Next Article in Journal
First Report of Three Tylenchidae Taxa from Southern Alberta, Canada
Previous Article in Journal
Differential Triggering of the Phenylpropanoid Biosynthetic Pathway Key Genes Transcription upon Cold Stress and Viral Infection in Tomato Leaves
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Horticulturae
Volume 7
Issue 11
10.3390/horticulturae7110450
horticulturae-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Phytochemical Properties and Diverse Beneficial Roles of Eucalyptus globulus Labill.: A Review

by
Awad Y. Shala
1,* and
Mayank Anand Gururani
2,*
1
Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research Department, Horticulture Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza 12619, Egypt
2
Biology Department, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2021, 7(11), 450; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7110450
Submission received: 5 October 2021 / Revised: 24 October 2021 / Accepted: 25 October 2021 / Published: 2 November 2021
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Eucalyptus globulus Labill. is one of the most widely utilized medicinal plants throughout the world due to its wide spectrum of interesting biological activities that are mainly attributed to the diversity of phytochemical constituents in the plant parts. The emerging crisis of pathogen resistance for conventional antibiotics is considered a global concern for the diminishing effectiveness of antibiotics; hence, there is an urgent need to explore new antimicrobial ingredients from botanical sources, among which the most promising sources are medicinal plants. Moreover, the growing limitation toward synthetic antioxidants motivated the scientific community all over the world to identify plant-acquired antioxidants and antimicrobials. This is a huge global challenge, because of the increasing public health awareness and reliance on natural compounds, as these compounds are safer alternatives. Moreover, the undesirable impacts of synthetic pharmaceuticals can be avoided. Furthermore, plant extracts and their oil could be used as eco-friendly plant-based products for insects, weeds, and plant pathogen control, which will diminish the dependence on synthetic chemicals. Thus, this review is to highlight the richness of the E. globulus plant, with precious bioactive constituents, antioxidants, antimicrobials, and phytoremediation, and herbicidal activities, which will pave the way to the development of new pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals, as well as food preservatives. They may also provide potential commercial applications to counteract the limitations of synthetic antioxidants.

1. Introduction

E. globulus belongs to the family of Myrtaceae; an evergreen broadleaf tree, with a straight trunk, indigenous to Australia, the genus Eucalyptus comprises of more than 700 species [1]. It is known as “the blue gum” or Tasmanian blue gum. Nowadays, E. globulus is extensively cultivated worldwide [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16] because of its easy adaptability to environmental conditions, ease of cultivation, fast growth rate, and increase in the woody biomass. Furthermore, it can be planted in contaminated areas [17]. Obviously, Eucalyptus can adapt to biotic and abiotic stresses by selectively releasing defense compounds mainly of mono- and sesquiterpenes, as well as some hydrocarbons and quinones [18]. E. globulus has attracted the attention of researchers as well as environmentalists worldwide, due to it commonly being used in the pulp industry as a fast-growing source, and for the essential oil extracted from its leaves. Commercially, it is widely used for different purposes.
The essential oil of Eucalyptus spp. is among the 18 most frequently traded essential oils throughout the world. On account of this, there is an increasing amount of attention paid to their advantages as raw materials, which can be used in food, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics, both in scientific and industrial research [1,19]. Among them E. globulus Labill. is the main source of the Eucalyptus leaf oil used globally [3]. Its leaves are alternate, with yellowish petioles, precisely lanceolate, 10–30 cm long, 2.5–5 cm wide, shiny dark green on both surfaces, and are a rich source of essential oil [7,10,20,21,22]. The oil is typically extracted by hydrodistillation, as the greatest amount of extracted chemical compounds can be obtained by utilizing this method [4,15,21]. The essential oil yield ranges from 1–3% [1,3,9,19,20,23]. The chemical composition of the Eucalyptus leaf essential oil is a complex mixture of substances, commonly containing 20 to 54 components with varying concentrations [4,8,13,15,24]. The oil comprised particularly of oxygenated monoterpenes (80.65–87.32%) as well as monoterpene hydrocarbons (18.33–12.45%) [9,25].
The extracted leaf essential oil is more or less pale yellow and has a pleasant odor, having a camphor-like smell [5,20,26]. The physical properties of this oil include a refractive index from 1.4657 ± 0.0070 to 1.4693 ± 0.00057, a specific gravity from 0.913 to 0.919 g/cm3 [5,20], an optical rotation of +1.5956, and a pH (22 °C) of 4.9 [5]. The chemical properties of the extracted leaf essential oil, which include acid value, saponification value, hydroxyl value, and iodine value, are 0.5945, 19.576, 31.61, and 41.52, respectively [5]. All of the previous physicochemical properties are considered significant for oil quality determination, especially for marketing strategies.
The major component of the essential oil of Eucalyptus leaves is monoterpene oxide 1,8-cineole (Figure 1), also known as Eucalyptol [3,9,13,20,21]. Eucalyptol is commonly utilized in flavoring, fragrance, and cosmetics. This is attributable to its pleasant spicy aroma and taste. It is also used in mouthwash applications and cough suppressants [22]. The commercial value of the essential oil depends chiefly on the existence of 1,8-cineole [9,26]. Consequently, the absence of 1,8-cineole and existence of α-phellandrene in the Nigerian-grown E. globulus, which has a high cytotoxic effect, make the oil suitable for insecticidal formulations and inappropriate for medicinal purposes [27].
Eucalyptus leaf essential oil has drawn the attention of numerous researchers, as it represents a wide range of biological potentials, such as antibacterial efficacy toward both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [28,29] and considerable antibacterial potency against periodontal diseases [20,30]. Therefore, it can be incorporated into dental care products, as it is an anti-inflammatory agent [10,31]; has antifungal [16,28,32,33] and antidiabetic potential [34,35]; insecticidal [36,37,38,39], acaricidal, and repellent activities; is a biodegradable pesticide [40]; has bio-nematicide efficacy [7], phytopathogen control [8,23], and anthelmintic activity [41]; and it is a natural agent for food preservation [25]. Furthermore, this leaf essential oil has been previously applied in “folk medicine, in the treatment of respiratory problems, including, cold, cough, runny nose, sore throat, asthma, nasal congestion, bronchitis, and sinusitis” [42].
In a study conducted in Germany, the authors identified the main compound in the essential oil of hydro-distilled fruits to be; aromadendrene (Figure 1), which exerted antibacterial activity [3,43]. Nevertheless, Bey-Ould Si Said et al. [44], revealed the predominance of globulol (23.6%), which is the major component in the fruit oils extracted from plants growing in the north-east of Algeria (Figure 1). The essential oil of fruits possesses antibacterial activity [43,44]; hence, fruit oil is a potential candidate for application in the pharmaceutical and food industries.
Leaves and root extracts possess antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antitumor activities [35,45,46,47], which correlate with the elevated amount of plant phytoconstituents. Additionally, leaf extracts possess fungicidal potency [48], allelopathic potential [49,50,51], anti-hyperglycemic potential [52], a potential anticancer activity [53], antibacterial activity [30,54,55], and neuroprotective activity [56]. In addition, leaf extracts are presently utilized in cosmetic formulations and food additives [35]. The E. globulus stump that is defined as “the basal part of the tree”, including the near-the-ground stem portion, and the woody roots that remain after “stem felling”, possesses antioxidant and antimicrobial activities [57].
The aim of the current review is to present recent information on the phytochemical, antioxidant, and antimicrobial aspects of the E. globulus plant parts, besides the factors influencing the essential oil composition of the plants, and also its eco-friendly applications. This may help gather fruitful information for the potential use of the plant, as a precious source of diverse ingredients, in multiple applications.

2. Bioactive Components

Miscellaneous investigations revealed the occurrence of considerable amounts of versatile bioactive components in the different plant parts, which are presented in Table 1. These phytochemicals are responsible for the therapeutic impacts of the plant [2,9,43,44,47]. In most of the studies, 1,8-cineole is the dominant component in the essential oils of leaves, with various percentages (Table 1), except for a few findings [26,27,58,59]. Furthermore, phytochemical analysis of the leaf extracts proved the presence of tannins, saponins, terpenoids, glycosides, alkaloids, phenolic compounds, steroids, cardiac glycosides, terpenes, reducing sugars, carbohydrates, resins, acidic compounds, and flavonoids [19,30,52,60]. In addition, the high phenolic content in the Eucalyptus plant parts (Table 1) that correlated with positive health influences against oxidative stress has also been formerly documented [2,46,56,57,61]. Additionally, triterpene compounds that possess significant pharmaceutical applications have been previously identified in Eucalyptus leaves, bark, and fruits [62,63,64].
The anthelmintic activity of the essential oil from extracted leaves has been previously reported by Taur et al. [41]. This has been ascribed to the occurrence of valuable phytoconstituents in the oil, such as borneol, linalool, cineol, geranyl acetate, anethol, and saffrol. Additionally, phytochemical and fingerprint analyses of the essential oil from leaves displayed a higher content of flavonoids, as compared to phenols, whereas the Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrophotometer proved the existence of polyphenolic compounds, such as rutin, tannic acid, vanillic acid, and ascorbic acid, which is vastly utilized in the food industry. Furthermore, the gas chromatography analysis characterized the major constituents of the essential oil as 1,8 cineole (29%), α-pinene (16.9%), and β-pinene (16%) [31].
Pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of the Eucalyptus leaves’ aqueous ethanol extract identified the presence of 21 compounds and the key characterized compounds were β-eudesmol (12.84%), γ-eudesmol (3.36%), globulol (2.87%), and alloaromadendrene (3.80%); in contrast, the presence of α-selinene and α-gurgujene was observed in low concentrations [54]. Furthermore, the detection of guaiacol, syringol, o-cymene, catechol, and phenol could be associated with the presence of small fragments of lignin and lignin-derived monomeric products in the leaf extracts [54]. The major triterpenic acids identified in the E. globulus leaf extracts were betulinic, betulonic, oleanolic, ursolic, 3-acetyloleanolic, and 3-acetylursolic acids, which were considered to be valuable pharmaceutical compounds [62]. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis (GC-MS) of the methanolic extract identified the existence of nine compounds, 9,10-secocholesta-5,7,10(19)-triene 1, 3-diol,25 [(trimethylsily) oxy] (,3β, 5Z,7E)-, 1-Heptatriacotanol, Morphinan-4,5 epoxy3,6diol, 6 [7nitrobenzofurazan-4-yl] amino, 10-Heptadecen-8-ynoic acid, methyl ester, [E]-, Ethyl Iso-allocholate, 2-Myristynoyl pantetheine, Cholesta-8,24-dien-3-ol,4-methyl-, [3β, 4α]-, Cyclopropanedodecanoic acid, 2-octyl-, methyl ester, 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, and 2-phenyl-1,3-dioxan-5-yl ester [52]. Interestingly, hydrosol, obtained as a by-product of leaf hydrodistillation, exhibited an effective insecticidal activity toward the mealybug, which nominated it as a potential biodegradable insecticidal compound, instead of a synthetic pesticide [68].
Regarding the chemical composition of the bark, Domingues et al. [64] reported the exploitation practicality of using the large quantities of bark generated by pulp industries as a by-product, instead of burning it for energy production, as it was rich in valuable triterpenoid compounds (betulonic, betulinic, 3-acetylbetulinic, ursolic, 3-acetylursolic, oleanolic, and 3-acetyloleanolic acids) in addition to β-amirine, β-sitosterol, palmitic acid, and aliphatic alcohols. Additionally, triterpenoid acids were chiefly concentrated in the surface layers of the trunk and the bark branches. The triterpenoid content was 1.2 g/kg in fruits and 121.1 g/kg in the surface layers of the bark branch residues.
Although the bark is an industrial waste product, its aqueous extract contains a natural source of antioxidant that is attributed to an abundant amount of gallotannins and some other phenolic components [67]. Similarly, the E. globulus bark has a plethora of polyphenolic compounds that exhibit anti-proliferative activity against carcinoma cells [69]. Moreover, De Melo et al. [63] stated that the deciduous bark of E. globulus contains ursolic and 3-acetylursolic acids, as the most abundant components, representing 52% of triterpenic acids, while hexacosan-1-ol and octacosan-1-ol from aliphatic alcohols represent approximately 7% of the total extract, even as the sterols fraction represents 4.24% of the total extract and β-sitosterol represents the most of this group (Sterols) (4.05% vs. 4.24%).
In recent times, Lourenço et al. [70], for the first time, identified using GC-MS, eight polyhydroxy triterpenoid acids from the milled wood of mature E. globulus mature trees (40 years), the dichloromethane extract, which included “hederagenin, (4α)-23-hydroxybetulinic acid, maslinic acid, corosolic acid, arjunolic acid, asiatic acid, caulophyllogenin, and madecassic acid, with 2,3, and 4 hydroxyl substituents”, which represented 10.4% of the wood extract. These characterized compounds are known to have interesting pharmaceutical and medical applications.

3. Factors Influencing the Essential Oil Composition of Plants

Several studies concentrated basically on the diversity of the essential oil composition extracted from the plant leaves, which is considered the main commercial source of 1,8-cineole, as depicted in Table 1. The fluctuation in essential oil components linked the phenological stage, environmental conditions, seasonal variations, occurrence of chemotypes, and extraction methods to geographical locations.
One of the major ingredients of the Eucalyptus leaf oil is 1,8-cineole (Eucalyptol). It is a cyclic ether with an empirical formula C10 H18O. Eucalyptol determines the commercial value of Eucalyptus essential oil for various industries [71]. Recent studies have demonstrated the tremendous potential of Eucalyptol and its antimicrobial properties (reviewed in [71]). It’s percent and antibacterial activity depends on the specific species [1,19]. The predominance of Eucalyptol is overwhelming, as seen in the previous studies (Table 1). It has been formerly mentioned that oil from cultivated plants, from diverse regions of the world, denote the following various percentages: 86.51% in Germany [3], 85.8% in Montenegro [9], 80.2% in Turkey [10], 76.65% in Iran [11], 75.8% in Brazil [12], 71.05% in Brazil [1], 69.32% in Brazil [23], 63.81% in Spain [13], 63.00% in Ethiopia [14], 62.38% in Ethiopia [15], 59.63% in Serbia [16], 56.83% in Algeria [33], 55.43% in Ethiopia [24], 55.29% in Algeria [20], 54.79% in India [4], 51.62% in Tanzania [22], 51.08% in Algeria [5], 48.2% in Tunisia [35], 46.76% in Egypt [37], 36.68% in Portugal [6], 23.3% in Nigeria [7], and 22.35% in Morocco [8]. It is observed from the above cited studies that the patterns of leaf essential oil compositions differ notably in the plants cultivated in different locations, which consequently reflect on their biological activities.
On the other hand, some previous findings also characterize the various main components from plants growing in other regions, where the major component of leaf essential oil from plants grown in Algeria is identified by GC as γ-terpinene (94.48%) and 1,8-cineole (3.20%) [58]. Additionally, Benabdesslem et al. [26], reported that p-cymene (20.24%) is the major constituent in the Algerian-grown E. globulus plants (southwest Algeria) and the authors concluded that Eucalyptus leaves originating from the same region, as well as their essential oils, can be utilized for the influenza virus, as inhalants and as a substitute for imported materials. Both the aforementioned studies were in contrast with the results obtained by Harkat-Madouri et al. [20], for the plants grown in north east Algeria, where the authors identified 1,8-cineole (55.29%), spathulenol (7.44%), and α-terpineol (5.46%) as the predominant components. The oil from the plants grown in Nigeria had terpinen-4-ol (23.46%) as the most abundant component, but 1,8-cineole was not detected in the leaf essential oil [27]. Additionally, p-cymene was a predominant component in Tunisian-grown Eucalyptus and accounted for 18.18%, while 1,8-cineole represented 3.16% [59]. In contrast, Pino et al. [21] found that the chemical composition of the leaf essential oil was not significantly influenced by the growth region in Ecuador.
The phenological stage led to marked influences on the essential oil yield and composition. Salem et al. [72] found, on Tunisian-grown Eucalyptus, that the plants harvested at the late fructification stage produced the highest oil yield (0.32% w/w) as compared to the essential oil yield of plants harvested at the vegetative and full flowering stages (0.11 and 0.14% w/w, respectively), which was ascribed to the development of secretory structures of essential oil, that are often associated with plant ontogeny. Furthermore, plant growth development and essential oil accumulation were greatly influenced by environmental conditions. Additionally, the essential oil ingredients were also altered by the growth stage; thus, at the vegetative and full flowering stages, the major components were 1,8-cineole and p-cymene (13.23 and 32.19%, respectively); although, in the fructification stage, the main compound was 1,8-cineole (37.82%).
Abdossi et al. [11] stated that the E. globulus essential oil composition was greatly influenced by environmental circumstances. According to Luís et al. [13], the variation in the main components of essential oil could be ascribed to the “genetic variation, plant organ, and different environmental factors”.
With regard to seasonal variations, Usman et al. [34], found that the essential oil of E. globulus grown in north-central Nigeria had D-limonene and m-cymene chemotypes as the predominant compounds (23.5 and 24.8%, respectively) detected in the leaf oil procured in the dry and rainy seasons, respectively. For efficient oil extraction from E. globulus leaves, hydrodistillation was used to produce a higher amount of oil yield, such as 1.1 and 1.21% of essential oil (w/w, based on the fresh weight of the mature leaves) [4,15] rather than the oil obtained (0.2% w/w) from steam distillation [5]. Although steam distillation was more favorable than traditional hydrodistillation, the aromatic oil obtained from steam distillation was appropriate for food processing as a plant-derived flavoring agent.

4. Antioxidant Activity of E. globulus Labill.

The increasing awareness of synthetic antioxidants motivated a number of scholars, on a global scale, to identify alternative antioxidants of plant origin, to avoid the unfavorable effects of synthetic antioxidants [13,34,45]. In this regard, the antioxidant potential of different Eucalyptus plant parts (leaves, fruits, roots, and stump wood) as well as their essential oils were formerly reported as being able to be utilized to diminish oxidative stress-associated diseases, and also as food preservatives [13,31,47,57]
The leaf essential oil of Nigerian-grown E. globulus exhibited a low antioxidant capacity via its potential to scavenge DPPH radicals, with elevated IC50 values (136.87 µL/mL) as compared to the standard antioxidant ascorbic acid. This may be attributed to the absence of some components such as 1,8-cineole in the leaf oil as well as the potential antagonistic impact between other components in Eucalyptus oil [27]. Conversely, Luis et al. [13] reported that the essential oil of E. globulus exerted a remarkable antioxidant efficacy through its ability to scavenge DPPH radicals with an IC50 value (2.90 ± 0.35 v/v), with respect to the IC50 value (4.56 ± 0.70 v/v) for Eucalyptus radiata. This may be related to the existence of 1,8-cineole as the main constituent only in E. globulus essential oil, as well as the synergistic effect between other oil components. Moreover, the essential oil of E. globulus showed great activity to inhibit the lipid peroxidation with an IC50 value (2.72 ± 0.01 v/v) inferior to the activity of the synthetic antioxidant BHT, with an IC50 value of 3.58 ± 0.02 w/v, in the β-carotene bleaching test. This was considered a promising result that supported the E. globulus essential oil as a potential natural substitute, to overcome the adverse side effects of synthetic antioxidants, especially for food preservation.
Salem et al. [72] stated that the elevated antioxidant activity was detected at the full flowering and fructification stage; thus, a positive relationship existed between the essential oil content and its antioxidant potential. Furthermore, the essential oil of the aerial parts showed a potent DPPH scavenging capacity as well as moderate reducing power efficacy as compared with butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) and ascorbic acid, respectively [11,34]. Additionally, the chelating ability of the ferrous ions of the essential oil extracted at the vegetative and full flowering stages was more prominent than that of the oil extracted at the fructification stage, which was attributed to the metal chelating impacts of 1,8-cineole, α-terpineol, and methyleugenol. Interestingly, Usman et al. [34] studied the effect of the seasonal variation on the antioxidant activity of Eucalyptus essential oil and demonstrated the richness of the leaf essential oil harvested in the rainy season with oxygenated mono- and sesquiterpenoids, which was reflected in its higher scavenging activity for the DPPH radical as well as significant ferric-reducing power, as compared to the leaf essential oil gathered in the dry season. Of late, Sharma et al. [68] stated that Eucalyptus essential oil evidenced a powerful antioxidant potential that was clearly observed via IC50 values of 70.12, 48.26, 17.94, and 15.45, for DPPH, Nitric oxide, Hydroxyl radical, and ABTS radical scavenging activities, respectively, as compared to 9.62, 57.19, 119.38, and 127.16, being the IC50 values for ascorbic acid, while the IC50 value of 18.37 was for the iron-reducing power, with respect to the IC50 value of ascorbic acid (59.33). The marked reducing power was an important factor for pharmacological drugs that were responsible for the alleviation of free radicals and oxidative stress-associated diseases. The authors attributed the elevated antioxidant activity of essential oil to its richness with flavonoids and phenolic compounds.
The highest phenolic content was provided by methanol and methanol:water extracts of dried Eucalyptus leaves, as compared to other utilized solvents. Additionally, the greatest antioxidant activity was achieved from the dry leaf methanol:water extract and its antioxidant efficacy strongly correlated with the phenolic content [45]. The greatest DPPH radical scavenging potential was achieved from the leaf methanol extract, with an IC50 value of 23 μg/mL, followed by the leaf ethyl acetate extract and hexane extract, with IC50 values of 29 and 65 μg/mL, respectively. With respect to BHT (IC50 = 17 μg/mL) and vitamin E (IC50 = 26 μg/mL), the authors correlated the strongest activity of the methanol extract to its high content of phenolic compounds [35]. Similar findings were also achieved by Nile and Keum [46], wherein the leaves of the methanol extract displayed considerable antioxidant potency through the scavenging capacity and ferric reducing power of the DPPH radicals, as well as the OH radical scavenging potential, which was linked to the raised total phenolic and total flavonoid content, as compared to the chloroform and hexane extracts. Contrary to this, Bencheikh et al. (2021), revealed that the aqueous extract of the E. globulus leaves exerted the DPPH radical scavenging activity with an IC50 value of 18.9 ± 1.5 (µg/mL) lower than BHT (5.7 ± 1.2 µg/mL).
The fruit extract displayed a high reducing power capacity with an IC50 value of 39.52 µg/mL, as compared to α-tocopherol (117.76 µg/mL). Moreover, the extract represented a moderate lipid peroxidation inhibition activity. Furthermore, the authors depicted the antioxidant activity due to the abundance of phenolic compounds, especially hydrolyzable tannins, in the fruit extract [73]. The results obtained by Bey-Ould Si Said et al. [44] suggested that the essential oil extracted from the fruits of Nigerian-grown E. globulus showed lower antioxidant activities, through the higher IC50 values of the DPPH radical, reducing the power and lipid peroxidation activities (27.0 ± 0.2, 32.8 ± 1.8, and 4.9 ± 0.2 mg mL−1, respectively) with respect to the IC50 values of the tested BHA standard (0.05 ± 0.0, 0.03 ± 0.0, and 0.5 ± 0.2 mg mL−1, respectively). However, the three antioxidant activities were more effective when compared with the results of the antioxidant activities of the essential oil from the leaves, observed by Harkat-Madouri et al. [20], in the same growth region where the essential oil of the hydro-distilled leaves showed a DPPH radical scavenging capacity ranging from 11.72 to 60.63% inhibition percentage, with an IC50 = 33.33 ± 0.55 mg/mL, with respect to the standard BHA (IC50 = 0.033 ± 0.002 mg/mL), while the reducing power efficacy, with an IC50 value of 115.39 ± 1.45 mg/mL, was lower than the activity of the standard BHA (IC50 = 0.048 ± 0.015 mg/mL). Additionally, the oil exerted a high lipid peroxidation inhibition activity that had an IC50 value of 6.75 ± 0.39 mg/mL, as compared to an IC50 value of 0.455 ± 0.19 mg/mL of the standard BHA. The abundance of ineffective compounds in the tested oil may be responsible for its low efficacy.
By using the DPPH and β-carotene bleaching test methods, the polar extracts (ethanol, methanol, and 75% aqueous ethanol) of the E. globulus stumps showed a significant antioxidant capacity, with a lower IC50 value than the non-polar extract (n-hexane). This was because the phenolic structures were easily extracted by the polar extracts, which explained the economic importance of the stumps as the oldest part of the tree. Furthermore, the ability of stump extracts to inhibit lipid peroxidation indicated the possibility of using these extracts as food preservatives, particularly with a high fat content [57]. Moreover, Ita (2020) found that the ethanol root extract of E. globulus, which considered limited outcomes, showed a potent antioxidant activity through the DPPH radical scavenging potential, promising a reducing power that correlated with the relationship between the antioxidant activity and root content of phenolics and flavonoids, which suggested that the roots were a promising source of natural antioxidants for diminishing the reactive oxygen species in biological systems. Additionally, the crude bark extracts as well as fruit extracts had an antioxidant activity that could be used as an alternative for pure compounds, such as plant-derived antioxidants [61,73], to overcome the deleterious effects of synthetic antioxidants.

5. Antimicrobial Activity

5.1. Antibacterial Activity

The emerging concern of the ineffectiveness of conventional antimicrobial agents, as well as the growing multidrug resistant strains, as a global threat, generated a true need for the exploration of natural alternatives, with a potent antibacterial potential to cure infectious diseases that were an increasing threat to human health [21,55]. Thus, the antibacterial impact of different parts of the plant, as well as their essential oils, have been greatly investigated for tremendous Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains, as summarized in Table 2, demonstrating that E. globulus is a promising antibacterial agent with enormous therapeutic applications. The efficiency of Eucalyptus essential oil, as well as plant part extracts, against bacterial species are attributed to the following:
The extracted essential oil from fruits exerted pronounced antibacterial potency against tested multidrug-resistant bacteria. Furthermore, the combination of 1,8-cineole and aromadendrene from fruit oils produced a higher inhibition through an additive and synergistic effect against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Bacillus subtilis, as compared to using a single compound [43]. The antibacterial efficacy was ascribed to the highest percentage of oxygenated monoterpenes (87.32%) in Eucalyptus leaf oil, and the synergism also resulted from other minor components [9]. The antimicrobial effects of the methanolic extract from leaves, against S. aureus and B. subtilis, could be attributed to the existence of tannins and saponins [60]. Similarly, leaf extracts proved the anticariogenic activity, due to the existence of sesquiterpene alpha-farnesene that would lead to an advancement of effective drugs for the treatment of dental caries [19].
The greatest antibacterial activity was obtained from the synergism between E. globulus essential oil or leaf extracts and antibiotics toward P. aeruginosa [2]. Additionally, Goldbeck et al. [1] observed a synergism effect as a result of the combination between E. globulus and E. urograndis essential oils against Streptococcus mutans. Furthermore, the highest antibacterial activity was correlated with the elevated concentration of 1,8-cineole (71%) in E. globulus, as compared to E. urograndis (36%), which supported the potential usage of E. globulus essential oil, through its incorporation into biodegradable films, as an environmentally benign strategy to control S. mutans, as an important oral pathogen.
As outlined by Luís et al. [13], the synergistic action of essential oil with the presence of chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, and tetracycline toward Acinetobacter baumannii strains was observed. On the other hand, there was no synergistic activity between the combination of essential oil with cefoperazone and piperacillin against the aforementioned strains. The powerful antibacterial efficacy was correlated with the high content of α-pinene and 1,8-cineole in the essential oil extracted from the leaves [14]. Notwithstanding, Quatrin et al. [12] reported that nano-emulsions contained a low amount of Eucalyptus essential oil (5%) and were ineffective against the Gram-negative bacterium, which was generally found in immunocompromised patients. Interestingly, synergism was detected in the combination of ampicillin and Eucalyptus essential oil against Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, which accordingly brought down the MIC value of the antibiotic by 32-fold and the MIC of the essential oil to half against S. aureus. This combination also reduced the essential oil toxicity of the healthy cells [72].
The methanol extract of leaves displayed a promising antibacterial activity against S. mutans, S. aureus, and E. coli, as compared to the aqueous and ethanol leaf extracts, which was attributable to the extraction of highly diverse components by methanol, with respect to other extracts [30]. The Eucalyptus aqueous ethanol leaf extract showed a similar trend and exhibited antibacterial activity against the tested species. The authors attributed the additive or synergistic effect as being related to the existence of various bioactive molecules [54]. The aqueous extract of E. globulus leaves showed the same mode of action as Ampicillin against S. aureurs. Furthermore, the extract showed a significant inhibitory action against S. aureus and B. subtilis as compared to Gentamicin, which could explain the profound amount of polyphenols and flavonoids in the extract [55].
Eucalyptus essential oil and its main component (1,8-cineole) exerted a potent antibacterial activity against the development of the biofilm produced by methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains [78]. Interestingly, Obeizi et al. [33] proved that the ZnO nanoparticles biosynthesized from the leaf essential oil displayed effective anti-biofilm activity against S. aureus ATCC 25923 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, which are known for their elevated biofilm formation potential that will help to overcome antibiotic resistance resulting from a bacterial biofilm, which is considered the major reason for nosocomial infection transition. The antimicrobial potential of the Eucalyptus leaf essential oil may be due to the synergistic effects of the polyphenolics [31].
Generally, Gram-negative bacterial cells were more resistant to the presence of Eucalyptus extracts as well as its essential oil than the Gram-positive ones [20,25,58,72]. In addition, the fruit extract showed antibacterial activity only against the Gram-positive bacteria, which was due to its richness in phenolic compounds, even as no activity was detected against the Gram-negative bacteria, which could be ascribed to their outer lipopolysaccharide membrane [73].

5.2. Antifungal Activity

Few studies have been conducted on the impact of E. globulus leaves and stumps as antifungal agents (Table 3) to eradicate fungal infections that are antibiotic-resistant, as a major challenge worldwide, for example, in the case of Candida spp. and other fungal species. Furthermore, due to the growing number of cases infected by the Candida spp. and the increased risk of drug resistance, finding a new therapeutic strategy is considered to be of fundamental importance. The induced antifungal efficacy has been attributed to the richness of the plant parts with diverse phytochemical constituents (Table 1) that represent a cost-effective approach to combat fungal infections.
E. globulus essential oil showed a potent anti-candidal efficacy, indicating that the oil is a potential candidate for mouth wash applications [32]. Similarly, Eucalyptus essential oil surpassed the antifungal nystatin (a drug utilized to control fungal infections on the skin, mouth, vagina, and intestinal tract) twice over, in the antifungal efficacy against C. albicans, which could likely be ascribed to the high content of 1,8-cineole (85.8%) in the leaf essential oil [9]. Nanoemulsions containing E. globulus essential oil that was commercially acquired possessed antifungal and antibiofilm activities against C. albicans, which were the main microorganisms responsible for initiating fungal infections globally [12]. These findings were due to the nanoencapsulation-enhanced functionality of the essential oil via the protection of essential oil components, as well as the reduced size of the nanoemulsions that resulted in rapid penetration.
The essential oil from the Tunisian Eucalyptus aerial parts proved to have a potent antifungal efficacy against C. albicans that was greater than the antifungal (Amphotericin B), especially the essential oil obtained in the fruiting stage, rather than the essential oil obtained in the vegetative and full flowering stages. This was probably because of the defense mechanisms of the plant during fruit formation or the variation in oil components during the different growth stages, as the oil contains considerable amounts of α-pinene and p-cymene with a high essential oil yield during the final developmental stage. Furthermore, the combined application of Eucalyptus essential oil with amphotericin B showed a great decline in the MIC value of Eucalyptus essential oil alone against C. albicans, from 1000 to 31.25 μg/mL in the case of a combination [72]. Similarly, Bogavac et al. [16] showed the potent antifungal efficacy of essential oil as a promising alternative against vaginal C. albicans strains that were multidrug-resistant to conventional antifungals.

6. Eco-Friendly Approaches for Application of E. globulus

The efficiency of E. globulus for protecting plants from undesirable impacts of heavy metals and invasive plants as well as insects have been recognized as an efficient alternative for controlling weed growth, insects, and extracting pollutants from contaminated soil. This could be considered as an environmentally benign method.
For enhancing the ability of plants for phytoextraction, Luo et al. [79] recommended the replanting of E. globulus as an appropriate method for removing cadmium from the contaminated soil via root removal during every harvest, rather than following the coppicing system, regardless of the elevated cost of replanting. This also reduced the phytoremediation time, considering that the greatest amount of heavy metals will be absorbed by the Eucalyptus roots as a non-metabolically active component. Additionally, in the observations outlined by Luo et al. [79,80,81], E. globulus had potent heavy metal phytoremediation due to its fast growth and high above-ground biomass, as well as its ability to decline the physiological damage through aggregation of toxic materials in the less sensitive parts, as compared to the metabolically active parts. Likewise, the E. globulus trees could accumulate cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb), which made them potential candidates for the efficient capture of heavy metals from contaminated areas [82]. In recent times, Reboredo et al. [17] stated that E. globulus was able to remove arsenic from plantations close to mining activities and its root system was considered to be the greatest organ for accumulation, although translocation to the above-ground organs is poor. This promoted the phytoremediation efficacy of Eucalyptus plants as cost effective and provided an efficient process for removing heavy metals from contaminated lands; thus, it could help to counteract the limitations of conventional methods in the heavy metal elimination process.
For the phototoxic effect of E. globulus, the leaf methanolic extract had greater allelopathic activity, and accordingly, it diminished the percentage of germination, the germination rate, root and shoot growth, and the fresh and dry weights of eggplant, than the other extracts used [49]. In addition, Morsi and Abdelmigid [51] proved the allelopathic activity of the Eucalyptus aqueous leaf extract via the inhibition of seed germination, and the seedling growth of the Hordeum vulgare plants was ascribed to the presence of phytotoxic phenolics in the leaf extract.
Implementation of the Eucalyptus allelopathic properties in weed management will ameliorate the herbicide resistance resulting from the excessive application of synthetic herbicides; additionally, this strategy will maximize crop production by suppressing weeds that compete with crops for the same resources. With regard to this concern, Puig et al. [83,84] stated that the incorporation of E. globulus residues into the soil as green manure will diminish synthetic herbicide usage, especially in organic farming, to control weeds, as an environmental friendly practice. A leaf extract with an allelopathic potential can be used as a natural promising bioherbicide to inhibit both broad and narrow leaf weeds associated with the pea plant [50]. Furthermore, the leaf aqueous extract adversely influences the germination and seedling growth of teff and barley plants, as compared to the juvenile stem and root extracts [85]. Therefore, the allelopathic compatibility between crops and Eucalyptus trees must be essentially checked to avoid the potential adverse effects of trees on the associated crops. Additionally, the aqueous extract of the oven-dried leaves has a herbicidal potential as a biocide against the widespread weed of Portulaca oleracea L., which is attributable to the existence of a significant amount of allelochemicals [86]. The above-mentioned results recommend that the bioactive compounds present in Eucalyptus plants must be further investigated in weed control, as bioherbicides, with possible commercial applications.
The essential oil of Eucalyptus is considered to be a good ecological choice for maintaining the vase-life quality of “Carola” roses. This will help to overcome the use of toxic pesticides, as a routine procedure after harvest, of rose growers, which causes an undesirable impact on the environment and humans as well, as it can increase pathogen resistance [87]. In addition, the insecticidal activity of Eucalyptus essential oil has been previously assessed against the housefly [36], Musca domestica L. [38,88], Culexpipiens [37], and Myzuspersicae [66]. Furthermore, Eucalyptus essential oil and Co2 extract showed chronic toxicity and antifeedant efficiency against Leptinotarsa decemlineata [6]. Additionally, the nanocapsule formulation of hydroalcoholic leaf extracts exhibited repellent and biocidal activities against Aphis fabae [89]. Therefore, essential oil and plant extracts could be used as botanical insecticides, repellents, as well as fumigants, instead of chemical insecticides, due to their non-phytotoxic activity. Seemingly, the use of these natural insecticides is a promising approach for dealing with the emerging problem of insect resistance, potential toxicity to non-target insects as well as the environmental pollution caused due to excessive insecticide applications. On account of the increasing advocacy of organic agriculture in many countries, including Egypt, additional investigations on the possibility of using Eucalyptus plant parts, as well as their essential oils, in organic farming should be undertaken to enrich the quality of agricultural products, which will be reflected in the environment and human health.

7. Future Perspectives

The above-mentioned encouraging results support the use of different E. globulus plant part extracts, as well as their essential oils, as antioxidant and antimicrobial agents that stimulate further clinical trials, which should be implemented to confirm the aforementioned findings for further medical purposes. For a deep understanding of all the bioactive compound mechanisms involved in all the studied bioactivities, further trials should be implemented to explore the synergistic or antagonistic interactions among the complex mixtures of essential oils. In addition, the mechanism of action after the combination of oils and conventional antibiotics, which may influence multiple targets at the same time, should be investigated more thoroughly.
Additional studies are warranted to counteract the poor penetration of natural antimicrobial agents into the microorganism biofilm matrix, which can be achieved through nanocarriers. However, in the case of using biosynthesized nanoparticles, further investigation will be needed to demonstrate the impact of their cytotoxicity, with emphasis on optimizing the separation processes of the phenolic compounds, with detailed chemical characterization for possible extract quality improvement. Taking into consideration implementation of the available information on the effect of Eucalyptus essential oil and its extracts on the antimicrobial potency, it will be considered a great alternative to combat the resistance problem. Furthermore, the potent antimicrobial, herbicidal, and insecticidal activities of essential oil and plant parts should be transformed into commercial products.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.Y.S. and M.A.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.Y.S.; writing—review and editing, A.Y.S. and M.A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Goldbeck, J.C.; Do Nascimento, J.E.; Jacob, R.G.; Fiorentini, M.Â.; Da Silva, W.P. Bioactivity of essential oils from Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus urograndis against planktonic cells and biofilms of Streptococcus mutans. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 60, 304–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pereira, V.; Dias, C.; Vasconcelos, M.C.; Rosa, E.; Saavedra, M.J. Antibacterial activity and synergistic effects between Eucalyptus globulus leaf residues (essential oils and extracts) and antibiotics against several isolates of respiratory tract infections (Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 52, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mulyaningsih, S.; Sporer, F.; Reichling, J.; Wink, M. Antibacterial activity of essential oils from Eucalyptus and of selected components against multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens. Pharm. Biol. 2011, 49, 893–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Joshi, A.; Sharma, A.; Bachheti, R.K.; Pandey, D.P. A comparative study of the chemical composition of the essential oil from Eucalyptus globulus growing in Dehradun (India) and around the world. Orient. J. Chem. 2016, 32, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Boukhatem, M.N.; Amine, F.M.; Kameli, A.; Saidi, F.; Walid, K.; Mohamed, S.B. Quality assessment of the Essential oil from Eucalyptus globulus Labill of Blida (Algeria) origin. Int. Lett. Chem. Phys. Astron. 2014, 17, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Topiar, M.; Sajfrtova, M.; Pavela, R.; Machalova, Z. Comparison of fractionation techniques of CO2 extracts from Eucalyptus globulus—Composition and insecticidal activity. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2015, 97, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fabiyi, O.A.; Atolani, O.; Olatunji, G.A. Toxicity effect of Eucalyptus globulus on Pratylenchus spp. of Zea mays. Sarhad J. Agric. 2020, 36, 1244–1253. [Google Scholar]
  8. Derwich, E.; Benziane, Z.; Chabir, R.; Bouseta, A. Antifungal activity and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) leaf oil analysis of essential oils extracted from Eucalyptus globulus (Myrtaceae) of north centre region of Morocco. Afr. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2013, 7, 1157–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Damjanović-Vratnica, B.; Dakov, T.; Šuković, D.; Damjanović, J. Antimicrobial effect of essential oil isolated from Eucalyptus globulus Labill. from Montenegro. Czech J. Food Sci. 2011, 29, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Göger, G.; Karaca, N.; Altınbaşak, B.B.; Demirc, B.; Demirci, F. In vitro antimicrobial, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory evaluation of Eucalyptus globulus essential oil. Nat. Volatiles Essent. Oils 2020, 7, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  11. Abdossi, V.; Moghaddam, E.Y.; Hadipanah, A. Chemical Composition of Eucalyptus globulus grown in Iran. Biol. Forum 2015, 7, 322–324. [Google Scholar]
  12. Quatrin, P.M.; Verdi, C.M.; de Souza, M.E.; de Godoi, S.N.; Klein, B.; Gundel, A.; Wagner, R.; de Almeida Vaucher, R.; Ourique, A.F.; Santos, R.C.V. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities of nanoemulsions containing Eucalyptus globulus oil against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida spp. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 112, 230–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Luís, Â.; Duarte, A.; Gominho, J.; Domingues, F.; Duarte, A.P. Chemical composition, antioxidant, antibacterial and anti-quorum sensing activities of Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus radiata essential oils. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 79, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mekonnen, A.; Yitayew, B.; Tesema, A.; Taddese, S. In vitro antimicrobial activity of essential oil of Thymus schimperi, Matricaria chamomilla, Eucalyptus globulus and Rosmarinus officinalis. Int. J. Microbiol. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Bachheti, R.K. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of the essential oil from the leaves of Eucalyptus globulus collected from Haramaya University, Ethiopia. Der Pharma Chem. 2015, 7, 209–214. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bogavac, M.; Tešanović, K.; Marić, J.; Jovanović, M.; Karaman, M. Antimicrobial activity and toxicity of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. essential oil against vaginal microorganisms. Trends Phytochem. Res. 2019, 3, 201–206. [Google Scholar]
  17. Reboredo, F.H.; Pelica, J.; Lidon, F.C.; Pessoa, M.F.; Silva, M.M.; Guerra, M.; Leitão, R.; Ramalho, J.C. The tolerance of Eucalyptus globulus to soil contamination with arsenic. Plants 2021, 10, 627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Troncoso, C.; Becerra, J.; Bittner, M.; Perez, C.; Sáez, K.; Sánchez-Olate, M.; Ríos, D. Chemical defense responses in Eucalyptus globulus (Labill) plants. J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 2011, 56, 768–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Ishnava, K.B.; Chauhan, J.B.; Barad, M.B. Anticariogenic and phytochemical evaluation of Eucalyptus globules Labill. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2013, 20, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Harkat-Madouri, L.; Asma, B.; Madani, K.; Said, Z.B.-O.S.; Rigou, P.; Grenier, D.; Allalou, H.; Remini, H.; Adjaoud, A.; Boulekbache-Makhlouf, L. Chemical composition, antibacterial and antioxidant activities of essential oil of Eucalyptus globulus from Algeria. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 78, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pino, J.A.; Moncayo-molina, L.; Spengler, I.; Pérez, J.C. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of the leaf essential oil of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. from two highs of the canton Cañar, Ecuador. Rev. CENIC Ciencias Químicas 2021, 52, 26–33. [Google Scholar]
  22. Almas, I.; Innocent, E.; Machumi, F.; Kisinza, W. Chemical composition of essential oils from Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus maculata grown in Tanzania. Sci. Afr. 2021, 12, e00758. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tomazoni, E.Z.; Pauletti, G.F.; da Silva Ribeiro, R.T.; Moura, S.; Schwambach, J. In vitro and in vivo activity of essential oils extracted from Eucalyptus staigeriana, Eucalyptus globulus and Cinnamomum camphora against Alternaria solani Sorauer causing early blight in tomato. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 223, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kassahun, A.; Feleke, G. Chemical composition and physico-chemical analysis of Eucalyptus globulus leave and oil. Sci. J. Chem. 2019, 7, 36–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ait-ouazzou, A.; Conchello, P. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oils of Thymus algeriensis, Eucalyptus globulus and Rosmarinus officinalis from Morocco. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2011, 91, 2643–2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Benabdesslem, Y.; Hachem, K.; Mébarki, M. Chemical composition of the essential oil from the leaves of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. growing in southwest Algeria. J. Essent. Oil-Bearing Plants 2020, 23, 1154–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Akolade, J.O.; Olajide, O.O.; Afolayan, M.O.; Akande, S.A.; Idowu, D.I.; Orishadipe, A.T. Chemical composition, antioxidant and cytotoxic effects of Eucalyptus globulus grown in north-central Nigeria. J. Nat. Prod. Plant Resour. 2012, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  28. Dixit, A.; Rohilla, A.; Dixit, J.; Singh, V. Antimicrobail activity of volatile oil of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. Int. J. Adv. Pharm. Biol. Chem. 2014, 3, 384–387. [Google Scholar]
  29. Dohare, S.; Dubey, S.D.; Kalia, M.; Verma, P.; Pandey, H.; Singh, N.K.; Agarwal, V. Anti-biofilm activity of Eucalyptus globulus oil encapsulated silica nanoparticles against E. coli biofilm. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2014, 5, 5011–5016. [Google Scholar]
  30. Jamil, K.; Asmuddin, M.; Ranawat, B.; Rao, C. Estimation of antibacterial activity of plants extracts from Phyllanthus emblica, Terminalia chebula and Eucalyptus globulus against oral pathogens. Int. J. Dent. Oral Heal 2017, 3, 100–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Sharma, A.D.; Farmaha, M.; Kaur, I.; Singh, N. Phytochemical analysis using GC-FID, FPLC fingerprinting, antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti- inflammatory activities analysis of traditionally used Eucalyptus globulus essential oil. Drug Anal. Res. 2021, 5, 26–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Noumi, E.; Snoussi, M.; Bakhrouf, A. In vitro effect of Melaleuca alternifolia and Eucalyptus globulus essential oils on mycelia formation by oral Candida albicans strains. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2010, 4, 1332–1336. [Google Scholar]
  33. Obeizi, Z.; Benbouzid, H.; Ouchenane, S.; Yılmaz, D.; Culha, M.; Bououdina, M. Biosynthesis of Zinc oxide nanoparticles from essential oil of Eucalyptus globulus with antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activities. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 25, 101553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Usman, L.A.; Oguntoye, O.S.; Ismaeel, R.O. Effect of seasonal variation on chemical composition, antidiabetic and antioxidant potentials of leaf essential oil of Eucalyptus globulus L. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2020, 23, 1314–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jerbi, A.; Derbali, A.; Elfeki, A.; Kammoun, M. Essential oil composition and biological activities of Eucalyptus globulus leaves extracts from Tunisia. J. Essent. Oil-Bearing Plants 2017, 20, 438–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ebadollahi, A.; Safaralizadeh, M.H.; Pourmirza, A.A.; Ghosta, Y. Contact and fumigant toxicity of essential oils of Lavandula stoechas L. and Eucalyptus globulus Labill grown in Iran against Lasioderma serricorne F. Biharean Biol. 2010, 4, 31–36. [Google Scholar]
  37. Elzayyat, E.; Elleboudy, N.; Moustafa, A.; Ammar, A. Insecticidal, oxidative, and genotoxic activities of Syzygium aromaticum and Eucalyptus globulus on Culex pipiens adults and larvae. Turk. Parazitol. Derg 2018, 42, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kumar, P.; Mishra, S.; Malik, A.; Satya, S. Compositional analysis and insecticidal activity of Eucalyptus globulus (family: Myrtaceae) essential oil against housefly (Musca domestica). Acta Trop. 2012, 122, 212–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Madreseh-ghahfarokhi, S.; Pirali, Y.; Dehghani-samani, A.; Dehghani-samani, A. The insecticidal and repellent activity of ginger (Zingiber officinale) and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) essential oils against Culex theileri Theobald, 1903 (Diptera: Culicidae). Ann. Parasitol. 2018, 64, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Dehghani-Samani, A.; Madreseh-Ghahfarokhi, S.; Dehghani-Samani, A.; Pirali-Kheirabadi, K. Acaricidal and repellent activities of essential oil of Eucalyptus globulus against Dermanyssus gallinae (Acari: Mesostigmata). J. HerbMed Pharmacol. 2015, 4, 81–84. [Google Scholar]
  41. Taur, D.J.; Kulkarni, V.B.; Patil, R.Y. Chromatographic evaluation and anthelmintic activity of Eucalyptus globulus oil. Pharmacogn. Res. 2010, 2, 125–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Vigo, E.; Cepeda, A.; Perez-Fernandez, R.; Gualillo, O. In-vitro anti-inflammatory effect of Eucalyptus globulus and Thymus vulgaris: Nitric oxide inhibition in J774A. 1 murine macrophages. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2004, 56, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mulyaningsih, S.; Sporer, F.; Zimmermann, S.; Reichling, J.; Wink, M. Synergistic properties of the terpenoids aromadendrene and 1,8-cineole from the essential oil of Eucalyptus globulus against antibiotic-susceptible and antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Phytomedicine 2010, 17, 1061–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bey-Ould Si Said, Z.; Haddadi-Guemghar, H.; Boulekbache-Makhlouf, L.; Rigou, P.; Remini, H.; Adjaoud, A.; Khoudja, N.K.; Madani, K. Essential oils composition, antibacterial and antioxidant activities of hydrodistillated extract of Eucalyptus globulus fruits. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 89, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ferreira, C.d.S.; Pereyra, A.; Patriarca, A.; Mazzobre, M.F.; Polak, T.; Abram, V.; Buera, M.P.; Ulrih, N.P. Phenolic compounds in extracts from Eucalyptus globulus leaves and Calendula officinalis flowers. J. Nat. Prod. Resour. 2016, 2, 53–57. [Google Scholar]
  46. Nile, S.H.; Keum, Y.S. Chemical composition, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antitumor activities of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2018, 56, 734–742. [Google Scholar]
  47. Ita, B.N. Antioxidant activity of Eucalyptus globulus Labill root extracts. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2020, 9, 190–194. [Google Scholar]
  48. Tola, A.T.; Egigu, M.C.; Egdu, B.H. Bio-efficacy of crude leaf extracts of Eucalyptus globulus against in vitro and in vivo growth of chocolate spot (Botrytis fabae Sard.) of Faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Plant 2016, 4, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dejam, M.; Khaleghi, S.K.; Ataollahi, R. Allelopathic effects of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. on seed germination and seedling growth of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Int. J. Farming Allied Sci. 2014, 3, 81–86. [Google Scholar]
  50. El-Rokiek, K.G.; Saad El-Din, S.A. Allelopathic activity of Eucalyptus globulus leaf water extract on Pisum sativum growth, yield and associated weeds. Middle East J. Appl. Sci. 2017, 07, 907–913. [Google Scholar]
  51. Morsi, M.M.; Abdelmigid, H.M. Allelopathic activity of Eucalyptus globulus leaf aqueous extract on Hordeum vulgare growth and cytogenetic behaviour. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2016, 10, 1551–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ajilore, B.S.; Oluwadairo, T.O.; Olorunnisola, O.S.; Fadahunsi, O.S.; Adegbola, P.I. GC–MS analysis, toxicological and oral glucose tolerance assessments of methanolic leaf extract of Eucalyptus globulus. Futur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 7, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Narasimha, V.R.; Latha, T.S.; Pallu, R.; Panati, K.; Narala, V.R. Anticancer activities of biogenic silver nanoparticles targeting apoptosis and inflammatory pathways in colon cancer cells. J. Clust. Sci. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gullón, B.; Gullón, P.; Lú-Chau, T.A.; Moreira, M.T.; Lema, J.M.; Eibes, G. Optimization of solvent extraction of antioxidants from Eucalyptus globulus leaves by response surface methodology: Characterization and assessment of their bioactive properties. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 108, 649–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bencheikh, D.; Gueddah, A.; Soualat, K.; Ben-aissi, H.; Benslama, A.; Harrar, A.; Khennouf, S. Polyphenolic contents, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of aqueous extracts of Eucalyptus globulus L. and Trigonella foenum-greacum L. J. Appl. Biol. Sci. 2021, 15, 53–63. [Google Scholar]
  56. González-Burgos, E.; Liaudanskas, M.; Viškelis, J.; Žvikas, V.; Janulis, V.; Gómez-Serranillos, M.P. Antioxidant activity, neuroprotective properties and bioactive constituents analysis of varying polarity extracts from Eucalyptus globulus leaves. J. Food Drug Anal. 2018, 26, 1293–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Luís, A.; Neiva, D.; Pereira, H.; Gominho, J.; Domingues, F.; Duarte, A.P. Stumps of Eucalyptus globulus as a source of antioxidant and antimicrobial polyphenols. Molecules 2014, 19, 16428–16446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Djenane, D.; Yangüela, J.; Amrouche, T.; Boubrit, S.; Boussad, N.; Roncalés, P. Chemical composition and antimicrobial effects of essential oils of Eucalyptus globulus, Myrtus communis and Satureja hortensis against Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Staphylococcus aureus in minced beef. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2011, 17, 505–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hafsa, J.; ali Smach, M.; Ben Khedher, M.R.; Charfeddine, B.; Limem, K.; Majdoub, H.; Rouatbi, S. Physical, antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of chitosan films containing Eucalyptus globulus essential oil. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 68, 356–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Obiorah, S.; Eze, E.; Obiorah, D.; Orji, N.; Umedum, C. Phytochemical and antimicrobial studies on the extracts from leaves of Cajanus cajan and Eucalyptus globulus. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Environment, Chemistry and Biology, Singapore, 17–18 March 2012; Volume 49, pp. 192–197. [Google Scholar]
  61. Boulekbache-makhlouf, L.; Slimani, S.; Madani, K. Antioxidant effects and phytochemical analysis of crude and chromatographic fractions obtained from Eucalyptus globulus bark. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 10048–10055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Rodrigues, V.H.; de Melo, M.M.R.; Portugal, I.; Silva, C.M. Extraction of Eucalyptus leaves using solvents of distinct polarity. Cluster analysis and extracts characterization. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2018, 135, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. De Melo, M.M.R.; Oliveira, E.L.G.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Silva, C.M. Supercritical fluid extraction of triterpenic acids from Eucalyptus globulus bark. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2012, 70, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Domingues, R.M.A.; Sousa, G.D.A.; Freire, C.S.R.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Neto, C.P. Eucalyptus globulus biomass residues from pulping industry as a source of high value triterpenic compounds. Ind. Crops Prod. 2010, 31, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Noumi, E.; Snoussi, M.; Hajlaoui, H.; Trabelsi, N.; Ksouri, R.; Valentin, E.; Bakhrouf, A. Chemical composition, antioxidant and antifungal potential of Melaleuca alternifolia(tea tree) and Eucalyptus globulus essential oils against oral Candida species. J. Med. Plants Res. 2011, 5, 4147–4156. [Google Scholar]
  66. Khoshraftar, Z.; Safekordi, A.A.; Shamel, A.; Zaefizadeh, M. Synthesis of natural nanopesticides with the origin of Eucalyptus globulus extract for pest control. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2019, 12, 286–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Vazquez, G.; Santos, J.; Freire, M.S.; Antorrena, G.; Gonza’lez-Alvarez, J. Extraction of antioxidants from eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) bark. Wood Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 443–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sharma, A.D.; Kaur, I. By-product hydrosol of Eucalyptus globulus essential oil distillation as source of botanical insecticides: Wealth from waste. Not. Sci. Biol. 2021, 13, 10854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mota, I.; Pinto, P.C.R.; Novo, C.; Sousa, G.; Guerreiro, O.; Guerra, Â.R.; Duarte, M.F.; Rodrigues, A.E. Eucalyptus globulus bark as source of polyphenolic compounds with biological activity. In Proceedings of the 45th ABTCP International Pulp and Paper Congress and VII IberoAmerican Congress on Pulp and Paper Research, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 9–11 October 2012; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  70. Lourenço, A.; Marques, A.V.; Gominho, J. The identification of new triterpenoids in Eucalyptus globulus wood. Molecules 2021, 26, 3495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Mączka, W.; Duda-Madej, A.; Górny, A.; Grabarczyk, M.; Wińska, K. Can eucalyptol replace antibiotics? Molecules 2021, 26, 4933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Salem, N.; Kefi, S.; Tabben, O.; Ayed, A.; Jallouli, S.; Feres, N.; Hammami, M.; Khammassi, S.; Hrigua, I.; Nefisi, S.; et al. Variation in chemical composition of Eucalyptus globulus essential oil under phenological stages and evidence synergism with antimicrobial standards. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018, 124, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Boulekbache-makhlouf, L.; Slimani, S.; Madani, K. Total phenolic content, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of fruits of Eucalyptus globulus cultivated in Algeria. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 41, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Bachir, R.G.; Benali, M. Antibacterial activity of the essential oils from the leaves of Eucalyptus globulus against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2012, 2, 739–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Esmaeili, D.; Mobarez, A.M.; Tohidpour, A. Anti-Hlicobacter pylori Activities of shoya powder and essential oils of Thymus vulgaris and Eucalyptus globulus. Open Microbiol. J. 2012, 6, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Djelloul, R.; Mokrani, K.; Hacini, N. Study of the antibacterial activity of the extract from the essential oil of Eucalyptus globulus and Rosmarinus officinalis on three bacterial strains. Int. J. Appl. Environ. Sci. 2017, 12, 47–56. [Google Scholar]
  77. Limam, H.; Ben Jemaa, M.; Tammar, S.; Ksibi, N.; Khammassi, S.; Jallouli, S.; Del Re, G.; Msaada, K. Variation in chemical profile of leaves essential oils from thirteen Tunisian Eucalyptus species and evaluation of their antioxidant and antibacterial properties. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 158, 112964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Merghni, A.; Noumi, E.; Hadded, O.; Dridi, N.; Panwar, H.; Ceylan, O.; Mastouri, M.; Snoussi, M. Assessment of the antibiofilm and antiquorum sensing activities of Eucalyptus globulus essential oil and its main component 1,8-cineole against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 118, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Luo, J.; Qi, S.; Peng, L.; Xie, X. Phytoremediation potential of cadmium-contaminated soil by Eucalyptus globulus under different coppice systems. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2015, 94, 321–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Luo, J.; Qi, S.; Peng, L.; Wang, J. Phytoremediation efficiency of CD by Eucalyptus globulus transplanted from polluted and unpolluted sites. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2016, 18, 308–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Luo, J.; Qi, S.; Peng, L.; Xie, X. Enhanced phytoremediation capacity of a mixed-species plantation of Eucalyptus globulus and Chickpeas. J. Geochem. Explor. 2017, 182, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. El-Khatib, A.A.; Youssef, N.A.; Barakat, N.A.; Samir, N.A. Responses of Eucalyptus globulus and Ficus nitida to different potential of heavy metal air pollution. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2020, 22, 986–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Puig, C.G.; Revilla, P.; Barreal, M.E.; Reigosa, M.J.; Pedrol, N. On the suitability of Eucalyptus globulus green manure for field weed control. Crop Prot. 2019, 121, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Puig, C.G.; Álvarez-Iglesias, L.; Reigosa, M.J.; Pedrol, N. Eucalyptus globulus leaves incorporated as green manure for weed control in maize. Weed Sci. 2013, 61, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Nega, F.; Gudeta, T.B. Allelopathic effect of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. on seed germination and seedling growth of highland teff (Eragrostis tef (Zuccagni) Trotter)) and barely (Hordeum vulgare L.). J. Exp. Agric. Int. 2019, 30, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Pinto, M.; Soares, C.; Martins, M.; Sousa, B.; Valente, I.; Pereira, R.; Fidalgo, F. Herbicidal effects and cellular targets of aqueous extracts from young Eucalyptus globulus Labill. Leaves. Plants 2021, 10, 1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Almeida, E.F.A.; Santos, L.O.; Castricini, A.; da Silva Reis, J.B.R. Eucalyptus globulus essential oil on the postharvest quality of “Carola” roses. Ornam. Hortic. 2020, 26, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Rani, N.; Harikrishnan, T.J.; Ponnudurai, G. In vitro insecticidal activity of essential oil of Eucalyptus globulus against Musca domestica. Indian Vet. J. 2016, 93, 25–27. [Google Scholar]
  89. Abdelkader, H.; Abdelkader, B.; Yahia, B. Toxicity and repellency of Eucalyptus globulus L. essential oil against Aphis fabae Scopoli, 1763 (Homoptera: Aphididae). J. Entomol. Res. 2020, 44, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Horticulturae 07 00450 g001 550
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the main components of Eucalyptus leaf and fruit essential oils.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the main components of Eucalyptus leaf and fruit essential oils.
Horticulturae 07 00450 g001
Table
Table 1. Phytochemical compounds reported in the different parts of E. globulus Labill.
Table 1. Phytochemical compounds reported in the different parts of E. globulus Labill.
Plant PartsMajor ConstituentsReferences
Leaves1,8-cineole (31.42%) and trans-3-carven-2-ol (10.10%), 2-Octen-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl (9.37), and Cis-p-Menth-2,8-dienol (6.33)[36]
Leaves1,8-cineole (86.51%), α-pinene
(4.74%), γ-terpinene (2.57%) and α-phellandrene (1.40%)		[3]
Leaves1,8-cineole (95.61%) and alpha-pinene (1.5%)[65]
Aerial parts1,8-cineole (79.85%), Limonene (6.72%), p-cymene (5.14%), and γ-terpinene (3.93%)[25]
Leaves1,8-cineole (85.8%), α-pinene (7.2%), and β-myrcene (1.5%)[9]
Leavesγ-terpinene (94.48%) and 1,8-cineole (3.20%)[58]
Leaves1,8-cineole (33.6%), α-pinene (14.2%), and d-limonene (10.1%)[38]
LeavesTerpinen-4-ol (23.46%), γ-terpinene (17.01%), pathulenol (8.94%), ρ-ymene (8.10%) and ρ-cymen-7-ol (6.39 %), globulol (2.52%), and α-phellandrene (2.20%)[27]
Leaves1,8-cineole (22.35%), limonene (7.01%), solanol (6.05%), β-pinene (5.20%), trans-verbenol (4.02%), and terpinen-4-ol (3.10%)[8]
Leaves1,8 cineole (51.08%), α-pinene (24.60%), L-pinocarveol (9.98%), and globulol (2.81)[5]
Leaves1,8-Cineole (71.05%) and α-pinene (8.30%)[1]
LeavesPhenolics (quercetin and luteolin)[2]
Leaves1,8-cineole (76.65%), α-pinene (5.65%), α-terpineol acetate (4.85%), and alloaromadendrene (3.98%)[11]
Leaves1,8-cineole (62.38%), α-pinene (23.79%), α-terpinyl acetate (5.41%), globulol (1.68%), and β-pinene (1.1%)[15]
Leaves1,8-cineole (55.29%), spathulenol (7.44%), and α-terpineol (5.46%)[20]
Leaves1,8-cineole (36.68%), β-pinene (9.25%), aromedendrene (6.33%), and globulol (5.11%)[6]
LeavesChlorogenic acid, rutin, and quercetin 3-glucuronide and ellagic acid derivatives[45]
Leaves1,8-cineole (54.79%), β-pinene (18.54%), α-pinene (11.46%), β-eudesmol (4.68%), α-phellandrene (2.06%), para cymene (1.60%), and gamma-eudesmol (1.20%)[4]
Leavesp-Cymene (18.18%), methyl eugenol (8.83%), 4-Terpinenol (8.45%), s-methyl 3-methylbutanethioate (7.26%), g-terpinene (5.12%), and 1,8-cineole (3.16%).[59]
leaves and small branches1,8-cineole (63.81%), α-pinene (16.06%), aromadendrene (3.68%), and o-cymene (2.35%)[13]
Leaves1,8-cineole (63.00%), α-pinene (16.10%), and camphor (3.42%)[14]
Leaves1,8-cineole (48.2%), α-pinene (16.1%), γ-terpinene (8.9%) and p-cymene (8.8%)[35]
Leaves1,8-cineole (75.8%), p-cymene (7.5%), α-pinene (7.4%), and limonene (6.4%)[12]
Leaves1,8-cineole (69.32%), camphene (9.41%), α-pinene (7.48%), and α-terpineol (5.08%)[23]
Leaves1,8-cineole (46.76%), D-limonene (9.61%), and o-cymene (6.49%)[37]
LeavesPhenolic compounds (quercetin, luteolin, kaempferol, iso-rhamnetin, phloretin, chlorogenic acid)[56]
Leaves1,8-cineole, phenolic acids (Gallic acid, ellagic acid, vanillic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, p-coumaric acid, and quercetin), phenolics (catechin, rutin, and luteolin)[46]
Leaves1,8-cineole (70.94%), 3-cyclohexene-1-ol (3.13%), beta. fenchyl (5.38%), 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid (6.08%), dodecane (1.50%)[66]
LeavesEucalyptol (59.63%), p-cymene (15.55%), and DL-limonene (14.90%)[16]
LeavesEucalyptol (55.43%), α-pinene (25.55%), and D-limonene (5.687%)[24]
Leaves1,8-cineol (56.83%), L-pinocarveol (10.42%), α-pinene (9.47%), globulol (7.68%), and carvacrol (1.59%)[33]
Leavesp-cymene (20.24%), spathulenol (14.10%), and eucalyptol (11.30%)[26]
Leaves1,8-cineole (23.3%), citronellal (18.1%), geranial (17.6%), isopulegol (10.4%), myrcene (13.0%), cuminaldehyde (9.1%), and 2-pinene (8.5%)[7]
Leaves1,8-cineole (80.2%), p-cymene (6.6%), and limonene (5%)[10]
LeavesD-limonene (23.5%), m-cymene (24.8%), o- cymene (9.9 and 5.4%), 6-camphenol (7.2 and 10.7%), terpinen-4-ol (5.2 and 4.5%), and globulol (4.0 and 12.9%)[34]
LeavesEucalyptol (51.62%), α-pinene (23.62%), p-cymene (10%), β-myrcene (8.74%), terpinen-4-ol (2.74%), and γ-terpinene (2.59%)[22]
Leaves1,8-cineol (67.4 and 67.6%) and α-pinene (12.8 and 13.1%)[21]
FruitsAromadendrene (31.17%), 1,8-cineole (14.55%), globulol (10.69%), and ledene (7.13%)[43]
FruitsGlobulol (23.6%), aromadendrene (19.7%), 1,8-cineole (19.8%), and α-pinene (3.8%)[44]
BarkPolyphenol and tannin[61]
Deciduous barkFatty acids, aliphatic alcohols, sterols, and triterpenoids[63]
BarkPolygalloyl glucoses (gallotannins), catechin, epicatechin, ellagic acid, quercetin-3-o-rhamnoside, and isorhamnetin (phenolic compounds)[67]
StumpPhenolic compounds and flavonoids[57]
Table
Table 2. Antibacterial activities reported in different parts of E. globulus Labill.
Table 2. Antibacterial activities reported in different parts of E. globulus Labill.
Plant PartsSolvent UsedMethod UsedTarget SpeciesReferences
LeavesEssential oilAgar diffusion techniqueStaphylococcus aureus CECT 4459
Escherichia coli O157:H7 CECT 4267		[58]
Aerial partsEssential oilDisc diffusion assaySalmonella enteritidis (CECT 4155)
Escherichia coli (CECT 4267)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CECT 110)
Staphylococcus aureus (CECT 239)
Enterococcus faecium (CECT 239)
Listeria monocytogenes (CECT 935)
Listeria monocytogenes EGD-e		[25]
LeavesEssential oilAgar disc
diffusion method		Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923
Escherichia coli ATCC 25922
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853
Phylococcus aureus
Escherichia coli
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
klebsiella pneumoniae
Proteus mirabilis
Streptococcus pyogenes
Morganella morganii
Providencia stuartii
Enterobacter cloacae
Acinetobacter baumannii
Citrobacter freundii
Salmonella infantis		[9]
LeavesEssential oilAgar disc diffusion and dilution broth methodsEscherichia coli
Staphylococcus aureus		[74]
LeavesEssential oilAgar dilution methodHelicobacter pylori ATCC 700392[75]
LeavesMethanol
extract		Cup-plate methodStaphylococcus aureus
Bacillus subtilis		[60]
LeavesEthyl acetateAgar well diffusion methodLactobacillus acidophilus (MTCC-*447)
Lactobacillus casei (MTCC-1423)
Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC-890)
Streptococcus mutans (MTCC-96)		[19]
FruitsAqueous methanol (80%)Disc diffusion methodStaphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538
Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633
Klebsiella pneumoniae E 47		[73]
LeavesOil encapsulated silica nanoparticleAgar well diffusion methodEscherichia coli (ATCC 25922)[29]
LeavesEssential oilCylinder plate methodBacillus subtilis
Escherichia coli
Staphylococcus aureus
Pseudomonas aeruginosa		[28]
Stumpn-hexane, ethanol, methanol and 75% aqueous ethanolDisc diffusion assayStaphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 Bacillus cereus ATCC 11778
Listeria monocytogenes LMG 16779 Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212
Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853
Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883
S. aureus: SA 01/10, SA 02/10, SA 03/10 and SA 08
S. aureus: MRSA 10/08 and MRSA 12/08		[57]
LeavesMethanolic extractsDisk diffusion methodPseudomonas aeruginosa[2]
LeavesEssential oilAgar diffusion methodStreptococcus mutans (ATCC 700610)[1]
LeavesEssential oilAgar well diffusion methodStaphylococcus aureus (MTCC 3160), Staphylococcus epidermidis (MTCC 435)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MTCC 7453)
Klebsiella pneumonia (MTCC 4030)		[15]
LeavesEssential oilBroth microdilution methodFusobacterium nucleatum ATCC 25586
Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans ATCC 29522
Porphyromonas gingivalis ATCC 33277, ATCC 49417, HW24D1, and W83)
Streptococcus mutans ATCC 35668 ATCC 33535, ATCC 25175
S. sobrinus ATCC 33478, ATCC 27607 ATCC 27352		[20]
LeavesEssential oil incorporated into chitosan filmsAgar diffusion assayStaphylococcus aureus
Escherichia coli
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Klebsiella pneumonia		[59]
LeavesEssential oilAgar diffusion methodSalmonella typhi
Salmonella paratyphi
Salmonella typhimurium
Shigella species
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Staphylococcus aureus
Escherichia coli		[14]
Leaves and small branchesEssential oilDisc diffusion assayPseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853
E. coli ATCC 25922
K. pneumoniae ATCC 13883 Salmonella Typhimurium ATCC 13311
Acinetobacter baumannii LMG 1025 Acinetobacter baumannii LMG 1041
P. aeruginosa PA 08
P. aeruginosa PA 12/08
E. coli EC 08
K. pneumoniae KP 08		[13]
FruitsEssential oilAgar diffusion testStaphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300
Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633
Listeria innocua CLIP 74915
Escherichia coli ATCC 25922
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853		[44]
LeavesEssential oilDisk infusionEscherichia coli ATCC 25922 Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923[76]
LeavesAqueous, ethanol, and methanolAgar disc diffusion methodStaphylococcus aureus (MTCC 3160)
Escherichia coli (MTCC 1655) Streptococcus mutans (MTCC 890)		[30]
LeavesAqueous ethanolSerial dilution techniqueListeria innocua (NCTC 10528)
Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538) Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) Bacillus cereus (DSM 4313) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10145) Salmonella enteritidis (ATCC 3076)		[54]
LeavesNanoemulsions containing oilBroth microdilution techniquePseudomonas aeruginosa PA01[12]
Aerial partsEssential oilDisk diffusion methodStaphylococcus aureus ATCC 6816
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579 Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 19115 Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 Klebsiella pneumoniae CIP 104727 Salmonella enteridis DMB 560		[72]
LeavesEssential oilDouble-dilution micro-plate assayE. coli 1
E. coli 2
S. aureus 1
S. aureus 2
P. aeruginosa
P. mirabilis		[16]
LeavesEssential oilIn vitro microdilution methodPropionibacterium acnes ATCC 6919
P. acnes ATCC 11827
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538
S. epidermidis ATCC 12228		[10]
LeavesEssential oilAgar diffusion testEnterococcus hiare (ATCC 10,541)
Baccilus licheniformis (ATCC 8480)
Staphyllococcus aureus (ATCC 6538)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 9027)
Serratia marcescens (ATCC 13,880)
Escherchia coli (ATCC 8739)		[77]
LeavesZinc oxide nanoparticles from essential oil ofAgar well diffusion methodStaphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300 Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212
Escherichia coli ATCC 25922
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Salmonella enteritidis ATCC 13076 Salmonella typhimurium
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853
Acinetobacter baumannii		[33]
LeavesAqueous extractAgar disk diffusion methodStaphylococcus aureus ATCC 6536 Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633 Escherichia coli ATCC 8739[55]
LeavesEssential oilBroth microdilution methodStaphylococus aureus ATCC 25923
Streptococus pyogenes ATCC 28422
Eschericha coli		[21]
LeavesEssential oilAgar disc diffusion methodAcetobacter aceti
Pseudomonas aeruginosa MTCC 427
Escherichia coli MTCC 40
Bacillus subtilis MTCC 121 Staphylococcus aureus MTCC 3160 Saccharomyces cerevisiae		[31]
Table
Table 3. Antifungal activities reported in different parts of E. globulus Labill.
Table 3. Antifungal activities reported in different parts of E. globulus Labill.
Plant PartsSolvent UsedMethod UsedTarget SpeciesReferences
LeavesEssential oilMicro dilution methodCandida albicans ATCC 90028
Candida albicans 15B		[32]
leavesEssential oilAgar-well diffusion methodCandida spp.[65]
LeavesEssential oilBroth microdilution assayCandida albicans ATCC 10231[9]
LeavesMethanol extractCup-plate methodTrichophytor rubrum[60]
LeavesEssential oilCylinder plate methodAspergillus niger
Candida albicans		[28]
Stumpn-hexane, ethanol, methanol, and 75% aqueous ethanolDisc diffusion assayCandida albicans ATCC 90028
Candida tropicalis ATCC 750		[57]
LeavesEssential oil incorporated into chitosan filmsAgar diffusion assayCandida albicans
Candida parapsilosis		[59]
LeavesEssential oilAgar diffusion methodTrichophyton spp.
Aspergillus spp.		[14]
LeavesNanoemulsions containing oilBroth microdilution techniqueC. albicans (ATCC 14053)
C. tropicalis (ATCC 66029)
C. glabrata (ATCC 66032)		[12]
Aerial partsEssential oilDisk diffusion assayCandida albicans ATCC 10231[72]
LeavesEssential oilDouble-dilution micro-plate assayC. albicans1
C. albicans2		[16]
LeavesZinc oxide nanoparticles from essential oilAgar well diffusion methodCandida albicans[33]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shala, A.Y.; Gururani, M.A. Phytochemical Properties and Diverse Beneficial Roles of Eucalyptus globulus Labill.: A Review. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 450. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7110450

AMA Style

Shala AY, Gururani MA. Phytochemical Properties and Diverse Beneficial Roles of Eucalyptus globulus Labill.: A Review. Horticulturae. 2021; 7(11):450. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7110450

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shala, Awad Y., and Mayank Anand Gururani. 2021. "Phytochemical Properties and Diverse Beneficial Roles of Eucalyptus globulus Labill.: A Review" Horticulturae 7, no. 11: 450. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7110450

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop