Dual Benefits of Compost Tea Bacteria: Boosting ‘San Andreas’ Strawberries’ Productivity and Fruit Quality
Highlights
- Bacillus licheniformis and Pseudomonas mendocina from compost tea improved soil properties and strawberry performance.
- B. licheniformis increased individual fruit weight and enhanced several fruit quality traits.
- Both bacteria showed plant growth-promoting traits, including IAA production, phytase activity, and siderophore production.
- Compost tea bacteria represent promising bioinoculants for improving strawberry productivity and fruit nutritional quality.
- Their use may contribute to more sustainable horticultural systems with reduced reliance on synthetic fertilizers.
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Bacteria Isolation and Identification
2.2. Experimental Design in Strawberry Cultivar ‘San Andreas’
2.3. Analysis of Soil
2.4. Production and Quality Parameters of Strawberry Cultivar ‘San Andreas’
2.5. Mechanisms of Bacterial Action In Vitro
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Bacteria Isolation and Identification
3.2. Analysis of Soil
3.3. Vegetative Parameters of Strawberry Cultivar ‘San Andreas’
3.4. Productive Parameters of Strawberry Cultivar ‘San Andreas’
3.5. Mechanisms of Bacterial Action In Vitro
4. Discussion
4.1. Impact of Bacteria on Soil Chemical Properties
4.2. Impact of Bacteria on Productive Parameters
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Urra, J.; Alkorta, I.; Garbisu, C. Potential benefits and risks for soil health derived from the use of organic amendments in agriculture. Agronomy 2019, 9, 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doran, J.W.; Zeiss, M.R. Soil health and sustainability: Managing the biotic component of soil quality. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2000, 15, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirschenmann, F. Alternative agriculture in an energy-and resource-depleting future. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2010, 25, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pahalvi, H.N.; Rafiya, L.; Rashid, S.; Nisar, B.; Kamili, A.N. Chemical fertilizers and their impact on soil health. In Microbiota and Biofertilizers; Dar, G.H., Bhat, R.A., Mehmood, M.A., Hakeem, K.R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; Volume 2, pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agegnehu, G.; Srivastava, A.K.; Bird, M.I. The role of biochar and biochar-compost in improving soil quality and crop performance: A review. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 119, 156–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernández, T.; Chocano, C.; Moreno, J.L.; García, C. Use of compost as an alternative to conventional inorganic fertilizers in intensive lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) crops-Effects on soil and plant. Soil Tillage Res. 2016, 160, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-Montaño, F.; Aparicio, N.; Arenas, F.; Arjona, J.M.; Camacho, M.; Fernández-García, N.; Garcia-Fraile, P.; Goicochea, N.; Macias-Naranjo, S.; Matias, J.; et al. Emerging crops and plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB): A synergistic approach to climate-resilient agriculture. Microbiome 2025, 13, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, T.; Shahid, M.; Noman, M.; Hussain, S.; Khan, M.A.; Zubair, M.; Ismail, M.; Manzoor, N.; Shahzad, T.; Mahmood, F. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as biological tools for nutrient management and soil sustainability. In Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria for Agricultural Sustainability: From Theory to Practices; Kumar, A., Singh, M.V., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 95–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohanty, P.; Singh, P.K.; Chakraborty, D.; Mishra, S.; Pattnaik, R. Insight into the role of PGPR in sustainable agriculture and environment. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 667150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morales-Cedeño, L.R.; del Carmen Orozco-Mosqueda, M.; Loeza-Lara, P.D.; Parra-Cota, F.I.; de Los Santos-Villalobos, S.; Santoyo, G. Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes as biocontrol agents of pre-and post-harvest diseases: Fundamentals, methods of application and future perspectives. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 242, 126612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, J.; Wang, J.; Zhao, L.; Cui, Z.; Yao, S.; Li, G.; Yuan, J. Compost tea: Preparation, utilization mechanisms, and agricultural applications potential—A comprehensive review. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2025, 38, 104137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campana, E.; Ciriello, M.; Lentini, M.; Rouphael, Y.; De Pascale, S. Sustainable agriculture through compost tea: Production, application, and impact on horticultural crops. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adeleke, B.S.; Babalola, O.O. Roles of plant endosphere microbes in agriculture: A review. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 41, 1411–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kenneth, O.C.; Nwadibe, E.C.; Kalu, A.U.; Unah, U.V. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): A novel agent for sustainable food production. Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2019, 14, 35–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santoyo, G.; Orozco-Mosqueda, M.D.; Govindappa, M. Mechanisms of biocontrol and plant growth-promoting activity in soil bacterial species of Bacillus and Pseudomonas: A review. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2012, 22, 855–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (accessed on 5 December 2025).
- Ministerio de Economía de Argentina. Producción de frutilla en Argentina. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca. 2023. Available online: https://www.argentina.gob.ar/agricultura/subsecretaria-agricultura/informes-sectoriales-de-frutas (accessed on 25 November 2025).
- Ministerio de Economía de Argentina. Informe Síntesis: Economía Regional—Frutillas. Informe de la Secretaría de Bioeconomía del Ministerio de Economía de Argentina. 2024. Available online: https://alimentosargentinos.magyp.gob.ar/HomeAlimentos/ (accessed on 25 November 2025).
- Caminiti, A. Cultivo de Frutillas en la Provincia de Neuquén; Ediciones INTA: Bariloche, Argentina, 2015; pp. 4–7. Available online: https://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/handle/20.500.12123/2815 (accessed on 25 November 2025).
- Kim, M.; Oh, H.S.; Park, S.C.; Chun, J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chun, J.; Bae, K.S. Phylogenetic analysis of Bacillus subtilis and related taxa based on partial gyrA gene sequences. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 2000, 78, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mulet, M.; Bennasar, A.; Lalucat, J.; García-Valdés, E. An rpoD-based PCR procedure for the identification of Pseudomonas species and for their detection in environmental samples. Mol. Cell. Probes 2009, 23, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pernuzzi, C.; Sordo, M.H.; Travadelo, M.; Maina, M.; Acetta, P. Evaluación de la conveniencia de los macrotúneles en comparación con microtúneles para el cultivo de frutilla en Coronda. Rev. FAVE 2017, 16, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 30th ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Sigrid Vargas, S. Requerimientos de clima y suelo. In Manual de Manejo Agronómico de la Frutilla; Morales, C.G., Ed.; Boletín N° 17 INIA; Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias: Santiago, Chile, 2017; pp. 19–23. [Google Scholar]
- IRAM-SAGyP 29571-2; Calidad Ambiental—Calidad del Suelo. Determinación de Materia Orgánica en Suelos. Parte 2—Determinación de Carbono Orgánico Oxidable por Mezcla Sulfocrómica en Suelos. Instituto Argentino de Normalización y Certificación: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2016.
- IRAM-SGAyP 29572; Calidad Ambiental—Calidad del Suelo. Determinación de Nitrógeno en Suelo por el Método Kjeldahl Modificado. Instituto Argentino de Normalización y Certificación: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2019.
- Peters, J.; Sherri, M.; Hoskins, B.; Jarman, J.; Kovar, J.; Watson, M.; Wolf, A.; Wolf, N. Digestion and dissolution methods for P, K, Ca, K and trace elements. In Recommended Methods of Manure Analysis; University of Wisconsin: Madison, WI, USA, 2003; pp. 36–38. [Google Scholar]
- IRAM-SAGyP 29570-1; Calidad Ambiental—Calidad del Suelo. Determinación de Fósforo Extraíble en Suelos. Parte 1—Método Bray Kurtz 1 Modificado (Extracción Con Solución de Fluoruro de Amonio-Ácido Clorhídrico). Instituto Argentino de Normalización y Certificación: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2020.
- IRAM-SAGyP 29574; Calidad del Suelo. Determinación de pH en Suelo Para Uso Agropecuario. Instituto Argentino de Normalización y Certificación: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2021.
- Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Pesca y Alimentación de la Nación Argentina. Sistema de Apoyo Metodológico a los Laboratorios de Análisis de Suelos; SAMLA: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- IRAM-SAGyP 29577-1; Calidad del Suelo. Determinación de Cationes Básicos Intercambiables y Capacidad de Intercambio Catiónico. Parte 1—Extracción de Cationes Básicos Intercambiables Con Acetato de Amonio a pH 7 y su Cuantificación. Instituto Argentino de Normalización y Certificación: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2022.
- Demirsoy, H.; Demirsoy, L.; Öztürk, A. Improved model for the non-destructive estimation of strawberry leaf area. Fruits 2005, 60, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdel-Aal, E.S.; Hucl, P. A Rapid method for quantifying total anthocyanins in blue aleurone and purple pericarp wheats. Cereal Chem. 1999, 76, 350–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klein, B.P.; Perry, A.K. Ascorbic acid and vitamin A activity in selected vegetables from different geographical areas of the United States. J. Food Sci. 1982, 47, 941–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singleton, V.L.; Orthofer, R.; Lamuela-Raventos, R.M. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin Ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol. 1999, 299, 152–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, N.J.; Rice-Evans, C.; Davies, M.J.; Gopinathan, V.; Milner, A. A novel method for measuring antioxidant capacity and its application to monitoring the antioxidant status in premature neonates. Clin. Sci. 1993, 84, 407–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, Y.; Shi, J.; Chen, Y.; Lou, L.; Cui, X.; Cao, R.; Li, P.; Tang, J. Characterization of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria in sediments from a shallow eutrophic lake and a wetland: Isolation, molecular identification, and phosphorus release ability determination. Molecules 2010, 15, 8518–8533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kerovuo, J.; Lauraeus, M.; Nurminen, P.; Kalkkinen, N.; Apajalahti, J. Isolation, characterization, molecular gene cloning, and sequencing of a novel phytase from Bacillus subtilis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 2079–2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vero, S.; Garmendia, G.; González, M.B.; Bentancur, O.; Wisniewski, M. Evaluation of yeasts obtained from Antarctic soil samples as biocontrol agents for the management of postharvest diseases of apple (Malus × domestica). FEMS Yeast Res. 2013, 13, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karimi, K.; Amini, J.; Harighi, B.; Bahramnejad, B. Evaluation of biocontrol potential of Pseudomonas and Bacillus spp. against fusarium wilt of chickpea. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2012, 6, 695–703. Available online: https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.362736293688389 (accessed on 25 November 2025).
- Guardado-Fierros, B.G.; Tuesta-Popolizio, D.A.; Lorenzo-Santiago, M.A.; Rodriguez-Campos, J.; Contreras-Ramos, S.M. Comparative study between Salkowski reagent and chromatographic method for auxins quantification from bacterial production. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1378079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Wei, Q.; Zhao, Q.; Liu, X.; Deng, H.; Li, Z. Short-chain fatty acid producers in compost tea as affected by brewing time and aeration condition. J. Soils Sediments 2023, 23, 3096–3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehdizadeh, M.; Darbandi, E.I.; Naseri-Rad, H.; Tobeh, A. Growth and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) as influenced by different organic fertilizers. Int. J. Plant Prod. 2013, 4, 734–738. [Google Scholar]
- Cao, H.; Chen, Z.; Li, X.; Song, G.; Wu, Y.; Jin, J.; Cui, F.; Yuan, J.; Qi, H.; Wang, J.; et al. Optimization of fermentation conditions for Bacillus velezensis TCS001 and evaluation of its growth promotion and disease prevention effects on strawberries. Biol. Control 2024, 198, 105632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Chu, C.; Zhao, Z.; Wu, S.; Zhou, D. Pseudomonas fluorescens enriched by Bacillus velezensis containing agricultural waste promotes strawberry growth by microbial interaction in plant rhizosphere. Land Degrad. Dev. 2024, 35, 2476–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huasasquiche, L.; Alejandro, L.; Ccori, T.; Cántaro-Segura, H.; Samaniego, T.; Quispe, K.; Solórzano, R. Bacillus subtilis and Rhizophagus intraradices improve vegetative growth, yield, and fruit quality of Fragaria × ananassa var. San Andreas. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elikara, A.U.; Popescu, G.C.; Demirel, S.; Sümbül, A.; Yaman, M.; Demirel, F.; Say, A.; Güneş, A. Effect of rhizobacteria application on nutrient content, bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity, color properties, and fruit characteristics of strawberry cultivars. Processes 2024, 12, 2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nam, J.H.; Thibodeau, A.; Qian, Y.L.; Qian, M.C.; Park, S.H. Multidisciplinary evaluation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on soil microbiome and strawberry quality. AMB Express 2023, 13, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, L.; Li, X.; Li, T.; Xie, Y.; Cao, Z.; Fang, P. Bio-organic fertilizer with Bacillus subtilis F2 promotes strawberry plant growth and changes rhizosphere microbial community. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2022, 22, 3045–3055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Zhang, D.; Song, Z.; Ren, L.; Jin, X.; Fang, W.; Yan, D.; Li, Y.; Wang, Q.; Cao, A. Organic fertilizer activates soil beneficial microorganisms to promote strawberry growth and soil health after fumigation. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 295, 118653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Badar, M.A.; Mehmood, K.; Hassan, I.; Ahmed, M.; Ahmad, I.; Ahmad, N.; Hasan, M.U. Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) enhance growth and yield of strawberry cultivars. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2022, 20, 2187–2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mei, C.; Amaradasa, B.S.; Chretien, R.L.; Liu, D.; Snead, G.; Samtani, J.B.; Lowman, S. A potential application of endophytic bacteria in strawberry production. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morais, M.C.; Mucha, Â.; Ferreira, H.; Gonçalves, B.; Bacelar, E.; Marques, G. Comparative study of plant growth-promoting bacteria on the physiology, growth and fruit quality of strawberry. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 5341–5349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Esitken, A.; Yildiz, H.E.; Ercisli, S.; Donmez, M.F.; Turan, M.; Gunes, A. Effects of plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) on yield, growth, and nutrient contents of organically grown strawberry. Sci. Hortic. 2010, 124, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huasasquiche, L.; Ccori, T.; Alejandro, L.; Cántaro-Segura, H.; Samaniego, T.; Solórzano, R. Interaction between Trichoderma sp., Pseudomonas putida, and two organic amendments on the yield and quality of strawberries (Fragaria x annanasa cv. San Andreas) in the Huaral region, Peru. Appl. Microbiol. 2024, 4, 1110–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sangiorgio, D.; Cellini, A.; Spinelli, F.; Donati, I. Promoting strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) stress resistance, growth, and yield using native bacterial biostimulants. Agronomy 2023, 13, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seema, K.; Mehta, K.; Singh, N. Studies on the effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on growth, physiological parameters, yield, and fruit quality of strawberry cv. chandler. J. Pharmacog. Phytochem. 2018, 7, 383–387. [Google Scholar]
- Arunrat, N.; Sansupa, C.; Sereenonchai, S.; Hatano, R.; Lal, R. Fire-induced changes in soil properties and bacterial communities in rotational shifting cultivation fields in Northern Thailand. Biology 2024, 13, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, M.; Zhou, D.; Hang, H.; Chen, S.; Liu, H.; Su, J.; Lv, H.; Jia, H.; Zhao, G. Effects of balancing exchangeable cations Ca, Mg, and K on the growth of tomato seedlings (Solanum lycopersicum L.) based on increased soil cation exchange capacity. Agronomy 2024, 14, 629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mueller, B. Experimental interactions between clay minerals and bacteria: A review. Pedosphere 2015, 25, 799–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tariq, M.; Zahoor, M.; Yasmeen, T.; Naqqash, T.; Rashid, M.A.; Abdullah, M.; Rafiq, A.R.; Zafar, M.; Irfan, I.; Rasul, I. Biocontrol efficacy of Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens against rice pathogens. PeerJ 2025, 13, e18920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ni, S.; Wu, Y.; Zhu, N.; Leng, F.; Wang, Y. Bacillus licheniformis YB06: A Rhizosphere–Genome-Wide analysis and Plant Growth-Promoting Analysis of a Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacterium isolated from Codonopsis pilosula. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousuf, J.; Thajudeen, J.; Rahiman, M.; Krishnankutty, S.P.; Alikunj, A.; Abdulla, M.H. Nitrogen fixing potential of various heterotrophic Bacillus strains from a tropical estuary and adjacent coastal regions. J. Basic Microbiol. 2017, 57, 922–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.G.; Shi, W.Y.; Zhang, K.J.; Wang, P.; Wang, W.H.; Li, J.F. Simultaneous and efficient removal of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus by Pseudomonas mendocina MGAD-04 under aerobic conditions: Performance and mechanism. Bioresour. Technol. 2025, 439, 133369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shu, H.; Ma, Y.; Lu, H.; Sun, H.; Zhao, J.; Ruan, Z.; Zhou, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, F.; Xu, J.; et al. Simultaneous aerobic nitrogen and phosphate removal capability of novel salt-tolerant strain, Pseudomonas mendocina A4: Characterization, mechanism and application potential. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 393, 130047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, H.; Cheng, L.; Xia, L.; Deng, G.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, X. Rapid simultaneous removal of nitrogen and phosphorus by a novel isolated Pseudomonas mendocina SCZ-2. Environ. Res. 2023, 231, 116062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xie, F.; Thiri, M.; Wang, H. Simultaneous heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification by a novel isolated Pseudomonas mendocina X49. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 319, 124198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- He, X.; Sun, Q.; Xu, T.; Dai, M.; Wei, D. Removal of nitrogen by heterotrophic nitrification–aerobic denitrification of a novel halotolerant bacterium Pseudomonas mendocina TJPU04. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2019, 42, 853–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, M.; Ishaq, M.; Shah, W.A.; Adnan, M.; Fahad, S.; Saleem, M.H.; Khan, F.U.; Mussarat, M.; Khan, S.; Ali, B.; et al. Managing phosphorus availability from organic and inorganic sources for optimum wheat production in calcareous soils. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang, F.; Li, Q.; Solanki, M.K.; Wang, Z.; Xing, Y.X.; Dong, D.F. Soil phosphorus transformation and plant uptake driven by phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1383813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berza, B.; Sekar, J.; Vaiyapuri, P.; Pagano, M.C.; Assefa, F. Evaluation of inorganic phosphate solubilizing efficiency and multiple plant growth promoting properties of endophytic bacteria isolated from root nodules Erythrina brucei. BMC Microbiol. 2022, 22, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kour, D.O.; Rana, K.L.; Kaur, T.; Yadav, N.; Yadav, A.N.; Kumar, M.; Kumar, V.; Dhaliwal, H.S.; Saxena, A.K. Biodiversity, current developments and potential biotechnological applications of phosphorus-solubilizing and-mobilizing microbes: A review. Pedosphere 2021, 31, 43–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corrales Ramírez, L.C.; Arevalo Galvez, Z.Y.; Moreno Burbano, V.E. Solubilización de fosfatos: Una función microbiana importante en el desarrollo vegetal. Nova 2014, 12, 67–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naz, I.; Bano, A. Biochemical, molecular characterization and growth-promoting effects of phosphate-solubilizing Pseudomonas sp. isolated from weeds grown in salt range of Pakistan. Plant Soil 2010, 334, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Timofeeva, A.; Galyamova, M.; Sedykh, S. Prospects for using phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms as natural fertilizers in agriculture. Plants 2022, 11, 2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rawat, P.; Sharma, A.; Shankhdhar, D.; Shankhdhar, S.C. Comparative response of phosphate-solubilizing indigenous Bacillus licheniformis, Pantoea dispersa, and Staphylococcus sp. from rice rhizosphere for their multifarious growth-promoting characteristics. Geomicrobiol. J. 2022, 39, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahdi, I.; Fahsi, N.; Hafidi, M.; Allaoui, A.; Biskri, L. Plant growth enhancement using rhizospheric halotolerant phosphate-solubilizing bacterium Bacillus licheniformis QA1 and Enterobacter asburiae QF11 isolated from Chenopodium quinoa Willd. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, S.; Mathew, L.; Rishad, K. Isolation and molecular identification of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, Bacillus licheniformis UBPSB-07 capable of enhancing seed germination in Vigna radiata L. Phytomorphology 2018, 68, 13–18. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y.; Yin, P.; Zhou, J.; Ma, Y.; Lai, X.; Lin, J.; Peng, H.; Shu, H.; Huang, W. Removal of nitrogen and phosphorus by a novel salt-tolerant strain Pseudomonas sediminis D4. Water 2025, 17, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kohler, J.; Caravaca, F.; Carrasco, L.; Roldan, A. Contribution of Pseudomonas mendocina and Glomus intraradices to aggregate stabilization and promotion of biological fertility in rhizosphere soil of lettuce plants under field conditions. Soil Use Manag. 2006, 22, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rizwanuddin, S.; Kumar, V.; Singh, P.; Naik, B.; Mishra, S.; Chauhan, M.; Saris, P.E.; Verma, A.; Kumar, V. Insight into phytase-producing microorganisms for phytate solubilization and soil sustainability. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1127249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mussa, L.A.; Yadetie, D.M.; Temesgen, E.A.; Tefera, A.T.; Gemeda, M.T. Isolation and In-Vitro characterization of extracellular phytase-producing bacterial isolates for potential application in poultry feed. BMC Microbiol. 2023, 23, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Yang, X.; Li, J.; Li, M.; Li, C.; Yao, T. In-depth characterization of phytase-producing plant growth promotion bacteria isolated in alpine grassland of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1019383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bordé-Pavlicz, Á.; Zhumakayev, A.R.; Allaga, H.; Vörös, M.; Ramteke, P.W.; Monostori, T.; Vágvölgyi, C. Characterisation of the endophytic and rhizospheric Bacillus licheniformis strains isolated from sweet potato with plant growth-promoting and yield-enhancing potential. Adv. Agric. 2024, 2024, 4073275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiao, Y.; Leng, G.; Ran, M.; Wu, J.; Zhou, Y.; Li, J. Integrated genomic and functional analysis of a Pb-resistant Pseudomonas mendocina L1 for phytoremediation of contaminated soils. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2025, 41, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, S.; Kumar, S.; Verma, S.K. Arsenic resistance mechanisms in Pseudomonas mendocina SMSKVR-3 strain isolated from Khetri copper mines, Rajasthan, India. Curr. Microbiol. 2022, 79, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hersman, L.E.; Huang, A.; Maurice, P.A.; Forsythe, J.H. Siderophore production and iron reduction by Pseudomonas mendocina in response to iron deprivation. Geomicrobiol. J. 2000, 17, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Medison, R.G.; Jiang, J.; Medison, M.B.; Tan, L.T.; Kayange, C.D.; Sun, Z.; Zhou, Y. Evaluating the potential of Bacillus licheniformis YZCUO202005 isolated from lichens in maize growth promotion and biocontrol. Heliyon 2023, 9, e20204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Temirov, Y.V.; Esikova, T.Z.; Kashparov, I.A.; Balashova, T.A.; Vinokurov, L.M.; Alakhov, Y.B. A catecholic siderophore produced by the thermoresistant Bacillus licheniformis VK21 strain. Russ. J. Bioorganic Chem. 2003, 29, 542–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunes, P.S.; De Medeiros, F.H.; De Oliveira, T.S.; de Almeida Zago, J.R.; Bettiol, W. Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis promote tomato growth. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2023, 54, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muthuraja, R.; Muthukumar, T. Co-inoculation of halotolerant potassium solubilizing Bacillus licheniformis and Aspergillus violaceofuscus improves tomato growth and potassium uptake in different soil types under salinity. Chemosphere 2022, 294, 133718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- García, J.A.; Probanza, A.; Ramos, B.; Palomino, M.; Mañero, F.J. Effect of inoculation of Bacillus licheniformis on tomato and pepper. Agronomie 2004, 24, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhtar, S.S.; Amby, D.B.; Hegelund, J.N.; Fimognari, L.; Großkinsky, D.K.; Westergaard, J.C.; Müller, R.; Moelbak, L.; Liu, F.; Roitsch, T. Bacillus licheniformis FMCH001 increases water use efficiency via growth stimulation in both normal and drought conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goswami, D.; Dhandhukia, P.; Patel, P.; Thakker, J.N. Screening of PGPR from saline desert of Kutch: Growth promotion in Arachis hypogea by Bacillus licheniformis A2. Microbiol. Res. 2014, 169, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prashanth, S.; Mathivanan, N. Growth promotion of groundnut by IAA-producing rhizobacteria Bacillus licheniformis MML2501. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2010, 43, 191–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kohler, J.; Caravaca, F.; Roldán, A. An AM fungus and a PGPR intensify the adverse effects of salinity on the stability of rhizosphere soil aggregates of Lactuca sativa. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42, 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agami, R.A.; Medani, R.A.; Abd El-Mola, I.A.; Taha, R.S. Exogenous application with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) or proline induces stress tolerance in basil plants (Ocimum basilicum L.) exposed to water stress. Int. J. Environ. Agri. Res. 2016, 2, 78. [Google Scholar]
- Sadrnia, M.; Maksimava, N. A comparative study on the effects of wild form and transformant Pseudomonas mendocina with enhanced ACC deaminase production on seed germination and growth of tomato and wheat plants. Water Soil Sci. 2017, 26, 149–158. [Google Scholar]
- Doszhanov, Y.; Sabitov, A.; Mansurov, Z.; Kaiyrmanova, G. Bioremediation of oil-contaminated soils of the Zhanazhol deposit from West Kazakhstan by Pseudomonas mendocina H-3. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2024, 2024, 8510911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, S.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, R.; Lin, J.; Su, T.; Tong, H.; Wang, Z. Biodegradation of polybutylene adipate-co-terephthalate by Priestia megaterium, Pseudomonas mendocina, and Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes following incubation in the soil. Chemosphere 2022, 307, 135700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mir, Z.A.; Ali, S.; Tyagi, A.; Ali, A.; Bhat, J.A.; Jaiswal, P.; Qari, H.A.; Oves, M. Degradation and conversion of endosulfan by newly isolated Pseudomonas mendocina ZAM1 strain. 3 Biotech 2017, 7, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tu, Y.T.; Liu, J.K.; Lin, W.C.; Lin, J.L.; Kao, C.M. Enhanced anaerobic biodegradation of OCDD-contaminated soils by Pseudomonas mendocina NSYSU: Microcosm, pilot-scale, and gene studies. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 278, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, W.C.; Chang-Chien, G.P.; Kao, C.M.; Newman, L.; Wong, T.Y.; Liu, J.K. Biodegradation of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins by Pseudomonas mendocina Strain NSYSU. J. Environ. Qual. 2014, 43, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashem, A.; Tabassum, B.; Abd Allah, E.F. Bacillus subtilis: A plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium that also impacts biotic stress. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 26, 1291–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pappalettere, L.; Bartolini, S.; Toffanin, A. Auxin-producing bacteria used as microbial biostimulants improve the growth of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seedlings in hydroponic systems. BioTech 2024, 13, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, J.H.; Won, S.J.; Moon, J.H.; Lee, U.; Park, Y.S.; Maung, C.E.; Ajuna, H.B.; Ahn, Y.S. Bacillus licheniformis PR2 controls fungal diseases and increases production of jujube fruit under field conditions. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anuradha; Goyal, R.K.; Bishnoi, S.; Sindhu, S.S. Bio-inoculation of strawberry plants with Bacillus strains having promoting effect on growth, yield and quality. J. Appl. Hortic. 2022, 24, 278–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeliou, K.; Papasotiropoulos, V.; Manoussopoulos, Y.; Lamari, F.N. Physical and chemical quality characteristics and antioxidant properties of strawberry cultivars (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) in Greece: Assessment of their sensory impact. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 4065–4073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cocco, C.; Magnani, S.; Maltoni, M.L.; Quacquarelli, I.; Cacchi, M.; Antunes, L.E.; D’Antuono, L.F.; Faedi, W.; Baruzzi, G. Effects of site and genotype on strawberry fruit quality traits and bioactive compounds. J. Berry Res. 2015, 5, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carranza-Téllez, J.; Torres-Hernández, D.M.; Contreras-Martínez, C.S.; García-González, J.M.; Carranza-Concha, J. Influencia en la capacidad antioxidante de los fenoles totales, vitamina C y color en frutas. Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 2024, 47, 19–26. [Google Scholar]
- Cömert, E.D.; Mogol, B.A.; Gökmen, V. Relationship between color and antioxidant capacity of fruits and vegetables. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2020, 2, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villanueva-Tiburcio, J.E.; Condezo-Hoyos, L.A.; Asquieri, E.R. Antocianinas, ácido ascórbico, polifenoles totales y actividad antioxidante, en la cáscara de camu-camu (Myrciaria dubia (HBK) McVaugh). Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 30, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, G.; Nath, R.; Das Talukdar, A.; Ağagündüz, D.; Yilmaz, B.; Capasso, R.; Shin, H.; Patra, J.K. Major bioactive compounds from Java plum seeds: An investigation of its extraction procedures and clinical effects. Plants 2023, 12, 1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]








| Parameter | Technique |
|---|---|
| Weight (g) | Fruits were weighed using a digital scale. The fruits were classified into three categories: weight < 7 g (very small fruit), weight between 7 and 20 g, and weight > 20 g. |
| Color index (CI) | L*, a* and b* registered with digital colorimeter; CI = (a* × 1000)/(L* × b*) |
| Firmness (°Shore) | Firmness was measured using a digital penetrometer at two points in the equatorial zone. |
| Total Soluble Solids-TSS (°Brix) | TSS of fruit juice was determined using a digital refractometer. |
| Acidity (eq. citric acid/mL) | Fruit juice acid-base titration with NaOH 0.1 N; Acidity = mL NaOH consumed × NaOH normality × (citric acid molecular weight/citric acid number of equivalents) |
| Ratio | Relationship between TSS content and acidity |
| Anthocyanins in mg cyanidin-3-glucoside (mg C3G/g) | Direct measurement of the extract using a spectrophotometer at 540 nm [34] |
| Ascorbic acid in mg ascorbic acid (mg AA/g) | Reaction: 200 µL of extract + 250 µL of sodium acetate buffer (400 mM, pH 4) + 80 µL of 2,6-dichloroindophenol + 1470 µL of distilled water. Absorbance was measured at 515 nm [35] |
| Phenolic compounds in mg gallic acid (mg GA/g) | Reaction: 250 µL of extract + 1250 µL of distilled water + 100 µL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent + 200 µL of 7.5% Na2CO3 (water bath at 50 °C for 5 min). Absorbance was measured at 765 nm [36]. |
| Antioxidant activity (reduction in ABTS· radical in %) | Reaction: 250 µL of extract + 250 µL of radical ABTS· ± 0.7 Abs. Absorbance was measured at 734 nm [37]. |
| Gen | Sp. Identified by MALDI-TOF | BLAST Analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Identity (Id.) | E-Value | Sequence with the Highest ID in Genbank (Access) | ||
| GyrA | B1-Bacillus sp. | 100 | 0.0 | B. licheniformis culture SZMC:27712 DNA gyrase subunit alpha(gyrA) gene, partial cds (OP620082) |
| B2-B. cereus | 99.79 | 0.0 | ||
| rpoD | P1-P. mendocina | 96.00 | 0.0 | P. mendocina ATCC 25411partial rpoD gene for DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit D (AJ633567.1) |
| Parameter | Initial Soil | 2023 | 2024 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Con | FerC | BL | PM | Con | FerC | BL | PM | ||
| OM (g/kg) | 6.4 | 10.5 | 11.2 | 10.0 | 10.8 | 14.6 | 14.2 | 13.7 | 13.9 |
| Total N (g/kg) | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| Av. P (mg/kg) | 53.7 | 47.4 | 53.9 | 51.1 | 51.4 | 36.9 | 124.9 | 80.7 | 38.3 |
| Total P (mg/kg) | 157.5 | 242.5 | 204.5 | 179.9 | 220.5 | 448.3 | 402.9 | 439.2 | 461.9 |
| Total K (mg/kg) | 1149.0 | 938.0 | 854.0 | 974.0 | 961.0 | 927.9 | 867.9 | 907.9 | 992.9 |
| Total Na (mg/kg) | 1062.0 | 909.0 | 1132.1 | 1268.0 | 1171.0 | 793.8 | 918.5 | 1032.8 | 809.4 |
| pH | 6.1 | 7.3 | 6.1 | 6.9 | 6.8 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 7.0 |
| CE (dS/m) | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| CEC (cmolc/kg) | 6.1 | 4.4 | 4.9 | 5.0 | 5.1 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Ex. Ca2+ (mg/kg) | 400.8 | 258.0 | 433.4 | 270.0 | 279.0 | 400.8 | 440.9 | 416.8 | 440.9 |
| Ex. K+ (mg/kg) | 391.0 | 97.7 | 89.9 | 113.4 | 101.7 | 154.0 | 127.0 | 107.0 | 121.0 |
| Ex. Na+ (mg/kg) | 46.0 | 46.0 | 32.2 | 69.0 | 92.0 | 64.0 | 60.0 | 58.0 | 65.0 |
| Ex. Mg2+ (mg/kg) | 133.8 | 122.0 | 117.2 | 158.0 | 147.0 | 158.1 | 121.6 | 133.8 | 170.2 |
| Trial | Treatment | Fruit Categorization Based on Individual Weight (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <7 g | 7–15 g | >20 g | ||
| 2023 | Con | 17.5 | 74.6 | 7.90 |
| FerC | 18.6 | 61.4 | 21.4 | |
| BL | 10.0 | 62.5 | 30.0 | |
| PM | 16.7 | 61.1 | 25.0 | |
| 2024 | Con | 27.5 | 65.2 | 6.2 |
| FerC | 28.8 | 67.2 | 8.1 | |
| BL | 4.60 | 88.4 | 9.3 | |
| PM | 4.5 | 88.6 | 9.1 | |
| Trial | Treatment | Color Index | Firmness (°Shore) | Acidity (eq. Citric Acid/mL) | TSS (°Brix) | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Con | 53.9 ± 3.1 a | 44.0 ± 2.0 a | 9.9 ± 1.1 a | 6.8 ± 0.7 a | 0.7 ± 0.1 a |
| FerC | 65.8 ± 1.6 b | 45.5 ± 1.9 a | 11.8 ± 0.9 a | 6.2 ± 0.3 a | 0.5 ± 0.04 a | |
| BL | 65.7 ± 3.5 b | 46.1 ± 2.3 a | 10.5 ± 0.7 a | 5.6 ± 0.4 a | 0.5 ± 0.06 a | |
| PM | 57.0 ± 2.8 a | 42.0 ± 2.5 a | 13.7 ± 2.9 a | 6.2 ± 0.2 a | 0.5 ± 0.1 a | |
| 2024 | Con | 51.5 ± 1.7 a | 43.2 ± 1.3 a | 10.2 ± 0.7 a | 4.3 ± 0.2 a | 0.4 ± 0.01 a |
| FerC | 53.0 ± 2.1 a | 42.8 ± 1.7 a | 14.2 ± 1.1 a | 4.9 ± 0.3 a | 0.3 ± 0.03 a | |
| BL | 54.8 ± 3.0 a | 44.5 ± 2.1 a | 14.1 ± 1.9 a | 4.7 ± 1.9 a | 0.4 ± 0.04 a | |
| PM | 53.9 ± 2.9 a | 41.0 ± 2.4 a | 14.6 ± 1.8 a | 4.3 ± 0.4 a | 0.3 ± 0.03 a |
| Mechanism | B. licheniformis (BL) | P. mendocina (PM) |
|---|---|---|
| Phosphate solubilization | − | − |
| Phytase production | + | + |
| Siderophore production | + (low) | + |
| IAA production | + | + |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Seimandi, G.M.; Garmendia, G.; Nicolier, J.G.; Favaro, M.A.; Fernandez, L.N.; Ruiz, V.E.; Vero, S.; Derita, M.G. Dual Benefits of Compost Tea Bacteria: Boosting ‘San Andreas’ Strawberries’ Productivity and Fruit Quality. Horticulturae 2026, 12, 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12020252
Seimandi GM, Garmendia G, Nicolier JG, Favaro MA, Fernandez LN, Ruiz VE, Vero S, Derita MG. Dual Benefits of Compost Tea Bacteria: Boosting ‘San Andreas’ Strawberries’ Productivity and Fruit Quality. Horticulturae. 2026; 12(2):252. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12020252
Chicago/Turabian StyleSeimandi, Gisela M., Gabriela Garmendia, Juan G. Nicolier, María A. Favaro, Laura N. Fernandez, Verónica E. Ruiz, Silvana Vero, and Marcos G. Derita. 2026. "Dual Benefits of Compost Tea Bacteria: Boosting ‘San Andreas’ Strawberries’ Productivity and Fruit Quality" Horticulturae 12, no. 2: 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12020252
APA StyleSeimandi, G. M., Garmendia, G., Nicolier, J. G., Favaro, M. A., Fernandez, L. N., Ruiz, V. E., Vero, S., & Derita, M. G. (2026). Dual Benefits of Compost Tea Bacteria: Boosting ‘San Andreas’ Strawberries’ Productivity and Fruit Quality. Horticulturae, 12(2), 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12020252

