Evaluation of Ornamental Traits and Their Associations with Genomic Simple Sequence Repeat Markers in Globba sherwoodiana
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Materials and DNA Extraction
2.2. Development of Whole-Genome gSSR Markers and Primer Design in G. sherwoodiana
2.3. gSSR Primer Screening and Hybrid Identification
2.4. Determination of Ornamental Traits in Hybrid Progenies
2.5. Data Processing and Analysis
- (1)
- Excel was used to calculate descriptive statistics, including maximum value, minimum value, mean value, and standard deviation, from the original data. Analysis of variance was performed using SPSS (SPSS 12.0), and bar charts and frequency-distribution plots were generated using Origin 2024.
- (2)
- GeneMapper v4.0 was used to determine the fragment sizes of SSR amplicons. PowerMarker v3.25 was used to calculate and evaluate the polymorphism levels of each marker locus [17].
- (3)
- TASSEL 4.0 software was used to conduct marker–trait association analysis using the mixed linear model (MLM). The kinship matrix (K matrix) calculated from the 27 SSR markers was included as a random effect to account for relatedness among individuals. A threshold of p < 0.01 was used to define significant associations, and the Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) correction (Q < 0.05) was subsequently applied to control for false positives [18,19].
3. Results
3.1. Number and Distribution Characteristics of Whole-Genome SSR Loci in G. sherwoodiana
3.2. Distribution of Whole-Genome SSR Loci on Different Chromosomes of G. sherwoodiana
3.3. Screening of Polymorphic gSSR Primers
3.4. Identification of Hybrid Progenies
3.5. Determination of Phenotypic Ornamental Traits in Hybrid Progenies
3.6. Association Analysis Between Ornamental Traits and gSSR Molecular Markers in Hybrid Progenies
4. Discussion
4.1. Development of Whole-Genome gSSR Molecular Markers in G. sherwoodiana
4.2. Genetic Diversity of Phenotypic Ornamental Traits
4.3. Association Analysis Between Phenotypic Traits and gSSR Markers
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Talip, N.; Basir, S.; Amri, C.N.A.C.; Ghazalli, M.N.; Zohar, A.F.; Juhari, M.A.A.A.; Rahman, M.R.A.; Bunawan, H. Taxonomic Significance of Leaf Anatomical Characteristics of Selected Globba L. (Zingiberaceae) Species in Peninsular Malaysia. Trop. Life Sci. Res. 2025, 36, 59–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Gowda, V.; Kress, W.J.; Htun, T. Two New Species of Gingers (Zingiberaceae) from Myanmar. PhytoKeys 2012, 13, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Doungchawee, J.; Kulsing, C.; Suekaew, N.; Pombejra, S.N.; Chavasir, W.; Plabutong, N.; Thammahong, A.; Khotavivattana, T. Volatile Chemical Composition, Antibacterial and Antifungal Activities of Extracts from Different Parts of Globba schomburgkii Hook. F. Chem. Biodivers. 2019, 16, e1900057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wang, Z.T.; Pan, Y.B.; Luo, J.; You, Q.; Xu, L.P.; Zhang, H.; Que, Y.X. SSR-based Genetic Identity of Sugarcane Clones and its Potential Application in Breeding and Variety Extension. Sugar Tech 2020, 22, 367–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Savadi, S.; Muralidhara, B.M.; Venkataravanappa, V.; Adiga, J.D.; Manjunatha, K.; Patil, B. De Novo Transcriptome Assembly and its Utility in Development and Characterization of the First Set of Genic SSR Markers in Cashew. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2022, 189, 115734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kalia, R.K.; Rai, M.K.; Kalia, S.; Singh, R.; Dhawan, A.K. Microsatellite Markers: An Overview of the Recent Progress in Plants. Euphytica 2011, 177, 309–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ye, Y.J.; Xu, Y.C.; Li, D.M.; Tan, J.J.; Liu, J.M. Characterization of EST-SSR Markers in Curcuma kwangsiensis S.K. Lee & C.F. Liang based on RNA Sequencing and its Application for Phylogenetic Relationship Analysis and Core Collection Construction. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 2021, 68, 1503–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ye, Y.J.; Fu, H.P.; Zhou, Y.W.; Zhang, S.X.; Wang, Z.H.; Tian, L.H.; Tan, J.J.; Zhu, G.F.; Liu, J.M.; Xu, Y.C. Establishment of DNA Molecular Fingerprint of Caladium Core Collections. Agriculture 2023, 13, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Varshney, R.K.; Graner, A.; Sorrells, M.E. Genic Microsatellite Markers in Plants: Features and Applications. Trends. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wang, L.N.; Gao, W.; Wang, Q.Y.; Qu, J.B.; Zhang, J.X.; Huang, C.Y. Identification of Commercial Cultivars of Agaricus bisporus in China Using Genome-wide Microsatellite Markers. J. Integr. Agr. 2019, 18, 580–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tao, L.L.; Ting, Y.J.; Chen, H.R.; Wen, H.L.; Hui, X.I.E.; Luo, L.Y.; Huang, K.L.; Zhu, J.Y.; Liu, S.R.; Wei, C.L. Core Collection Construction of Tea Plant Germplasm in Anhui Province Based on Genetic Diversity Analysis Using Simple Sequence Repeat Markers. J. Integr. Agr. 2023, 22, 2719–2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ye, Y.J.; Tan, J.J.; Lin, J.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, G.F.; Nie, C.R.; Huang, L.S.; Zhou, Y.W.; Xu, Y.C. Genome-wide Identification of SSR Markers for Curcuma alismatifolia Gagnep., and Their Potential for Wider Application in this Genus. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aroma. 2024, 42, 100572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hamm, T.P.; Boggess, S.L.; Kandel, J.S.; Staton, M.E.; Huff, M.L.; Hadziabdic, D.; Shoemaker, D.E.; Adamczyk, J.J.; Nowicki, M.; Trigiano, R.N. Development and Characterization of 20 Genomic SSR Markers for Ornamental Cultivars of Weigela. Plants 2022, 11, 1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Sunisa, S.; Tomáš, F.; Jessada, D.; Newman, M.F. Phylogeny of Globba Section Nudae and Taxonomic Revision of the New Globba Subsection Pelecantherae. Plant Syst. Evol. 2022, 308, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhou, Y.W.; Tan, J.J.; Huang, L.S.; Xu, Y.C.; Ye, Y.J. Decoding the Color Palette in the Ornamental Bracts of Globba spp.: Insights from Phenotypic, Metabolomic, and Transcriptomic Analyses. Planta 2025, 262, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Shen, J.S.; Liao, W.H.; Rong, X.L.; Wei, C.H.; Zhang, M.L. Characterization of the Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Globba racemosa Smith in the Family Zingiberaceae. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2026, 11, 237–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- An, X.; Luo, X.H.; Liu, T.T.; Li, W.L.; Zou, L.N. Development and Application of Fruit Color-related Expressed Sequence Tag-simple Sequence Repeat Markers in Abelmoschus esculentus on the Basis of Transcriptome Sequencing. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 907895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zuo, Q.M.; Wen, Z.X.; Zhang, S.Y.; Hou, J.F.; Gai, J.Y.; Yu, D.Y.; Xing, H. QTL Identification of the Insensitive Response to Photoperiod and Temperature in Soybean by Association Mapping. J. Integr. Agr. 2013, 12, 1423–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jaganathan, D.; Gibbs, J.M.; Thomas, N.; McAvoy, T.; Azad, M.; Tian, M.Y.; Lozada, N.D.; Railey, W.H.; Nankar, A.N. Morphological and Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR)-Based Diversity of Capsicum Germplasm Characterizes Population Structure and Enables Marker-Assisted Selection for Phytophthora Capsici Resistance. Euphytica 2026, 222, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Khan, H.; Sivalingam, P.N.; Chauhan, S.; Awasthi, O.P.; More, T.A. Improved Crossing Technique and Identification of True F1 Hybrids of Ziziphus Mauritiana Lam. by Molecular Markers. Sci. Hortic. 2013, 150, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Song, Q.J.; Shi, J.R.; Singh, S.; Fickus, E.W.; Costa, J.M.; Lewis, J.; Gill, B.S.; Ward, R.; Cregan, P.B. Development and Mapping of Microsatellite (SSR) Markers in Wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2005, 110, 550–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Xavier, A.; Gowda, V. Characterization of SSR Markers From Draft Genome Assembly and Genotypic Data in Hedychium spicatum (Zingiberaceae). Data Brief. 2024, 55, 110568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Shi, M.; Tanaka, K.; Rivera, M.P.; Thein, M.S.; Ngure, G.M.; Watanabe, K.N. Comprehensive SSR Study of 14 Zingiberaceae Species Based on Microsatellite Capture Sequencing (MiCAPs). Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1693622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Lawson, M.J.; Zhang, L.Q. Distinct Patterns of SSR Distribution in the Arabidopsis thaliana and Rice Genomes. Genome Biol. 2006, 7, R14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Tóth, G.; Gáspári, Z.; Jurka, J. Microsatellites in Different Eukaryotic Genomes: Survey and Analysis. Genome Res. 2000, 10, 967–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Hou, J.; Liu, M.; Yang, K.; Liu, B.; Liu, H.H.; Liu, J.Q. Genetic Variation for Adaptive evolution in Response to Changed Environments in Plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2025, 67, 2265–2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ye, Y.J.; Wu, J.Y.; Feng, L.; Ju, Y.Q.; Cai, M.; Cheng, T.R.; Pan, H.T.; Zhang, Q.X. Heritability and gene effects for plant architecture traits of crape myrtle using major gene plus polygene inheritance analysis. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 225, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, C.; Xu, H.; Li, Z.; Wang, Y.K.; Zhang, J.X.; Qiao, S.W.; Zhang, H. From Map to Blueprint: The Plant Pan-Genome Unraveling Genetic Mysteries and Powering Precision breeding. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1673637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Qu, L.Q.; Yuan, B.Y.; Wen, X.H.; Guo, J.; Luo, J.R.; Shi, X.H. Analysis of Phenotypic Diversity and Comprehensive Evaluation of 51 Helleborus L. Hybrid Individuals. Plants 2025, 14, 3226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Guo, Q.; Liu, J.; Li, J.K.; Cao, S.; Zhang, Z.J.; Zhang, J.T.; Zhang, Y.S.; Deng, Y.P.; Niu, D.S.; Su, L.Z.; et al. Genetic Diversity and Core Collection Extraction of Robinia pseudoacacia L. Germplasm Resources Based on Phenotype, Physiology, and Genotyping Markers. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2022, 178, 114627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, Y.P.; Liu, J.F.; Jing, L.H.; Ding, D.H.; Chang, W.; Cao, L.L.; Zhang, W.; Chen, J.B.; Yang, S.Q. Genetic diversity analysis of seed phenotypic traits of 302 mung bean germplasm resources. Cienc. Rural 2024, 54, e20230542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Osei, C.Y.; Lee, S.; Desta, K.T.; Kim, E.G.; Yoo, E.; Lee, J.E.; Lee, G.A. Diversity in agro-morphological traits and phytochemical content of amaranth germplasm. Hortic. Enviro. Biotechnol. 2026, 67, 235–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ma, Q.; Zhao, J.; Lin, H.; Ning, X.Z.; Liu, P.; Deng, F.J.; Si, A.J.; Li, J.L. Association Between SSR Markers and Fibre Traits in Sea Island Cotton (Gossypium barbadense) Germplasm Resources. J. Genet. 2017, 96, e55–e63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Abou-Elwafa, S.F. Association Mapping for Yield and Yield-Contributing Traits in Barley Under Drought Conditions With genome-Based SSR Markers. Comptes Rendus. Biol. 2016, 339, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ye, Y.J.; Zhou, Y.W.; Tan, J.J.; Liu, J.M.; Wan, X.X.; Jin, H.; Xu, Y.C. EST-SSR Markers Development and Association Analysis of Flowering Traits in Hemerocallis Accessions. Mol. Plant Breed. 2023, 1–17. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Ingvarsson, P.K.; Street, N.R. Association Genetics of Complex Traits in Plants. New Phytol. 2011, 189, 909–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Dwivedi, S.L.; Heslop-Harrison, P.; Amas, J.; Ortiz, R.; Edwards, D. Epistasis and Pleiotropy-Induced Variation for Plant Breeding. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2024, 22, 2788–2807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kumar, J.; Singh, P.; Ahmed, S.; Garg, N.; Sharma, H.; Singh, R.; Kumar, R.; Sheikh, I.; Roy, J. Genotype × Environment Interaction, Marker-Trait Association, and SSR Validation for Grain Micronutrient Content and Yield in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Cereal Sci. 2025, 124, 104227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Apotikar, D.B.; Venkateswarlu, D.; Ghorade, R.B.; Wadaska, R.M.; Patil, J.V.; Kulwal, P.L. Mapping of Shoot Fly Tolerance Loci in Sorghum Using SSR Markers. J. Genet. 2011, 90, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]




| Primer | Number of Alleles (Na) | Effective Number of Alleles (Ne) | Observed Heterozygosity (Ho) | Expected Heterozygosity (He) | Polymorphic Information Content (PIC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gSSR6 | 9 | 3.85 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.69 |
| gSSR15 | 12 | 5.56 | 0.93 | 0.82 | 0.80 |
| gSSR19 | 6 | 2.78 | 0.97 | 0.64 | 0.58 |
| gSSR22 | 7 | 3.23 | 0.91 | 0.69 | 0.64 |
| gSSR34 | 17 | 5.88 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.82 |
| gSSR35 | 3 | 1.69 | 0.17 | 0.41 | 0.37 |
| gSSR38 | 4 | 2.22 | 0.76 | 0.55 | 0.47 |
| gSSR39 | 8 | 4.17 | 0.55 | 0.76 | 0.73 |
| gSSR40 | 6 | 4.00 | 0.91 | 0.75 | 0.71 |
| gSSR48 | 6 | 3.70 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.68 |
| gSSR50 | 4 | 1.75 | 0.61 | 0.43 | 0.34 |
| gSSR64 | 6 | 2.78 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 0.59 |
| gSSR72 | 11 | 3.85 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.70 |
| gSSR76 | 11 | 4.55 | 0.64 | 0.78 | 0.75 |
| gSSR85 | 12 | 3.57 | 0.55 | 0.72 | 0.68 |
| gSSR87 | 5 | 2.86 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.58 |
| gSSR103 | 13 | 5.88 | 0.54 | 0.83 | 0.81 |
| gSSR105 | 4 | 3.03 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.61 |
| gSSR106 | 6 | 3.23 | 0.97 | 0.69 | 0.63 |
| gSSR109 | 12 | 7.14 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.85 |
| gSSR113 | 8 | 3.57 | 0.57 | 0.72 | 0.67 |
| gSSR118 | 4 | 2.08 | 0.40 | 0.52 | 0.40 |
| gSSR131 | 6 | 4.35 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.74 |
| gSSR145 | 4 | 2.17 | 0.72 | 0.54 | 0.48 |
| gSSR157 | 5 | 4.55 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.74 |
| gSSR169 | 5 | 2.50 | 0.16 | 0.60 | 0.52 |
| gSSR184 | 9 | 2.94 | 0.36 | 0.66 | 0.60 |
| Total | 203.00 | 97.88 | 18.59 | 18.52 | 17.18 |
| Mean | 7.52 | 3.63 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.64 |
| Quantitative Trait | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Standard Deviation (SD) | Skewness | Kurtosis | Coefficient of Variation (CV) (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant height (cm) | 37 | 80 | 56.86 | 8.19 | −0.03 | −0.19 | 14.41 |
| Flowering-branch height (cm) | 23 | 56 | 38.52 | 6.09 | −0.11 | −0.03 | 15.81 |
| Terminal leaf length (cm) | 8.5 | 25 | 19.30 | 2.53 | −0.46 | 0.88 | 13.09 |
| Terminal leaf width (cm) | 2.5 | 11 | 6.72 | 1.62 | 0.23 | −0.35 | 24.09 |
| Inflorescence length (cm) | 6 | 20 | 11.60 | 2.57 | 0.47 | 0.30 | 22.13 |
| Inflorescence width (cm) | 4 | 17 | 9.81 | 1.97 | 0.41 | 0.85 | 20.08 |
| Secondary-inflorescence pedicel length (cm) | 2 | 7.5 | 3.92 | 0.92 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 23.37 |
| Number of ornamental bracts | 4 | 21 | 11.88 | 3.26 | 0.34 | −0.24 | 27.43 |
| Basal inflorescence-bract length (cm) | 2 | 5.5 | 3.50 | 0.73 | 0.25 | −0.26 | 20.84 |
| Basal inflorescence-bract width (cm) | 1.5 | 4.5 | 2.86 | 0.55 | 0.41 | 0.21 | 19.36 |
| Qualitative Trait | Trait Description | Number of Individuals | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Presence or absence of leaf back hairiness | With hairs | 93 | 53.76 |
| Without hairs | 80 | 46.24 |
| Trait | gSSR Marker | F Value | p Value | Q Value | Explained Variance (R2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant height (cm) | gSSR34 | 4.758 | 0.0032 | 0.065 | 7.79% |
| Terminal leaf length (cm) | gSSR105 | 7.171 | 0.0010 | 0.034 * | 7.78% |
| gSSR184 | 4.642 | 0.0038 | 0.060 | 7.61% | |
| gSSR64 | 4.995 | 0.0078 | 0.097 | 5.55% | |
| Terminal leaf width (cm) | gSSR184 | 7.165 | 1.48 × 10−4 | 0.009 * | 11.28% |
| gSSR105 | 7.712 | 6.22 × 10−4 | 0.031 * | 8.32% | |
| gSSR48 | 5.510 | 0.0012 | 0.037 * | 8.91% | |
| gSSR39 | 4.938 | 0.0025 | 0.059 | 8.06% | |
| Presence or absence of leaf back hairiness | gSSR169 | 6.184 | 0.0025 | 0.063 | 6.78% |
| gSSR106 | 4.704 | 0.0035 | 0.065 | 7.71% | |
| gSSR105 | 4.767 | 0.0096 | 0.115 | 5.31% | |
| Flowering-branch height (cm) | gSSR109 | 4.845 | 0.0029 | 0.062 | 7.92% |
| gSSR15 | 4.344 | 0.0056 | 0.079 | 7.16% | |
| gSSR34 | 4.287 | 0.0060 | 0.078 | 7.07% | |
| Inflorescence length (cm) | gSSR109 | 4.292 | 0.0060 | 0.081 | 7.08% |
| Secondary-inflorescence pedicel length (cm) | gSSR109 | 9.293 | 1.01 × 10−5 | 0.001 * | 14.16% |
| gSSR184 | 4.646 | 0.0037 | 0.063 | 7.62% | |
| gSSR105 | 5.629 | 0.0042 | 0.064 | 6.21% | |
| Basal inflorescence-bract length (cm) | gSSR48 | 5.947 | 7.04 × 10−4 | 0.026 * | 9.55% |
| gSSR38 | 5.175 | 0.0019 | 0.052 | 8.41% | |
| gSSR39 | 4.667 | 0.0036 | 0.064 | 7.65% | |
| Basal inflorescence-bract width (cm) | gSSR48 | 11.428 | 7.33 × 10−7 | 0.00022 * | 16.86% |
| gSSR184 | 10.806 | 1.56 × 10−6 | 0.00023 * | 16.09% | |
| gSSR105 | 11.071 | 3.02 × 10−5 | 0.002 * | 11.52% | |
| gSSR113 | 6.008 | 6.50 × 10−4 | 0.028 * | 9.64% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Chen, J.; Chen, P.; Tan, J.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, L.; Zheng, T.; Ye, Y. Evaluation of Ornamental Traits and Their Associations with Genomic Simple Sequence Repeat Markers in Globba sherwoodiana. Horticulturae 2026, 12, 1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12091135
Chen J, Chen P, Tan J, Zhou Y, Huang L, Zheng T, Ye Y. Evaluation of Ornamental Traits and Their Associations with Genomic Simple Sequence Repeat Markers in Globba sherwoodiana. Horticulturae. 2026; 12(9):1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12091135
Chicago/Turabian StyleChen, Jiayang, Peixun Chen, Jianjun Tan, Yiwei Zhou, Lishan Huang, Tangchun Zheng, and Yuanjun Ye. 2026. "Evaluation of Ornamental Traits and Their Associations with Genomic Simple Sequence Repeat Markers in Globba sherwoodiana" Horticulturae 12, no. 9: 1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12091135
APA StyleChen, J., Chen, P., Tan, J., Zhou, Y., Huang, L., Zheng, T., & Ye, Y. (2026). Evaluation of Ornamental Traits and Their Associations with Genomic Simple Sequence Repeat Markers in Globba sherwoodiana. Horticulturae, 12(9), 1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12091135

