Next Article in Journal
Endophyte Bacillus vallismortis BL01 to Control Fungal and Bacterial Phytopathogens of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Different Weeding Methods on Soil Physicochemical Properties, Root Morphology, and Fruit Economic Traits in Camellia oleifera Abel. Plantations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Genome-Wide Identification, Characterization, and Expression Patterns of the Auxin-Responsive PbGH3 Gene Family Reveal Its Crucial Role in Organ Development

1
Engineering Research Center of Coal-Based Ecological Carbon Sequestration Technology of the Ministry of Education, Shanxi Datong University, Datong 037009, China
2
College of Horticulture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, China
3
College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.
Horticulturae 2024, 10(10), 1094; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10101094
Submission received: 9 September 2024 / Revised: 2 October 2024 / Accepted: 8 October 2024 / Published: 14 October 2024

Abstract

:
The regulation of vital plant activities by hormones is governed by a family of macromolecular peptides referred to as GH3 genes. This work analyzed the expression patterns of GH3 family genes in pear tissues using transcriptome data and bioinformatics analysis. In the Bai Li pear genome, a total of 18 PbGH3 genes were identified. Comparative evolutionary studies have shown a strong association between PbGH3 and AtGH3 class I and class II proteins. The role of PbGH3 genes in growth activities and hormone regulation was revealed using gene ontology (GO) and promoter region analysis. In addition, although certain PbGH3 genes exhibited tissue-specific expression in sepals, the majority had a ubiquitous expression across all tissues. Bioinformatics and expression studies suggest that the GH3 gene family in pears may have a role in controlling the abscission of the fruit’s sepals. This work sheds light on the pear fruit sepal shedding process and may inspire further research.

1. Introduction

The pear (Pyrus L.), a member of the Rosaceae family, is the most extensively cultivated fruit tree globally, making it highly favored among consumers [1]. A premium pear cultivar, ‘Yuluxiangli’ has been all the rage recently thanks to its delicate skin, juicy meat, sweet flavor, long shelf life, and resilience to stress [2]. Nevertheless, the fruit’s quality, commodity value, and market competitiveness might be negatively impacted by persistent sepals [1]. Sepals constitute the outermost layer of the floral organ, comprising mesophyll cells, vascular bundles, and both the upper and lower epidermis. In summary, they avert mechanical damage from precipitation and moisture depletion while also protecting internal structures from additional elements [3]. As an example, ‘Yuluxiangli’ can have problems including delayed ripening, uneven surface, irregular form, and rustiness due to the sepals’ persistence. Multiple hormones interact in a complicated way to regulate organ abscission in plants, which is in turn regulated by both internal plant genetic variables and external environmental influences [4]. The process of organ shedding is regulated by nearly every plant hormone, including auxin (IAA) [5]. GH3 genes are key in the inactivation of IAA, which is vital for preventing shedding [5]. Our group utilized the ‘Korla fragrant pear’ and ‘Xuehuali’ hybrid F1 population to build a DNA-BSA library in the first stage of our research. Different pear cultivars exhibited variable expressions of these genes during sepal shedding, according to previous research [6].
Growth hormones are crucial for plant development as they influence cell division and biomass enhancement and are integral to phototropism and gravitropism [7,8,9]. The auxin early-response genes can be categorized into three primary groups: Aux/IAAs (auxin/indoleacetic acid), SAURs (small auxin up-RNAs), and GH3s (Gretchen Hagen 3), which facilitate the swift and elevated expression of specific genes [10,11]. GH3 genes are also transcriptionally regulated by stress-related hormones ABA (abscisic acid), JA (jasmonic acid), and SA (salicylic acid); growth-promoting hormones GA (gibberellins) and BRs (brassinosteroids); and ripening/senescence-associated hormone ETH (ethylene) [12]. The auxin-activated GH3 genes regulate several biological processes. Prior research has demonstrated that the GH3 gene is involved in various biological processes such as plant defense response, light signal transduction pathway, plant hormone signaling, cell wall disintegration, and fruit ripening and softening [13]. Additionally, GH3 genes participate in enhancing plant resistance against abiotic and biotic stresses [14]. It has been found that the GH3 gene promoter contains AuxRE, an auxin response element that can bind specifically to ARF and mediate auxin response genes. In particular, the GH3 protein is involved in the binding of IAA and amino acids and forms a negative feedback loop to regulate auxin isoenzymes [14]. Most group II members of GH3 are IAA amide synthetases, which can bind IAA to amino acids and change free IAA into the bound form, indicating that the GH3 gene participates in the signaling pathway of IAA [15]. The expression-based analysis of ‘Korla fragrant pear’ revealed that the GH3 gene was upregulated in the exfoliated sepals, indicating that GH3 may participate in the process of sepal exfoliation [6].
In this study, in silico and expression analysis of the auxin amide synthetase gene GH3 were carried out with ‘Yuluxiangli’ as the research material. In particular, we conducted an extensive bioinformatic analysis to understand the structural and functional characteristics of the GH3 gene family in pears. The expression analysis of PbGH3 genes displayed varied expression in different organs of the pear. The study’s overarching goal is to provide genetic resources for researchers interested in the heritability and shedding mechanisms of pear tissues, particularly sepals. Additionally, it will provide a reference for the study of the GH3 gene family in other Rosaceae species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

The test materials for this experiment were ‘Yuluxiangli’ pears that were cultivated in the pear germplasm resource garden of the Fruit Tree Research Institute of Shanxi Agricultural University (112°30′26.454″ E and 37°21′4.980″ N). To support the growth of pear trees, a double-arm parallel scaffolding mode was used in the current study.

2.2. Treatments

Three ‘Yuluxiangli’ branches with a nine-year-old tree were chosen for biological replication under the same field management. At the initial stage of full bloom in spring, gibberellin acid 3 (GA3, calyx retention agent), Paclobutrazol (a gibberellin inhibitor, PP333), and distilled water (CK) were sprayed, respectively, until the entire flower was fully wet and the solution dripped. Subsequently, two weeks after spraying, at the end of the full bloom period, the calyx abscission zone tissues of pear fruits, the peel, pulp, and calyx tube tissue of the persistent fruit, as well as the single tissue of the petals, sepals, leaves, and leaf buds before the shedding of the young fruit were collected for IAA and RNA extraction. The experiment was designed using a random block design, and the single plant plot was repeated three times.

2.3. Statistics of Calyx Shedding Rate of Pear Fruits

Three weeks after the application of the treatment (during the first physiological fruit drop), the calyx shedding rate was investigated and calculated for a total of 100 fruits, with three repetitions per individual plant plot. The calyx shedding rate was defined as the ratio of the number of fruits with calyx shedding to the total number of fruits set.

2.4. Measurement of Endogenous IAA Content in the Calyx Abscission Zone

The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method was employed to determine the endogenous IAA content [16,17]. Specifically, the endogenous auxin (IAA) content was measured in the calyx collected at the late full bloom stage.

2.5. Identification of GH3 Genes in Pear Genome

The GH3 family members were identified in the Chinese white pear genome and European pear genome (http://peargenome.njau.edu.cn/, accessed on 7 September 2022) using blastp and hmmsearch methods [18,19]. Firstly, a Hidden Markov Model search (HMM search) was conducted to examine the presence of the GH3 domain in the protein sequences [20]. This was achieved by using Pfam (http://pfam.xfam.org/, accessed on 7 September 2022), smart (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/, accessed on 7 September 2022), and the InterProScan tool (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/pfa/iprscan/, accessed on 7 September 2022).

2.6. Chemical Properties and Chromosomal Location of Pear GH3 Protein Family

The amino acid sequence length, molecular weight, aliphatic amino acid index, isoelectric point, and hydrophilicity of the pear GH3 protein family were analyzed using the online tool ProtParam (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/, accessed on 7th September 2022). The chromosome locations of pear GH3 genes were analyzed using BLAST software v2.2.25 (https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/executables/blast+/, accessed on 7th September 2022). This involved aligning the GH3 sequences against the pear genome sequence and obtaining the chromosome positions of all GH3 genes [21].

2.7. Phylogenetic Analysis of Pear GH3 Protein

Protein sequences of the pear PbGH3, western pear, and Arabidopsis GH3 families were aligned using the ClustalW program in MEGA 7.0, and then manual correction was performed [22,23]. Next, we used the maximum likelihood technique to build an evolutionary model, keeping all other parameters at their default values and setting the BootStrap parameter to 1000.

2.8. Conserved Domain and Motif Analysis of Pear GH3 Protein

The conserved motif of the pear GH3 protein family was analyzed using the online software MEME (http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme, accessed on 9 September 2022) and visualized with TBtools-II (Toolbox for Biologists) v1.108.

2.9. Collinearity Analysis

The OrthoMCL algorithm was used to identify paralogous genes within the pear genome, and then the MCScan algorithm was applied to detect syntenic blocks containing pear GH3 genes [24]. The syntenic relationships between the pear genomes were visualized using Circos and TBtools-II (Toolbox for Biologists) v1.108 software.

2.10. Analysis of Cis-Acting Elements of Pear GH3 Gene Family Promoter

The 2 kb region, upstream of the start codon, was downloaded from the pear genome database (http://peargenome.njau.edu.cn/, accessed on 9 September 2022). The cis-elements were identified using the PlantCARE (https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 9 September 2022) online database and visualized using TBtools-II (Toolbox for Biologists) v1.108 software.

2.11. Gene Ontology and Interactive Protein Network Analysis

The putative functions of the PbGH3 genes were predicted using BLAST2GO (2.2.31+). The predicted functions at biological, molecular, and cellular levels were investigated and presented. The STRING database (https://string-db.org/, accessed on 4 April 2024) was used to estimate the interaction network of GH3 proteins. The STRING database was searched for pear data using the PbGH3.1 proteins as the query. The network encompassed both physical and functional protein relationships, with a minimum interaction score of 0.400 being established for medium confidence.

2.12. RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from the mixture of pear samples using the CTAB method [25,26]. cDNA was synthesized using TaKaRa’s PrimeScript RT reagent Kit. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using the EasyScript® One-Step cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Primer pairs for qRT-PCR were designed using Primer Premier 6.0 (Premier Biosoft, San Francisco, CA, USA). qRT-PCR was performed on a Bio-Rad CFX96 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA, USA). The Actin gene (KT943411.1) was used as the standard internal control. The relative expression levels were calculated using the comparative 2−ΔΔCt method.

2.13. The Source of Expression Analysis of PbGH3s

Transcriptomic RNA-seq data were collected from different developmental stages of pear tissues in Pyrus bretschneideri (BioProject: PRJNA309745) and fruit stages in five cultivars of Pyrus (PRJNA309745).

2.14. Statistical Analysis

The results of the experiment were expressed as the mean standard error. The data were subjected to a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS 24.0 for analysis. Duncan’s multiple range test was used to evaluate statistically significant differences between WT and transgenic lines under different treatments, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Different Chemical Treatments on the Calyx Removal Rate and Calyx IAA Content in‘Yuluxiangli’

Previous research has shown that gibberellin inhibits the calyx removal of ‘Yuluxiangli’, but Paclobutrazol promotes it. The purpose of studying ‘Yuluxiangli’ calyx detachment and IAA content was to examine the association between these two chemical treatments and IAA content [27,28]. While the calyx decaying rate rose after spraying paclobutrazol, the IAA content of ‘Yuluxiangli’ reduced dramatically compared to the control (Figure 1A). On the other hand, following GA spraying, there was an increase in IAA content and a drop in the calyx removal rate (Figure 1B). The results showed that the Calyx removal rate was proportional to the concentration of IAA in the calyx, with a lower declining rate observed for samples with larger concentrations of IAA (Figure 1A).

3.2. Identification and Sequence Analysis of the Pear GH3 Gene Family

The HMM model of the GH3 protein family was used to identify a total of eighteen candidate members in the white pear reference genome. Subsequently, a total of eighteen GH3 family genes in white pear were screened using Pfam database analysis (Table 1). Isoelectric point (PI) values ranged between 5.23 and 9.13, with the lowest value being PbGH3.11 and the highest value being PbGH3.12. The molecular weight (MW) of GH3 protein ranged from 15.26 to 69.58 (KD). PbGH3.12 had the lowest MW among the GH3 members, while PbGH3.9 had the highest MW. Further analysis indicated that PbGH3.9 had the highest number of amino acids (615), whereas PbGH3.12 had the lowest. For chromosome mapping, GH3 family genes were distributed on several chromosomes of Bai Li, with chromosome 5 having the highest number of PbGH3 genes (PbGH3.3, PbGH3.4, PbGH3.5, and PbGH3.6). The PbGH3.12, PbGH3.17, PbGH3.18, PbGH3.13, PbGH3.15, and PbGH3.16 were not integrated into the assembled chromosomes.

3.3. Chromosomal Mapping

Chromosomal mapping research was carried out to visualize the physical location of the PbGH3 gene family (Figure 2). Out of all the chromosomes, chromosome 5 has the most genes, with four different ones: PbGH3.3, PbGH3.4, PbGH3.5, and PbGH3.6. Specifically, scaffold663.0 has three genes: PbGH3.13, PbGH3.15, and PbGH3.16. Along with that, Scaffold435.0.1 possesses two genes, specifically PbGH3.17 and PbGH3.18. In order to keep mitotic chromosomes structurally intact, scaffold chromosomes play a crucial role. Scaffold chromosomes are composed of nonhistone proteins present in low abundance, which further define the fate of chromosome shape.

3.4. Phylogenetic Analysis of Pear GH3 Family Proteins

The results of the evolutionary relationship between the GH3 protein of white pear and Arabidopsis thaliana showed that they could be divided into two groups (Group I and Group II) (Figure 3). with 3 and 15 members, respectively. Proteins from the A. thaliana Group III family did not cluster with any PbGH3-related proteins. The proteins PbGH3.1, PbGH3.7, and PbGH3.12 showed high homology with Arabidopsis GH3 class I protein, while the other protein members displayed high homology with Arabidopsis GH3 class II protein. The white pear PbGH3.3 and PbGH3.4 proteins showed the strongest similarity to the AtGH3.1 protein from A. thaliana, while the AtGH3.10 protein showed the strongest distance. PbGH3.3 and PbGH3.4 were the closest relatives to PcGH3.5 and PcGH3.6 from Western pear, respectively, and the most distant relatives to PcGH3.9.

3.5. Synteny Analysis of the PbGH3 Gene Family

Gene duplication leads to the expansion of gene families through segmental and tandem duplications. We speculated about the exact mechanism that had driven the expansion of the GH3 gene family in pears. We analyzed gene duplication events in the PbGH3 gene family. As shown in Figure S1, a total of 18 PbGH3 genes were unevenly mapped onto chromosomes 1, 2, 5, 9, 13, 15, 16, and 4 scaffold chromosomes. Scaffold chromosomes, along with chromosome 5, contain the highest number of duplicated genes. Interestingly, Chr5 contains five PbGH3 genes, in which PbGH3.6 duplicated with PbGH3.9 on Chr15. In addition, PbGH3.2 on Chr2 duplicated with PbGH3.10 on Chr15 and PbGH3.17 on Scaffold435.0.1. Furthermore, PbGH3.15 and PbGH3.18 duplicated on the unknown regions of Scafflold633.0 and Scaffold435.0.1, respectively. The gff3 file of the pear genome contains 17 chromosomes as well as numerous scaffolds that could not be placed. All the other chromosomes exhibit at least one duplicated gene.

3.6. Analysis of Conserved Motifs of Pear GH3 Protein Family

The conserved motifs of the pear GH3 protein family were analyzed, and the results are shown in (Figure 4 and Figure S2). Ten conserved motifs were named motif1-motif10, respectively, and out of ten, only nine motifs were presented in the amino acid sequence. Among the 18 protein members, PbGH3.13 lacks motif8, while PbGH3.15 lacks motif10 and motif8. Additionally, PbGH3.1 lacks motif8, while PbGH3.16 only has motif10 and motif5. Interestingly, PbGH3.12 only possessed motif4, the only motif observed in all PbGH3 proteins. Sequence analysis of the conserved motifs, as shown in Figure 4, showed that GH3 protein is highly conserved in pears.

3.7. Cis-Acting Element of the Promoter of Pear GH3 Family Gene

The cis-acting elements in the promoter region of the pear GH3 gene family were analyzed and are presented in Figure 5. The results highlighted numerous stresses, hormone regulation, and light-responsive cis-elements in the promoter region of the GH3 gene family. For example, a large number of elements responsive to light reaction, including G-Box, ACE, TGACG-motif, TCCC-motif, GATA-motif, G-box, WUN-motif, AT1-motif, CAAT-box, ABRE, and I-box were found in the promoter region of the GH3 gene family. All 18 GH3 family genes exhibited hormone-related cis-elements, such as the salicylic acid-responsive element SARE and TCA-element, as well as MeJA response elements CGTCA-motif and TGACG-motif. Among them,12 genes, including PbGH3.12, PbGH3.10, PbGH3.8, PbGH3.1, PbGH3.2, PbGH3.17, PbGH3.6, PbGH3.4, PbGH3.16, PbGH3.11, and PbGH3.14 have abscisic acid response elements (ABREs). Seven genes, namely PbGH3.8, PbGH3.1, PbGH3.9, PbGH3.13, PbGH3.5, PbGH3.16, and PbGH3.11 have gibberellin response elements such as TATC-box, GARE-motif, and P-box. PbGH3.3, PbGH3.10, PbGH3.8, PbGH3.9, PbGH3.2, PbGH3.17, and PbGH3.18 carry AuxRR-core and TGA-element, which are the major auxin responsive cis-elements. Some drought and low-temperature-responsive elements were also identified in the promoter region of the PbGH3 genes. It is suggested that the GH3 genes may be involved in the process of light signal transduction and plant hormone signal transduction, such as auxin signal transduction.

3.8. Gene Ontology and Protein–Protein Interaction Analysis

The gene ontology (GO) analysis was performed to investigate the predictive functions of PbGH3 genes. The GO analysis revealed that the PbGH3 gene family is involved in an array of biological, molecular, and cellular processes (Figure 6A). In the biological process category, the PbGH3 genes are mainly involved in the regulation of auxin homeostasis, hormonal response, response to light and chemicals, and other environmental stimuli. As stated in the molecular processes category, the PbGH3 genes are also responsible for the synthesis of IAA, modulation of ligase activity, and catalytic activity (Figure 6A). The STRING database was used for protein interaction to identify the potential interactive partners. The PbGH3.1 was used as a reference, and the analysis yielded several interactive partners. For instance, the XP_009372106 (Flowering time control protein FCA isoform X1), XP_009335003 (Probably inactive leucine-rich repeat receptor-like protein), XP_009354357 (LRR receptor-like serine/threonine-protein kinase GSO1), XP_009351080 (Two-component response regulator arr5-like), XP_009334310 (4-coumarate--CoA ligase-like 5), and XP_009356576 (Phytochrome-interacting factor 4; Transcription factor PIF4-like). These interactive proteins are involved in a variety of biological processes. The gene arr5, a cytokinin response regulator, is crucial in fine-tuning key developmental processes and is highly interactive with PbGH3.1 (Figure 6B).

3.9. Gene Expression in Calyx Tube and Calyx Retaining Pear Fruits

We examined the expression of eight GH3 genes to learn about the function of the PbGH3 gene family. After abscission, the calyx tube showed an increased expression of the GH3 gene family compared to the retained. The GH3 gene is a significant component of the early auxin signal response and could be involved in the induction of fruit calyx abscission via the auxin signaling pathway.

3.10. Expression Characteristics of GH3 Genes in Different Parts of Pear

The expression pattern of the PbGH3 gene family was analyzed in different tissues of ‘Yuluxiangli’ (Figure 7). All PbGH3 genes showed moderate expression in leaf tissue, with PbGH3.9 showing the highest expression and PbGH3.1 the lowest. Similarly, moderate to high mRNA levels were observed in pulp tissue for all the genes. The PbGH3.8, and PbGH3.10 genes showed more prominent expression patterns in pericarp (T) tissue than other genes. Almost every PbGH3 gene, with the exception of PbGH3.16, displayed increased expression in the pericarp (S). All PbGH3 genes showed high expressions in the calyx and calyx tubes. It is worth noting that flower tissue did not exhibit strong expression of all PbGH3 genes. The white pear bud tissue showed noticeably greater expression of all PbGH3 genes.

3.11. Expression Characteristics of GH3 Genes in Different Organs and Cultivars of Pear

In order to understand the role of the PbGH3 genes in growth processes, expression analysis was carried out in several pear organs and cultivars. For instance, the PbGH3.1 gene displayed prominent expression in the ovary, petals, S4F (flower), S4L (leaf), sepal, bud, and stem (Figure 8A). Similarly, high expression was also observed in the different cultivars of pears, such as Pbr, Pco, Ppy, Psi, and Pus (Figure 8B). The PbGH3.2, except for the ovary, did not exhibit expression in other organs, whereas it had mild expression in various cultivars of pear. The PbGH3.3 demonstrated higher expression in different pear cultivars, with the highest level recorded in Pbr. However, PbGH3.3 was only abundant in S4L and stem. The other members of PbGH3 exhibited inconsistent expression trends in the organs and cultivars. In this regard, PbGH3.4 showed moderate expression in the organs but not in cultivars. All the other genes showed no or moderate expression in the organs and cultivars. It can be inferred that PbGH3 genes, particularly PbGH3.1, PbGH3.2, and PbGH3.3, could play a crucial role in modulating the development of organs in various pear cultivars, owing to their uniform expression pattern.

3.12. Graphical Representation of PbGH3.1 in Pear Tissues

After finding that PbGH3.1 is highly expressed in all five species of pear, we visually represented this expression in pear tissues (Figure 8). Throughout the pear life cycle, the PbGH3.1 gene exhibited considerable expression levels, including the sepal, as demonstrated in the model (Figure 9).

4. Discussion

Auxin is one of the earliest discovered plant hormones. It regulates physiological responses, including phototropism, geotropism, vascular tissue formation, root development, and flower and fruit development [29,30]. It participates in stress responses, including drought stress, salt stress, and pathogen attack. Alteration of auxin levels in plants can induce the rapid expression of some genes. These genes, known as auxin early response genes (AERGs), include the Aux/IAA family, GH3 family, and SAUR family [29]. Herein, we studied the role of PbGH3 genes in pear organ shedding and abscission.

4.1. IAA Is Crucial in Controlling Pear Organ Shedding

Fruit abscission is a naturally occurring process that enables fruit trees to abandon no longer needed, infected, or damaged organs, which can be negative to plant survival [31]. Previous research showed that IAA is crucial in regulating organ shedding [31]. For instance, the direct application of IAA or its synergistic partner GA can significantly reduce the shedding [10]. Research has shown that organ abscission is hindered by high levels of IAA, but it can be enhanced by spraying an external chemical called PP333, which lowers the levels of IAA [32]. The amount of IAA in the pear calyx was shown to be significantly correlated with the rate of calyx removal in this study. More precisely, a decrease in the concentration of IAA leads to an increase in the rate at which calyxes are removed. Here, we observed that the application of GA3 induced the IAA contents, which eventually reduced calyx removal (Figure 1).

4.2. PbGH3 Are Widely Distributed in Pear Genome

The process of organ abscission is facilitated by auxin [32]. In the genome of ‘Dangshansuli’, 18 members of the GH3 gene family were identified. Predictions of subcellular localization placed the majority of the genes in the cytoplasm, plasma membrane, or mitochondrial matrix (Table 1). Nine substantially conserved motifs were found via homologous sequence comparison. All members of the GH3 gene family possess the motif4 (DNSIGPLEIRVVKNGTFEELMDYAISRGASINQYKTPRCVN), which suggests that these genes have been conserved throughout evolution at the amino acid level (Figure 4). Numerous plant species, notably rice, have been the subject of substantial research into the GH3 gene family in the past few years [33], grapes [34], and others. The GH3 gene family can be further subdivided into two or three groups based on their evolutionary relationships with one another (Figure 3). A. thaliana has 19 GH3 proteins, including an incomplete protein. Based on the sequence similarity of GH3 protein and their substrate specificity, the GH3 gene family can be divided into three different subfamilies. In this study, the sequence of the PbGH3 protein family was compared to the AtGH3 protein family, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed. The analysis showed that the evolutionary relationship of three pear PbGH3 protein members with Arabidopsis class I was similar, suggesting that these three members may have similar functions with class I proteins and may play a role in catalyzing the connection of JA and ethylene (ETH) synthesis precursor 1-amino cyclopropyl carboxylic acid (ACC). Furthermore, 15 genes exhibited a similar evolutionary relationship to Arabidopsis class II proteins, suggesting their potential involvement in catalyzing the adenylation of IAA or binding with amino acids and participating in the regulation of IAA balance in plants [35]. No members with a similar evolutionary relationship to Arabidopsis class III proteins were identified. Previous research has demonstrated that the conserved motif TGTCTC of AuxREs, a cis-acting auxin-responsive element, is necessary for auxin-responsive element regulation [1]. In this study, no AuxREs were identified at the upstream promoter region of pear PbGH3. However, functional elements containing phytohormones and stress responses, including TGA-element and AuxRR-core, with sequences of AACGAC and GGTCCAT, respectively, were identified at the upstream region of pear PbGH3 (Figure 5).

4.3. PbGH3 Regulate Sepal Shedding in Pear

Auxin is the master regulator of almost all the developmental events in plants and depends largely on auxin homeostasis [10,32,36]. GH3 genes are key components in plant growth and developmental activities via auxin homeostasis [37]. Regarding production biology, GH3 genes have previously been reported to be instrumental in regulating the organogenesis of reproductive organs. For instance, the gene AcGH3.1 is prominently expressed during the postharvest ripening of kiwi fruit [38]. Similarly, tomato SlGH3.1 and SlGH.3 sharply increase during ripening and could be vital in regulating auxin-mediated postharvest ripening in tomato fruit [32]. The DlGH3.2 displayed pericarp-specific expression in longan fruit [39]. The majority of the Capsicum chinense CcGH3 were differentially expressed in sepals, petals, and mature pericarp [40]. According to the research of [41], the number of stamens in the GH3.9 gene overexpressing plants is less than that of pistils, and the stamens are shorter, which is not conducive to the self-pollination of Arabidopsis and will further affect the formation of fruit.
The importance of GH3s has been observed in many A. thaliana GH3 mutants. For example, the ydk1-D (yadokari) mutant and dfl1-D (dwarf in light) mutant, isolated by the screening of activation-tagged lines, demonstrate upregulated gene expressions of GH3.2/YDK1 and GH3.6/DFL1, respectively [13]. The effect of GH3 gene expression on plant growth and development has also been studied in other plant species. For example, a gain-of-function mutation of rice OsGH3.1, OsGH3.2, OsGH3.8, or OsGH3.13/TLD1 (tld1-D mutant), which encode IAA-amino synthetases, results in dwarfed plant phenotypes often with reduced fertility [13,42]. Similarly, different tissues of the pear showed unique expression patterns for the 18 members of the GH3 gene family, according to the current study. PbGH3.10, PbGH3.15, PbGH3.16, PbGH3.2, PbGH3.17, PbGH3.18, and PbGH3.11 had the most significant levels of expression in sepals, indicating their role in the growth and development of sepals (Figure 6). On the other hand, PbGH3.3, PbGH3.14, and PbGH3.9 showed the highest expression, indicating their potential role in leaf buds (Figure 6). Additionally, PbGH3.13 exhibited the highest expression in the flesh of persistent calyx, suggesting its significance in the development of the fruit flesh of ‘Yuluxiangli’. Our data provided the latest information on the role of PbGH3 genes in calyx removal and could be used as potential biomolecules in future pear breeding programs.

5. Conclusions

The fruit’s shape and quality largely depend on the pear’s persistent calyx. We found that IAA homeostasis is instrumental during the calyx abscission process, and the GH3 gene family fine-tunes this process. We identified 18 GH3 family members of auxin amide synthetase genes in white pear, which showed typical structural characteristics of the GH3 family. Most of the GH3 members in pear were significantly upregulated in sepals, and under Paclobutrazol treatment, the gene expression of some GH3 members increased. Based on these findings, we speculate that members of the pear GH3 gene family may regulate the free IAA content and thus contribute to the development of pear tissues, particularly in sepals. However, it remains unclear whether the GH3 gene acts through the IAA pathway and how it affects the development of pear tissues, especially sepals.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/horticulturae10101094/s1, Figure S1. Chromosomal distribution and collinearity of pear PbGH3 genes. Figure S2. The amino acid sequence of the conserved motif of the GH3 protein family of pear.

Author Contributions

B.D. and C.H. planned and designed the research. B.D. and C.H. collected the plant materials, performed the experiment, and analyzed the data. B.D., Q.C., X.C., M.T.A. and M.N. wrote the manuscript. B.D. and C.H. contributed to sample data collection. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32102364), Shanxi Provincial Higher Education Youth Academic Leader Project (2024Q031), and the Shanxi Post-doctoral Research Project (k4621029072021).

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests.

References

  1. Xu, R.; Ali, A.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Sharif, R.; Feng, X.; Ding, B. Transcriptome-wide analysis revealed the influential role of PbrMTP (Metal Tolerance Protein) in the growth and fruit development of Chinese white pear. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Tang, C.; Lv, S.; Zhang, S.; Wu, J.; Wang, P. PbRbohH/J mediates ROS generation to regulate the growth of pollen tube in pear. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 207, 108342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, L.; Li, H.T.; Gao, L.M.; Yang, J.B.; Li, D.Z.; Cannon, C.H.; Chen, J.; Li, Q.J. Phylogeny and evolution of bracts and bracteoles in Tacca (Dioscoreaceae). J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2011, 53, 901–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Taylor, J.E.; Whitelaw, C.A. Signals in abscission. New Phytol. 2001, 151, 323–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, X.; Wei, L.; Wei, S.; Wei, D.; Qin, L.; Li, C.; Huang, S.; Tian, D.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, W.; et al. Endogenous hormones in Musa. ABB Group Niujiaojiao and Guijia 6 and machanism of main enzymes regulating style abscission. J. South. Agric. 2018, 49, 1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ding, B.; Li, X.; Lin, Y.; Hu, C.; Yang, R.; Wei, B.; Cao, Y.; Bai, Y.; Yan, R.; Li, L. Study on cloning and bioinformatics of auxin nicotinamide synthase gene GH3 in ‘Yuluxiangli’. J. Shanxi Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2024, 44, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yao, J.; Kang, C.; Gu, C.; Gleave, A.P. The roles of floral organ genes in regulating Rosaceae fruit development. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 12, 644424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ahmad, S.; Chen, Y.; Shah, A.Z.; Wang, H.; Xi, C.; Zhu, H.; Ge, L. The homeodomain-leucine zipper genes family regulates the jinggangmycin mediated immune response of Oryza sativa to Nilaparvata lugens, and Laodelphax striatellus. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yan, R.; Zhang, T.; Wang, Y.; Wang, W.; Sharif, R.; Liu, J.; Dong, Q.; Luan, H.; Zhang, X.; Li, H.; et al. The apple MdGA2ox7 modulates the balance between growth and stress tolerance in an anthocyanin-dependent manner. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 212, 108707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sharif, R.; Su, L.; Chen, X.; Qi, X. Hormonal interactions underlying parthenocarpic fruit formation in horticultural crops. Hortic. Res. 2022, 9, uhab024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pan, J.; Song, J.; Sohail, H.; Sharif, R.; Yan, W.; Hu, Q.; Qi, X.; Yang, X.; Xu, X.; Chen, X. RNA-seq-based comparative transcriptome analysis reveals the role of CsPrx73 in waterlogging triggered adventitious root formation in cucumber. Hortic. Res. 2024, 11, uhae062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yu, D.; Qanmber, G.; Lu, L.; Wang, L.; Li, J.; Yang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y.; Chen, Q.; Mendu, V.; et al. Genome-wide analysis of cotton GH3 subfamily II reveals functional divergence in fiber development, hormone response and plant architecture. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wojtaczka, P.; Ciarkowska, A.; Starzynska, E.; Ostrowski, M. The GH3 amidosynthetases family and their role in metabolic crosstalk modulation of plant signaling compounds. Phytochemistry 2022, 194, 113039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ulmasov, T.; Murfett, J.; Hagen, G.; Guilfoyle, T.J. Aux/IAA proteins repress expression of reporter genes containing natural and highly active synthetic auxin response elements. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 1963–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ding, B.; Hu, H.; Cao, Y.; Xu, R.; Lin, Y.; Muhammad, T.U.Q.; Song, Y.; He, G.; Han, Y.; Guo, H.; et al. Pear genomes display significant genetic diversity and provide novel insights into the fruit quality traits diferentiation. Hortic Plant J. 2024, 10, 1274–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pan, J.; Sohail, H.; Sharif, R.; Hu, Q.; Song, J.; Qi, X.; Chen, X.; Xu, X. Cucumber JASMONATE ZIM-DOMAIN 8 interaction with transcription factor MYB6 impairs waterlogging-triggered adventitious rooting. Plant Physiol. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jia, P.; Sharif, R.; Li, Y.; Sun, T.; Li, S.; Zhang, X.; Dong, Q.; Luan, H.; Guo, S.; Ren, X.; et al. The BELL1-like homeobox gene MdBLH14 from apple controls flowering and plant height via repression of MdGA20ox3. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 242, 124790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sharif, R.; Xie, C.; Wang, J.; Cao, Z.; Zhang, H.; Chen, P.; Yuhong, L. Genome wide identification, characterization and expression analysis of HD-ZIP gene family in Cucumis sativus L. under biotic and various abiotic stresses. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 158, 502–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shalmani, A.; Ullah, U.; Muhammad, I.; Zhang, D.; Sharif, R.; Jia, P.; Saleem, N.; Gul, N.; Rakhmanova, A.; Tahir, M.M.; et al. The TAZ domain-containing proteins play important role in the heavy metals stress biology in plants. Environ. Res. 2021, 197, 111030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fei, L.; Liu, J.; Liao, Y.; Sharif, R.; Liu, F.; Lei, J.; Chen, G.; Zhu, Z.; Chen, C. The CaABCG14 transporter gene regulates the capsaicin accumulation in Pepper septum. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 280, 136122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ahmad, S.; Jeridi, M.; Siddiqui, S.; Ali, S.; Shah, A.Z. Genome-wide identification, characterization, and expression analysis of the Chalcone Synthase gene family in Oryza sativa under Abiotic Stresses. Plant Stress 2023, 202, 100201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jiang, L.; Li, X.; Lv, K.; Wang, H.; Li, Z.; Qi, W.; Zhang, L.; Cao, Y. Rosaceae phylogenomic studies provide insights into the evolution of new genes. Hortic Plant J. 2024, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ahmad, S.; Ali, S.; Shah, A.Z.; Khan, A.; Faria, S. Chalcone synthase (CHS) family genes regulate the growth and response of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) to Botrytis cinerea and abiotic stresses. Plant Stress 2023, 8, 100159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ullah, U.; Shalmani, A.; Ilyas, M.; Raza, A.; Ahmad, S.; Shah, A.Z.; Khan, F.U.; AzizUd, D.; Bibi, A.; Rehman, S.U.; et al. BZR proteins: Identification, evolutionary and expression analysis under various exogenous growth regulators in plants. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2022, 49, 12039–12053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jia, P.; Wang, Y.; Sharif, R.; Ren, X.; Qi, G. MdIPT1, an adenylate isopentenyltransferase coding gene from Malus domestica, is involved in branching and flowering regulation. Plant Sci. 2023, 333, 111730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yi, Z.; Sharif, R.; Gulzar, S.; Huang, Y.; Ning, T.; Zhan, H.; Meng, Y.; Xu, C. Changes in hemicellulose metabolism in banana peel during fruit development and ripening. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 215, 109025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Su, L.; Rahat, S.; Ren, N.; Kojima, M.; Takebayashi, Y.; Sakakibara, H.; Wang, M.; Chen, X.; Qi, X. Cytokinin and auxin modulate cucumber parthenocarpy fruit development. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 282, 110026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Su, L.; Wang, M.; Wang, Y.; Sharif, R.; Ren, N.; Qian, C.; Xu, J.; Chen, X.; Qi, X. Forchlorfenuron application induced parthenocarpic fruit formation without affecting fruit quality of cucumber. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bao, D.; Chang, S.; Li, X.; Qi, Y. Advances in the study of auxin early response genes: Aux/IAA, GH3, and SAUR. Crop J. 2024, 12, 964–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pan, J.; Tu, J.; Sharif, R.; Qi, X.; Xu, X.; Chen, X. Study of JASMONATE ZIM-Domain gene family to waterlogging stress in Cucumis sativus L. Veg. Res. 2021, 1, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xie, R.; Ge, T.; Zhang, J.; Pan, X.; Ma, Y.; Yi, S.; Zheng, Y. The molecular events of IAA inhibiting citrus fruitlet abscission revealed by digital gene expression profiling. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 130, 192–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sharif, R.; Su, L.; Chen, X.; Qi, X. Involvement of auxin in growth and stress response of cucumber. Veg. Res. 2022, 2, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jain, M.; Kaur, N.; Tyagi, A.K.; Khurana, J.P. The auxin-responsive GH3 gene family in rice (Oryza sativa). Funct. Integr. Genom. 2006, 6, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Böttcher, C.; Keyzers, R.A.; Boss, P.K.; Davies, C. Sequestration of auxin by the indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetase GH3-1 in grape berry (Vitis vinifera L.) and the proposed role of auxin conjugation during ripening. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 3615–3625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhang, Z.; Li, Q.; Li, Z.; Staswick, P.E.; Wang, M.; Zhu, Y.; He, Z. Dual regulation role of GH3.5 in salicylic acid and auxin signaling during Arabidopsis-Pseudomonas syringae interaction. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145, 450–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sharif, R.; Zhu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Sohail, H.; Li, S.; Chen, X.; Qi, X. microRNA regulates cytokinin induced parthenocarpy in Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 212, 108681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kong, W.; Zhang, Y.; Deng, X.; Li, S.; Zhang, C.; Li, Y. Comparative genomic and transcriptomic analysis suggests the evolutionary dynamic of GH3 genes in Gramineae crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gan, Z.; Fei, L.; Shan, N.; Fu, Y.; Chen, J. Identification and expression analysis of Gretchen Hagen 3 (GH3) in Kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) during postharvest process. Plants 2019, 8, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kuang, J.F.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.Y.; Chen, Q.J.; Jiang, Y.M.; Lin, H.T.; Xu, S.J.; Lu, W.J. Two GH3 genes from longan are differentially regulated during fruit growth and development. Gene 2011, 485, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, K.; Kang, B.-C.; Jiang, H.; Moore, S.L.; Li, H.; Watkins, C.B.; Setter, T.L.; Jahn, M.M. A GH3-like gene, CcGH3, isolated from Capsicum chinense L. fruit is regulated by auxin and ethylene*. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 58, 447–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Khan, S.; Stone, J.M. Arabidopsis thaliana GH3.9 influences primary root growth. Planta 2007, 226, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Du, H.; Wu, N.; Fu, J.; Wang, S.; Li, X.; Xiao, J.; Xiong, L. A GH3 family member, OsGH3-2, modulates auxin and abscisic acid levels and differentially affects drought and cold tolerance in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 6467–6480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (A) The effect of different chemical treatments on the content of IAA in the calyx at the end of full bloom. (B) The effect of different chemical treatments on the rate of calyx removal. GA3: Gibberellin acid 3, calyx retention agent; PP333: Paclobutrazol, a defoliant; CK: Treated with distilled water as control. The small alphabet represents significant levels at p < 0.05.
Figure 1. (A) The effect of different chemical treatments on the content of IAA in the calyx at the end of full bloom. (B) The effect of different chemical treatments on the rate of calyx removal. GA3: Gibberellin acid 3, calyx retention agent; PP333: Paclobutrazol, a defoliant; CK: Treated with distilled water as control. The small alphabet represents significant levels at p < 0.05.
Horticulturae 10 01094 g001
Figure 2. Chromosomal mapping of PbGH3 genes over 7 different chromosomes with an additional four scaffolds chromosomes.
Figure 2. Chromosomal mapping of PbGH3 genes over 7 different chromosomes with an additional four scaffolds chromosomes.
Horticulturae 10 01094 g002
Figure 3. The evolutionary history was inferred using the neighbor-joining matrix-based method from GH3 protein using Mega 6.0. Protein sequences from Arabidopsis thaliana; Pb: Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd; Pc: Pyrus communis were used to construct the tree. The final tree is displayed using ITol.
Figure 3. The evolutionary history was inferred using the neighbor-joining matrix-based method from GH3 protein using Mega 6.0. Protein sequences from Arabidopsis thaliana; Pb: Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd; Pc: Pyrus communis were used to construct the tree. The final tree is displayed using ITol.
Horticulturae 10 01094 g003
Figure 4. Conserved motifs of the protein sequence of the pear GH3 family. The rectangles in different colors represent conservative motif 1-conservative motif 10.
Figure 4. Conserved motifs of the protein sequence of the pear GH3 family. The rectangles in different colors represent conservative motif 1-conservative motif 10.
Horticulturae 10 01094 g004
Figure 5. Cis-acting element of the promoter of the pear GH3 family gene. The 2 kb sequence upstream from the start codon of PbGH3 genes was analyzed using the PlantCARE database. Different colored graphics represent different cis-acting elements.
Figure 5. Cis-acting element of the promoter of the pear GH3 family gene. The 2 kb sequence upstream from the start codon of PbGH3 genes was analyzed using the PlantCARE database. Different colored graphics represent different cis-acting elements.
Horticulturae 10 01094 g005
Figure 6. PbGH3 Gene Ontology and their Protein–Protein Interaction Analysis. (A): GO analysis of PbGH3 genes, distributed in three categories. (B): Predicted protein-protein interaction network of JrAHL protein. The network nodes represent proteins.
Figure 6. PbGH3 Gene Ontology and their Protein–Protein Interaction Analysis. (A): GO analysis of PbGH3 genes, distributed in three categories. (B): Predicted protein-protein interaction network of JrAHL protein. The network nodes represent proteins.
Horticulturae 10 01094 g006
Figure 7. Expression characteristics of GH3 gene family in different parts of ‘Yuluxiangli’. Each value represents the mean ± standard error of three replicates. The log2 transformation method normalized and converted the RPKM values. Different letters indicate significant differences; different small letters on the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) with one-way ANOVA. Note: leaf: leaf; pulp (T): detached calyx fruit pulp; pericarp (T): detached calyx fruit skin; pericarp (S): persistent calyx fruit skin: pulp (S): persistent calyx fruit pulp; flower: petals; calyx: sepals; calyx tube (T): away from the calyx tube; calyx tube (S): away from the calyx tube; bud: leaf bud.
Figure 7. Expression characteristics of GH3 gene family in different parts of ‘Yuluxiangli’. Each value represents the mean ± standard error of three replicates. The log2 transformation method normalized and converted the RPKM values. Different letters indicate significant differences; different small letters on the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) with one-way ANOVA. Note: leaf: leaf; pulp (T): detached calyx fruit pulp; pericarp (T): detached calyx fruit skin; pericarp (S): persistent calyx fruit skin: pulp (S): persistent calyx fruit pulp; flower: petals; calyx: sepals; calyx tube (T): away from the calyx tube; calyx tube (S): away from the calyx tube; bud: leaf bud.
Horticulturae 10 01094 g007
Figure 8. Expression characteristics of GH3 gene family in different organs and cultivars of pear. (A): GH3 gene family in different organs based on transcript expression profiles from Pyrus bretschneideri. Data were obtained from the ovary, petal, S4F (Fruit_Stage 4 collected in August), S4L (Leave_Stage 4 collected in August), sepal, bud, and stem. Levels of expression are displayed as red for higher and blue for lower. (B): RNA sequencing of different developmental stages of pear fruit in five cultivars, including ‘Yali’ (P. bretschneideri, Pbr), ‘Starkrimson’ (P. communis, Pco), ‘Hosui’ (P. pyrifolia, Ppy), ‘Kuerlexiangli’, (P. sinkiangensis, Psi), ‘Nanguoli’ (P. ussuriensis, Pus). The heatmap was created by the Tbtools program; each column’s boxes with color showed expression of the PbGH3 gene family relative to log2 (fold change).
Figure 8. Expression characteristics of GH3 gene family in different organs and cultivars of pear. (A): GH3 gene family in different organs based on transcript expression profiles from Pyrus bretschneideri. Data were obtained from the ovary, petal, S4F (Fruit_Stage 4 collected in August), S4L (Leave_Stage 4 collected in August), sepal, bud, and stem. Levels of expression are displayed as red for higher and blue for lower. (B): RNA sequencing of different developmental stages of pear fruit in five cultivars, including ‘Yali’ (P. bretschneideri, Pbr), ‘Starkrimson’ (P. communis, Pco), ‘Hosui’ (P. pyrifolia, Ppy), ‘Kuerlexiangli’, (P. sinkiangensis, Psi), ‘Nanguoli’ (P. ussuriensis, Pus). The heatmap was created by the Tbtools program; each column’s boxes with color showed expression of the PbGH3 gene family relative to log2 (fold change).
Horticulturae 10 01094 g008
Figure 9. A schematic showing the distribution of PbGH3.1 expression in various Chinese white pear tissues. Various organs’ names have been displayed. The white gray indicates modest expression, while the dark red indicates high expression.
Figure 9. A schematic showing the distribution of PbGH3.1 expression in various Chinese white pear tissues. Various organs’ names have been displayed. The white gray indicates modest expression, while the dark red indicates high expression.
Horticulturae 10 01094 g009
Table 1. Genomic information and protein characteristics analysis of pear GH3 family gene members.
Table 1. Genomic information and protein characteristics analysis of pear GH3 family gene members.
Gene NamedGene IDChromosome
Location
Genomic LocationCDS Length (bp)Protein
Length (bp)PIMW (kD)Subcellular Localization
PbGH3.1Pb021060Chr13,422,119–3,427,54617165725.5763.62cytoplasm
PbGH3.2Pb025212Chr212,797,476–12,800,53318006005.9767.51cytoplasm
PbGH3.3Pb007550Chr59,944,262–9,946,29718066025.4567.48cytoplasm
PbGH3.4Pb030571Chr510,665,377–10,667,40018066025.8067.51cytoplasm
PbGH3.5Pb030587Chr510,922,247-10,924,27018066025.8067.51cytoplasm
PbGH3.6Pb027334Chr513,774,253–13,776,42418456156.6269.28plasma membrane
PbGH3.7Pb030688Chr920,040,241–20,043,78917705906.0466.87cytoplasm
PbGH3.8Pb018629Chr138,170,306–8,172,68118246085.2869.21cytoplasm
PbGH3.9Pb021158Chr159,092,247–9,094,62518456157.1469.58plasma membrane
PbGH3.10Pb015325Chr1524,177,962–24,180,05418006005.3267.34cytoplasm
PbGH3.11Pb037834Chr165,069,847–5,072,23818366125.2369.46cytoplasm
PbGH3.12Pb006240scaffold1310.040,731–41,1324021349.13152.62cytoplasm
PbGH3.13Pb034084scaffold633.0110,010–112,45017795936.1367.00cytoplasm
PbGH3.14Pb041132scaffold921.0133,377–135,54818456157.0969.31plasma membrane
PbGH3.15Pb034085scaffold633.0149,274–150,90113684565.5751.52mitochondrial matrix space
PbGH3.16Pb034086scaffold633.0151,196–151,7164351458.8116.30mitochondrial matrix space
PbGH3.17Pb026872scaffold435.0.1214,889–216,98118006005.3267.34cytoplasm
PbGH3.18Pb026873scaffold435.0.1270,065–272,15718006005.3267.34cytoplasm
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ding, B.; Hu, C.; Cheng, Q.; Tanveer Akhtar, M.; Noor, M.; Cui, X. The Genome-Wide Identification, Characterization, and Expression Patterns of the Auxin-Responsive PbGH3 Gene Family Reveal Its Crucial Role in Organ Development. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10101094

AMA Style

Ding B, Hu C, Cheng Q, Tanveer Akhtar M, Noor M, Cui X. The Genome-Wide Identification, Characterization, and Expression Patterns of the Auxin-Responsive PbGH3 Gene Family Reveal Its Crucial Role in Organ Development. Horticulturae. 2024; 10(10):1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10101094

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ding, Baopeng, Chaohui Hu, Qing Cheng, Muhammad Tanveer Akhtar, Maryam Noor, and Xingyu Cui. 2024. "The Genome-Wide Identification, Characterization, and Expression Patterns of the Auxin-Responsive PbGH3 Gene Family Reveal Its Crucial Role in Organ Development" Horticulturae 10, no. 10: 1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10101094

APA Style

Ding, B., Hu, C., Cheng, Q., Tanveer Akhtar, M., Noor, M., & Cui, X. (2024). The Genome-Wide Identification, Characterization, and Expression Patterns of the Auxin-Responsive PbGH3 Gene Family Reveal Its Crucial Role in Organ Development. Horticulturae, 10(10), 1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10101094

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop