Next Article in Journal
Chemotypes of Species of the Genus Thymus L. in Carpathians Region of Ukraine—Their Essential Oil Qualitative and Quantitative Characteristics and Antimicrobial Activity
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Potential Genes Conferring Resistance or Susceptibility to Bacterial Canker in Tomato
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction (UAE) for Simultaneous Determination of Individual Phenolic Compounds in 15 Dried Edible Flowers
Previous Article in Special Issue
HyPRP1, A Tomato Multipotent Regulator, Negatively Regulates Tomato Resistance to Sulfur Dioxide Toxicity and Can Also Reduce Abiotic Stress Tolerance of Escherichia coli and Tobacco
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Horticulturae
Volume 8
Issue 12
10.3390/horticulturae8121217
horticulturae-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of BC3F2 Tomato Genotypes with Arthropod Resistance Introgressed from Solanum habrochaites var. hirsutum (PI127826)

by
Flávia Cristina Panizzon Diniz
1,
Juliano Tadeu Vilela de Resende
1,*,
Renato Barros de Lima-Filho
2,
Laura Pilati
3,
Gabriella Correia Gomes
1,
Sergio Ruffo Roberto
1 and
Paulo Roberto Da-Silva
3
1
Agronomy Department, Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina 86057-970, PR, Brazil
2
Agronomy Department, Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM), Maringá 87020-900, PR, Brazil
3
Plant Genetics and Molecular Biology Laboratory (DNA Lab), Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste (UNICENTRO), Guarapuava 85015-430, PR, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2022, 8(12), 1217; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8121217
Submission received: 12 November 2022 / Revised: 10 December 2022 / Accepted: 12 December 2022 / Published: 19 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genes, Genetics and Breeding of Tomato)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Arthropod pests are among the biggest problems faced in tomato production worldwide. To overcome the losses caused by these pests, one of the most sustainable and economical strategies is the use of resistance introgressed from wild species. We aimed to develop BC3F2 tomato genotypes with high levels of zingiberene (ZGB) and resistance to whitefly (Bemisia tabaci biotype B), South American tomato pinworm (Tuta absoluta), and the two-spotted spider mite (Tatranychus urticae), from the wild accession of Solanum habrochaites var. hirsutum (accession PI127826). The quantification of ZGB in 520 BC3F2 genotypes and in the parentals yielded the selection of five genotypes with high ZGB content and three with low ZGB content, which were then infested with B. tabaci, T. absolute, and T. urticae. In these eight genotypes and in the parents, the types and amounts of trichomes on the leaves were determined. Additionally, molecular markers were used to identify the genotypes with a higher recurrent genome recovery. The results confirmed the transfer of resistance from S. habrochaites to the BC3F2 genotypes and showed that this resistance seems to be directly related to high concentrations of ZGB and the presence of type IV trichomes.

1. Introduction

The tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is one of the most economically important vegetables worldwide, surpassed only by the potato [1,2,3,4]. Its wide acceptance and commercialization are due to its rich nutritional value [5] and high versatility—it can be consumed raw, or it can be processed in many ways [6,7]. World tomato production exceeded 180 million tons in the 2019/2020 season [8]. The growing market demand for tomatoes requires a constant effort from breeders. In recent decades, there has been growing consumer interest in tomatoes produced in a sustainable way and with less harmful health effects. For example, the use of insecticides to control diseases and pests needs to be reduced.
Diseases and pests are constant problems in tomato cultivation worldwide [9]. The main pests include the whitefly [Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) biotype B] [10,11], the South American tomato pinworm [Tuta absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)] [12,13], and the two-spotted spider mite [Tatranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae)] [14,15]. These pests attack tomato crops causing severe damage, which increases production costs and decreases financial profitability for the producer [16,17]. For example, when a tomato plantation is attacked by T. absoluta and control is not correctly carried out, economic losses can reach 100%. The main management method used to mitigate the losses caused by arthropod pests in tomatoes is chemical control [11]. However, the intensive use of chemical products can damage the environment and the health of farmers and consumers [18]. In addition, there may be a reduction in the population of insects that are the natural enemies of pests [19], as well as a reduction in the generation of pest populations resistant to the chemical molecules of insecticides [20]. A healthier and more environmentally friendly strategy is that of genetic resistance [21]. However, domestication has reduced the resistance of cultivated tomato varieties. To increase tomato resistance to pests, commercial cultivars can be crossed with wild accessions that produce secondary metabolites that negatively affect the pests [22,23,24,25].
The wild species Solanum pennellii Correl and Solanum habrochaites S. Knapp & D.M. Spooner var. hirsutum confer resistance to a wide range of pests [6,26] due to the presence of chemical compounds called acylsugars and/or zingiberene (referred to as ZGB throughout the text), present in leaflets, which are exuded by glandular trichomes, mainly of type IV and VI [27,28,29,30,31,32]. These allelochemicals promote resistance because they have deleterious effects on the feeding process and/or life cycle of pests [21]. Promising results are being obtained by crossing commercial cultivars with wild species and by the selection of genotypes with high levels of ZGB or acylsugars and, consequently, high resistance to arthropod pests [33]. Examples of the successful introgression of arthropod pest resistance genes into domesticated tomatoes have generally occurred through the backcrossing of commercial cultivars with wild tomato species S. pennellii and Solanum. peruvianum (L.) Mill [34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. However, despite S. habrochaites var. hirsutum also presenting high resistance to pests, it has rarely been used in gene introgression programs.
With the advancement of biotechnology, the use of molecular markers has accelerated backcrossing programs for both background and foreground selection [41,42,43]. Background selection using molecular markers is always advantageous and economically viable as it can accelerate the backcrossing program by allowing the selection of plants with a higher proportion of the recurrent parental genome. Conversely, foreground selection is advantageous when the trait to be incorporated is difficult to assess by phenotype. However, for tomato resistance to arthropod pests, there has been limited research on marker-assisted backcrossing.
In this study, we aimed to explore resistance to arthropod pests in wild tomato. S. habrochaites var. hirsutum. We describe the development of BC3F2 tomato genotypes with resistance to T. urticae, B. tabaci, and T. absoluta derived from S. habrochaites var. hirsutum. Furthermore, we evaluate which type of trichome was correlated with arthropod resistance in wild species and BC3F2 genotypes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Breeding Strategy

To obtain the 520 genotypes in the BC3F2 generation used in this study, three plants of the BC2F2 generation, obtained by backcrossing between the commercial cultivar Redenção (S. lycopersicum) (referred to as SLR throughout the text) and the wild species S. habrochaites var. hirsutum (line PI127826) (referred to as SHH throughout the text), were backcrossed with SLR and, the BC3F1 genotypes obtained were self-fertilized. All previous steps of the backcrossing breeding program are described in the works of [21,30,44] and summarized in Figure 1. SLR (used as a female parent and recurrent in the backcrossing program) has characteristics suitable for industrial processing, is resistant to geminiviruses and tospoviruses, has low levels of ZGB, and is susceptible to pests. The SHH genotype, used as a male pollen-donor parent, has a high ZGB content and is a known source of pest resistance.
The 520 BC3F2 and primary parental genotypes (SLR and SHH) were grown in pots containing sieved soil corrected for acidity and fertilized as recommended for the tomato crop. Thirty days after planting, each plant was cloned using axillary shoots. When the clones reached the four-leaf stage, they were transplanted into 5 L polyethylene pots filled with the soil mentioned above. The plants were trained using a vertical guide and irrigated by a drip system. The plants were kept in a greenhouse with a humidity of 55 ± 5% and a temperature of 25 ± 5 °C. The cloning strategy was used to obtain genetically identical plants needed for use in the different experiments carried out in this study (ZGB evaluation, test with three different pests, trichome counts).

2.2. Zingiberene Quantification

The quantification of ZGB in the 520 BC3F2 genotypes, and in the parental ZLR (low ZGB content) and SHH (high ZGB content) (used as controls), was performed using a spectrophotometer according to the methodology proposed by the authors of [45]. The sampling of material for ZGB analysis was performed from plants in the pre-flowering period (about 40 d after transplanting) maintained as described above. Six discs of fully expanded young leaflets were collected from the upper third of each plant with the aid of a paper punching, obtaining a leaf area of 6 cm2 in total. Discs were placed in test tubes. Subsequently, 2 mL of hexane was added to each tube and stirred for 40 s using a vortex. Immediately afterwards, the absorbance reading was performed at a wavelength of 270 nm in a Cary 60 UV Vis spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The absorbance values obtained were proportional to the amount of ZGB present in the samples [45].
Evaluations were carried out for each genotype in triplicate, and the average of the three evaluations was used to classify the genotypes. After identifying the five plants with the highest concentration of ZGB and the three with the lowest concentration, the plants were cloned again as described above, and the clones obtained were used to evaluate the amount and type of trichomes and their resistance to arthropods.

2.3. Trichome Analysis

To count and identify the types of trichomes present in the eight BC3F2 genotypes with high and low ZGB content (selected in the previous step) and the parental genotypes, five young fully expanded leaflets were collected from the middle third of the plants. Sampling was performed 45 d after transplanting. Approximately 12 mm2 of collected leaflets were cut and prepared on microscope slides. Four blades of each leaf face (abaxial and adaxial) were prepared from each genotype. Ground graphite was added to the material to be analyzed. Slide images were captured (1 mm2) with four images of each side of the leaf, that is, four repetitions. The images were captured by scanning electron microscope (SEM; Tescan® model Vega3 microscope in XM camera size and HV, Brun, Czech Republic) with an accelerating voltage of 5 kv. After obtaining the images, the identification and counting of the types of trichomes present was carried out using the classification proposed by Luckwill [46].

2.4. Bamesia tabaci Resistance Test

The evaluation of resistance to whitefly (B. tabaci) was carried out in the eight BC3F2 genotypes selected in the ZGB quantification step and in the parental genotypes. The insects used were obtained from a population maintained on cabbage plants (Brassica oleraceae var. acephala). A sufficient number of flies for the experiment were obtained by multiplication on the tomato cv. Santa Clara (S. lycopersicum), which is susceptible to pests. The infestation of the Santa Clara plant was conducted by placing whitefly-infested cabbage leaves on tomato plants kept in wooden cages (1.0 m wide × 1.0 m deep × 1.20 m high), built with an antifidic screen coating.
The experiment to evaluate resistance to B. tabaci in BC3F2 tomato genotypes was carried out in a greenhouse with a temperature of 25 ± 3 °C, humidity of 55 ± 5%, and daily irrigation. The experimental design consisted of randomized blocks with four replications. Each pot with one plant was considered an experimental unit. To infest the experimental plants, the infested Santa Clara plants were removed from the cages, and the whiteflies were distributed inside the greenhouse between the lines of the blocks of the BC3F2 genotypes and the parental genotypes.
Twenty-one days after the infestation, the number of eggs and nymphs on the leaflets were determined. Three young fully expanded leaflets were collected, one from the upper third, one from the middle third, and one from the lower third of each plant. With the aid of a binocular stereoscopic microscope, eggs and nymphs on the abaxial surface of the leaflet in a leaf area corresponding to 2 cm2 were counted.

2.5. Tuta absoluta Risistance Test

Resistance to T. absoluta was determined using the same genotypes described for B. tabaci, with the same experimental design and maintained under the same environmental conditions. The population of T. absoluta used in the experiment was also established in the Santa Clara cultivar in a wooden cage with an anti-aphid screen. The infestation of BC3F2 and parental genotypes was carried out with the removal of infested Santa Clara cultivar plants from cages between the lines of the blocks of the BC3F2 and parental genotypes.
The severity of damage caused by T. absoluta was analyzed 21 d after the infestation according to the scale of scores attributed to leaflet lesions proposed by Labory et al. [47]. The scale is as follows: 0, no injury; 1, small and innumerable lesions; 2, small and medium lesions, few in number, and frequently located on the edges of the leaflets; 3, medium and large lesions, numerous and coalescent, and deformed leaflet edges; 4, large coalescent lesions, completely deformed leaflets; and 5, lesions covering the entire leaflet.

2.6. Tatranichus Urticae Resistance Test

The population of T. urticae used in the experiment was maintained on bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in a controlled environment (temperature, 20 ± 3 °C; humidity, 55 ± 5%). The experiment was carried out with insects of the same age. These age-uniform insects were obtained by the microscopic selection of adult females for oviposition. After selection, these females were transferred to bean leaflets kept in Petri dishes and placed in a temperature- and humidity-controlled growth chamber, as previously described. After 72 h, the females were removed, and the leaflets were kept in a controlled environment for the eggs to hatch. The population obtained was used in the bioassays as described below.
A test known as a ‘mite race’ was carried out following the methodology proposed by Weston and Snyder [48]. Young, fully expanded, uniformly sized leaflets were removed from the upper third of each genotype to be tested in the pre-flowering phase of the plants (45 d after transplanting). Subsequently, these leaflets were placed on a sheet of A4 bond paper, and this was fixed on a Styrofoam plate. In the center of each leaflet, with the adaxial side facing upwards, a 9 mm diameter thumbtack was fixed. Then, ten mites were released in the center of the thumbtack with the aid of a fine brush. After 60 min, the distances traveled by the mites on the leaflets from the center of the thumbtack were measured in millimeters. According to Weston and Snyder [48], the shorter the distance traveled by the mite on the leaflet surface, the higher the resistance level. Therefore, for the mites that remained on the tack, the distance covered was considered to be zero. The maximum potential distance was from the center of the thumbtack to the leaf tip.

2.7. Statistical Analyses

The identification of statistical differences between the amount of trichomes and the level of resistance to whitefly B. tabaci, T. absoluta, and T. urticae found in each genotype and in the parental genotypes was performed by an analysis of variance, considering the assumptions of normality of errors (Shapiro–Wilk test), homogeneity of variances (Levene’s test), and Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. All analyses were performed using the agricolae package available in R software (https://www.r-project.org/, accessed on 11 November 2022).

2.8. Evaluation of Recurrent Genome Recovery

The identification of BC3F2 genotypes with a higher recurrent genome recovery was performed using inter-simple sequence-repeat (ISSR) molecular markers developed by the University of British Columbia, Canada. The DNA of the five genotypes with high ZGB content and the recurrent parent was extracted following the protocol proposed in [49]. After extraction, the DNA was amplified by PCR using 10 ISSR primers (Table 1). The amplification reaction for each genotype was composed of 20 ng genomic DNA, 0.5 μM primer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 μM of each dNTP, 1 U Taq DNA polymerase, 1.5 μL 1× PCR buffer, and water to make the final volume 12.5 µL. PCR amplification was performed in a Veriti thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with the following program: initial DNA denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles at 94 °C for 45 s, primer annealing temperature for 45 s (according to Table 1), and 72 °C for 90 s to extend the fragments; and final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. All reagents used were from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA).
The amplification products were resolved by electrophoresis on a 1.8% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 μg mL−1), subjected to a constant current of 110 V for 4 h, visualized under UV light, and photo-documented with a L-PIX-HE digital system (Loccus, Cotia, SP, Brazil. A DNA ladder (100 bp) was used as standard to determine the size of the amplified fragments in base pairs. A binary matrix, obtained by genotyping individuals according to the presence (1) or absence of bands (0), was used to calculate the genetic similarity between genotypes based on Jaccard’s coefficient using NTSYS-pc 2.2 software [50].

3. Results

3.1. Zingiberene Quantification

The quantification of ZGB yielded the identification of the BC3F2 genotypes with higher allelochemical contents (RVTZpl#348, RVTZpl#361, RVTZpl#344, RVTZpl#448, and RVTZpl#346) and those with lower contents (RVTZpl#128, RVTZpl# 125, and RVTZpl#126). The genotypes with high ZGB contents showed values close to those observed in SHH (control for high ZGB contents). Additionally, those selected with low contents had values close to SLR, which is recognized for having low ZGB contents (Table 2).

3.2. Trichome Analysis

Among the types of trichomes evaluated, there were more type IV glandular trichomes (Figure 2a,b) in the SHH parental genotypes and the genotypes with higher concentrations of ZGB. Additionally, this type of trichome was the only one that showed a positive and significant correlation with leaflet ZGB concentration (Table 2). Conversely, type VI glandular trichomes (Figure 2c,d) were present in low amounts in the both SHH and SLR parental genotypes and in the genotypes derived from these parentals. Non-glandular trichomes were absent on the abaxial surface, but they were present in high numbers on the adaxial surface of SHH leaflets and in high numbers on both sides of the SLR leaflets (Table 2).

3.3. Bamesia tabaci Resistance Test

The genotypes with high and low ZGB content showed differences in whitefly resistance (Figure 3, Table 2). The smallest number of whitefly eggs and nymphs deposited on leaflets was observed in genotypes with a high ZGB content (Table 2). The results of these genotypes were similar to those observed for the wild parental SHH genotype, which had the lowest ovoposition rates and number of nymphs among all evaluated genotypes.
The RVTZpl#348 and RVTZpl#361 genotypes with a high ZGB content showed a low incidence of eggs (Table 2). The RVTZpl#346 and RVTZpl#348 genotypes, also with a high ZGB content, had the lowest number of nymphs on leaflets (Table 2). There was a significant negative correlation between mean ZGB level and both mean number of eggs and mean number of nymphs (Table 2). Significant negative correlations were also observed between the mean number of type IV glandular trichomes on the abaxial face and the whitefly mean number of eggs, as well as between the mean number of type IV glandular trichomes on the adaxial surface and the mean number of eggs and nymphs (Table 2).

3.4. Tuta absoluta Risistance Test

There was no significant difference in leaflet damage caused by T. absoluta between genotypes with a high ZGB content and the SHH genotype. There was also no significant different between genotypes with a low ZGB content and the SLR genotype (Table 2). More severe leaflet lesions were observed in genotypes with low ZGB contents (Figure 4). There was a significant negative correlation between the mean ZGB content and mean area of leaflet lesions (Table 2), as well as between the mean area of leaflets lesions and the mean number of type IV glandular trichomes on the abaxial and adaxial face (Table 2).

3.5. Tatranichus urticae Resistance Test

In the mite race study on the leaflets, there was a lower average distance traveled in genotypes with a a high ZGB content compared to in genotypes with a low ZGB content. There was a negative significant correlation between the mean distance traveled by T. urticae and the average content of ZGB in the genotypes (Table 2), as well as between the mean distance traveled and the mean number of type IV glandular trichomes on both sides of the leaflets. The shortest distance traveled by the mites occurred on the wild parent SHH, followed by the genotype RVTZpl#344 (Table 2).

3.6. Evaluation of Recurrent Genome Recovery

The 10 ISSR primers used amplified 104 loci and, of these, 49 were polymorphic. The genetic similarity between the evaluated genotypes and the recurrent parent SLR was 0.48 with RVTZpl#348, 0.29 with RVTZpl#361, 0.43 with RVTZpl#344, 0.35 with RVTZpl#448, and 0.25 with RVTZpl#346.

4. Discussion

The BC3F2 tomato genotypes with high levels of ZGB introgressed from S. habrochaites var. hirsutum (PI127826) were found to be promising genotypes for the development of tomato lineages with broad resistance to arthropods. This conclusion is based on the resistance behavior of these genotypes in response to infestation with B. tabaci biotype B, T. absoluta, and T. urticae. The level of resistance of the BC3F2 tomato genotypes was equal to that of the wild tomato species SHH, recognized for its resistance to arthropods [34,51,52]. Our study shows that the transfer of resistance from SHH to cultivated tomatoes is an effective and sustainable strategy to obtain tomato lineages with a broad spectrum of resistance to the main arthropods that cause damage to the crop.
The high concentrations of ZGB in BC3F2 genotypes show that the genes responsible for this characteristic in the SHH line PI127826 were effectively transferred in our backcrossing program. The presence of high levels of ZGB is widely known as a resistance factor to several pest arthropods in tomatoes, such as B. tabaci [27,44,53,54,55,56], T. absoluta [28,44,54,57,58,59], and T. urticae [30,33,52,60,61]. The inheritance of ZGB production in SHH is possibly controlled by a major gene [53], which facilitates introgression in commercial cultivars. Despite this, SHH has rarely been explored in breeding for resistance to arthropods. Other than [54], only our research group has documented the development of arthropod-resistant genotypes using SHH as a gene source [21,30,44,59,61].
In BC3F2 genotypes, type IV glandular trichomes seem to be fundamental in resistance to the three pest species studied (Table 1). Furthermore, the positive and significant correlation between the amount of trichomes in the BC3F2 genotypes and high levels of ZGB confirms the role of these trichomes in resistance. In wild tomatoes, type I, IV, and VI trichomes have been the most important in pest resistance [29,58]. In S. habrochaites line LA2329, resistance to T. urticae was related to a high density of type IV and VI trichomes [52]. The same was true for whitefly resistance in line PI127826 [53]. An analysis of trichomes in three different SHH lines (G1.1561, LA1718, LA1777) showed that the amount of type IV trichomes was different in each lineage studied [58]; thus, they may present different degrees of resistance to arthropods. The fact that we did not find a significant correlation between type VI trichomes and zingiberene content (Table 2) indicates that there are genetic/morphological differences in resistance between accessions PI127826 and LA2329 of SHH. Additionally, considering that the authors of [53] used the same SSH lineage as in our study (PI127826), it is possible to conclude that the inheritance of the two types of trichomes are independent. It is possible that the selection performed in our study yielded the maintenance of plants with a higher prevalence of type IV trichomes. Interestingly, type IV trichomes were the only ones to confer resistance to the whitefly in all life stages of the pest [27]. Therefore, our data indicate that the high presence of glandular type IV trichomes, derived from the SHH line PI127826 and associated with a high concentration of ZGB, may be sufficient to guarantee resistance to pest arthropods in tomatoes.
The bioassays confirmed that the presence of type IV trichomes in BC3F2 genotypes, which were associated with high concentrations of ZGB, seems to promote mostly antixenosis resistance to B. tabaci. This conclusion is based on the oviposition results and the consequent reduction in the number of nymphs. Genotypes with a high ZGB content decrease B. tabaci oviposition per unit of leaf area, leading to a reduction in pest populations to levels that may not be harmful to the plant [27,54,55,56]. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that, in our study, the proportion of the number of eggs and the number of nymphs was similar in resistant and susceptible genotypes, which indicates weak, or an absence of, antibiosis resistance in this phase of the pest’s life cycle. Additionally, antixenosis resistance seems to be acting in T. urticae as they avoided moving over the leaflet, and type IV trichomes, associated with high ZGB content, may be acting as a repellent. As for T. absoluta, it was not possible to confirm which type of resistance was active in the BC3F2 genotypes as the number of eggs was not counted. Therefore, the smaller area of lesions may be related both to the repellence of winged adults to oviposition and to the toxicity to caterpillars after the eggs hatch and they feed on plant tissue.
The use of ISSR markers allowed us to identify different levels of similarity between the BC3F2 genotypes resistant to arthropods and the recurrent cultivar SLR, which showed different rates of recovery of the recurrent genome. The application of the marker-assisted selection of resistance to arthropods in tomatoes is not an approach that is being used and/or documented, as only one study was found [62]. However, the incorporation of resistance to fungal, bacterial, viral, and nematode diseases using markers for foreground and/or background selection has been widely documented in tomatoes [63]. In this sense, considering that we found genetic differences in SLR between the BC3F2 genotypes, the method was efficient. Therefore, the genotypes RVTZpl#348, RVTZpl#344, and RVTZpl#448 obtained in our breeding program are the most promising for further use in the backcrossing program and for a quick recovery of market characteristics in the obtained genotypes.
In summary, our data confirms the successful introgression of resistance to B. tabaci, T. absoluta, and T. urticae from S. habrochaites var. hirtsutum (line PI127826) for BC3F2 genotypes. Furthermore, the combination of resistance data and recurrent genome recovery identified the BC3F2 genotypes RVTZpl#348, RVTZpl#344, and RVTZpl#448 as the most promising for continuation of the breeding program.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.T.V.d.R., P.R.D.-S. and F.C.P.D.; methodology, F.C.P.D., R.B.d.L.-F., L.P. and G.C.G.; analysis, F.C.P.D., R.B.d.L.-F., L.P. and G.C.G.; investigation, F.C.P.D., R.B.d.L.-F., L.P. and G.C.G.; resources, J.T.V.d.R. and P.R.D.-S.; data curation, J.T.V.d.R., P.R.D.-S. and S.R.R.; writing—original draft preparation, P.R.D.-S. and F.C.P.D.; writing—review and editing, J.T.V.d.R. and P.R.D.-S.; visualization, J.T.V.d.R., P.R.D.-S., F.C.P.D., R.B.d.L.-F., L.P. and G.C.G.; supervision, J.T.V.d.R. and P.R.D.-S.; project administration, J.T.V.d.R. and P.R.D.-S.; funding acquisition, J.T.V.d.R. and P.R.D.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Fundacão Araucária de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Estado do Paraná and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (Program for Centers of Excellence in Research—PRONEX) grant number 117/18-50, 469/18; and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, CAPES, grant number 001.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Askari-khorasgani, O.; Pessarakli, M. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) culture in vermi-aquaponic systems: II. Strategies for sustainable and economic development: Fertilization practices in vermi-ponic unit. J. Plant Nutr. 2020, 43, 1726–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mehta, K.; Rajesh, K.T.; Guleria, J.S. Socio-economic impact of protected cultivation on tomato growers of Himachal Pradesh. Econ. Aff. 2020, 65, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rahman, M.S.; Manjira, S.; Majumder, M.K.; Rahman, S. Socio-economic determinants of off-season summer tomato cultivation. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 2020, 27, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wohner, B.; Gabriel, V.H.; Krenn, B.; Krauter, V.; Tacker, M. Environmental and economic assessment of food-packaging systems with a focus on food waste. Case study on tomato ketchup. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 738, 139–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yao, Q.; Peng, Z.; Tong, H.; Yng, F.; Xing, G.; Wang, L.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, Y.; Su, Q. Tomato plant flavonoids increase whitefly resistance and reduce spread of Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus. J. Econ. Entomol. 2019, 112, 2790–2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dias, D.M.; Resende, J.T.V.; Zeist, A.R.; Gabriel, A.; Santos, M.H.; Vilela, N.C. Resistance of processing tomato genotypes to leafminer (Tuta absoluta). Hortic. Bras. 2019, 37, 1040–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Vidyarthi, S.; Simmons, C. Characterization and management strategies for process discharge streams in California industrial tomato processing. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 723, 137976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. FAO. Food and Agriculture Data: Production: Crops. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (accessed on 15 March 2021).
  9. Mkonyi, L.; Rubanga, D.; Richard, M.; Zekeya, N.; Sawahiko, S.; Maiseli, B.; Machuve, D. Early identification of Tuta absoluta in tomato plants using deep learning. Sci. Afr. 2020, 10, e00590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Johnston, N.; Martini, X. The influence of visual and olfactory cues in host selection for Bemisia tabaci Biotype B in the presence or absence of Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus. Insects 2020, 2, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Soares, M.A.; Carvalho, G.A.; Campos, M.R.; Passos, L.C.; Haro, M.M.; Lavoir, A.V.; Desneux, N. Detrimental sublethal effects hamper the effective use of natural and chemical pesticides in combination with a key natural enemy of Bemisia tabaci on tomato. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 3551–3559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tarusikirwa, V.L.; Mutamiswa, R.; English, S.; Chidawanyika, F.; Nyamukondiwa, C. Thermal plasticity in the invasive south American tomato pinworm Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). J. Biol. 2020, 20, 102598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, G.F.; Wang, Y.S.; Gao, Y.H.; Liu, W.X.; Zhang, R.; Fu, W.J.; Wan, F.H. First report of the South American tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick), in China. J. Integr. Agric. 2020, 19, 1912–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pulga, P.S.; Henshel, J.M.; Resende, J.T.V.; Zeist, A.R.; Moreira, A.F.P.; Gabriel, A.; Gonçalves, L.S.A. Salicylic acid treatments induce resistance to Tuta absoluta and Tetranychus urticae on tomato plants. Hortic. Bras. 2020, 38, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tiftikçi, P.; Kök, Ş.; Kasap, I. Biological control of twospotted spider mites [Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae)] using Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseidae) at different ratios of release on field-grown tomatos. Biol. Control 2020, 151, 104404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, J.; Wang, X. Tomato diseases and pests detection based on improved yolo v3 convolutional neural network. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mulugeta, T.; Muhinyuza, J.B.; Gouws-Meyer, R.; Matsaunyane, L.; Andreasson, E.; Alexandersson, E. Botanicals and plant strengtheners for potato and tomato cultivation in Africa. J. Integr. Agric. 2020, 19, 406–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ye, L.; Zhao, X.; Bao, E.; Li, J.; Zou, Z.; Cao, K. Bio-organic fertilizer with reduced rates of chemical fertilization improves soil fertility and enhances tomato yield and quality. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Knegt, B.; Meijer, T.T.; Kant, M.R.; Kiers, E.T.; Egas, M. Tetranychus evansi spider mite populations suppress tomato defenses to varying degrees. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 4375–4390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Sene, S.O.; Tendeng, E.; Diatte, M.; Sylla, S.; Labou, B.; Diallo, A.W.; Diarra, K. Insecticide resistance in field populations of the tomato fruitworm, Helicoverpa armigera, from Senegal. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2020, 14, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Oliveira, J.R.F.; Resende, J.T.V.D.; Roberto, S.R.; Da-Silva, P.R.; Rech, C.; Nardi, C. Tomato Breeding for Sustainable Crop Systems: High Levels of Zingiberene Providing Resistance to Multiple Arthropods. Horticulturae 2020, 6, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dutta, P.; Hazari, S.; Karak, C.; Talukdar, S. Study on genetic variability of different tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cultivars grown under open field condition. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2018, 6, 1706–1709. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dawood, M.H.; Snyder, J.C. The alcohol and epoxy alcohol of zingiberene, produced in trichomes of wild tomato, are more repellent to spider mites than zingiberene. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 21, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Ghani, M.A.; Abbas, M.M.; Amjad, M.; Ziaf, K.; Ali, B.; Shaheen, T.; Awan, F.S.; Khan, A.N. Production and characterisation of tomato derived from interspecific hybridisation between cultivated tomato and its wild relatives. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2020, 95, 506–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zörb, C.; Piepho, H.P.; Zikeli, S.; Horneburg, B. Heritability and variability of quality parameters of tomatoes in outdoor production. Research 2020, 2020, 6707529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Resende, N.C.V.; Silva, A.A.; Maluf, W.R.; Resende, J.T.V.; Zeist, A.R.; Gabriel, A. Selection of lines and populations of tomato for fruit shape and resistance to tomato leafminer. Hortic. Bras. 2020, 38, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Muigai, S.G.; Basset, M.J.; Schuster, D.J.; Scott, J.W. Greenhouse and field screening of wild Lycopersicon germplasm for resistance to the whitefly Bemisia argentifolii. Phytoparasitica 2003, 31, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Oliveira, C.M.; Andrade Júnior, V.C.; Maluf, W.R.; Neiva, I.P.; Maciel, G.M. Resistance of tomato strains to the moth Tuta absoluta imparted by allelochemicals and trichome density. Ciênc. Agrotecnol. 2012, 36, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rakha, M.; Zekeya, N.; Sevgan, S.; Musembi, M.; Ramasamy, S.; Hanson, P. Screening recently identified whitefly/spider mite-resistant wild tomato accessions for resistance to Tuta absoluta. Plant Breed 2017, 136, 562–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zanin, D.S.; Resende, J.T.V.; Zeist, A.R.; Oliveira, J.R.; Henschel, J.M.; Lima Filho, R.B. Selection of processing tomato genotypes resistant to two spotted spider mite. Hortic. Bras. 2018, 36, 253258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Marchant, W.G.; Legarrea, S.; Smeda, J.R.; Mutschler, M.A.; Srinivasa, N.R. Evaluating acylsugars-mediated resistance in tomato against Bemisia tabaci and transmission of Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus. Insects 2020, 11, 842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Santos, N.C.; Marquez, G.R.; Maciel, G.M.; Pereira, L.M.; Peres, H.G.; Peixoto, J.V.M. Resistance of round tomato genotypes wifh determinate growth habit to two-spotted spider mites and silverleaf whitefly. Bioagro 2020, 32, 15–22. [Google Scholar]
  33. Oliveira, J.R.F.; Resende, J.T.V.; Maluf, W.R.; Lucini, T.; Lima-Filho, R.B.; Lima, I.P.; Nardi, C. Trichomes and allelochemicals in tomato genotypes have antagonistic effects upon behavior and biology of Tetranychus urticae. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Maruyama, W.I.; Toscano, L.C.; Boiça Júnior, A.L.; Barbosa, J.C. Resistance of tomato genotypes to spider mite. Hortic. Bras. 2002, 20, 480–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Suinaga, F.A.; Picanço, M.C.; Moreira, M.D.; Semeão, A.A.; Magalhães, S.T.V. Antibiosis resistance of Lycopersicon peruvianum to tomato leafminer. Hortic. Bras. 2004, 22, 281–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Gonçalves Neto, A.C.; Silva, V.F.; Maluf, W.R.; Maciel, G.M.; Nizio, D.A.C.; Gomes, L.A.A.; Azevedo, S.M. Resistance to the South American tomato pinworm in tomato plants with high foliar acylsugar contentes. Hortic. Bras. 2010, 28, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Maciel, G.M.; Maluf, W.R.; Silva, V.F.; Gonçalves Neto, A.C.; Gomes, L.A.A. Pre-commercial hybrids obtained from an acylsugar-rich tomato inbred line, resistant to Tuta absoluta. Hortic. Bras. 2011, 29, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Albaladejo, I.; Meco, V.; Plasencia, F.; Flores, F.B.; Bolarin, M.C.; Egea, I. Unravelling the strategies used by the wild tomato species Solanum pennellii to confront salt stress: From leaf anatomical adaptations to molecular responses. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2017, 135, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yan, Z.; Pérez De Castro, A.; Díez, M.J.; Hutton, S.F.; Visser, R.G.; Wolters, A.M.A.; Li, J. Resistance to Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus in tomato germplasm. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sade, D.; Sade, N.; Brotman, Y.; Czosnek, H. Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV)-resistant tomatoes share molecular mechanisms sustaining resistance with their wild progenitor Solanum habrochaites but not with TYLCV-susceptible tomatoes. Plant Sci. 2020, 295, 110439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Iftekharuddaula, K.M.; Newaz, M.A.; Salam, M.A. Rapid and high-precision marker assisted backcrossing to introgress the SUB1 QTL into BR11, the rainfed lowland rice mega variety of Bangladesh. Euphytica 2011, 178, 83–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ellur, R.K.; Khanna, A.; Yadav, A.; Pathania, S.; Rajashekara, H.; Singh, V.K.; Gopala Krishnan, S.; Bhowmick, P.K.; Nagarajan, M.; Vinod, K.K.; et al. Improvement of Basmati rice varieties for resistance to blast and bacterial blight diseases using marker assisted backcross breeding. Plant Sci. 2016, 242, 330–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Lee, T.G.; Shekasteband, R.; Menda, N.; Mueller, L.A.; Hutton, S.F. Molecular markers to select for the j-2–mediated jointless pedicel in tomato. HortScience 2018, 53, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lima, I.P.; Resende, J.T.V.; Oliveira, J.R.F.; Faria, M.V.; Resende, N.C.V.; Lima Filho, R.B. Indirect selection of industrial tomato genotypes rich in zingiberene and resistant to Tuta absoluta Meyrick. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015, 14, 15081–15089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Freitas, J.A.; Maluf, W.R.; Cardoso, M.D.G.; Oliveira, A.C.B.D.; Seleção, D.E. Plantas de tomateiro visando à resistência à artrópodes-praga mediada por zingibereno. Acta Sci. 2000, 22, 919–923. [Google Scholar]
  46. Luckwill, L.C. The Genus Lycopersicon: An Historical, Biological, and Taxonomic Survey of the Wild and Cultivated Tomatoes; Aberdeen University Press: Aberdeen, UK, 1943. [Google Scholar]
  47. Labory, C.R.G.; Santa Cecília, L.V.C.; Maluf, W.R.; Cardoso, M.G.; Bearzotti, E.; Souza, J.C. Indirect selection to 2-tridecanone content and its relation to tomato pinworm resistance. Pesqui. Agropecuária Bras. 1999, 34, 733–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Weston, P.A.; Snyder, J.C. Thumb tack bioassay: A quick method of measuring plant resistance to two spotted spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 1990, 83, 500–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sharma, K.; Ajay, K.M.; Raj, S.M. A simple and efficient method for extraction of genomic DNA from tropical tuber crops. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 7, 1018–1022. [Google Scholar]
  50. Rohlf, F.J. NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy System; Version 2.2; Exeter Software: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  51. Suinaga, F.A.; Casali, V.W.D.; Silva, D.J.H.; Picanço, M.C. Genetic dissimilarity among soucers of resistance of Lycopersicon spp. To Tuta absoluta (Meyrick, 1917) (Lepidoptera: Gelechidae). R. Bras. Agrociência 2003, 9, 371–376. [Google Scholar]
  52. Al-Bayati, A.S. Breeding for Tomato Resistance to Spider Mite Tetranychus Urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae); University of Kentucky: Lexington, KY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  53. Freitas, J.A.; Maluf, W.R.; Cardoso, M.G.; Gomes, L.A.A.; Bearzotti, E. Inheritance of foliar zingiberene contents and their relationship to trichome densities and whitefly resistance in tomatoes. Euphytica 2002, 127, 275–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Maluf, W.R.; De Fátima Silva, V.; Das Graças Cardoso, M.; Gomes, L.A.A.; Neto, A.C.G.; Maciel, G.M.; Nízio, D.A.C. Resistance to the South American tomato pinworm Tuta absoluta in high acylsugar and/or high zingiberene tomato genotypes. Euphytica 2010, 176, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Oriani, M.A.D.G.; Vendramim, J.D.; Vasconcelos, C.J. Biology of Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) B biotype (Hemiptera, Aleyrodidae) on tomato genotypes. Sci. Agric. 2011, 68, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Neiva, I.P.; Andrade Júnior, V.C.; Maluf, W.R.; Oliveira, C.M.; Maciel, G.M. Role of allelochemicals and trichome density in the Resistance of tomato to whitefly. Ciênc. Agrotecnol. 2013, 37, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Boiça Júnior, A.L.; Bottega, D.B.; Lourenção, A.L.; Rodrigues, N.E.L. Resistance in tomato genotypes to attack of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick, 1917) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae): Non-preference for oviposition and feeding. Arq. Inst. Biol. 2012, 14, 541–548. [Google Scholar]
  58. Bitew, M.K. Significant role of wild genotypes of tomato trichomes for Tuta absoluta resistance. J. Plant Genet. Breed. 2018, 2, 104. [Google Scholar]
  59. Zanin, D.S.; Resende, J.T.V.; Zeist, A.R.; Lima Filho, R.B.; Gabriel, A.; Diniz, F.C.P.; Perrud, A.C.; Morales, R.G.F. Selection of F2BC1 tomato genotypes for processing containing high levels of zingiberene and resistant to tomato pinworms. Phytoparasitica 2021, 49, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Antonious, G.F.; Snyder, J.C. Natural products: Repellency and toxicity of wild tomato leaf extracts to the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 2006, 41, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lima, I.P.; Resende, J.T.V.D.; Oliveira, J.R.; Faria, M.V.; Dias, D.M.; Resende, N.C. Selection of tomato genotypes for processing with high zingiberene content, resistant to pests. Hortic Bras 2016, 34, 387–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lawson, D.M.; Lunde, C.F.; Mutschler, M.A. Marker-assisted transfer of acylsugar-mediated pest resistance from the wild tomato, Lycopersicon pennellii, to the cultivated tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum. Mol. Breed. 1997, 3, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Foolad, M.R.; Panthee, D.R. Marker-assisted selection in tomato breeding. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2012, 31, 93–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Horticulturae 08 01217 g001 550
Figure 1. Crossing and backcrossing stages used in the program to select pest tolerant genotypes with high zingiberene content [21,30,44].
Figure 1. Crossing and backcrossing stages used in the program to select pest tolerant genotypes with high zingiberene content [21,30,44].
Horticulturae 08 01217 g001
Horticulturae 08 01217 g002 550
Figure 2. Type IV (a,b) and type VI (c,d) glandular trichomes present in leaflets of tomato genotypes with high zingiberene contents.
Figure 2. Type IV (a,b) and type VI (c,d) glandular trichomes present in leaflets of tomato genotypes with high zingiberene contents.
Horticulturae 08 01217 g002
Horticulturae 08 01217 g003 550
Figure 3. Level of adult whitefly infestation in genotypes selected for contrasting levels of zingiberene. (a) refers to the genotype RVTZpl#125 with low content of the allelochemical, and (b) refers the genotype RVTZpl#348 with high content of the allelochemical.
Figure 3. Level of adult whitefly infestation in genotypes selected for contrasting levels of zingiberene. (a) refers to the genotype RVTZpl#125 with low content of the allelochemical, and (b) refers the genotype RVTZpl#348 with high content of the allelochemical.
Horticulturae 08 01217 g003
Horticulturae 08 01217 g004 550
Figure 4. Level of damage caused by tomato moth on low zingiberene (RVTZpl#125) and high (RVTZpl#348) tomato genotypes selected from BC3F2 backcross.
Figure 4. Level of damage caused by tomato moth on low zingiberene (RVTZpl#125) and high (RVTZpl#348) tomato genotypes selected from BC3F2 backcross.
Horticulturae 08 01217 g004
Table
Table 1. Inter-simple sequence-repeat (ISSR) primers used to identify BC3F2 genotypes with higher recurrent genome recovery. AT °C, annealing temperature.
Table 1. Inter-simple sequence-repeat (ISSR) primers used to identify BC3F2 genotypes with higher recurrent genome recovery. AT °C, annealing temperature.
PrimerSequence * (5′–3′)AT °C
UBC-807(AG)8T52
UBC-808(AG)8C50
UBC-809(AG)8G55
UBC-810(GA)8T52
UBC-811(GA)8C52
UBC-815(CT)8G52
UBC-827(AC)8G53
UBC-835(AG)8YC52
UBC-836(AG)8YA53
UBC-848(CA)8AGG55
* Y = (C, T).
Table
Table 2. Correlation between zingiberene (ZGB) concentration and type and amount of trichomes with intensity of infestation by Bemisia tabaci, Tuta absoluta, and Tetranychus urticae in BC3F2 tomato genotypes obtained from a cross between Solanum lycopersicum cv. Redeção (used as the default susceptibility genotype) and Solanum habrochaites var. hirsutum (PI127826) (used as the default resistance genotype). SGB Abs—Zingiberene absorbance at 270 nm; GT IV—type IV glandular trichomes; GT VI—type VI glandular trichomes; NGT—non-glandular trichomes; DT—Distance traveled in millimeters; AB—abaxial face of the leaflet; AD—adaxial face of the leaflet; DAI—days after infestation.
Table 2. Correlation between zingiberene (ZGB) concentration and type and amount of trichomes with intensity of infestation by Bemisia tabaci, Tuta absoluta, and Tetranychus urticae in BC3F2 tomato genotypes obtained from a cross between Solanum lycopersicum cv. Redeção (used as the default susceptibility genotype) and Solanum habrochaites var. hirsutum (PI127826) (used as the default resistance genotype). SGB Abs—Zingiberene absorbance at 270 nm; GT IV—type IV glandular trichomes; GT VI—type VI glandular trichomes; NGT—non-glandular trichomes; DT—Distance traveled in millimeters; AB—abaxial face of the leaflet; AD—adaxial face of the leaflet; DAI—days after infestation.
TrichomesB. tabaciT. absolutaT. urticae
ZGB Abs &GT IV &GT VI &NGT &Number of Eggs &Number of Nymphs &Lesions &DT &
Genotype ABADAB ADAB AD21 DAI21 DAI21 DAI60 min
S. habrochaites var. hirsutum0.31 a5.00 a2.00 a0.00 e47.00 a0.00 c21.50 a4.75 h2.00 e1.60 d2.21 e
RVTZ pl#344 (high ZGB)0.19 abc1.00 c0.50 bc4.50 a1.50 ab30.00 bc20.50 a30.25 e6.00 cd2.26 bcd7.49 de
RVTZ pl#346 (high ZGB)0.17 abc1.25 bc0.75 abc1.00 cde0.75 abc20.00 cdefg12.00 cde20.75 f4.00 de1.70 d10.52 cd
RVTZ pl#348 (high ZGB)0.26 ab3.75 ab1.50 ab3.00 ab2.00 a12.25 g12.50 cde12.75 g4.00 de2.20 bcd8.01 d
RVTZ pl#361 (high ZGB)0.22 abc0.75 c0.25 bc2.75 abc1.25 ab24.00 cdef14.75 bc16.25 fg5.25 cd2.23 cd12.24 bcd
RVTZ pl#448 (high ZGB)0.18 abc250 abc1.00 abc2.25 bcd1.25 ab22.25 cdefg12.50 cde33.75 e5.75 cd2.18 cd11.58 abcd
S. lycopersicum cv. Redenção0.06 bc1.00 c0.50 bc0.75 de0.50 abc26.25 bcde14.75 bc153.50 a25.00 b4.15 a19.52 ab
RVTZ pl#125 (low ZGB)0.05 c0.50 a0.25 bc0.25 e0.50 abc14.25 fg10.25 cde128.75 b47.50 a3.90 ab16.19 abc
RVTZ pl#126 (low ZGB)0.04 c0.25 c0.00 c0.50 de0.25 bc37.00 ab17.75 ab141.75 ab29.00 b3.65 ab21.26 a
RVTZ pl#128 (low ZGB)0.05 c0.50 c0.00 c0.75 de0.25 bc22.25 cdefg8.00 e106.50 c25.50 b4.40 a20.21 ab
Pearson correlation (r)
ZGB -0.72 *0.73 *0.32 ns0.33 ns0.06 ns0.31 ns−0.91 *−0.87 *−0.91 *−0.94 *
GT IV AB leaflet side0.72 *------−0.58 *−0.51 ns−0.54 *−0.78 *
GT IV AD leaflet side0.73 *------−0.60 *−0.53*−0.59 *−0.83 *
GT VI AB leaflet side0.32 ns------−0.46 ns−0.42 ns−0.32 ns−0.37 ns
GT VI AD leaflet side0.33 ns------−0.50 ns−0.39 ns−0.34 ns−0.37 ns
NGT AB leaflet side0.06 ns------0.05 ns−0.05 ns−0.03 ns−0.22 ns
NGT AD leaflet side0.31 ns------−0.21 ns−0.25 ns−0.30 ns−0.50 ns
& Means followed by the same letter in the column do not differ by Tukey’s test (p > 0.05); * Significant at 5% level; ns: Not significant; -: Not evaluated.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Panizzon Diniz, F.C.; Vilela de Resende, J.T.; Lima-Filho, R.B.d.; Pilati, L.; Gomes, G.C.; Roberto, S.R.; Da-Silva, P.R. Development of BC3F2 Tomato Genotypes with Arthropod Resistance Introgressed from Solanum habrochaites var. hirsutum (PI127826). Horticulturae 2022, 8, 1217. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8121217

AMA Style

Panizzon Diniz FC, Vilela de Resende JT, Lima-Filho RBd, Pilati L, Gomes GC, Roberto SR, Da-Silva PR. Development of BC3F2 Tomato Genotypes with Arthropod Resistance Introgressed from Solanum habrochaites var. hirsutum (PI127826). Horticulturae. 2022; 8(12):1217. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8121217

Chicago/Turabian Style

Panizzon Diniz, Flávia Cristina, Juliano Tadeu Vilela de Resende, Renato Barros de Lima-Filho, Laura Pilati, Gabriella Correia Gomes, Sergio Ruffo Roberto, and Paulo Roberto Da-Silva. 2022. "Development of BC3F2 Tomato Genotypes with Arthropod Resistance Introgressed from Solanum habrochaites var. hirsutum (PI127826)" Horticulturae 8, no. 12: 1217. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8121217

APA Style

Panizzon Diniz, F. C., Vilela de Resende, J. T., Lima-Filho, R. B. d., Pilati, L., Gomes, G. C., Roberto, S. R., & Da-Silva, P. R. (2022). Development of BC3F2 Tomato Genotypes with Arthropod Resistance Introgressed from Solanum habrochaites var. hirsutum (PI127826). Horticulturae, 8(12), 1217. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8121217

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop