Next Article in Journal
Physiological and Transcriptional Characteristics of Banana Seedlings in Response to Nitrogen Deficiency Stress
Next Article in Special Issue
Innovative Cultivation Practices for Reducing Nitrate Content in Baby Leaf Lettuce Grown in a Vertical Farm
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of the Differences in Tolerance to Drought Stress across Five Clematis Species Based on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth
Previous Article in Special Issue
Landscape and Agriculture 4.0: A Deep Farm in Italy in the Underground of a Public Historical Garden
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Seed Spaceflight Storage on Tomato Fruit Quality and Peel/Pulp Mineral and Antioxidant Distribution

1
Federal Scientific Vegetable Center, Selectsionnaya 14, VNIISSOK, Odintsovo District, 143072 Moscow, Russia
2
Institute of Nutrition and Biotechnology, Ustinsky pr, 2/14, 119240 Moscow, Russia
3
Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of Russian Academy of Science, Kosigina 4, 119334 Moscow, Russia
4
Department of Food Technology, University ‘Ion Ionescu de la Brad’ of Life Sciences of Iasi, 700440 Iasi, Romania
5
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2024, 10(3), 289; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10030289
Submission received: 16 February 2024 / Revised: 8 March 2024 / Accepted: 14 March 2024 / Published: 18 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Indoor Farming and Artificial Cultivation)

Abstract

:
The spaceflight storage of seeds is known to cause mutations affecting both their quality and the mature plants originating from them. To study the effects of space stress, tomato seeds of two cultivars (Lotus and Autumn rhapsody) were subjected to half a year of storage at the International Space Station (ISS), and then, sown in a greenhouse to produce tomato fruits. The space-treated plants gave smaller fruits with a stable total yield not significantly different from that of the control plants. Space-treated tomatoes showed significantly higher levels of dry matter, dietary fiber, monosaccharides and citric and malic acids and lower values of oxalic acid compared to the control plants. The pulp of space-treated fruits had 1.44–1.70 times lower levels of carotenoids, while their peel contained a 1.27–1.90 times higher pigment amount compared to the control plants. No significant changes in the total antioxidant activity (AOA), photosynthetic pigments and phenolic (TP) and proline content were recorded in the fruits due to seed spaceflight storage. Contrarily, space-treated tomatoes showed decreased levels of Ca, Sr and Mo and increased Se both in the fruit pulp and peel. The concentration of Fe and especially Pb was lower in space-treated fruit pulp. Positive correlations between Se and dry matter, Ca and Sr, Ca and Co, Ca and Fe, and Cr and carotenoids, and negative correlations between Se and Mo, Se and K, and Mo and dry matter were recorded. The results indicate that seed stress caused by long-term spaceflight affects both the biochemical characteristics and mineral composition of tomato fruits and causes the peel/pulp redistribution of carotenoids as well as macro- and micro-elements, improving Se accumulation levels in the fruit peel.

1. Introduction

The effect of spaceflight on seed vigor and genetic changes has been the object of many investigations aiming to increase the rate of breeding [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. The exposure of seeds to radiation and microgravity during storage at the ISS greatly affects gene expression [9], causing mutations [10], chromosome aberration [11] and morphological changes [12]. Microgravity increases the sensitivity of plants to radiation [13], and the duration of these stress factors is critical for seed viability and stress resistance. The radiation at the ISS includes the impact of galactic cosmic rays (GCRs), of the South Atlantic anomaly of the Earth’s radiation belt (SAA) and of solar flares. According to literature reports, the mean total radiation dose at the ISS per half year is about 7.5 cGy for GCRs, 2.3 cGy for SAA and up to 5 cGy during intensive large solar particle events [14]. Chronic exposure of plants to the mentioned stress factors may affect oxidative stress-related genes and genes belonging to carbohydrate and nucleic acid metabolism and photosynthesis [15].
Indeed, spaceflight is known to induce mutations in seeds [16], and may affect genes essential for root hair growth [17], improve the production of stress response proteins, and inhibit auxin metabolism [18]. Numerous investigations in this field demonstrated high varietal and species differences in plant and seed responses to microgravity and cosmic radiation, suggesting high potential of seed space treatment to improve seed germination and mature plant yield and quality [19,20,21,22]. Previous investigations by Kahn and Stoffella [23] demonstrated tomato seed tolerance to long-term spaceflight storage. Contrarily, many studies indicating genetic mutation showed the development of oxidative stress both in seeds and mature plants [24,25,26,27,28,29,30].
Plant tolerance to abiotic stresses depends on many factors, including genetic peculiarities, morphological modifications, the production of secondary metabolites, activation of the antioxidant defense system, hormonal changes and modulations in the mineral composition of tissues [31]. The complexity of plant responses to abiotic stresses and the significance of this phenomenon for the efficiency of crop production and quality promote intensive investigations of the mechanism of plant protection and adaptability [32]. In this respect, most of the investigations have been devoted to the widespread abiotic stresses of drought, salinity, nutrient deficiency, extreme temperatures, etc. Contrary, information about the mechanism of plant defense against stresses caused by seed exposure to spaceflight [6] is much scanter.
The aim of the present study was the evaluation of the antioxidant status and mineral profiles of two tomato cultivars grown from seeds after half a year of storage at the International Space Station (ISS).

2. Material and Methods

Research was carried out on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) grown in a greenhouse at the Federal Scientific Vegetable Center in Odintsovo (Moscow region, Russia). The experimental protocol was based on the factorial combination of a seed space treatment plus an untreated control and two cultivars (Lotus and Autumn Rhapsody). A randomized complete block design was used for the treatment distribution in the greenhouse, with three replicates.
Tomato seeds of cultivars Lotus and Autumn Rhapsody (selection of Federal Scientific Vegetable Center) were exposed at the space station ISS-21-Korolev from 18 March 2022 to 29 September 2022. Seeds were stored in sealed foil bags inside the ISS, at an average temperature of 22–23 °C and 25% humidity. The untreated control seeds of the two mentioned cultivars were also stored in sealed foil bags under the same temperature and humidity conditions during the whole experiment at the Federal Scientific Vegetable Center.
Seeds were sown on 31 March 2023, and the seedlings were transplanted in 120 cm wide soil beds, spaced 30 cm along the rows (2.8 plants per m2), in an unheated polycarbonate greenhouse on 3 May. The plants were supplied with the organo-mineral fertilizer ‘Universal’, protected against the late blight by a single spray with the ‘Prophit Gold’ preparation (‘Gardener’s Green Pharmacy’ Co. Ltd., Moscow, Russia). Drip irrigation was activated when the soil humidity dropped to 80% of the available water capacity at a 20 cm depth. Regular soil loosening and weed removal were carried out during the vegetation phase. Tomato fruits were collected twice a week beginning from 17 June.
The ‘Germination—flowering’ periods of both control and space-treated plants lasted 52 days for cv. Lotus and 55 days for Autumn rhapsody; the ‘Germination—biological ripeness’ period was 94 and 101 days long for cvs. Lotus and Autumn rhapsody, respectively.
The mean day and night temperatures during plant cycles were 20–27 °C and 15–18 °C, respectively. Drip irrigation was carried out to maintain the optimal soil humidity (70%). No artificial illumination of plants was used.

2.1. Sample Preparation

Tomato fruits were harvested from 17 June to 16 August. The number, weight and diameter of mature fruits per plant, and plant height were measured for 15 randomly selected plants per plot. Biochemical characteristics of fruits were evaluated on random samples of three units per cluster both in control and space-treated plants.
After harvesting and calculating the fruit number and weight, a fraction of each sample was homogenized, and fresh homogenates were used for the determination of the ascorbic acid, nitrates, dietary fiber and organic acid content. The remainder of the samples were used for peel and pulp separation. To obtain fruit peel, ripe tomato fruits were immersed into hot water (85 °C) for 1–2 min, cooled down quickly under tap water, dried with filter paper and hand peeled.
Fresh homogenates of the peel and pulp of 10 fruits were used for the carotenoid profile assessment. After carotenoid analysis, peel and pulp samples were dried at 70 °C to a constant weight and used for the determination of proline, monosaccharides, total polyphenol content (TP), total antioxidant activity (AOA) and mineral composition.
Photosynthetic pigments were determined in fresh leaves.

2.2. Dry Matter

The dry matter content was determined gravimetrically after drying peel and pulp samples up to constant weight at 70 °C in an oven.

2.3. Mineral Composition

Tomato fruit elemental profiling, including Al, As, B, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, P, Pb, Se, Sr, V and Zn, was performed on dried homogenized fruit peel and pulp samples using ICP-MS on a quadruple mass-spectrometer Nexion 300D (Perkin Elmer Inc., Shelton, CT, USA) and a Berghof SW-4 DAP-40 microwave digestion system (Berghof Products + Instruments Gmb H, 72, 800 Eningen, Germany), as reported by Kharchenko et al. [33].

2.4. Ascorbic Acid

The ascorbic acid content was assessed using the manual titration method based on the interaction of the ascorbic acid with sodium 2,6-dichlorophenol indophenolate (Tillman’s reagent) [34].

2.5. Total Polyphenols (TP)

To implement a unified approach to the analysis of the total antioxidant activity (AOA), polyphenol, sugar, proline and mineral content, tomato fruits were dried to a constant weight at ambient temperature before the analysis. This provided high representativeness of tomato sampling, particularly important when using low sample weight (less than 500 mg), and ensured the high storability of probes.
The Folin–Ciocalteu colorimetric method was used for total polyphenol determination utilizing 70% ethanol extracts of dry peel/pulp homogenates [35]. The concentration of polyphenols was assessed using the absorption value of the Folin reagent–sample ethanol extract reaction mixture at 730 nm (Unico 2804 UV spectrophotometer, Suite E Dayton, NJ, USA). The solution of 0.02% gallic acid was used as an external standard, and all the results were expressed in mg of Gallic Acid Equivalent per g of dry weight (mg GAE g−1 d.w.).

2.6. Carotenoids

The determination of carotenoid content in fruit peel and pulp was carried out spectrophotometrically after the chromatographic separation of carotenoids [35]. About 0.5 g of fresh homogenized sample was ground in a mortar with ceramic powder and extracted with small portions of acetone until color disappearance. The combined extract was diluted with 9 mL of hexane and washed 4–5 times with distilled water to remove traces of acetone. The residual extract was quantitatively transferred to a volumetric flask, and the volume was adjusted to 10 mL with hexane. The resulting extract was mixed and filtered through a small portion of anhydrous Na2SO4. The separation of carotenoids was achieved using quantitative thin-layer chromatography on Whatman 3A chromatographic paper in two chromatographic systems: (1) hexane to separate β-carotene and (2) hexane–acetone, 10:0.5 for separation of lycopene and lutein. Appropriate zones of carotenoid compounds were cut out and filled with 3 mL of hexane. The determination of carotenoid content in tomato fruit was performed using appropriate specific absorption E1%1cm for β-carotene (2580 at λ = 450 nm), lycopene (3470 at λ = 474 nm) and lutein (2560; λ = 447 nm) on a Unico 2804 UV spectrophotometer. The internal standards were β-carotene, lutein and lycopene from Sigma Inc. (Kure, Japan).

2.7. Antioxidant Activity (AOA)

To evaluate the total antioxidant activity of fruit peel and pulp, 0.01 N KMnO4 solution was titrated with ethanol extracts of peel/pulp homogenates until the solution became completely discolored [35]. Gallic acid (PhytoLab GmbH & Co. KG, Vestenbergsgreuth, Germany) was used as an external standard, and the values obtained were expressed in mg GAE g−1 d.w.

2.8. Proline

Proline determination was carried out using 3% sulfur salicylic extract of dry homogenized tomato pulp via a reaction with ninhydrin reagent in acetic acid, as described by Ouertani et al. [36]. After heating at 95 °C for 1 h, the probes were cooled and extracted with toluene. Proline content was calculated using the absorption value of the extract at 505 nm and a calibration curve with 5 different proline (Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA) concentrations.

2.9. Photosynthetic Pigments

Chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotene content in tomato leaves was assessed spectrophotometrically by a Unico 2804 UV spectrophotometer using 96% ethanol extract of fresh leaf samples and the following equations developed by Lichtenthaler [37]:
Ch-a = 13.36A664 − 5.19A649;
Ch-b = 27.43A649 − 8.12A664;
C c = (1000A470 − 2.13 Ch-a − 87.63 Ch-b)/209;
where A = absorbance, Ch-a = chlorophyll a, Ch-b = chlorophyll b and C c = carotene.

2.10. Organic Acids

Organic acid content was determined via HPLC (Agilent 1100) (column Zorbax Bonus-RP C18; 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μM; flow rate of 1.0 mL·min−1; wavelength of 210 nm) using an isocratic elution with phosphate buffer at pH 2.5 [38]. Appropriate standards of organic acids (citric, oxalic, malic) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Burlington, MA, USA). The results are expressed as the means of three replications.

2.11. Dietary Fiber

The dietary fiber content in tomato fruits was assessed gravimetrically after the enzymatic sequential hydrolysis of starch and non-starch compounds with protease, α-amylase and amyloglucosidase (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MI, USA) to mono-, di-, oligosaccharides and peptides and the appropriate precipitation of dietary fibers with ethanol. The fiber content was determined after drying the precipitate at 70 °C to a constant weight and is expressed in % per d.w. [39].

2.12. Statistical Analysis

The data were statistically processed by conducting an analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the mean separation was determined through Duncan’s test at p < 0.05, using the SPSS software version 28 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Biometrical Parameters, Dry Matter and Dietary Fiber

The chosen tomato cultivars differed both by fruit size and colour: Lotus is a spread cultivar with medium-sized red fruits smaller than those of Autumn rhapsody (Table 1), and a predominant content of lycopene while the orange fruits of Autumn rhapsody contain β-carotene as the main carotenoid pigment (Table 5). The UV spectrum of individual carotenoids in the latter case confirmed the structure of β-carotene and the absence of pro-lycopene, typical for tangerine tomatoes.
The fruit weight and diameter of space-treated plants were tendentially lower than those of the control fruits, but with no significant differences (Table 1). The lack of yield differences between the control and space-treated plants suggests that space stress induced the formation of a higher number of lighter fruits.
A significant increase in fruit dry matter due to the seed space storage was recorded for both cultivars (Table 1). The differences in dry weight between the control and space-treated plants reached 1.5 times in Lotus pulp and 1.2 times in peel and, accordingly, 1.13 and 1.35 times in the pulp/peel of Autumn rhapsody tomatoes (Table 1). Notably, similar trends were recorded for fruit dietary fiber content and dry matter, also suggesting a presumably close relationship between the latter and total fiber. Most tomato fibers (87%) are represented by hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin. The increased dietary fiber content in space-treated tomato fruits is directly connected with plant lignification under stress conditions [40,41]. The lignin carbohydrate complex is known to increase plant resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses via the enhancement of plant tissue hardness and mechanical strength [42], and the stimulation of nutrient assimilation and water transport [43].
Significant differences in the dry matter content between the control and space-treated plants caused the need to calculate all the parameters, including photosynthetic pigments and the ascorbic acid content per dry weight, to make the appropriate comparisons.

3.2. Photosynthetic Pigments

Photosynthetic pigment accumulation is closely connected with the intensity of plant development, indicating the efficiency of carbon assimilation. Indeed, the evaluation of the intensity of photo-pigment accumulation in lettuce, Brassicaceae and Apiaceae species grown from the one-year storage of seeds at the ISS demonstrated significant species and varietal differences directly related to plant yield [33]. In the present study, the analysis of photosynthetic pigments showed an increase in the chlorophyll a level only in space-treated cv. Autumn rhapsody, while no significant changes were recorded for total chlorophyll content and carotene levels (Table 2). Nevertheless, a significant increase in the chl a/chl b ratio was detected in the leaves of space-treated plants.
Chl a and Chl b interconversion is known to regulate the PSI/PSII ratio. Moreover, Chl a is recorded in both core and light harvesting complexes, whereas Chl b is found only in the latter case. The increase in Chl a content and conversion of Chl b to Chl a during chlorophyll degradation is a critical point in plant survival under stress conditions [44]. Accordingly, the significant increase in the Chl a/Chl b ratio in the space-treated leaves of cv. Autumn rhapsody is consistent with the mentioned phenomenon.

3.3. Organic Acids

Photosynthetic pigment accumulation is closely connected with sugar and organic acid content. These compounds affect tomato fruit flavor and taste [45]. Tomato organic acids (predominantly citric and malic acids) influence fruit acidity and play an important role in regulating osmotic pressure, pH homeostasis and stress resistance. Their levels in tomato fruit are affected both by genetic peculiarities and environmental stress factors, improving photosynthesis, antioxidant defense and osmoregulation [46]. Abiotic stresses are known to affect endogenous citric and malic acid levels in plants. Indeed, drought stress was shown to significantly increase the citric acid content in tomato, Gossypium hirsutum, Clusia sp. and Aptenia cordifolia [46]. In the present investigation, space-treated tomato plants showed 1.26 times higher levels of citric acid and 1.16–1.19 times higher content of malic acid compared to the control fruits (Table 3).
The organic acid pool of citric and malic acids may play a significant role in decreasing oxalic acid content [46], which is in accordance with the present data indicating a 4–5 times oxalic acid decrease in space-treated tomatoes (Table 3).
Monosaccharides are also known to participate actively in plant antioxidant defense, acting as signaling molecules and ROS scavengers [47]. Varietal differences in the accumulation of these compounds in the fruit of the control and experimental tomatoes indicate a higher intensity of monosaccharide level increases in the fruit of space-treated cv. Autumn rhapsody compared to cv. Lotus (1.24 times compared to 1.12 times), while changes in the organic acid content were more pronounced in Lotus fruit (1.25 times compared to 1.18 times).
Space stress caused a decrease in nitrate content by 1.33–1.41 times.

3.4. AOA, TP, Ascorbic Acid and Proline

The comparison between the polyphenol analysis results of fresh and dried tomato pulp samples revealed that the polyphenol losses did not exceed 5% in the latter case. Contrarily, dried samples retained their antioxidant characteristics for half a year with an insignificant decrease in TP (less than 1–2%), while the TP losses reached about 30–40% in the fresh samples kept at −10 °C, in the mentioned time. These results are consistent with the literature reports, reflecting the lowest polyphenol losses during short sample drying time at ambient temperature and the highest in cases of long storage or drying time at low temperature [48].
In general, the antioxidant status of tomato fruits is determined by many parameters, such as organic acid, monosaccharide, proline and polyphenol content; total antioxidant activity; and the carotenoid profile.
The present results indicate a lack of significant changes in fruit AOA, polyphenol (TP), ascorbic acid and proline content due to seed space storage (Table 4). Only a tendency toward increasing proline and ascorbic acid levels was recorded (Table 4). Contrary, the content of polyphenols in the peel of the control and space-treated tomato fruits was 1.1–1.4 times higher compared to the fruit pulp.

3.5. Carotenoids

The most significant changes in antioxidant defense were detected with regard to the carotenoid profile of fruit peel and pulp (Table 5). Among the identified carotenoids, only low lutein levels demonstrated a lack of significant differences between the control and space-treated plant fruit. Contrary, lycopene accumulation in the pulp of Lotus fruit and β-carotene in the pulp of cv. Autumn rhapsody showed 2.0 and 1.8 times decreases, respectively. The opposite phenomenon was recorded in fruit peel, where a significant major carotenoid content increase due to seed space storage was demonstrated (lycopene in Lotus fruit and β-carotene in Autumn rhapsody fruit) (Figure 1). In a previous experiment, we recorded a moderate carotenoid content increase in experimental tomato fruit, cv. Podmoskovny grown from seeds after half a year storage at the ISS [49]. Unfortunately, no separation of fruit peel and pulp was achieved, which makes it difficult to perform an adequate comparison.
The present results indicate the significance of tomato peel/pulp carotenoid distribution due to long-term seed space stress. The existence of the ‘edge effect’ phenomenon in plants entails that the high antioxidant status of the outer tissues reflects a powerful mechanism of plant protection against different forms of oxidative stresses [50]. Genetic changes in tomato seeds due to long-term space stress led to enhanced carotenoid content to the fruit’s outer peel and decreased carotenoid accumulation in the pulp. The total carotenoid contents in the peel of space-treated tomato fruit were 2.4–4.4 times higher than those recorded in the pulp samples (Table 5).
The phenomenon of seed spaceflight storage effect on mature tomato plant quality not only includes significant changes in the biochemical characteristics of the fruit but is also characterized by valuable peel/pulp redistribution of the dry matter, and especially carotenoids, improving plant protection (Figure 2). In this respect, the changes induced by space stress in seeds [51] and in peel/pulp may become especially important in the breeding of plants with high tolerance to abiotic stresses.

3.6. Elemental Composition

The evaluation of ash content in tomato fruit revealed a tendency to total mineral accumulation increase in the pulp of space-treated fruit and an opposite phenomenon in peel, reaching values of 1.13 for cv. Lotus and 1.50 for Autumn rhapsody (Figure 3).
The significant decreases in peel ash content in space-treated tomato fruits were in accordance with the corresponding decreases in peel Ca levels in fruits grown from spaceflight seeds (Table 6). Interestingly, decreased Ca levels were recorded both in the peel and pulp of space-treated fruits. Considering that Ca accumulation in plant tissues directly depends on the expression of transport proteins [52], it may be supposed that the Ca decrease may reflect important space-induced genetic changes, possibly resulting in the inhibition of cell wall strength due to the important role of Ca in cell wall stability [53]. Ca is known to improve plant responses to different stresses via stimulation of the stress response genes, acting as a signaling molecule in different physiological and biochemical pathways, improving nutrient uptake and stabilizing cellular membranes [54]. In this respect, a significant decrease in Ca levels in tomato pulp, and especially peel, may reflect a negative effect of seed spaceflight storage on tomato adaptability. Conversely, the predominance of Ca accumulation in tomato peel, both in the control and space-treated plants, indicates the significance of Ca protection in bordering tissues.
The high accumulation of Ca in tomato peel has been previously described by Elbadrawy and Sello [55]. In the present study, the chemical similarity of Ca and Sr [56] was reflected in the synchronous decrease in both Ca and Sr content in space-treated tomato fruits due to seed spaceflight storage (Figure 4). In this respect, seed spaceflight storage changed the accumulation levels of Ca and Sr but also affected the relationship between these elements (Figure 5).
Despite the significant varietal differences in the Ca/Sr ratio, the results show a more substantial Sr decrease due to seed space storage compared to Ca (Table 6, Figure 5).
The received data also indicated significantly decreased values of Ca/Na ratios both in the experimental fruit pulp (1.6 times in cv. Autumn rhapsody and 1.8 times in cv. Lotus) and fruit peel (1.7 and 2.9 times, respectively), which suggests the possibility of predicting plant protection decreases in conditions of salt stress, where Ca is known to mitigate the negative effect of Na+ [57]. Further investigations are necessary to confirm this hypothesis in space tomatoes.
Information about the effect of seed spaceflight storage on the mineral composition of mature plants is rather scarce. Indeed, a significant decrease in most minerals was recorded in leafy vegetables grown from spaceflight storage seeds, except Se, whose concentration in space-treated plants was significantly higher than in the control ones [33]. The decrease of iron and copper levels in space-treated tomato fruits were also indicated in another work [49].
The present results confirm the phenomenon of Se level increases due to seed long-term spaceflight storage (Table 6, Figure 3). An improvement in Se accumulation was recorded both in fruit pulp and peel, reaching values of 4–5 and 1.8–2.8, respectively. Varietal differences were reflected in the intensity of Se peel/pulp accumulation. While Autumn rhapsody exhibited a predominant increase in peel Se levels, cv. Lotus demonstrated the opposite trend, with a significantly more intense pulp Se increase compared to the peel data (Figure 4). The beneficial effect of Se in improving plant tolerance to abiotic stresses is largely connected with its antioxidant properties [58] and its ability to regulate the biosynthesis of phytohormones [59,60], thus affecting all biochemical reactions of the plant organism.
Among the elements tested, Fe demonstrated significant peel/pulp redistribution in tomato fruits, with a significant concentration increase in the pulp tissues and a corresponding decrease in the peel of space-treated plants (Figure 4, Table 6). Iron participates in a variety of metabolic processes, affecting biomass production and photosynthesis, improving mitochondrial respiration and protein biosynthesis, and providing high activity of antioxidant enzymes and membrane protection [54,56,61]. The significant decrease in Fe accumulation in space-treated tomato fruit described previously in the whole tomato fruit [49] was not confirmed in the present study for the cvs. Lotus and Autumn rhapsody. In this respect, cv. Autumn rhapsody demonstrated more substantial changes compared to cv. Lotus. To date, no data exist on the significance of Fe peel/pulp distribution in tomato adaptability, which indicates the necessity for further investigation.
Molybdenum is another essential element significantly affected by tomato seed space storage (Figure 4). Due to the presence of Mo in many enzymes participating in the redox reactions of plants and affecting nitrogen metabolism [62], the significant decrease in its concentration in tomato pulp and peel due to seed space storage indicates the existence of another stress factor influencing tomato plants grown from space-treated seeds.
Among the elements tested, Pb is one of the most interesting. Indeed, both cultivars showed a 2–7.5 times decrease in pulp Pb levels, while the concentration of this element in peel either increased (1.6 times in cv. Lotus) or did not change (cv. Autumn rhapsody). Interestingly, among other elements, Pb demonstrated in space-treated tomato fruits the largest increase in peel/pulp ratio: 7.27 times in cv. Autumn rhapsody (from 0.67 to 4.87) and 3.33 (from 9.1 to 30.3) in Lotus (Figure 4). Previous investigations demonstrated the possibility of high Pb accumulation in tomato fruits in conditions of high anthropogenic uptake [63] and the high Pb absorption capacity of peel, emphasizing the prospects of peel utilization in wastewater purification [64]. However, further investigations are needed to check the effectiveness of the latter phenomenon to decrease the risk of tomato fruit Pb accumulation in plants grown in contaminated soils or in conditions of wastewater utilization for irrigation.
Previously, we indicated the significance of bordering tissues and their chemical and mineral composition in plant protection against oxidative stresses. Indeed, the elemental peel/pulp ratio is a good indicator of plant adaptability to stress factors [50]. In this respect, the predominance of Ca and Se accumulation in the peel of the control and space-treated tomato fruits may reflect the importance of these elements for plant development (Figure 6). This statement may also be applied to the predominant accumulation of Pb in the fruit peel of space-treated plants.
The analysis of the relationship between the elements and biochemical parameters demonstrated significant positive correlations between Ca-Sr, Ca-Co, Sr-Co, Sr-Cr, Se-Dry matter and Cr-carotenoids (Table 7). Significant negative correlations were recorded between Mo-dry matter, Se-K and Se-Mo. A positive correlation between Ca and Co was also recorded previously for other plant species grown in Co-contaminated soils [65].
Contrary to the peculiarities in Ca accumulation, with a typical decrease of this element both in the peel and pulp of space-treated fruit, the potassium content in tomato pulp was rather stable compared to the peel, with a significant K level decrease in plants grown from space-treated seeds. According to literature data, Se may either stimulate or inhibit the accumulation of K in plants [66], though in most cases, no correlations between these elements have been revealed [67]. The present results indicate a significant negative correlation between the mentioned parameters. The detected phenomenon does not significantly affect the nutritional value of tomatoes considering the predominant utilization of pulp in nutrition, but it should be taken into account in the breeding process.
We also recorded a negative correlation between the peel/pulp levels of Se and Mo (Table 7). Selenium is known to affect Mo metabolism via participation as a cofactor in certain molybdoenzymes and the stimulation of Mo utilization by plants [68]. Molybdenum (Mo) is regarded as an essential trace element for plants that promotes plant growth and relieves abiotic stresses [69]. In 2012, Zhang et al. [70] revealed an antagonistic relationship between Mo and Se in the Chinese cabbage. The present results indicate that space seed stress causes a Se-Mo imbalance via a significant Mo decrease and a Se increase in fruit tissues. This phenomenon is connected with the antioxidant properties of Se as well as its ability to improve photosynthesis and cell permeability in plants under different forms of biotic and abiotic stresses [58]. These results suggest that Se and Mo are closely related to dry matter content (Table 1) and possibly with dietary fiber accumulation. Indeed, space-treated plants demonstrated not only high levels of Se in tomato fruit but also increased dietary fiber (Table 1).

4. Conclusions

The results of the present research revealed a complex response of mature tomato plants to seed anomalous space stress, including the production of secondary metabolites and dietary fiber as well as the intensive peel/pulp redistribution of carotenoids, macro- and micro-elements. Anomalous changes in Ca, Se, Pb and Fe peel/pulp concentration indicate the active participation of minerals in plant defense. Further investigations with a higher number of tomato cultivars are desirable to clarify the revealed phenomena.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: N.G., E.D. and G.C.; formal analysis: T.Z. and G.N.; investigation: N.G., M.B., M.A. and O.V.; methodology: O.C.M. and A.V.T.; validation, O.C.M., A.V.T. and G.C.; draft manuscript writing, N.G. and G.C.; manuscript revision and final editing, N.G., M.B. and G.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chandler, J.O.; Haas, F.B.; Khan, S.; Bowden, L.; Ignatz, M.; Enfissi, E.M.A.; Gawthrop, F.; Griffiths, A.; Fraser, P.D.; Rensing, S.A.; et al. Rocket Science: The Effect of Spaceflight on Germination Physiology, Ageing, and Transcriptome of Eruca sativa Seeds. Life 2020, 10, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sun, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, L.; Mi, D.; Zhang, B.; Zhou, D.; Zhang, S. Space radiation systems biology research in SJ-10 Satellite. In Research for Development; Duan, E., Long, M., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 43–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, B.-Y.; Wei, X.-L.; Yang, F.-Y.; Zhang, Y.-W. Effects of space flight factors on genetic diversity of Buchloe dactyloides seeds. Afr. J. Biotech. 2011, 10, 12812–12820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zeng, D.; Cui, J.; Yin, Y.; Dai, C.; Zhao, H.; Song, C.; Guan, S.; Cheng, D.; Sun, Y.; Lu, W. Combining Proteomics and Metabolomics to Analyze the Effects of Spaceflight on Rice Progeny. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 900143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ma, Y.; Wang, W.; Sun, Y. Proteomic analysis of high yield rice variety mutated from spaceflight. Adv. Space Res. 2007, 40, 535–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xiao, W.M.; Yang, Q.Y.; Chen, Z.Q.; Wang, H.; Guo, T.; Liu, Y.Z.; Zhu, X.Y. Blast-resistance inheritance of space induced rice lines and their genomic polymorphism by microsatellite markers. Agr. Sci. China 2009, 8, 387–393. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wei, L.J.; Yang, Q.; Xia, H.M. Analysis of cytogenetic damage in rice seeds induced by energetic heavy ions on-ground and after space flight. J. Rad. Res. 2006, 47, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cyranoski, D. Satellite will probe mutating seeds in space. Nature 2001, 410, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Levine, H.G. The Influence of Microgravity on Plants. In Proceedings of the NASA ISS Research Academy and PreApplication Meeting, League City, TX, USA, 3–5 August 2010; Available online: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20110001224/downloads/20110001224.pdf (accessed on 3 May 2021).
  10. Cheng, Z.L.; Zhang, M.; Hang, X.M. Transcriptomic analysis of space-induced rice mutants with enhanced susceptibility to rice blast. Adv. Space Res. 2007, 40, 540–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ren, W.B.; Xu, Z.; Cheng, L.B. Cytological changes of root tip cells of alfalfa seeds after space flight. J. Nucl. Agr. Sci. 2008, 22, 566–568. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Yu, X.; Wu, H.; Wei, L.J.; Cheng, Z.L.; Xin, P.; Huang, C.L.; Zhang, K.P.; Sun, Y.Q. Characteristics of phenotype and genetic mutations in rice after spaceflight. Adv. Space Res. 2007, 40, 528–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, L.; Zhang, Q. Space-induced mutations for crop improvement. In China Nuclear Science and Technology Report; CNIC01139/CSNAS-0111; China Nuclear Information Centre, Atomic Energy Press: Beijing, China, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  14. Musgrave, M.E. Growing plants in space. CAB Rev. Perspect. Agric. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat. Resour. 2007, 2, 065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wolff, S.A.; Coelho, L.H.; Karoliussen, I.; Jost, A.I. Effects of the Extraterrestrial Environment on Plants: Recommendations for Future Space Experiments for the MELiSSA Higher Plant Compartment. Life 2014, 4, 189–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vaulina, E.; Anikeeva, I.; Kostina, L. Radiosensibility of higher plant seeds after space flight. Adv. Space Res. 1984, 4, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kwon, T.; Sparks, J.A.; Nakashima, J.; Allen, S.N.; Tang, Y.H.; Blancaflor, E.B. Transcriptional response of Arabidopsis seedlings during spaceflight reveals peroxidase and cell wall remodeling genes associated with root hair development. Am. J. Bot. 2015, 102, 21–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.H.; Xie, J.Y.; Zheng, H.Q. Differential protein expression profiling of Arabidopsis thaliana callus under microgravity on board the Chinese SZ-8 spacecraft. Planta 2015, 241, 475–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ren, W.B.; Zhang, Y.; Deng, B.; Guo, H.; Cheng, L.; Liu, Y. Effect of space flight factors on alfalfa seeds. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 7273–7279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xianfang, W.; Long, Z.; Weixu, D.; Chungua, L. Study of space mutation breeding in China. Appl. Life Sci. 2004, 18, 241–246. [Google Scholar]
  21. He, X.; Liu, M.; Lu, J.; Xue, H.; Pan, Y. Space mutation breeding: A brief introduction of screening. New floricultural, vegetable and medicinal carieties from earth-grown plants returned from China’s satellites and spaceships. In Floriculture, Ornamental and Plant Biotechnology: Advances and Topical Issues, 1st ed.; Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Ed.; Global Sciebce Books: Isleworth, UK, 2006; pp. 266–271. [Google Scholar]
  22. Prasad, B.; Richter, P.; Vadakedath, N.; Haag, F.W.M.; Strauch, C.M.; Mancinelli, R.; Schwarzwälder, A.; Etcheparre, E.; Gaume, N.; Lebert, M. How the space environment influences organisms: An astrobiological perspective and review. Int. J. Astrobiol. 2021, 20, 159–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kahn, B.A.; Stoffella, P.J. No evidence of adverse effects on germination, emergence, and fruit yield due to space exposure of tomato seeds. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1996, 121, 414–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, C.; Yang, Q.; Long, C.; Li, Y.; Yang, M. Assessment of genetic diversity and variation of Acer Mono Max seedlings after spaceflight. Pakistan J. Bot. 2015, 47, 197–202. [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu, L.X.; Guo, H.J.; Zhao, L.; Gu, J.; Zhao, S. Advances in crop improvement by space mutagenesis in China. ICSC 2008, 4, 274. [Google Scholar]
  26. Dutcher, F.; Hess, E.L.; Halstead, T.W. Progress in plant research in space. Adv. Space Res. 1994, 14, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Caplin, N.M. Developmental, Morphological and Physiological Effects of Chronic Low Doses of Ionizing Radiation on Plants on Earth and in Space. Ph.D. Thesis, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  28. De Micco, V.; Arena, C.; Pignalosa, D.; Durante, M. Effects of Sparsely and Densely Ionizing Radiation on Plants. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 2011, 50, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Arena, C.; De Micco, V.; De Maio, A. Growth alteration and leaf biochemical responses in Phaseolus Vulgaris exposed to different doses of ionizing radiation. Plant Biol. 2014, 16 (Suppl. 1), 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Arena, C.; De Micco, V.; Aronne, G.; Pugliese, M.G.; Virzo, A.; DeMaio, A. Response of Phaseolus vulgaris L. plants to low-LET ionizing radiation: Growth and oxidative stress. Acta Astronaut. 2014, 91, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, Y.; Xu, J.; Li, R.; Ge, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, R. Plants’ Response to Abiotic Stress: Mechanisms and Strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, J.-K. Thriving under stress: How plants balance growth and the stress response. Dev. Cell. 2020, 55, 529–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kharchenko, V.; Golubkina, N.; Skrypnik, L.; Murariu, O.C.; Vecchietti, L.; Caruso, G. The Effect of One-year Seed Spaceflight Storage on Biochemical and Mineral Characteristics of Mature Leafy Vegetables Belonging to Brassicaceae, Apiaceae and Asteraceae Families. Horticuturae 2023, 9, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. AOAC Association Official Analytical Chemists. The Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International; 22 ‘Vitamin C’; AOAC: Rockville, MD, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  35. Golubkina, N.A.; Kekina, H.G.; Molchanova, A.V.; Antoshkina, M.S.; Nadezhkin, S.; Soldatenko, A.V. Plants Antioxidants and Methods of Their Determination; Infra-M: Moscow, Russia, 2020; (In Russian). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ouertani, R.N.; Abid, G.; Karmous, C.; Chikha, M.B.; Boudaya, O.; Mahmoudi, H.; Mejri, S.; Jansen, K.; Ghorbel, A. Evaluating the contribution of osmotic and oxidative stress components on barley growth under salt stress. AoB Plants 2021, 13, plab034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lichtenthaler, H.K. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic bio-membranes. Methods Enzymol. 1987, 148, 350–382. [Google Scholar]
  38. Guide for the Evaluation of Quality and Safety of Food Biologically Active Additives; Organic Acids Determination; Health Ministry of RF: Moscow, Russia, 2004; pp. 109–111.
  39. Guidance on Methods of Quality Control and Safety of Biologically Active Food Supplements, Determination of Soluble and Non Soluble Food Fiber-46-50; Ministry of Health of Russia: Moscow, Russia, 2004; pp. 46–50.
  40. Reitz, N.F.; Mitcham, E.J. Lignification of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) pericarp tissue during blossom-end rot development. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 276, 109759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, G.-L.; Wu, J.-Q.; Chen, Y.-Y.; Xu, Y.-J.; Zhou, C.-L.; Hu, Z.-Z.; Ren, X.-Q.; Xiong, A.-S. More or Less: Recent Advances in Lignin Accumulation and Regulation in Horticultural Crops. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shu, F.; Jiang, B.; Yuan, Y.; Li, M.; Wu, W.; Jin, Y.; Xiao, H. Biological Activities and Emerging Roles of Lignin and Lignin-Based Products—A Review. Biomacromolecules 2021, 22, 4905–4918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Renault, H.; Werck-Reichhart, D.; Weng, J.-K. Harnessing lignin evolution for biotechnological applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2019, 56, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hu, X.; Gu, T.; Khan, I.; Zada, A.; Jia, T. Research Progress in the Interconversion, Turnover and Degradation of Chlorophyll. Cells 2021, 10, 3134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Preedy, V.R.; Watson, R.R. Tomatoes and Tomato Products: Nutritional, Medicinal and Therapeutic Properties; Science Publishers: Enfield, NH, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  46. Panchal, P.; Miller, A.J.; Giri, J. Organic acids: Versatile stress-response roles in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 4038–4052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Couée, I.; Sulmon, C.; Gouesbet, G.; El Amrani, A. Involvement of soluble sugars in reactive oxygen species balance and responses to oxidative stress in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 449–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. El Gamal, R.; Song, C.; Rayan, A.M.; Liu, C.; Al-Rejaie, S.; ElMasry, G. Thermal Degradation of Bioactive Compounds during Drying Process of Horticultural and Agronomic Products: A Comprehensive Overview. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dzhos, E.; Golubkina, N.; Antoshkina, M.; Kondratyeva, I.; Koshevarov, A.; Shkaplerov, A.; Zavarikina, T.; Caruso, G. Effect of Spaceflight on Tomato Seed quality and Biochemical Characteristics of Mature Plants. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Golubkina, N.; Skrypnik, L.; Logvinenko, L.; Zayachkovsky, V.; Smirnova, A.; Krivenkov, L.; Romanov, V.; Kharchenko, V.; Poluboyarinov, P.; Sekara, A.; et al. The ‘Edge Effect’ Phenomenon in Plants: Morphological, Biochemical and Mineral Characteristics of Border Tissues. Diversity 2023, 15, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nechitailo, G.S.; Lu, J.; Xue, H.; Pan, Y.; Tang, C.; Liu, M. Influence of Long Term Exposure to Space Flight on Tomato Seeds. Adv. Space Res. 2005, 36, 1329–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Conn, S.; Gilliham, M. Comparative physiology of elemental distributions in plants. Ann. Bot. 2010, 105, 1081–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Grusak, M.A.; Broadley, M.R.; White, P.J. Plant Macro- and Micronutrient Minerals; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kumari, V.V.; Banerjee, P.; Verma, V.C.; Sukumaran, S.; Chandran, M.A.S.; Gopinath, K.A.; Venkatesh, G.; Yadav, S.K.; Singh, V.K.; Awasthi, N.K. Plant Nutrition: An Effective Way to Alleviate Abiotic Stress in Agricultural Crops. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Elbadrawy, E.; Sello, A. Evaluation of nutritional value and antioxidant activity of tomato peel extracts. Arab. J. Chem. 2016, 9 (Suppl. 2), S1010–S1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kabata-Pendias, A. Trace Elements in Soils and Plants, 4th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  57. Bello, S.K.; Alayafi, A.H.; AL-Solaimani, S.G.; Abo-Elyousr, K.A.M. Mitigating Soil Salinity Stress with Gypsum and Bio-Organic Amendments: A Review. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liu, H.; Xiao, C.; Qiu, T.; Deng, J.; Cheng, H.; Cong, X.; Cheng, S.; Rao, S.; Zhang, Y. Selenium Regulates Antioxidant, Photosynthesis, and Cell Permeability in Plants under Various Abiotic Stresses: A Review. Plants 2023, 12, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sarraf, M.; Janeeshma, E.; Arif, N.; Farooqi, M.Q.U.; Kumar, V.; Ansari, N.A.; Ghani, M.I.; Ahanger, M.A.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Understanding the role of beneficial elements in developing plant stress resilience: Signalling and crosstalk with phytohormones and microbes. Plant Stress 2023, 10, 100224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Golubkina, N. Selenium biorhythms and hormonal regulation Chapter 2 in Selenium. In Sources, Functions and Health Effects; Aomori, C., Hokkaido, M., Eds.; Novapublishers: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 33–74. [Google Scholar]
  61. Riaz, N.; Guerinot, M.L. All together now: Regulation of the iron deficiency response. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 2045–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kaiser, B.N.; Gridley, K.L.; Brady, J.N.; Phillips, T.; Tyerman, S.D. The role of molybdenum in agricultural plant production. Ann. Bot. 2005, 96, 745–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ahmed, D.A.E.A.; Slima, D.F.; Al-Yasi, H.M.; Hassan, L.M.; Galal, T.M. Risk assessment of trace metals in Solanum lycopersicum L. (tomato) grown under wastewater irrigation conditions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 42255–42266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Heraldy, E.; Lestari, W.W.; Permatasari, D.; Arimurti, D.D. Biosorbent from tomato waste and apple juice residue for lead removal. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 1201–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kosiorek, M.; Wyszkowski, M. Macroelement content in plants after amendment application to cobalt-contaminated soil. J. Soils Sediments 2021, 21, 1769–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hawrylak-Nowak, B. Effect of selenium on selected macronutrients in maize plants. J. Elementol. 2008, 13, 513–519. [Google Scholar]
  67. Golubkina, N.; Antoshkina, M.; Bondareva, L.; Sekara, A.; Campagna, E.; Caruso, G. Effect of Foliar Application of Sodium Selenate on Mineral Relationships in Brassicaceae Crops. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, Y.; Jin, J.; Huang, B.; Ying, H.; He, J.; Jiang, L. Selenium metabolism and selenoproteins in prokaryotes: A bioinformatics perspective. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Heshmat, K.; Lajayer, B.A.; Shakiba, M.R.; Astatkie, T. Assessment of physiological traits of common bean cultivars in response to water stress and molybdenum levels. J. Plant Nutr. 2020, 44, 366–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhang, M.; Hu, C.; Zhao, X.; Tan, Q.; Sun, X.; Li, N. Impact of molybdenum on Chinese cabbage response to selenium in solution culture. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2012, 58, 595–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Appearance of control and space-treated tomato plants (a,b) and of pulp homogenates (c,d) of space-treated and control fruits.
Figure 1. Appearance of control and space-treated tomato plants (a,b) and of pulp homogenates (c,d) of space-treated and control fruits.
Horticulturae 10 00289 g001
Figure 2. Changes in tomato fruit dry matter, pigments, dietary fiber, monosaccharides, nitrates and organic acids caused by half a year of spaceflight in seeds.
Figure 2. Changes in tomato fruit dry matter, pigments, dietary fiber, monosaccharides, nitrates and organic acids caused by half a year of spaceflight in seeds.
Horticulturae 10 00289 g002
Figure 3. Ash content in peel and pulp of control and space-treated tomato fruits. Bars indicate standard deviation.
Figure 3. Ash content in peel and pulp of control and space-treated tomato fruits. Bars indicate standard deviation.
Horticulturae 10 00289 g003
Figure 4. Differences in element accumulation between space-treated and control tomato fruits.
Figure 4. Differences in element accumulation between space-treated and control tomato fruits.
Horticulturae 10 00289 g004
Figure 5. Differences in Ca/Sr ratio between control and space-treated plants. The bars indicate the standard deviation.
Figure 5. Differences in Ca/Sr ratio between control and space-treated plants. The bars indicate the standard deviation.
Horticulturae 10 00289 g005
Figure 6. Differences in peel/pulp ratio between control and space-treated tomato fruits.
Figure 6. Differences in peel/pulp ratio between control and space-treated tomato fruits.
Horticulturae 10 00289 g006
Table 1. Biometric, yield and growth parameters of tomato.
Table 1. Biometric, yield and growth parameters of tomato.
ParameterLotusAutumn Rhapsody
ControlSpaceControlSpace
Plant height (cm)99 ± 10 a97 ± 10 a105 ± 12 a100 ± 11 a
Fruit weight (g)84 ± 8 b79 ± 8 b143 ± 14 a138 ± 14 a
Fruit number per plant36 ± 3 a39 ± 4 a14 ± 2 b16 ± 3 b
Early fruit yield (kg m−2)2.53 ± 0.24 a2.76 ± 0.30 a1.81 ± 0.20 b2.02 ± 0.20 b
Total fruit yield (kg m−2)9.18 ± 0.95 a9.04 ± 0.90 a9.25 ± 0.91 a9.13 ± 0.90 a
Fruit diameter (cm)58.4 ± 6 b54.8 ± 5 b73.9 ± 7 a61.7 ± 6 a
Marketability (%)80 ± 5 a79 ± 5 a84 ± 5 a85 ± 5 a
Leaf dry matter (%)10.5 ± 1.0 b12.9 ± 1.1 a11.5 ± 1.0 ab13.5 ± 1.1 a
Fruit pulp dry matter (%)5.3 ± 0.5 c8.0 ± 0.8 a6.0 ± 0.6 bc6.8 ± 0.7 ab
Fruit peel dry matter (%)9.9 ± 0.9 b11.9 ± 1.1 ab9.8 ± 0.9 b13.2 ± 1.2 a
Dietary fiber (% f.w.)5.4 ± 0.3 c6.2 ± 0.4 b6.1 ± 0.5 b8.6 ± 0.7 a
f.w.: fresh weight. Along each line, values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan’s test at p < 0.05.
Table 2. Leaf photosynthetic pigments.
Table 2. Leaf photosynthetic pigments.
Photosynthetic Pigments (mg g−1 d.w.)LotusAutumn Rhapsody
ControlSpaceControlSpace
Chlorophyll a12.08 ± 1.0 ab12.40 ± 1.20 ab10.52 ± 1.00 b13.70 ± 1.21 a
Chlorophyll b6.86 ± 0.61 ab6.05 ± 0.60 b8.96 ± 0.90 a7.41 ± 0.71 a
Total chlorophyll18.94 ± 1.71 a18.45 ± 1.70 a19.48 ± 1.88 a21.11 ± 2.01 a
Carotene2.38 ± 0.20 a2.71 ± 0.22 a2.35 ± 0.20 a2.52 ± 0.21 a
Chl a/Chl b ratio1.802.051.171.84
d.w.: dry weight. Along each line, values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan’s test at p < 0.05.
Table 3. Organic acid accumulation in control and space-treated tomato fruits.
Table 3. Organic acid accumulation in control and space-treated tomato fruits.
ParameterLotusAutumn Rhapsody
ControlSpaceControlSpace
Citric acid (mg 100 g−1 d.w.)7079 ± 395 b8921 ± 480 a7030 ± 480 b8333 ± 430 a
Malic acid (mg 100 g−1 d.w.)1015 ± 57 c1261 ± 61 b1248 ± 63 b1447 ± 67 a
Oxalic acid (mg 100 g−1 d.w.)43.4 ± 2.5 a10.0 ± 0.6 c33.3 ± 1.7 b5.9 ± 0.4 d
Total (mg 100 g−1 d.w.)8137.4 ± 422 b10,192 ± 499 a8311 ± 405 b9785.9 ± 512 a
Citric/malic ratio6.977.075.635.76
Monosaccharides (g 100 g−1 d.w.)50.8 ± 4.8 a56.8 ± 5.2 a36.7 ± 3.2 b45.6 ± 4.2 a
Nitrates (mg kg−1 d.w.)10,774 ± 780 a7662.5 ± 540 b9283 ± 650 a6956 ± 430 b
Along each line, values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan’s test at p < 0.05.
Table 4. Antioxidant parameters of tomato fruits.
Table 4. Antioxidant parameters of tomato fruits.
ParameterPlant PartLotusAutumn Rhapsody
ControlSpaceControlSpace
AOA
(mg GAE g−1 d.w.)
Pulp43.9 ± 3.9 b41.9 ± 4.0 b56.2 ± 5.2 a56.7 ± 5.3 a
Peel48.9 ± 4.2 ab50.2 ± 4.9 a57.9 ± 5.2 a54.6 ± 5.2 a
Peel/pulp1.1141.1981.0300.963
Polyphenols (TP)
(mg GAE g−1 d.w.)
Pulp18.0 ± 1.7 c17.3 ± 1.6 c18.7 ± 1.7 c18.7 ± 1.7 c
Peel19.8 ± 1.8 bc24.2 ± 2.1 a22.6 ± 1.8 ab22.4 ± 1.8 ab
Peel/pulp1.1001.3991.2091.198
Ascorbic acid (mg 100 g−1 d.w.)Pulp232 ± 23 b272 ± 27 ab278 ± 27 ab328 ± 32 a
Proline (mg g−1 d.w.)8.0 ± 0.7 a9.3 ± 0.9 a9.1 ± 0.9 a9.6 ± 0.9 a
Within each parameter, values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan’s test at p < 0.05.
Table 5. Carotenoid profile of control and space-treated tomato fruits.
Table 5. Carotenoid profile of control and space-treated tomato fruits.
ParameterPlant PartLotusAutumn Rhapsody
ControlSpaceControlSpace
Total Carotenoids (mg 100 g−1 d.w.)Pulp117.1 ± 10.1 a68.8 ± 6.2 b81.5 ± 8.0 b56.7 ± 5.1 c
β-carotene (mg 100 g−1 d.w.)TraceTrace62.7 ± 6.0 a35.1 ± 3.1 b
Lutein (mg 100 g−1 d.w.)31.1 ± 2.9 a25.9 ± 2.2 ab18.8 ± 1.7 b21.6 ± 2.0 b
Lycopene (mg 100 g−1 d.w.)86 ± 8 a42.9 ± 4.0 btracestraces
Total Carotenoids (mg 100 g−1 d.w.)Peel245.3 ± 23.5 b299.1 ± 28.2 a92.9 ± 9.1 d136.4 ± 12.9 c
β-carotene (mg 100 g−1 d.w.)TraceTrace54.1 ± 5.0 b103.8 ± 9.3 a
Lutein (mg 100 g−1 d.w.)49.5 ± 4.3 a49.6 ± 4.4 a38.8 ± 3.5 b32.6 ± 2.9 b
Lycopene (mg 100 g−1 d.w.)195.8 ± 19.0 b249.5 ± 24.2 aTraceTrace
Total carotenoidsPeel/
/pulp ratio
2.094.301.142.41
Lutein1.5921.9152.0641.509
Lycopene2.285.82--
β-carotene--0.862.96
Along each line, values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan’s test at p < 0.05.
Table 6. Mineral composition of tomato fruits grown from seeds subjected to one-year spaceflight (mg kg−1 d.w.).
Table 6. Mineral composition of tomato fruits grown from seeds subjected to one-year spaceflight (mg kg−1 d.w.).
Autumn RhapsodyLotus
ControlSpace TreatmentControlSpace Treatment
PulpPeelPulpPeelPulpPeelPulpPeel
Ca1127 ± 113 c3084 ± 302 a851 ± 85 d1658 ± 164 b1313 ± 130 bc3569 ± 360 a766 ± 76 d1432 ± 143 b
K27,254 ± 2700 ab27,805 ± 2700 an27,722 ± 2700 ab19,515 ± 1900 c27,595 ± 2700 ab27,187 ± 2700 ab30,939 ± 3000 a23,839 ± 2300 b
Mg1061 ± 103 bcd1531 ± 150 a1254 ± 124 ab845 ± 84 d1071 ± 105 abc860 ± 86 d1204 ± 120 bc990 ± 98 cd
Na275 ± 27 b363 ± 36 a328 ± 33 a298 ± 30 ab248 ± 24 bc219 ± 22 c268 ± 27 bc268 ± 26 bc
P5594 ± 560 bc9125 ± 910 a6321 ± 630 b5522 ± 550 bc5226 ± 520 bc4735 ± 470 c5309 ± 530 bc5780 ± 570 b
B8.41 ± 0.80 bc11.4 ± 1.0 ac7.19 ± 0.70 c8.14 ± 0.80 bc10.7 ± 1.0 a9.71 ± 0.95 ab10.4 ± 1.0 a9.92 ± 1.00 ab
Co0.023 ± 0.002 cd0.043 ± 0.04 a0.026 ± 0.002 bcd0.031 ± 0.003 b0.021 ± 0.002 d0.033 ± 0.003 b0.022 ± 0.002 cd0.028 ± 0.002 b
Cu5.9 ± 0.6 b4.78 ± 0.4 c8.06 ± 0.80 a3.54 ± 0.33 d7.48 ± 0.75 a2.94 ± 0.30 d5.08 ± 0.50 bc3.35 ± 0.33 d
Fe30.7 ± 3.0 e55.4 ± 5.2 a49.3 ± 4.9 ab37.2 ± 3.6 cde32.2 ± 3.2 de54.7 ± 5.4 a38.0 ± 3.7 cd41.0 ± 4.0 bc
Li0.033 ± 0.003 d0.051 ± 0.004 ab0.019 ± 0.002 e0.054 ± 0.005 a0.033 ± 0.003 d0.047 ± 0.004 abc0.043 ± 0.004 bc0.042 ± 0.004 c
Mn5.22 ± 0.50 c9.28 ± 0.91 a8.76 ± 0.85 a6.03 ± 0.60 b5.25 ± 0.51 c6.22 ± 0.61 b c6.01 ± 0.60 bc6.92 ± 0.70 b
Mo1.62 ± 0.13 a1.59 ± 0.15 a1.07 ± 0.10 b0.72 ± 0.07 cd1.56 ± 0.15 a0.95 ± 0.09 b0.89 ± 0.08 bc0.62 ± 0.06 d
Se0.04 ± 0.01 e0.23 ± 0.02 c0.20 ± 0.02 c0.65 ± 0.06 a0.03 ± 0.01 e0.21 ± 0.02 c0.12 ± 0.01 d0.37 ± 0.03 b
Zn13.8 ± 1.3 b19.2 ± 1.9 a17.7 ± 1.8 a17.7 ± 1.7 a13.8 ± 1.3 b13.9 ± 1.3 b16.0 ± 1.6 ab17.3 ± 1.7 a
Al143 ± 14 b81.5 ± 8.0 d178 ± 17.1 a133 ± 13 b212 ± 21 a51.2 ± 5.0 e105 ± 10 c57.7 ± 5.6 e
As0.046 ± 0.005 bc0.066 ± 0.006 a0.048 ± 0.05 bc0.043 ± 0.04 c0.051 ± 0.005 b0.025 ± 0.002 b0.057 ± 0.006 ab0.037 ± 0.003 c
Cd0.057 ± 0.005 d0.095 ± 0.01 ab0.063 ± 0.006 d0.11 ± 0.01 a0.078 ± 0.007 c0.092 ± 0.009 ab0.11 ± 0.01 a0.086 ± 0.008 bc
Cr0.10 ± 0.01 d0.15 ± 0.01 b0.12 ± 0.01 cd0.15 ± 0.01 b0.15 ± 0.01 b0.19 ± 0.02 a0.12 ± 0.01 cd0.14 ± 0.01 bc
Ni0.13 ± 0.01 ef0.23 ± 0.02 a0.14 ± 0.01 de0.18 ± 0.01 b0.17 ± 0.01 bc0.12 ± 0.01 f0.14 ± 0.01 de0.15 ± 0.01 cd
Pb1.12 ± 0.11 b0.75 ± 0.07 c0.15 ± 0.01 f0.73 ± 0.07 c0.20 ± 0.02 e1.82 ± 0.2 a0.10 ± 0.01 h0.30 ± 0.03 d
Sr20.8 ± 0.2 b46.6 ± 4.4 a10.2 ± 1.0 c20.2 ± 2.0 b19.2 ± 1.9 b48.4 ± 4.8 a9.43 ± 0.92 c20.9 ± 2.0 b
V0.073 ± 0.007 d0.11 ± 0.01 ac0.086 ± 0.008 cd0.07 ± 0.01 b0.13 ± 0.01 a0.071 ± 0.007 d0.099 ± 0.01 bc0.080 ± 0.008 d
Along each line, values with the same letters do not differ significantly according to Duncan’s test at p < 0.05.
Table 7. Correlations between the parameters measured in control and space tomato fruits.
Table 7. Correlations between the parameters measured in control and space tomato fruits.
CaFeMoSeSrCoCrCarotenoidsDry Matter
K−0.0800.1490.454−0.875 a−0.022−0.124−0.2390.417−0.696 d
Ca0.717 d0.0960.1330.983 a0.803 b0.4200.6470.376
Fe−0.1040.0760.6640.756 c0.1890.3370.403
Mo−0.680 d0.2310.180−0.544−0.437−0.693 d
Se0.0500.3150.3590.2710.843 a
Sr0.794 c0.381 d0.5840.299
Co−0.0230.1460.366
Cr0.5910.482
Carotenoids0.550
p< (a) 0.001; (b) 0.005; (c) 0.01; (d) 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Golubkina, N.; Dzhos, E.; Bogachuk, M.; Antoshkina, M.; Verba, O.; Zavarykina, T.; Nechitailo, G.; Murariu, O.C.; Tallarita, A.V.; Caruso, G. Effect of Seed Spaceflight Storage on Tomato Fruit Quality and Peel/Pulp Mineral and Antioxidant Distribution. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10030289

AMA Style

Golubkina N, Dzhos E, Bogachuk M, Antoshkina M, Verba O, Zavarykina T, Nechitailo G, Murariu OC, Tallarita AV, Caruso G. Effect of Seed Spaceflight Storage on Tomato Fruit Quality and Peel/Pulp Mineral and Antioxidant Distribution. Horticulturae. 2024; 10(3):289. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10030289

Chicago/Turabian Style

Golubkina, Nadezhda, Elena Dzhos, Maria Bogachuk, Marina Antoshkina, Olga Verba, Tatiana Zavarykina, Galina Nechitailo, Otilia Cristina Murariu, Alessio Vincenzo Tallarita, and Gianluca Caruso. 2024. "Effect of Seed Spaceflight Storage on Tomato Fruit Quality and Peel/Pulp Mineral and Antioxidant Distribution" Horticulturae 10, no. 3: 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10030289

APA Style

Golubkina, N., Dzhos, E., Bogachuk, M., Antoshkina, M., Verba, O., Zavarykina, T., Nechitailo, G., Murariu, O. C., Tallarita, A. V., & Caruso, G. (2024). Effect of Seed Spaceflight Storage on Tomato Fruit Quality and Peel/Pulp Mineral and Antioxidant Distribution. Horticulturae, 10(3), 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10030289

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop