Effects of Rootstocks on the Physicochemical Properties and Volatile Profiles of ‘Shine Muscat’ Cv Grape Grown in Hot Regions of Southern China
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Materials and Treatment
2.2. Measurement of Physicochemical Index
2.3. Metabolomics Analysis
2.3.1. Extraction of Volatile Aroma Compound from Berries
2.3.2. Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Analysis
2.3.3. OAV Analysis
2.3.4. qRT-PCR Analysis
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Effects of Rootstocks on ‘Shine Muscat’ Berry Basic Physicochemical Parameters
3.2. Volatile Profiles in ‘Shine Muscat’ Berry
3.3. Characteristic Aroma and Odor Profiles in ‘Shine Muscat’ Berry
3.4. Integrated Analysis of Aroma Biosynthetic Pathways and Related Gene Expression
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Liu, K.; Zhang, R.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wen, J.; Xue, L.; Li, Q. Present Situation Analysis and Development Countermeasures of Grape Industry in China. China Fruits 2024, 132–138. Available online: https://link.oversea.cnki.net/doi/10.16626/j.cnki.issn1000-8047.2024.07.020 (accessed on 25 May 2026).
- OIV. OIV Statistical Brief: Wine, Table Grapes & Dried Grapes in 2024; International Organisation of Vine and Wine: Dijon, France, 2025; Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=0E3RU1Fdg_MUdjp7lUHjmLvOFnlw5WWH52cPFF3_dPmKjBslvVkc-tltLca07KGU_Mujilq7RbTp2pZ0gPORsZNdURDFK6mYfvfQ8OehyXxAChFv6rcU6-NKU36z_Sm7qDnTbgxrMWpnl3Z3AmameQ0jnv6OEJqud1HPEa5w_FE=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS (accessed on 25 May 2026).
- Yamada, M.; Yamane, H.; Sato, A.; Hirakawa, N.; Iwanami, H.; Yoshinaga, K.; Ozawa, T.; Mitani, N.; Shiraishi, M.; Yoshioka, M.; et al. New Grape Cultivar “Shine Muscat”. Bull. Natl. Inst. Fruit Tree Sci. Jpn. 2008, 21–38. Available online: https://www.naro.go.jp/english/about-naro/recent/shine-muscat/index.html (accessed on 25 May 2026).
- Wang, W.; Khalil-Ur-Rehman, M.; Wei, L.-L.; Nieuwenhuizen, N.J.; Zheng, H.; Tao, J.-M. Effect of Thidiazuron on Terpene Volatile Constituents and Terpenoid Biosynthesis Pathway Gene Expression of Shine Muscat (Vitis labrusca × V. vinifera) Grape Berries. Molecules 2020, 25, 2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jin, Z.; Sun, H.; Sun, T.; Wang, Q.; Yao, Y. Modifications of “Gold Finger” Grape Berry Quality as Affected by the Different Rootstocks. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 4189–4197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, P.; Zhao, F.; Zheng, T.; Liu, Z.; Ji, X.; Zhang, Z.; Pervaiz, T.; Shangguan, L.; Fang, J. Whole-Genome Re-Sequencing, Diversity Analysis, and Stress-Resistance Analysis of 77 Grape Rootstock Genotypes. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1102695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, M.; Zhang, X.; Ma, T.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liang, J.; Yao, W. Advances in Research on The Influence of Rootstocks on Grape Growth and development, fruit quality and stress resistance. J. Fruit Sci. 2026, 43, 407–423. [Google Scholar]
- Hernandes, K.C.; da Silva, D.F.; Silveira, R.D.; Ramos, E.A.; de Souza Leão, P.C.; Rybka, A.C.P.; Biasoto, A.C.T.; Zini, C.A.; Welke, J.E. Assessing Vine Training Systems and Rootstocks through a Flavoromic Approach of Grape Juices. Food Chem. 2026, 511, 148731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, M.; Guo, Z.; Jia, N.; Yuan, J.; Han, B.; Yin, Y.; Sun, Y.; Liu, C.; Zhao, S. Evaluation of Eight Rootstocks on the Growth and Berry Quality of ‘Marselan’ Grapevines. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 248, 58–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farris, L.; Morel, M.; Garbay, J.; Gouot, J.; Lytra, G.; Pons, A.; Riquier, L.; Suhas, E.; Marguerit, E.; Barbe, J.-C. Rootstock Effect on Vitis vinifera Cv. Cabernet Sauvignon Grape Composition and Wine Aroma Compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2025, 73, 18642–18656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gutiérrez-Gamboa, G.; Gómez-Plaza, E.; Bautista-Ortín, A.B.; Garde-Cerdán, T.; Moreno-Simunovic, Y.; Martínez-Gil, A.M. Rootstock Effects on Grape Anthocyanins, Skin and Seed Proanthocyanidins and Wine Color and Phenolic Compounds from Vitis vinifera L. Merlot Grapevines. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 2846–2854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, F.; Zhong, H.; Zhou, X.; Pan, M.; Xu, J.; Liu, M.; Wang, M.; Liu, G.; Xu, T.; Wang, Y.; et al. Grafting with Rootstocks Promotes Phenolic Compound Accumulation in Grape Berry Skin during Development Based on Integrative Multi-Omics Analysis. Hortic. Res. 2022, 9, uhac055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Klimek, K.; Kapłan, M.; Najda, A. Influence of Rootstock on Yield Quantity and Quality, Contents of Biologically Active Compounds and Antioxidant Activity in Regent Grapevine Fruit. Molecules 2022, 27, 2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cheng, J.; Wei, L.; Mei, J.; Wu, J. Effect of Rootstock on Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Properties in Berries of Grape (Vitis Vinifera L.) Cv. ‘Red Alexandria’. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 217, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, C.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Shi, W.; Zhang, D.; Zhao, B.; Sun, J. “140R” Rootstock Regulates Resveratrol Content in “Cabernet Sauvignon” Grapevine Leaves Through miRNA. Plants 2024, 13, 3057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yıldırım, K.; Yağcı, A.; Sucu, S.; Tunç, S. Responses of Grapevine Rootstocks to Drought through Altered Root System Architecture and Root Transcriptomic Regulations. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 127, 256–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, B.; Liu, Z.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, W.; Lu, Q.; Sun, J. Saline-Alkaline Stress Resistance of Cabernet Sauvignon Grapes Grafted on Different Rootstocks and Rootstock Combinations. Plants 2023, 12, 2881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Krishankumar, S.; Hunter, J.J.; Alyafei, M.; Souka, U.; Subramaniam, S.; Ramlal, A.; Kurup, S.S.; Amiri, K.M.A. Influence of Different Scion-Rootstock Combinations on Sugars, Polyamines, Antioxidants and Malondialdehyde in Grafted Grapevines under Arid Conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1559095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oliveira, C.R.S.d.; Mendonca Junior, A.F.d.; Leão, P.C.d.S. Rootstock Effects on Fruit Yield and Quality of ‘BRS Tainá’ Seedless Table Grape in Semi-Arid Tropical Conditions. Plants 2024, 13, 2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martinez, E.A.; Ribeiro, V.G.; Vilar, P.F.I.; Hausen, L.J.D.O.V.; Bezerra, E.D. Evaluation of Nitrogen Monitoring, Bud Fertility and ‘Thompson Seedless’ Grapevine Production on Different Rootstocks. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 2017, 39, e-950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hifny, H.A.; Baghdady, G.A.; Abdrabboh, G.A.; Sultan, M.Z.; Shahda, M.A. Effect of Rootstocks on Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of Red Globe Grape. Ann. Agric. Sci. Moshtohor 2016, 54, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lo’ay, A.A.; El-khateeb, A.Y. Evaluation the Effect of Rootstocks on Postharvest Berries Quality of ‘Flame Seedless’ Grapes. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 220, 299–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, Z.-X.; Sun, T.-Y.; Sun, H.; Yue, Q.-Y.; Yao, Y.-X. Modifications of ‘Summer Black’ Grape Berry Quality as Affected by the Different Rootstocks. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 210, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, M.; Wang, Y.; Niu, R.; Xu, Z.; Huang, X.; Chen, W. Study of Transcriptional Regulation of Vitis amurensis Rootstock to Improve Cold Tolerance. Sino-Overseas Grapev. Wine 2024, 22–29. Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=0E3RU1Fdg_PGBjK-0YI0HaRLDs0ousZO_nTDwiqAjnOsyEzrqL9dbLoGAWF0fnTz0Rbp0K9qk464WMomEKI80KOOqW1suav5UPLJI-YCB6tJ6PNEgbMUhZZ_AW79bZRb_8cqUoH_EgWqqGg4ad38lKT8zf59JWfifR_-p1NusR0=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS (accessed on 25 May 2026).
- Liao, K.; Wu, Q.; Su, C.; Shi, X.; Yang, G.; Zhong, X.; Liu, K.; Xu, F.; Wang, M.; Jin, Y.; et al. Investigation of Scion-rootstock Affinity and Related Physiological Indicators of Disease Resistance of Vitis davidii Foёx. Sino-Overseas Grapev. Wine 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Q.; Han, X.; Gao, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Qin, H.; Huang, T.; Li, X.; Chen, X.; Lin, G. Effects of Seven Rootstocks on Growth and Fruit Quality of Shine Muscat Grape. South China Fruits 2020, 49, 100–104. Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=0E3RU1Fdg_N5xAX2HWqcf0nTxIZIm0RKA5zrK2Q2KeS8xovEyzP-gZzqTIZysZp5wM_Fhq5IfejcstKAozKVKTcttDjgP7txTffDPmlTQYIqvqS1-pDSlngNLfL2qipVWK7wo0qQBubwN6u2PPnbXa0vTtv7vXc6C10BInsaCh8=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS (accessed on 25 May 2026).
- Zhang, M.; Xu, X.; Zhang, T.; Liu, Z.; Wang, X.; Shi, X.; Peng, W.; Wang, X.; Chen, Z.; Zhao, R.; et al. The Dynamics of Wild Vitis Species in Response to Climate Change Facilitate the Breeding of Grapevine and Its Rootstocks with Climate Resilience. Hortic. Res. 2025, 12, uhaf104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, Y.; Duan, S.; Zhao, L.; Gao, Z.; Luo, M.; Song, S.; Xu, W.; Zhang, C.; Ma, C.; Wang, S. Aroma Characterization Based on Aromatic Series Analysis in Table Grapes. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Song, S.; Xu, W.; Zhang, C.; Ma, C.; Wang, L.; Wang, S. Evolution of Volatile Compounds during the Development of Muscat Grape “Shine Muscat” (Vitis labrusca × V. vinifera). Food Chem. 2020, 309, 125778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, W.; Feng, J.; Wei, L.; Khalil-Ur-Rehman, M.; Nieuwenhuizen, N.J.; Yang, L.; Zheng, H.; Tao, J. Transcriptomics Integrated with Free and Bound Terpenoid Aroma Profiling during “Shine Muscat” (Vitis labrusca × V. vinifera) Grape Berry Development Reveals Coordinate Regulation of MEP Pathway and Terpene Synthase Gene Expression. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 1413–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, C.; Chen, H.; Li, Y.; Du, T.; Jia, J.; Xi, Z. The Expression of Aroma Components and Related Genes in Merlot and Marselan Scion-Rootstock Grape and Wine. Foods 2022, 11, 2777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cheng, J.; Li, H.; Wang, W.; Duan, C.; Wang, J.; He, F. The Influence of Rootstocks on the Scions’ Aromatic Profiles of Vitis vinifera L. Cv. Chardonnay. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 272, 109517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Li, C.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Xi, Z. Effects of Cultivars as Rootstocks on the Expression of Aroma Components and Related Genes in Shine Muscat Grape. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2024, 250, 1043–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J. Grafting and Improvement Technology of Grape Green Branch. North Hortic. 2021, 173–175. Available online: http://bfyy.paperonce.org/oa/DArticle.aspx?type=view&id=20201885 (accessed on 25 May 2026).
- Huang, W.; Fang, S.; Wang, J.; Zhuo, C.; Luo, Y.; Yu, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Deng, W.-W.; Ning, J. Sensomics Analysis of the Effect of the Withering Method on the Aroma Components of Keemun Black Tea. Food Chem. 2022, 395, 133549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xue, J.; Liu, P.; Yin, J.; Wang, W.; Zhang, J.; Wang, W.; Le, T.; Ni, D.; Jiang, H. Dynamic Changes in Volatile Compounds of Shaken Black Tea during Its Manufacture by GC × GC–TOFMS and Multivariate Data Analysis. Foods 2022, 11, 1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhu, J.; Niu, Y.; Xiao, Z. Characterization of the Key Aroma Compounds in Laoshan Green Teas by Application of Odour Activity Value (OAV), Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry-Olfactometry (GC-MS-O) and Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC × GC-qMS). Food Chem. 2021, 339, 128136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, Y.; Ai, L.; Mu, Z.; Liu, H.; Yan, X.; Ni, L.; Zhang, H.; Xia, Y. Flavor Compounds with High Odor Activity Values (OAV > 1) Dominate the Aroma of Aged Chinese Rice Wine (Huangjiu) by Molecular Association. Food Chem. 2022, 383, 132370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van Gemert, L.J. Odour thresholds: Compilations of Odour Threshold Values in Air, Water and Other Media; Oliemans Punter & Partners BV: Zeist, The Netherlands, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, Y.; Yuan, J.; Jia, N.; Li, M.; Liu, C.; Sun, Y.; Wang, X.; Han, S.; Gao, Q.; Liu, S.; et al. Grafting ‘Red Globe’ (Vitis vinifera) onto Multiple Rootstocks: A Systematic, Multi-Year Evaluation Focusing on Graft Compatibility, Vegetative Growth, and Fruit Characteristics. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Yao, R.; Bai, R.; Gao, D.; Zhao, B.; Sun, J.; Bao, Y.; Ouyang, Z. The Effect of Rootstock on the Activity of Key Enzymes in Acid Metabolism and the Expression of Related Genes in ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ Grapes. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Luo, H.; Chen, Y.; Lin, L.; Bai, Y.; Ma, G.; Bai, X.; Chen, A.; Wang, B. Preliminary Report on the Effect of Different Rootstocks on Growth and Fruit Quality of Shine Muscat Grape. South China Fruits 2020, 49, 103–106. [Google Scholar]
- Choi, K.-O.; Lee, D.H.; Park, S.J.; Im, D.; Hur, Y.Y.; Kim, S.J. Changes in Biochemical and Volatile Flavor Compounds of Shine Muscat at Different Ripening Stages. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiz-García, L.; Hellín, P.; Flores, P.; Fenoll, J. Prediction of Muscat Aroma in Table Grape by Analysis of Rose Oxide. Food Chem. 2014, 154, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, H.; Li, J.; Gong, Y. Analysis of Aroma Components of Juice, Wine and Brandy from ‘Shine Muscat’ Grape Grafted on Different Rootstocks. Sino-Overseas Grapev. Wine 2025, 62–74. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, W.; Wang, J.; Yang, Y.; Zheng, Q.; Xiao, H.; Chen, C.; Wen, J.; Tang, M. Effects of Different Rootstocks on Berry Aroma in ‘Shine Muscat’ Grapes. Yantai Fruits 2021, 11–13. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, G.; Wu, D.; Guo, R.; Li, H.; Wei, R.; Zhang, J.; Wei, Z.; Meng, X.; Yu, H.; Xie, L.; et al. Chromosome-scale Genomics, Metabolomics, and Transcriptomics Provide Insight into the Synthesis and Regulation of Phenols in Vitis Adenoclada Grapes. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 1124046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, L.; Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Yan, A.; Zhang, G.; Ren, J.; Xu, H. The Influence of Rootstocks on the Growth and Aromatic Quality of Two Table Grape Varieties. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2021, 54, 4405–4420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bayoumi, Y.; Abd-Alkarim, E.; El-Ramady, H.; El-Aidy, F.; Hamed, E.-S.; Taha, N.; Prohens, J.; Rakha, M. Grafting Improves Fruit Yield of Cucumber Plants Grown under Combined Heat and Soil Salinity Stresses. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C.; Harvey, J.T.; Nagila, A.; Qin, K.; Leskovar, D.I. Thermotolerance of Tomato Plants Grafted onto Wild Relative Rootstocks. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1252456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tao, M.-Q.; Jahan, M.S.; Hou, K.; Shu, S.; Wang, Y.; Sun, J.; Guo, S.-R. Bitter Melon (Momordica charantia L.) Rootstock Improves the Heat Tolerance of Cucumber by Regulating Photosynthetic and Antioxidant Defense Pathways. Plants 2020, 9, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hu, J.; Bai, S.; Chen, G.; Cai, J. Differential Evaluation of Heat Tolerance of 15 Grape Rootstocks. Xinjiang Agric. Sci. 2023, 60, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y. Physiological Responses of Different Salt-Tolerant Grape Rootstocks to NaCl Stress. Master’s Thesis, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China, June 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Yuan, J.; Wang, H.; Chen, L.; Zheng, Y.; Yin, Y.; Li, M.; Guo, Z.; Song, J.; Tang, Y.; Li, X. Tolerance of Grafted ‘Muscat Hamburg’ Grapevine Seedlings in Response to Salinity Stress. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 2023, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]



| Rootstock Varieties | Species |
|---|---|
| Beta | Vitis riparia × Vitis labrusca |
| SO4 | Vitis berlandieri × Vitis riparia |
| 5C | Vitis berlandieri × Vitis riparia |
| Fercal | Vitis berlandieri × Vitis vinifera |
| YN2 | Vitis heyneana var. adenoclada |
| Gene | Forward Primer 5′ → 3′ | Reverse Primer 5′ → 3′ |
|---|---|---|
| DXS1 | F: CTCATTTCCTGCCCATTTTAGC | R: CTTACTCCTTTGCTGGGATTGG |
| DXS3 | F: GAAGGCTCTGTTGGAGGGTTT | R:TCCTCTGGTGATGCCTGTTCT |
| DXR | F: AGAGGCTTTGGCTGACTGTGA | R:AACCTGCGCAACCTACTATTCC |
| GPPS | F: AGAATCTGGGATTGGCATTCC | R:TGGCGGATGTCAGACAATGA |
| FPPS | F: ATTGCTTATGGCAGGCGAAA | R: CCGTTCCGATCTTACCAATCAC |
| LIS | F: TGGGATTCTCTCCTGCCTTTT | R: GCAGTAGGCACAAGCACAACA |
| TPS | F:TGAAGGGAATGCTCTGCTTGT | R: TGTTTTGCTCAAGGCCCTTT |
| EF1-α | F: GAACTGGGTGCTTGATAGGC | R: AACCAAAATATCCGGAGTAAAAGA |
| Combinations | SM | SM-Beta | SM-SO4 | SM-5C | SM-Fercal | SM-YN2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berry weight (g) | 9.49 c ± 0.38 | 10.60 b ± 0.21 | 9.18 c ± 0.18 | 9.48 c ± 0.31 | 9.15 c ± 0.08 | 12.16 a ± 0.34 |
| Longitudinal diameter (cm) | 3.10 ab ± 0.06 | 3.03 bc ± 0.05 | 2.95 c ± 0.02 | 2.96 c ± 0.05 | 3.00 bc ± 0.08 | 3.18 a ± 0.06 |
| Transverse diameter (cm) | 2.43 cd ± 0.06 | 2.53 b ± 0.01 | 2.40 cd ± 0.05 | 2.46 c ± 0.03 | 2.36 d ± 0.02 | 2.68 a ± 0.02 |
| Fruit shape index | 1.28 a ± 0.04 | 1.20 b ± 0.02 | 1.23 ab ± 0.02 | 1.20 b ± 0.02 | 1.27 a ± 0.04 | 1.19 b ± 0.03 |
| TSS (°Brix) | 19.27 a ± 0.91 | 16.87 b ± 0.47 | 15.57 c ± 0.80 | 18.93 a ± 0.46 | 17.53 b ± 0.47 | 18.90 a ± 0.89 |
| pH | 4.06 ab ± 0.07 | 4.16 a ± 0.01 | 3.77 c ± 0.10 | 3.98 b ± 0.04 | 3.97 b ± 0.06 | 4.01 b ± 0.05 |
| TA (g/L) | 3.46 bc ± 0.02 | 2.81 c ± 0.22 | 4.59 a ± 0.77 | 3.61 b ± 0.16 | 3.98 ab ± 0.28 | 3.35 bc ± 0.13 |
| TSS/TA ratio | 55.65 a ± 2.88 | 60.38 a ± 6.35 | 34.70 c ± 6.88 | 52.53 ab ± 3.46 | 44.26 b ± 4.09 | 56.55 a ± 4.40 |
| L* | 35.63 ab ± 0.47 | 36.75 a ± 0.50 | 35.14 b ± 0.57 | 34.93 b ± 0.54 | 35.66 ab ± 0.41 | 36.55 a ± 1.12 |
| a* | −1.87 ab ± 0.05 | −1.81 a ± 0.10 | −2.16 b ± 0.18 | −1.99 ab ± 0.04 | −1.87 ab ± 0.20 | −2.14 ab ± 0.19 |
| b* | 7.87 c ± 0.37 | 9.41 a ± 0.51 | 8.06 bc ± 0.92 | 8.96 abc ± 0.53 | 7.87 c ± 0.76 | 9.17 ab ± 0.62 |
| Compounds | RI | SM | SM-Beta | SM-SO4 | SM-5C | SM-Fercal | SM-YN2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linalool | 1101 | 657.62 cd | 708.73 bc | 648.13 d | 713.70 bc | 754.17 b | 867.79 a |
| (E)-linalool oxide (furanoid) | 1075 | 86.70 c | 87.79 bc | 85.01 c | 88.87 bc | 93.09 ab | 97.00 a |
| Menthol | 1177 | 30.82 ab | 30.60 ab | 28.96 b | 30.10 ab | 30.63 ab | 31.39 a |
| Neral | 1240 | 25.79 a | 23.52 a | 23.75 a | 24.49 a | 26.58 a | 25.65 a |
| β-cyclocitral | 1227 | 23.64 a | 22.95 a | 24.78 a | 23.16 a | 24.72 a | 24.23 a |
| γ-terpinene | 1060 | 16.27 a | 16.22 a | 18.13 a | 17.84 a | 17.69 a | 19.86 a |
| 6,10-dimethyl -5,9-undecadien-2-one | 1452 | 15.29 a | 16.86 a | 18.03 a | 23.68 a | 22.22 a | 20.10 a |
| β-pinene | 980 | 12.79 b | 11.38 b | 16.33 a | 17.04 a | 17.18 a | 18.35 a |
| (+)-4-carene | 1009 | 12.22 b | 12.83 ab | 11.99 b | 12.54 b | 14.00 a | 14.04 a |
| Ionone | 1435 | 9.22 a | 9.94 a | 9.22 a | 10.82 a | 10.40 a | 10.41 a |
| Citronellol | 1228 | 6.51 a | 5.78 a | 4.44 a | 4.30 a | 4.40 a | 2.88 a |
| p-cymene | 1026 | 6.03 a | 5.48 ab | 5.37 ab | 4.50 bc | 4.69 bc | 4.26 c |
| Citral | 1273 | 3.10 c | 3.40 c | 4.02 bc | 4.72 ab | 3.31 c | 5.16 a |
| Ocimene | 1049 | 2.92 a | 3.04 a | 3.19 a | 3.14 a | 3.23 a | 3.11 a |
| Geranic acid | 1356 | 2.33 a | 2.26 a | 1.93 a | 2.46 a | 2.64 a | 2.26 a |
| (E)-geranic acid methyl ester | 1322 | 2.24 b | 2.22 b | 2.62 ab | 3.17 a | 2.87 ab | 2.75 ab |
| Geranyl isobutyrate | 1514 | 2.09 c | 2.08 c | 2.30 bc | 3.22 a | 2.99 ab | 3.46 a |
| D-limonene | 1031 | 1.71 b | 1.93 ab | 2.31 a | 2.16 ab | 2.19 ab | 2.14 ab |
| α-isomethyl ionone | 1480 | 1.21 c | 1.17 c | 1.70 bc | 2.17 ab | 1.85 abc | 2.50 a |
| Terpinen-4-ol | 1181 | 1.04 ab | 1.03 ab | 0.28 b | 1.53 a | 1.54 a | 1.16 ab |
| Limonene oxide | 1133 | 0.78 b | 1.11 ab | 1.19 ab | 1.11 ab | 1.22 a | 1.10 ab |
| (Z)-3,7-dimethyl -2,6-octadien-1-ol, acetate | 1365 | 0.26 a | 0.27 a | 0.34 a | 0.36 a | 0.38 a | 0.38 a |
| Total | 920.60 cd | 970.61 bcd | 914.01 d | 995.07 bc | 1042.00 b | 1159.99 a | |
![]() | |||||||
| Compounds | Odor Description | Threshold (μg/g) |
|---|---|---|
| Citral | Sharp, lemon, sweet | 0.1 |
| (+)-4-carene | - | - |
| (E)-geranic acid methyl ester | Flowery, green, fruity | - |
| D-limonene | Citrus | 0.034 |
| β-pinene | Dry, woody, resinous, pine, hay, green | 0.14 |
| p-cymene | Gasoline, citrus | 0.0114 |
| Geranic acid | Green | - |
| Geranyl isobutyrate | Sweet, floral, fruity, green, peach, apricot, rose | 0.013 |
| Neral | Sweet, citral, lemon, peel | 1 |
| β-cyclocitral | Tropical, saffron, herbal, clean, rose, sweet, tobacco, damascone, fruity | 0.003 |
| γ-terpinene | Oily, smoky | 2.1 |
| α-isomethyl ionone | Floral, fruity, powdery, violet, woody, tea | 0.01 |
| Citronellol | Floral, rose, lime | 0.04 |
| Linalool | Floral, green | 0.006 |
| (E)-linalool oxide (furanoid) | Flowery | 0.19 |
| Ionone | Sweet, woody, floral, violet, orris, tropical, fruity | 0.00378 |
| Ocimene | Sweet, herbal | 0.034 |
| Menthol | Minty | 0.9 |
| Limonene oxide | Fresh, citrus, minty, spearmint, herbal | 0.1 |
| (Z)-3,7-dimethyl -2,6-octadien-1-ol, acetate | Floral, rose, soapy, citrus, dewy, pear | 2 |
| 6,10-dimethyl -5,9-undecadien-2-one | Fresh, rose, leafy, floral, green, magnolia, aldehydic, fruity | - |
| Terpinen-4-ol | Turpentine | 1.2 |
| Compounds | SM | SM-Beta | SM-SO4 | SM-5C | SM-Fercal | SM-YN2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linalool | 109.60 | 118.12 | 108.02 | 118.95 | 125.70 | 144.63 |
| β-cyclocitral | 7.88 | 7.65 | 8.26 | 7.72 | 8.24 | 8.08 |
| Ionone | 2.44 | 2.63 | 2.44 | 2.86 | 2.75 | 2.75 |
| p-cymene | 0.53 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.37 |
| (E)-linalool oxide (furanoid) | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.51 |
| Citronellol | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.07 |
| Geranyl isobutyrate | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.25 | 0.23 | 0.27 |
| α-isomethyl ionone | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.25 |
| β-pinene | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Ocimene | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 |
| D-limonene | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Menthol | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Citral | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.05 |
| Neral | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Limonene oxide | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| γ-terpinene | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Lan, Z.; Wei, R.; Chen, H.; Liang, J.; Cheng, G.; Yu, Y.; Zheng, W.; Lu, J.-K.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, F.; et al. Effects of Rootstocks on the Physicochemical Properties and Volatile Profiles of ‘Shine Muscat’ Cv Grape Grown in Hot Regions of Southern China. Horticulturae 2026, 12, 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12070842
Lan Z, Wei R, Chen H, Liang J, Cheng G, Yu Y, Zheng W, Lu J-K, Zhang Z, Zhang F, et al. Effects of Rootstocks on the Physicochemical Properties and Volatile Profiles of ‘Shine Muscat’ Cv Grape Grown in Hot Regions of Southern China. Horticulturae. 2026; 12(7):842. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12070842
Chicago/Turabian StyleLan, Zhaofei, Rongfu Wei, Haiyan Chen, Jiemei Liang, Guo Cheng, Yingfen Yu, Wenrui Zheng, Jing-Ke Lu, Zihang Zhang, Fan Zhang, and et al. 2026. "Effects of Rootstocks on the Physicochemical Properties and Volatile Profiles of ‘Shine Muscat’ Cv Grape Grown in Hot Regions of Southern China" Horticulturae 12, no. 7: 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12070842
APA StyleLan, Z., Wei, R., Chen, H., Liang, J., Cheng, G., Yu, Y., Zheng, W., Lu, J.-K., Zhang, Z., Zhang, F., Pan, F., Liang, X., Liu, J.-B., & Zhou, S. (2026). Effects of Rootstocks on the Physicochemical Properties and Volatile Profiles of ‘Shine Muscat’ Cv Grape Grown in Hot Regions of Southern China. Horticulturae, 12(7), 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12070842


