Next Article in Journal
Glutathione Reductase Affects Hyphal Growth and Fruiting Body Development by Regulating Intracellular ROS Levels in Hypsizygus marmoreus
Previous Article in Journal
Breeding for Disease Resistance in Cucumber: Current Status, Genetic Insights, and Genomic Resources
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Stem Polyphenol Content as a Potential Marker for Selecting Foot-Rot-Resistant Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) Hybrids

1
Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Agriculture and Engineering, University of Miyazaki, 1-1 Gakuenkibanadainishi, Miyazaki-shi 889-2192, Miyazaki, Japan
2
Kushima AoiFarm Co., Ltd., 6564-12, Naru, Kushima-shi 889-3531, Miyazaki, Japan
3
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Miyazaki, 1-1 Gakuenkibanadainishi, Miyazaki-shi 889-2192, Miyazaki, Japan
4
Research Institute for Bioresources and Biotechnology, Ishikawa Prefectural University, Nonoichi-shi 921-8836, Ishikawa, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2025, 11(12), 1439; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11121439
Submission received: 22 October 2025 / Revised: 20 November 2025 / Accepted: 26 November 2025 / Published: 28 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Genetics, Genomics, Breeding, and Biotechnology (G2B2))

Abstract

Foot rot, a disease caused by the fungal plant pathogen Diaporthe destruens, has been a major problem throughout East Asia. In major sweet-potato-producing regions, developing sweet potato cultivars that are resistant to foot rot has become an urgent priority. The possibility of selecting resistant cultivars by using polyphenols in the stems as markers was recently suggested, but this selection method has not been tested in the crossbreeding of sweet potato cultivars. In this study, we crossed the sweet potato cultivars ‘Konaishin’ and ‘Tamaakane’ (each of which is resistant to foot rot), analyzed the polyphenols in the stems of the resulting hybrid lines, and evaluated the possibility of selecting resistant lines. As a result, KT No. 7 and KT No. 8 showed similar or lower total polyphenol contents (145.9 and 112.9 mg GAE 100 g−1 FW, respectively) compared to ‘Tamaakane’ (142.2 mg GAE 100 g−1 FW). The selected line, KT No. 7, exhibited the highest resistance among the hybrids when it was directly inoculated with the foot rot pathogen using stems as test material, showing a disease severity value of 1.8, which was substantially lower than that of ‘Tamaakane’ (50.0). These results suggest that stem polyphenol content has potential as a marker for identifying promising candidates with foot rot resistance, although its predictive value may vary depending on genetic and environmental factors. This approach may help improve the efficiency of foot rot resistance screening in sweet potato breeding programs.

1. Introduction

Sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] is a resilient and economically important crop that has attracted worldwide attention due to its high production. Most of the world’s sweet potato cultivation is concentrated in Asia and Africa, as these two continents account for 95% of the global production. Asia is the top sweet-potato-producing continent, followed by Africa, the Americas, Oceania, and Europe [1]. Due to its high adaptability to a variety of environments, sweet potato is grown in a wide range of geographic regions, including mountainous areas where it is exposed to a variety of biotic and abiotic stresses provided by the harsh soil conditions [2]. Recent climate change developments have also increased threats to global crop production, including that of sweet potato. Such environmental variability can influence the incidence, severity, and geographic range of plant diseases [3].
The cultivation of sweet potato has been greatly affected by foot rot disease, which is caused by the fungal plant pathogen Diaporthe destruens (also known as Plenodomus destruens). Foot rot of sweet potato caused by Diaporthe destruens was first described in the United States in 1912 [4]. In Japan, occurrence of this disease was first reported in Okinawa Prefecture in 2018 [5]. Before its identification, foot rot disease had already been reported repeatedly in East Asian countries and subsequently spread throughout Japan [6]. The situation has become extremely serious in Okinawa, Kagoshima, and Miyazaki prefectures, Japan, where the disease has hindered the supply of raw materials for confectioneries, sweet potato shochu (a Japanese distilled liquor), starch, and products for fresh consumption [5,7]. Therefore, sweet potato cultivars that are resistant to foot rot are urgently needed, as is the agronomic control against foot rot. At present, a high-quality draft genome of Diaporthe destruens is available, providing a useful genomic resource [8]. However, no sweet potato cultivars with complete resistance to foot rot have been selected, and the genes that are involved in such resistance have also not been identified.
Setoguchi et al. [9] established a fundamental technique for selecting sweet potato cultivars resistant to foot rot by analyzing polyphenols in disease-free healthy stems. Cultivars with lower stem polyphenol content were less susceptible to foot rot, while cultivars with higher stem polyphenol content were more susceptible to foot rot. In particular, they found strong correlations with several polyphenols, including 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic acid and chlorogenic acid. They proposed the use of stem polyphenols as a marker for selecting sweet potato cultivars resistant to foot rot. In general, polyphenols, mainly phenylpropanoids and flavonoids, are widely recognized to contribute to plant disease resistance. Among them, chlorogenic acid has been highlighted as a key component of plant defense [10,11]. In plant defense against pathogens, these compounds may act indirectly as signaling molecules or be directly mediated through the toxic effects of phytoanticipins (active compounds constitutively stored in plant tissues) and phytoalexins (active compounds newly synthesized upon pathogen detection) [12,13].
However, metabolites, including polyphenols, are known to be strongly affected by environmental factors, such as temperature, light, and water availability, and their association with disease resistance is not always consistent across environmental conditions. Therefore, although stem polyphenols represent a promising indicator of foot rot susceptibility, their reliability as a selection marker requires validation in diverse breeding materials [14,15].
Currently, cutting-edge crop breeding practices utilize genomics-based approaches, such as molecular markers, genomic selection, and genome editing tools, for precise and efficient improvement in crop production [16,17,18]. However, traits that consist of complex gene networks can be difficult to breed using molecular markers. The production of secondary metabolites is crucial for plant tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses and serves not only as a defense mechanism but also as a potential biomarker for stress tolerance [19]. Ondobo et al. [20] found a negative correlation between the size of necrotic lesions and the total phenolic content in leaves of cocoa affected by black pod disease caused by Phytophthora megakarya, and selected six disease-resistant cocoa lines. Furthermore, Chitarrini et al. [21] conducted extensive metabolomics studies using resistant grapevine cultivars and Bianca grape leaves infected with downy mildew (Plasmopara viticola), identifying 53 putative metabolites as markers for the first time, highlighting the potential of metabolite markers for breeding disease-resistant cultivars.
Taking these findings into consideration, if the basic technology proposed by Setoguchi et al. [9] can be utilized in actual crossbreeding, the potential for primary selection of foot-rot-resistant strains of sweet potato using polyphenol markers will increase. In the present study, we crossed the sweet potato cultivars ‘Tamaakane’ and ‘Konaishin’, which have been shown to be moderately resistant to foot rot, and analyzed the polyphenols in the stems of their progeny seedlings to investigate the relationship between polyphenol content and foot rot resistance. We also grew a sweet potato line that showed the same level of resistance as ‘Tamaakane’, evaluated its agronomic traits, and tested its storage roots through inoculation with the foot rot pathogen. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the applicability of stem polyphenol markers in a crossbreeding population and assess foot rot resistance in sweet potato based on inoculation tests using storage roots. Previous studies, such as Setoguchi et al. [9], focused on variety panels, whereas our study tests the predictivity of these markers in a breeding context.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

Four sweet potato cultivars were used throughout this experiment: ‘Tamaakane’, ‘Konaishin’, ‘Kokei No. 14’, and ‘Beniharuka’. These cultivars were selected based on known information on foot rot ecology and control measures [22]. ‘Tamaakane’ (strong) and ‘Konaishin’ (slightly strong) show moderate resistance to foot rot, whereas ‘Kokei No. 14’ (slightly weak) and ‘Beniharuka’ (weak) are susceptible. As far as we are aware, no sweet potato cultivars grown in Japan have been confirmed to be completely free from foot rot infection. ‘Tamaakane’ and ‘Konaishin’ were used as breeding materials, while ‘Beniharuka’ and ‘Kokei No. 14’ were used as control cultivars for evaluating disease resistance and productivity in subsequent generations.

2.2. Crossing

Crossing was conducted using ‘Konaishin’ as the seed parent and ‘Tamaakane’ as the pollen parent according to the method described by Nakagawa et al. [23], in the research greenhouse at the Research Institute for Bioresources and Biotechnology, Ishikawa Prefectural University (36°30′20.1″ N, 136°35′43″ E). To induce flowering, Ipomoea nil Kidachi was used as the rootstock, and the two cultivars were used as scions for grafting. These grafted plants were cultivated in a greenhouse under natural light at 15–25 °C. All side shoots of the Ipomoea nil Kidachi rootstock were removed, and the main stem was grown to a length of approximately 300 mm and cultivated until it had more than 10 unfolded leaves.
Grafting was performed using the cleft grafting method. Flowering was observed approximately six weeks after grafting. Anthers including pollen were artificially removed from the flowers of ‘Tamaakane’ using sharp-tipped tweezers, and the collected anthers were applied to the stigma of ‘Konaishin’ to perform cross-pollination. The cross-pollination was conducted from September to October 2021, resulting in the acquisition of 17 seeds. In December 2021, the hybrid seeds were treated with sulfuric acid, thoroughly washed with water immediately after treatment, and planted in 10.5 cm diameter pots containing commercially available artificial potting soil (Nafco Co., Fukuoka, Japan). Ultimately, 15 hybrids were obtained and numbered from KT No. 1 to KT No. 15.

2.3. Cultivation Trials of Hybrids

Fourteen hybrids of ‘Konaishin’ and ‘Tamaakane’ (one strain died during seedling cultivation) were propagated by cuttings into three to five plants each and cultivated at an experimental farm at Kushima AoiFarm Co. in Kushima City, Miyazaki prefecture (31°33′30.6″ N, 131°14’45.7″ E). Fifty plants each of ‘Konaishin’ and ‘Tamaakane’ were planted as controls. After fertilization, the andosol soil contained ammonia nitrogen at 1.9 mg 100 g−1, nitrate nitrogen at 0.32 mg 100 g−1, effective phosphoric acid at 28.7 mg 100 g−1, and exchangeable potassium at 42.0 mg 100 g−1 and had a pH of 5.9. Detailed cultivation practices such as irrigation and pesticide application were carried out using methods partially modified from the South Kyushu Region Sweet Potato Cultivation Guidelines (https://www.alic.go.jp/starch/japan/example/200712-03.html, accessed on 20 November 2025) published by the National Agriculture & Livestock Industries Corporation. Each cutting was transplanted on 22 May 2022 at a planting density of 0.84 m × 0.30 m. To check the yield and size of the storage roots, we harvested them at the end of October 2022. Sampling of stems and storage roots from the trial-cultivated plants was conducted randomly to avoid field location and edge effects.

2.4. Stem Polyphenol Analysis

Stem samples of the hybrids of ‘Konaishin’ and ‘Tamaakane’ (KT No. 2 to No. 15) and their parents were collected up to approximately 40 cm from the base of three plants, using the method described by Setoguchi et al. [9] (Figure 1). The collected samples were frozen at −30 °C immediately after collection, lyophilized (FUD-1100, Tokyo Rikakikai, Tokyo, Japan), ground, and stored at −30 °C until analysis. The total polyphenol content of stems from different cultivars was determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu method [24].
First, 0.02 g of lyophilized powder was weighed, and 5 mL of 80% methanol was added. The powder was then extracted for 15 min in an ultrasonic generator. The extraction was filtered through a 0.20 µm syringe filter. Phenol and saturated sodium carbonate reagents were added to the extract and allowed to stand at room temperature for 30 min, after which the absorbance was measured at 760 nm by spectrophotometry. Standard solutions of 20, 50, 100, 150, and 200 mg L−1 were prepared using gallic acid as a sample. The results are expressed as the equivalent of gallic acid per 100 g of fresh weight (FW). Three biological replicates were performed for each treatment.
To further investigate the polyphenols in the stems, we used high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) to determine the polyphenol composition [25]. Polyphenols were extracted using the same method as described above for measuring total polyphenol content. The extracts were analyzed by reversed-phase HPLC using a Prominence LC solution system and an ODS-3 column (particle size 5.0 μm, inner dia. 4.6 mm × length 250 mm; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The mobile phases were A: 100% ethanol, B: 20 mM KH2PO4 (pH 2.4). The binary gradient was as follows: 85–68%B (0–12 min), 68%B (12–15 min), 50–55%B (15–20 min), and 85%B (20–29 min). The column temperature was maintained at 40 °C, the detection wavelength was 320 nm, and the flow rate was 1.0 mL·min−1. Chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic acid, 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, and 4,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid were identified by comparing the retention times and spectra with pure standards. The results are expressed in mg 100 g−1 FW, and the respective percentages were calculated (Figure 2). Three biological replicates were performed for each treatment.

2.5. Foot Rot Inoculation

To investigate the resistance of the hybrids of ‘Konaishin’ and ‘Tamaakane’ (KT No. 2 to No. 15) and their parents to foot rot, we conducted an inoculation test using potted nurseries of each hybrid, following the method of Setoguchi et al. [9]. In addition, ‘Konaishin’ and ‘Tamaakane’, the parents of these hybrids, were tested as controls. Cuttings of these cultivars were collected from the field on 2 September 2021, and transplanted into 10.5 cm diameter black pots on the same day. Nurseries were grown in an unheated glass greenhouse and used for the test once they reached a height of approximately 30 cm (5 nodes or more).
The foot rot was inoculated by making a small cut in the base of the stem (approximately 2 cm above the ground) using a toothpick. The experiment began on 20 September 2022, and the nursery plants were grown in an unheated greenhouse for five weeks. Six strains of foot rot pathogen that we had labeled A to F were used, which were collected from diseased sweet potato plants or storage roots in sweet potato fields in Miyazaki and Kagoshima prefectures (Table 1). Five weeks after inoculation, disease severity was evaluated using the criteria described in Table 2 on a scale of 0 to 5. Disease severity was calculated from the disease index using the following formula:
Disease severity = Mean disease index of strains A–F/6 × 100
Three biological replicates were tested.
Table 1. List of foot rot (Diaporthe destruens) isolated from sweet potato cultivated in the southern Kyushu region used in this study.
Table 1. List of foot rot (Diaporthe destruens) isolated from sweet potato cultivated in the southern Kyushu region used in this study.
Strain zSweet Potato Cultivars from Which the Fungus Was IsolatedOrganSampling Site
A‘Koganesengan’stemKanoya-shi, Kagoshima
B‘Shiroyutaka’stemKanoya-shi, Kagoshima
C‘Koganesengan’stemKanoya-shi, Kagoshima
DUnclearstorage rootMiyazaki-shi, Miyazaki
EUnclearstorage rootMiyakonojo-shi, Miyazaki
FUnclearstemMiyazaki-shi, Miyazaki
z These pathogens are the same as those used in direct inoculation tests by Setoguchi et al. [9]. They were also isolated and maintained using a method modified from that described by Nomiyama et al. [26].
Table 2. Evaluation criteria based on symptoms observed after inoculation with foot rot (Diaporthe destruens) using potted sweet potato nurseries.
Table 2. Evaluation criteria based on symptoms observed after inoculation with foot rot (Diaporthe destruens) using potted sweet potato nurseries.
Evaluation CriteriaSymptoms After Infection with Foot Rot
0No symptoms
1Only the inoculation site was browned
2Disease progresses within 3 nodes
3Disease progresses beyond 3 nodes
4Disease develops on the entire plant but plant does not die
5Plant dies
The inoculation test was conducted using the method described by Setoguchi et al. [9]. The survey involved observing the symptoms of the disease appearing on the stems and leaves and recording them every week.
Inoculation tests were conducted using storage roots of KT No. 7 (which had been evaluated as having “strong” resistance to foot rot) and KT No. 2 (which had been evaluated as having “weak” resistance) based on inoculation tests on stems described above. Storage roots of ‘Tamaakane’ (which is highly resistant to foot rot) and ‘Kokei No. 14’ (weakly resistant to foot rot) were used as controls.
For the tests, moderately sized storage roots were selected from each strain and carefully washed. Strain E of foot rot fungus was then attached to a sterilized toothpick and inoculated by inserting approximately 2 cm into the side of the storage root at three sites per storage root: a crown site, a middle site, and a lower site. The inoculated storage roots were cultured in an artificial climate chamber (Cool Incubator A1201-2V, Ikuta Industry Co., Osaka, Japan) maintained at 28 °C and 85% humidity. After six days of culture, the inoculation sites on the storage roots were cut with a knife, and the blackened infected area was manually selected using the polygon tool in ImageJ 1.54g software [27]. The infected area for each cultivar and hybrid was calculated by dividing the infected area by the total area and multiplying by 100.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All experimental data were obtained from triplicate measurements (three extracts from three independent plants, three measurements per extract), and the data in the figures are the means ± standard deviation. Multiple comparisons were performed using Tukey’s multiple range test or the Games-Howell test with Excel 4.09 Statistics.

3. Results

3.1. Polyphenol Content and Composition of Stems

We developed several hybrids between ‘Konaishin’ and ‘Tamaakane’ that exhibited resistance to foot rot and analyzed the total polyphenol content of their stems (Figure 3). The total polyphenol content of ‘Konaishin’ was 183.1 mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE) 100 g−1 FW, and that of ‘Tamaakane’ was 142.2 mg GAE 100 g−1 FW. These hybrids exhibited total polyphenol contents ranging from higher to lower than those of their parents. Tukey’s multiple range test indicates that KT No. 7 and KT No. 8 were not significantly different from ‘Tamaakane’, whereas KT No. 11 showed a significantly higher content. Among the hybrids, KT No. 11 had the highest total polyphenol content at 233.8 mg GAE 100 g−1 FW, while KT No. 8 and KT No. 7 had the lowest contents at 112.9 mg GAE 100 g−1 FW and 145.9 mg GAE 100 g−1 FW, respectively.
Next, the results of our analysis of the polyphenol composition of the stems of the hybrids between ‘Konaishin’ and ‘Tamaakane’ and their parents are shown in Figure 4. Chromatograms and numeric data for each quantified compound in ‘Konaishin’, ‘Tamaakane’, and the 14 hybrid lines are provided in the Supplemental Materials (Figure S1, Table S1). The stems primarily contained chlorogenic acid, 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, 4,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic acid, and caffeic acid. The polyphenols in the stems of the parents and their hybrids were similar, with either chlorogenic acid or 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid being the most abundant. Among the hybrids, KT No. 8 and KT No. 7, which showed a tendency toward lower total polyphenol content in the stems, had chlorogenic acid contents of 25.3 and 32.2 mg 100 g−1 FW, respectively, accounting for 25% and 32% of the detected polyphenols. In addition, the 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid contents in KT No. 8 and KT No. 7 were 21.4 and 30.8 mg 100 g−1 FW, respectively, accounting for 21% and 31% of the detected polyphenols.

3.2. Foot Rot Inoculation Test

The inoculation test was conducted using six foot rot strains, as described in Setoguchi et al. [9]. Differences in the disease index among the hybrids were observed within several weeks after inoculation. The disease severity values of strains A through F were calculated from the average disease index at five weeks after inoculation, and differences were observed among the values obtained from the different fungal strains. These disease severity values were used as the final indicator of resistance to foot rot in the tested lines.
The control cultivars ‘Konaishin’ and ‘Tamaakane’, which are considered highly resistant to foot rot, also showed disease symptoms, with severity values of 61.1 and 50.0, respectively, five weeks after inoculation (Figure 5). The disease severity values of these hybrids varied significantly depending on the fungal strain and individual plant. Images of KT No. 7 and KT No. 8, which exhibited low total polyphenol content and low disease severity value, as well as KT No. 6 and KT No. 15, which showed clear disease symptoms, are provided in the Supplemental Material (Figure S2). While no clear significant differences were demonstrated, a wide range of disease severity values was observed, with the highest among the hybrids in KT No. 6 (146.0) and lowest in KT No. 7 (1.8). Interestingly, the disease severity values of these hybrids did not fall between those of their parents, ‘Tamaakane’ and ‘Konaishin’, but rather showed a wide range from high to low.
Next, based on the results of the inoculation tests of foot rot on stems, KT No. 7 (highly resistant) and KT No. 2 (weakly resistant) were selected from the hybrids. Inoculation tests with foot rot strain E were then conducted on their storage roots. Simultaneously, the symptoms on the storage roots of the foot-rot-resistant cultivar ‘Tamaakane’ and the susceptible cultivar ‘Kokei No. 14’ were compared. The results showed black discoloration around the toothpick insertion sites, which was particularly pronounced in ‘Kokei No. 14’.
In the storage roots of the susceptible ‘Kokei No. 14’, some specimens exhibited complete decay of the cut surface beyond six days post-inoculation, so the comparative test was conducted at six days. The infected area in the control group, ‘Kokei No. 14’, was 67.5%, while that in ‘Tamaakane’ was significantly smaller at 23.3% (Figure 6A). The infected area in the selected KT No. 7 was 25.9%, which was equivalent to that of ‘Tamaakane’. Meanwhile, the infected area for KT No. 2 was 30.7%. Although not significantly different, this value fell between those of ‘Tamaakane’ and ‘Kokei No. 14’ (Figure 6B).

3.3. Morphological Characteristics of Hybrids

Using the hybrid parents ‘Konaishin’ and ‘Tamaakane’ (Figure 7A,B) as controls, their hybrids were cultivated in the test field, and the storage root yield per plant, individual storage root weight, and characteristics were investigated. The yields of the hybrid parents ‘Konaishin’ and ‘Tamaakane’ were 1011 and 1031 g plant−1, respectively, confirming high values. Four of the 14 hybrids died during seedling production or cultivation. Among the 10 hybrids that survived cultivation, wide variations were observed among the lines. KT No. 3 showed the highest yield at 2239 g plant−1, while KT No. 10 had the lowest at 795 g plant−1, though the difference was not statistically significant. KT No. 7, evaluated as highly resistant to foot rot, yielded 940 g plant−1, comparable to its parents (Figure 7C). Furthermore, KT No. 7 exhibited white flesh similar to that of ‘Konaishin’, and its storage root size distribution was well-balanced, with 40% weighing 100–199 g and 31% weighing 200–299 g. KT No. 2 yielded 828 g plant−1, which was slightly lower than its parents (Figure 7D). However, this line exhibited a strongly expressed purple skin color, a trait that is distinct from its parents.

4. Discussion

To protect themselves from biological stress, plants have developed various sensory systems [28]. As a result, they have evolved a rich array of defense mechanisms to combat diverse pathogens and pests including viruses, nematodes, bacteria, fungi, and herbivorous insects [29]. One of the key components of these defense mechanisms is polyphenols, which are secondary metabolites with diverse functions that mitigate biological stresses [30].
Recently, Setoguchi et al. [9] focused on polyphenols in the stems, the main infection site of foot rot in the field and proposed that polyphenols could be a potential selection marker for foot rot resistance based on a unique fungal strategy that differed from those described in previous reports. They revealed that cultivars with low stem polyphenol content exhibit low susceptibility to foot rot, whereas cultivars with high stem polyphenol content show high susceptibility. Furthermore, they reported strong positive correlations between susceptibility to foot rot and several polyphenols, including 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic acid and chlorogenic acid. In this study, we aimed to verify whether foot-rot-resistant sweet potato lines could be selected by growing seedlings from crosses of sweet potato cultivars and analyzing their stem polyphenols.
The 14 hybrids derived from ‘Konaishin’ and ‘Tamaakane’, which are reported to be resistant to foot rot, showed a wide range in both total polyphenol content and resistance to foot rot. Among these hybrids, KT No. 7, which has a low total polyphenol content in the stems, had the lowest disease severity value after direct inoculation with foot rot fungus. This result is consistent with the trend reported by Setoguchi et al. [9] and suggests that stem polyphenols could serve as a preliminary indicator of foot rot resistance. However, not all hybrids showed the same tendency. For example, KT No. 8 also had a low stem polyphenol content, whereas KT No. 11 had the highest among the hybrids, but their disease severity values were not consistent with their polyphenol level. These findings indicate that the relationship between stem polyphenol content and foot rot resistance is not always straightforward, and that polyphenol content should be regarded as a supportive rather than decisive indicator in the selection of resistant lines.
Setoguchi et al. [9] also conducted in vitro growth tests using media supplemented with polyphenols and found that low concentrations of chlorogenic acid-supplemented media promoted the growth of the foot rot fungus, suggesting that the pathogen may metabolize chlorogenic acid as a nutrient source. Furthermore, although polyphenols such as chlorogenic acid contained in sweet potatoes vary depending on the organ and genotype, it is presumed that infection begins when the concentration of polyphenols such as chlorogenic acid in the stem reaches an optimal level for infection by the foot rot pathogen. In other words, it may be difficult for foot rot infection to develop in plant genotypes that have a low polyphenol concentration in the stem (the main site of infection). In this study, KT No. 7, which had a low total polyphenol content in the stem, also showed resistance to foot rot. However, no significant correlation was found between the disease severity value of foot rot and the total polyphenol content, chlorogenic acid content, 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic acid content, or 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid content in any of the hybrids.
The concentrations and composition of phytochemicals such as polyphenols in plants are known to be affected by seasonal variations [31,32]. In particular, this has been reported to be due to variations in soil composition, seasonal responses to various pathogens, and environmental variables (abiotic factors) such as temperature and precipitation [33,34]. To minimize the influence of such environmental variability in the present study, all plant materials were cultivated under the same field conditions and managed using identical agronomic practices. In addition, stem samples from all lines were collected on the same day and at the same developmental stage to reduce temporal variation.
Using polyphenols, which are susceptible to such biological and non-biological influences, as markers may make it difficult to accurately determine the degree of disease resistance expression; however, using these polyphenol markers and comparing them with the control area under the same conditions, it is highly likely that only cultivars with strong disease resistance can be selected in the primary screening.
Generally, storage roots infected with sweet potato foot rot are characterized by dark brown discoloration that starts primarily from the crown site, becoming slightly hardened and decayed. Usui and Kushima [35] established an experimental method to evaluate differences in infection capacity based on a four-level scale. This method involves infecting storage root sections with foot rot pathogens in vitro and assessing the degree of discoloration caused by infection of the storage roots. Furthermore, Kobayashi et al. [36] evaluated foot rot resistance in contaminated areas by assessing the degree of blackening at the stem base and the frequency of healthy storage root weight at harvest for each strain.
As described above, evaluating storage root discoloration is considered a crucial indicator for assessing the degree of resistance to foot rot. To evaluate the infectivity of potato late blight disease caused by Phytophthora infestans, potato storage root sections are infected in vitro, and the disease lesion area indicating mycelial growth after an incubation period is used for assessment [37]. Based on these findings, we established a method for meticulously evaluating the resistance of sweet potato to foot rot using sweet potato storage roots. However, to assess the degree of resistance in greater detail, further examination of experimental conditions such as culture environment, inoculation site, and the growth stage of storage roots is required.
The key breeding objectives for table use cultivars are excellent taste, good appearance, disease and pest resistance, and high yield. In addition, breeding programs for cultivars suitable for food processing as starch-producing cultivars have also been actively promoted [38]. The breeding parents used in this study, ‘Konaishin’ and ‘Tamaakane’, are relatively resistant to foot rot disease and are used as raw material for starch and shochu (Japanese distilled liquor), respectively. Although the starch characteristics of KT No. 7 selected in this study were not investigated, this line showed storage root yield and storage root morphology similar to those of ‘Konaishin’. Therefore, KT No. 7 has potential as a breeding material for starch production with high resistance to foot rot.
As described above, the selection method using stem polyphenols as markers [9] successfully selected hybrid lines with foot rot resistance comparable to that of ‘Tamaakane’, demonstrating the potential reliability of this technique. Furthermore, evaluation of the resistance to foot rot in storage roots of KT No. 7, which was selected as a candidate line with low polyphenol content, confirmed a resistance level equivalent to that of ‘Tamaakane’. These results indicate that the use of polyphenol markers in sweet potato breeding is a promising approach that enables easy and efficient primary selection using stems as test material.
In our population of 14 hybrid lines derived from ‘Konaishin’ and ‘Tamaakane’, we further evaluated the practical efficiency of using stem polyphenol content as a preliminary screening criterion. KT No. 8 and KT No. 7 showed the lowest total stem polyphenol contents (112.9 and 145.9 mg GAE 100 g−1 FW, respectively), and these two lines also exhibited the lowest disease severity values (16.4 and 1.8), indicating the strongest resistance in our inoculation tests. Therefore, by selecting only the lines with lower stem polyphenol contents, the number of candidates requiring inoculation testing could be reduced from 14 to 2, while still retaining the two most resistant lines. These results suggest that stem polyphenol profiling can serve as a practical and efficient pre-screening tool for enriching resistant candidates prior to inoculation testing.

5. Conclusions

In Asia, including Japan, foot rot disease is prevalent in major sweet-potato-producing areas, making the development of disease-resistant cultivars an urgent task. In this study, we crossed sweet potato cultivars, analyzed the polyphenols in the stems of the resulting hybrid lines, and examined the possibility of selecting foot-rot-resistant lines. Although the measured values of stem polyphenol content may fluctuate depending on genetic and environmental factors, we suggest that it may be useful as a marker for identifying promising candidates with foot rot resistance. To our knowledge, this is the first report evaluating foot rot resistance in storage roots of sweet potato. Further work is needed to clarify the molecular genetic mechanism by which low polyphenol content in stems confers foot rot resistance. Elucidation of these mechanisms may improve the efficiency of screening for foot-rot-resistant lines in sweet potato breeding programs.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/horticulturae11121439/s1, Figure S1. HPLC chromatogram of polyphenols in stem of sweet potato ‘Tamaakane’ and ‘Konaishin’ and 14 hybrid strains. Figure S2. Appearance of nurseries of KT No. 6, KT No. 7, KT No. 8 and KT No. 15 at 35 days after inoculation with the sweet potato foot rot pathogen A. Table S1 Comparison of contents of chlorogenic acid, 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic acid, 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, and 4,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid in stems of sweet potato ‘Tamaakane’ and ‘Konaishin’ and 14 hybrid strains.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.N. and H.K.; methodology, Y.N.; validation, Y.N., Y.S. and H.F.; formal analysis, Y.N.; investigation, Y.N., Y.S. and H.F.; resources, Y.N., Y.S. and H.F.; data curation, Y.N.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.N.; writing—review and editing, H.K., T.H., M.O. and M.T.; visualization, Y.N.; supervision, H.K., T.H., M.O. and M.T.; project administration, H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Yosuke Narasako was employed by the company Kushima AoiFarm Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cartabiano-Leite, C.E.; Porcu, O.M.; de Casas, A.F. Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L. Lam) nutritional potential and social relevance: A review. Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 2020, 10, 23–40. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmed, S.; Khan, S.S.M.; Xue, S.; Islam, F.; Ikram, U.A.; Abdullah, M.; Liu, S.; Tappiban, P.; Chen, J. A comprehensive overview of omics-based approaches to enhance biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in sweet potato. Hortic. Res. 2024, 11, uhae014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Angelotti, F.; Hamada, E.; Bettiol, W. A Comprehensive Review of Climate Change and Plant Diseases in Brazil. Plants 2024, 13, 2447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Harter, L. The foot-rot of the sweet potato. J. Agric. Res. 1913, 1, 251–273. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kobayashi, Y. Outbreak and Management of foot rot of sweetpotato. Plant Prot. 2019, 73, 501–505. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  6. Gai, Y.; Ma, H.; Chen, X.; Zheng, J.; Chen, H.; Li, H. Stem blight, foot rot and storage tuber rot of sweet potato caused by Plenodomus destruens in China. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2016, 82, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Maeda, A.; Minoshima, A.; Kawano, S. Foot rot disease of sweet potato in Japan caused by Diaporthe destruens: First report, pathogenicity and taxonomy. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2022, 88, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Huang, L.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Y.; Zou, H.; Fang, B.; Liu, W. High-Quality Genome Resource of Diaporthe destruens Causing Foot Rot Disease of Sweet Potato. Plant Dis. 2021, 105, 3279–3281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Setoguchi, Y.; Fukutome, H.; Narasako, Y.; Hirano, T.; Otani, M.; Takeshita, M.; Kunitake, H. Effect of Stem Polyphenol Content on the Susceptibility to Foot Rot Disease in Sweetpotato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.]. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2025, 150, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ramaroson, M.-L.; Koutouan, C.; Helesbeux, J.-J.; Le Clerc, V.; Hamama, L.; Geoffriau, E.; Briard, M. Role of Phenylpropanoids and Flavonoids in Plant Resistance to Pests and Diseases. Molecules 2022, 27, 8371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhong, J.; Ran, Q.; Han, Y.; Gan, L.; Dong, C. Biosynthetic Mechanisms of Plant Chlorogenic Acid from a Microbiological Perspective. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Naoumkina, M.A.; Zhao, Q.; Gallego-Giraldo, L.; Dai, X.; Zhao, P.X.; Dixon, R.A. Genome-Wide Analysis of Phenylpropanoid Defence Pathways. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2010, 11, 829–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jeandet, P.; Hébrard, C.; Deville, M.A.; Cordelier, S.; Dorey, S.; Aziz, A.; Crouzet, J. Deciphering the Role of Phytoalexins in Plant-Microorganism Interactions and Human Health. Molecules 2014, 19, 18033–18056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rao, M.J.; Zheng, B. The Role of Polyphenols in Abiotic Stress Tolerance and Their Antioxidant Properties to Scavenge Reactive Oxygen Species and Free Radicals. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Qaderi, M.M.; Martel, A.B.; Strugnell, C.A. Environmental Factors Regulate Plant Secondary Metabolites. Plants 2023, 12, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kumar, R.; Das, S.P.; Choudhury, B.U.; Kumar, A.; Prakash, N.R.; Verma, R.; Chakraborti, M.; Devi, A.G.; Bhattacharjee, B.; Das, R.; et al. Advances in genomic tools for plant breeding: Harnessing DNA molecular markers, genomic selection, and genome editing. Biol. Res. 2024, 57, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Varshney, R.K.; Bohra, A.; Roorkiwal, M.; Barmukh, R.; Cowling, W.A.; Chitikineni, A.; Lam, H.-M.; Hickey, L.T.; Croser, J.S.; Bayer, P.E.; et al. Fast-forward breeding for a food-secure world. Trends Genet. 2021, 37, 1124–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Varshney, R.K.; Bohra, A.; Yu, J.; Graner, A.; Zhang, Q.; Sorrells, M.E. Designing Future Crops: Genomics-Assisted Breeding Comes of Age. Trends Plant Sci. 2021, 26, 631–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Njihia, J.N.; Simbauni, J.N.; Kinyua, N.W.; Isutsa, D.K.; Muraya, M.M. Secondary Metabolites as Biomarkers in Breeding for Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Plants. Afr. J. Hortic. Sci. 2024, 24, 77–92. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ondobo, M.L.; Onomo, P.E.; Djocgoue, P.F.; Ndhaga, J.M.; Boudjeko, T.; Ndoumou, D.P. Phenolic content and heritability of resistance in four hybrid populations of Theobroma cacao L. after leaves inoculation with Phytophthora megakarya Bras. et Grif. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2014, 8, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  21. Chitarrini, G.; Soini, E.; Riccadonna, S.; Franceschi, P.; Zulini, L.; Masuero, D.; Vecchione, A.; Stefanini, M.; Di Gaspero, G.; Mattivi, F.; et al. Identification of Biomarkers for Defence Response to Plasmopara viticola in a Resistant Grape Variety. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution (BRAIN). Ecology and Control of Foot Rot. 2023. Available online: https://www.naro.go.jp/publicity_report/publication/files/stem_blight_and_storage_tuber_rot_of_sweetpotator04a.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2025). (In Japanese).
  23. Nakagawa, S.; Setoguchi, Y.; Ohmura, R.; Toshima, S.; Park, H.; Narasako, Y.; Hirano, T.; Otani, M.; Kunitake, H. Effects of cross combination on the total content and its composition of anthocyanins in sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas L.). Sci. Hortic. 2022, 299, 110999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Singleton, V.L.; Rossi, J.A. Colorimetry of Total Phenolics with Phosphomolybdic-Phosphotungstic Acid Reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1965, 16, 144–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sasaki, K.; Oki, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Kai, Y.; Okuno, S. Single-laboratory validation for the determination of caffeic acid and seven caffeoylquinic acids in sweet potato leaves. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2014, 78, 2073–2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nomiyama, K.; Tomioka, K.; Nakaho, K. Generation and soil detection of nitrate-nonutilizing mutants of Diaporthe destruens causing foot rot of sweet potato. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2022, 88, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schneider, C.A.; Rasband, W.S.; Eliceiri, K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lamers, J.; Der Meer, T.V.; Testerink, C. How plants sense and respond to stressful environments. Plant Physiol. 2020, 182, 1624–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jones, J.D.G.; Staskawicz, B.J.; Dangl, J.L. The plant immune system: From discovery to deployment. Cell 2024, 187, 2095–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tak, Y.; Kumar, M. Phenolics: A Key Defence Secondary Metabolite to Counter Biotic Stress. In Plant Phenolics in Sustainable Agriculture; Lone, R., Shuab, R., Kamili, A., Eds.; 2020; pp. 309–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Uma, S.; Seema, B.; Vinod, K.G. Effect of Seasonal Variation on Secondary Metabolites of Medicinal Plants. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2015, 6, 3654–3662. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yao, L.; Caffin, N.; D’arcy, B.; Jiang, Y.; Shi, J.; Singanusong, R.; Liu, X.; Datta, N.; Kakuda, Y.; Xu, Y. Seasonal Variations of Phenolic Compounds in Australia-Grown Tea (Camellia sinensis). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 6477–6483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ramakrishna, A.; Ravishankar, G.A. Influence of abiotic stress signals on secondary metabolites in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 1720–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sahoo, K.P.; Kasera, P.K.; Mohammed, S. Secondary metabolites produced during different seasons in some arid medicinal plants. Asian J. Plant Sci. Res. 2012, 2, 650–652. [Google Scholar]
  35. Usui, M.; Kushima, Y. Occurrence of sweet potato foot rot in Miyazaki and elucidation of the primary inoculum source, and examination of seedling collection method for its control. Kyushu Plant Prot. Res. 2020, 66, 12–17. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kobayashi, A.; Kawata, Y.; Sakaigaichi, T.; Suematsu, K.; Kai, Y.; Kobayashi, Y.O. Evaluation of 47 sweetpotato varieties for resistance to foot rot disease. Breed. Res. 2025, 27, 19–29. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Léger, G.; Novinscak, A.; Biessy, A.; Lamarre, S.; Filion, M. In Tuber Biocontrol of Potato Late Blight by a Collection of Phenazine-1-Carboxylic Acid-Producing Pseudomonas spp. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Katayama, K.; Kobayashi, A.; Sakai, T.; Kuranouchi, T.; Kai, Y. Recent progress in sweetpotato breeding and cultivars for diverse applications in Japan. Breed. Sci. 2017, 67, 3–14. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The healthy stem of KT No. 7, a hybrid of ‘Konaishin’ and ‘Tamaakane’ (early July).
Figure 1. The healthy stem of KT No. 7, a hybrid of ‘Konaishin’ and ‘Tamaakane’ (early July).
Horticulturae 11 01439 g001
Figure 2. HPLC chromatogram of polyphenols in stem of sweet potato ‘Beniharuka. Peak No. 1: Chlorogenic acid, 2: Caffeic acid, 3: 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic acid, 4: 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, 5: 4,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid.
Figure 2. HPLC chromatogram of polyphenols in stem of sweet potato ‘Beniharuka. Peak No. 1: Chlorogenic acid, 2: Caffeic acid, 3: 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic acid, 4: 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, 5: 4,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid.
Horticulturae 11 01439 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of total polyphenol content in stems of sweet potato ‘Tamaakane’ and ‘Konaishin’ and 14 hybrid strains. Different letters represent significant differences at 5% level as determined by Tukey’s multiple range test (n = 3).
Figure 3. Comparison of total polyphenol content in stems of sweet potato ‘Tamaakane’ and ‘Konaishin’ and 14 hybrid strains. Different letters represent significant differences at 5% level as determined by Tukey’s multiple range test (n = 3).
Horticulturae 11 01439 g003
Figure 4. Comparison of contents of chlorogenic acid, 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic acid, 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, and 4,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid in stems of sweet potato ‘Tamaakane’ and ‘Konaishin’ and 14 hybrid strains. Different letters represent significant differences at 5% level as determined by Tukey’s multiple range test (n = 3). NS = not significant.
Figure 4. Comparison of contents of chlorogenic acid, 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic acid, 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, and 4,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid in stems of sweet potato ‘Tamaakane’ and ‘Konaishin’ and 14 hybrid strains. Different letters represent significant differences at 5% level as determined by Tukey’s multiple range test (n = 3). NS = not significant.
Horticulturae 11 01439 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of disease severity after inoculation with six strains of foot rot (Diaporthe destruens) in potted nurseries of sweet potato ‘Tamaakane’ and ‘Konaishin’ and 14 hybrid strains. Different letters represent significant differences at 5% level as determined by Tukey’s multiple range test (n = 6).
Figure 5. Comparison of disease severity after inoculation with six strains of foot rot (Diaporthe destruens) in potted nurseries of sweet potato ‘Tamaakane’ and ‘Konaishin’ and 14 hybrid strains. Different letters represent significant differences at 5% level as determined by Tukey’s multiple range test (n = 6).
Horticulturae 11 01439 g005
Figure 6. Cross-sectional view of the infection site (A) and infected area (B) of sweet potato storage roots infected with strain E of foot rot (Diaporthe destruens) 6 days after infection. Bar = 5 cm. For the inoculation test with foot rot, KT No. 7 and KT No. 2 were selected, and ‘Tamaakane’ and ‘Kokei No. 14’ were used as controls. Different letters represent significant differences at 5% level as determined by Tukey’s multiple range test (n = 3).
Figure 6. Cross-sectional view of the infection site (A) and infected area (B) of sweet potato storage roots infected with strain E of foot rot (Diaporthe destruens) 6 days after infection. Bar = 5 cm. For the inoculation test with foot rot, KT No. 7 and KT No. 2 were selected, and ‘Tamaakane’ and ‘Kokei No. 14’ were used as controls. Different letters represent significant differences at 5% level as determined by Tukey’s multiple range test (n = 3).
Horticulturae 11 01439 g006
Figure 7. Characteristics of the storage roots of ‘Konaishin’ (A) and ‘Tamaakane’ (B), which are highly resistant to foot rot (Diaporthe destruens), and their hybrids KT No. 7 (C) and KT No. 2 (D). Bar = 10 cm.
Figure 7. Characteristics of the storage roots of ‘Konaishin’ (A) and ‘Tamaakane’ (B), which are highly resistant to foot rot (Diaporthe destruens), and their hybrids KT No. 7 (C) and KT No. 2 (D). Bar = 10 cm.
Horticulturae 11 01439 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Narasako, Y.; Setoguchi, Y.; Fukutome, H.; Hirano, T.; Otani, M.; Takeshita, M.; Kunitake, H. Evaluation of Stem Polyphenol Content as a Potential Marker for Selecting Foot-Rot-Resistant Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) Hybrids. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 1439. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11121439

AMA Style

Narasako Y, Setoguchi Y, Fukutome H, Hirano T, Otani M, Takeshita M, Kunitake H. Evaluation of Stem Polyphenol Content as a Potential Marker for Selecting Foot-Rot-Resistant Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) Hybrids. Horticulturae. 2025; 11(12):1439. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11121439

Chicago/Turabian Style

Narasako, Yosuke, Yuno Setoguchi, Haruka Fukutome, Tomonari Hirano, Motoyasu Otani, Minoru Takeshita, and Hisato Kunitake. 2025. "Evaluation of Stem Polyphenol Content as a Potential Marker for Selecting Foot-Rot-Resistant Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) Hybrids" Horticulturae 11, no. 12: 1439. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11121439

APA Style

Narasako, Y., Setoguchi, Y., Fukutome, H., Hirano, T., Otani, M., Takeshita, M., & Kunitake, H. (2025). Evaluation of Stem Polyphenol Content as a Potential Marker for Selecting Foot-Rot-Resistant Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) Hybrids. Horticulturae, 11(12), 1439. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11121439

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop