are more characteristic of cluster spin glasses or superparamagnets. However, in the case of Fe1−xAgxCr2S4, we are dealing with a more complex phenomenon that has features of a cluster spin glass. For the purposes of this study, all compositions can be considered as conditionally spin-glass ones, since elucidation of low-temperature anomalies origins in FeCr2S4 and its diluted compounds is outside the scope of this study.
Confirmation that the presence of effects such as cusp or spin glass at T = 45–125 K in the samples is associated with FeCr2S4 is an increasing temperature of these effects with an increase in the silver concentration, as well as their gradual smearing, indicating that with increasing x there is a weakening antiferromagnetic A-S-B exchange interaction.
As can be seen from Figure 1a, Figure 2a, Figure 3a and Figure 4a, as the temperature decreases below the Curie point in the Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 sample, ZFC and FC magnetization curves immediately shows an irreversible behavior, then an anomalous cusp appears at Tcusp, caused by a significant increase in magnetic anisotropy and subsequent spin reorientation of the domains. With a further decrease in the temperature of the sample, one more anomalous transition is revealed in the region of T ≈ 10 K, which has a stepwise motif, a decrease (ZFC) or an increase (FC) of the magnetizations associated with the onset of orbital ordering at a TOO temperature.
Figure 1b, Figure 2b, Figure 3b and Figure 4b show isothermal field dependences of the magnetization of the solid solution Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 (x = 0.05–0.20), measured up to H = 5 T, for various temperatures below TC. The shape of these dependences is characteristic of a ferrimagnet with parameters presented in Table 2.
Figure 5a shows a section of the magnetic phase diagram for Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 in the region 0 < x < 0.20, built on the basis of the measured magnetic properties summarized in the Table 1. The diagram shows the following regions: paramagnetic, ferrimagnetic, recurrent spin glass region, and region associated with orbital ordering.
The insets to Figure 1a, Figure 2a, Figure 3a and Figure 4a show the temperature dependences of the inverse molar magnetic susceptibility χ−1(T) of the Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 (x = 0.05–0.20) in a magnetic field of H = 4.5 T. The shape of the curves is characteristic for the ferrimagnets.
Investigation of the area in the high temperature region available to us for measurements, made it possible to determine the paramagnetic Curie temperature ΘP, the Curie-Weiss constant C, and the effective magnetic moment μeff (Table 1). By extrapolation of the straight line constructed from the points after the break of the curve χ−1(T), the values of the Curie temperature (Tc) were obtained, which coincide with Tc obtained from measurements in a weak magnetic field (Table 1, column 3).
With an increase in the silver content in the tetrahedral sublattice and a corresponding decrease in the iron content, the Curie temperatures increase as it can be seen from Figure 5. In the case of FeCr2S4 doped by diamagnetic Ag ions, the paramagnetic Curie temperature (Figure 5b) change the sign from negative to positive which corresponds to a change in the prevailing magnetic interactions in the samples.
The increase in ΘP with an increase in the silver concentration is due to the competition between positive and negative exchange interactions, accompanied by a decrease in the iron content which leads to the iron antiferromagnetic clusters downsizing.
The obtained experimental data are summarized in Table 1, where, depending on the amount of silver introduced (column 1), the unit cell parameter (2), the Curie temperature TC (3), the temperature of the cusp on the FC curves Tcusp (4), and the orbital ordering temperature Too (5), paramagnetic Curie temperature ΘP (6), Curie constant C (7), effective magnetic moment μeff (8).
Table 2 shows the coercive force Hc (2–4) for various temperatures below Tc, the residual magnetization MR (5), the maximum measured saturation magnetization M50kOe in a field H = 5 T at T = 4 K (6) and the magnetic moment calculated from its saturation μS (7). Due to the diamagnetic substitution of Ag+ ions for Fe2+ ions, the resulting magnetic saturation moment slightly increases due to a decrease in the competition between the magnetic moments in the sublattices of the Fe2+ and Cr3+ ions.

3. Materials and Methods

The following elements were used to obtain Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 solid solutions: Ag (99.999%), S (99.999%), Fe (99.98%) and Cr (99.8%) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Synthesis was carried out by the method of solid-phase reactions in evacuated quartz ampoules at temperatures of 850–900 °C according to the scheme given in [24].
Powder X-ray diffraction study (powder XRD) was carried out on a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer (CuKα, λ = 1.54 Å, Ni-filter, LYNXEYE detector, reflection geometry, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). All the samples studied in the present work were single-phase. X-ray diffraction patterns of the samples are shown on Figure S1.
The magnetic properties were measured using a PPMS-9 setup (Quantum Design, San Diego, CA, USA) in constant weak H = 100 Oe and strong H = 4.5 T magnetic fields. In the first case, ZFC, the sample was cooled down to the boiling point of liquid helium in the absence of a magnetic field, and then a weak measuring field was turned on and measurements were taken during heating. In the second case, FC, the measurements were carried out when the sample was cooled from room to helium temperature in a constant weak field. Field dependences of magnetization measurements were carried out up to magnetic field strengths H = 5 T. The magnetic transition temperature was found from the maximum of the derivative of the magnetization or the maximum of the cusp on the temperature dependence of the initial magnetization of the samples.
The paramagnetic Curie temperature (ƟP) was determined by extrapolation of the linear parts of the temperature dependence of inverse susceptibility χ−1 (T). The Curie-Weiss constant C was found from the slope of the rectilinear part of the dependence χ−1 (T), and the effective magnetic moment per molecule was calculated by the formula µeff = √8C µB.

4. Conclusions

According to the experimental data obtained, Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 solid solutions, which have a limited homogeneity region (0 < x < 0.2), are ferrimagnets. The Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 solid solution is characterized by the transition temperature from the paramagnetic to the ferrimagnetic state Tc and the irreversibility temperature (Tirr) (the temperature at which the M(T)ZFC and M(T)FC curves begin to diverge), which is in a good agreement with the Curie temperature of the sample. The replacement of iron with silver ions in Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 leads not only to an increase in the Curie temperatures (Tc) from 185 K (x = 0) to 216 K (x = 0.2), but also to an increase in Tcusp from 45 K (x = 0) to 125 K (x = 0.2). A segment of the Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 magnetic phase diagram in the region 0 < x < 0.20 has been constructed. The diagram reveals the following regions: paramagnetic, ferrimagnetic, recurrent spin glass region, and the region associated with orbital ordering. The temperature dependences of the reciprocal magnetic susceptibility χ−1 (T) of the solid solution Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 (x = 0.05–0.20) in a strong magnetic field H = 4.5 T are given. The Curie–Weiss constant C and the effective magnetic moment per molecule are calculated.
The concentration dependence of the paramagnetic Curie temperature is constructed. In this case, the paramagnetic Curie temperature changes sign from negative to positive at small additions of silver.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/magnetochemistry8100112/s1, Figure S1: X-ray diffraction patterns for Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 samples, Figure S2: Dependence of the parameter a of the crystal lattice on the content of Ag.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.G.S. and N.N.E.; methodology, E.V.B.; validation, N.N.E.; formal analysis, P.N.V. and E.V.B.; investigation, N.N.E. and P.N.V.; data curation, N.N.E. and P.N.V.; writing—original draft preparation, G.G.S. and E.V.B.; writing—review and editing, N.N.E. and P.N.V.; visualization, P.N.V. and E.V.B.; supervision, N.N.E.; project administration, N.N.E.; funding acquisition, N.N.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was carried out within the framework of the state assignment of the IGIC RAS in the field of fundamental scientific research.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research was performed using the equipment of the JRC PMR IGIC RAS.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ramirez, A.P.; Cava, R.J.; Krajewski, J. Colossal Magnetoresistance in Cr-Based Chalcogenide Spinels. Nature 1997, 386, 156–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tokura, Y.; Tomioka, Y. Colossal Magnetoresistive Manganites. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1999, 200, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hemberger, J.; Lunkenheimer, P.; Fichtl, R.; Krug Von Nidda, H.A.; Tsurkan, V.; Loidl, A. Relaxor Ferroelectricity and Colossal Magnetocapacitive Coupling in Ferromagnetic CdCr2S4. Nature 2005, 434, 364–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yang, Z.; Tan, S.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Y. Magnetic Polaron Conductivity in FeCr2S4 with the Colossal Magnetoresistance Effect. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 621, 13872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bertinshaw, J.; Ulrich, C.; Günther, A.; Schrettle, F.; Wohlauer, M.; Krohns, S.; Reehuis, M.; Studer, A.J.; Avdeev, M.; Quach, D.V.; et al. FeCr2S4 in Magnetic Fields: Possible Evidence for a Multiferroic Ground State. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wilkinson, C.; Knapp, B.M.; Forsyth, F.J. The Magnetic Structure of Cu0.5Ga0.5Cr2S4. J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 1976, 9, 4021–4033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shirane, G.; Cox, D.E.; Pickart, S.J. Magnetic Structures in FeCr2S4 and FeCr2O4. J. Appl. Phys. 1964, 35, 954–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lotgering, F.K.; Van Stapele, R.P.; Van Der Steen, G.H.A.M.; Van Wieringen, J.S. Magnetic Properties, Conductivity and Ionic Ordering in Fe1−XCuxCr2S4. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1969, 30, 799–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Krupička, S. Physik Der Ferrite Und Der Verwandten Magnetischen Oxide; Vieweg+Teubner Verlag Wiesbaden: Prague, Czech Republic, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gibart, P.; Dormann, J.-L.; Pellerin, Y. Magnetic Properties of FeCr2S4 and CoCr2S4. Phys. Status Solidi 1969, 36, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Palmer, H.M.; Greaves, C. Structural, Magnetic and Electronic Properties of Fe0.5Cu0.5Cr2S4. J. Mater. Chem. 1999, 9, 637–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fichtl, R.; Tsurkan, V.; Lunkenheimer, P.; Hemberger, J.; Fritsch, V.; Von Nidda, H.A.K.; Scheidt, E.W.; Loidl, A. Orbital Freezing and Orbital Glass State in FeCr2S4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94, 027601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Krimmel, A.; Mücksch, M.; Tsurkan, V.; Koza, M.M.; Mutka, H.; Loidl, A. Vibronic and Magnetic Excitations in the Spin-Orbital Liquid State of FeSc2S4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94, 2–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Krimmel, A.; Mücksch, M.; Tsurkan, V.; Koza, M.M.; Mutka, H.; Ritter, C.; Sheptyakov, D.V.; Horn, S.; Loidl, A. Magnetic Ordering and Spin Excitations in the Frustrated Magnet MnSc2S4. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2006, 73, 014413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tsurkan, V.; Hemberger, J.; Klemm, M.; Klimm, S.; Loidl, A.; Horn, S.; Tidecks, R. Ac Susceptibility Studies of Ferrimagnetic FeCr2S4 Single Crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 2001, 90, 4639–4644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tsurkan, V.; Baran, M.; Szymczak, R.; Szymczak, H.; Tidecks, R. Spin-Glass like States in the Ferrimagnet FeCr2S4. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2001, 296, 301–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mertinat, M.; Tsurkan, V.; Samusi, D.; Tidecks, R.; Haider, F. Low-Temperature Structural Transition in FeCr2S4. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2005, 71, 100408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Maurer, D.; Tsurkan, V.; Horn, S.; Tidecks, R. Ultrasonic Study of Ferrimagnetic FeCr2S4: Evidence for Low Temperature Structural Transformations. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 93, 9173–9176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Aminov, T.G.; Shabunina, G.G.; Novotortsev, V.M. Magnetic Properties of (Cu0.5Ga0.5)1−xFexCr2S4 Solid Solutions. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 59, 1312–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aminov, T.G.; Busheva, E.V.; Shabunina, G.G.; Novotortsev, V.M. Magnetic Properties of (Cu0.5In0.5)1−XFexCr2S4 (x = 0–0.3) Solid Solutions. Inorg. Mater. 2018, 54, 998–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tsurkan, V.; Zaharko, O.; Schrettle, F.; Kant, C.; Deisenhofer, J.; Krug Von Nidda, H.A.; Felea, V.; Lemmens, P.; Groza, J.R.; Quach, D.V.; et al. Structural Anomalies and the Orbital Ground State in FeCr2S4. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2010, 81, 184426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Yamasaki, Y.; Miyasaka, S.; Kaneko, Y.; He, J.P.; Arima, T.; Tokura, Y. Magnetic Reversal of the Ferroelectric Polarization in a Multiferroic Spinel Oxide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 207204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kalvius, G.M.; Krimmel, A.; Hartmann, O.; Wäppling, R.; Wagner, F.E.; Litterst, F.J.; Tsurkan, V.; Loidl, A. Low Temperature Incommensurately Modulated and Noncollinear Spin Structure in FeCr2S4. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2010, 22, 052205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Aminov, T.G.; Shabunina, G.G.; Busheva, E.V. Synthesis and Magnetic Properties of Silver-Doped Iron Dichromium Tetrasulfide. Inorg. Mater. 2020, 56, 771–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Aminov, T.G.; Shabunina, G.G.; Busheva, E.V.; Efimov, N.N. Dynamic Magnetic Susceptibility of Silver-Doped Iron Thiochromite. Inorg. Mater. 2022, 58, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Dependences of the M vs. T of FC and ZFC (M(T)ZFC or M(T)FC) magnetization for Fe0.95Ag0.05Cr2S4 in a 100 Oe field. Inset: dependence of the inverse magnetic susceptibility versus temperature for this composition. (b) Dependences of the magnetization versus magnetic field for Fe0.95Ag0.05Cr2S4 at 4 and 150 K.
Figure 1. (a) Dependences of the M vs. T of FC and ZFC (M(T)ZFC or M(T)FC) magnetization for Fe0.95Ag0.05Cr2S4 in a 100 Oe field. Inset: dependence of the inverse magnetic susceptibility versus temperature for this composition. (b) Dependences of the magnetization versus magnetic field for Fe0.95Ag0.05Cr2S4 at 4 and 150 K.
Magnetochemistry 08 00112 g001
Figure 2. (a) Dependences of the M vs. T of FC and ZFC magnetization for Fe0.90Ag0.10Cr2S4 in a 100 Oe field. Inset: dependence of the inverse magnetic susceptibility versus temperature for this composition. (b) Dependences of the magnetization versus magnetic field for Fe0.90Ag0.10Cr2S4 at 4 and 150 K.
Figure 2. (a) Dependences of the M vs. T of FC and ZFC magnetization for Fe0.90Ag0.10Cr2S4 in a 100 Oe field. Inset: dependence of the inverse magnetic susceptibility versus temperature for this composition. (b) Dependences of the magnetization versus magnetic field for Fe0.90Ag0.10Cr2S4 at 4 and 150 K.
Magnetochemistry 08 00112 g002
Figure 3. (a) Dependences of the M vs. T of FC and ZFC magnetization for Fe0.85Ag0.15Cr2S4 in a 100 Oe field. Inset: dependence of the inverse magnetic susceptibility versus temperature for this composition. (b) Dependences of the magnetization versus magnetic field for Fe0.85Ag0.15Cr2S4 at 4 and 150 K.
Figure 3. (a) Dependences of the M vs. T of FC and ZFC magnetization for Fe0.85Ag0.15Cr2S4 in a 100 Oe field. Inset: dependence of the inverse magnetic susceptibility versus temperature for this composition. (b) Dependences of the magnetization versus magnetic field for Fe0.85Ag0.15Cr2S4 at 4 and 150 K.
Magnetochemistry 08 00112 g003
Figure 4. (a) Dependences of the M vs. T of FC and ZFC magnetization for Fe0.80Ag0.20Cr2S4 in a 100 Oe field. Inset: dependence of the inverse magnetic susceptibility versus temperature for this composition. (b) Field dependences of the magnetization for Fe0.80Ag0.20Cr2S4 at 4 and 150 K.
Figure 4. (a) Dependences of the M vs. T of FC and ZFC magnetization for Fe0.80Ag0.20Cr2S4 in a 100 Oe field. Inset: dependence of the inverse magnetic susceptibility versus temperature for this composition. (b) Field dependences of the magnetization for Fe0.80Ag0.20Cr2S4 at 4 and 150 K.
Magnetochemistry 08 00112 g004
Figure 5. (a) Section of the magnetic phase diagram for Fe1−xAgxCr2S4. (b) Concentration dependence of the paramagnetic Curie temperature for Fe1−xAgxCr2S4.
Figure 5. (a) Section of the magnetic phase diagram for Fe1−xAgxCr2S4. (b) Concentration dependence of the paramagnetic Curie temperature for Fe1−xAgxCr2S4.
Magnetochemistry 08 00112 g005
Table 1. Magnetic parameters of Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 solid solutions.
Table 1. Magnetic parameters of Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 solid solutions.
Composition xAga,
Å
TC, KTcusp FC, KTcusp ZFC, KTOO, KΘP,
K
Cμeff, μB
123456789
09.990185455010−2603.965.63
0.059.9931948290101342.234.23
0.19.996208100115111601.973.97
0.1510.002212110125131791.753.74
0.210.00421612513591991.743.73
Table 2. Characteristics of hysteresis loops of Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 solid solutions at different temperatures.
Table 2. Characteristics of hysteresis loops of Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 solid solutions at different temperatures.
x AgHC, Oe T = 4 KHC, Oe T = 100 KHC, Oe T = 150 KMR, G·cm3/molM50kOe, G·cm3/molμS, μB
1234567
0432451523598861.77
0.05311322449110,5921.89
0.10302334459810,8081.93
0.15289344383010,4871.88
0.20166 351110,2291.83
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shabunina, G.G.; Busheva, E.V.; Vasilev, P.N.; Efimov, N.N. Magnetic Properties of a Solid Solution Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 (0 < x < 0.2). Magnetochemistry 2022, 8, 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry8100112

AMA Style

Shabunina GG, Busheva EV, Vasilev PN, Efimov NN. Magnetic Properties of a Solid Solution Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 (0 < x < 0.2). Magnetochemistry. 2022; 8(10):112. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry8100112

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shabunina, Galina G., Elena V. Busheva, Pavel N. Vasilev, and Nikolay N. Efimov. 2022. "Magnetic Properties of a Solid Solution Fe1−xAgxCr2S4 (0 < x < 0.2)" Magnetochemistry 8, no. 10: 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry8100112

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop