Potassium Stress Induces Compensatory Root Adaptive Responses in Trifoliate Orange Through Reconfigured Auxin Signaling
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Materials
2.2. Experimental Design
2.3. Measurement Method
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Response of Trifoliate Orange Seedling Growth to Different K+ Concentrations
3.2. Response of Root Architecture of Trifoliate Orange Seedlings to Different K+ Concentrations
3.3. Response of Root Hair Phenotypes of Trifoliate Orange Seedlings to Different K+ Concentrations
3.4. Response of Endogenous Hormones in the Root of Trifoliate Orange Seedlings to Different K+ Concentrations
3.5. Response of Expansion Protein Gene Expression Levels in the Root System of Trifoliate Orange Seedlings to Different K+ Concentrations
3.6. Response of IAA Synthesized Gene Expression in the Root System of Trifoliate Orange Seedlings to Different K+ Concentrations
3.7. Response of IAA Transport Carrier Protein Gene Expression in the Root System of Trifoliate Orange Seedlings to Different K+ Concentrations
3.8. Comprehensive Evaluation of Root System Architecture of Trifoliate Orange Seedlings Under Different K+ Concentrations
3.9. Comprehensive Evaluation of Root Hair Phenotypes of Trifoliate Orange Seedlings Under Different K+ Concentrations
3.10. Correlation Analysis of Root Architecture and Root Hair Phenotypes with Endogenous Hormone Content in the Root of Trifoliate Orange Seedlings
3.11. Correlation Analysis of IAA Content, Root Architecture, and Root Hair Phenotype with the Expression Levels of Related Genes in the Root of Trifoliate Orange Seedlings
4. Discussion
4.1. Potassium Homeostasis and Growth Performance of Trifoliate Orange Seedlings
4.2. Differential Regulation of Root Architecture and Root Hair Development Under K+ Stress
4.2.1. Root Architectural Responses to K+ Availability
4.2.2. Root Hair Development as an Adaptive Strategy
4.3. Hormonal Integration of K+ Signaling and Root Development
4.3.1. Auxin as a Central Mediator of K+ Effects on Root Development
4.3.2. Multifaceted Roles of Other Plant Hormones
4.4. Molecular Architecture of K+-Responsive Root Development
4.4.1. Expansin Gene Expression Underpins Root Hair Development
4.4.2. Auxin Biosynthesis Pathway Reconfiguration Under K+ Stress
4.4.3. Auxin Transport Dynamics Underline Root Developmental Plasticity
4.5. Integrated Model of K+-Responsive Root Development
4.6. Agronomic Implications and Future Directions
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hodge, A.; Berta, G.; Doussan, C.; Merchan, F.; Crespi, M. Plant root growth, architecture and function. Plant Soil 2009, 321, 153–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yetgin, A. Exploring the dynamic nature of root plasticity and morphology in the face of changing environments. Ecol. Front. 2024, 44, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, R.; Vishwakarma, K.; Hossen, M.S.; Kumar, V.; Shackira, A.M.; Puthur, J.T.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Potassium in plants: Growth regulation, signaling, and environmental stress tolerance. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 172, 56–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Imtiaz, H.; Mir, A.R.; Corpas, F.J.; Hayat, S. Impact of potassium starvation on the uptake, transportation, photosynthesis, and abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 99, 429–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sustr, M.; Soukup, A.; Tylova, E. Potassium in root growth and development. Plants 2019, 8, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, Y.B.; Yang, X.E.; Feng, Y.; Jilani, G. Differential response of root morphology to potassium deficient stress among rice genotypes varying in potassium efficiency. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2008, 9, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zörb, C.; Senbayram, M.; Peiter, E. Potassium in agriculture–status and perspectives. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 171, 656–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kellermeier, F.; Chardon, F.; Amtmann, A. Natural variation of arabidopsis root architecture reveals complementing adaptive strategies to potassium starvation. Plant Physiol. 2013, 161, 1421–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gou, J.; Strauss, S.H.; Tsai, C.J.; Fang, K.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, X.; Busov, V.B. Gibberellins regulate lateral root formation in populus through interactions with auxin and other hormones. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 623–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javed, S.; Chai, X.Z.; Wang, X.M.; Xu, S.B. The phytohormones underlying the plant lateral root development in fluctuated soil environments. Plant Soil 2024, 505, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hewedy, O.A.; Elsheery, N.I.; Karkour, A.M.; Elhamouly, N.; Arafa, R.A.; Mahmoud, G.A.E.; Brestic, M. Jasmonic acid regulates plant development and orchestrates stress response during tough times. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2023, 208, 105260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.T.; Huang, K.L.; Zhang, M.H.; Bu, W.X.; Yang, X.Y.; Tian, J.N.; Lei, W.Q. Study on adventitious root induction and endogenous hormone dynamics during cutting propagation of Distylium chinense. Plant Sci. 2025, 355, 112430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, P.; Di, D.W. Precise regulation of the TAA1/TAR-YUCCA auxin biosynthesis pathway in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, X.N.; Lu, W.; Liu, C.Y.; Wu, Q.S. Regulation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in citrus root hairs mediated by auxin efflux carrier protein PtPINs. Sci. Hortic. 2024, 337, 113574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, W.J.; Liu, S.J.; Meng, L.; Xue, R.; Wang, C.D.; Liu, G.L.; Dong, C.X.; Wang, S.S.; Dong, J.X.; Zhang, Y.L. Potassium deficiency inhibits lateral root development in tobacco seedlings by changing auxin distribution. Plant Soil 2015, 396, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.Y.; Wang, Q.L.; Li, Z.H.; Duan, L.S.; Tian, X.L. Effects of potassium deficiency on root growth of cotton seedlings and its physiological mechanisms. Acta Agron. Sin. 2009, 35, 718–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gierth, M.; Mäser, P.; Schroeder, J.I. The potassium transporter AtHAK5 functions in K+ deprivation-induced high-affinity K+ uptake and AKT1 K+ channel contribution to K+ uptake kinetics in arabidopsis roots. Plant Physiol. 2005, 137, 1105–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, S.; Zhang, M.L.; Ma, T.L.; Wang, Y. Phosphorylation of ARF2 relieves its repression of transcription of the K+ transporter gene HAK5 in response to low potassium stress. Plant Cell 2016, 28, 3005–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, T.Y.; Feng, H.M.; Zhang, S.; Xiao, H.J.; Hu, Q.D.; Chen, G.; Xuan, W.; Moran, N.; Murphy, A.; Yu, L.; et al. The potassium transporter OsHAK5 alters rice architecture via ATP-dependent transmembrane auxin fluxes. Plant Commun. 2020, 1, 100052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, X.; Xia, R.X.; Yang, H.Y.; Zhan, D.J.; Zhao, Y. Effects of P, K and Ca deficiency on the root morphology and nutrient absorption of Poncirus trifoliata seedlings. J. Plant Nutr. Fert. 2014, 20, 981–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, S.S.; Miao, D.P.; Cui, H.Y.; Li, S.H.; Gu, Y.N.; Jia, R.R.; Leng, Y.F. Physiology and transcriptomic analysis of endogenous hormones regulating in vitro adventitious root formation in tree peony. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 318, 112122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, Y.X.; Ye, M.; Xiong, J.; Sheng, H.L.; Huang, W.H.; Zhang, L.P.; Wu, F. Effects of AM fungi on growth, root system structure and photosynthetic characteristics of camellia oleifera at different nitrogen levels. Non-Wood For. Res. 2022, 40, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Gao, J.P.; Zhao, Y.Z.; Fu, Y.C.; Yan, B.C.; Wan, X.; Cheng, G.Q.; Zhang, W.Z. Effects of different phosphorus and potassium supply on the root architecture, phosphorus and potassium uptake, and utilization efficiency of hydroponic rice. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 21178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gao, Z.Y.; Ye, T.H.; Cui, X.; Lu, J.W.; Ren, T.; Cong, R.H.; Lu, Z.F.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Liao, S.P.; Li, X. Dynamics of potassium concentration in paddy field water, soil and plant affected by potassium fertilizer levels. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 2025, 130, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wedegaertner, K.; Shekoofa, A.; Purdom, S.; Walters, K.; Duncan, L.; Raper, T.B. Cotton stomatal closure under varying temperature and vapor pressure deficit, correlation with the hydraulic conductance trait. J. Cotton Res. 2022, 5, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, Q.; Zhao, X.H.; Xia, L.; Jiang, C.J.; Wang, X.G.; Han, Y.; Wang, J.; Yu, H.Q. Effects of potassium deficiency on photosynthesis, chloroplast ultrastructure, ROS, and antioxidant activities in maize (Zea mays L.). J. Integr. Agric. 2019, 18, 395–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mostofa, M.G.; Rahman, M.M.; Ghosh, T.K.; Kabir, A.H.; Abdelrahman, M.; Khan, M.A.R.; Mochida, K.; Tran, L.P. Potassium in plant physiological adaptation to abiotic stresses. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2022, 186, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balemi, T.; Negisho, K. Management of soil phosphorus and plant adaptation mechanisms to phosphorus stress for sustainable crop production: A review. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2012, 12, 547–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nadeem, M.; Yahya, M.; Tong, J.; Shah, L.; Khan, S.U.; Ali, A.; Waheed, A. Improving nitrogen acquisition and utilization through root architecture remodelling: Insight from legumes. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 5295–5310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, W.J.; Xue, R.; Song, Y.; Bi, Y.; Liang, Z.H.; Meng, L.; Dong, C.X.; Wang, C.D.; Liu, G.L.; Dong, J.X.; et al. Differential response of first-order lateral root elongation to low potassium involves nitric oxide in two tobacco cultivars. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2018, 37, 114–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keyes, S.D.; Daly, K.R.; Gostling, N.J.; Jones, D.L.; Talboys, P.; Pinzer, B.R.; Boardman, R.; Sinclair, I.; Marchant, A.; Roose, T. High resolution synchrotron imaging of wheat root hairs growing in soil and image based modelling of phosphate uptake. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 1023–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kohli, P.S.; Maurya, K.; Thakur, J.K.; Bhosale, R.; Giri, J. Significance of root hairs in developing stress-resilient plants for sustainable crop production. Plant Cell Environ. 2022, 45, 677–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jonathan, P.L. Steep, cheap and deep: An ideotype to optimize water and N acquisition by maize root systems. Ann. Bot-London. 2013, 112, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nie, S.; Huang, S.H.; Wang, S.F.; Cheng, D.D.; Liu, J.W.; Lv, S.; Wang, X.F. Enhancing brassinosteroid signaling via overexpression of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) SlBRI1 improves major agronomic traits. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.Z.; Cao, J.B.; Lin, N.; Li, J.M.; Wang, Y.Z.; Liu, W.B.; Yao, W.; Li, Y. Origin, evolution, and diversification of the expansin family in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 11814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.; Ganguly, A.; Lee, R.D.; Park, M.; Cho, H.T. Intracellularly localized PIN-FORMED8 promotes lateral root emergence in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 10, 1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]











| Gene | Accession No. | Forward Primer (5′-3′) | Reverse Primer (5′-3′) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PtABCB1 | Ciclev10010916m | GAGCCATTCACGCCACTTC | TCTTGTAACCGAGCCTTTGAGC |
| PtABCB19 | Ciclev10010931m | GCATGAGTTTGGGTCAGTCTTT | CATCTTCCATTTGTTGGGTCTT |
| PtAUX1 | Ciclev10011596m | CTTGACTCTGCCCTATTCATTCTC | TGGACCCAGTAACCCATCAAGC |
| PtEXPA4 | Cs7g32410.1 | GACCGCCGTACTTCCACTTCTTG | GGAAAGTGCTTGAAACTAAACCCTGAA |
| PtEXPA5 | Cs8g18640.1 | AACTAACTACACGGAGCTGTGTCTTCT | CGGAGTAATCGCCAGGGAGTCTTG |
| PtEXPA7 | Cs5g10000.1 | AGGGAACAAGAACAGGATGGATTAGCA | CCAGTTAGCAGGAGCAACATTGTAAGC |
| PtLAX1 | Ciclev10031413m | TTGGCGGACATGCAGTGAC | CAGCGGCAGCAGAAGGAAT |
| PtLAX2 | Ciclev10028271m | TGTGGGAAGATGGGTAGGGAC | TAGTVATGCTCGCCCACCC |
| PtLAX3 | Ciclev10001072m | ATCACTTTCGCTCCTGCTGC | CAAACCCAAATCCCACCACTA |
| PtPIN1 | Ciclev10007787m | GCTTTGGCAACAGAAGAGGATT | ATTACACTTGTCGGCGGCATA |
| PtPIN3 | Orange1.1g006199m | CATGCCTCCAGCGAGTGTTAT | TGCCACCTGAAAGCGATTAGA |
| PtPIN4 | Ciclev10012938m | ATGGGGTTGAAAACGAAGGG | CCTGATAAGTTTCCTCCACACCA |
| PtTAA1 | Ciclev10033774m | TTTGAGGCGTTTTGGAGGAA | TTGTTGATTGCTTCAGCGAGTT |
| PtTAR2 | Ciclev10020085m | CACACACGGCACACCCCTA | GCCTCCCACTCCCCAGATC |
| PtYUC3 | Ciclev10006828m | CCTTCAGGTTTAGCCGTTGC | GGAAGTTTGGAAGTTGGCAGA |
| PtYUC4 | Ciclev10008466m | GACCATCTGGGTTAGCCGTTT | GTATTTTGGGAAGTTTTCAGGGA |
| PtYUC6 | Ciclev10008473m | GTGGTTGCTAAAGTGGCTGC | GTTGAAGGGGACCCAAAAGA |
| PtYUC8 | Ciclev10020503m | GTGATAATGGTAGGGGCAGGA | GAATGGCAGGTGAGGGAGC |
| β-actin | Cs1g05000 | CCGACCGTATGAGCAAGGAAA | TTCCTGTGGACAATGGATGGA |
| K Concentration | Plant Height (cm) | Stem Diameter (mm) | Leaf Numbers (#/plant) | Dry Biomass (g FW/Plant) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf | Shoot | Root | ||||
| K0 | 19.73 ± 1.88 c | 0.30 ± 0.01 c | 25.38 ± 1.92 b | 0.16 ± 0.01 d | 0.41 ± 0.03 c | 0.12 ± 0.01 b |
| K2 | 25.40 ± 2.26 a | 0.34 ± 0.02 b | 27.13 ± 2.23 ab | 0.19 ± 0.02 c | 0.44 ± 0.04 c | 0.13 ± 0.01 b |
| K6 | 27.43 ± 0.87 a | 0.39 ± 0.02 a | 28.25 ± 2.76 a | 0.23 ± 0.01 a | 0.63 ± 0.06 a | 0.15 ± 0.02 a |
| K12 | 26.00 ± 2.16 a | 0.34 ± 0.02 b | 27.63 ± 2.33 ab | 0.21 ± 0.02 b | 0.51 ± 0.05 b | 0.14 ± 0.01 a |
| K Concentration | Total Length (cm) | Projected Area (cm2) | Surface Rea (cm2) | Average Diameter (mm) | Volume (cm3) | Tap-Root Length (cm) | Lateral Root Numbers (#/plant) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st-Order | 2nd-Order | 3rd-Order | |||||||
| K0 | 165.72 ± 15.03 c | 12.24 ± 0.99 a | 13.41 ± 0.76 c | 0.79 ± 0.03 c | 0.55 ± 0.03 b | 13.93 ± 0.80 a | 39.63 ± 3.74 b | 97.13 ± 7.81 c | 26.63 ± 2.56 c |
| K2 | 188.49 ± 17.97 b | 12.59 ± 0.89 a | 15.00 ± 1.25 b | 0.86 ± 0.02 b | 0.55 ± 0.03 b | 13.86 ± 1.15 a | 45.63 ± 2.32 a | 109.38 ± 9.36 b | 33.75 ± 2.82 b |
| K6 | 210.74 ± 15.72 a | 13.11 ± 0.57 a | 16.06 ± 0.60 a | 1.14 ± 0.11 a | 0.60 ± 0.04 ab | 13.89 ± 1.34 a | 41.63 ± 1.41 b | 123.38 ± 9.05 a | 43.88 ± 3.23 a |
| K12 | 206.47 ± 13.20 a | 12.80 ± 0.48 a | 16.12 ± 1.14 a | 1.01 ± 0.06 a | 0.61 ± 0.02 a | 14.84 ± 0.99 a | 40.88 ± 2.10 b | 110.50 ± 7.60 b | 24.13 ± 2.47 c |
| Index | Load of Each Principal Component | Index | Load of Each Principal Component | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | ||
| Total length | 0.444 | −0.074 | 0.032 | 1st-order lateral roots | 0.116 | 0.246 | 0.808 |
| Projected area | 0.325 | 0.022 | 0.399 | 2nd-order lateral roots | 0.373 | 0.256 | −0.221 |
| Surface area | 0.418 | −0.162 | −0.053 | 3rd-order lateral roots | 0.259 | 0.607 | −0.084 |
| Volume | 0.394 | 0.093 | −0.326 | Eigenvalues | 4.626 | 1.588 | 1.092 |
| Average diameter | 0.329 | −0.32 | −0.036 | Variance contribution rate (%) | 51.398 | 17.647 | 12.129 |
| Tap-root length | 0.198 | −0.602 | 0.145 | Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 51.398 | 69.045 | 81.174 |
| K Level | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | Comprehensive Score | Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K0 | −1.360 | −0.061 | −0.026 | −1.447 | 4 |
| K2 | −0.248 | 0.136 | 0.142 | 0.030 | 3 |
| K6 | 1.129 | 0.206 | −0.089 | 1.246 | 1 |
| K12 | 0.478 | −0.281 | −0.027 | 0.170 | 2 |
| Index | Load of Each Principal Component | Index | Load of Each Principal Component | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC1 | PC2 | PC1 | PC2 | ||
| Density | 0.619 | 0.527 | Eigenvalues | 1.407 | 1.299 |
| Length | −0.179 | 0.817 | Variance contribution rate (%) | 46.884 | 43.292 |
| Diameter | 0.764 | −0.235 | Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 46.884 | 90.176 |
| K Level | PC1 | PC2 | Comprehensive Score | Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K0 | −0.271 | 0.655 | 0.384 | 2 |
| K2 | 0.000 | −0.656 | −0.656 | 3 |
| K6 | −0.564 | −0.119 | −0.683 | 4 |
| K12 | 0.835 | 0.119 | 0.954 | 1 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Liu, C.-Y.; Peng, Y.-Y.; Deng, X.; Hao, Y. Potassium Stress Induces Compensatory Root Adaptive Responses in Trifoliate Orange Through Reconfigured Auxin Signaling. Horticulturae 2026, 12, 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12020237
Liu C-Y, Peng Y-Y, Deng X, Hao Y. Potassium Stress Induces Compensatory Root Adaptive Responses in Trifoliate Orange Through Reconfigured Auxin Signaling. Horticulturae. 2026; 12(2):237. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12020237
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Chun-Yan, Yi-Yuan Peng, Xinmin Deng, and Yong Hao. 2026. "Potassium Stress Induces Compensatory Root Adaptive Responses in Trifoliate Orange Through Reconfigured Auxin Signaling" Horticulturae 12, no. 2: 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12020237
APA StyleLiu, C.-Y., Peng, Y.-Y., Deng, X., & Hao, Y. (2026). Potassium Stress Induces Compensatory Root Adaptive Responses in Trifoliate Orange Through Reconfigured Auxin Signaling. Horticulturae, 12(2), 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12020237

