Next Article in Journal
Comparative Biological Activities of Cotyledon and True Leaf Stages in Diverse Native Plant Seedlings
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Preharvest and Postharvest Salicylic Acid and Oxalic Acid Treatment on the Long Cold Storage Quality of ‘Lane Late’ Navel Oranges and ‘Summerina’ Mandarins
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

New Vegetable Products: From Native Genetic Resources to Innovative Developments in High-Consumption Species

by
Juan A. Fernández
1,2,*,
Catalina Egea-Gilabert
1,2,
Angelo Signore
3,
Annalisa Somma
3,
Massimiliano Renna
3 and
Nazim S. Gruda
4
1
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30203 Cartagena, Spain
2
Instituto de Biotecnología Vegetal (IBV), Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30202 Cartagena, Spain
3
Department of Soil, Plants and Food Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy
4
Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, Department of Horticultural Sciences, University of Bonn, 53121 Bonn, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2026, 12(7), 871; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12070871 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 20 June 2026 / Revised: 16 July 2026 / Accepted: 16 July 2026 / Published: 17 July 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Vegetable Production Systems)

Highlights

What are the main findings?
  • Crop diversification enhances sustainability and competitiveness.
  • Halophytes offer climate-resilient diversification potential.
  • Consumer acceptance depends on taste, familiarity, and branding.
What are the implications of the main findings?
  • Integrating biodiversity, nutrition, and market strategies drives future innovation.

Abstract

Selecting appropriate plant material is essential for successful vegetable production, as it directly affects product quality, market value, and consumer satisfaction. While major vegetable species already have stable markets, there is growing demand for innovative, healthy, and sustainable products, driving continuous development in the sector. This study provides an overview of novel vegetable products, ranging from native resources to recent innovations in widely consumed crops. Special emphasis is placed on neglected species, particularly edible halophytes, which offer high nutritional value and strong potential under climate change conditions. The study also examines unconventional plants not traditionally used as vegetables, which can contribute to diversifying diets and supporting local economies. At the same time, the vegetable industry continues to innovate by developing new products from common species, taking advantage of their variability in size, shape, color, and taste, including the rising trend of miniaturized vegetables. In addition, the concepts of “superfoods” and functional foods are critically analyzed to clarify their respective significance and distinguishing characteristics. The role of branding is also highlighted due to its increasing influence on consumer preferences. Overall, the study integrates contributions from farmers, industry, and researchers to expand vegetable diversity, promote innovation, and enhance product quality and consumer satisfaction.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The selection of appropriate plant material is determinant for the successful commercialization of vegetables, as it directly influences final product quality, market competitiveness, and consumer acceptance. The main vegetable species exhibit secure and consistent market demand because consumers are familiar with them, feel comfortable using them, and know how to prepare them for consumption.
Accepting unfamiliar vegetable species requires targeted marketing interventions to mitigate consumers’ neophobia, while willingness to adopt such products remains strongly influenced by sensory attributes, perceived health benefits, and, to some degree, environmental considerations. By contrast, changing dietary patterns and increased health awareness have stimulated interest in differentiated vegetable products with added nutritional and functional value, particularly among consumers who actively seek healthy and sustainable options. In response, the vegetable industry continues to develop innovative products that address evolving market demands, cultivation challenges, and environmental concerns.
The introduction of new vegetable crops presents substantial challenges, as they must not only be well adapted to local environmental conditions but also demonstrate competitive economic performance relative to existing crops [1]. As a result, market demand for these new vegetables remains limited, and the most notable diversification trends are associated with the development of new typologies in well-established species, with specialty and miniature crops as viable alternatives.
However, there is still growing interest in restoring food traditions and diversifying products, highlighting the potential of unfamiliar and wild species. They are, for instance, traditionally used in Mediterranean cuisine as new products [2]. Particularly, neglected crops are plant species that were formerly cultivated but later marginalized and are now being reintroduced into agricultural systems. They are gaining renewed attention for their agronomic resilience, nutritional value, and potential to contribute to sustainable, diversified food systems. In addition, there is a growing demand in some countries for unconventional plants valued for their unique culinary properties, even if they are not traditionally consumed as vegetables (partially or entirely). Finally, edible halophytes have recently emerged as relevant crops within the food industry, as they not only offer significant nutritional value but also represent a promising alternative crop in the context of climate change, with their high productivity under harsh conditions, such as elevated salinity and limited water availability [3,4]. Consequently, in the current context of climate change, soil degradation, and dietary homogenization at the global scale, these underutilized species represent strategic resources for broadening production systems and enhancing nutritional security. To fully exploit their potential, their genetic material must be effectively selected and improved using both conventional breeding and biotechnological approaches, facilitating their incorporation into breeding programs and climate-smart agricultural strategies [5,6].
In recent years, the retail sector has shown growing commercial interest in products marketed as functional food or “superfoods,” particularly in the retail sector. Although the term “superfoods” lacks an official scientific or regulatory definition, it is commonly used in marketing to describe foods rich in phytochemicals, valued for their potential health benefits, and often associated with local genetic resources or newly selected species. Also, branding is having a significant influence on the food retail sector and consumer trends, driving the adoption of market-oriented strategies that actively involve both farmers and vegetable breeding companies in promoting new products.
Although several recent reviews have examined individual topics such as neglected crops, edible halophytes, functional foods, or consumer preferences, these aspects are generally addressed independently. Consequently, an integrated perspective linking plant genetic resources, horticultural innovation, nutritional quality, consumer acceptance, and commercialization strategies is still lacking. The present review aims to bridge these interconnected themes to provide a full-chain integrated review of innovative vegetable products and future opportunities for the horticultural sector.
This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of recent developments concerning innovative vegetable products, ranging from native genetic resources to novel products derived from widely cultivated vegetable species.

2. Materials and Methods

The literature was identified through searches performed in the scientific databases Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed and Google Scholar. The search primarily focused on publications published between 2000 and 2025, while earlier highly cited papers were included when considered fundamental for understanding specific concepts or historical developments. The literature search combined keywords related to the main topics addressed in the review, including native vegetables, underutilized crops, neglected crops, halophytes, unconventional vegetables, specialty vegetables, functional foods, superfoods, microgreens, consumer acceptance, and branding, using different combinations depending on the specific section. Priority was given to peer-reviewed articles published in international scientific journals. Additional authoritative sources, including books, review articles, and publications from international organizations, were considered where appropriate to provide conceptual background or policy context. References were selected according to their scientific relevance, methodological quality, originality, and contribution to the topics discussed. The final reference list was assembled to provide a balanced and updated overview of the current state of knowledge by prioritizing conceptual relevance and knowledge transferability over exhaustiveness. This review aims to provide researchers and stakeholders with a critically synthesized state of the art on the topic and a foundation for future investigation and real-world applications.

3. Native Vegetable Resources

Native vegetable resources comprise plant species cultivated predominantly within their centres of origin by local farmers, as well as wild species, semi-domesticated forms, and landraces. These edible species are generally little known and remain largely confined to specific geographic regions. In the scientific literature, they are referred to as minor, underrepresented, underutilized, neglected, orphan, abandoned crops, traditional or rare vegetables, and wild edible species [7,8]. This broad group may also include unconventional vegetables derived from uncommon edible species, non-conventional plant parts, and agricultural by-products or waste streams [9]. Together, these resources represent an important component of agrobiodiversity with considerable agricultural, economic, and socio-cultural significance.
The decline and underutilization of native vegetable resources result from multiple interconnected factors. Limited commercial interest and insufficient policy support have contributed to the erosion of germplasm conservation systems and have restricted investment in breeding programs, seed systems, and dedicated research activities. In some cases, local species and landraces have also been displaced because of susceptibility to biotic stresses or lower yield performance compared with modern cultivars [10]. Cultural and socio-economic factors have further reinforced this process, as many traditional crops and wild edible species have historically been associated with subsistence farming, rural poverty, and marginal production systems. Consequently, their use has declined alongside the erosion of local knowledge, indigenous traditions, and cultural heritage [8]. Moreover, limited knowledge regarding their agronomic performance, nutritional properties, and technological applications remains a major constraint to their wider adoption and valorization.
Despite being historically overlooked, native vegetable germplasm has attracted increasing scientific interest due to its recognized agronomic, nutritional, and commercial potential [11]. Effective conservation and valorization require coordinated actions involving research institutions, policymakers, private stakeholders, and farming communities. The recovery of plant material and associated traditional knowledge represents a fundamental first step. In situ, ex situ, and on-farm conservation strategies are essential for preserving, studying, sanitizing, and multiplying genetic resources. Comprehensive botanical, agronomic, genetic, biochemical, and technological characterization is necessary to support both institutional protection and commercial recognition by registering autochthonous genetic resources and integrating them into value chains. Furthermore, the systematic collection and dissemination of information through public databases can facilitate knowledge transfer among academia, industry, and society [9]. Continued research should also promote innovative cultivation practices, novel processing technologies, and new culinary applications.
The long-term adaptation of native vegetable resources to specific environments, combined with their high intraspecific diversity, makes them valuable assets for sustainable agriculture. These resources can enhance agroecosystem resilience, support ecosystem services, and improve tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses, particularly in marginal environments and low-input or agroecological production systems [12,13,14,15]. Halophytes provide a notable example, as they are cultivated or harvested for their culinary and nutritional value while exhibiting remarkable tolerance to saline conditions [16]. Wild edible species and marginal crops may also serve as candidates for domestication, as demonstrated by wild rocket (Diplotaxis tenuifolia), and represent valuable sources of genetic variation for crop improvement [17,18,19]. In some cases, underutilized crops may outperform commercial cultivars under specific environmental conditions or within innovative production systems, as reported for vegetable melon compared with cucumber [20]. Consequently, these resources constitute an important reservoir of traits for plant breeding and varietal development [21].
Beyond their agronomic importance, native vegetable resources possess substantial biochemical diversity, including compounds associated with nutritional quality, sensory attributes, and nutraceutical properties. Increasing attention is being directed toward their aromatic, medicinal, and health-promoting characteristics, as well as their distinctive organoleptic and visual features. Several species are currently being investigated as ingredients for functional foods and health-oriented products [22,23]. Their diversity in colour, flavour, and appearance also creates opportunities for niche markets and innovative products such as microgreens [24].
These resources further contribute to social and cultural sustainability. Educational and recreational initiatives centred on local crops can strengthen connections between consumers and agricultural systems, support the preservation of traditional knowledge, and reinforce local identity and cultural heritage [25,26].
Renewed scientific, agronomic, and socio-economic attention to native and underutilized vegetable resources is strategically important for the development of sustainable and resilient food systems. Integrating germplasm conservation, genomic and phenotypic characterization, participatory breeding, agroecological evaluation, and value-chain development will be essential to unlock their full potential and enhance their contribution to future agriculture.

3.1. Neglected and Underutilized Crops

Neglected and underutilized crops (NUCs) are non-commodity crops that have historically supported local food systems but are currently receiving limited attention from global food markets, scientific research, conservation, and modern agriculture, despite their valuable agronomic, health, and nutritional potential. They are adapted to limited areas and local cultural and agronomic contexts and are cultivated predominantly within their centres of origin and maintained by smallholder farmers or indigenous communities [8,27].
At the local level, NUCs play a paramount role in supporting ecological sustainability and dietary diversity in traditional, marginal, and indigenous agroecosystems [28]. Also, in favourable and rich areas, they are crucial for sustainable agriculture, agroecological or low-input practices, and social agriculture [29]. These resources provide income opportunities for smallholder farmers to niche markets for traditional and organic products, often generating higher profit margins than conventional staples [30]. Socio-economic and institutional factors are the primary causes of crop marginalization: weak or absent formal seed supply systems; limited commercial integration owing to their failure to meet modern quality standards for uniformity; and under-representation in research and global agricultural scenarios [8,31]. Although still underrepresented in research and commercial agriculture, these crops frequently display strong adaptation to low-input environments, along with valuable nutritional traits and adaptability to low-input or stress-prone conditions [11,15,30,32]. Cultivation of NUCs directly contributes to biodiversity conservation in both agricultural systems and natural ecosystems by promoting the use of a wider range of plant species, thereby counteracting genetic erosion and supporting ecosystem services [27].
In recent decades, neglected crops have been emphasized as an opportunity [33] and are increasingly regarded by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) [34] as strategic resources for dietary diversification and nutritional security, thereby improving human health and diversifying diets. They exhibit superior or complementary nutrient profiles compared with widely cultivated species, being rich in high-quality proteins, dietary fibre, essential amino acids, and vitamins such as provitamin A, vitamin E, and B-complex vitamins, together with significant concentrations of essential minerals including iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg) [27,35,36].
Recent studies have highlighted that increased consumption of underexploited plant species may help alleviate micronutrient deficiencies, commonly referred to as “hidden hunger”, particularly in regions where access to diversified diets remains limited [5,8,37]. Their integration into local food systems, therefore, represents a valuable strategy for improving nutritional security while preserving agrobiodiversity. Furthermore, unconventional edible plants are increasingly recognized for their richness in phytochemicals, including polyphenols, flavonoids, carotenoids, and omega-3 fatty acids, compounds associated with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and cardioprotective effects, thereby positioning many of these species as promising candidates for functional foods and nutraceutical applications [27]. As sources of high levels of nutrients and bioactive compounds, these foods have a phytochemical composition associated with several health-promoting properties [8]. For example, vegetable melons (Cucumis melo L.) landraces from Southern Italy offer the uncommon polyphenol methyl gallate, a strong health-promoting antioxidant [38]; tamarillo (Solanum betaceum (Cav.) Sendt.) is valued for the good productivity, adaptability, and the wide range of bioactive molecules of the edible fruit, such as Vitamins A, C, E, potassium (K), and antioxidants [39]; taro (Colocasia esculenta L.), a zero wastage crop provides starch, dietary fibres, sugars, vitamin A, essential minerals (Ca, Fe, Zn, Mg); species of Cactaceae family with potential for human and animal nutrition, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries [40]. Despite their nutritional advantages, many NUCs may contain antinutritional compounds; therefore, controlling nitrate and oxalate levels is essential to ensure food quality and compliance with safety standards [2]. Since the accumulation of these compounds varies among species and is influenced by environmental and agronomic factors, their assessment should be included in the selection and domestication of promising wild vegetables.
Across the reported cases, neglected and underutilized crops share several recurring strengths, including adaptation to local environments, tolerance to low-input or stress-prone conditions, high nutritional and phytochemical diversity, and potential value for niche markets and smallholder livelihoods. However, these advantages are not universal and should not be generalized across species. Agronomic performance, yield stability, antinutritional compound content, consumer acceptance, and commercial quality vary considerably among crops and production environments. For instance, vegetable melon illustrates the potential of locally adapted germplasm to outperform conventional crops under specific environmental conditions, whereas species such as taro, tamarillo, and members of the Cactaceae mainly exemplify nutritional, multifunctional, or zero-waste value rather than direct agronomic superiority. Therefore, the contribution of NUCs to sustainable food systems depends on matching species-specific characteristics with appropriate production systems, dietary needs, and market opportunities. This also highlights the need for comparative agronomic evaluation, food safety assessment, consumer-oriented research, and value-chain development alongside germplasm conservation and characterization.
To sum up, these crops constitute relevant food-systems genetic resources for building resilient and diversified agricultural systems while contributing to dietary diversification and future-oriented agricultural innovation (Figure 1). Nevertheless, their wider adoption remains constrained by the limited availability of improved cultivars and certified seed, insufficient agronomic knowledge, fragmented value chains, low consumer awareness, and inadequate policy support. Addressing these challenges will require coordinated efforts integrating breeding programmes, seed-system development, agronomic optimization, market development, extension services, and consumer education. Overall, neglected and underutilized crops should be regarded as heterogeneous resources rather than as a uniform crop category. Their successful reintroduction will depend on species-specific evidence, targeted breeding and agronomic development, reliable seed systems, consumer acceptance, and supportive market and policy frameworks.

3.2. Unconventional Vegetables

The term “unconventional vegetables” denotes edible plant species or plant parts that are not commonly used in mainstream diets or formal agricultural supply chains. These may include underutilized species, wild edible plants, or portions of cultivated crops generally regarded as by-products or agricultural waste [9]. Recent studies highlight their potential contribution to dietary diversification and the recovery of overlooked edible resources [41]. Within agricultural sciences, these species are increasingly recognized for their potential contribution to agrobiodiversity conservation, sustainable food systems, and dietary diversification.
In Mediterranean countries, several unconventional vegetables are traditionally consumed locally. For instance, the lateral shoots of globe artichoke (Cynara cardunculus L. subsp. scolymus), commonly referred to as “cardoni” or “carducci” (Figure 2A), develop during the vegetative phase and are removed as part of standard agronomic management practices. Rather than being discarded, these shoots are consumed like cultivated cardoon (C. cardunculus L. var. altilis DC). In the case of summer squash, the tender stems, petioles, flowers, and young leaves are traditionally harvested and prepared as leafy greens (known as “cime di zucchini”—Figure 2B), comparable to other commonly consumed leafy vegetables such as chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) and Swiss chard (Beta vulgaris L.). Similarly, the apical portion of the faba bean plant—approximately 5–10 cm in length and collected during green pruning—is utilized as a leafy vegetable (referred to as “cime di fava”—Figure 2C), in much the same way as spinach leaves. Crenate broomrape (Orobanche crenata Forssk. Figure 2D), a root-parasitic species that severely affects numerous crops, particularly legumes, is also gathered and prepared in a fashion analogous to asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.), forming the basis of several traditional culinary preparations [9]. Moreover, faba bean (Vicia faba L. var. major Harz) hulls are a by-product of bean processing and are typically discarded as waste. However, they are incorporated into certain traditional Italian dishes [42].
Beyond the Mediterranean basin, other regions offer relevant examples of wild or semi-cultivated unconventional vegetables. In southern Africa, some indigenous species (i.e., Amaranthus dubius Mart. ex Thell. and Cleome gynandra L.) are consumed as leafy vegetables [10]. Similarly, Asia hosts a remarkable diversity of traditional vegetable species, many of which remain underutilized outside their regions of origin. Beyond the already established Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis) and pak choi (B. rapa subsp. chinensis), species such as mizuna (B. rapa var. nipposinica), shiso (Perilla frutescens var. crispa), and water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) represent promising crops for diversification owing to their nutritional value, unique sensory characteristics, and potential for functional food markets [43]. Several unconventional vegetables (e.g., Ampelygonum chinense (L.) Lindl., Solanum indicum L., Vigna grahamiana (Wight & Arn.) Verdc., Sarcochlamys pulcherrima) that grow wild in specific regions of Bangladesh are consumed only by local people [44]. In Brazil, unconventional vegetables are considered those with limited distribution (i.e., Basella alba L., Amaranthus viridis L., Eryngium campestre L., Lactuca canadensis L., Stachys byzantine K. Koch, etc.), usually circumscribed to certain localities and/or regions, which were once widely consumed and produced by some populations and still compose typical regional dishes, important in the cultural expression of these populations [45].
Several characterization studies have revealed favourable nutritional and functional properties of many unconventional vegetables. For example, because of their fibre content, offshoots of globe artichokes can be considered a useful food for the bowel. Summer squash greens could be recommended as a vegetable, especially for hypoglycemic diets, given their carbohydrate composition. Due to their low nitrate content, faba greens could be recommended as a substitute for nitrate-rich leafy vegetables. Crenate broomrape exhibits high antioxidant activity and may be considered a very nutritious agri-food product [9]. Due to their low vicine content and high levels of polyphenols and levodihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA), fava bean hulls have been highlighted as a potential functional food for patients with Parkinson’s disease [42]. Characterization studies on native vegetables from different parts of the world have revealed high levels of antioxidant activity, suggesting their potential use in the development of functional foods [41,44,45]. Such characteristics reinforce their relevance in diversified, resource-efficient food systems.
Overall, the cases reviewed here reveal three principal pathways through which unconventional vegetables can be valorised: (i) the recovery of traditionally consumed wild or semi-cultivated species, (ii) the use of edible plant parts normally removed during crop management, and (iii) the conversion of processing by-products into food products. These pathways differ substantially in their technical and commercial requirements. Wild and regionally consumed species generally require domestication, propagation protocols, agronomic standardization, and greater consumer familiarity, whereas edible crop parts and processing by-products can often be integrated more readily into existing production systems but still require evidence regarding food safety, nutritional consistency, shelf life, and processing suitability. Across the reviewed cases, nutritional or functional value alone does not guarantee successful adoption. Sensory quality, culinary traditions, consumer acceptance, regulatory compliance, reliable supply chains, and economic viability are equally important determinants of their wider utilization. Accordingly, the most promising unconventional vegetables are likely to be those that combine demonstrated nutritional value with practical integration into existing production, processing, and distribution systems. Future research should therefore move beyond descriptive compositional studies towards comparative evaluations of agronomic feasibility, food safety, consumer acceptance, processing performance, and economic viability.

3.3. Halophytes

Halophytes are salt-tolerant plant species capable of completing their life cycle under high-salinity conditions that are unsuitable for glycophytes. Their ability to withstand saline environments relies on a range of adaptive strategies, including ion compartmentalization and/or exclusion/excretion, osmotic adjustment, tissue succulence, and enhanced antioxidant defences [46].
Numerous halophyte species growing in coastal and inland saline habitats are edible and have traditionally been appreciated for their distinctive organoleptic characteristics [16]. Many of these wild edible plants possess an adequate nutritional profile for human diets, providing valuable minerals and various bioactive compounds that are beneficial to health [47,48]. The growing incorporation of edible halophytes into specialty markets reflects not only their nutritional potential but also rising awareness of healthy and sustainable diets. Their demand in specialty markets is additionally driven by their naturally salty flavour, resulting from salt accumulation in the aerial parts of the plant, and by their succulent leaves, which confer a light, crisp, and appealing texture [49].
Recent studies demonstrate that several edible halophytes, such as glasswort (Salicornia spp.), garden orache (Atriplex hortensis L.), scurvy grass (Cochlearia officinalis L.), and palm kale (Brassica oleracea L. var. palmifoli), have been reported to contain relevant concentrations of proteins, polyunsaturated fatty acids, essential minerals, and antioxidant compounds [50]. In controlled saline agricultural systems, species such as Salicornia and Sarcocornia have shown notable concentrations of dietary fibre, Fe, Mg, and bioactive carotenoids. Moreover, Salicornia shoots have demonstrated good postharvest performance, maintaining high quality as ready-to-eat products, which further increases their commercial and horticultural value [51]. However, the accumulation of plant secondary metabolites varies according to both salinity gradients and species-specific responses. Salinity stress can modulate secondary metabolite biosynthesis and, in some cases, enhance phenolic content and antioxidant capacity [52].
Sea fennel (Crithmum maritimum L.) represents a Mediterranean halophyte with increasing horticultural potential. It is frequently used as a model species to study the effects of salinity on plant metabolism and nutritional quality. Under hydroponic saline conditions, this species maintains satisfactory edible quality despite increased sodium and chloride concentrations, remaining a nutritious vegetable crop [53]. Salinity may also stimulate stress-related metabolic pathways and promote the accumulation of secondary metabolites. Furthermore, treatments such as methyl jasmonate (MeJA) have been shown to alleviate salt stress while enhancing flavonoid and mineral content and preserving antioxidant capacity [54], highlighting promising agronomic strategies to improve the nutritional and functional quality of halophyte crops under controlled cultivation.
Despite their nutritional advantages, many unconventional and neglected crops contain antinutritional compounds that may reduce mineral uptake or affect sensory quality. These include antinutritional factors such as phytates and oxalates, as well as elevated concentrations of certain ions that may accumulate under specific environmental conditions. For example, purslane may accumulate substantial amounts of nitrates and oxalates depending on developmental stage and cultivation conditions. Thus, reported nitrate concentrations range from 1100 to 3400 mg kg−1 in baby leaves and 2500–2800 mg kg−1 in microgreens, while oxalate levels may reach 1500–2700 mg kg−1 in baby leaves and 4300–5300 mg kg−1 in microgreens [55,56]. In other stress-adapted halophytes such as Mesembryanthemum crystallinum, oxalate concentrations exceeding 9000 mg kg−1 have been reported [57]. However, certain strategies can reduce the antinutritional content of these products; for example, nitrate levels have been shown to decrease under higher salinity treatments [50]. Moreover, traditional processing methods—such as fermentation, soaking, or thermal treatment—can also reduce the concentration of these compounds and improve nutrient bioaccessibility. In parallel, modern analytical approaches, including metabolomics and in vitro digestion models, are increasingly used to characterize nutrient functionality and health-promoting properties.
The successful incorporation of wild halophyte species into vegetable supply chains requires structured and multidisciplinary approaches. This process demands comprehensive knowledge of propagation techniques—such as seed production and germination—as well as cultivation practices tailored to optimize plant performance under specific soil and climatic conditions [58].
Halophytes constitute a strategic option for the productive use of marginal areas. Their resilience to abiotic stresses, particularly salinity and drought, combined with their nutritional, phytoremediation, and phytochemical attributes, favours their inclusion in diversification-oriented production systems focused on crop diversification and land restoration. However, despite the promising characteristics of several species, further investigations are necessary to refine propagation protocols, particularly seed germination and dormancy-breaking strategies. In addition, innovations in seed priming techniques and the application of biostimulants may significantly enhance plant establishment and early development under stress conditions. Beyond propagation, defining species-specific cultivation protocols is crucial to facilitate the shift from wild harvesting to domesticated production. Overall, incorporating halophytes into cropping systems is a strategic approach to strengthening agricultural resilience, conserving biodiversity, and generating economic opportunities in marginal and coastal environments [46].
Although edible halophytes exhibit several desirable characteristics, their commercial adoption is still relatively low. Production is still based largely on small-scale cultivation or wild harvesting, while standardized cultivation protocols, postharvest handling procedures, consumer familiarity, and regulatory frameworks are still developing. Future research should therefore focus not only on agronomic optimization but also on market development and supply-chain organization.

4. Innovative Developments in High-Consumption Species

Nowadays, consumer adoption of entirely novel vegetables remains limited, with diversification trends primarily focused on developing new varieties within well-established species, as previously mentioned. Molecular advances, including SNP markers and next-generation sequencing, have become key drivers of innovation, revolutionizing breeding programs by enabling high-resolution trait mapping and the identification of candidate genes. These technologies have accelerated the development of nutritionally enhanced cultivars and laid the foundation for innovative breeding strategies in high-consumption vegetables, where improving nutritional quality while maintaining agronomic performance and consumer acceptance has become a major research priority. Complementing these approaches, modern biotechnological tools such as genetic engineering and genome editing enable the targeted modification of specific nutritional traits. Building on these advances, emerging breeding strategies integrate multi-omics technologies, plant microbiome research, and artificial intelligence (AI). The combination of diverse biological datasets with microbiome information and AI-based models enhances the understanding of complex traits, speeds up the selection of superior genotypes, and supports the development of climate-resilient, nutrient-rich cultivars. Notable examples include increasing vitamin content in tomatoes and reducing anti-nutritional compounds in spinach, highlighting the potential of these technologies to improve the nutritional profile of vegetables [6]. The impact of these advances is particularly evident in crop diversification within established vegetable species, where breeding efforts have focused on exploiting intraspecific genetic diversity to generate novel cultivars with improved nutritional, sensory, and agronomic attributes. This strategy has been especially successful in economically important crops such as tomato, lettuce, and melon [59]. Tomatoes, for example, are now available in an exceptional diversity of fruit sizes, shapes, colours, textures, and flavour profiles, illustrating how modern breeding has expanded consumer choice while increasing product value and market differentiation. Some of them are new cultivars resembling old heirloom varieties [10]. In this context, the case of the cultivar RAF (an acronym for Fusarium-Resistant) is particularly relevant in Spain. RAF is an open-pollinated variety derived from a Marmande tomato strain, which has been cultivated in Almería since the sixties. It was characterized by its intensely sweet–acidic, pleasant flavour and firm flesh. Due to its lower yields, attributable to the cultivation of a variety with limited breeding improvement under saline conditions, and high market demand, it was and remains considered a gourmet product. At the end of the 20th century, a hybrid known as ‘Delizia’ was developed from the original RAF variety, successfully preserving its defining quality traits. Subsequently, the hybrids ‘Ambrosia,’ ‘Poesía’ and ‘Conquista’ were introduced, incorporating enhanced resistance to viral diseases while preserving the distinctive flavour profile of the original RAF tomato. Owing to their shared sensory and quality attributes, these hybrids continue to be marketed under the traditional RAF designation, sometimes accompanied by quality labels such as “Pata Negra” or “Premium”, which are used to differentiate their commercial or enterprise origin. In addition, a distinctive variant known as ‘Miniraf’ was included in this group, characterized by its smaller fruit size, which results from production at the end of the growing cycle of the aforementioned hybrids. All of them are still considered gourmet products and can reach market prices of up to €25 per kilogram, particularly during peak periods such as the Christmas season. This has led several vegetable breeding companies to develop new RAF-like varieties, including blue or chocolate-brown RAF types, as well as more productive hybrids with resistance to current tomato viruses.
In parallel, the recent introduction of specialty crops has contributed to horticultural diversification. These crops are agronomically related to established species and, despite their limited adoption in large-scale production systems, exhibit high economic value and substantial cultural or nutritional importance. However, the concept of specialty crops presents several challenges, as there is no internationally accepted definition of the term. It may encompass vegetables considered new or unusual due to the way they are grown, as well as varieties distinguished by their colour, shape, flavour, size, or by their diverse origins and market demand [60]. An example of these specialty crops is Crunshella™, a snack lettuce with naturally spoon-shaped leaves and sufficient strength to support both hot and cold toppings, making it ideal for creating tapas-style spoons, wraps, and salads. Moreover, factors such as convenience, portability, reduced food waste, and suitability for smaller households with lower vegetable consumption have led to smaller sizes of commonly consumed vegetables [61]. Common examples include personal-sized watermelon and melon, compact lettuce types such as baby lettuce, mini cauliflower, and, recently, mini celery.
Miniaturisation represents another relevant diversification strategy, e.g., miniature vegetables consumed as snacks in one or two bites. The distribution of these snack vegetables through refrigerated “healthy vending” machines is already well established and is expected to expand further. As many snacking occasions occur in the workplace, office meetings represent a promising context for promoting vegetable consumption. In addition, their presentation as ready-to-eat mini vegetables is increasingly common in supermarkets, particularly in countries such as the Netherlands, where they are popular among adolescents and typically consumed without further preparation [62]. In addition, offering fruits and vegetables as snacks in childcare facilities increases children’s consumption and helps them meet recommendations [63]. Because dietary habits formed in childhood and adolescence often persist into adulthood, fostering them early supports long-term health. There is evidence that cherry tomatoes are the best-known snack vegetable due to their appealing taste, nutritional benefits, and versatility in culinary applications. In addition, snack peppers and cucumbers (sweeter versions of their larger counterparts) and baby carrots are now common healthy alternatives to sweet or savoury snacks. Snack sweet peppers are smaller-fruited varieties of sweet pepper with thin skins, crisp flesh and a naturally sweet flavour. While conventional sweet snack pepper cultivars are well established, seedless varieties are still emerging. However, several seedless commercial lines are now available, offered in a range of pericarp colours (e.g., red, yellow, and orange) and sizes, including one-bite and two-bite formats. Snack cucumbers have a refreshing crunch with a juicy, mild flavour and a sweeter finish than their larger counterparts. Because they are consumed unpeeled, they are rich in insoluble fibre and retain significantly higher levels of key micronutrients, particularly essential vitamins and minerals. Baby carrots are small in size, averaging 7–10 cm in length, harvested before reaching their maturity. Nowadays, certain carrot cultivars have been bred for use at the “baby” stage. They are crunchy and tender, with a sweeter flavour than full-grown, mature carrots. There is some confusion about what qualifies as a baby carrot, since there is another small carrot type, known as baby-cut carrots, that are cut and shaped from larger carrots. Carrots show substantial variation in their phytochemical profiles depending on their size and skin colour. Overall, the superior properties of miniature varieties, particularly mini purple carrots, offer a promising opportunity to develop novel, high-value food products with enhanced health benefits [64].
The other specialty vegetable segment, represented by sprouts, microgreens, and baby leaves, has become an important component of convenience-oriented vegetable products in the food industry because it imparts intense flavours, enticing aromas, and outstanding nutritional value to a variety of dishes. In addition, as consumers look for softer textures in prepared salad mixes, baby-sized leafy vegetables have been among the most promising ready-to-eat developments. The cultivation of microgreens and baby leaves has expanded rapidly in recent years, a trend largely attributed to growing public awareness of their nutritional advantages and increasing recognition of their commercial potential [65,66,67]. The key advantages of cultivating these vegetables lie in their relatively low production and maintenance costs [67,68].
The increasing market demand for microgreens and baby leaves has driven the expansion of their large-scale production in controlled-environment agriculture (CEA) systems, where indoor vertical farming techniques are predominantly used to optimize space, resource efficiency, and year-round yields. Within these systems, LED lighting technologies have become particularly important because they enable precise control of light spectra, intensity, and photoperiod, thereby influencing plant growth, yield, and phytochemical accumulation [69,70]. This approach is especially relevant for halophytic microgreens, which have gained increasing interest as nutrient-dense crops due to the possibility of simultaneously controlling environmental factors such as light quality, salinity, and nutrient management. For instance, specific LED lighting conditions have been shown to improve yield and quality in purslane microgreens cultivated under saline conditions while also reducing antinutritional compounds [56]. These findings highlight the importance of integrating advanced lighting technologies into microgreen production systems to optimize both nutritional quality and functional properties.
In this context, a new concept termed “farm on the fork” has recently been developed in the field of microgreens by Rodríguez-Sánchez-de-Molina et al. [71], enabling the efficient production of mustard microgreens within an edible substrate–packaging system using gellan gum as growing medium. In addition, special attention must be given to leguminous microgreens, which are a concentrated source of protein and exhibit a superior nutritional profile compared to mature plants, with higher levels of fibre, vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, and bioactive compounds [72]. Particularly, pea shoots are increasingly recognized as a valuable functional food ingredient. Traditionally popular in Asia and Africa, they are now gaining wider acceptance in North America and Europe. Rich in bioactive compounds such as flavonoids, carotenoids and ascorbic acid, pea shoots contribute to dietary antioxidant intake and provide potential health benefits [73]. Recent studies have also shown that LED lighting can enhance their nutritional quality and preserve phytonutrient composition during postharvest storage [74]. Finally, the “teen leaf” category should be considered. This product represents an emerging salad concept in which plants are harvested at a slightly more advanced developmental stage than traditional baby leaves. This results in firmer leaf tissue while maintaining acceptable organoleptic quality, thereby enhancing harvest efficiency and overall yield [75]. Within this product segment, the use of lettuce varieties such as the Salanova® type is highly recommended, as they are particularly well suited for fresh-cut processing. Some of these varieties contain Knox™, a natural trait that delays browning, thereby extending shelf life and reducing postharvest waste.
Despite the rapid market expansion of these innovative developments, several challenges remain, including relatively high production costs under controlled environments, short shelf life, food safety management, and the need for standardized quality protocols. Addressing these issues will facilitate wider commercialization and consumer acceptance.

5. Functional Foods vs. “Superfoods”

Functional foods are foods that deliver health-promoting effects beyond their basic nutritional value. Recently, the term “superfoods” has also become widely used in food marketing to describe nutrient-dense products associated with perceived health-promoting properties. Although the concept lacks a standardized scientific definition, it is commonly linked to foods rich in vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, and other bioactive compounds. The commercial success of these products has been strongly supported by marketing strategies emphasizing naturalness, exotic origin, and wellness-oriented lifestyles. Although many health claims associated with superfoods are broadly supported by scientific evidence, they frequently rely on in vitro or animal studies rather than robust human clinical trials. Consequently, the European Union prohibited the use of the term “superfood” on food packaging unless accompanied by an authorized health claim [76,77]. Despite these regulatory limitations, consumer interest in “superfoods” has continued to increase. Marketing strategies that emphasize exotic origins and pristine imagery have proven particularly effective, significantly boosting demand [77]. The global superfoods market is projected to grow from a minimum estimated size of 155.2 billion dollars in 2022 to a maximum of 344.9 billion dollars by 2033, with a compound annual growth rate ranging between 4.0% and 10.2% during the forecast period, depending on the information source [78]. This market expansion has also influenced global production systems. A relatively small group of countries dominates the global superfood market, largely due to favourable climates and deeply rooted agricultural traditions. Many of these products have long been cultivated and consumed by indigenous communities, who value them for their nutritional and therapeutic properties [79]. Their continued link to these cultures and traditional farming systems helps reinforce perceptions of authenticity, sustainability, and health benefits. However, they are sometimes produced far from where they are consumed, and their growing demand has led to socio-environmental impacts in producer countries, including the expansion of monocultures, the loss of traditional crops, and intensified agricultural practices [80,81].
These dynamics also raise ethical and social-responsibility questions that merit explicit acknowledgment. Framing traditional foods as generic “superfoods,” detached from their cultural and geographical origin, can amount to a form of cultural appropriation, as extensively documented for quinoa, whose global commercialization has been criticized for decoupling the product from the Andean communities that domesticated and selected it over centuries [26,82]. Moreover, unless mechanisms consistent with the access and benefit-sharing (ABS) principles of the Nagoya Protocol to the Convention on Biological Diversity are applied, the communities that conserved the genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge underlying these products may not proportionally share in the economic value generated by their commercialization. In parallel, consumers’ right to accurate information is also at stake: marketing narratives relying on exoticism and unsubstantiated health claims can be misleading, a concern partly addressed at the regulatory level by the EU restriction on the term “superfood” [76,77], but still calling for more transparent traceability and labelling practices.
Within the vegetable sector, the superfood concept includes both traditional crops, particularly landraces and locally adapted genotypes recognized for their unique phytochemical profiles, and innovative vegetable products. Accordingly, emerging crops, such as water lentils, microgreens, and seaweeds, have increasingly been marketed as “superfoods” because of their high nutrient density and abundance of bioactive compounds. Moreover, the lack of standardized cultivation and quality control protocols underscores the need for industry-wide guidelines to ensure consistent sensory, nutritional, and postharvest quality.
Cruciferous vegetables such as kale, broccoli, Bimi®, collard greens, rocket salad, etc., as well as leafy greens like spinach and Swiss chard, are among the most common vegetable “superfoods”. Numerous epidemiological studies have shown that higher intakes of cruciferous vegetables are associated with a reduced risk of cardiometabolic diseases, musculoskeletal disorders, and cancer [83], generally associated with their glucosinolate content and their hydrolysis products (isothiocyanates, notably sulforaphane) [84]. The concentration of these compounds is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors, including nutrient availability, light quality, and abiotic stress conditions [85]. Thus, targeted manipulation of the N:S ratio in nutrient solution can modulate glucosinolate content in soilless Brassicaceae [86].
Besides conventional cruciferous vegetables, several emerging horticultural products have gained considerable scientific and commercial interest. Among them, microgreens have emerged as a prominent category of nutrient-dense functional foods. High concentrations of bioactive compounds, including polyphenols, carotenoids, vitamins, and glucosinolates, characterize these young seedlings. In many cases, their nutritional value exceeds that of mature plants [87,88,89]. Red cabbage microgreens, for instance, contain up to 6-fold higher vitamin C and 69-fold higher vitamin K than mature red cabbage [87]. Additionally, compared to their counterparts, vegetables often used cooked, the consumption of raw microgreens has the advantage of avoiding nutrient loss or the degradation of thermolabile vitamins. However, microgreens can accumulate relatively high levels of nitrates in their leaves, with their concentration depending largely on the plant species and growing conditions [88]. Finally, their short production cycle and suitability for soilless and indoor systems make them particularly attractive for sustainable and urban agriculture.
There is also growing interest in underutilized and traditional vegetable species, which could become “superfoods” due to their high nutritional value and adaptability to marginal environments. These crops may contribute to dietary diversification and food security, particularly in regions facing climatic and economic constraints [90]. Examples include purslane (Portulaca oleracea), rich in omega-3 fatty acids; moringa (Moringa oleifera), rich in proteins and vitamins; and Mediterranean wild edible greens such as Cichorium intybus, C. spinosum (stamnagathi), Silene vulgaris and Diplotaxis tenuifolia (wild rocket). Nevertheless, as previously mentioned, some leafy wild vegetables may contain antinutritional compounds [55,56]; therefore, monitoring nitrate and oxalate levels is essential to ensure food quality and compliance with safety standards.
Recent research has focused on enhancing functional properties through agronomic practices. The manipulation of environmental factors, such as light spectrum (using LEDs), nutrient solution composition, and the controlled application of abiotic stresses (e.g., salinity, UV radiation), has been shown to stimulate secondary metabolite synthesis [4,91,92,93,94]. This approach allows the production of vegetables with tailored nutritional profiles. This strategy, termed “eustress” management, exploits mild, controlled stress to trigger defence mechanisms, thereby enhancing bioactive compounds without significant yield penalties [86]. In addition, biotechnological approaches, including biofortification and the use of beneficial microorganisms, are also being explored to enhance the nutritional quality of vegetable crops further the nutritional quality of vegetable crops [95,96]. These strategies are aligned with the concept of “functional horticulture,” which integrates crop production with human health objectives. Selenium and iodine biofortification via nutrient solution in soilless systems has shown promising results in addressing micronutrient deficiencies [97,98].
Overall, while the term “superfood” remains scientifically imprecise, the underlying research on enhancing bioactive compounds in vegetables constitutes a highly dynamic interdisciplinary field. In addition, while vegetable-based foods commonly labelled as superfoods can contribute to nutrient intake, their purported exceptional properties cannot substitute for an overall balanced dietary pattern and healthy lifestyle. Moreover, ensuring the accessibility and affordability of nutrient-dense vegetables remains a key challenge. Future developments will likely focus on combining genetic improvement, controlled environment cultivation, and targeted agronomic strategies to enhance the functional quality of vegetables. Priority areas include: (i) cultivar-specific light recipes optimizing yield and nutritional quality; (ii) multi-omics approaches to understand genotype-by-environment interactions; and (iii) standardized protocols for evaluating phytochemical bioaccessibility and bioavailability.

6. Product Attributes and Consumer Acceptance

Product quality in horticultural supply chains is a multidimensional and stakeholder-dependent concept, with breeders, producers, retailers, and consumers prioritizing different attribute sets [92,93,94,99]. While international marketing standards (e.g., FAO, UNECE, and OECD) predominantly focus on external appearance traits such as size, shape, colour, and absence of defects, comprehensive quality assessment increasingly incorporates sensory performance, nutritional value, health-related properties, and alignment with evolving consumer lifestyles [92,93,94,99]. The key determinants of consumer acceptance are summarized in Table 1.
Consumer acceptance of vegetable products is primarily driven by the interaction between intrinsic attributes (e.g., flavour, texture, aroma, and freshness) and extrinsic cues (e.g., origin, price, branding, and sustainability claims) [94]. Among intrinsic factors, sensory perception remains the strongest determinant of repeat purchase and long-term consumption [100]. In particular, the balance of bitterness and sweetness, mouthfeel, and aroma intensity significantly influence hedonic evaluation and willingness to purchase. Accordingly, the sensory properties of vegetables are closely linked to consumer acceptance, with preparation methods, product familiarity, and individual sensory preferences further shaping acceptance and consumption patterns [100].
Improving sensory quality therefore represents a major opportunity for product innovation. Evidence shows that relatively small modifications in product preparation can substantially increase consumer acceptance. For example, Feng et al. [101] demonstrated that seasoning substantially increases consumer liking of vegetables, highlighting the importance of palatability-oriented innovation in promoting vegetable consumption. Thus, sensory optimisation represents not only a culinary improvement but also a key strategy in product development and public health-oriented food innovation.
Beyond sensory quality, nutritional and health-related attributes are increasingly recognized as important drivers of perceived product value. Consumers generally show greater appreciation for vegetables with enhanced nutritional profiles, elevated levels of bioactive compounds, or demonstrated health benefits. However, these attributes rarely compensate for poor sensory quality. This interaction between sensory and non-sensory attributes is supported by the systematic review of Laureati et al. [102], which concluded that consumer acceptance of novel foods is shaped by the combined effects of perceived health benefits, sustainability considerations, sensory expectations, and individual consumer characteristics.
Although sensory quality is essential, consumers cannot always evaluate intrinsic characteristics before purchase. Consequently, they rely on extrinsic cues to form quality expectations. Thus, provenance and labelling strongly influence purchasing behaviour, as demonstrated by Gruda et al. [94], where locally labelled produce was preferred even under minimal production differences. Similarly, branding and geographical indications contribute to perceived quality and market value, particularly within protected EU frameworks [93,94].
Economic accessibility represents an additional determinant of consumer acceptance, particularly for innovative vegetable products entering competitive markets. Although consumers increasingly value nutritional quality, sustainability, and health-promoting attributes, purchasing decisions remain strongly influenced by price, affordability, and perceived value for money. A recent systematic review demonstrated that consumers are generally willing to pay premium prices for healthier food products when the added value is clearly communicated; however, affordability remains a major constraint for widespread adoption [103]. Similar findings were reported for vegetables in China, where consumers were willing to pay premium prices for safe vegetables, while excessive prices and price fluctuations negatively affected purchasing intentions [104]. These findings indicate that successful commercialization of innovative vegetable products requires balancing product quality and added value with acceptable price levels to ensure broad consumer adoption.
Consumer responses are further shaped by heterogeneity in preferences. Using a Best–Worst Scaling approach, Massaglia et al. [105] showed that while freshness and sensory quality are generally prioritised, certain consumer segments place greater emphasis on credence attributes such as sustainability and local origin. These findings are consistent with more recent evidence showing that demographic characteristics, lifestyle, personal values, and sustainability orientations further influence consumer preferences and acceptance patterns [106]. Together, these studies emphasize that successful commercialization strategies should be tailored to the expectations and motivations of different consumer groups rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all approach.
However, cognitive drivers such as sustainability and environmental claims do not always translate into purchasing behaviour. A systematic review by Onwezen et al. [107] indicates that affective responses, including food neophobia and familiarity, often outweigh rational evaluations. Although consumers may acknowledge environmental benefits, actual consumption is more strongly influenced by taste, familiarity, and perceived price. Günden et al. [106] further emphasized that behavioural barriers, including uncertainty, unfamiliarity, and lack of knowledge, can limit acceptance of novel foods despite positive attitudes.
Within plant-based innovations, acceptance typically follows a familiarity–neophobia continuum. More established plant-based foods (e.g., pulses and conventional meat substitutes) are more widely accepted due to dietary familiarity, whereas novel foods such as algae often face greater resistance [107]. Within this framework, microgreens benefit from visual familiarity and perceived naturalness, while halophytes may encounter sensory barriers linked to salinity and unfamiliar flavour profiles. Nutritional claims can support acceptance but are rarely sufficient without positive sensory experience.
In addition to product characteristics and individual perceptions, cultural and social factors influence how consumers interpret unfamiliar foods. Food traditions, social norms, regional preferences, and previous exposure shape expectations and willingness to adopt novel products [107]. Therefore, acceptance strategies should consider not only product optimisation but also communication approaches that increase familiarity and consumer confidence.
Furthermore, convenience-related aspects influence whether initial acceptance translates into regular consumption. Preparation requirements, accessibility, availability, and compatibility with existing dietary routines can determine the integration of novel vegetables into everyday diets. Both sensory quality and practical usability therefore contribute to sustained consumption patterns [100,106].
Table 1. Key intrinsic and extrinsic quality dimensions affecting consumer perception, acceptance, and purchasing decisions for horticultural products.
Table 1. Key intrinsic and extrinsic quality dimensions affecting consumer perception, acceptance, and purchasing decisions for horticultural products.
DimensionKey ComponentsConsumer RelevanceMain Evidence
External quality standardsSize, shape, colour, absence of defectsBasis for trade classification; limited role in sensory acceptance[94]
Intrinsic sensory attributesFlavour, texture, aroma, freshness, bitterness–sweetness balance, mouthfeelPrimary determinant of liking and repeat purchase[100,101]
Extrinsic cuesOrigin, price, branding, sustainability claims, geographical indicationsShapes expectations and perceived quality when intrinsic attributes are unknown[93,94]
Economic accessibility (price and affordability)Price level, affordability, willingness to pay, value for money, price–quality perceptionStrong determinant of purchasing decisions, particularly for novel vegetable products. Consumers are generally willing to pay a premium when health, quality, safety, or sustainability benefits are clearly perceived, whereas high prices may constitute an important barrier to market adoption.[103,104]
Consumer heterogeneitySegmentation by preference for taste, freshness, sustainability, originDetermines market positioning strategies for novel products[103]
Cognitive vs. affective driversSustainability, health, ethics vs. taste, familiarity, price, neophobiaAffective responses often dominate final purchasing decisions[107]
Familiarity and neophobiaDietary familiarity, perceived naturalness, exposure to novel foodsStrong predictor of acceptance of novel vegetables and plant-based products[107]
Cultural and social influencesFood traditions, cultural norms, social environment, peer influence, regional preferencesShape interpretation of unfamiliar products and willingness to adopt new foods[106]
Convenience and usage contextPreparation requirements, availability, accessibility, compatibility with dietary routinesInfluences whether initial acceptance translates into regular consumption and integration into everyday diets[100,106]
Overall, successful innovation in vegetable products requires an integrated strategy combining: (i) optimisation of intrinsic sensory quality, (ii) consideration of consumer heterogeneity, (iii) ensuring economic accessibility through appropriate pricing and value communication, (iv) effective use of credible extrinsic quality cues and (v) reduction in behavioural barriers through familiarity, convenience, and appropriate communication strategies. The interaction of these dimensions determines both initial acceptance and long-term consumption.

7. Branding

Traditionally, fresh vegetables have been offered to consumers as unbranded products, with growers making little use of innovation to differentiate their products, resulting in minimal distinctions beyond basic attributes such as price, appearance, and availability [108]. This lack of brands may be explained by the inherent limitations of the crop production sector, such as the predominance of numerous small-scale farms and the nature of vegetable products, which are seasonal, highly perishable, and difficult to differentiate. In addition to the difficulties on the producer side and in the product, it is necessary to understand the effects of brand and fresh product marketing on consumer behaviour and choice. Nowadays, branding strategies have progressively become a central component of marketing activities, and it has become increasingly common for food products to be marketed as branded goods. Effective brand management can help farmers differentiate their products, highlight unique characteristics, and create stronger connections with consumers [109]. In this context, branding represents a strategic innovation that can transform both tangible and intangible product attributes, particularly by emphasizing aspects such as provenance, quality, and production methods [108].
Different branding strategies can be adopted depending on product characteristics, market objectives, and the profile of agricultural entrepreneurs. A specific strategy, typically associated with widely consumed products, involves exclusive framework agreements between vegetable breeding companies that supply specialized products and producers who cultivate them exclusively, ensuring consistently superior quality standards. Some of the most well-known examples are ‘Kumato’ and ‘Monterosa’ tomatoes, ‘Fashion’ seedless watermelon, ‘Sweet Palermo’ pepper, etc. [59]. This approach remains active, exemplified by recent partnerships including a collaboration between a Dutch breeding company and a consortium of Spanish melon growers to develop the Galkia™ Galia melon, distinguished by consistent quality, superior flavour and extended shelf life, as well as an alliance between a French seed company and three Andalusian enterprises to commercialize the chocolate-brown RAF tomato ‘Adora’.
A related strategy has been in the melon sector through long-established brands associated with high-quality Piel de Sapo melons. These brands belong to agricultural companies that carefully select cultivars and implement strict production protocols to guarantee consistent taste and sweetness year-round, relying on crops grown in different countries to ensure a continuous supply.
Beyond product-based branding, the communication of origin and producer identity represents another powerful strategy. Local identity can increase consumer demand for foods associated with a specific place or region of origin [110], enhance perceived product credibility, and strengthen customer loyalty through a strategy commonly referred to as Farmer Identity Marketing. Consumers often prefer locally produced goods because they believe these products are fresher and of higher quality [111], while also supporting the local economy and contributing to rural development [112]. Overall, farm branding also strengthens a producer–consumer relationship. In this regard, the strategy used in countries such as Japan is particularly noteworthy: products are often marketed with a photograph of the farmer, along with the farm name and region of origin, thereby reinforcing transparency and authenticity and humanizing the supply chain.
Sustainability attributes provide an additional opportunity for differentiation. Consumers with strong environmental concerns tend to show greater interest in organically produced vegetables and eco-labelled products. When sustainability information is clearly communicated, eco-labels can improve product perception and increase purchase intention by helping consumers identify environmentally responsible options [113].
Finally, celebrity endorsement tends to generate stronger purchase intentions when there is a high level of congruence between the celebrity and the brand. When consumers perceive a natural fit between the endorser and the product, the message becomes more credible and persuasive, resulting in more favourable brand evaluations, deeper emotional connections, and ultimately higher purchase intention [114].

8. Addressing the Value Chain for New Vegetable Products

The successful development of new vegetable products depends not only on breeding and cultivation but also on the establishment of efficient and sustainable value chains that facilitate the transformation of agricultural raw materials into marketable products that satisfy consumer needs and preferences. In the context of the modern farm-to-fork approach, vegetable value chains have evolved from production-oriented systems into integrated, market-driven networks that emphasize quality, nutritional value, sustainability, traceability, and resilience. Rather than focusing exclusively on maximizing yield, these value chains seek to optimize product quality, environmental performance, consumer satisfaction, and economic returns for all stakeholders involved [115]. In addition, the value chain dictates how that brand-consumer value is created and delivered.
For innovative vegetables, the value chain starts with the conservation and utilization of germplasm, followed by breeding, seed multiplication, commercial cultivation, postharvest handling, processing, distribution, and market positioning. Throughout this process, value can be added through quality certification, branding strategies, and the promotion of distinctive traits such as nutritional value, climate resilience, or links to local heritage. The commercialization of crops such as Salicornia demonstrates that successful market adoption relies on coordinated efforts among researchers, breeders, producers, processors, retailers, and consumers [116,117].
Digital technologies are increasingly supporting more transparent and efficient agri-food value chains. Blockchain-based traceability systems, together with Internet of Things (IoT) technologies, improve product integrity, food safety, resource efficiency, and consumer confidence by enabling real-time monitoring throughout the production process [118]. These tools also facilitate compliance with increasingly demanding quality assurance and traceability standards. Despite significant progress, several challenges continue to constrain the effective integration of stakeholders into modern agri-food value chains. Climate change threatens production stability, while inadequate postharvest infrastructure contributes to substantial losses of highly perishable vegetables, particularly in developing countries [115]. In addition, consumers increasingly demand sustainable production practices, pesticide-free products, and full traceability. For functional vegetables, commercialization also requires compliance with regulatory frameworks governing nutrition and health claims, which must be supported by robust scientific evidence. Therefore, the future success of new vegetable products will depend on integrating resilient production systems, efficient postharvest management, digital traceability, and effective market differentiation within sustainable and inclusive value chains.

9. Conclusions

Vegetable crop diversification is a strategic pathway to enhance both agricultural sustainability and producers’ competitiveness. Native resources and underutilized crops represent underexploited assets, particularly because of their nutritional and functional qualities, which are becoming central drivers of product differentiation. In this context, halophytes offer a distinctive opportunity for diversification under climate change conditions. However, market innovation remains largely concentrated on well-established species. In addition, the concept of “superfood” is commercially potent but scientifically imprecise. Ultimately, consumer acceptance is shaped more by taste and familiarity than by ethical considerations, positioning branding as a key differentiating tool in the commercialization of horticulture.
While this review mainly draws upon evidence and representative case studies from Mediterranean horticultural systems, where research on innovative vegetable products is particularly well developed, examples from Asia, Africa, and Latin America have also been included to broaden the international perspective. Nevertheless, the diversity of local vegetable resources and production systems worldwide means that some findings should be interpreted within their regional context, and further geographically focused reviews would complement the broader framework presented here.
Future research should prioritize the domestication of promising underutilized vegetable species, breeding programs aimed at improving resilience and quality traits, the development of standardized cultivation protocols, comprehensive food safety assessments, and the establishment of efficient and sustainable value chains to facilitate market adoption. Equal priority should be given to the ethical and socio-legal dimensions of vegetable commercialization, including equitable benefit-sharing with the custodian communities of traditional and native genetic resources. The applicability of these strategies will depend on regional agroecological conditions, market demand, available infrastructure, and economic feasibility. Therefore, implementation should be adapted to local production systems and socio-economic contexts. Achieving these objectives will require interdisciplinary approaches that combine horticultural science, plant breeding, food technology, nutrition, consumer behavior, and marketing to successfully translate scientific advances into commercially viable, competitive, and sustainable vegetable products.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally to this manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. La Malfa, G.; Leonardi, C. Crop practices and techniques: Trends and needs. Acta Hortic. 2001, 559, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Molina, M.; Pardo-de-Santayana, M.; Tardío, J. Natural production and cultivation of Mediterranean wild edibles. In Mediterranean Wild Edible Plants; Sánchez-Mata, M.C., Tardío, J., Eds.; Springer Science and Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 81–107. [Google Scholar]
  3. Signore, A.; Renna, M.; Fernández, J.A. Editorial: Edible halophytes for a sustainable agriculture: From neglected species to new crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1504271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gruda, N.S.; Dong, J.; Li, X. From salinity to nutrient-rich vegetables: Strategies for quality enhancement in protected cultivation. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2024, 43, 327–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mabhaudhi, T.; Hlahla, S.; Chimonyo, V.G.P.; Henriksson, R.; Chibarabada, T.P.; Murugani, V.G.; Groner, V.P.; Tadele, Z.; Sobratee, N.; Slotow, R.; et al. Diversity and diversification: Ecosystem services derived from underutilized crops and their co-benefits for sustainable agricultural landscapes and resilient food systems in Africa. Front. Agron. 2022, 4, 859223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Weiss, J.; Gruda, N.S. Enhancing nutritional quality in vegetables through breeding and cultivar choice in protected cultivation. Sci. Hortic. 2025, 339, 113914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lara, S.W. Forgotten crops, future crops? Perspectives and potential of minor varieties and underutilised crops in diversified food systems. Transl. Food Sci. 2025, 1, vxaf016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Knez, M.; Ranić, M.; Gurinović, M. Underutilized plants increase biodiversity, improve food and nutrition security, reduce malnutrition, and enhance human health and well-being. Nutr. Rev. 2024, 82, 1111–1124. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Renna, M.; Signore, A.; Paradiso, V.M.; Santamaria, P. Faba greens, globe artichoke’s offshoots, crenate broomrape and summer squash greens: Unconventional vegetables of Puglia (Southern Italy) with good quality traits. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Tüzel, Y.; Kayıkçıoğlu, H.H.; Durdu, T.; Harouna, O.S.; Tunalı, U.; Öztekin, G.B.; Tutal, A.; Tepecik, M.; Kaygısız, T.; Kandemir, B.N.; et al. Enhancing tomato drought resilience with organic amendments and local landraces. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 26172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Hunter, D.; Borelli, T.; Beltrame, D.M.O.; Oliveira, C.N.S.; Coradin, L.; Wasike, V.W.; Wasilwa, L.; Mwai, J.; Manjella, A.; Samarasinghe, G.W.L.; et al. The potential of neglected and underutilized species for improving diets and nutrition. Planta 2019, 250, 709–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Shelef, O.; Weisberg, P.J.; Provenza, F.D. The value of native plants and local production in an era of global agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Platis, D.P.; Papoui, E.; Bantis, F.; Katsiotis, A.; Koukounaras, A.; Mamolos, A.P.; Mattas, K. Underutilized vegetable crops in the Mediterranean region: A literature review of their requirements and the ecosystem services provided. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Barrett, E. Neglected and underutilized species: Promoting valuable crops in organic agroforestry systems. In Integrating Landscapes: Agroforestry for Biodiversity Conservation and Food Sovereignty; Montagnini, F., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; Volume 14. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ul Abideen, M.Z.; Zia, M.A.B.; Munawar, I.; Sanaullah, M. Role of neglected crops under multi-stress conditions. In Climate Smart Agriculture for Future Food Security; Faiz, S., Ashraf, U., Attia, K.A., Amir, R.M., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  16. Petropoulos, S.A.; Karkanis, A.; Martins, N.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Edible halophytes of the Mediterranean basin: Potential candidates for novel food products. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 74, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Warwick, S.I.; Stewart, C.N. Crops come from wild plants—How domestication, transgenes, and linkage together shape ferality. In Crop Ferality and Volunteerism; Gressel, J., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hall, M.; Jobling, J.; Rogers, G. Some perspectives on rocket as a vegetable crop: A review. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. 2012, 76, 21–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sulaiman, N.; Aziz, M.A.; Stryamets, N.; Mattalia, G.; Zocchi, D.M.; Ahmed, H.M.; Manduzai, A.K.; Shah, A.A.; Faiz, A.; Sõukand, R.; et al. The importance of becoming tamed: Wild food plants as possible novel crops in selected food-insecure regions. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Somma, A.; Palmitessa, O.D.; Leoni, B.; Signore, A.; Renna, M.; Santamaria, P. Extraseasonal production in a soilless system and characterisation of landraces of Carosello and Barattiere (Cucumis melo L.). Sustainability 2021, 13, 11425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bal, S.; Chattopadhyay, A.; Hazra, P. Utilization of crop wild relatives in vegetable breeding programs could enhance crop adaptation to challenging environments. In Ecologically Mediated Development; Jatav, H.S., Rajput, V.D., Minkina, T., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2025; Volume 41. [Google Scholar]
  22. Romanelli, C.; Cooper, H.; Campbell-Lendrum, D.; Maiero, M.; Karesh, W.; Hunter, D.; Golden, C. Connecting Global Priorities: Biodiversity and Human Health, a State of Knowledge Review; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gupta, E.; Mishra, P. Functional food with some health benefits, so called superfood: A review. Curr. Nutr. Food Sci. 2020, 17, 144–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kyriacou, M.C.; Rouphael, Y.; Di Gioia, F.; Kyratzis, A.; Serio, F.; Renna, M.; De Pascale, S.; Santamaria, P. Micro-scale vegetable production and the rise of microgreens. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 57, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. da Cunha, M.A.; Paraguassú, L.A.A.; Assis, J.G.; Silva, A.B.d.P.C.; Cardoso, R.d.C.V. Urban gardening and neglected and underutilized species in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2020, 16, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Swiderska, K.; Argumedo, A.; Wekesa, C.; Ndalilo, L.; Song, Y.; Rastogi, A.; Ryan, P. Indigenous peoples’ food systems and biocultural heritage: Addressing indigenous priorities using decolonial and interdisciplinary research approaches. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kaur, S.; Kaur, G.; Kumari, A.; Ghosh, A.; Singh, G.; Bhardwaj, R.; Kumar, A.; Riar, A. Resurrecting forgotten crops: Food-based products from potential underutilized crops as a path to nutritional security and diversity. Future Foods 2025, 11, 100585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ndlovu, M.; Scheelbeek, P.; Ngidi, M.; Mabhaudhi, T. Underutilized crops for diverse, resilient and healthy agri-food systems: A systematic review of sub-Saharan Africa. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2024, 8, 1498402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Nguyen Brémaud, M.-F.E.; de Mey, Y.; Meuwissen, M.P.M. The economics of underutilized crops in Europe: A scoping literature review. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 2026, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Marappan, K.; Arumugam, V.A.; Mariyappillai, A.; Subramani, M. Nutritional content of underutilized vegetable crops: A source for nutritional security and human health. Asian Res. J. Agric. 2024, 17, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Prakash Singh, S.; Kumar Jena, A.; Deuri, R.; Sharma, P. Underutilized vegetable crops and their importance. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2018, 7, 402–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Adelabu, D.B.; Franke, A.C. Status of underutilized crop production: Its potentials for mitigating food insecurity. Agron. J. 2023, 115, 2174–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Padulosi, S.; Hodgkin, T.; Williams, J.T.; Haq, N. Underutilized crops: Trends, challenges and opportunities in the 21st century. In Managing Plant Genetic Diversity Proceedings of the International Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 12–16 June 2000; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2002; pp. 323–338. [Google Scholar]
  34. FAO. Future Smart Food: Rediscovering Hidden Treasures of Neglected and Underutilized Species for Zero Hunger in Asia; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Bangkok, Thailand, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  35. Vera-Vega, M.; Jimenez-Davalos, J.; Zolla, G. The micronutrient content in underutilized crops: The Lupinus mutabilis sweet case. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 15162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Rani, J. Nutritional and health benefits of the underutilized crop moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia L.). Legume Sci. 2023, 5, e187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Purba, N.H.; Krishnaswamy, K. Exploring the potentials of neglected underutilized crops (NUCs): An integrative review for developing a sustainable food system model. npj Sci. Food 2025, 9, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Somma, A.; Didonna, A.; Gattullo, C.A.; Durante, M.; Gonnella, M.; Di Spiridione, C.; Signore, A.; Palmitessa, O.D.; Terzano, R.; Santamaria, P. Revealing the nutritional potential of nine vegetable melon (Cucumis melo L.) landraces of the Puglia region (Southern Italy). J. Food Compos. Anal. 2026, 150, 108882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kumar, S.; Shree, B.; Sharma, S.; Sharma, A.; Priyanka. Tree tomato: Underutilized vegetable for sustainable nutritional and economic security. Sci. Hortic. 2024, 327, 112824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. de Araújo, F.F.; de Paulo Farias, D.; Neri-Numa, I.A.; Pastore, G.M. Underutilized plants of the Cactaceae family: Nutritional aspects and technological applications. Food Chem. 2021, 362, 130196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Moyo, M.; Amoo, S.O.; Ncube, B.; Ndhlala, A.R.; Finnie, J.F.; Van Staden, J. Phytochemical and antioxidant properties of unconventional leafy vegetables consumed in southern Africa. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2013, 84, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Renna, M.; De Cillis, F.; Leoni, B.; Acciardi, E.; Santamaria, P. From by-product to unconventional vegetable: Preliminary evaluation of fresh fava hulls highlights richness in L-DOPA and low content of anti-nutritional factors. Foods 2020, 9, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hong, J.; Gruda, N.S. The potential of introduction of Asian vegetables in Europe. Horticulturae 2020, 6, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Alam, M.K.; Rana, Z.H.; Kabir, N.; Begum, P.; Kawsar, M.; Khatun, M.; Ahsan, M.; Islam, S.N. Total phenolics, total carotenoids and antioxidant activity of selected unconventional vegetables growing in Bangladesh. Curr. Nutr. Food Sci. 2020, 16, 1088–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Silva, L.F.L.E.; Souza, D.C.; Nassur, R.C.M.R.; Bittencourt, W.J.M.; Resende, L.V.; Gonçalves, W.M. Nutritional characterisation and grouping of unconventional vegetables in Brazil. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 96, 508–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Renna, M.; Mauro, R.P.; Cardarelli, M.; Conversa, G. Potential exploitation of Mediterranean wild halophyte species: Four case studies for a sustainable horticulture. Italus Hortus 2025, 32, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ksouri, R.; Smaoui, A.; Isoda, H.; Abdelly, C. Utilization of halophyte species as new sources of bioactive substances. J. Arid Land Stud. 2012, 22, 41–44. [Google Scholar]
  48. Renna, M. Wild edible plants as a source of mineral elements in the daily diet. Prog. Nutr. 2017, 19, 219–222. [Google Scholar]
  49. Barkla, B.J.; Farzana, T.; Rose, T.J. Commercial cultivation of edible halophytes: The issue of oxalates and potential mitigation options. Agronomy 2024, 14, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fitzner, M.; Schreiner, M.; Baldermann, S. Comprehensive characterization of selected phytochemicals and minerals of edible halophytes grown in saline indoor farming for future food production. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2023, 122, 105435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Benaissa, R.R.; Giménez, A.; Gallegos-Cedillo, V.M.; Egea-Gilabert, C.; Gómez, P.A.; Ochoa, J.; Fernández, J.A. Effect of exogenous melatonin on Salicornia fruticosa plants grown in saline environments. Acta Hortic. 2025, 1437, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lopes, M.; Sanches-Silva, A.; Castilho, M.; Cavaleiro, C.; Ramos, F. Halophytes as a source of bioactive phenolic compounds and their potential applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 1078–1101. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Amoruso, F.; Signore, A.; Gómez, P.A.; Martínez-Ballesta, M.C.; Giménez, A.; Franco, J.A.; Fernández, J.A.; Egea-Gilabert, C. Effect of saline nutrient solution on yield, quality, and shelf-life of sea fennel (Crithmum maritimum L.) plants. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Labiad, M.H.; Giménez, A.; Varol, H.; Tüzel, Y.; Egea-Gilabert, C.; Fernández, J.A.; Martínez-Ballesta, M.C. Effect of exogenously applied methyl jasmonate on yield and quality of salt-stressed hydroponically grown sea fennel (Crithmum maritimum L.). Agronomy 2021, 11, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Egea-Gilabert, C.; Ruiz-Hernández, M.V.; Parra, M.A.; Fernández, J.A. Characterization of purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) accessions: Suitability as a ready-to-eat product. Sci. Hortic. 2014, 172, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Giménez, A.; Martínez-Ballesta, M.C.; Egea-Gilabert, C.; Gómez, P.A.; Artés-Hernández, F.; Pennisi, G.; Orsini, F.; Crepaldi, A.; Fernández, J.A. Combined effect of salinity and LED lights on the yield and quality of purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) microgreens. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Romojaro, A.; Botella, M.Á.; Obón, C.; Pretel, M.T. Nutritional and antioxidant properties of wild edible plants and their use as potential ingredients in the modern diet. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 64, 944–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ben Hamed, B.; Castagna, A.; Ranieri, A.; García-Caparrós, P.; Santín, M.; Hernández, J.A.; Espín, G.B. Halophyte-based Mediterranean agriculture in the contexts of food insecurity and global climate change. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 191, 104601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fernández, J.A.; Orsini, F.; Baeza, E.; Öztekin, G.B.; Muñoz, P.; Contreras, J.; Montero, J.I. Current trends in protected cultivation in Mediterranean climates. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 2018, 83, 294–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wyenandt, C.A.; van Vuuren, M.M.I. 2026/2027 Mid-Atlantic Commercial Vegetable Production Recommendations; Rutgers Cooperative Extension: New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 2026. [Google Scholar]
  61. Wang, J.; Ma, T.; Wang, L.; Lan, T.; Fang, Y.; Sun, X. Research on the consumption trend, nutritional value, biological activity evaluation, and sensory properties of mini fruits and vegetables. Foods 2021, 10, 2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. de Gooijer, F.J.; Lasschuijt, M.; Feskens, E.J.M.; Camps, G. Automated registration of snacking behavior in 3- to 7-year-old children using SnackBox technology. Appetite 2025, 214, 108201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Roe, L.S.; Meengs, J.S.; Birch, L.L.; Rolls, B.J. Serving a variety of vegetables and fruit as a snack increased intake in preschool children. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 98, 693–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Hamdi, A.; Hasan Yusuf, E.; Rodríguez-Arcos, R.; Jiménez-Araujo, A.; Nowicka, P.; Guillén-Bejarano, R.; Jaramillo-Carmona, S. Small but mighty: Low bio-accessibility preserves polyphenols from mini purple carrots for direct action against colon cancer cells. Antioxidants 2026, 15, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lone, J.K.; Pandey, R.; Gayacharan. Microgreens on the rise: Expanding our horizons from farm to fork. Heliyon 2024, 10, e25870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Balik, S.; Elgudayem, F.; Daşgan, H.Y.; Kafkas, N.E.; Gruda, N.S. Nutritional quality profiles of six microgreens. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 6213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Johnson, M.A.; Thakur, S. Sprouts, microgreens, and baby leaves cultivation in controlled environment agriculture—A panacea for global food and nutritional security. Food Biosci. 2025, 66, 107579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dincer, B.S.; Gallegos-Cedillo, V.M.; Giménez-Martínez, A.; Ochoa, J.; Egea-Gilabert, C.; Gruda, N.S.; Domínguez-Perles, R.; Moreno, D.A.; Fernández, J.A. The impact of growing media on the phytochemical composition of Eruca sativa L. and Diplotaxis tenuifolia L. microgreens. Acta Hortic. 2025, 1437, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Aliniaeifard, S.; Azizi, S.; Zarbakhsh, S.; Esmaeili, S.; Baghalian, K.; Gruda, N.S. Light in controlled environment agriculture. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 2025, 31, 615–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Azizi, S.; Aliniaeifard, S.; Zarbakhsh, S.; Esmaeili, S.; Baghalian, K.; Gruda, N.S. Photobiology, photosynthesis, and plant responses under artificial lighting in controlled environment agriculture. Sci. Hortic. 2025, 349, 114248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rodríguez-Sánchez-de-Molina, N.; Fernández-Lancis, V.; Kaabi, S.; Arnao, M.B.; Fernández, J.A.; Egea-Gilabert, C.; Martínez-Hernández, G.B. Edible substrates for ready-to-eat microgreen pots: “Farm on the fork” concept. Plants 2026, 15, 49. [Google Scholar]
  72. Rani, R.; Chanu, S.Y.; Sharma, G.S.; Mondal, N.; Mohanty, D. Genetic enhancement of leguminous microgreens: A frontier in sustainable nutrition. In Recent Trends and Applications of Leguminous Microgreens as Functional Foods; Mathur, P., Gupta, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  73. Santos, J.; Herrero, M.; Mendiola, J.A.; Oliva-Teles, M.T.; Ibáñez, E.; Delerue-Matos, C.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P. Assessment of nutritional and metabolic profiles of pea shoots: The new ready-to-eat baby-leaf vegetable. Food Res. Int. 2014, 58, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Selelepoo, O.K.; Mpai, S.; Sivakumar, D. LED spectral light combination during production preserves the phytonutritional composition of green pea shoots (Pisum sativum L.) during postharvest storage. Sci. Hortic. 2025, 349, 114270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Fernández, J.A.; Gallegos-Cedillo, V.M.; Nájera, C.; Gallegos, J.; Ochoa, J.; Martínez-Ballesta, M.C.; Gallego, B.; Cano, M.D.; Egea-Gilabert, C. Cutting-edge technological and management innovations in vegetable seedling nurseries. Acta Hortic. 2026, 1453, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Tanis, M.; Buijzen, M. Why we believe in superfoods: Investigating attitudes, personality and message processing. Front. Commun. 2025, 10, 1661474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cobos, Á.; Díaz, O. “Superfoods”: Reliability of the information for consumers available on the web. Foods 2023, 12, 546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Santunione, G.; Montevecchi, G. Superfoods: Exploring sustainability perspectives between nutrient synthesizers and accumulators. Front. Food Sci. Technol. 2025, 5, 1507933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Franco Lucas, B.; Götze, F.; Vieira Costa, J.A.; Brunner, T.A. Consumer perception toward “superfoods”: A segmentation study. J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 2023, 35, 603–621. [Google Scholar]
  80. Marggraf, A.; Sanz, M.J. Environmental and social consequences of the increase in the demand for “superfoods” worldwide. People Nat. 2020, 2, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Singh, M.P.; Soni, K.; Bhamra, R.; Mittal, R.K. Superfood: Value and need. Curr. Nutr. Food Sci. 2022, 18, 65–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. McDonell, E. Nutrition politics in the quinoa boom: Connecting consumer and producer nutrition in the commercialization of traditional foods. Int. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2016, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Connolly, E.L.; Sim, M.; Travica, N.; Marx, W.; Beasy, G.; Lynch, G.S.; Bondonno, C.P.; Lewis, J.R.; Hodgson, J.M.; Blekkenhorst, L.C. Glucosinolates from cruciferous vegetables and their potential role in chronic disease: Investigating the preclinical and clinical evidence. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 767975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Miękus, N.; Marszałek, K.; Podlacha, M.; Iqbal, A.; Puchalski, C.; Świergiel, A.H. Health benefits of plant-derived sulfur compounds, glucosinolates, and organosulfur compounds. Molecules 2020, 25, 3804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Bian, Z.H.; Yang, Q.C.; Liu, W.K. Effects of light quality on the accumulation of phytochemicals in vegetables produced in controlled environments: A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2015, 95, 869–877. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Rouphael, Y.; Kyriacou, M.C. Enhancing quality of fresh vegetables through salinity eustress and biofortification applications facilitated by soilless cultivation. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Xiao, Z.; Lester, G.E.; Luo, Y.; Wang, Q. Assessment of vitamin and carotenoid concentrations of emerging food products: Edible microgreens. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 7644–7651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Kyriacou, M.C.; El-Nakhel, C.; Pannico, A.; Graziani, G.; Zarrelli, A.; Soteriou, G.A.; Kyratzis, A.; Antoniou, C.; Pizzolongo, F.; Romano, R.; et al. Ontogenetic variation in the mineral, phytochemical and yield attributes of brassicaceous microgreens. Foods 2021, 10, 1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Bhaswant, M.; Shanmugam, D.K.; Miyazawa, T.; Abe, C.; Miyazawa, T. Microgreens—A comprehensive review of bioactive molecules and health benefits. Molecules 2023, 28, 867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Karmakar, B.; Roy, S. Traditional and unconventional food crops with the potential to boost health and nutrition with special reference to Asian and African countries. In Traditional Foods: The Reinvented Superfoods; Roy, S., Nisha, P., Chakraborty, R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  91. Paradiso, R.; Proietti, S. Light-quality manipulation to control plant growth and photomorphogenesis in greenhouse horticulture: The State of the Art and the Opportunities of Modern LED Systems. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 41, 742–780. [Google Scholar]
  92. Gruda, N.S.; Samuolienė, G.; Dong, J.; Li, X. Environmental conditions and nutritional quality of vegetables in protected cultivation. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2025, 24, e70139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Gruda, N.S.; Gallegos-Cedillo, V.M.; Nájera, C.; Egea-Gilabert, C.; Ochoa, J.; Fernández, J.A. Advancing protected cultivation: A pathway for nutrient-rich vegetables. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2025, 44, 88–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Gruda, N.S.; Li, X.; Gallegos-Cedillo, V.M.; Samuolienė, G.; Dong, J.; Weiss, J.; Fernández, J.A. From growth to table: Exploring the impact of pre-harvest conditions on greenhouse vegetable quality. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 2025, 90, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Baum, C.; El-Tohamy, W.; Gruda, N. Increasing the productivity and product quality of vegetable crops using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: A review. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 187, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Rouphael, Y.; Colla, G. Biostimulants in agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Puccinelli, M.; Malorgio, F.; Pezzarossa, B. Selenium enrichment of horticultural crops. Molecules 2017, 22, 933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Wang, Z.; Li, D.; Gruda, N.S.; Zhu, C.; Duan, Z.; Li, X. How to efficiently produce selenium-enriched cucumber fruit with high yield and quality via hydroponic cultivation? The balance between selenium supply and CO2 fertilization. Agronomy 2023, 13, 922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Gruda, N. Impact of environmental factors on product quality of greenhouse vegetables for fresh consumption. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2005, 24, 227–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hoppu, U.; Puputti, S.; Sandell, M. Factors related to sensory properties and consumer acceptance of vegetables. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 2661–2676. [Google Scholar]
  101. Feng, Y.; Albiol Tapia, M.; Okada, K.; Castaneda Lazo, N.B.; Chapman-Novakofski, K.; Phillips, C.; Lee, S.-Y. Consumer acceptance comparison between seasoned and unseasoned vegetables. J. Food Sci. 2018, 83, 575–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Laureati, M.; De Boni, A.; Saba, A.; Lamy, E.; Minervini, F.; Delgado, A.M.; Sinesio, F. Determinants of Consumers’ Acceptance and Adoption of Novel Food in View of More Resilient and Sustainable Food Systems in the EU: A Systematic Literature Review. Foods 2024, 13, 1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Alsubhi, M.; Blake, M.; Nguyen, T.; Majmudar, I.; Moodie, M.; Ananthapavan, J. Consumer willingness to pay for healthier food products: A systematic review. Obes. Rev. 2023, 24, e13525. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  104. Zhang, B.; Fu, Z.; Huang, J.; Wang, J.; Xu, S.; Zhang, L. Consumers’ perceptions, purchase intention, and willingness to pay a premium price for safe vegetables: A case study of Beijing, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 197, 1498–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Massaglia, S.; Borra, D.; Peano, C.; Sottile, F.; Merlino, V.M. Consumer preference heterogeneity evaluation in fruit and vegetable purchasing decisions using the best–worst approach. Foods 2019, 8, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Günden, C.; Atakan, P.; Yercan, M.; Mattas, K.; Knez, M. Consumer Response to Novel Foods: A Review of Behavioral Barriers and Drivers. Foods 2024, 13, 2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Onwezen, M.C.; Bouwman, E.P.; Reinders, M.J.; Dagevos, H. A systematic review on consumer acceptance of alternative proteins: Pulses, algae, insects, plant-based meat alternatives, and cultured meat. Appetite 2021, 159, 105058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Lewis, G.; Crispin, S.; Bonney, L.; Woods, M.; Fei, J.; Ayala, S.; Miles, M. Branding as innovation within agribusiness value chains. J. Res. Mark. Entrep. 2014, 16, 146–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Umarjonovna, N.G. The role of branding in successful farm marketing. Cent. Asian J. Multidiscip. Res. Manag. Stud. 2025, 2, 127–131. [Google Scholar]
  110. Hu, W.; Batte, M.T.; Woods, T.; Ernst, S. Consumer preferences for local production and other value-added label claims for a processed food product. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2012, 39, 489–510. [Google Scholar]
  111. Feldmann, C.; Hamm, U. Consumers’ perceptions and preferences for local food: A review. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 40, 152–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Fandos, C.; Flavián, C. Intrinsic and extrinsic quality attributes, loyalty and buying intention: An analysis for a PDO product. Br. Food J. 2006, 108, 646–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Aminravan, M.; Kaliji, S.A.; Mulazzani, L.; Rota, C.; Camanzi, L. Ecolabels as a means to satisfy consumers’ environmental concerns, need for information, and trust in short fruit and vegetable supply chains: A cross-national study. Agric. Econ. 2025, 13, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Calvo-Porral, C.; Lévy-Mangin, J.-P. The influence of celebrity endorsement on the purchase behavior of brands and product categories. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2024, 33, 1027–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. FAO. The State of Food and Agriculture; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  116. Salazar, O.R.; Chen, K.; Melino, V.J.; Reddy, M.P.; Hřibová, E.; Čížková, J.; Beránková, D.; Vega, J.P.A.; Leal, L.M.C.; Aranda, M.; et al. SOS1 tonoplast neo-localization and the RGG protein SALTY are important in the extreme salinity tolerance of Salicornia bigelovii. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 4279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Plant Research Could Pave the Way for Growing Crops with Seawater. 16 July 2024. Available online: https://phys.org/news/2024-07-pave-crops-seawater.html (accessed on 6 July 2026).
  118. Villafranca, A.; Tasic, I.; Gallegos, V.; Gimenez, A.; Ochoa, J.; Fernandez, J.A.; Cano, M.D. Comparing blockchain and DAG technologies for smart agriculture traceability in terms of efficiency and latency. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 2025, 142, 103131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Conceptual framework of neglected and underutilized vegetable crops, illustrating their definition, the main causes of marginalization, and their nutritional, agronomic, environmental, economic, and socio-historical value.
Figure 1. Conceptual framework of neglected and underutilized vegetable crops, illustrating their definition, the main causes of marginalization, and their nutritional, agronomic, environmental, economic, and socio-historical value.
Horticulturae 12 00871 g001
Figure 2. Photo collection of emblematic underutilized vegetables of Mediterranean area. Offshoots of globe artichoke at harvest stage (A); summer squash greens at harvest stage (B); faba greens during washing (C); crenate broomrape at harvest stage (D).
Figure 2. Photo collection of emblematic underutilized vegetables of Mediterranean area. Offshoots of globe artichoke at harvest stage (A); summer squash greens at harvest stage (B); faba greens during washing (C); crenate broomrape at harvest stage (D).
Horticulturae 12 00871 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fernández, J.A.; Egea-Gilabert, C.; Signore, A.; Somma, A.; Renna, M.; Gruda, N.S. New Vegetable Products: From Native Genetic Resources to Innovative Developments in High-Consumption Species. Horticulturae 2026, 12, 871. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12070871

AMA Style

Fernández JA, Egea-Gilabert C, Signore A, Somma A, Renna M, Gruda NS. New Vegetable Products: From Native Genetic Resources to Innovative Developments in High-Consumption Species. Horticulturae. 2026; 12(7):871. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12070871

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fernández, Juan A., Catalina Egea-Gilabert, Angelo Signore, Annalisa Somma, Massimiliano Renna, and Nazim S. Gruda. 2026. "New Vegetable Products: From Native Genetic Resources to Innovative Developments in High-Consumption Species" Horticulturae 12, no. 7: 871. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12070871

APA Style

Fernández, J. A., Egea-Gilabert, C., Signore, A., Somma, A., Renna, M., & Gruda, N. S. (2026). New Vegetable Products: From Native Genetic Resources to Innovative Developments in High-Consumption Species. Horticulturae, 12(7), 871. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12070871

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop