Next Article in Journal
Physiological and Transcriptomic Analysis of Citrus Fruit Segment Drying under Facility-Forcing Cultivation
Previous Article in Journal
A Review on Biocontrol Agents as Sustainable Approach for Crop Disease Management: Applications, Production, and Future Perspectives
Previous Article in Special Issue
Variation in the Photosynthetic Leaf Pigments of Different Basil (Ocimum spp.) Genotypes under Varying Conditions at the Flowering Stage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Silicon: A Powerful Aid for Medicinal and Aromatic Plants against Abiotic and Biotic Stresses for Sustainable Agriculture

1
Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt
2
Department of Environmental and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi 59911, United Arab Emirates
3
Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11241, Egypt
4
Water Relations and Field Irrigation Department, Agricultural and Biological Research Institute, National Research Center, Giza 12622, Egypt
5
Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2024, 10(8), 806; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10080806
Submission received: 4 July 2024 / Revised: 16 July 2024 / Accepted: 27 July 2024 / Published: 30 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Insights into the Phenology of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants)

Abstract

:
Silicon plays a crucial role in enhancing plant tolerance to various abiotic and biotic stresses, including drought, salinity, heavy metals, and pathogen/pest attacks. Its application has shown promising results in improving stress tolerance and productivity in medicinal plants. This review synthesizes findings from numerous studies investigating the mechanisms by which silicon confers stress tolerance, including the regulation of antioxidant systems, water relations, nutrient homeostasis, phytohormone signaling, and stress-responsive gene expression. Additionally, it examines the effects of silicon supplementation on the production of valuable secondary metabolites and essential oils in medicinal plants. Silicon application can significantly mitigate stress-induced damage in plants, including medicinally important species such as borage, honeysuckle, licorice, Damask rose, savory, basil, and eucalyptus. The deposition of silicon in cell walls provides physical reinforcement and acts as a barrier against pathogen invasion and insect herbivory. Furthermore, silicon fertilization can enhance the production of valuable secondary metabolites in medicinal crops under stress conditions. The findings underscore the potential of silicon fertilization as a sustainable strategy for improving the productivity and quality of medicinal crops under changing environmental conditions, highlighting the need for further research to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying silicon-mediated stress tolerance and practical applications in medicinal plant cultivation.

1. Introduction

Apart from being a source of food, medicinal and aromatic plants (M&APs) and their active ingredients are also used as non-food industrial products, pharmaceuticals, herbal health products, cosmetics, and pesticides [1,2]. China, India, and some other countries have supported the official use of traditional (folk) medicine systems in their healthcare systems [3,4]. China and India are at the top of the exporting countries, and Japan and Korea are at the top of the importing countries. Countries such as Germany and the United States stand out as important commercial centers for M&AP trade [5]. More than 2500 species of M&APs are spread around the world and belong to many important plant families such as Lamiaceae, Asteraceae, Apocyanaceae, Oleaceae, Fabaceae, and more. Indeed, M&APs have been used for thousands of years to prevent and treat diseases and have a long history in this context [6]. According to the World Health Organization, about 80% of the world’s population still depends on medicinal herbs; however, the production of secondary metabolic products from medical plants depends on environmental conditions [7]. M&APs produce many beneficial secondary metabolic products, as these substances have antimicrobial properties, contain a large number of antioxidants, and have other properties for medical use [8,9,10]. As a result of climate change in recent decades, several adverse impacts have been observed in plants due to abiotic stresses such as salinity, drought, cold, high temperature, heavy metals, waterlogging, and nutrient imbalance, which have decreased crop productivity by 51–82% [11,12]. Contemporary climate change leads to drought and thermal stresses, which are among the most prominent types of stress that lead to a significant reduction in the productivity of several crops including medicinal plants [13,14]. Therefore, abiotic stresses are considered one of the most important obstacles globally facing plant productivity in the era of unexpected climate change [15,16].
Silicon (Si) is considered a micronutrient that has diverse benefit roles in plants, particularly under several stressful conditions [17,18]. It enhances plant growth and productivity, photosynthesis, and nitrogen fixation, and increases plants’ tolerance to various abiotic and biotic stresses such as high temperature, heavy metals, drought, salinity, and pathogens [19,20,21,22,23]. In the past, it was believed that Si was an unnecessary element for plant growth [24], but after many studies, it was proven beyond doubt that Si has several physiological and biochemical roles that participate in enhancing plant stress tolerance and therefore it is considered as a semi-essential element [25]. Si is a plant nutrient that provides strength to the plant, as it supports the plant cell and makes the tissues more solid and strong [26]. Soluble silicon can enhance plant resistance to pathogens by interacting with the basic compounds of the stress signaling system within the plant [27,28]. Moreover, Si accumulation within the plant leads to the production of phenols and phytoalexins that make the plant more resistant to various pathogens [29,30]. Due to the positive impact of Si on achieving sustainable crop productivity, an organic liquid fertilizer containing Si has been developed as an alternative to chemical fertilizers [31].

2. Silicon’s Role in Plant Growth and Development

Actually, Si is the second most prevalent element on Earth’s surface and has been proven to enhance plant growth and development [32]. Although silicon is not a necessary element for plants, multiple studies have shown that it improves growth, production, and crop quality while also offering tolerance to abiotic and biotic challenges [33,34,35,36]. Si is absorbed by plant roots as uncharged silicic acid and transferred to the shoot via the transpiration stream. Aquaporins, especially the NIP subfamily, known as silicic acid channels, enhance the uptake of silicic acid [37]. In this part, we will highlight our current understanding of Si’s involvement in plant biology.

3. Plant Structure and Function

Si is considered a non-essential nutrient for plant nutrition [38]. Nonetheless, the biostimulatory effects of Si on plant growth and development are well-documented [39,40]. Whereas elements such as silicon, selenium, cobalt, and aluminum might influence physiological processes to enhance plant growth and productivity under changing environmental conditions, silicon is often classified as a ‘quasi-essential’ element for higher plants [41]. Increased availability of Si could hasten plant development, while Si deficiency might result in morphological abnormalities [42,43]. One of the critical functions of Si in plants is promoting leaf erectness, which boosts light interception and canopy photosynthesis [44]. This is achieved through the deposition of polymerized amorphous silica (SiO2-nH2O) in the plant cell wall, which increases the rigidity of stems and leaves and minimizes lodging [45]. Moreover, Si contributes to seed germination, cell membrane integrity, carbon absorption, and plant–water interactions and stimulates the action of antioxidants, phytohormone production, and nutrient acquisition [46,47]. Silicon is required to construct the cuticle–silica double layer beneath the leaf epidermis, resulting in decreased transpiration rates in Si-treated plants compared to controls. This reduction in transpiration is an important element in silicon-mediated stress tolerance. Furthermore, silica deposition in tissues reduces transpiration and improves light absorption, hence mitigating drought stress [46]. Moreover, the application of Si increased plant height, stem diameter, biomass accumulation, protected photosynthetic pigments, improved gas exchange, promoted ATP production, and enhanced enzyme activity and gene expression related to photosynthesis under low-calcium conditions [47]. The formation of phytoliths, solid particles of polymerized SiO2, in cell walls provides mechanical strength and structural stability [48]. Since Si is not transportable through the phloem, Si distribution was adjusted by transpiration, resulting in higher accumulation in older tissues [49].
Si interacts with cell wall components such as hemicellulose, pectin, lignin, cellulose, callose, and mixed-linked glucans, aiding in crosslinking and thus enhancing cell wall rigidity and mechanical strength [45,50]. Better growth was linked to higher foliar C:N or C:P ratios, suggesting improved nutrient-use efficiency with increased plant-available and/or foliar Si [45]. Silicon application enhances the number of chloroplasts in mesophyll cells, as well as the lamellar structure, promoting the progression of photosynthetic phosphorylation, lowering the concentration of intercellular CO2, delaying the decline in rice chlorophyll content, and increasing photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance [51]. Silicon-enhanced plant tolerance is due to the elevated activity of defense-related enzymes; however, the exact mechanisms of Si action are unknown. Silicon-mediated plant stress tolerance can be attributed to (i) indirect influence by stimulating the plant signaling system, resulting in the formation or activation of defense-related enzymes; or (ii) the direct influence on the additional synthesis of enzymes and proteins involved in ROS scavenging [52]. In general, Si positively alters plant growth, development, and stress responses via modifying cell wall architecture, increasing leaf erectness, and improving structural integrity. Plants with higher Si absorption efficiency benefit more from Si availability than Si excluders, resulting in significant changes in morphology, anatomy, physiology, and metabolic activities [53,54,55,56,57,58]. Significant implications of Si include enhanced enzyme activity, antioxidant capacity, plant water relations, photosynthesis, ion absorption, hormone balance, and gene expression [21,51].

4. Oxidative Damage

Oxidative damage, a result of stress, impairs plant metabolism by overproducing reactive oxygen species (ROS), damaging proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, and DNA, and affecting metabolic functions depending on the causal stress factor [54]. To alleviate the deleterious effects of such stresses, plants adapt various mechanisms such as the compatible solutes accumulation that maintain cell turgidity and induce the antioxidant enzymes required for ROS. Actually, Si has been shown to boost the activity of various antioxidant enzymes, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione reductase (GR), guaiacol peroxidase (GPX), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) [16,59,60,61]. Silicon application boosts the AOX system during drought stress in tomato plants, where a Si-mediated substantial decrease in reactive oxygen species (ROS) was reported [62]. Si treatment is also related to lower levels of reactive molecules that cause oxidative damage, such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), as well as metabolites originating from lipid peroxidation, such as malondialdehyde (MDA) [63].

5. Water Relations

Silicon has been demonstrated to alter water relations in plants, especially under abiotic stress situations. It enhances plant growth traits like plant height, leaf area, and leaf dry weight, as well as gas exchange characteristics like photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance, and therefore increases dry mass output by minimizing water losses through transpiration [64]. It has been reported that Si treatment minimized transpiration in plants, possibly due to the creation of a silica cuticle double layer under the leaf epidermis, which reduces water losses through cuticular transpiration [65,66]. It might also enhance water uptake and transportation, improve leaf water potential, and modify root hydraulic conductance, leading to higher stomatal conductance and transpiration rates. Si-induced alterations in stomatal response may help plants solve the challenge of maintaining stomatal openness for CO2 absorption while avoiding water stress. Under salinity conditions, Si treatment was also discovered to improve water relations, allowing for better growth rates and mitigating salt toxicity effects [67,68,69] Si promotes root water uptake by activating osmotic adjustment and increasing aquaporin activity [67]. Under salinity stress, Si application has also been shown to improve water relations, enabling faster growth rates and mitigating salt toxicity effects by blocking the passage of Na+ ions into plants [68]. Silicon may improve or increase the rate of stomatal conductance by protecting the stomatal aperture from degradation [69].

6. Nutrient Uptake and Balance

Exogenous Si supply has the function of balancing mineral uptake and mobility in stressed plants, especially when caused by uneven nutrient supply or root exposure to relatively high concentrations of harmful substances [16,48]. For example, under a high phosphorus (P) supply, zinc (Zn) deficiency can occur. However, the application of Si may successfully prevent this imbalance [18]. Furthermore, Si has been observed to mitigate the symptoms of Cu, B, and Mn toxicity and Fe-deficient stress in plants [70,71,72]. Si lowered Mn concentrations, enhanced SOD, APX, and ascorbate-glutathione cycle activity, and decreased H2O2 levels in the leaves, reducing Mn toxicity to cucumber plants [70]. Si’s ability to reduce the transit of B, Cl, and Na may be attributed to its irreversible precipitation as amorphous silica (SiO2·nH2O) in cell walls and lumens. This has been considered to limit the transportation of salts into shoots [71]. Si and nSi (nano silicon) have significant effects on plant biomass by improving photosynthetic performance and regulating nutrient uptake–accumulation and mineral element distribution from root to shoot, as well as reducing oxidative stress [72]. The application of Si has been shown to minimize the plants’ uptake of unfavorable non-nutrient ions like Na+ and Cl, as well as hazardous metals like Al, Cd, and hexavalent chromium [16,73,74]. Numerous physiological mechanisms contribute to Si’s beneficial impacts on mineral uptake and transport into plant tissues. One key mechanism is Si’s ability to maintain membrane selectivity to ion influx and efflux, thus avoiding or reducing increases in plasma membrane permeability produced under stresses. Reports have shown that Si protects plasma membrane integrity in plants cultivated under stress conditions [75,76,77]. Si can play an important role in lowering shoot sodium content in rice by blocking bypass flow, most likely through the development of silica gels or polysilicic acids, as well as improving suberization and lignification [75]. Silicon accumulation in the root is related to a reduction in apoplastic bypass flow. Casparian bands normally prevent ions and water from moving through the apoplast’s endodermis [76]. Si increased the stability of lipids in plant cell membranes under drought and heat stress, implying that Si avoided the structural and functional degeneration of cell membranes when plants were stressed by the environment [77]. These findings emphasize silicon’s various roles in plant stress tolerance, as well as its potential to help design sustainable cropping systems.

7. Phytohormone Regulation

Exogenous Si supply has been investigated for its impact on endogenous phytohormone levels, as well as its relationship to stimulatory Si actions on plants. Silicon has been shown to affect the levels of endogenous phytohormones, particularly in response to stress, and this interaction is critical for improving plant resilience and growth. For example, in plants exposed to heavy metals, Si has been found to decrease the endogenous levels of jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) [50]. It has also been observed to boost cytokinin production [78]. Moreover, a considerable reduction in endogenous gibberellin levels was observed in plants subjected to salt stress; however, Si application prevented this reduction [79]. Rice plants that were treated with Si and exposed to wounding stress had considerably lower JA levels than control plants. As a result, the relative expression levels of mRNA for JA biosynthesis gene regulation during Si and wounding stress treatments were investigated, and it was demonstrated that the JA synthesis-related genes respond to wounding stress during Si application [80]. However, further research is needed to acquire a better understanding of the specific processes by which Si impacts phytohormone levels, as well as their effects on plant physiology and stress responses.

8. Gene Expression

The effects of exogenous Si supplementation on gene expression in stressed plants have been investigated. Si was discovered to promote the expression of transcription factors involved in drought-responsive gene expression in rice, such as NAC5 and DREB2A, and to downregulate the mRNA expression of enzymes encoding heavy metal transporters in rice plants exposed to high-Cd and high-Cu stress [81]. Furthermore, Si was also shown to activate and regulate several photosynthesis-related genes in response to high-Zn stress, thus enhancing photosynthesis in Zn-stressed plants. Also, Si may trigger accelerated expression of the PsbY gene in rice, which encodes a new manganese-binding, low-molecular-mass protein involved with PSII (Photosystem II). The activation of PsbY mRNA transcripts may boost PSII activity and electron transfer rate in rice, as evidenced by an increase in chlorophyll content [82]. Moreover, Si also triggered the upregulation of genes involved in defense and stress response: disease resistance response protein, ferritin, late embryogenesis abundant protein, trehalose phosphatase, and acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase [83]. Si’s bioactivity as a regulator of plant defense mechanisms can be explained by its biochemical characteristics. Si can bind to hydroxyl groups on proteins that are strategically implicated in signal transduction. Si may also interact with the cationic cofactors of enzymes, altering pathogenesis-related activities. As a result, Si may interact with a number of important components of plant stress signaling systems, causing induced resistance. In a previous study, different quantities of both polymer and monomer sodium silicate were investigated for their capacity to diminish the severity of miniature rose powdery mildew disease [84]. The results presented indicate that Si may regulate gene expression in plants, particularly under stress conditions, and that this interaction is critical for improving plant resilience and growth.

9. Role of Silicon in Biotic and Abiotic Stress Tolerance

The vital roles of Si that participated in biotic and abiotic stress tolerance are summarized in Figure 1.

9.1. Abiotic Stress

Abiotic stresses have decreased the productivity of several crops by more than 50% [85,86,87]. Vital processes within the plant such as respiration, the transport of photosynthesis products, photosynthesis, the absorption of elements, the opening and closing of stomata, and seed germination are affected by several stresses such as drought [88,89,90], salinity [91,92], heavy metals [93], and low temperature [94]. Silicon has been demonstrated to alleviate abiotic stresses in plants by promoting photosynthesis at different levels, such as maintaining or improving limits in net assimilation rates compared to stressed plants not provided with Si [16,52,95]. The utilization of Si has been demonstrated to enhance photosynthetic rate, leaf and root water potential, and water use efficiency, while decreasing transpiration rate and membrane permeability under drought stress conditions in varied species [64,65,69]. Reports indicate that Si can affect the activities of enzymes directly engaged in photosynthesis, such as ribulose-bisphosphate (RuBP) carboxylase-oxygenase, which is considerably enhanced by Si supply [96,97,98,99]. Furthermore, Si was connected to boosting leaf rigidity and erectness, resulting in enhanced photosynthesis [16]. These findings highlight silicon’s ability to boost photosynthetic efficacy while mitigating the negative impacts of stress on plant growth and development.

9.1.1. Drought

Drought is considered one of the most dangerous types of stress affecting the environmental balance and agricultural systems, as drought reduces the rates of photosynthesis, which ultimately affects the growth and productivity of M&APs [100,101]. Silicon protects plants against drought stress through various mechanisms such as regulating the action of the aquaporin gene; enhancing the accumulation of soluble sugars and/or amino acids in the wood sap, which increases the osmotic driving force; or activating the transfer of potassium to the wood sap via the SKOR (Stelar K+ Outward Rectifier) gene. Additionally, it is also possible for silicon to improve the hydraulic conductivity of the roots by modifying root growth and increasing the root/shoot ratio along with raising the activity of aquaporin and the osmotic driving force, which improves water absorption under water deficiency or drought conditions [67,102]. Exogenous application with Si improved seed germination under drought stress and protected young seedlings from oxidative stress by improving antioxidant defense. The application of calcium silicate also improves maize seed germination under drought stress [103,104]. The application of silicon increases the rate of photosynthesis and water use efficiency and improves osmotic potential while reducing the rate of transpiration and membrane permeability under drought stress conditions in several plants such as fennel [105], Kentucky bluegrass [88], oil palm [106], and white lupine [107]. One of the main effects of drought stress is to reduce the absorption of essential elements [108]. In this regard, it was found that the application of silicon increases the rate of absorption of macro-elements (P, K, Ca, and Mg) and micro-elements (Fe, Cu, and Mn) under drought stress [108]. Otherwise, the phosphorus and potassium contents in rice straw were markedly increased due to Si treatment under water deficit conditions compared to untreated plants [109]. It was also noted that applying Si under drought stress helps regulate gaseous exchange attributes [106,110]. It has also been reported that Si reduces oxidative stress by activating antioxidant enzymes (SOD, APX, CAT, and POD) under conditions of water deficiency stress in many plants like sunflower [108], tomato [56], and chickpea [71]. Moreover, Si treatment activates the expression of drought-tolerance genes in rice plants [111].

9.1.2. Salinity

Recently, soil salinity has limited the production of agricultural crops, leading to a severe shortage in food production at the industrial and commercial levels [92,112]. Globally, 6% of agricultural lands are classified as saline, and this percentage is expected to increase by 2050 due to accelerating climate change, which will increase the challenges facing global food production [16,113]. Actually, Si reduces the adverse impacts of salt stress through various mechanisms. The basic mechanisms of Si that participate in salt stress alleviation are maintaining the water balance within the plant, increasing the absorption and assimilation of elements, regulating the biosynthesis of compatible plant hormones and solutes, reducing oxidative stress, modifying gas exchange, modifying gene expression, and reducing sodium absorption and accumulation. It has been widely confirmed that treatment with silicon reduces sodium absorption and increases the potassium-to-sodium ratio under conditions of salt stress [103,114,115]. Salt stress leads to severe nutritional disorders within the plant [103,116]. It has been reported that applying silicon increases the calcium and magnesium content of leaves and roots in tomato plants under salt stress [117]. It also increases potassium, calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium in Egyptian clover [118]. The Si treatment also increases the rate of photosynthesis, the water-use efficiency, the hydraulic conductivity of the roots, and the size and number of stomata in wheat [114], faba bean [119], sorghum leaves [120], wheat [121], rice [122], okra [123], sweet pepper [124], and maize [125]. The application of silicon reduces the oxidative damage that occurs to plants under conditions of salt stress by increasing the activity of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, POD, GSH, and APX), maintaining the fluidity of the plasma membranes in their optimal state, and reducing the generation of ROS [126,127]. The application of silicon can also enhance the plants’ tolerance to salt stress by controlling the levels of dissolved organic acids such as proline and glycine and total free amino acids in the leaf and root tissues of okra [123]. It also regulates the level of phytohormones such as gibberellin (GA) and reduces the level of abscisic acid (ABA) in soybean plants under conditions of salt stress [79]. Silicon regulates the gene expression of AQP in addition to improving water absorption in cucumber plants exposed to salt stress [128]. Moreover, the application of Si activates genes related to salt tolerance (leDREB-1, leDREB-2, and leDREB-3) in tomato plants under salinity stress [127].

9.1.3. Heavy Metals

Heavy metals, whether in the soil or reaching agricultural crops through irrigation water, greatly affect soil dynamics [12,129]. Mechanisms for mitigating the effects of stress with heavy elements in plants were investigated under Si application. It was found that Si reduces the concentration of heavy elements inside the plant by activating antioxidant enzymes and chelating and dividing the metals into inactive parts [130]. In this context, Si application reduced the accumulation of cadmium inside the rice plant by fragmenting cadmium in the root cell walls [131] and modifying gene expression and structural modifications in various plant parts [132]. Furthermore, soil application with Si reduces the transfer of heavy metals by raising the pH of the soil or binding these metals in the form of silica complexes [133]. The role of silicon in alleviating the harmful effects of heavy metals such as silver and manganese in many species such as pumpkin, sorghum, and soybeans [134] has been reported via reducing LPO density and improving the enzymatic and non-enzymatic (ascorbate and glutathione) antioxidant system [135]. It has also been found that Si application reduces the oxidative stress caused by arsenic contamination by reducing arsenic accumulation and enhancing the antioxidant system in the rice plant [136]. The silicon treatment of bean seeds exposed to cadmium and lead stress led to significant increases in the germination rate and relative water content compared to untreated plants [137]. The application of Si reduces the absorption and transport of heavy metals in the tissues of rice exposed to cadmium stress [70,138]. Otherwise, Si application significantly increases the regulation of the expression of genes responsible for silicon transport (OsLSi1 and OsLSi2) and regulates the expression of genes encoding heavy metal transporters (OsHMA2 and OsHMA3) in rice plants [80,139]. The treatment of Si increases the thickness of the epidermis, xylem diameter mesophyll, and the transverse area of collenchymas and the middle vein, which enhances the cells’ tolerance to cadmium and Zn stress [140]. The application of silicon increases the value of (Soil–Plant Analyses Development) water use efficiency, transpiration rate, chlorophyll efficiency, and net photosynthesis rate in barley plants under conditions of chromium toxicity [141]. It was also confirmed that the application of silicon enhances the gas exchange properties in barley under chromium stress [141], in cotton under lead stress [142], in peanuts under aluminum stress [143], and in rice under zinc stress [82]. In hydroponic solutions, Si application also led to an increase in the absorption and transfer of macro- and micro-nutrients under chromium, copper, and cadmium stresses [144,145]. In addition, Si treatment inhibits the absorption of zinc and its accumulation in the leaves and roots of maize and cotton [146,147].

9.1.4. Ultraviolet

Silicon also plays an important role in protecting plants from the danger of ultraviolet radiation by enhancing growth, improving the rate of photosynthesis, and activating antioxidants in soybean seedlings [148]. Silicon also increases the tolerance of wheat seedlings to ultraviolet radiation by improving the level of antioxidant compounds [149]. Under ultraviolet radiation stress, the application of Si also markedly improved the antioxidant machinery in corn relative to the control [150].

9.2. Biotic Stress

9.2.1. Physiological Effects of Silicon on Plants

Silicon accumulates in plant tissues, primarily in the form of silicon dioxide (SiO2), which forms a physical barrier on the plant’s surface. This barrier acts as a protective shield against several pathogens, including fungi, bacteria, and viruses. It makes it difficult for pathogens to penetrate the plant’s epidermal cells and gain entry and also makes it more difficult for sucking insects and nematodes to penetrate plant cell walls with their stylets and for chewing insects to feed on plant tissue [151,152,153]. In a study aimed at enhancing rice resistance to blast disease, Kim et al. [154] observed the increase in silicon layers in the epidermis underneath the cuticle, in the middle lamella, on stomatal guard cells, and in the intercellular spaces in silicon-treated plants. This is considered evidence that silicon induces cell wall fortification. Additionally, the increased Si in rice biomass was accompanied by an increase in lignin, cellulose, and hemicelluloses [155]. The Si deposition enhances the strength and thickness of cell walls, making them more resistant to pathogen penetration and therefore reducing the chances of infection by pathogens. Mehrabanjoubani et al. [156] proved that the application of silicon under excess Fe nutrition can increase the root tip thickness and lignification of rice plants. Silicon application to plants stimulates antioxidant defense systems including enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants and activates the genes responsible for stress defense [157]. Thus, Si treatment was proven to improve plant stress tolerance through several strategies such as controlling ROS production, decreasing malondialdehyde (MDA) content and ion leakage, and preventing the absorption of Na and other toxic ions [60]. Moreover, Si application interacted with salicylic acid and reduced the adverse impact of boron toxicity in peas and improved the growth and development via alleviating the oxidative damage, therefore maintaining the cell membrane integrity [158]
The accumulation of Si in plants depends on the plant’s ability to continue absorbing silicon once the silicification process begins in older tissues. Additionally, Si-accumulator plants such as barley, wheat, and rice continue absorbing Si after the initial stages of silicification; hence, plant shoots contain more silicon than roots [159]. Contrarily, roots contained higher Si levels than shoots in non-silicon-accumulator plants [160].

9.2.2. Effects of Silicon on Plant–Pathogen Interactions and Field Applications

Plant resistance to diseases caused by fungi, bacteria, viruses, and other disease causal agents has been enhanced in different species by Si application. There are several methods for Si application to control diseases caused by pathogens, such as spraying, soaking seeds, or soil application. The choice of the best application method depends on the plant species, the type of disease, and the optimal plant growth stage. In this context, the lesions caused by Colletotrichum spp. were reduced by 80–87% and disease was decreased by 87–89% in tomatoes due to soil application with silicon compared to the untreated plants [161]. Interestingly, it was reported that Si acts as a physical barrier on the plant surface that blocks the fungus from invading plant cells; therefore, Si-treated plants showed a higher number of fungal appressoria as infection signs of plant obstruction. The foliar application of Si effectively controlled leaf blast disease in rice compared to soil application. Additionally, Si treatment was more effective on the race-specific resistance against Pyricularia grisea when it was applied at the vegetative growth stage. Moreover, it caused a 100% suppression in all tested races of blast disease and was more effective than edifenphos (a fungicide used to control Anthracnose disease), and this effect was attributed to the increase in both silica deposits and the activities of defensive enzymes (Kim et al., 2002) [154]. Furthermore, soil or foliar application of Si increased its concentration in rice plants and significantly reduced the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) and disease index caused by blast disease [162]. Treatment with Si markedly reduced Fusarium wilt disease (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense) in banana by approximately 30–40%; foliar application was more effective than soil application. Such an effect was attributed to the inhibition of mycelial growth and spore production [162]. Silicon also helps plants tolerate attacks from sucking insects such as aphids, whiteflies, planthoppers, leafhoppers, thrips, and mites and chewing insects such as caterpillars, beetles, locusts, and grasshoppers. This effect is attributed to the physical barrier formed by silica deposition that prevents insects from penetrating the plant’s epidermal tissue. The other reasons for such effects are inducing morphological changes in trichomes and leaf tissues that inhibit the feeding process and movement of insects on the surface of plant tissues, as well as inducing toxicity in the insect body once ingested [163].
Silicon has also been proven to induce systemic resistance in plants against various pathogens. Systemic resistance can be defined as an increase in a plant’s ability to defend itself against pathogens (biotrophic or necrotrophic) after infection by a pathogen or treatment with chemical agents [164]. Gene resistance in plants is caused by the induction of the expression of pathogenesis-related proteins or the expression of genes related to the synthesis of phytoalexins [28]. Reports revealed that Si application increased the resistance of plants to diseases caused by bacteria, fungi, and viruses in several species such as rice [164,165] and cucumber [166]. The resistance to powdery mildew disease caused by Erysiphe cichoracearum in Arabidopsis has been increased due to Si application [167]. Foliar spray with a 2% solution of potassium silicate (K2SiO3) once every 2–3 weeks effectively controls blast disease in rice [154]. The most effective application method of Si to control leaf diseases caused by Colletotrichum spp. in tomatoes is foliar spray at the growth and flowering stages [159]. Actually, the mechanism of resistance induction by silicon in plants is not yet fully understood, but it is assumed that silicon stimulates the expression of pathogenesis-related PR proteins, increases the synthesis of phytoalexins, and induces a defense response mediated by jasmonic acid and ethylene.

10. Vital Roles of Silicon on Alleviating Abiotic and Biotic Stresses in M&APs

Silicon has been shown to effectively increase the tolerance of plants to various abiotic and biotic stresses, a role that has also been confirmed in several M&APs. For instance, the application of silicon has been found to improve the growth and productivity of borage (Borago officinalis) under salt-stress conditions. Such an effect was attributed to the role of Si in stabilizing the cell plasma membrane, preventing its deterioration, and therefore reducing the absorption of sodium ions. It also activates enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants, thus enhancing the tolerance to salt stress [168]. Similarly, the performance of Lonicera japonica L. plants under salt stress has been improved due to Si application via enhancing photosynthesis, antioxidant systems, and reducing sodium ion absorption [169]. The treatment of Si successfully alleviated the negative impacts of salt stress in Licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra) via improving the gas exchange, photosynthesis rate, chlorophyll content, and antioxidant defense systems. Further, it reduced the accumulation of sodium ions and increased total sugars, glutamine synthetase, and nitrate reductase enzymes’ activity, as well as the total nitrogen in plant tissues [170]. Silicon application also enhanced the morphological characteristics of licorice leaves, increasing water content, vascular bundle conductivity, palisade tissue size, chlorophyll content, and photosynthesis efficiency, thereby enhancing plant growth and development under salt-stress conditions [171,172]. Additionally, Si treatment in Satureja hortensis plants exposed to salt stress markedly increased the relative water content, chlorophyll content, essential oil yield, and K/Na ratio and enhanced the antioxidant machinery. It also reduced the levels of reactive oxygen species such as hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde compared to untreated plants [173]. The application of silicon nanoparticles considerably improved the growth of basil under salt-stress conditions accompanied by increasing the leaf chlorophyll content and proline level, indicating enhanced tolerance to salt stress [174].
Similarly, Si application has been beneficial in alleviating drought stress in M&APs. In this concern, Si treatment improved the growth of Damask rose (Rosa damascena) and enhanced the content of active ingredients in essential oils such as geraniol and citronellol. It also enhanced chlorophyll content, Rubisco enzyme activity, and photosynthesis efficiency [175]. Otherwise, the adverse effects of drought on young eucalyptus seedlings were alleviated due to Si treatment by preventing the decrease in chlorophyll, reducing oxidative stress by increasing the activity of guaiacol peroxidase and superoxide dismutase enzymes, improving the water use efficiency, reducing the transpiration rate, and enhancing osmotic regulation [66]. Additionally, Si treatment has been shown to reduce damage resulting from heavy metal toxicity. For example, Si application effectively reduced copper toxicity in Arabidopsis thaliana by modifying the genetic expression of the COPT1 gene responsible for copper transport, leading to improved plant growth and enhanced copper stress tolerance [176]. Furthermore, even in normal conditions, the exogenous application of silicon has been found to improve the vegetative growth, flower production, and quality of Narcissus tazetta L. [177].
In terms of biotic stress, silicon treatment has shown effective roles in combating insect pests and pathogens in several plant species, including M&APs. In this context, Si application reduced the sensitivity of plants to leafhoppers and both stem and leaf borers by acting as a physical barrier under the epidermis of the leaves, preventing the penetration of insects and fungi. It also enhances plant resistance to pathogens by increasing the production of lignin, phytoalexins, and phenols [178]. Additionally, the resistance of rose plants to powdery mildew has been improved due to silicon treatment [84]. The defense system against infection with the Botrytis fungus in Arabidopsis was markedly enhanced due to Si application via improving the gene expression of the PDF1 gene [179]. The vital roles of silicon on alleviating abiotic and biotic stresses in M&APs have been summarized in Table 1 and Table 2.

11. Conclusions and Perspectives

This review highlights the pivotal role of silicon in enhancing plant tolerance to a wide range of abiotic and biotic stresses. The findings from numerous studies demonstrate that silicon application can significantly mitigate the adverse effects of drought, salinity, heavy metal toxicity, and pathogen/pest attacks in plants, including medicinally important species. The mechanisms by which silicon confers stress tolerance are multifaceted, involving the regulation of antioxidant systems, water relations, nutrient homeostasis, phytohormone signaling, and the expression of stress-responsive genes. Moreover, the deposition of silicon in cell walls provides physical reinforcement and acts as a barrier against pathogen invasion and insect herbivory.
Notably, several studies on medicinal plants, such as borage, honeysuckle, licorice, Damask rose, savory, basil, and eucalyptus, have shown that silicon supplementation can effectively alleviate stress-induced damage and enhance the production of valuable secondary metabolites and essential oils. These findings underscore the potential of silicon fertilization as a sustainable strategy to improve the productivity and quality of medicinal crops under changing environmental conditions. While the beneficial effects of silicon are well-documented, further research is warranted to fully elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying silicon-mediated stress tolerance. Elucidating the intricate signaling pathways and gene regulatory networks involved in silicon-induced stress responses could pave the way for the development of more targeted and efficient approaches for enhancing plant resilience. Additionally, field trials and practical applications of silicon fertilizers in medicinal plant cultivation should be explored to validate the findings from controlled experiments and facilitate the adoption of this promising strategy in sustainable agriculture.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.M.H., A.N.A., M.A.A.A. and M.E.; validation, K.M.H., R.A., A.N.A., M.A.A.A. and M.E.; investigation, K.M.H., R.A., A.N.A., I.F.H., F.A.S.H., S.M.A.-E. and M.E.; resources, K.M.H., R.A., A.N.A., M.A.A.A., I.F.H., F.A.S.H., S.M.A.-E. and M.E.; writing—original draft preparation, K.M.H., R.A., A.N.A., M.A.A.A., I.F.H., F.A.S.H., S.M.A.-E. and M.E.; writing—review and editing, K.M.H., R.A., A.N.A., M.A.A.A., I.F.H., F.A.S.H., S.M.A.-E. and M.E.; visualization, A.N.A., M.A.A.A., I.F.H., F.A.S.H., S.M.A.-E. and M.E.; supervision, K.M.H., R.A., I.F.H., F.A.S.H., S.M.A.-E. and M.E.; project administration, K.M.H., R.A., I.F.H., F.A.S.H. and S.M.A.-E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. De Silva, T. Industrial utilization of medicinal plants in developing countries. In Medicinal Plants for Forest Conservation and Health Care; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1997; pp. 34–44. [Google Scholar]
  2. Husen, A. Herbs, Shrubs and Trees of Potential Medicinal Benefits; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Prajapati, N.D.; Purohit, S.S.; Sharma, A.K.; Kumar, T. A Handbook of Medicinal Plants; Agribios: Rajasthan, India, 2003; p. 553. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rahman, S.; Iqbal, M.; Husen, A. Medicinal Plants and Abiotic Stress: An Overview. In Medicinal Plants; Husen, A., Iqbal, M., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Schippmann, U.; Leaman, D.J.; Cunnningham, A.B. Impact of cultivation and gathering of medicinal plants on biodiversity: Global trends and issues. In Biodiversity and the Ecosystem Approach in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries; Ninth Regular Session of the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture: Rome, Italy; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2002; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  6. Williamson, E.M. Drug interactions between herbal and prescription medicines. Drug Saf. 2003, 26, 1075–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kennedy, J. Herb and supplement use in the US adult population. Clin. Ther. 2005, 27, 1847–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. El-Sayed, S.M.; Hassan, K.M.; Abdelhamid, A.N.; Yousef, E.E.; Abdellatif, Y.M.R.; Abu-Hussien, S.H.; Nasser, M.A.; Elshalakany, W.A.; Darwish, D.B.E.; Abdulmajeed, A.M.; et al. Exogenous paclobutrazol reinforces the antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of lavender (Lavandula officinalis) oil through modulating its composition of oxygenated terpenes. Plants 2022, 11, 1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. El-Beltagi, H.S.; El-Sayed, S.M.; Abdelhamid, A.N.; Hassan, K.M.; Elshalakany, W.A.; Nossier, M.I.; Alabdallah, N.M.; Al-Harbi, N.A.; Al-Qahtani, S.M.; Darwish, D.B.E.; et al. Potentiating biosynthesis of alkaloids and polyphenolic substances in Catharanthus roseus plant using κ-Carrageenan. Molecules 2023, 28, 3642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hassan, F.A.S.; Ali, E.F.; Mostafa, N.Y.; Mazrou, R. Shelf-life extension of sweet basil leaves by edible coating with thyme volatile oil encapsulated chitosan nanoparticles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 177, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Cooke, J.; Leishman, M.R. Consistent alleviation of abiotic stress with silicon addition: A meta-analysis. Funct. Ecol. 2016, 30, 1340–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Raza, A.; Tabassum, J.; Zahid, Z.; Charagh, S.; Bashir, S.; Barmukh, R.; Khan, R.S.A.; Barbosa, F., Jr.; Zhang, C.; Chen, H.; et al. Advances in “Omics” Approaches for Improving Toxic Metals/Metalloids Tolerance in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 12, 794373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Daryanto, S.; Wang, L.; Jacinthe, P.-A. Global synthesis of drought effects on maize and wheat production. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0156362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Arya, A.K.; Durgapal, M.; Bachheti, A.; Deepti; Joshi, K.K.; Gonfa, Y.H.; Bachheti, R.K.; Husen, A. Ethnomedicinal use, phytochemistry, and other potential application of aquatic and semiaquatic medicinal plants. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2022, 2022, 4931556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Del Buono, D. Can biostimulants be used to mitigate the effect of anthropogenic climate change on agriculture? It is time to respond. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 751, 141763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mir, R.A.; Bhat, B.A.; Yousuf, H.; Islam, S.T.; Raza, A.; Rizvi, M.A.; Charagh, S.; Albaqami, M.; Sofi, P.A.; Zargar, S.M. Multidimensional role of silicon to activate resilient plant growth and to mitigate abiotic stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 819658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zargar, S.M.; Macha, M.A.; Nazir, M.; Agrawal, G.K.; Rakwal, R. Silicon: A multitalented micronutrient in OMICS per-spective—Anupdate. Curr. Proteom. 2012, 9, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pavlovic, J.; Kostic, L.; Bosnic, P.; Kirkby, E.A.; Nikolic, M. Interactions of Silicon with Essential and Beneficial Elements in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 697592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Richmond, K.E.; Sussman, M. Got silicon? The non-essential beneficial plant nutrient. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6, 268–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, J.F. Role of silicon in enhancing the resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2004, 50, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guntzer, F.; Keller, C.; Meunier, J.-D. Benefits of plant silicon for crops: A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 32, 201–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Van Bockhaven, J.; De Vleesschauwer, D.; Höfte, M. Towards establishing broad spectrum disease resistance in plants: Silicon leads the way. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 1281–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bhardwaj, S.; Sharma, D.; Singh, S.; Ramamurthy, P.C.; Verma, T.; Pujari, M.; Singh, J.; Kapoor, D.; Prasad, R. Physiological and molecular insights into the role of silicon in improving plant performance under abiotic stresses. Plant Soil 2023, 486, 25–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Arnon, D.I.; Stout, P.R. The essentiality of certain elements in minute quantity for plants with special reference to copper. Plant Physiol. 1939, 14, 371–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liang, Y.; Nikolic, M.; Bélanger, R.; Gong, H.; Song, A. Silicon in Agriculture: From Theory to Practice; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Marxen, A.; Klotzbücher, T.; Jahn, R.; Kaiser, K.; Nguyen, V.S.; Schmidt, A.; Schädler, M.; Vetterlein, D. Interaction between silicon cycling and straw decomposition in a silicon deficient rice production system. Plant Soil 2015, 398, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fawe, A.; Abou-Zaid, M.; Menzies, J.G.; Bélanger, R.R. Silicon-Mediated Accumulation of Flavonoid Phytoalexins in Cucumber. Phytopathology 1998, 88, 396–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rodrigues, F.; McNally, D.J.; Datnoff, L.E.; Jones, J.B.; Labbé, C.; Benhamou, N.; Menzies, J.G.; Bélanger, R.R. Silicon enhances the accumulation of diterpenoid phytoalexins in rice: A potential mechanism for blast resistance. Phytopathology 2004, 94, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Miyake, Y.; Takahashi, E. Effect of silicon on the growth of solution-cultured cucumber plants, Part 17. Comparative studies on silica nutrition in plants. Jpn. J.Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1983, 53, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Datnoff, L.; Deren, C.; Snyder, G. Silicon fertilization for disease management of rice in Florida. Crop. Prot. 1997, 16, 525–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vasanthi, N.; Saleena, L.M.; Raj, S.A. Silicon in day today life. World Appl. Sci. J. 2012, 17, 1425–1440. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ali, E.F.; Hassan, F. Supplemental effects of silicon nutrition on growth, quality and some physiological characters of potted chrysanthemum grown in greenhouse. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Culs. 2016, 15, 85–98. [Google Scholar]
  33. Jeong, K.-J.; Chon, Y.-S.; Ha, S.-H.; Kang, H.-K.; Yun, J.-G. Silicon application on standard chrysanthemum alleviates damages induced by disease and aphid insect. J. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 2012, 30, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Soundararajan, P.; Sivanesan, I.; Jana, S.; Jeong, B.R. Influence of silicon supplementation on the growth and tolerance to high temperature in Salvia splendens. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2014, 55, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Thakral, V.; Bhat, J.A.; Kumar, N.; Myaka, B.; Sudhakaran, S.; Patil, G.; Sonah, H.; Shivaraj, S.M.; Deshmukh, R. Role of silicon under contrasting biotic and abiotic stress conditions provides benefits for climate smart cropping. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 189, 104545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Muslim, D.A.; Al-Shareefi, M.J.; Mahmoud, S.S. Effect of Salicylic Acid and Nano Silicon on the Morphological Traits of Potato Shoot Grown In Vitro Under Salt Stress. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2023; Volume 1158, p. 102005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Saitoh, Y.; Suga, M. Structure and function of a silicic acid channel Lsi1. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 982068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Epstein, E. The anomaly of silicon in plant biology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ma, J.F.; Yamaji, N. Silicon uptake and accumulation in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11, 392–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, R.; Sun, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, H. Advances in Understanding Silicon Transporters and the Benefits to Silicon-Associated Disease Resistance in Plants. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ayub, M.A.; Abbas, M.; ur Rehman, M.Z. Role of inorganic bio stimulant elements in plant growth. In Sustainable Plant Nutrition; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2023; pp. 229–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rafi, M.M.; Epstein, E.; Falk, R.H. Silicon deprivation causes physical abnormalities in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). J. Plant Physiol. 1997, 151, 497–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ma, J.F.; Yamaji, N.; Mitani, N.; Tamai, K.; Konishi, S.; Fujiwara, T.; Katsuhara, M.; Yano, M. An efflux transporter of silicon in rice. Nature 2007, 448, 209–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Irfan, M.; Maqsood, M.A.; Rehman, H.U.; Mahboob, W.; Sarwar, N.; Hafeez, O.B.A.; Hussain, S.; Ercisli, S.; Akhtar, M.; Aziz, T. Silicon nutrition in plants under water-deficit conditions: Overview and prospects. Water 2023, 15, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Klotz, M.; Schaller, J.; Engelbrecht, B.M.J. Effects of plant-available soil silicon on seedling growth and foliar nutrient status across tropical tree species. Oikos 2023, 2023, e10030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sah, S.K.; Reddy, K.R.; Li, J. Silicon Enhances Plant Vegetative Growth and Soil Water Retention of Soybean (Glycine max) Plants under Water-Limiting Conditions. Plants 2022, 11, 1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, Z.; Liu, Z.; Yue, Z.; Wang, J.; Jin, L.; Xu, Z.; Jin, N.; Zhang, B.; Lyu, J.; Yu, J. Application of Exogenous Silicon for Alleviating Photosynthetic Inhibition in Tomato Seedlings under Low−Calcium Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhu, Y.; Gong, H. Beneficial effects of silicon on salt and drought tolerance in plants. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2013, 34, 455–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kumari, P.; Sharma, R.; Panwar, S.; Paul, S.; Banyal, N. Silicon as vital element in flower crop production. J. Plant Nutr. 2023, 46, 2747–2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Orzoł, A.; Cruzado-Tafur, E.; Gołębiowski, A.; Rogowska, A.; Pomastowski, P.; Górecki, R.J.; Buszewski, B.; Szultka-Młyńska, M.; Głowacka, K. Comprehensive Study of Si-Based Compounds in Selected Plants (Pisum sativum L., Medicago sativa L., Triticum aestivum L.). Molecules 2023, 28, 4311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Munir, F.D.A.; Sulaiman, Z.; Ahmad, K.; Samad, M.Y.A.; Ariffin, M.R.; Salisu, M.A. A Comprehensive Review on the Potential Effect of Silicon Fertilizer and its Significance for Agriculture. Int. Cent. Res. Resour. Dev. (ICRRD) Qual. Index Res. J. 2023, 4, 149–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xu, R.; Huang, J.; Guo, H.; Wang, C.; Zhan, H. Functions of silicon and phytolith in higher plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2023, 18, 2198848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Grankina, A.; Bocharnikova, E.; Matichenkov, V. Silicon-based Biostimulators. Biostimulants Crop Prod. Sustain. Agric. 2022, 14, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. da Silva, A.P.R.; da Silva, L.J.R.; Deus, A.C.F.; Fernandes, D.M.; Büll, L.T. Silicon application methods influence the nutrient uptake of maize plants in tropical soil. Silicon 2023, 15, 7327–7334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Lv, P.; Mi, J.; Zhao, B. Silicon improves the photosynthetic performance of oat leaves infected with Puccinia graminis f. sp. avenae. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1037136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Shi, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yao, H.; Wu, J.; Sun, H.; Gong, H. Silicon improves seed germination and alleviates oxidative stress of bud seedlings in tomato under water deficit stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 78, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Sayed, E.G.; Mahmoud, A.W.M.; El-Mogy, M.M.; Ali, M.A.A.; Fahmy, M.A.M.; Tawfic, G.A. The effective role of nano-silicon application in improving productivity and quality of grafted tomato grown under salinity stress. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gechev, T.; Petrov, V. Reactive oxygen species and abiotic stress in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kim, Y.-H.; Khan, A.L.; Waqas, M.; Lee, I.-J. Silicon regulates antioxidant activities of crop plants under abiotic-induced oxidative stress: A review. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 256717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Akhter, M.S.; Noreen, S.; Ummara, U.; Aqeel, M.; Saleem, N.; Ahmed, M.M.; Mahmood, S.; Athar, H.-U.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Kaushik, P.; et al. Silicon-induced mitigation of NaCl stress in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), associated with enhanced enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant activities. Plants 2022, 11, 2379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Teixeira, G.C.M.; de Prado, R.M.; Rocha, A.M.S.; Filho, A.S.B.d.O.; Junior, G.S.d.S.; Gratão, P.L. Action of silicon on the activity of antioxidant enzymes and on physiological mechanisms mitigates water deficit in sugarcane and energy cane plants. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 17487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Machado, J.; Fernandes, A.P.G.; Bokor, B.; Vaculík, M.; Heuvelink, E.; Carvalho, S.M.P.; Vasconcelos, M.W. The effect of silicon on the antioxidant system of tomato seedlings exposed to individual and combined nitrogen and water deficit. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2024, 184, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ahsan, M.; Valipour, M.; Nawaz, F.; Raheel, M.; Abbas, H.T.; Sajid, M.; Manan, A.; Kanwal, S.; Mahmoud, E.A.; Casini, R.; et al. Evaluation of Silicon Supplementation for Drought Stress under Water-Deficit Conditions: An Application of Sustainable Agriculture. Agronomy 2023, 13, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ishaq, H.; Waraich, E.A.; Hussain, S.; Ahmad, M.; Ahmad, Z.; Saifullah. Silicon-mediated growth, physiological, biochemical and root alterations to confer drought and nickel stress tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.). Silicon 2023, 15, 6579–6589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ning, D.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Qin, A.; Huang, C.; Fu, Y.; Gao, Y.; Duan, A. The Effects of Foliar Supplementation of Silicon on Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Winter Wheat to Drought Stress during Different Growth Stages. Plants 2023, 12, 2386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Barbosa, M.P.; Cairo, P.A.R.; do Bonfim, R.A.A.; da Silva, L.D.; Sá, M.C.; Almeida, M.F.; de Oliveira, L.S.; da Paz Brito, S.; Gomes, F.P. Effects of Foliar and Root Silicon Application on Mitigating Water Decit Stress in Young Eucalyptus Urophylla Plants; Research Square Platform LLC: Durham, NC, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chen, D.; Cao, B.; Wang, S.; Liu, P.; Deng, X.; Yin, L.; Zhang, S. Silicon moderated the K deficiency by improving the plant-water status in sorghum. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Khan, A.; Khan, A.L.; Muneer, S.; Kim, Y.-H.; Al-Rawahi, A.; Al-Harrasi, A. Silicon and Salinity: Crosstalk in Crop-Mediated Stress Tolerance Mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Verma, K.K.; Song, X.-P.; Zeng, Y.; Li, D.-M.; Guo, D.-J.; Rajput, V.D.; Chen, G.-L.; Barakhov, A.; Minkina, T.M.; Li, Y.-R. Characteristics of Leaf Stomata and Their Relationship with Photosynthesis in Saccharum officinarum under Drought and Silicon Application. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 24145–24153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Shi, Q.; Bao, Z.; Zhu, Z.; He, Y.; Qian, Q.; Yu, J. Silicon-mediated alleviation of Mn toxicity in Cucumis sativus in relation to activities of superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 1551–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gunes, A.; Inal, A.; Bagci, E.G.; Pilbeam, D.J. Silicon-mediated changes of some physiological and enzymatic parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress in spinach and tomato grown in sodic-B toxic soil. Plant Soil 2007, 290, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Verma, K.K.; Song, X.P.; Chen, Z.L.; Tian, D.D.; Rajput, V.D.; Singh, M.; Minkina, T.; Li, Y.R. Silicon and nanosilicon mit-igate nutrient deficiency under stress for sustainable crop improvement. In Silicon and Nano-Silicon in Environmental Stress Management and Crop Quality Improvement: Progress and Prospects; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; Volume 1, pp. 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, Y.; Stass, A.; Horst, W.J. Apoplastic binding of aluminum is involved in silicon-induced amelioration of aluminum toxicity in maize. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136, 3762–3770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sarwar, N.; Saifullah; Malhi, S.S.; Zia, M.H.; Naeem, A.; Bibi, S.; Farid, G. Role of mineral nutrition in minimizing cadmium accumulation by plants. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2010, 90, 925–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Flam-Shepherd, R.; Huynh, W.Q.; Coskun, D.; Hamam, A.M.; Britto, D.T.; Kronzucker, H.J. Membrane fluxes, bypass flows, and sodium stress in rice: The influence of silicon. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 1679–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Gong, H.J.; Randall, D.P.; Flowers, T.J. Silicon deposition in the root reduces sodium uptake in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings by reducing bypass flow. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29, 1970–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Liang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Chen, Q.; Liu, Y.; Ding, R. Effect of exogenous silicon (Si) on H+-ATPase activity, phospholipids and fluidity of plasma membrane in leaves of salt-stressed barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Markovich, O.; Steiner, E.; Kouřil, Š.; Tarkowski, P.; Aharoni, A.; Elbaum, R. Silicon promotes cytokinin biosynthesis and delays senescence in Arabidopsis and Sorghum. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 1189–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lee, S.K.; Sohn, E.Y.; Hamayun, M.; Yoon, J.Y.; Lee, I.J. Effect of silicon on growth and salinity stress of soybean plant grown under hydroponic system. Agrofor. Syst. 2010, 80, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kim, Y.-H.; Khan, A.L.; Waqas, M.; Jeong, H.-J.; Kim, D.-H.; Shin, J.S.; Kim, J.-G.; Yeon, M.-H.; Lee, I.-J. Regulation of jasmonic acid biosynthesis by silicon application during physical injury to Oryza sativa L. J. Plant Res. 2014, 127, 525–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jiang, H.; Song, Z.; Su, Q.-W.; Wei, Z.-H.; Li, W.-C.; Jiang, Z.-X.; Tian, P.; Wang, Z.-H.; Yang, X.; Yang, M.-Y.; et al. Transcriptomic and metabolomic reveals silicon enhances adaptation of rice under dry cultivation by improving flavonoid biosynthesis, osmoregulation, and photosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 967537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Song, A.; Li, P.; Fan, F.; Li, Z.; Liang, Y. The Effect of silicon on photosynthesis and expression of its relevant genes in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under high-zinc stress. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e113782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ghareeb, H.; Bozsó, Z.; Ott, P.G.; Repenning, C.; Stahl, F.; Wydra, K. Transcriptome of silicon-induced resistance against Ralstonia solanacearum in the silicon non-accumulator tomato implicates priming effect. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2011, 75, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Elsharkawy, M.M.; Tatsuya, H.; Masafumi, S.; Mitsuro, H. Suppressive effects of a polymer sodium silicate solution on powdery mildew and root rot diseases of miniature rose. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 14, 2917–2927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hassan, F.; Ali, E.F. Effects of salt stress on growth, antioxidant enzyme activity and some other physiological parameters in jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis (Link) Schneider) plant. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2014, 8, 1615–1624. [Google Scholar]
  86. Hassan, F.; Al-Yasi, H.; Ali, E.F.; Alamer, K.; Hessini, K.; Attia, H.; El-Shazly, S. Mitigation of salt-stress effects by moringa leaf extract or salicylic acid through motivating antioxidant machinery in damask rose. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2021, 101, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ali, M.A.A.; Nasser, M.A.; Abdelhamid, A.N.; Ali, I.A.A.; Saudy, H.S.; Hassan, K.M. Melatonin as a Key Factor for Regulating and Relieving Abiotic Stresses in Harmony with Phytohormones in Horticultural Plants—A Review. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2023, 24, 54–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Saud, S.; Li, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, L.; Fahad, S.; Hussain, S.; Sadiq, A.; Chen, Y. Silicon application increases drought tolerance of kentucky bluegrass by improving plant water relations and morphophysiological functions. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 368694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hessini, K.; Wasli, H.; Al-Yasi, H.M.; Ali, E.F.; Issa, A.A.; Hassan, F.A.S.; Siddique, K.H.M. Graded moisture deficit effect on secondary metabolites, antioxidant, and inhibitory enzyme activities in leaf extracts of Rosa damascena mill. var. trigentipetala. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. El-Yazied, A.A.; Ibrahim, M.F.M.; Ibrahim, M.A.R.; Nasef, I.N.; Al-Qahtani, S.M.; Al-Harbi, N.A.; Alzuaibr, F.M.; Alaklabi, A.; Dessoky, E.S.; Alabdallah, N.M.; et al. Melatonin Mitigates Drought Induced Oxidative Stress in Potato Plants through Modulation of Osmolytes, Sugar Metabolism, ABA Homeostasis and Antioxidant Enzymes. Plants 2022, 11, 1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hayat, R.; Ali, S.; Amara, U.; Khalid, R.; Ahmed, I. Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: A review. Ann. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 579–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Elkarmout, A.F.; Yang, M.; Hassan, F.A. Chitosan Treatment Effectively Alleviates the Adverse Effects of Salinity in Moringa oleifera Lam via Enhancing Antioxidant System and Nutrient Homeostasis. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Singh, S.; Parihar, P.; Singh, R.; Singh, V.P.; Prasad, S.M. Heavy metal tolerance in plants: Role of transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and ionomics. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Nasser, M.A.; El-Mogy, M.M.; Samaan, M.S.F.; Hassan, K.M.; El-Sayed, S.M.; Alsubeie, M.S.; Darwish, D.B.E.; Mahmoud, S.F.; Al-Harbi, N.A.; Al-Qahtani, S.M.; et al. Postharvest exogenous melatonin treatment of table grape berry enhances quality and maintains bioactive compounds during refrigerated storage. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Savvas, D.; Giotis, D.; Chatzieustratiou, E.; Bakea, M.; Patakioutas, G. Silicon supply in soilless cultivations of zucchini alleviates stress induced by salinity and powdery mildew infections. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009, 65, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Adatia, M.H.; Besford, R.T. The Effects of silicon on cucumber plants grown in recirculating nutrient solution. Ann. Bot. 1986, 58, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wang, S.Y.; Galletta, G.J. Effect of Silicon on Strawberry Plants. HortScience 1996, 31, 675d–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zhang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Gong, H.-J.; Zhao, H.-L.; Li, H.-L.; Hu, Y.-H.; Wang, Y.-C. Beneficial effects of silicon on photosynthesis of tomato seedlings under water stress. J. Integr. Agric. 2018, 17, 2151–2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Čermelj, A.M.; Golob, A.; Vogel-Mikuš, K.; Germ, M. Silicon mitigates negative impacts of drought and UV-B radiation in plants. Plants 2021, 11, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Mazrou, R.M.; Hassan, F.A.S.; Mansour, M.M.F.; Moussa, M.M. Melatonin Enhanced Drought Stress Tolerance and Productivity of Pelargonium graveolens L. (Herit) by Regulating Physiological and Biochemical Responses. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Hassan, I.F.; Ajaj, R.; Gaballah, M.S.; Ogbaga, C.C.; Kalaji, H.M.; Hatterman-Valenti, H.M.; Alam-Eldein, S.M. Foliar Application of Nano-Silicon Improves the Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of ‘Kalamata’ Olive Subjected to Deficit Irrigation in a Semi-Arid Climate. Plants 2022, 11, 1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Luyckx, M.; Hausman, J.-F.; Lutts, S.; Guerriero, G. Silicon and plants: Current knowledge and technological perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Zargar, S.M.; Agnihotri, A. Impact of silicon on various agromorphological and physiological parameters in maize and revealing its role in enhancing water stress tolerance. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2013, 25, 138–141. [Google Scholar]
  104. Zargar, S.M.; Mahajan, R.; Bhat, J.A.; Nazir, M.; Deshmukh, R. Role of silicon in plant stress tolerance: Opportunities to achieve a sustainable cropping system. 3 Biotech 2019, 9, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Asgharipour, M.R.; Mosapour, H. A foliar application silicon enhances drought tolerance in fennel. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2016, 26, 1056–1062. [Google Scholar]
  106. Putra, E.; Purwanto, B. Physiological responses of oil palm seedlings to the drought stress using boron and silicon applications. J. Agron. 2015, 14, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Abdalla, M. Beneficial effects of diatomite on the growth, the biochemical contents and polymorphic DNA in Lupinus albus plants grown under water stress. Agric. Biol. J. N. Am. 2011, 2, 207–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Gunes, A.; Pilbeam, D.J.; Inal, A.; Coban, S. Influence of silicon on sunflower cultivars under drought stress, I: Growth, antioxidant mechanisms, and lipid peroxidation. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2008, 39, 1885–1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Emam, M.M.; Khattab, H.E.; Helal, N.M.; Deraz, A.E. Effect of selenium and silicon on yield quality of rice plant grown under drought stress. Aust. J. Crop. Sci. 2014, 8, 596. [Google Scholar]
  110. Gao, X.; Zou, C.; Wang, L.; Zhang, F. Silicon decreases transpiration rate and conductance from stomata of maize plants. J. Plant Nutr. 2006, 29, 1637–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Khattab, H.I.; Emam, M.M.; Helal, N.M.; Mohamed, M.R. Effect of selenium and silicon on transcription factors NAC5 and DREB2A involved in drought-responsive gene expression in rice. Biol. Plant. 2014, 58, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Munns, R.; Gilliham, M. Salinity tolerance of crops—What is the cost? New Phytol. 2015, 208, 668–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Hafeez, M.B.; Raza, A.; Zahra, N.; Shaukat, K.; Akram, M.Z.; Iqbal, S.; Basra, S.M.A. Gene regulation in halophytes in conferring salt tolerance. In Handbook of Bioremediation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 341–370. [Google Scholar]
  114. Ali, A.; Basra, S.M.A.; Ahmad, R.; Wahid, A. Optimizing silicon application to improve salinity tolerance in wheat. Soil Environ. 2009, 2, 136–144. [Google Scholar]
  115. Garg, N.; Bhandari, P. Silicon nutrition and mycorrhizal inoculations improve growth, nutrient status, K+/Na+ ratio and yield of Cicer arietinum L. genotypes under salinity stress. Plant Growth Regul. 2015, 78, 371–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Gupta, B.; Huang, B. Mechanism of salinity tolerance in plants: Physiological, biochemical, and molecular characterization. Int. J. Genom. 2014, 2014, 701596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Li, H.; Zhu, Y.; Hu, Y.; Han, W.; Gong, H. Beneficial effects of silicon in alleviating salinity stress of tomato seedlings grown under sand culture. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2015, 37, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Abdalla, M.M. Impact of diatomite nutrition on two Trifolium alexandrinum cultivars differing in salinity tolerance. Int. J. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2011, 3, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Kardoni, F.S.J.S.M.; Mosavi, S.S.; Parande, S.; Torbaghan, M.E. Effect of salinity stress and silicon application on yield and component yield of faba bean (Vicia faba). Int. J. Agric. Crop. Sci. 2013, 6, 814. [Google Scholar]
  120. Yin, L.; Wang, S.; Li, J.; Tanaka, K.; Oka, M. Application of silicon improves salt tolerance through ameliorating osmotic and ionic stresses in the seedling of Sorghum bicolor. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 3099–3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ahmad, B. Interactive effects of silicon and potassium nitrate in improving salt tolerance of wheat. J. Integr. Agric. 2014, 13, 1889–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Mahdieh, M.; Habibollahi, N.; Amirjani, M.R.; Abnosi, M.H.; Ghorbanpour, M. Exogenous silicon nutrition ameliorates salt-induced stress by improving growth and efficiency of PSII in Oryza sativa L. cultivars. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2015, 15, 1050–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Abbas, T.; Balal, R.M.; Shahid, M.A.; Pervez, M.A.; Ayyub, C.M.; Aqueel, M.A.; Javaid, M.M. Silicon-induced alleviation of NaCl toxicity in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) is associated with enhanced photosynthesis, osmoprotectants and antioxidant metabolism. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2015, 37, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Manivannan, A.; Soundararajan, P.; Muneer, S.; Ko, C.H.; Jeong, B.R. Silicon mitigates salinity stress by regulating the physiology, antioxidant enzyme activities, and protein expression in Capsicum annuum ‘Bugwang’. BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 3076357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Xie, Z.; Song, R.; Shao, H.; Song, F.; Xu, H.; Lu, Y. Silicon improves maize photosynthesis in saline-alkaline soils. Sci. World J. 2015, 2015, 245072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Al-Aghabary, K.; Zhu, Z.; Shi, Q. Influence of silicon supply on chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence, and antioxidative enzyme activities in tomato plants under salt stress. J. Plant Nutr. 2005, 27, 2101–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Muneer, S.; Jeong, B.R. Proteomic analysis of salt-stress responsive proteins in roots of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) plants towards silicon efficiency. Plant Growth Regul. 2015, 77, 133–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zhu, Y.-X.; Xu, X.-B.; Hu, Y.-H.; Han, W.-H.; Yin, J.-L.; Li, H.-L.; Gong, H.-J. Silicon improves salt tolerance by increasing root water uptake in Cucumis sativus L. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 1629–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Khan, I.; Seleiman, M.F.; Chattha, M.U.; Jalal, R.S.; Mahmood, F.; Hassan, F.A.S.; Izzet, W.; Alhammad, B.A.; Ali, E.F.; Roy, R.; et al. Enhancing antioxidant defense system of mung bean with a salicylic acid exogenous application to mitigate cadmium toxicity. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Nap. 2021, 49, 12303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Gu, H.-H.; Qiu, H.; Tian, T.; Zhan, S.-S.; Deng, T.-H.-B.; Chaney, R.L.; Wang, S.-Z.; Tang, Y.-T.; Morel, J.L.; Qiu, R.-L. Mitigation effects of silicon rich amendments on heavy metal accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.) planted on multi-metal contaminated acidic soil. Chemosphere 2011, 83, 1234–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Zhang, C.; Wang, L.; Nie, Q.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, F. Long-term effects of exogenous silicon on cadmium translocation and toxicity in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2008, 62, 300–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Wu, J.-W.; Shi, Y.; Zhu, Y.-X.; Wang, Y.-C.; Gong, H.-J. Mechanisms of enhanced heavy metal tolerance in plants by silicon: A review. Pedosphere 2013, 23, 815–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Adrees, M.; Ali, S.; Rizwan, M.; Zia-Ur-Rehman, M.; Ibrahim, M.; Abbas, F.; Farid, M.; Qayyum, M.F.; Irshad, M.K. Mechanisms of silicon-mediated alleviation of heavy metal toxicity in plants: A review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 119, 186–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Sahebi, M.; Hanafi, M.M.; Akmar, A.S.N.; Rafii, M.Y.; Azizi, P.; Tengoua, F.F.; Azwa, J.N.M.; Shabanimofrad, M. Importance of silicon and mechanisms of biosilica formation in plants. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 396010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Maksimović, J.D.; Mojović, M.; Maksimović, V.; Römheld, V.; Nikolic, M. Silicon ameliorates manganese toxicity in cucumber by decreasing hydroxyl radical accumulation in the leaf apoplast. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 2411–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Tripathi, P.; Tripathi, R.D.; Singh, R.P.; Dwivedi, S.; Goutam, D.; Shri, M.; Trivedi, P.K.; Chakrabarty, D. Silicon mediates arsenic tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) through lowering of arsenic uptake and improved antioxidant defence system. Ecol. Eng. 2013, 52, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Abu-Muriefah, S.S. Effects of silicon on Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) plants grown under heavy metal stress conditions. Afr. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2015, 3, 255–268. [Google Scholar]
  138. Zeng, P.; Liu, J.; Zhou, H.; Wei, B.; Gu, J.; Liao, Y.; Liao, B.; Luo, X. Co-application of combined amendment (limestone and sepiolite) and Si fertilizer reduces rice Cd uptake and transport through Cd immobilization and Si–Cd antagonism. Chemosphere 2023, 316, 137859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Cao, F.; Dai, H.; Hao, P.-F.; Wu, F. Silicon regulates the expression of vacuolar H+-pyrophosphatase 1 and decreases cadmium accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Chemosphere 2020, 240, 124907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. da Cunha, K.P.V.; Nascimento, C.W.A.D. Silicon effects on metal tolerance and structural changes in maize (Zea mays L.) grown on a cadmium and zinc enriched soil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2009, 197, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Ali, S.; Farooq, M.A.; Yasmeen, T.; Hussain, S.; Arif, M.S.; Abbas, F.; Bharwana, S.A.; Zhang, G. The influence of silicon on barley growth, photosynthesis and ultra-structure under chromium stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2013, 89, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Bharwana, S.A.; Ali, S.; Farooq, M.A.; Iqbal, N.; Abbas, F.; Ahmad, M.S.A. Alleviation of lead toxicity by silicon is related to elevated photosynthesis, antioxidant enzymes suppressed lead uptake and oxidative stress in cotton. J. Bioremediation Biodegrad. 2013, 4, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Shen, X.; Xiao, X.; Dong, Z.; Chen, Y. Silicon effects on antioxidative enzymes and lipid peroxidation in leaves and roots of peanut under aluminum stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2014, 36, 3063–3069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Rizwan, M.; Meunier, J.-D.; Miche, H.; Keller, C. Effect of silicon on reducing cadmium toxicity in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. cv. Claudio W.) grown in a soil with aged contamination. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 209–210, 326–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Keller, C.; Rizwan, M.; Davidian, J.-C.; Pokrovsky, O.S.; Bovet, N.; Chaurand, P.; Meunier, J.-D. Effect of silicon on wheat seedlings (Triticum turgidum L.) grown in hydroponics and exposed to 0 to 30 µM Cu. Planta 2015, 241, 847–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Anwaar, S.A.; Ali, S.; Ali, S.; Ishaque, W.; Farid, M.; Farooq, M.A.; Najeeb, U.; Abbas, F.; Sharif, M. Silicon (Si) alleviates cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) from zinc (Zn) toxicity stress by limiting Zn uptake and oxidative damage. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 3441–3450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Bokor, B.; Bokorová, S.; Ondoš, S.; Švubová, R.; Lukačová, Z.; Hýblová, M.; Szemes, T.; Lux, A. Ionome and expression level of Si transporter genes (Lsi1, Lsi2, and Lsi6) affected by Zn and Si interaction in maize. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 22, 6800–6811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Shen, X.; Zhou, Y.; Duan, L.; Li, Z.; Eneji, A.E.; Li, J. Silicon effects on photosynthesis and antioxidant parameters of soybean seedlings under drought and ultraviolet-B radiation. J. Plant Physiol. 2010, 167, 1248–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Yao, X.; Chu, J.; Cai, K.; Liu, L.; Shi, J.; Geng, W. Silicon improves the tolerance of wheat seedlings to ultraviolet-B stress. Biol. Trace Element Res. 2011, 143, 507–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Malčovská, S.M.; Dučaiová, Z.; Maslaňáková, I.; Bačkor, M. Effect of silicon on growth, photosynthesis, oxidative status and phenolic compounds of maize (Zea mays L.) grown in cadmium excess. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2014, 225, 2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Ma, J.F.; Yamaji, N. Functions and transport of silicon in plants. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2008, 65, 3049–3057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Moraes, J.C.; Goussain, M.M.; Basagli, M.A.; Carvalho, G.A.; Ecole, C.C.; Sampaio, M.V. Silicon influence on the tritrophic interaction: Wheat plants, the greenbug Schizaphis graminum (Rondani) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), and its natural enemies, Chrysoperla externa (Hagen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) and Aphidius colemani Viereck (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Neotropical Èntomol. 2004, 33, 619–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Savant, N.K.; Snyder, G.H.; Datnoff, L.E. Silicon management and sustainable rice production. Adv. Agron. 1996, 58, 151–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Kim, S.G.; Kim, K.W.; Park, E.W.; Choi, D. Silicon-induced cell wall fortification of rice leaves: A possible cellular mechanism of enhanced host resistance to blast. Phytopathology 2002, 92, 1095–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Zhang, J.; Zou, W.; Li, Y.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wu, Z.; Tu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cai, X.; Peng, L. Silica distinctively affects cell wall features and lignocellulosic saccharification with large enhancement on biomass production in rice. Plant Sci. 2015, 239, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Mehrabanjoubani, P.; Abdolzadeh, A.; Sadeghipour, H.R.; Aghdasi, M.; Bagherieh-Najjar, M.B.; Barzegargolchini, B. Silicon increases cell wall thickening and lignification in rice (Oryza sativa) root tip under excess Fe nutrition. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 144, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Racchi, M.L. Antioxidant Defenses in Plants with Attention to Prunus and Citrus spp. Antioxidants 2013, 2, 340–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Oliveira, K.R.; Junior, J.P.S.; Bennett, S.J.; Checchio, M.V.; Alves, R.D.C.; Felisberto, G.; Prado, R.D.M.; Gratão, P.L. Exogenous silicon and salicylic acid applications improve tolerance to boron toxicity in field pea cultivars by intensifying antioxidant defence systems. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 201, 110778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Ma, J.F.; Miyake, Y.; Takahashi, E. Chapter 2 Silicon as a beneficial element for crop plants. In Silicon in Agriculture; Datnoff, L.E., Snyder, G.H., Korndorfer, G.H., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001; pp. 17–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Dannon, E.A.; Wydra, K. Interaction between silicon amendment, bacterial wilt development and phenotype of Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato genotypes. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2004, 64, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Weerahewa, D.; David, D. Effect of silicon and potassium on tomato anthracnose and on the postharvest quality of tomato fruit (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). J. Natl. Sci. Found. Sri Lanka 2015, 43, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Seebold, K.W.; Datnoff, L.E.; Correa-Victoria, F.J.; Kucharek, T.A.; Snyder, G.H. Effects of silicon and fungicides on the control of leaf and neck blast in upland rice. Plant Dis. 2004, 88, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Gao, D.; Cai, K.; Chen, J.; Luo, S.; Zeng, R.; Yang, J.; Zhu, X. Silicon enhances photochemical efficiency and adjusts mineral nutrient absorption in Magnaporthe oryzae infected rice plants. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2011, 33, 675–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Zellner, W.; Frantz, J.; Leisner, S. Silicon delays Tobacco ringspot virus systemic symptoms in Nicotiana tabacum. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168, 1866–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Wang, M.; Gao, L.; Dong, S.; Sun, Y.; Shen, Q.; Guo, S. Role of silicon on plant–pathogen interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Reynolds, O.L.; Padula, M.P.; Zeng, R.; Gurr, G.M. Silicon: Potential to promote direct and indirect effects on plant defense against arthropod pests in agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Fauteux, F.; Rémus-Borel, W.; Menzies, J.G.; Bélanger, R.R. Silicon and plant disease resistance against pathogenic fungi. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2005, 249, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Torabi, F.; Majd, A.; Enteshari, S. The effect of silicon on alleviation of salt stress in borage (Borago officinalis L.). Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2015, 61, 788–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Zhao, G.; Li, S.; Sun, X.; Wang, Y.; Chang, Z. The role of silicon in physiology of the medicinal plant (Lonicera japonica L.) under salt stress. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Shen, Z.; Cheng, X.; Li, X.; Deng, X.; Dong, X.; Wang, S.; Pu, X. Effects of silicon application on leaf structure and physiological characteristics of Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch. and Glycyrrhiza inflata Bat. under salt treatment. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Cui, J.; Zhang, E.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Q. Silicon alleviates salinity stress in licorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis) by regulating carbon and nitrogen metabolism. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Shen, Z.; Pu, X.; Wang, S.; Dong, X.; Cheng, X.; Cheng, M. Silicon improves ion homeostasis and growth of liquorice under salt stress by reducing plant Na+ uptake. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 5089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Mohammadi, H.; Hazrati, S.; Parviz, L. Morphophysiological and Biochemical Response of Savory Medicinal Plant Using Silicon under Salt Stress; Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, Sectio C–Biologia: Tabriz, Iran, 2019; Volume 72, pp. 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Kalteh, M.; Alipour, Z.T.; Ashraf, S.; Marashi, A.M.; Falah, N.A. Effect of silica nanoparticles on basil (Ocimum ba-silicum) under salinity stress. J. Chem. Health Risks 2014, 4, 49–55. [Google Scholar]
  175. Farahani, H.; Sajedi, N.A.; Madani, H.; Changizi, M.; Naeini, M.R. Effect of foliar-applied silicon on flower yield and essential oil composition of damask rose (Rosa damascena Miller) under water deficit stress. Silicon 2021, 13, 4463–4472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Li, J.; Leisner, S.M.; Frantz, J. Alleviation of copper toxicity in arabidopsis thaliana by silicon addition to hydroponic solutions. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2008, 133, 670–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Ramy, G.E.; Atef, M.K. Effects of Silicon Levels and Application Methods on Growth and Quality Characteristics of Nar-cissus tazetta L. Alex. J. Agric. Sci. 2019, 64, 231–243. [Google Scholar]
  178. Pozza, E.A.; Pozza, A.A.A.; Botelho, D.M.d.S. Silicon in plant disease control. Rev. Ceres 2015, 62, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Cabot, C.; Gallego, B.; Martos, S.; Barceló, J.; Poschenrieder, C. Signal cross talk in Arabidopsis exposed to cadmium, silicon, and Botrytis cinerea. Planta 2013, 237, 337–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Shohani, F.; Fazeli, A.; Hosseini, S. The Effects of Using Salicylic Acid and Silicon on Some Physiological and Anatomical Indices in Two Ecotypes of Scrophularia striata L. Medicinal Plant under Drought Stress. Iran. J. Plant Biol. 2022, 14, 33–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Ahmed, M.; Hassan, F.U.; Asif, M. Amelioration of drought in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) by silicon. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2014, 45, 470–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Farouk, S.; Omar, M.M. Sweet Basil Growth, Physiological and Ultrastructural Modification, and Oxidative Defense System Under Water Deficit and Silicon Forms Treatment. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 39, 1307–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Hajiboland, R.; Cheraghvareh, L.; Poschenrieder, C. Improvement of drought tolerance in Tobacco (Nicotiana rustica L.) plants by Silicon. J. Plant Nutr. 2017, 40, 1661–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Rahimi, S.; Hatami, M.; Ghorbanpour, M. Silicon-nanoparticle mediated changes in seed germination and vigor index of marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) compared to silicate under PEG-induced drought stress. Gesunde Pflanz. 2021, 73, 575–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Esmaili, S.; Tavallali, V.; Amiri, B. Nano-silicon complexes enhance growth, yield, water relations and mineral composition in tanacetum parthenium under water deficit stress. Silicon 2021, 13, 2493–2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Kang, J.; Zhao, W.; Zhu, X. Silicon improves photosynthesis and strengthens enzyme activities in the C 3 succulent xerophyte Zygophyllum xanthoxylum under drought stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 199, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Afshari, M.; Pazoki, A.; Sadeghipour, O. Foliar-applied silicon and its nanoparticles stimulate physio-chemical changes to improve growth, yield and active constituents of coriander (Coriandrum Sativum L.) essential oil under different irrigation regimes. Silicon 2021, 13, 4177–4188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Sharifian Jazi, S.; Pourakbar, L.; Enteshari, S. Salinity stress alleviation by use of silicon in Ocimum basilicum L.: An approach based on enhancing antioxidant responses. Iran. J. Plant Physiol. 2023, 13, 4617–4625. [Google Scholar]
  189. Yavaş, I.; Yilmaz, F.M.; Ünay, A. Promoting effect of foliar silicon on steviol glycoside contents of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni under salt stress. Int. J. Second. Metab. 2019, 6, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Gheshlaghpour, J.; Asghari, B.; Khademian, R.; Sedaghati, B. Silicon alleviates cadmium stress in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) through alteration of phytochemical and physiological characteristics. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2021, 163, 113338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Pirooz, P.; Amooaghaie, R.; Ahadi, A.; Sharififar, F. Silicon- induced nitric oxide burst modulates systemic defensive responses of Salvia officinalis under copper toxicity. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 162, 752–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Anee, T.I.; Fujita, M. Exogenous silicon attenuates cadmium-induced oxidative stress in Brassica napus L. by modulating asa-gsh pathway and glyoxalase system. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Rad, J.S.; Rad, M.S.; da Silva, J.A.T. Effects of exogenous silicon on cadmium accumulation and biological responses of Nigella sativa L. (Black Cumin). Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2014, 45, 1918–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Azarfam, S.; Nadian, H.; Moezzi, A.; Gholami, A. Effect of silicon on phytochemical and medicinal properties of aloe vera under cold stress. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2020, 18, 561–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Hu, J.; Li, Y.; Jeong, B.R. Silicon alleviates temperature stresses in poinsettia by regulating stomata, photosynthesis, and oxidative damages. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Qian, Z.Z.; Zhuang, S.Y.; Li, Q.; Gui, R.Y. Soil Silicon Amendment Increases Phyllostachys praecox Cold Tolerance in a Pot Experiment. Forests 2019, 10, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Abbai, R.; Kim, Y.-J.; Mohanan, P.; Farh, M.E.-A.; Mathiyalagan, R.; Yang, D.-U.; Rangaraj, S.; Venkatachalam, R.; Kim, Y.-J.; Yang, D.-C. Silicon confers protective effect against ginseng root rot by regulating sugar efflux into apoplast. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. McDonagh, D.; Hunter, A. Effect of silicon application on Lolium perenne development and Fusarium control. In Proceedings of the XXVIII International Horticultural Congress on Science and Horticulture for People (IHC2010): International Symposium on Plant 2010, Lisbon, Portugal, 22 August 2010; Volume 917, pp. 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Ratnayake, R.M.R.N.K.; Daundasekera, W.A.M.; Ariyarathne, H.M.; Ganehenege, M.Y.U. Some biochemical defense responses enhanced by soluble silicon in bitter gourd-powdery mildew pathosystem. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2016, 45, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Deepak, S.; Manjunath, G.; Manjula, S.; Niranjan-Raj, S.; Geetha, N.P.; Shetty, H.S. Involvement of silicon in pearl millet resistance to downy mildew disease and its interplay with cell wall proline/hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2008, 37, 498–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Brecht, M.O.; Datnoff, L.E.; Kucharek, T.A.; Nagata, R.T. The influence of silicon on the components of resistance to gray leaf spot in St. Augustinegrass. J. Plant Nutr. 2007, 30, 1005–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The vital roles of silicon in biotic and abiotic stress tolerance.
Figure 1. The vital roles of silicon in biotic and abiotic stress tolerance.
Horticulturae 10 00806 g001
Table 1. The vital roles of silicon on alleviating abiotic stresses in medicinal and aromatic plants.
Table 1. The vital roles of silicon on alleviating abiotic stresses in medicinal and aromatic plants.
Plant Kind of StressSilicon RoleReference
1-Foeniculum vulgar L.DroughtReducing the rate of transpiration and the permeability of membranes and improving the use of water and osmotic capacity.Asgharipour and Mosapour 2016 [105]
2-Helianthus annuus L.DroughtIncreasing the activity of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, APX, CAT, and POD).Gunes et al., 2008 [108]
3-Scrophularia striata L.DroughtIncreasing gas exchange indicators, increasing the rate of photosynthesis, increasing the moisture content and total protein inside the plant.Shohani et al., 2022 [180]
4-Sorghum bicolor L.DroughtIncreasing leaf area, increasing the percentage of chlorophyll, and improving photosynthesis rates.Ahmed et al., 2014 [181]
5-Ocimum basilicum L.DroughtIncreasing enzymatic antioxidant activity, improving osmotic regulation, and improving essential oil productivity.Farouk and Omar 2020 [182]
6-Nicotiana Rustica L.DroughtImproving the activity of antioxidant enzymes; increasing the percentage of free amino acids, soluble proteins, and proline; and reducing H2O2 levels within the plant.Hajiboland et al., 2017 [183]
7-Calendula officinalis L.DroughtImproving the rate of seed germination and seedling growth under drought stress.Saeedeh et al., 2021 [184]
8-Tanacetum parthenium L.DroughtImproving the absorption of some elements such as phosphorus and water use efficiency and increasing the water content within the plant.Esmaili et al., 2021 [185]
9-Ygophyllum xanthoxylum L.DroughtIncreasing the chlorophyll content of the leaves as well as the water content and increasing the activity of antioxidant enzymes.Kang et al., 2016 [186]
10-Coriandrum sativum L.DroughtIncreasing the efficiency of used water, total soluble sugars (TSS), phenols, and total flavonoids.Afshari et al., 2021 [187]
11-Ocimum basilicum L.SalinityIncreasing chlorophyll, carbohydrates, and the activity of antioxidant enzymes and reducing the proportion of H2O2 in the plant.Sharifian Jazi et al., 2023 [188]
12-Stevia rebaudiana L.SalinityReducing sodium absorption and increasing steviol glycoside production.Yavaş et al., 2019 [189]
13-Ocimum basilicum L.Heavy metal (Cd)Increasing the activity of antioxidant enzymes, phenols, flavonoids, caffeic and chocoric acids, reducing cadmium absorption and accumulation, and reducing MDA content and the rate of electrolyte leakage.Gheshlaghpour et al., 2021 [190]
14-Salvia officinalis L.Heavy metal (Cu)Strengthening the enzymatic antioxidant system, increasing protein content, regulating the gene expression of the SOD enzyme, and reducing oxidative damage.Pirooz et al., 2021 [191]
14-Brassica napus LHeavy metal (Cd)Si treatment reduced the H2O2 and MDA contents and improved the activity of antioxidant enzymes.Hasanuzzaman et al., 2017 [192]
15-Nigella sativa L.Heavy metal (Cd)Improving relative water content (RWC) and chlorophyll content and reducing Cd absorptionSharifi Rad et al., 2014 [193]
16-Aloe barbadensis L.Low temperatureEnhancing the activity of antioxidant enzymes and increasing the percentage of total dissolved sugars.Azarfam et al., 2020 [194]
17-Euphorbia pulcherrima L.High temperature Improving photosynthesis, regulating the opening and closing of stomata, reducing oxidative damage, and reducing MDA and H2O2 levels within the plant.Hu et al., 2020 [195]
18-Phyllostachys praecoxLow temperatureActivating the plant’s enzymatic antioxidant system.Qian et al., 2019 [196]
Table 2. The vital roles of silicon in alleviating biotic stresses in medicinal and aromatic plants.
Table 2. The vital roles of silicon in alleviating biotic stresses in medicinal and aromatic plants.
Plant Kind of Stress Silicon Role Reference
1-Rosa sp.Powdery mildewImproving the gene expression of the phenylalanine ammonialease PAL. Elsharkawy et al., 2015 [84]
2-Arabidopsis thalianaBotrytisImproving the gene expression of the PDF1 gene.Cabot et al., 2013 [179]
3-Panax ginsengGinseng root rotDecreasing the expression of the PgSWEET gene results in controlled sugar transport into the apoplast and improving tolerance to I. mors-panacis.Abbai et al., 2019 [197]
4-Nicotiana
tabacum
Viral infectionSilicon accumulation in leaf tissue delayed infection compared to untreated plants.Zellner et al., 2011 [164]
5-Lolium
perenne
Fusarium patchIncrease resistance to disease by depositing a physical protective barrier on the leaf tissue.McDonagh and Hunter, 2010 [198]
6-Momordica
charantia
Powdery
mildew
Si accumulates below the cuticle, forming a barrier against pathogens and inducing metabolic defensive responses in plants.Ratnayake et al., 2016 [199]
7-Pennisetum
glaucum
Downy mildewIncreasing the level of silicon in tissues led to an increase in the level of glycoproteins rich in hydroxyproline, which led to the increased resistance of plants to the pathogen.Deepak et al., 2008 [200]
8-Stenotaphrum
secundatum
Gray leaf spotIncreasing plant resistance to gray leaf spot by the accumulation of calcium silicate Brecht et al., 2007 [201]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hassan, K.M.; Ajaj, R.; Abdelhamid, A.N.; Ebrahim, M.; Hassan, I.F.; Hassan, F.A.S.; Alam-Eldein, S.M.; Ali, M.A.A. Silicon: A Powerful Aid for Medicinal and Aromatic Plants against Abiotic and Biotic Stresses for Sustainable Agriculture. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 806. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10080806

AMA Style

Hassan KM, Ajaj R, Abdelhamid AN, Ebrahim M, Hassan IF, Hassan FAS, Alam-Eldein SM, Ali MAA. Silicon: A Powerful Aid for Medicinal and Aromatic Plants against Abiotic and Biotic Stresses for Sustainable Agriculture. Horticulturae. 2024; 10(8):806. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10080806

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hassan, Karim M., Rahaf Ajaj, Ahmed N. Abdelhamid, Mohamed Ebrahim, Islam F. Hassan, Fahmy A. S. Hassan, Shamel M. Alam-Eldein, and Mahmoud A. A. Ali. 2024. "Silicon: A Powerful Aid for Medicinal and Aromatic Plants against Abiotic and Biotic Stresses for Sustainable Agriculture" Horticulturae 10, no. 8: 806. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10080806

APA Style

Hassan, K. M., Ajaj, R., Abdelhamid, A. N., Ebrahim, M., Hassan, I. F., Hassan, F. A. S., Alam-Eldein, S. M., & Ali, M. A. A. (2024). Silicon: A Powerful Aid for Medicinal and Aromatic Plants against Abiotic and Biotic Stresses for Sustainable Agriculture. Horticulturae, 10(8), 806. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10080806

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop