Next Article in Journal
Protein Hydrolysate Combined with Hydroponics Divergently Modifies Growth and Shuffles Pigments and Free Amino Acids of Carrot and Dill Microgreens
Next Article in Special Issue
Advances in Genetics and Molecular Breeding of Broccoli
Previous Article in Journal
Advances and Challenges in RNA Interference Technology for Citrus Huanglongbing Vector Control
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification of Major Loci and Candidate Genes for Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in Broccoli Using QTL-Seq
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research Advances in Allelopathy of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) of Plants

1
Tropical Crops Genetic Resources Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
2
College of Horticulture, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2021, 7(9), 278; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7090278
Submission received: 4 June 2021 / Revised: 27 August 2021 / Accepted: 30 August 2021 / Published: 2 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Molecular Breeding of Vegetable Crops)

Abstract

:
Allelopathy is an ecological phenomenon in which organisms interfere with each other. As a management strategy in agricultural systems, allelopathy can be mainly used to control weeds, resist pests, and disease and improve the interaction of soil nutrition and microorganisms. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are allelochemicals volatilized from plants and have been widely demonstrated to have different ecological functions. This review provides the recent advance in the allelopathic effects of VOCs on plants, such as growth, competition, dormancy, resistance of diseases and insect pests, content of reactive oxygen species (ROS), enzyme activity, respiration, and photosynthesis. VOCs also participate in plant-to-plant communication as a signaling substance. The main methods of collection and identification of VOCs are briefly summarized in this article. It also points out the disadvantages of VOCs and suggests potential directions to enhance research and solve mysteries in this emerging area. It is necessary to study the allelopathic mechanisms of plant VOCs so as to provide a theoretical basis for VOC applications. In conclusion, allelopathy of VOCs released by plants is a more economical, environmentally friendly, and effective measure to develop substantial agricultural industry by using the allelopathic effects of plant natural products.

1. Introduction

The concept of “allelopathy” was first proposed by Austrian scientist Hans Molisch in 1937 and mainly referred to the chemical relationship of plant interaction. Allelopathy is an ecological phenomenon and plays an important role in the ecological adaptation of plants [1,2]. The allelopathic effects have both positive and negative effects. Various studies have reported the advantages of allelopathic effects in agricultural systems, such as weed control [3,4,5,6], inhibition of pests [7,8,9,10], disease [11,12], improvement of soil nutrition [13,14], and microbial interactions [15,16]. Ultimately, allelopathy of most plants has effect on plant growth [10,17,18]. Plants can synthesize various secondary metabolites during growth and development. Plant VOCs vary by species, and they are related to the abundance of neighboring plant species and plant species composition [19,20]. These secondary metabolites can be beneficial or harmful to other organisms when stored or released into the environment, such as secondary metabolites stored in plants that can prevent animal feeding and microbial infestation, while volatiles released into the air can attract insect pollinators [21]. Plants communicate with organisms in the environment through VOCs, thereby achieving a wide range of ecological functions, such as affecting their growth, development, defense, reproduction, and life cycle [22]. In 1984, allelopathy was defined as “any direct or indirect harmful effect by one plant (including microorganisms) on another through production of chemical compounds released into the environment” by Rice [23]. These products of secondary metabolism, called allelochemicals, can be found in any organ of the plant (leaves, stems, flowers, seeds, fruits, and/or roots) and can be released from the producing plant by different routes: volatilization, foliar leaching, root exudations, and decomposition of plant residue (Figure 1).
VOCs are secondary metabolites volatilized by plants and ubiquitous allelochemicals of plants [24]. Shikimate/phenylalanine, the mevalonic acid (MVA), the methylerythritol phosphate (MEP), and lipoxygenase (LOX) pathways are the four main synthesis pathways of VOCs, and plants can synthesize and release various VOCs including terpenoids, phenylpropanoids/benzenoids, and fatty acid derivatives [25]. The VOCs released by these plants often have different ecological functions, such as chemical communication, kin recognition, attracting or repelling insects, and many other effects [21,26,27,28,29]. Although the researches of plants VOCs are mainly aboveground some chemical signal, more and more studies show that VOCs also play an integral part in belowground plant–plant interactions [30]. In fact, the phenomenon that plants release allelochemicals through the volatile pathway has been noticed for a long time. One of the first empirical studies of allelopathy involving VOCs was researched by Molisch, who found that VOCs released by apples and pears could inhibit potato germination [31]. VOCs have been widely demonstrated to defend primarily against herbivorous insects [32,33], microbes, and pathogens [34,35,36], thereby reducing extreme environmental stress [37,38] and promoting nutritional acquisition [11]. Muller et al. [39] researched the volatiles of annual grassland species in Salvia leucophylla Greene and Artemisia californica communities, and this revealed that volatile allelochemicals had the interspecific allelopathic effects on the woody herbaceous plants, which would negatively affected the recipient plant species [40,41] and changed soil microorganisms [42,43]. Besides, in addition to VOCs released from plant shoots, root volatiles may also have allelopathic effects on neighboring plants; for example, VOCs from big sagebrush (Artemisia tidentata Nutt.) root inhibited seed germination of wild tobacco (Nicotiana attenuata) [44]. Most allelochemicals produced by plant roots are considered as “root exudates” [45], but the few allelochemicals released by volatilization of roots are called VOCs, which play an important ecological role in the soil ecosystem and have not been studied thoroughly [46,47].
Allelopathy has received high attention and become one of the central scientific problems in ecology [48]. Allelopathy is forming an independent scientific system, and we are conducting in-depth and extensive research from both theoretical and practical aspects. VOCs released by plants are one of the main ways to achieve allelopathic effects. It is a more economical, environmentally friendly, and effective measure to use the allelopathic effect of plant natural products to develop the agricultural production [49]. Several excellent reviews have summarized the relevant research on potential applications of VOCs [20,22,49], but the studies on allelopathy of plants VOCs have not been systematically reviewed and reported. VOCs are a kind of natural and environmentally friendly chemical substances that volatilize from plants and are used as natural herbicides and fungicides to protect neighboring plants from stress and increase crop yields [49]. We think VOCs have a much broader range of the potential applications. So, in this context, study on the allelopathy of VOCs is particularly important to the future development of green agriculture. The review mainly focuses on the recent studies of allelopathy of plants VOCs, regarding resisting diseases and preventing pests of plant, impacting on competition (inhibiting weed hazards), breaking dormancy, regulating plant growth, affecting reactive oxygen species (ROS) content and enzyme activity, modulating plant respiration and photosynthesis, and their role as a signal conducting substance. We present the evidence from the references to illustrate these roles to deepen the understanding of allelopathy of plants VOCs.

2. Allelopathy of VOCs of Plants

With the increasing attention of experts on the allelopathy of volatile, the potential role of VOCs in agriculture has been gradually discovered. The allelopathy of VOCs on plants are summarized based on existing research, which involved the main allelopathy of plant VOCs. (Figure 2).

2.1. VOCs and Plants Growth

Numerous results showed that VOCs have an effect on plant cell growth and differentiation [50,51,52,53], such as diallyl disulfide (DADS) of garlic VOCs, which can affect mitotic activity and cell length of tomato roots by impacting on cell division, endogenous plant hormone levels, expansin gene expression, and sulfate assimilation and glutathione (GSH) metabolism [53,54].
Similarly, many studies confirm that plant volatiles can inhibit seed germination and the growth of root and seedling [50,55,56,57,58,59,60]. β-terpineol, linalool, eugenol, and tetradecanoic acid are the VOCs released from tomato (Solanum lycopersicon Mill.) foliage, and they could inhibit seed germination of the tropical plant Amaranthus mangostanus L. [55]. The brassica species exude allelochemicals, which are glucosinolates [61] that could break down into several biological action compounds, such as isothiocyanates, which have biologically active and inhibit germination and growth of exposed plant species [57,62]. VOCs released from pine needles and the roots of Pinus halepensis L. mainly inhibited the seed germination and root growth of two herbaceous target species Lactuca sativa L. and Linum strictum L. [63]. VOCs affect plant growth, mainly to change plant morphology and reduce plant biomass. Therefore, seed germination, seedling root length, and seedling height are often used as intuitive indicators to evaluate allelopathy. Low concentrations of DADS promoted the growth of cucumber roots and induce elongation of the main roots by up-regulating the expression of CsCDKA and CsCDKB genes and regulating the hormone balance of the roots [64]. The VOCs released by Atriplex cana Ledeb. (Amaranthaceae) significantly inhibited seedling growth of Amaranthus retroflexus L. and Poa annua L., and 5 µg/mL essential oil completely inhibited the seed germination of A. retroflexus, Medicago sativa L., P. annua, and Echinochloa crusgalli L. [65]. Besides, Effah et al. found that plant VOCs mediate multiple ecological networks, and they may mediate the allelopathic effects of the germination or growth of competitors seeds [66]. Monoterpenoids are considered as effective inhibitors of seed germination and seedling growth [67,68].
VOCs affect plant growth, mainly to inhibit plant growth, but some studies have found that VOCs have dual effects on germination and plant growth, both promoting and inhibiting; for example, Arroyo et al. found that volatile chemicals from Artemisia herba-alba Asso. inhibited the germination of Pinus halepensis Mill. seeds, promoted the growth of P. halepensis seedlings, and reduced the root biomass of Salsola vermiculata L. seedlings [69]. VOCs also have an effect on plants growth direction. Runyon et al. found that Cuscuta pentagona seedlings were favored by not only the growth of host tomato plants, but also the direction of tomato VOCs [70]. The extracted VOCs of tomato and wheat were placed on both sides of C. pentagona seedlings, and the C. pentagona seedlings continued to grow in the direction of tomato VOCs. It was also found that β-phellandrene and β-myrcene of tomato VOCs could significantly attract the growth of C. pentagona seedlings.

2.2. VOCs and Weed Control

Allelopathy gain extensive attention in biological weed control [3,4,5,6,71]. Boydston et al. [3] found that mustard seed meal has the potential for weed control in organic production systems. The release of volatile organic compounds from the leaves can cause allelopathic effects and damage the growth of other competitive plants [72]. The allelopathy of the volatile allelochemicals may perform a vital part in inhibiting the competitive ability of weed species, be one of the alternatives to control weed infestation, and it has excited the greatest interest [67,73,74,75]. Therefore, the best way to control weeds is to use the crops’ own competition and allelopathy. Wei et al. reported that the volatile oil released by Atriplex cana Ledeb. significantly inhibited the growth of seedlings of four weed species, including Amaranthus retroflexus L. and Poa annua L., and it had a high value for further use as a biological herbicide [65].
Brassicas produce the allelochemicals glucosinolates throughout their plant parts and released them into the environment by volatilization [76]. In the natural environment, glucosinolates are broken down into several compounds, and the most important compound of them is isothiocyanate [77], which can inhibit the growth and development of plant or weed [78]. Digitaria sanguinalis is a common non-irrigated weed that severely affects crop yields. Pardo-Muras et al. showed that the oxygenated monoterpenes in VOCs produced and released by both Ulex europaeus and Cytisus scoparius inhibited the germination and early growth of two weeds, A. retroflexus and D. sanguinalis [79]. Many studies have reported that in addition to independent effects of VOCs, VOCs also have synergistic or antagonistic effects. These synergistic and antagonistic effects lead to the final allelopathy [80,81].
Besides, VOCs from invasive species can also reduce interspecific performance and improve the performance of invasive species [82]. VOCs might also be perceived by neighboring plants to adjust their defensive phenotype according to the present risk of attack. Allelochemicals as natural herbicide have an attractive prospect, and some plants may be expected to develop into a new generation of herbicides or fungicides.

2.3. VOCs and Plants Dormancy

Dormancy is a physiological state in which plants respond to stress [83]. DADS is considered as main allelochemical of VOCs in garlic [53]. Hosoki et al. reported that the sulfur-containing compounds from garlic VOCs could break the bud dormancy in some corms, tubers, and ornamental trees [84,85]. Kubota et al. found that exposure to volatile diallyl disulfides and trisulfides was the most effective treatment to promote the bud break of single-bud cuttings of “Kyoho” (Vitis vinifera × labruscana Bailey) [86]. So, the allelochemicals in garlic that break the dormancy of vine buds are sulfur compounds, particularly DADS. In addition to DADS, more and more studies can prove that VOCs can affect plant dormancy. In a recent study, Shukla et al. studied the breaking dormancy of potato tubers effects on 20 essential oils from medicinal and aromatic plants [87]. The essential oils could induce or inhibit the sprouting process of potato tubers by altering the accumulation of reducing sugars, ethylene production, and expression of genes, thereby affecting the dormancy of plants [87]. Besides, eugenol from clove essential oil and carvone from caraway and dill essential oils have been reported to inhibit potato tubers sprouting [88,89,90]. The results showed that the essential oils of lemon grass and clove were the most effective VOCs for breaking dormancy and inducing germination of potato tubers. The oils of palmarosa and ajwain inhibited the sprout of potato tubers [87]. Owolabi et al. found the essential oils of Lippia multiflora, Cymbopogon citratus, and Zingiber officinale could control potato tubers dormancy [91]. They are suitable for application as sprout suppressants. At present, there are few studies on the effects of VOCs on plant dormancy, and the specific mechanism of action needs to be studied in the future.

2.4. VOCs and the Inhibition of Plants Diseases and Insect Pests

2.4.1. Inhibition of Plants Disease

VOCs not only have an inhibitory effect on plants, but also on pathogenic bacteria. A number of experimental trials showed that leaves’ VOCs inhibited germination and the growth of plant pathogens and had stronger activity than commercial fungicides [92,93,94]. The essential oil of oregano triggers the expression of hundreds of genes involved in the grapevine immune system, so it can prevent Plasmopara viticola infection in grapevine (Vitis Vinifera) and primes plant immunity mechanisms [95]. The inhibition rate of volatile allelochemicals from leaves of Ocimum adscendens to 29 different kinds of mycelium was over 98%, and the inhibition rate of mycelium growth of Aspergillus reached 100%; especially, the activity of A. lavus was 10~100 times higher than another five commercial fungicides [96]. Chaturvedi et al. found that volatiles released by Adenocalymma allicea could effectively control leaf spot in rice and kill the pathogenic fungus Drechslera oryzae. When volatile oil obtained from A.alicea plants compared with the activity of the synthetic fungicides blitox-50 and m-45, the activity of volatile oil to D. oryzae was up to four times higher than those synthetic fungicides [97]. In particular, this volatile oil had no harmful effect on the growth and development of rice seedlings. The volatile oil released from the leaves of the same genus Ocimum basilicum also inhibited the growth of other fungal mycelia by more than 85%, and the dosage was only 1/4 of the commercial fungicide [98]. Therefore, using VOCs to replace commercial fungicide is no longer a dream. Phenols are a kind of allelochemicals that have been concerned and studied. Eugenol is an important class of phenolic allelochemicals. Cloves have a long history of use, and the main volatile component eugenol has a strong inhibitory effect on fungi and bacteria [99,100]. In a recent study, Quintana-Rodriguez et al. performed a screening on the efficacy of 22 VOCs, which were known to be volatilized from infected plants leaves, against the fungal pathogens Colletotrichum lindemuthianum, Fusarium oxysporum, and Botrytis cinerea. The work results showed that nonanal, (+)-carvone, citral, trans-2-decenal, L-linalool, nerolidol, and eugenol significantly inhibited the growth of the three fungal species, and eugenol had the most active among them. Therefore, the VOCs of plants have the disease resistance function [101].
In addition to eugenol, there are many VOCs that can also inhibit pathogens. DADS is a volatile organosulfur compound derived from garlic (Allium sativum L.) bulbs, and it is known as an allelochemical because of the potential allelopathy of garlic. A large number of study results show that it has a strong inhibitory effect on a variety of pathogenic bacteria [102]. In a recent study, Yang et al. demonstrated that the VOCs (DADS) from green garlic (Allium sativum L.) increased the accumulation of H2O2 and the disease resistance of cucumber [103]. Sekine et al. reported that other VOCs such as cuminaldehyde and p-cymene also have been demonstrated to possession antifungal activity against B. cinerea, F. oxysporum, Verticillium dahliae, and Alternaria mali [104]. According to the work of Mandal and Mandal, linalool, a substance with antifungal and antioxidant potential, was found in the volatile oil of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) [105].

2.4.2. Inhibition of Plants Insect Pests

Numerous studies showed that plants not only produce toxins and hormones directly in response to insect feeding, but also release VOCs to attract predators [106,107]. A class of VOCs produced as a response to herbivore attacking are mainly terpenoids, predominantly monoterpenoids, and sesquiterpenoids [107], and they benefited the host plant by interacting with herbivores. For example, when the larva of Spodoptera exigua Hübner. were feeding on corn, the corn released volatile terpenoids to attract the parasitic wasp, which was the natural enemy of S. exigua. If it was not mechanically damaged, the corn did not release VOCs to attract the natural enemy. Further studies found that the oral saliva of the beet moth contained volicitin, when the beet moth bit corn, its messenger jasmonic acid derivatives were activated by volicitin to release terpenoids to lure Cotesia marginiventris Cresson [108]. Kessler and Baldwin found that wild tobacco could release VOCs to attract mealoptera, the natural predators of caterpillars, when caterpillars ate them. Additionally, the VOCs released by wild tobacco also could prevent caterpillars from laying eggs on the leaves [21].
Under natural conditions, plants can also achieve effective control of related pests by releasing volatile substances to attract natural enemies. It is confirmed that the indirect chemical defense of plants by releasing VOCs to attract natural enemies is a chemical relationship in nature. Ageratum conyzoides L. released volatile terpenoid into the air by stalks, leaves, and flowers to attract predatory mites (Amblyseius SPP.) and maintain their population density [26]. Predatory mites are the most effective natural enemies of red mites (Panonychus citri). So, the population density of red mites was reduced [26]. Degenhardt et al. found that VOCs from corn root (E)-b-caryophyllene attracted insect-killing nematodes to control a major pest [109]. Therefore, the sustainable control of pests and diseases can be achieved through the natural chemical mechanisms that exist in the field to regulate plant–organism interactions. As a natural fungicide, VOCs have no harmful effect on plant growth and development, and using VOCs is a more environmentally friendly and economical way to kill bacteria.

2.5. VOCs and Plants Respiration and Photosynthesis

Previous studies showed that allelochemical can affect plant respiration by interfering in various stages of respiration, including the generation of carbon dioxide (CO2) by electron transport, oxidative phosphorylation, and the activity of ATPase, and it has the potential to inhibit plant growth and development [41,110,111]. VOCs released from the leaves of A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana and Sasa cernua Makino. inhibited the respiration of germinating seeds [110,112]. In fact, studies of allelopathy processes in shrubs in the 1960s found that volatile terpenes could reduce respiration in the young leaves of some plants and increase respiration in mature leaves [113]. Similarly, terpenes in eucalyptus volatile oil could affect target plants by inhibiting cellular respiration [114]. The influence mechanism of these allelochemicals on plant respiration deserves more in-depth study.
In addition, photosynthesis plays an important role in realizing the energy conversion in nature and maintains the carbon–oxygen balance in the atmosphere. The high concentration of allelochemicals involved in multiple metabolic steps may lead to the inhibition of plant photosynthesis, or even block the mechanism of photosynthesis by inhibiting electron receptors, energy coupling, or destroying photosynthetic pigments and enzymes [115]. Isoprene volatilized from the foliage of many woody species was thought to increase the rate of photosynthesis by stabilizing thylakoid membranes, so that adjacent plants could tolerate high temperatures [116]. Kaur et al. found the volatile oils α-Pinene and 1,8-cineole from Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm. could significantly reduce the respiration and photosynthetic pigment content of Amaranthus viridis Linn. Seedlings; thereby, the negative effects of the oil on photosynthetic machinery was explained [117]. These studies can confirm that olefin compounds can affect the photosynthesis of plants. In addition, Tsubo et al. found that exposure to low concentrations of the volatile chemicals released by A. adamsii Besser stimulated the photosynthetic rates of Stipa krilovii Roshev [118]. The volatile oil of Artemisia ordosica Krasch. inhibited the growth and photosynthesis of Palmellococcus miniatus through oxidative damage [119]. Zhao et al. studied the effects of eucalyptol and limonene, the main terpenoids in cyanobacteria VOCs on the photosynthetic capacity of Chlorella vulgaris [120]. The results showed that the compounds could induce the degradation of photosynthetic pigments and reduce the photosynthetic abilities of other algae. These studies can confirm that VOCs have the ability to affect plant photosynthesis.

2.6. VOCs and Plants ROS Content and Enzymatic Activity

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a vital role in the plant defense against stresses. The balance between ROS generation and scavenging is considered as paramount in cellular homeostasis. In recent years, more and more attention has been paid to the effectiveness and feasibility of monomer organic sulfide extracted from garlic as an anti-tumor drug, and the research and development of monomer organic sulfide has become an important research topic [121]. Similarly, DADS had an effect on the ROS content of plants. Yang et al. used cucumber and garlic as test materials to study the allelopathy of VOCs from green garlic on the scavenging of cucumber ROS [103]. The results showed that DADS, a volatile substance in garlic, reduced superoxide anions and increased hydrogen peroxide accumulation in cucumber seedlings. The effects of VOCs on antioxidant enzymatic activities were species dependent. They can regulate the activity of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, and POD) of cucumber seedlings in response to oxidative stress. VOCs released from Acacia dealbata Link. leaves increased the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) in L. multiflorum flowers, but decreased SOD activity in T. subterraneum [60]. The volatile allelochemical myrcene rapidly induced ROS production and significantly increased the activity of lipoxygenase (LOX) in rice roots [122]. In other cases, Mutlu et al. reported that the aerial parts of Nepeta meyeri Benth. contained two volatile oils, Germacrene-d and Caryophyllene oxide, and they could reduce the SOD activity of six weed species [123]. Jin et al. reported that the essential oil such as carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde, perillaldehyde, and linalool enhanced the SOD and POD activities of Chinese bayberries, and carvacrol had the best effect [124].

2.7. VOCs and Plants Signal Transduction

2.7.1. Chemical Communications

Plants, similar to animals, do not exist in isolation. Plant individuals and populations maintain population relationships and resist external stress through chemical communication. VOCs volatilized from some plants are involved in plant–plant communication. Through more than 20 years of research, it has been found that when plants were stressed by insect feeding, microbial infection, and mechanical damage, they could use volatile organic substances to carry out inter-chemical and intra-chemical chemical communication [125,126]. Plants sent VOCs signals under attack or stress, then neighboring plants received these VOCs signals directly or indirectly to turn on the chemical defense mechanisms and produce phenolic alkaloids chemical defense compounds including directly terpenoids and other defense substances. Indirect chemical defense the use of VOCs to attract the natural enemies of pests, through the methods of predation and parasitism to eliminate pests. For example, the VOCs signals released by injured A. tidentata could induce direct chemical defense by protease inhibitors in Nicotiana attenuate, and the VOC signals released by maize leaves when insects fed could induce plants to rapidly release monoterpenoids that attracted insect predators for indirect defense [127,128]. Wild lima bean quickly synthesized and secreted excess nectar to attract natural enemies after receiving VOC signals from plants that have been harmed by foraging [129]. In recent years, more and more research has gone deep into the mechanism of action of these chemical communication signaling molecules. Baldwin et al. [125] found when in response to the attack, infested leaves released (E)-β-ocimene (typical signaling chemicals of volatile terpenoids) to increase the resistance of un-infested leaves and induce the expression of defense-related genes in neighboring un-infected leaves [130]. In future research, based on the clarification of the biochemical and metabolic processes of the phytochemical signal substances that have been discovered, the response mechanism of the recipient plants to these signal substances should be further explored. Therefore, although the research of phytochemical communication faces huge challenges, the clarification of phytochemical identification and communication relationships will broaden the horizons of the interspecific and intraspecific relationships of plants.

2.7.2. Plant Kin Recognition

Kin recognition is simply the ability of an individual to distinguish the relationship between genetically close related kin and non-kin. The kin recognition of plants has very important ecological and evolutionary significance. Increasing evidence shows that plants’ recognition of neighboring allogenous and heterogeneous plants is mostly mediated by chemicals [131,132]. When plants are attacked by herbivores, they will emit volatile signals to surrounding plants. Some plants, such as A. tidentata, suffered less damage than other plants that receive volatile signals from non-self-wounds [133,134]. This shows that VOCs play a role in plant self- and non-self-recognition. Because VOCs are the simplest and fastest chemical signal that can send to neighboring plants, plant recognition of volatiles helps plants to establish corresponding response strategies in the early stages of competition. This can avoid wasting resources in the competition between self and relatives as much as possible [130]. After a series of studies recently, although the kin recognition of plants is ubiquitous, most studies show that some plants do not have kin recognition behaviors in order to avoid meaningless competition [27,135,136,137]. Plants’ kin recognition has always been a hot topic in the study of behavioral ecology and evolution. From the perspective of genetic recognition, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to re-examine the ecological interaction of individual crops and groups and the environment.

3. Method of VOCs Collection and Identification

The allelopathy of VOCs has attracted widespread attention in recent years and a lot of research work has been done. With the advancement of organic separation and identification technology and the participation of more and more experts, the collection and identification technology of plants VOCs is no longer a difficult issue in research.

3.1. Collection of Plants VOCs

The volatiles mostly are organic compounds with a molecular weight between 100 and 200, such as hydrocarbons, alcohols, ketones, organic acids, nitrogen compounds, and organic sulfur [138]. Most of them have high chemical activity. Different collection methods may directly affect the type and proportion of VOCs, so it is particularly important to choose the appropriate method.
Traditional distillation collection techniques include steam distillation (SD), simultaneous distillation and solvent extraction (SDE), microwave-assisted hydrodistillation extraction (MWHD), ultrasound-assisted extraction (USE), and solid-phase trapping solvent extraction (SPTE). They have certain disadvantages in the isolation and purification of chemical constituents from plants tissues, such as long extraction time, high volumes solvent, and low efficiency [139]. In addition, many natural products are thermally unstable and may degrade during thermal extraction or distillation.
The most mainstream approach is headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME). It has some advantages over SD, SDE, and SPTE, such as rapid solvent-free extraction, no apparent thermal degradation, less laborious manipulation and sample requirement, and so on [140]. Moreover, due to the relatively low temperature and short headspace solid-phase extraction time, the risk of thermal artifacts is extremely low compared to other techniques [141]. Additionally, it is easy to standardize and fully integrate into the analysis system [142]. Thus, HS-SPME is an ideal technology of plants’ VOC collection.

3.2. Identification of Plants VOCs

Identification of allelochemicals involves both quantitative and qualitative measurement. Qualitative identification is the identification of the type and structure of the allelochemicals. Qualitative identification involves methods such as gas chromatography (GC), mass spectrometry (MS), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, and many other methods [143,144,145]. These are the analysis methods of VOCs, but the analytical difficulties and required instruments are completely different. Quantitative identification means the determination of the concentration of allelochemicals on the premise of clarifying the type of them. The method of chromatography is used to detect the concentration of known substances. Different methods should be selected for qualitative and quantitative identification, and the selection criteria are determined according to the characteristics of VOCs.
The existing identification techniques include gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS), and so on. PTR-MS has the potential to sample VOCs on-line and make quantitative analysis fast without any sample preparation [146,147]. The most widely used of these identification techniques is GC-MS [148]. Although PTR-MS can better achieve quantitative identification, most of the volatiles identified are preliminary [149]. GC-MS has a higher selectivity and sensitivity in the identification of VOCs and efficient separation and identification of the analytes.

4. Conclusions

This review summarizes the allelopathy of VOCs of plants including growth, competition, dormancy, resistance of pests and diseases, respiration, photosynthesis, ROS content, enzyme activity, and signaling. It also summarizes the main methods of collection and identification of VOCs. The study of allelopathy is quite a complicated work, because it involves a variety of disciplines such as chemistry, ecology, biology, microbiology, and so on. Scientists in these fields need to work together to conduct research. The study of allelopathy on plants VOCs is still a new field. Most of the researches still focus on the expression of the allelopathic phenomenon, but the depth and breadth of them are far from enough, such as the lack of research on allelopathy mechanisms of plants, the relationship between chemical recognition and communication mechanisms and allelopathy mechanisms, and so on. In recent years, we have seen more and more reports on VOCs. VOC transmission, emission, and accumulation are also hot topics in research, which deserve more research attention. There are still many issues that need to be further explored. Plant VOCs deserve more research attention.

5. Prospective

VOCs may have a wide range of potential allelopathic effects in agriculture. VOCs can not only manage weeds and pests as natural substance, but also regulate plant growth, competition, dormancy, respiration and photosynthesis, ROS content, enzyme activity, and diseases resistance. The most important thing is that they come from plants and meet our requirements for developing green agriculture. It has more economic value and is a more environmentally friendly and effective measure to use the allelopathic effects of plant natural products to develop agricultural industry. At the same time, there are some limitations in using allelopathy of VOCs of plants; for example, in field trials, VOCs are not easy to control. The volatilization of VOCs of plants is specific to species, cultivars, genotypes, and organs, as well as environments. In fact, the release of VOCs by plants are not single VOCs, but a complex mixture [150]. In agricultural production, the release of plant VOCs is affected by environmental and meteorological conditions, such as wind speed and direction, humidity and rain, and temperature, among others. These factors make the release of VOCs difficult to control. Moreover, the concentration of VOCs in open field experiments is often lower than in laboratory experiments. Therefore, the allelopathy of plant VOCs in agricultural production is more suitable for an easily controlled greenhouse.
With the development of allelochemicals identification technology and the participation of more and more chemists, the identification of allelochemicals is no longer a difficult problem in the study of allelopathy. However, the molecular mechanism of VOCs has not been studied, and it is not yet clear how VOCs are perceived by plants, and little is known about the dynamics of the active release pathway of VOCs of plants. Therefore, the focus of future research is to explore the nature and regularity of plant VOCs allelopathy and dynamic process of VOCs release, mainly to decipher the perception mechanism of VOCs within plant tissues. Over the past ten years, a large number of studies have proved that VOCs are involved in signal transduction among plants, and many allelochemicals involved in chemical communication have been identified. Now the problem we are facing is how the mechanism of chemical recognition and communication and the mechanism of allelopathy interacts. The general and specific chemical identification and the research on the identification and transfer mode of the communicating substance are urgent issues to be solved. Because the VOCs of plants are not easy to control, identifying the natural concentration of VOCs is also a major problem we face with.
At present, with increasing demands for environmental protection and sustainable development, VOCs have a dominant position in agricultural development and will become more competitive in the future, especially in the greenhouse. The theoretical research and practical application of allelopathy of plants VOCs have profound significance for sustainable development of agricultural production, for maintenance and improvement of natural resources, and for the rational arrangement of rotation and intercropping, the construction of efficient planting systems, and the improvement of natural resources’ utilization efficiency, for the construction of efficient planting systems and rational arrangement of rotation and intercropping or controlling pests and weeds. Not only that, the use of allelopathy of plant volatiles can also affect plant life activity by regulating plant growth, dormancy, respiration and photosynthesis, ROS content, and enzyme activity, or by the chemical communication between plants. In summary, the allelopathy of VOCs of plants has inestimable potential in agricultural development. Based on this, it is of great significance to develop and practice the application potential of allelopathy of plant VOCs.

Author Contributions

Writing—review and editing, Y.X., X.H. and L.T.; funding acquisition, X.H. and Y.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Youth Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31601747), High-Level Talents Project of Hainan Natural Science Foundation (No. 320RC723), Innovation Team Project of Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (No. 1630032017029), Departmental Budget Project of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, and Major Science and Technology Project in Hainan Province (No. ZDKJ2017001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Ziji Liu for comments on a previous version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Farooq, M.; Jabran, K.; Cheema, Z.A.; Wahid, A.; Siddique, K.H.M. The role of allelopathy in agricultural pest management. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 493–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pan, L.; Li, X.-Z.; Yan, Z.-Q.; Guo, H.-R.; Qin, B. Phytotoxicity of umbelliferone and its analogs: Structure-activity relationships and action mechanisms. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 97, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Boydston, R.A.; Morra, M.J.; Borek, V.; Clayton, L.; Vaughn, S.F. Onion and weed response to mustard (Sinapis alba) seed meal. Weed Sci. 2011, 59, 546–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Awan, F.K.; Rasheed, M.; Ashraf, M.; Khurshid, M.Y. Efficacy of brassica sorghum and sunflower aqueous extracts to control wheat weeds under rainfed conditions of pothwar. Pakistan J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2012, 22, 715–721. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bajwa, A.A.; Mahajan, G.; Chauhan, B.S. Nonconventional weed management strategies for modern agriculture. Weed Sci. 2015, 63, 723–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tavella, L.B.; Lima e Silva, P.S.; Monteiro, A.L.; de Oliveira, V.R.; de Oliveira Fernandes, P.L. Gliricidia sepium intercropping for weed management in immature corn ear production. Rev. Cienc. Agron. 2017, 48, 650–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Avato, P.; D’Addabbo, T.; Leonetti, P.; Argentieri, M.P. Nematicidal potential of brassicaceae. Phytochem. Rev. 2013, 12, 791–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, T.; Cheng, Z.; Meng, H.; Ahmad, I.; Zhao, H. Growth, yield and quality of spring tomato and physicochemical properties of medium in a tomato/garlic intercropping system under plastic tunnel organic medium cultivation. Sci. Hortic. 2014, 170, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Glinwood, R.; Ninkovic, V.; Pettersson, J. Chemical interaction between undamaged plants—Effects on herbivores and natural enemies. Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 1683–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Singh, A.; Weisser, W.W.; Hanna, R.; Houmgny, R.; Zytynska, S.E. Reduce pests, enhance production: Benefits of intercropping at high densities for okra farmers in Cameroon. Pest Manag. Sci. 2017, 73, 2017–2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bertin, C.; Yang, X.; Weston, L.A. The role of root exudates and allelochemicals in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 2003, 256, 67–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Abdel-Monaim, M.F.; Abo-Elyousr, K.A.M. Effect of preceding and intercropping crops on suppression of lentil damping-off and root rot disease in New Valley—Egypt. Crop Prot. 2012, 32, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ma, Y.-h.; Fu, S.-l.; Zhang, X.-p.; Zhao, K.; Chen, H.Y.H. Intercropping improves soil nutrient availability, soil enzyme activity and tea quantity and quality. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 119, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ndungu-Magiroi, K.W.; Wortmann, C.S.; Kibunja, C.; Senkoro, C.; Mwangi, T.J.K.; Wamae, D.; Kifuko-Koech, M.; Msakyi, J. Maize-bean intercrop response to nutrient application relative to maize sole crop response. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2017, 109, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bressan, M.; Roncato, M.-A.; Bellvert, F.; Comte, G.; Haichar, F.e.Z.; Achouak, W.; Berge, O. Exogenous glucosinolate produced by Arabidopsis thaliana has an impact on microbes in the rhizosphere and plant roots. Isme J. 2009, 3, 1243–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, M.; Jones, C.M.; Meijer, J.; Lundquist, P.-O.; Fransson, P.; Carlsson, G.; Hallin, S. Intercropping affects genetic potential for inorganic nitrogen cycling by root-associated microorganisms in Medicago sativa and Dactylis glomerata. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 119, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Farooq, M.; Bajwa, A.A.; Cheema, S.A.; Cheema, Z.A. Application of allelopathy in crop production. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2013, 15, 1367–1378. [Google Scholar]
  18. Alemayehu, A.; Tamado, T.; Nigussie, D.; Yigzaw, D.; Kinde, T.; Wortmann, C.S. Maize-common bean intercropping to optimize maize-based crop production. J. Agric. Sci. 2017, 155, 1124–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vivaldo, G.; Masi, E.; Taiti, C.; Caldarelli, G.; Mancuso, S. The network of plants volatile organic compounds. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Kigathi, R.N.; Weisser, W.W.; Reichelt, M.; Gershenzon, J.; Unsicker, S.B. Plant volatile emission depends on the species composition of the neighboring plant community. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kessler, A.; Baldwin, I.T. Defensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emissions in nature. Science 2001, 291, 2141–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bouwmeester, H.; Schuurink, R.C.; Bleeker, P.M.; Schiestl, F. The role of volatiles in plant communication. Plant J. 2019, 100, 892–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Rice, E.L. Allelopathy, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Orlando, FL, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  24. Adebesin, F.; Widhalm, J.R.; Boachon, B.; Lefevre, F.; Pierman, B.; Lynch, J.H.; Alam, I.; Junqueira, B.; Benke, R.; Ray, S.; et al. Emission of volatile organic compounds from petunia flowers is facilitated by an ABC transporter. Science 2017, 356, 1386–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Dudareva, N.; Klempien, A.; Muhlemann, J.K.; Kaplan, I. Biosynthesis, function and metabolic engineering of plant volatile organic compounds. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 16–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kong, C.; Hu, F.; Xu, X.; Zhang, M.; Liang, W. Volatile allelochemicals in the Ageratum conyzoides intercropped citrus orchard and their effects on mites Amblyseius newsami and Panonychus citri. J. Chem. Ecol. 2005, 31, 2193–2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. McNickle, G.G.; St Clair, C.C.; Cahill, J.F., Jr. Focusing the metaphor: Plant root foraging behaviour. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Dicke, M.; Baldwin, I.T. The evolutionary context for herbivore-induced plant volatiles: Beyond the “cry for help”. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Erb, M.; Veyrat, N.; Robert, C.A.M.; Xu, H.; Frey, M.; Ton, J.; Turlings, T.C.J. Indole is an essential herbivore-induced volatile priming signal in maize. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gfeller, V.; Huber, M.; Foerster, C.; Huang, W.; Koellner, T.G.; Erb, M. Root volatiles in plant-plant interactions I: High root sesquiterpene release is associated with increased germination and growth of plant neighbours. Plant Cell Environ. 2019, 42, 1950–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Molish, H. Der Einfluss Einer Pflanze auf die Andere-Allelopathie; Gustav Fischer Verlag: Jena, Germany, 1937. [Google Scholar]
  32. Simms, E.L.; Rausher, M.D. Costs and benefits of plant resistance to herbivory. Am. Nat. 1987, 130, 570–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kim, J.; Felton, G.W. Priming of antiherbivore defensive responses in plants. Insect Sci. 2013, 20, 273–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Langenheim, J.H. Higher plant terpenoids: A phytocentric overview of their ecological roles. J. Chem. Ecol. 1994, 20, 1223–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ameye, M.; Audenaert, K.; De Zutter, N.; Steppe, K.; Van Meulebroek, L.; Vanhaecke, L.; De Vleesschauwer, D.; Haesaert, G.; Smagghe, G. Priming of wheat with the green leaf volatile Z-3-hexenyl acetate enhances defense against fusarium graminearum but boosts deoxynivalenol production. Plant Physiol. 2015, 167, 1671–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Siri-Udom, S.; Suwannarach, N.; Lumyong, S. Applications of volatile compounds acquired from Muscodor heveae against white root rot disease in rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis Mull. Arg.) and relevant allelopathy effects. Fungal Biol. 2017, 121, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lerdau, M.; Gray, D. Ecology and evolution of light-dependent and light-independent phytogenic volatile organic carbon. New Phytol. 2003, 157, 199–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cofer, T.M.; Engelberth, M.; Engelberth, J. Green leaf volatiles protect maize (Zea mays) seedlings against damage from cold stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 1673–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Muller, C.H.; Muller, W.H.; Haines, B.L. Volatile growth Inhibitors produced by aromatic shrubs. Science 1964, 143, 471–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Muller, C.H. Inhibitory terpenes volatilized from salvia shrubs. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 1965, 92, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Abrahim, D.; Braguini, W.L.; Kelmer-Bracht, A.M.; Ishii-Iwamoto, E.L. Effects of four monoterpenes on germination, primary root growth, and mitochondrial respiration of maize. J. Chem. Ecol. 2000, 26, 611–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Norton, J.M.; Harman, G.E. Responses of soil microorganisms to volatile exudates from germinating pea seeds. Can. J. Bot. 1985, 63, 1040–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Won Yun, K.; Kil, B.S.; Han, D.M. Phytotoxic and antimicrobial activity of volatile constituents of Artemisia princeps var. orientalis. J. Chem. Ecol. 1993, 19, 2757–2766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jassbi, A.R.; Zamanizadehnajari, S.; Baldwin, I.T. Phytotoxic volatiles in the roots and shoots of Artemisia tridentata as detected by headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatographic-mass spectrometry analysis. J. Chem. Ecol. 2010, 36, 1398–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hütsch, B.W.; Augustin, J.; Merbach, W. Plant rhizodeposition—An important source for carbon turnover in soils. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2002, 165, 397–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lin, C.; Owen, S.M.; Peñuelas, J. Volatile organic compounds in the roots and rhizosphere of Pinus spp. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2007, 39, 951–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Delory, B.M.; Delaplace, P.; Fauconnier, M.-L.; du Jardin, P. Root-emitted volatile organic compounds: Can they mediate belowground plant-plant interactions? Plant Soil 2016, 402, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Fitter, A. Making allelopathy respectable. Science 2003, 301, 1337–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Brilli, F.; Loreto, F.; Baccelli, I. Exploiting plant volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in agriculture to Improve sustainable defense strategies and productivity of crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Oleszek, W. Allelopathic effects of volatiles from some Cruciferae species on lettuce, barnyard grass and wheat growth. Plant Soil 1987, 102, 271–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Romagni, J.G.; Allen, S.N.; Dayan, F.E. Allelopathic effects of volatile cineoles on two weedy plant species. J. Chem. Ecol. 2000, 26, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Schmidt-Silva, V.; Pawlowski, Â.; Kaltchuk-Santos, E.; Zini, C.; Soares, G. Cytotoxicity of essential oils from two species of Heterothalamus (Asteraceae). Aust. J. Bot. 2011, 59, 682–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cheng, F.; Cheng, Z.; Meng, H.; Tang, X. The garlic allelochemical diallyl disulfide affects tomato root growth by influencing cell division, phytohormone balance and expansin gene expression. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Cheng, F.; Cheng, Z.-H.; Meng, H.-W. Transcriptomic insights into the allelopathic effects of the garlic allelochemical diallyl disulfide on tomato roots. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kim, Y.S.; Kil, B.-S. Allelopathic effects of some volatile substances from the tomato plant. J. Crop Prod. 2001, 4, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Alves, M.d.C.S.; Medeiros Filho, S.; Innecco, R.; Torres, S.B. Alelopatia de extratos voláteis na germinação de sementes e no comprimento da raiz de alface. Pesqui. Agropecuária Bras. 2004, 39, 1083–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Norsworthy, J.K.; Meehan, J.T. Use of isothiocyanates for suppression of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri), pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa), and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Sci. 2017, 53, 884–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Horiuchi, J.-i.; Badri, D.V.; Kimball, B.A.; Negre, F.; Dudareva, N.; Paschke, M.W.; Vivanco, J.M. The floral volatile, methyl benzoate, from snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus) triggers phytotoxic effects in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 2007, 226, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Silva, E.R.; Overbeck, G.E.; Soares, G.L.G. Phytotoxicity of volatiles from fresh and dry leaves of two Asteraceae shrubs: Evaluation of seasonal effects. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2014, 93, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Souza-Alonso, P.; Novoa, A.; González, L. Soil biochemical alterations and microbial community responses under Acacia dealbata Link invasion. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 79, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Haramoto, E.R.; Gallandt, E.R. Brassica cover cropping for weed management: A review. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2007, 19, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Morra, M.J.; Kirkegaard, J.A. Isothiocyanate release from soil-incorporated Brassica tissues. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2002, 34, 1683–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Santonja, M.; Bousquet-Mélou, A.; Greff, S.; Ormeño, E.; Fernandez, C. Allelopathic effects of volatile organic compounds released from Pinus halepensis needles and roots. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 9, 8201–8213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Ren, K.; Hayat, S.; Qi, X.; Liu, T.; Cheng, Z. The garlic allelochemical DADS influences cucumber root growth involved in regulating hormone levels and modulating cell cycling. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 230, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wei, C.; Zhou, S.; Li, W.; Jiang, C.; Yang, W.; Han, C.; Zhang, C.; Shao, H. Chemical composition and allelopathic, phytotoxic and pesticidal activities of Atriplex cana Ledeb. (Amaranthaceae) essential oil. Chem. Biodivers. 2019, 16, e1800595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Effah, E.; Holopainen, J.K.; McCormick, A.C. Potential roles of volatile organic compounds in plant competition. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2019, 38, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Macias, F.A.; Molinillo, J.M.; Varela, R.M.; Galindo, J.C. Allelopathy—A natural alternative for weed control. Pest Manag Sci 2007, 63, 327–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Luiza Ishii-Iwamoto, E.; Marusa Pergo Coelho, E.; Reis, B.; Sebastiao Moscheta, I.; Moacir Bonato, C. Effects of monoterpenes on physiological processes during seed germination and seedling growth. Curr. Bioact. Compd. 2012, 8, 50–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Arroyo, A.I.; Pueyo, Y.; Pellissier, F.; Ramos, J.; Espinosa-Ruiz, A.; Millery, A.; Alados, C.L. Phytotoxic effects of volatile and water soluble chemicals of Artemisia herba-alba. J. Arid Environ. 2018, 151, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Runyon, J.B.; Mescher, M.C.; De Moraes, C.M. Volatile chemical cues guide host location and host selection by parasitic plants. Science 2006, 313, 1964–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Hunt, N.D.; Hill, J.D.; Liebman, M. Reducing freshwater toxicity while maintaining weed control, profits, and productivity: Effects of increased crop rotation diversity and reduced herbicide usage. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 1707–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Arimura, G.-i.; Shiojiri, K.; Karban, R. Acquired immunity to herbivory and allelopathy caused by airborne plant emissions. Phytochemistry 2010, 71, 1642–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Verdeguer, M.; Blázquez, M.; Boira, H. Phytotoxic effects of Lantana camara, Eucalyptus camaldulensis and Eriocephalus africanus essential oils in weeds of Mediterranean summer crops. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2009, 37, 362–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Benvenuti, S.; Cioni, P.L.; Flamini, G.; Pardossi, A. Weeds for weed control: Asteraceae essential oils as natural herbicides. Weed Res. 2017, 57, 342–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mushtaq, W.; Ain, Q.; Siddiqui, M.B.; Alharby, H.; Hakeem, K.R. Allelochemicals change macromolecular content of some selected weeds. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 130, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Fahey, J.W.; Zalcmann, A.T.; Talalay, P. The chemical diversity and distribution of glucosinolates and isothiocyanates among plants. Phytochemistry 2001, 56, 5–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Halkier, B.A.; Gershenzon, J. Biology and biochemistry of glucosinolates. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 303–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Petersen, J.; Belz, R.; Walker, F.; Hurle, K. Weed suppression by release of Isothiocyanates from turnip-rape mulch. Agron. J. 2001, 93, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Pardo-Muras, M.; Puig, C.G.; López-Nogueira, A.; Cavaleiro, C.; Pedrol, N. On the bioherbicide potential of Ulex europaeus and Cytisus scoparius: Profiles of volatile organic compounds and their phytotoxic effects. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0205997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Pardo-Muras, M.; Puig, C.G.; Pedrol, N. Cytisus scoparius and Ulex europaeus produce volatile organic compounds with powerful synergistic herbicidal effects. Molecules 2019, 24, 4539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Vokou, D.; Douvli, P.; Blionis, G.J.; Halley, J.M. Effects of monoterpenoids, acting alone or in pairs, on seed germination and subsequent seedling growth. J. Chem. Ecol. 2003, 29, 2281–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Barney, J.N.; Sparks, J.P.; Greenberg, J.; Whitlow, T.H.; Guenther, A. Biogenic volatile organic compounds from an invasive species: Impacts on plant–plant interactions. Plant Ecol. 2009, 203, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Campbell, M.; Segear, E.; Beers, L.; Knauber, D.; Suttle, J. Dormancy in potato tuber meristems: Chemically induced cessation in dormancy matches the natural process based on transcript profiles. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2008, 8, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Hosoki, T.; Hiura, H.; Hamada, M. Breaking bud dormancy in corms, tubers, and trees with sulfur-containing compounds. HortScience 1985, 20, 290–291. [Google Scholar]
  85. Hosoki, T. Breaking bud dormancy in corms and trees with sulfide compounds in garlic and horseradish. HortScience 1986, 21, 114–116. [Google Scholar]
  86. Kubota, N.; Yamane, Y.; Toriu, K.; Kawazu, K.; Higuchi, T.; Nishimura, S. Identification of active substances in garlic responsible for breaking bud dormancy in grapevines. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1999, 68(6), 1111–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Shukla, S.; Pandey, S.S.; Chandra, M.; Pandey, A.; Bharti, N.; Barnawal, D.; Chanotiya, C.S.; Tandon, S.; Darokar, M.P.; Kalra, A. Application of essential oils as a natural and alternate method for inhibiting and inducing the sprouting of potato tubers. Food Chem. 2019, 284, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Hartmans, K.J.; Diepenhorst, P.; Bakker, W.; Gorris, L.G.M. The use of carvone in agriculture: Sprout suppression of potatoes and antifungal activity against potato tuber and other plant diseases. Ind. Crop. Prod. 1995, 4, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Song, X.; Bandara, M.S.; Tanino, K.K. Potato dormancy regulation: Use of essential oils for sprout suppression in potato storage. Fruit Veg. Cereal Sci. Biotechnol 2009, 2, 110–117. [Google Scholar]
  90. Finger, F.L.; Santos, M.M.d.S.; Araujo, F.F.; Lima, P.C.C.; Costa, L.C.d.; França, C.d.F.M.; Queiroz, M.d.C. Action of essential oils on sprouting of non-dormant potato tubers. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2018, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Owolabi, M.S.; Olowu, R.A.; Lajide, L.; Oladimeji, M.O.; Padilla-Camberos, E.; Flores-Fernández, J.M. Inhibition of potato tuber sprouting during storage by the controlled release of essential oil using a wick application method. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 45, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Komai, K.; Tang, C.-S. A chemotype of Cyperus rotundus in Hawaii. Phytochemistry 1989, 28, 1883–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Neri, F.; Mari, M.; Brigati, S.; Bertolini, P. Fungicidal activity of plant volatile compounds for controlling Monilinia laxa in stone fruit. Plant Dis. 2007, 91, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Da Silva, A.C.; de Souza, P.E.; Amaral, D.C.; Zeviani, W.M.; Brasil Pereira Pinto, J.E. Essential oils from Hyptis marrubioides, Aloysia gratissima and Cordia verbenacea reduce the progress of Asian soybean rust. Acta Sci. Agron. 2014, 36, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Rienth, M.; Crovadore, J.; Ghaffari, S.; Lefort, F. Oregano essential oil vapour prevents Plasmopara viticola infection in grapevine (Vitis Vinifera) and primes plant immunity mechanisms. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0222854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Asthana, A.; Tripathi, N.N.; Dixit, S.N. Fungitoxic and phytotoxic studies with essential oil of Ocimum adscendens. J. Phytopathol. 1986, 117, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Chaturvedi, R.; Dikshit, A.; Dixit, S.N. Adenocalymma allicea, a new source of a natural fungitoxicant. Trop. Agric. 1987, 64, 318–322. [Google Scholar]
  98. Dube, S.; Upadhyay, P.D.; Tripathi, S.C. Antifungal, physicochemical, and insect-repelling activity of the essential oil of Ocimum basilicum. Can. J. Bot. 1989, 67, 2085–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wang, C.; Zhang, J.; Chen, H.; Fan, Y.; Shi, Z. Antifungal activity of eugenol against Botrytis cinerea. Trop. Plant Pathol. 2010, 35, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Rao, P.V.; Gan, S.H. Cinnamon: A multifaceted medicinal plant. Evid Based Complement Altern. Med. 2014, 2014, 642942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Quintana-Rodriguez, E.; Rivera-Macias, L.E.; Adame-Alvarez, R.M.; Torres, J.M.; Heil, M. Shared weapons in fungus-fungus and fungus-plant interactions? Volatile organic compounds of plant or fungal origin exert direct antifungal activity in vitro. Fungal Ecol. 2018, 33, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Mohammad, S.F.; Woodward, S.C. Characterization of a potent inhibitor of platelet aggregation and release reaction isolated from Allium sativum (Garlic). Thromb. Res. 1986, 44, 793–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Yang, F.; Liu, X.; Wang, H.; Deng, R.; Yu, H.; Cheng, Z. Identification and allelopathy of green garlic (Allium sativum L.) volatiles on scavenging of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) reactive oxygen species. Molecules 2019, 24, 3263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Sekine, T.; Sugano, M.; Majid, A.; Fujii, Y. Antifungal effects of volatile compounds from black zira (Bunium persicum) and other spices and herbs. J. Chem. Ecol. 2007, 33, 2123–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Mandal, S.; Mandal, M. Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) essential oil: Chemistry and biological activity. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2015, 5, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Friberg, M.; Schwind, C.; Roark, L.C.; Raguso, R.A.; Thompson, J.N. Floral scent contributes to interaction specificity in coevolving plants and their insect pollinators. J. Chem. Ecol. 2014, 40, 955–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Yazaki, K.; Arimura, G.-i.; Ohnishi, T. ‘Hidden’ terpenoids in plants: Their biosynthesis, localization and ecological roles. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017, 58, 1615–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Alborn, H.; Turlings, T.; Jones, T.H.; Stenhagen, G.; Loughrin, J.; Tumlinson, J. An elicitor of plant volatiles from beet armyworm oral secretion. Science 1997, 276, 945–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Degenhardt, J.; Hiltpold, I.; Köllner, T.G.; Frey, M.; Gierl, A.; Gershenzon, J.; Hibbard, B.E.; Ellersieck, M.R.; Turlings, T.C.J. Restoring a maize root signal that attracts insect-killing nematodes to control a major pest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 13213–13218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Li, H.-H.; Nishimura, H.; Hasegawa, K.; Mizutani, J. Allelopathy of Sasa cernua. J. Chem. Ecol. 1992, 18, 1785–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Cheng, F.; Cheng, Z. Research progress on the use of plant allelopathy in agriculture and the physiological and ecological mechanisms of allelopathy. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Weaver, T.; Klarich, D. Allelopathic effects of volatile substances from Artemisia tridentata Nutt. Am. Midl. Nat. 1977, 92, 508–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Einhellig, F.A. Mechanism of Action of Allelochemicals in Allelopathy; ACS Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  114. Kohli, R.K.; Batish, D.R.; Singh, H.P. Eucalypt oils for the control of Parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus L.). Crop Prot. 1998, 17, 119–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Einhellig, F.A.; Rasmussen, J.A. Effects of three phenolic acids on chlorophyll content and growth of soybean and grain sorghum seedlings. J. Chem. Ecol. 1979, 5, 815–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Sharkey, T.D.; Yeh, S. Isoprene emission from plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2001, 52, 407–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Kaur, S.; Singh, H.P.; Batish, D.R.; Kohli, R.K. Chemical characterization and allelopathic potential of volatile oil of Eucalyptus tereticornis against Amaranthus viridis. J. Plant Interact. 2011, 6, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Tsubo, M.; Nishihara, E.; Nakamatsu, K.; Cheng, Y.; Shinoda, M. Plant volatiles inhibit restoration of plant species communities in dry grassland. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2012, 13, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Yang, X.; Deng, S.; De Philippis, R.; Chen, L.; Hu, C.; Zhang, W. Chemical composition of volatile oil from Artemisia ordosica and its allelopathic effects on desert soil microalgae, Palmellococcus miniatus. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 51, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Zhao, J.; Yang, L.; Zhou, L.; Bai, Y.; Wang, B.; Hou, P.; Xu, Q.; Yang, W.; Zuo, Z. Inhibitory effects of eucalyptol and limonene on the photosynthetic abilities in Chlorella vulgaris (Chlorophyceae). Phycologia 2016, 55, 696–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Tsai, C.W.; Yang, J.J.; Chen, H.W.; Sheen, L.Y.; Lii, C.K. Garlic organosulfur compounds upregulate the expression of the pi class of glutathione S-transferase in rat primary hepatocytes. J. Nutr. 2005, 135, 2560–2565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Hsiung, Y.-C.; Chen, Y.-A.; Chen, S.-Y.; Chi, W.-C.; Lee, R.-H.; Chiang, T.-Y.; Huang, H.-J. Volatilized myrcene inhibits growth and activates defense responses in rice roots. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 2475–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Mutlu, S.; Atici, Ö.; Esim, N.; Mete, E. Essential oils of catmint (Nepeta meyeri Benth.) induce oxidative stress in early seedlings of various weed species. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2011, 33, 943–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Jin, P.; Wu, X.; Xu, F.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Zheng, Y. Enhancing antioxidant capacity and reducing decay of Chinese bayberries by essential oils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 3769–3775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Baldwin, I.T.; Halitschke, R.; Paschold, A.; von Dahl, C.C.; Preston, C.A. Volatile signaling in plant-plant interactions: “Talking trees” in the genomics era. Science 2006, 311, 812–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Heil, M.; Silva Bueno, J.C. Within-plant signaling by volatiles leads to induction and priming of an indirect plant defense in nature. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 5467–5472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Kessler, A.; Halitschke, R.; Diezel, C.; Baldwin, I.T. Priming of plant defense responses in nature by airborne signaling between Artemisia tridentata and Nicotiana attenuata. Oecologia 2006, 148, 280–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Ton, J.; D’Alessandro, M.; Jourdie, V.; Jakab, G.; Karlen, D.; Held, M.; Mauch-Mani, B.; Turlings, T.C.J. Priming by airborne signals boosts direct and indirect resistance in maize. Plant J. 2007, 49, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Heil, M.; Ton, J. Long-distance signalling in plant defence. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Biedrzycki, M.L.; Bais, H.P. Kin recognition in plants: A mysterious behaviour unsolved. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 4123–4128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Broz, A.K.; Broeckling, C.D.; De-la-Peña, C.; Lewis, M.R.; Greene, E.; Callaway, R.M.; Sumner, L.W.; Vivanco, J.M. Plant neighbor identity influences plant biochemistry and physiology related to defense. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Chen, B.J.; During, H.J.; Anten, N.P. Detect thy neighbor: Identity recognition at the root level in plants. Plant Sci. Int. J. Exp. Plant Biol. 2012, 195, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Karban, R.; Shiojiri, K. Self-recognition affects plant communication and defense. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12, 502–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Masclaux, F.; Hammond, R.L.; Meunier, J.; Gouhier-Darimont, C.; Keller, L.; Reymond, P. Competitive ability not kinship affects growth of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. New Phytol. 2010, 185, 322–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Milla, R.; Forero, D.M.; Escudero, A.; Iriondo, J.M. Growing with siblings: A common ground for cooperation or for fiercer competition among plants? Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 276, 2531–2540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Yang, X.-F.; Li, L.-L.; Xu, Y.; Kong, C.-H. Kin recognition in rice (Oryza sativa) lines. New Phytol. 2018, 220, 567–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Torices, R.; Gómez, J.M.; Pannell, J.R. Kin discrimination allows plants to modify investment towards pollinator attraction. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Brooks, G.T. Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology: Edited by G. A. Kerkut and L. I. Gilbert. Pergamon Press, Oxford. 1985. 13 Volumes. 8200 pp approx. £1700.00/$2750.00. ISBN 0 08 026850 1. Insect Biochem. 1985, 15, i–xiv. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Kimparis, A.; Siatis, N.; Daferera, D.; Tarantilis, P.; Pappas, C.; Polissiou, M. Comparison of distillation and ultrasound-assisted extraction methods for the isolation of sensitive aroma compounds from garlic (Allium sativum). Ultrason. Sonochem. 2006, 13, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Lee, S.N.; Kim, N.S.; Lee, D.S. Comparative study of extraction techniques for determination of garlic flavor components by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003, 377, 749–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Mutarutwa, D.; Navarini, L.; Lonzarich, V.; Compagnone, D.; Pittia, P. GC-MS aroma characterization of vegetable matrices: Focus on 3-alkyl-2-methoxypyrazines. J. Mass Spectrom. 2018, 53, 871–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Sgorbini, B.; Cagliero, C.; Liberto, E.; Rubiolo, P.; Bicchi, C.; Cordero, C. Strategies for accurate quantitation of volatiles from foods and plant-origin materials: A challenging task. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 1619–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Verpoorte, R.; Choi, Y.H.; Kim, H.K. NMR-based metabolomics at work in phytochemistry. Phytochem. Rev. 2007, 6, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Marshall, T.L.; Chaffin, C.T.; Makepeace, V.D.; Hoffman, R.M.; Hammaker, R.M.; Fateley, W.G.; Saarinen, P.; Kauppinen, J. Investigation of the effects of resolution on the performance of classical least-squares (CLS) spectral interpretation programs when applied to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of interest in remote sensing using open-air long-path Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometry. J. Mol. Struct. 1994, 324, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Stierlin, É.; Nicolè, F.; Fernandez, X.; Michel, T. Development of a headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method to study volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted by lavender roots. Chem. Biodivers. 2019, 16, e1900280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Danner, H.; Samudrala, D.; Cristescu, S.M.; Van Dam, N.M. Tracing hidden herbivores: Time-resolved non-invasive analysis of belowground volatiles by proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS). J. Chem. Ecol. 2012, 38, 785–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  147. Capozzi, V.; Lonzarich, V.; Khomenko, I.; Cappellin, L.; Navarini, L.; Biasioli, F. Unveiling the molecular basis of mascarpone cheese aroma: VOCs analysis by SPME-GC/MS and PTR-ToF-MS. Molecules 2020, 25, 1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Lebanov, L.; Ghiasvand, A.; Paull, B. Data handling and data analysis in metabolomic studies of essential oils using GC-MS. J. Chromatogr. A 2021, 1640, 461896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Majchrzak, T.; Wojnowski, W.; Lubinska-Szczygeł, M.; Różańska, A.; Namieśnik, J.; Dymerski, T. PTR-MS and GC-MS as complementary techniques for analysis of volatiles: A tutorial review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2018, 1035, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Hare, J.D. Ontogeny and season constrain the production of herbivore-inducible plant volatiles in the field. J. Chem. Ecol. 2010, 36, 1363–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The allelopathy pathways of plants.
Figure 1. The allelopathy pathways of plants.
Horticulturae 07 00278 g001
Figure 2. The main allelopathy of plants VOCs. (Note: This figure is widely inspired and adapted from Brilli et al. (2019) [49]).
Figure 2. The main allelopathy of plants VOCs. (Note: This figure is widely inspired and adapted from Brilli et al. (2019) [49]).
Horticulturae 07 00278 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xie, Y.; Tian, L.; Han, X.; Yang, Y. Research Advances in Allelopathy of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) of Plants. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7090278

AMA Style

Xie Y, Tian L, Han X, Yang Y. Research Advances in Allelopathy of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) of Plants. Horticulturae. 2021; 7(9):278. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7090278

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xie, Yiqi, Libo Tian, Xu Han, and Yan Yang. 2021. "Research Advances in Allelopathy of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) of Plants" Horticulturae 7, no. 9: 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7090278

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop