Next Article in Journal
A Study of Observed Climate Change Effects on Grapevine Suitability in Oltenia (Romania)
Previous Article in Journal
Interactive Effects of Rootstock and Training System on Photosynthesis, Biochemical Responses, and Yield in Vitis labrusca Under Subtropical Climate Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Flooding Tolerance and Recovery Capacity of Carya illinoinensis

1
Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China of Jiangsu Province, Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Restoration of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2
Wuxi Branch, Bureau of Investigation on Hydrologic Water Resources, Wuxi 214000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2025, 11(6), 590; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11060590 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 27 February 2025 / Revised: 20 May 2025 / Accepted: 22 May 2025 / Published: 26 May 2025

Abstract

Carya illinoinensis is a relatively water-tolerant species widely planted in areas with high flood risk. Evaluating its adaptation strategies and tolerance thresholds is crucial for ecological restoration in the context of climate change. In this study, five treatments were applied to 1-year-old C. illinoinensis seedlings in a potting simulation experiment: T1 (field capacity: 75%), T2 (5 cm below the root collar), T3 (up to the root collar), T4 (10 cm above the root collar), and T5 (30 cm above the root collar). The flooding episode lasted for 4 months and was followed by a recovery period of 6 months. The results show that, at the end of flooding, total biomass (TB), stem-mass ratio (SMR), malondialdehyde (MDA), soluble protein (SP), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT) were significantly increased in all the flooded groups (T2–T5) compared to the control (T1), while the root-to-shoot ratio (RSR), root-to-mass ratio (RMR), leaf-to-mass ratio (LMR), and leaf-mass fraction (LMF) were significantly decreased. Although survival in the high stress group (T5) temporarily decreased to 83.3% (T1–T4 remained 100%), survival in all treatment groups fully recovered (100%) after recovery. Significant decreases (p < 0.001) were observed when comparing post-recovery to end-flooding levels within each flooded group (T2–T5), with reductions ranging: LMR (21.0–30.8%), REL (14.0–26.7%), MDA (16.1–25.3%), SP (42.2–67.3%), SOD (27.6–49.8%), and CAT (47.0–61.3%) across treatments. At this time, T5 showed lower TB and higher MDA, soluble sugars (SS), and SP compared to T1. PCA analysis indicated that the damage ranked as T5 > T4 > T3 > T2 > T1 at the end of flooding, and as T5 > T1 > T4 > T3 > T2 at the end of recovery. Therefore, it could be concluded that 1-year-old C. illinoinensis exhibits high flooding tolerance, with self-recovery thresholds below the T5 treatment, making it suitable for ecological restoration in flood-prone areas.
Keywords: Carya illinoinensis; flooding; recovery; growth; physiology Carya illinoinensis; flooding; recovery; growth; physiology

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, X.; Hu, H.; Wu, C.; Zhu, L. Flooding Tolerance and Recovery Capacity of Carya illinoinensis. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11060590

AMA Style

Chen X, Hu H, Wu C, Zhu L. Flooding Tolerance and Recovery Capacity of Carya illinoinensis. Horticulturae. 2025; 11(6):590. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11060590

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Xue, Haibo Hu, Chaoming Wu, and Li Zhu. 2025. "Flooding Tolerance and Recovery Capacity of Carya illinoinensis" Horticulturae 11, no. 6: 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11060590

APA Style

Chen, X., Hu, H., Wu, C., & Zhu, L. (2025). Flooding Tolerance and Recovery Capacity of Carya illinoinensis. Horticulturae, 11(6), 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11060590

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop